New Trends in Ground Response Analysis and Liquefaction Assessment

Dear Colleagues,

Soil response during strong ground shaking is governed by rather complex mechanical processes, which are ascribed to hysteretic behavior associated with an increase in energy dissipation, and volumetric–distortional coupling, due to the accumulation of irreversible plastic strains induced by either volumetric responses under drained conditions or pore pressure changes under undrained conditions. The latter volumetric effects may evolve into liquefaction in loose, saturated sandy soils. The amount of soil nonlinearity mobilized during shaking controls site response and related consequences induced to structures and infrastructures, including strategic facilities like dams, ports, bridges, and pipelines.

Ground response analysis and soil liquefaction are two binding issues that have undergone a rapid evolution in recent decades due to the propulsive case studies after strong earthquakes, monitoring of test-sites, and cutting-edge experiments. The core focus, connecting these two topics in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, is the modeling of soil mechanical behavior under cyclic and dynamic loading up to the point of failure.

This Special Issue aims to collect the most recent advancements able to highlight the most prominent trends in ground response analysis and liquefaction assessment. High-quality papers are welcome which focus on, but are not limited to, discussing numerical approaches for modeling soil nonlinearity at large strains, including limitations of the equivalent linear methods, challenges of simulating excess pore water pressure in saturated soils, compatibility between soil strength and stiffness, post-liquefaction triggering behavior, and induced settlement estimation; liquefaction case studies with special emphasis on soil characterization; validation of soil modeling against experimental results; and semi-empirical methods and simplified indices that measure soil nonlinearity at a regional scale. Within the framework of synthetic methods, validation of new models and methods is particularly interesting in the range of medium-intensity earthquakes, where the efficacy of simplified approaches is more debated.

Contributions from academia and industry are encouraged to critically discuss the state of practice and define horizons for future developments.

Dr. Anna Chiaradonna
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Geotechnics is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

• ground response analysis
• liquefaction assessment
• soil nonlinearity
• excess pore-water pressure
• post-liquefaction settlement
• case-study validation
• semi-empirical index