Search Results (9)

Background/Objectives: Rapid, objective phenotyping of donor kidneys is needed to support peri-implant decisions. Label-free Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of static cold-storage Celsior^® perfusion fluid can discriminate kidneys recovered from donation after circulatory death (DCD) versus donation after brain death (DBD). Methods: Preservation solution from isolated kidney allografts (n = 10; 5 DCD/5 DBD) matched on demographics was analyzed in the Amide I and fingerprint regions. Several spectral preprocessing steps were applied, and feature extraction was based on the Fast Correlation-Based Filter. Support vector machines and Naïve Bayes were evaluated. Unsupervised structure was assessed based on cosine distance, multidimensional scaling, and hierarchical clustering. Two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy (2D-COS) was used to examine band co-variation. Results: Donor cohorts were well balanced, except for higher terminal serum creatinine in DCD. Quality metrics were comparable, indicating no systematic technical bias. In Amide I, derivatives improved classification, but performance remained modest (e.g., second derivative with feature selection yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 and an accuracy of 0.90 for support vector machines; Naïve Bayes reached an AUC of 0.92 with an accuracy of 0.70). The fingerprint window was most informative. Naïve Bayes with second derivative plus feature selection identified bands at ~1202, ~1203, ~1342, and ~1413 cm⁻¹ and achieved an AUC of 1.00 and an accuracy of 1.00. Unsupervised analyses showed coherent grouping in the fingerprint region, and 2D correlation maps indicated coordinated multi-band changes. Conclusions: Performance in this 10-sample pilot should be interpreted cautiously, as perfect leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) estimates are vulnerable to overfitting. The findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating, and they require confirmation in larger, multicenter cohorts with a pre-registered analysis pipeline and external validation. Full article

Background/Objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) remains the standard treatment for end-stage liver disease. While donation after brain death (DBD) is the predominant source of grafts, non-standard donors are increasingly used. Optimizing procurement techniques may improve graft function and reduce early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Methods: This retrospective monocenter study analyzed 231 first LT performed between 2013 and 2024. Patients were divided into two eras: Era 1 (n = 143, 2013–2019, standard aortic perfusion) and Era 2 (n = 88, 2019–2024, refined procurement strategies including combined aortic-portal perfusion, adjusted perfusion volumes, and additional caval venting). Exclusion criteria were retransplantation, DCD, split grafts, combined transplants, and early thrombosis. The primary endpoint was EAD. Secondary endpoints included graft loss and mortality. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance groups. Results: After IPTW, EAD incidence was significantly reduced in Era 2 (42.3% vs. 24.6%, p < 0.0001). Similarly, graft loss (12.6% vs. 32.2%, p < 0.0001) and mortality (11.6% vs. 30.8%, p < 0.0001) decreased. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed improved graft survival in Era 2 (HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.28–0.99, p = 0.046). Sub-analysis of expanded criteria donors confirmed significant reductions in EAD, graft loss, and mortality. Conclusions: Refined procurement strategies in DBD grafts significantly reduced EAD, graft loss, and mortality. These simple, cost-effective refinements represent a valuable approach to optimize outcomes, particularly with marginal donors, and warrant validation in multicenter prospective studies. Full article

Background: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) accounts for 10–15% of liver transplants but is the leading cause of retransplant. This study evaluates whether PSC patients have different survival and graft outcomes when receiving grafts from donors after brain death (DBD) versus circulatory (DCD) death. Methods: Using the SRTR database (2004–2024), we compared PSC patients receiving DCD vs. DBD grafts. Demographics and outcomes including graft loss, mortality, and retransplant were analyzed using multivariable logistic and Cox regression, along with propensity-matched analysis. Results: Among 5762 PSC patients, 391 (6.8%) received DCD grafts. Patients receiving DCD grafts were older but had lower MELD scores (19 vs. 22; p < 0.001) and were less often functionally dependent (11.3% vs. 24.4%; p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated that receipt of a DCD graft was independently associated with time to graft loss (HR 1.59; CI 1.10–2.31; p = 0.013. Similarly, DCD graft receipt significantly increased the likelihood of requiring retransplant (HR 3.25; CI: 1.93–5.46; p < 0.001) but did not increase the likelihood of mortality. Propensity matched analysis further supported these finding with significantly higher graft loss with DCD grafts at one and two years and higher retransplant rates at all time points including 5-years (+7.9%, CI 4.4 to 11.4%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: DCD grafts in PSC patients are linked to worse graft survival and higher retransplant rates. They may be best suited for older, lower-MELD patients, but further studies on perfusion strategies are needed. Full article

(1) Background: Cardiac donation after circulatory death (DCD) is an emerging paradigm in organ transplantation. However, this technique is recent and has only been implemented by highly experienced centers. This study compares the characteristics and outcomes of thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TANRP) and static cold-storage DCD and traditional donation after brain death (DBD) cardiac transplants (CT) in a newly stablished transplant program with restricted donor availability. (2) Method: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of all adult patients who underwent a CT between November 2019 and December 2023, with a follow-up conducted until August 2024. Data were retrieved from medical records. A review of the current literature on DCD CT was conducted to provide a broader context for our findings. The primary outcome was survival at 6 months after transplantation. (3) Results: During the study period, 76 adults (median age 56 years [IQR: 50–63 years]) underwent CT, and 12 (16%) were DCD donors. DCD donors had a similar age (46 vs. 47 years, p = 0.727), were mostly male (92%), and one patient had left ventricular dysfunction during the intraoperative DCD process. There were no significant differences in recipients’ characteristics. Survival was similar in the DCD group compared to DBD at 6 months (100 vs. 94%) and 12 months post-CT survival (92% vs. 94%), p = 0.82. There was no primary graft dysfunction in the DCD group (9% in DBD, p = 0.581). The median total hospital stay was longer in the DCD group (46 vs. 21 days, p = 0.021). An increase of 150% in transplantation activity due to DCD was estimated. (4) Conclusions: In a new CT program that utilized older donors and included recipients with similar illnesses and comorbidities, comparable outcomes between DCD and DBD hearts were observed. DCD was rapidly incorporated into the transplant activity, demonstrating an expedited learning curve and significantly increasing the availability of donor hearts. Full article

Background: Non-ideal donors provide acceptable allografts and may expand the donor pool. This study evaluates donor utilization across solid organs over 15-years in the United States. Methods: We analyzed the OPTN STAR database to identify potential donors across three donor eras: 2005–2009, 2010–2014, and 2015–2019. Donors were analyzed by a composite Donor Utilization Score (DUS), comprised of donor age and comorbidities. Outcomes of interest were overall and organ-specific donor utilization. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression modeling were performed. p-values < 0.01 considered significant. Results: Of 132,465 donors, 32,710 (24.7%) were identified as non-ideal donors (NID), based on a DUS ≥ 3. Compared to ideal donors (ID), NID were older (median 56 years, IQR 51–64 years vs. 35 years, 22–48 years, p < 0.001) and more frequently female (44.3% vs. 39.1%, p < 0.001), Black (22.1% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001) and obese (60.7% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001). The likelihood of overall DBD utilization from NID increased from Era 1 to Era 2 (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.123–1.341, p < 0.001) and Era 3 (OR 1.504, 1.376–1.643, p < 0.001), while DCD donor utilization in NID was not statistically different across Eras. Compared to Era 1, the likelihood of DBD utilization from NID for kidney transplantation was lower in Era 2 (OR 0.882, 0.822–0.946) and Era 3 (OR 0.938, 0.876–1.004, p = 0.002). The likelihood of NID utilization increased in Era 3 compared to Era 1 for livers (OR 1.511, 1.411–1.618, p < 0.001), hearts (OR 1.623, 1.415–1.862, p < 0.001), and lungs (OR 2.251, 2.011–2.520, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Using a universal definition of NID across organs, NID donor utilization is increasing; however, use of DUS may improve resource utilization in identifying donors at highest likelihood for multi-organ donation. Full article

Background and Objectives: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is considered a surrogate marker for adverse post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes. With the increasing use of nonconventional donors, EAD has become a more frequent occurrence. Given this background, we aimed to assess the prevalence and impact of EAD in an updated cohort inclusive of both conventional and nonconventional liver allografts. Materials and Methods: Perioperative and one-year outcomes were assessed for a total of 611 LT recipients with and without EAD from Mayo Clinic Arizona. EAD was defined as the presence of one or more of the following: bilirubin > 10 mg/dL on day 7, INR > 1.6 on day 7, or ALT and/or AST > 2000 IU/L within the first 7 days of LT. Results: Within this cohort, 31.8% of grafts (n = 194) came from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, 17.7% (n = 108) were nationally shared, 16.4% (n = 100) were allocated as post-cross clamp, and 8.7% contained moderate steatosis. EAD was observed in 52.2% (n = 321) of grafts in the study cohort (79% in DCD grafts and 40% in DBD grafts). EAD grafts had higher donor risk index (DRI) scores (1.9 vs. 1.6, p < 0.0001), were more likely to come from DCD donors (48% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.0001), were regionally allocated (p = 0.003), and had higher cold ischemia times (median 6.0 vs. 5.5 h, p = 0.001). Primary nonfunction events were rare in both groups (1.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.22). Post-LT acute kidney injury occurred at a similar frequency in recipients with and without EAD (43.6% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.41), and there were no differences in ICU (median 2 vs. 1 day, p = 0.60) or hospital (6 vs. 5 days, p = 0.24) length of stay. For DCD grafts, the rate of ischemic cholangiopathy was similar in the two groups (14.9% EAD vs. 17.5% no EAD, p = 0.69). One-year patient survival for grafts with and without EAD was 96.0% and 94.1% (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7–1.8; p = 0.54); one-year graft survival was 92.5% and 92.1% (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7–1.5; p = 0.88). Conclusions: In this cohort, EAD occurred in 52% of grafts. The occurrence of EAD, however, did not portend inferior outcomes. Compared to those without EAD, recipients with EAD had similar post-operative outcomes, as well as one-year patient and graft survival. EAD should be managed supportively and should not be viewed as a deterrent to utilization of non-ideal grafts. Full article

Early hypertransaminasemia after kidney transplantation (KT) is frequent. It has been associated with the crosstalk produced between the liver and the kidney in ischemia-reperfusion situations. However, the influence of the donor type has not been evaluated. We present a retrospective study analyzing the increase in serum aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) during the first three months post-KT in 151 recipients who received thymoglobulin as induction therapy, either from brain-death donors (DBD, n = 75), controlled circulatory death donors (cDCD, n = 33), or uncontrolled DCD (uDCD, n = 43). Eighty-five KT recipients from DBD who received basiliximab were included as controls. From KT recipients who received thymoglobulin, 33.6/43.4% presented with an increase in AST/ALT at 72 h post-KT, respectively. Regarding donor type, the percentage of recipients who experienced 72 h post-KT hypertransaminasemia was higher in uDCD group (65.1/83.7% vs. 20.3/26% in DBD and 20.7/27.6% in cDCD, p < 0.001). Within the control group, 9.4/12.9% of patients presented with AST/ALT elevation. One month after transplant, AST/ALT values returned to baseline in all groups. The multivariate analysis showed that uDCD recipients had 6- to 12-fold higher risk of developing early post-KT hypertransaminasemia. Early post-KT hypertransaminasemia is a frequent and transient event related to the kidney donor type, being more frequent in uDCD recipients. Full article

Hypothermic-oxygenated-machine-perfusion (HOPE) allows assessment/reconditioning of livers procured from high-risk donors before transplantation. Graft referral to HOPE mostly depends on surgeons’ subjective judgment, as objective criteria are still insufficient. We investigated whether analysis of effluent fluids collected upon organ flush during static-cold-storage can improve selection criteria for HOPE utilization. Effluents were analyzed to determine cytolysis enzymes, metabolites, inflammation-related mediators, and damage-associated-molecular-patterns. Molecular profiles were assessed by unsupervised cluster analysis. Differences between “machine perfusion (MP)-yes” vs. “MP-no”; “brain-death (DBD) vs. donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD)”; “early-allograft-dysfunction (EAD)-yes” vs. “EAD-no” groups, as well as correlation between effluent variables and transplantation outcome, were investigated. Livers assigned to HOPE (n = 18) showed a different molecular profile relative to grafts transplanted without this procedure (n = 21, p = 0.021). Increases in the inflammatory mediators PTX3 (p = 0.048), CXCL8/IL-8 (p = 0.017), TNF-α (p = 0.038), and ANGPTL4 (p = 0.010) were observed, whereas the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was reduced (p = 0.007). Peculiar inflammation, cell death, and coagulation signatures were observed in fluids collected from DCD livers compared to those from DBD grafts. AST (p = 0.034), ALT (p = 0.047), and LDH (p = 0.047) were higher in the “EAD-yes” compared to the “EAD-no” group. Cytolysis markers and hyaluronan correlated with recipient creatinine, AST, and ICU stay. The study demonstrates that effluent molecular analysis can provide directions about the use of HOPE. Full article

Background and objectives: Kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) are more likely to be declined for transplantation compared with kidneys from donation after brain death (DBD). The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics in the biopsies of human DCD and DBD kidneys that were declined for transplantation in order to rescue more DCD kidneys. Materials and Methods: Sixty kidney donors (DCD = 36, DBD = 24) were recruited into the study and assessed using donor demographics. Kidney biopsies taken post cold storage were also evaluated for histological damage, inflammation (myeloperoxidase, MPO), von Willebrand factor (vWF) expression, complement 4d (C4d) deposition and complement 3 (C3) activation using H&E and immunohistochemistry staining, and Western blotting. Results: More DBD donors (16/24) had a history of hypertension compared with DCDs (8/36, p = 0.001). The mean warm ischemic time in the DCD kidneys was 12.9 ± 3.9 min. The mean cold ischemic time was not significantly different between the two groups of kidney donors (DBD 33.3 ± 16.7 vs. DCD 28.6 ± 14.1 h, p > 0.05). The score of histological damage and MPO, as well as the reactivity of vWF, C4d and C3, varied between kidneys, but there was no significant difference between the two donor types (p > 0.05). However, vWF reactivity might be an early indicator for loss of tissue integrity, while C4d deposition and activated C3 might be better predictors for histological damage. Conclusions: Similar characteristics of DCD were shown in comparison with DBD kidneys. Importantly, the additional warm ischemic time in DCD appeared to have no further detectable adverse effects on tissue injury, inflammation and complement activation. vWF, C4d and C3 might be potential biomarkers facilitating the evaluation of donor kidneys. Full article