Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = C-TOPSIS-a

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 7967 KB  
Article
Evaluation of Water Richness in Sandstone Aquifers Based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of the Guojiawan Coal Mine in Fugu Mining Area, Shaanxi Province, China
by Chao Niu, Xiangqun Jia, Lele Xiao, Lei Dong, Hui Qiao, Fujing Huang, Xiping Liu, Shoutao Luo and Wanxue Qian
Water 2025, 17(10), 1424; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101424 - 9 May 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 967
Abstract
Taking the Guojiawan coal mine in the Shenfu Mining Area as a case study, five evaluation factors (aquifer thickness, brittle–plastic rock thickness ratio, core recovery rate, number of sandstone–mudstone interbeds, and fractal dimension of the faults) were selected as indicators to evaluate the [...] Read more.
Taking the Guojiawan coal mine in the Shenfu Mining Area as a case study, five evaluation factors (aquifer thickness, brittle–plastic rock thickness ratio, core recovery rate, number of sandstone–mudstone interbeds, and fractal dimension of the faults) were selected as indicators to evaluate the water richness of the sandstone aquifer in the roof strata of the main coal seam. Accordingly, the weights of the water richness evaluation indicators, derived using the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) evaluation method, were integrated with the computational procedures of the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) evaluation method. The indicator weights and evaluation approaches were combined through different fusion strategies. Finally, based on the water richness zoning results for the study area, the advantages and disadvantages of the two fusion approaches, C-TOPSIS-a and C-TOPSIS-b, were compared. Comprehensive analysis was conducted to evaluate the rationality of the water richness zoning. The C-TOPSIS-b evaluation method achieved the optimal evaluation outcome. The water richness was classified into five grades: weak, relatively weak, moderate, relatively strong, and strong. Among these, the regions with weak to relatively weak, moderate, and strong to relatively strong water richness are primarily in the northern, central, southern, and southwestern parts, respectively. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop