Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

remove_circle_outline

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Edoardo Caporusso

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 860 KiB  
Systematic Review
Correlations between Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Deficits in Individuals at First Psychotic Episode or at High Risk of Psychosis: A Systematic Review
by Antonio Melillo, Edoardo Caporusso, Giulia Maria Giordano, Luigi Giuliani, Pasquale Pezzella, Andrea Perrottelli, Paola Bucci, Armida Mucci and Silvana Galderisi
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(22), 7095; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227095 - 14 Nov 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2721
Abstract
The present review aims to identify correlations between negative symptoms (NS) and deficits in neurocognition and social cognition in subjects with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and at-high-risk populations (HR). A systematic search of the literature published between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2022 [...] Read more.
The present review aims to identify correlations between negative symptoms (NS) and deficits in neurocognition and social cognition in subjects with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and at-high-risk populations (HR). A systematic search of the literature published between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2022 was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo. Out of the 4599 records identified, a total of 32 studies met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data on a total of 3086 FEP and 1732 HR were collected. The available evidence shows that NS correlate with executive functioning and theory of mind deficits in FEP subjects, and with deficits in the processing speed, attention and vigilance, and working memory in HR subjects. Visual learning and memory do not correlate with NS in either FEP or HR subjects. More inconsistent findings were retrieved in relation to other cognitive domains in both samples. The available evidence is limited by sample and methodological heterogeneity across studies and was rated as poor or average quality for the majority of included studies in both FEP and CHR populations. Further research based on shared definitions of first-episode psychosis and at-risk states, as well as on more recent conceptualizations of negative symptoms and cognitive impairment, is highly needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Neuropsychiatric Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 601 KiB  
Systematic Review
Cognitive Impairment after Post-Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature
by Andrea Perrottelli, Noemi Sansone, Giulia Maria Giordano, Edoardo Caporusso, Luigi Giuliani, Antonio Melillo, Pasquale Pezzella, Paola Bucci, Armida Mucci and Silvana Galderisi
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(12), 2070; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122070 - 15 Dec 2022
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 3900
Abstract
The present study aims to provide a critical overview of the literature on the relationships between post-acute COVID-19 infection and cognitive impairment, highlighting the limitations and confounding factors. A systematic search of articles published from 1 January 2020 to 1 July 2022 was [...] Read more.
The present study aims to provide a critical overview of the literature on the relationships between post-acute COVID-19 infection and cognitive impairment, highlighting the limitations and confounding factors. A systematic search of articles published from 1 January 2020 to 1 July 2022 was performed in PubMed/Medline. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only studies using validated instruments for the assessment of cognitive impairment were included. Out of 5515 screened records, 72 studies met the inclusion criteria. The available evidence revealed the presence of impairment in executive functions, speed of processing, attention and memory in subjects recovered from COVID-19. However, several limitations of the literature reviewed should be highlighted: most studies were performed on small samples, not stratified by severity of disease and age, used as a cross-sectional or a short-term longitudinal design and provided a limited assessment of the different cognitive domains. Few studies investigated the neurobiological correlates of cognitive deficits in individuals recovered from COVID-19. Further studies with an adequate methodological design are needed for an in-depth characterization of cognitive impairment in individuals recovered from COVID-19. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Advance in COVID-19 and Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop