Journal of Nanotheranostics

Background: Conventional therapeutic and diagnostic approaches, despite improving clinical outcomes, remain limited by poor bioavailability, inadequate targeting, suboptimal pharmacokinetics, and systemic toxicity, particularly in complex diseases. To overcome this, nanomedicine has emerged as a transformative strategy, employing engineered nanoparticles to enhance drug stability, controlled release, targeted delivery, and diagnostic performance, thereby enabling theranostic applications. This review evaluates major nanoparticle platforms in therapy and diagnosis, comparing their mechanisms, applications, and challenges while highlighting their potential to advance precision medicine and theranostic strategies. Method: For providing the context and evidence, relevant literatures were sourced from Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect using targeted keywords including “drug delivery,” “diagnostics,” “nanoparticles,” “nanomedicine,” “nano drug delivery,” “nanotheranostics,” “targeted therapy,” “controlled drug release,” “solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs),” “lipid nano carriers (LNCs),” and “inorganic nanoparticles.” Although no strict time limit was applied during the literature search, clinical trial data were collected and analyzed up to January 2026. Given that clinical trial registries are continuously updated, the included trials represent the status at the time of data retrieval. However, it is pertinent to note that the earliest relevant studies appeared in 1973. Conclusions: This review highlights nanoparticle fundamentals, major material classes, mechanisms of action, and applications in targeted therapy, imaging, and theranostics. It also addresses translational barriers related to safety, scalability, biological complexity, and regulatory compliance. Overcoming these challenges through standardized characterization and interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial for clinical adoption. Future efforts should focus on AI-driven design, computational tools, smart nanomedicines, and advanced biosensing technologies to integrate nanoparticle-enabled precision diagnostics and therapy into routine clinical practice.

Nanotheranostic platforms integrating diagnostic and therapeutic functions within a single system have attracted significant attention in precision medicine. However, conventional nanotheranostics based on systemic administration often suffer from off-target accumulation, limited retention at disease sites, and dose-limiting toxicity. To address these limitations, hydrogel-integrated nanotheranostic systems have emerged as a promising strategy for achieving localized diagnosis and therapy with improved spatial control and safety. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in hydrogel–nanomaterial nanotheranostic platforms, focusing on their design principles, diagnostic capabilities, and therapeutic applications. We discuss the complementary roles of hydrogels and nanomaterials, where hydrogels function as localized reservoirs and tissue interfaces, and nanomaterials provide imaging and therapeutic functionalities. Key integration strategies including physical encapsulation, chemical conjugation, and in situ nanoparticle formation are systematically compared. We further summarize localized diagnostic modalities such as real-time imaging and therapy monitoring, and highlight research-driven applications in cancer treatment, inflammation and infection management, and tissue regeneration. Finally, major translational challenges and future perspectives toward personalized, image-guided local theranostics are discussed. Overall, hydrogel-based nanotheranostic platforms represent a versatile approach for next-generation localized precision medicine.

Personalized medicine aims to tailor therapy based on patient-specific molecular and biological characteristics, while nanomedicine focuses on engineering delivery systems to overcome pharmacokinetic and biological barriers. Despite major advances, both fields are limited when applied separately. This review discusses integrating patient stratification with rational nanocarrier design, a combination termed personalized nanomedicine, as a framework to maximize therapeutic index. With emphasis on clinically validated and late-stage examples, we analyze how molecular stratification informs therapeutic design, with particular focus on translational constraints and engineering trade-offs. Results: Personalized medicine enables precise target identification and patient stratification but does not address delivery barriers that limit therapeutic distribution and safety. Conversely, nanomedicine overcomes delivery challenges but exhibits patient- and disease-dependent variability. Merging these approaches allows nanocarrier design to be tailored to disease biology and patient-specific barriers to effective treatment. Recent clinically successful examples demonstrate that co-optimizing biological targeting and delivery engineering can improve translational robustness. Conclusions: Personalized nanomedicine represents a convergence of molecular stratification and engineered delivery systems, a fusion that facilitates context-dependent therapeutic design rather than one-size-fits-all formulations. While significant translational and regulatory challenges remain, treating delivery design as an integral component of personalization offers a viable path toward broader clinical implementation. Continuing to integrate patient profiling with nanoengineering principles will be essential for translating personalized nanomedicine from promising case studies into standard clinical practice.