Skip to Content

Journal of Nanotheranostics

Journal of Nanotheranostics is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on nanotheranostics published quarterly online by MDPI.
  • Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
  • High Visibility: indexed within ScopusEmbase, and other databases.
  • Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 24.6 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 5.4 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2026).
  • Recognition of Reviewers: Reviewers whose reports are timely and of high quality receive an APC discount voucher for a future publication in an MDPI journal. Become a reviewer.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (128)

Inorganic Nanoparticle-Based Theranostics for Pulmonary Diseases

  • Balaji Yadav,
  • Sannidhi Poojary and
  • Alekha K. Dash

Pulmonary diseases, including tuberculosis (TB), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, lung cancer, and pulmonary fibrosis, remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and each presents a different combination of diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Theranostic nanoparticles, which carry diagnostic and therapeutic functions in a single construct, have been proposed as a way to address both at once. Inorganic nanoparticles are attractive for this purpose because their optical, magnetic, and structural properties are tunable and because their surfaces tolerate extensive modification. The term theranostic, however, is applied inconsistently: much of the literature described as theranostic reports particles characterized for imaging or for therapy, but not for both on the same construct. This review applies an explicit three-tier definition, distinguishing shared-mechanism platforms, integrated platforms whose diagnostic and therapeutic modes act independently, and single-function platforms with theranostic potential. We use it to assess gold nanoparticles (GNPs), silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), and quantum dots (QDs) in pulmonary disease. Attention is given to lung-specific constraints: the difference between inhaled and systemic administration, aerodynamic requirements for deposition, mucus and surfactant interactions, alveolar macrophage uptake, mucociliary clearance, and barriers that differ between fibrotic, infective, inflammatory, and malignant disease. We address limitations by material class rather than generically, because the dominant risk differs among silver ion release, gold persistence, iron-mediated redox chemistry, silica dissolution, and heavy metal leaching from QD cores. Several inorganic nanoparticle formulations have regulatory approval, but pulmonary theranostic applications remain preclinical, and we outline what would be required to change that.

J. Nanotheranostics

15 September 2026

Platform-specific properties and pulmonary theranostic application of major classes of inorganic nanoparticles.

Immunotherapy can reduce treatment-related side effects but shows limited efficacy in “cold tumors,” whose immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment is characterized by abundant M2 macrophages and poor T cell infiltration. Because biopsy-based qualitative assessment of the tumor microenvironment is invasive and conventional imaging lacks functional information, this study aimed to develop an M2 macrophage-targeted theranostic agent enabling non-invasive photoacoustic (PA) imaging and pH-triggered cytotoxicity. A pullulan-based nanogel conjugated with mannose and near-infrared dye (IR-820) was further functionalized with the pH-responsive doxorubicin (DOX) prodrug, Aldoxorubicin, to develop Pullulan-mannose-IR820-Aldoxorubicin (PMID) nanogel. PMID was successfully synthesized, and the resulting self-assembled nanogels (<100 nm) exhibited a highly negative ζ-potential, near-infrared absorption peaks at 780 and 850 nm, and PA contrast comparable to IR-820 at 850 nm excitation. Dialysis studies demonstrated suppressed drug release at neutral pH (~20%) but accelerated release under acidic conditions, reaching ~80% within 48 h at pH 5.5, consistent with hydrazone hydrolysis and supporting tumor/lysosome-activated delivery. In RAW264.7 macrophages, PMID nanogel showed preferential uptake by M2-poralized versus M1-polarized macrophages, outperforming non-mannosylated PID nanogel and IR-820, and produced the strongest PA signal in M2 macrophage pellets. PMID nanogel also induced the highest concentration-dependent cytotoxicity in M2 macrophages, and microscopy indicated lysosomal accumulation of the nanogel with partial nuclear localization of released DOX. These findings support the use of PMID nanogel as M2 macrophage-targeted PA contrast agents and pH-responsive drug carriers with the potential to deplete immunosuppressive macrophages, modulate cold tumor microenvironments, and improve precision cancer theranostics.

J. Nanotheranostics

21 August 2026

Characterization of PMID nanogel. Absorption spectra of IR-820, PID nanogel and PMID nanogel in (A) HEPES buffer, (B) 1% TritonX-100 or DMSO. (C) PA imaging of HEPES buffer, IR-820 and PMID nanogel (IR-820 conc. = 10 µg/mL, λEx = 850 nm). (D) Time-dependent DOX release from PMID nanogel in different pH buffer conditions. Data are presented as mean values from pooled and concentrated dialysates (n = 3 independent trials per time point) to ensure analytical sensitivity.

Hydrogel-forming microneedles (HFMNs) are minimally invasive interfaces that access interstitial fluid (ISF) through skin penetration, swelling-mediated uptake, analyte diffusion, and hydrated sensor integration. This review examines HFMN architectures, skin–device interfaces, ISF transport, molecular-recognition and signal-transduction strategies, analytical performance, benchmarking, wear-associated failure modes, therapeutic monitoring, and translational priorities. The field has expanded from glucose sensing to metabolites, ions, hormones, proteins, nucleic acids, microbial and wound biomarkers, and therapeutic drugs, enabled by advances in hydrogel chemistry, conductive networks, nanostructured electrodes, catalysis, affinity recognition, molecular imprinting, optical readouts, and multiplexed wearables. Performance remains context dependent and requires physiological range, calibration stability, biofouling resistance, reliable insertion, validated ISF-reference correlations, and interpretable thresholds. Evidence is strongest in artificial matrices, ex vivo tissue, and animals, while human validation remains limited. Translation will require standardized mechanics and transport reporting, longer wear studies, sterilization-compatible chemistries, scalable manufacturing, and clinical validation. HFMNs may complement rather than replace blood-based diagnostics.

J. Nanotheranostics

5 August 2026

Scope positioning of HFMN-enabled ISF biosensing and therapeutic monitoring. The figure maps evidence classes along two conceptual axes: increasing platform relevance to HFMNs and increasing therapeutic proximity. Core HFMN and hydrogel-integrated ISF biosensors occupy the highest platform-relevance region, while therapeutic drug-monitoring and sensing-plus-delivery systems move toward greater therapeutic proximity. Comparator ISF microneedle biosensors and peripheral or non-ISF comparators are positioned as contextual evidence rather than central support for HFMN-enabled therapeutic monitoring. The highlighted upper-right region represents the highest-priority evidence space, where hydrogel-forming or hydrogel-integrated platforms intersect with therapeutic monitoring, delivery, or theranostic function (Prepared with the assistance of Gemini NotebookLM pro and OpenAI ChatGPT Plus).

Theranostic nanoparticles, which integrate diagnostic imaging and therapeutic delivery within a single nanoplatform, represent a transformative paradigm in oncological nanomedicine. Despite substantial preclinical progress, the field faces persistent gaps in rational nanoparticle design informed by tumor biology, preclinical model fidelity, and clinical translation. This review critically synthesizes theranostic nanoparticle research across three underexplored domains. First, we examine tumor microenvironment features—reactive oxygen species dynamics, glutathione gradients, hypoxia, and proteasomal dysregulation—as mechanistic drivers of nanoparticle responsiveness. Second, we evaluate redox-responsive and proteasome-targeted nanoplatforms that exploit these cues for stimuli-triggered drug release and simultaneous imaging readout. Third, we address the unmet need for three-dimensional organoid and microfluidic tumor models as predictive preclinical testing environments, given the well-documented limitations of conventional two-dimensional cultures. Cancer subtype-specific applications are discussed for breast cancer, HPV-associated malignancies, colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer. Clinical translation barriers—including pharmacokinetic constraints, protein corona formation, immune clearance, anti-PEG antibodies, complement activation-related pseudoallergy, and FDA/EMA regulatory pathways—are addressed from a clinical oncology perspective. The review concludes with a research roadmap integrating proteomics-guided nanoparticle engineering, patient-derived organoid biobanks, and artificial intelligence-assisted design as priority areas for next-generation oncological theranostics.

Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Activation of a Theranostic Nanoparticle. Sequential steps: (a) systemic circulation and EPR-mediated tumor accumulation, (b) extracellular ROS-triggered shell disassembly via oxidation of an arylboronic ester linker to a phenol, (c) intracellular GSH-triggered drug release via reductive cleavage of a disulfide linker, (d) simultaneous imaging signal generation. Representative chemical structures of the ROS- and GSH-responsive linkers are shown in the inset. Created in BioRender. Begüm Kurt (2026). Available at https://BioRender.com (accessed on 17 July 2026).

Featured Articles of Last Quarter

Graphical summary of the three main modes of nanoparticle targeting: passive, active, and intrinsic. Passive targeting primarily relies on the EPR effect in diseased cancerous tissues. Active targeting relies on ligands displayed on the nanoparticle surface. These ligands can be proteins, peptides, nucleic acids, polysaccharides, and small molecules. Antibodies can also be conjugated to NPs for active targeting. Intrinsic targeting can be achieved through several mechanisms, including (i) biomimetic interface-driven selectivity, (ii) inherent material-tissue affinity, (iii) physicochemical transport biases (size, shape, and charge), and (iv) mechanical properties (e.g., nanoparticle stiffness). Created in BioRender. Brownsberger, A. (2026). https://BioRender.com/8owkosy (accessed on 4 March 2026).

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

New Challenges in Ocular Drug Delivery
Reprint

New Challenges in Ocular Drug Delivery

Editors: Rosario Pignatello, Hugo Almeida, Debora Santonocito, Carmelo Puglia
XFacebookLinkedIn
J. Nanotheranostics - ISSN 2624-845X