Construction of Talent Competency Model for Senior Care Professionals in Intelligent Institutions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Competency Index Dimensions of Intelligent Institutional Senior Care Professionals
2.2. Components of Nursing Knowledge Indicators
2.3. Components of Professional Ability Indicators
2.4. Components of Professional Attitude Indicators
2.5. Components of Personal Quality Indicators
3. Research Design
3.1. Sampling and Data Collection
3.2. Research Method
3.3. Preliminary Extraction of Competency Indicators
3.4. Research Propositions
4. Data Analysis
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Data Validation
4.2.1. Exploratory Factor Analysis
4.2.2. Validation Factor Analysis
4.3. Influence Effect of Various Competency Indicators of Senior Care Professionals in Intelligent Institutions
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- It is established that a multidimensional hierarchical model of the competency of senior care professionals in intelligent institutions has a better fit than a unidimensional structural model. The results of the validation factor analysis verified that there is a high degree of matching between each competency element. The conclusion that the competency indexes of senior care professionals in intelligent senior care institutions constructed in this study are comprehensive and systematic is the same as in the results of current mainstream studies [23,24,25,26]. When establishing the competency index system, we should comprehensively consider various factors affecting competency quality and establish multidimensional structural indicators. It is more conducive to promoting the improvement of the competency quality of talents.
- (2)
- The competency model for intelligent institutional senior care professionals comprises four dimensions: nursing knowledge, professional ability, professional attitude, and personal quality are established. Among the four common factors, the significant effects were professional ability, nursing knowledge, personal quality, and professional attitude, in descending order. This finding is identical to the results of the current mainstream studies [12,15,21,22,23,24]. Intelligent institutional senior care professionals must be well-rounded. In addition to some fundamental indicators to measure them, some personal quality and attitudes indicators are needed to distinguish highly qualified personnel. Suppose one has good personal values and attitudes but does not have professional skills and basic knowledge. In that case, he or she will not be able to provide professional services to the seniors. Senior care is a particular job, and senior caregivers have low social status, low salary, and little room for promotion. It is not easy to become an excellent caregiver if they only have basic knowledge and skills but do not have the correct personal values and good attitude. Therefore, an excellent senior caregiver should be engaged in comprehensive development in all ability aspects.
- (3)
- Nursing knowledge comprises six indicators: elderly medical knowledge, elderly care knowledge, general geriatric knowledge, Internet, Internet of Things application knowledge, 5G technology, and elderly psychological knowledge. This finding is identical to the results of the current mainstream studies [11,27,28,29,30,31]. The single impact effect of these six indicators was the most significant. For senior caregivers, knowledge of all aspects of care is the most basic and essential. One could have the basic knowledge to be a caregiver, and knowledge of care is equivalent to a door knocker in the talent competency model. If institutional caregivers do not have the general knowledge necessary for caregiving, they are not qualified as caregivers. Moreover, intelligent nursing is different from general nursing, and caregivers should master the knowledge of the Internet. It is essential to train caregivers’ basic knowledge. Schools and medical institutions should work together to develop a good training program and determine the program for training nursing talents. Basic nursing knowledge of caregivers is essential to improve the quality of caregivers. Since many disabled and disabled seniors are in nursing homes, caregivers should also have some general knowledge of psychology to serve these seniors better.
- (4)
- Professional ability comprises nine indicators: intelligent elderly service ability, intelligent life care ability, intelligent rehabilitation guidance ability, intelligent security monitoring ability, intelligent health monitoring ability, intelligent information management ability, interpersonal relationship ability, intelligent psychological support ability, and intelligent emergency handling ability. These indicators are valid except for the two indicators of ability to hold online and offline association and intelligent online health and medical knowledge training, which are assumed to be invalid. This dimension has the most significant overall impact and is the most important in the competency system framework. With the basic knowledge, one could learn to apply them and can apply them in a practical context in order to further perform well as a caregiver. This conclusion is identical to most current studies [19,32,33,34,35,36,37]. In addition to nursing knowledge, professional ability is also an essential fundamental factor in measuring the performance of nursing staff. Unlike traditional care services, intelligent caregivers could have the ability to provide intelligent services and use intelligent devices to better assist them in serving the senior population. In addition to caring for the seniors, they should also have interpersonal skills to better coordinate with their families. Nowadays, most intelligent devices still exist only for primary products, so caregivers should also have the ability of psychological counseling. This finding is different from the findings of some scholars [9,29]. These scholars believe that nursing staff should have the ability to hold networking events and online lectures, but this study removed it during the exploratory factor analysis. The ability to hold events came under this study’s intelligent psychological support ability indicator. According to Davis et al. (2005) [29], the ability to organize activities and lectures are qualities that managers in nursing homes could possess, and caregivers could do their jobs. Furukawa and Kashiwagi (2021) [46] suggest that managers in nursing homes could have the ability to emphasize the organization of activities and lectures among seniors and could have the ability to organize and coordinate the relationship between caregivers and seniors.
- (5)
- Professional attitude comprises seven indicators: service awareness, hard-working, disciplined and law-abiding, respect for elderly privacy, equality and fraternity, dedication to work, and professional self-awareness and improvement. Except for the indicator sense of honor, these indicators hold. Caregivers could have an excellent professional attitude to ensure an enthusiastic and positive approach to their work. This conclusion is identical to most current studies [41,42,43,44]. Nursing workers care for the senior population with various physical or psychological illnesses in senior care institutions, so they could have this sense of good service and love for their work to serve the senior population well. This conclusion is different from some conclusions of others [47,48], who believe that the sense of honor is also a vital component indicator. Zhao and Liu (2021) [49] believe that nurses are mostly senior women with low psychological resistance, insufficient physical strength, and poor learning and acceptance of new things. The lack of a hard-working spirit leads to a poor turnover rate.
- (6)
- Personal quality comprises six indicators: physical strength, responsibility, ability to resist stress, psychological support, honesty and integrity, provide personalized service patience. All the indicators are valid. This finding is identical to the current mainstream research findings [11,35,51]. If each caregiver only has some essential qualities and does not have a sense of enterprise himself/herself, then the overall nursing profession will not make significant progress, and it will not be conducive to improving the quality of nursing staff competencies. Spencer and Spencer (2008) [20] suggested that these factors of personal quality are the essential indicators to differentiate talents. Due to the unique nature of nursing, caregivers should have enough physical strength to care for some special seniors. Caregivers are in a high-pressure profession. The stressful situation of caregivers is detrimental to the health of caregivers, so they should have the ability to resist stress [51]. Since seniors have different needs and different physical conditions, they could have the patience to provide them with individualized services.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Your gender:
- □ Male □ Female
- Your age:
- □ <30 □ 30–40 □ >40
- Your education:
- □ Primary School □ Junior High School □ High School
- □ College and above
- Your Working years:
- □ ≥1 □ <1
Number | Title | Total Disagree–Total Agree | ||||
1 | Elderly medical knowledge | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2 | Elderly care knowledge | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
3 | General geriatric knowledge | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
4 | Internet, Internet of Things application knowledge | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
5 | 5G technology | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
6 | Elderly psychological knowledge | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
7 | Intelligent elderly service ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
8 | Intelligent life care ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
9 | Intelligent rehabilitation guidance ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
10 | Intelligent security monitoring ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
11 | Intelligent health monitoring ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
12 | Intelligent information management ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
13 | Interpersonal relationship ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
14 | Intelligent psychological support ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
15 | Intelligent emergency handling ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
16 | Holding online and offline association activities ability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
17 | Intelligent online health and medical knowledge training | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
18 | Service awareness | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
19 | Hard-working | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
20 | Disciplined and law-abiding | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
21 | Respect for elderly privacy | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
22 | Equality and fraternity | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
23 | Dedication to work | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
24 | Professional self-awareness and improvement | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
25 | Sense of honor | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
26 | Physical strength | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
27 | Responsibility | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
28 | Ability to resist stress | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
29 | Psychological support | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
30 | Honesty and integrity | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
31 | Provide personalized service patience | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
References
- Nathan, V.; Paul, S.; Prioleau, T.; Niu, L.; Mortazavi, B.J.; Cambone, S.A.; Veeraraghavan, A.; Sabharwal, A.; Jafari, R. A survey on smart homes for aging in place: Toward solutions to the specific needs of the elderly. IEEE Signal Processing Mag. 2018, 35, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Z.; Liu, C.; Guan, X.; Mor, V. China’s rapidly aging population creates policy challenges in shaping a viable long-term care system. Health Aff. 2012, 31, 2764–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stolt, R.; Blomqvist, P.; Winblad, U. Privatization of social services: Quality differences in Swedish elderly care. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011, 72, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, L.; Liu, C.; Woldum, E.; Au-Yeung, A.; Berndt, A.; Wallsworth, C.; Horne, N.; Gregorio, M.; Mann, J.; Chaudhury, H. The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: A scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2019, 19, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zhan, H. Willingness and expectations: Intergenerational differences in attitudes toward filial responsibility in China. Marriage Fam. Rev. 2004, 36, 175–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampson, E.L.; White, N.; Leurent, B.; Scott, S.; Lord, K.; Round, J.; Jones, L. Behavioural and psychiatric symptoms in people with dementia admitted to the acute hospital: Prospective cohort study. Br. J. Psychiatry 2014, 205, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satariano, W.A.; Scharlach, A.E.; Lindeman, D. Aging, place, and technology: Toward improving access and wellness in older populations. J. Aging Health 2014, 26, 1373–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ienca, M.; Jotterand, F.; Vică, C.; Elger, B. Social and assistive robotics in dementia care: Ethical recommendations for research and practice. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2016, 8, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Lian, N. Institutional Intelligent Care Service and the Satisfaction of the Elderly: Empirical Evidence from Baotou City. Chin. J. Popul. Sci. 2019, 33, 112–125. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Sun, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, J. Build a smart elderly care service platform that combines medical care and elderly care under the “Healthy China” strategy. Chin. Mark. 2021, 28, 53–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szczerbińska, K.E.; Topór-Mądry, R.; Niedźwiedzka, B. Competence profile of an in-house educator of professionals providing elderly care (ComPro project). Nurse Educ. Today 2012, 32, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, C. An exploration of core competences of newly qualified nurses: A case study. Qual. Quant. 2014, 48, 767–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Oouyang, C. Systematic review of Chinese and international research on service quality evaluation index systems of elderly care institutions. Chin. J. Health Policy 2020, 13, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, L. A brief discussion on the core qualities and basic competencies that nursing staff should possess. Chin. Manip. Rehabil. Med. 2016, 7, 72–73. [Google Scholar]
- Whelan, L. Competency assessment of nursing staff. Orthop. Nurs. 2006, 25, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, N.; Huo, C.; Xu, G.; Ping, H.; Zhang, T.; Li, Z. The Effectof Artificial Intelligence Application on the Quality of Elderly Care—Evidence from Survey Data in Hangzhou, Hefei and Wuhan. Soc. Secur. Stud. 2021, 14, 72–80. [Google Scholar]
- Backhaus, R.; Verbeek, H.; van Rossum, E.; Capezuti, E.; Hamers, J.P. Nurse staffing impact on quality of care in nursing homes: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2014, 15, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- André, B.; Sjøvold, E.; Rannestad, T.; Ringdal, G.I. The impact of work culture on quality of care in nursing homes–A review study. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2014, 28, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McClelland, D.C. Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. Am. Psychol. 1973, 28, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spencer, L.M.; Spencer, P.S.M. Competence at Work Models for Superior Performance; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Du, F.; Luo, Z. On the Competency Research Both at Home and abroad Citespace. J. Huaqiao Univ. 2016, 34, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaughn, S.; Mauk, K.L.; Jacelon, C.S.; Larsen, P.D.; Rye, J.; Wintersgill, W.; Cave, C.E.; Dufresne, D. The competency model for professional rehabilitation nursing. Rehabil. Nurs. 2016, 41, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stanyon, M.R.; Goldberg, S.E.; Astle, A.; Griffiths, A.; Gordon, A.L. The competencies of Registered Nurses working in care homes: A modified Delphi study. Age Ageing 2017, 46, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Campbell, L.A.; Harmon, M.J.; Joyce, B.L.; Little, S.H. Quad Council Coalition community/public health nursing competencies: Building consensus through collaboration. Public Health Nurs. 2020, 37, 96–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, L.; Zhang, J.; Xu, B.; Tang, S.; Hou, J.; Ma, M.; Shi, Z. Construction of the competency model for junior caregivers for the elderly based on the combination of medical and endowment model. J. Cent. South Univ. 2018, 43, 679–684. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X. Construction and Application of Competency Index System for Elderly Care Nursing Staff—Based on an Investigation of 396 Elderly Care Staffs. China Bus. Mark. 2021, 35, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groenewoud, S.; Van Exel NJ, A.; Bobinac, A.; Berg, M.; Huijsman, R.; Stolk, E.A. What influences patients’ decisions when choosing a health care provider? Measuring preferences of patients with knee arthrosis, chronic depression, or Alzheimer’s disease, using discrete choice experiments. Health Serv. Res. 2015, 50, 1941–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M.; Jiang, A. Construction of framework model of competency standard for baccalaureate nursing education. Chin. J. Nurs. 2009, 44, 536–538. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, D.; Stullenbarger, E.; Dearman, C.; Kelley, J.A. Proposed nurse educator competencies: Development and validation of a model. Nurs. Outlook 2005, 53, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tous, C.N.; Almansa, H.A.; González, B.G.J.; Zamora, T.D. Perceived quality in hospitals of the Andalusia Healthcare System. The case of neurosurgery departments. Rev. De Calid. Asist. 2014, 29, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Zhang, Z. Research on “Internet Plus” Based Aged Service Model and Its Development Path. J. Soc. Sci. Hunan Norm. Univ. 2019, 48, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulas, A.L.; Crandall, A.S.; Schmitter-Edgecombe, M.; Cook, D.J. Caregiver needs from elder care assistive smart homes: Nursing assessment. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 2012, 56, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.H.; Hwang, Y.S. A study on the utility conditions and user satisfaction of leisure and culture facilities in senior welfare centers. Des. Converg. Study 2013, 12, 363–382. [Google Scholar]
- Daniel, K.M.; Cason, C.L.; Ferrell, S. Emerging technologies to enhance the safety of older people in their homes. Geriatr. Nurs. 2009, 30, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, X. A Mode Research on “Artificial Intelligence+Pension” Service. J. Xi’an Univ. Financ. Econ. 2020, 33, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robson, A. Intelligent machines, care work and the nature of practical reasoning. Nurs. Ethics 2019, 26, 1906–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubbard, G.; Tester, S.; Downs, M.G. Meaningful social interactions between older people in institutional care settings. Ageing Soc. 2003, 23, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Siegel, C.; Hochgatterer, A.; Dorner, T.E. Contributions of ambient assisted living for health and quality of life in the elderly and care services-a qualitative analysis from the experts’ perspective of care service professionals. BMC Geriatr. 2014, 14, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Haeusermann, T. Professionalised intimacy: How dementia care workers navigate between domestic intimacy and institutional detachment. Sociol. Health Illn. 2018, 40, 907–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van der Dam, S.; Molewijk, B.; Widdershoven, G.A.M.; Abma, T.A. Ethics support in institutional elderly care: A review of the literature. J. Med. Ethics 2014, 40, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, E.O.C.; Hoy, B. Re-establishing dignity: Nurses’ experiences of caring for older hospital patients. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2012, 26, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Backhaus, P. Politeness in institutional elderly care in Japan: A cross-cultural comparison. J. Politeness Res-Lan. 2009, 5, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smart, D.; English, A.; James, J.; Wilson, M.; Daratha, K.B.; Childers, B.; Magera, C. Compassion fatigue and satisfaction: A cross-sectional survey among US healthcare workers. Nurs. Health Sci. 2014, 16, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, H. Shortage of elderly personnel: New challenges in an elderly society. Chin. Talent. 2014, 29, 32–33. [Google Scholar]
- Su, W.; Xu, Z. The challenges of artificial intelligence to the legal system of elderly services and its improvement path. Ningxia Soc. Sci. 2021, 40, 77–85. [Google Scholar]
- Furukawa, A.; Kashiwagi, K. The relationship between leadership behaviours of ward nurse managers and teamwork competency of nursing staff: A cross-sectional study in Japanese hospitals. J. Nurs. Manag. 2021, 29, 2056–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powers, E.T.; Powers, N.J. Causes of caregiver turnover and the potential effectiveness of wage subsidies for solving the long-term care workforce “crisis”. BE J. Econ. Anal. Policy 2010, 10, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nonnis, M.; Mura, A.L.; Scrima, F.; Cuccu, S.; Fornara, F. The Moderation of Perceived Comfort and Relations with Patients in the Relationship between Secure Workplace Attachment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Elderly Facilities Staff. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Liu, X. The Influencing Factors of Turnover Intention of Elderly Care Workers: Based on Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Popul. Econ. 2021, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosher-Ashley, R.R.P.M. Factors influencing college students to choose careers working with elderly persons. Educ. Gerontol. 2000, 26, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanste, O.; Miettunen, J.; Kyngäs, H. Factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among Finnish nursing staff. Nurs. Health Sci. 2006, 8, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Competency Characteristics | Frequency | Score | |
---|---|---|---|
Average Value | Standard Deviation | ||
Intelligent life care ability | 40 | 4.821 | 0.573 |
Elderly care knowledge | 40 | 4.714 | 0.544 |
Elderly medical knowledge | 40 | 4.723 | 0.534 |
Intelligent rehabilitation guidance ability | 39 | 4.629 | 0.461 |
Intelligent emergency handling ability | 38 | 4.636 | 0.513 |
Intelligent elderly service ability | 36 | 4.591 | 0.392 |
Internet, Internet of Things application knowledge | 36 | 4.543 | 0.618 |
5G technology | 34 | 4.576 | 0.618 |
General geriatric knowledge | 33 | 4.627 | 0.734 |
Intelligent psychological support ability | 33 | 4.526 | 0.572 |
Psychological support | 32 | 4.564 | 0.834 |
Intelligent security monitoring ability | 30 | 4.352 | 0.658 |
Intelligent health monitoring ability | 30 | 4.323 | 0.752 |
Dedication to work | 30 | 4.358 | 0.733 |
Ability to resist stress | 30 | 4.387 | 0.524 |
Respect for elderly privacy | 30 | 4.353 | 0.672 |
Intelligent online health and medical knowledge training | 29 | 4.412 | 0.642 |
Intelligent information management ability | 28 | 4.424 | 0.649 |
Holding online and offline association activities ability | 28 | 4.526 | 0.568 |
Physical strength | 27 | 4.432 | 0.731 |
Interpersonal relationship ability | 26 | 4.314 | 0.782 |
Responsibility | 26 | 4.319 | 0.648 |
Service awareness | 25 | 4.279 | 0.813 |
Disciplined and law-abiding | 25 | 4.313 | 0.723 |
Provide personalized service patience | 24 | 4.242 | 0.822 |
Hard-working | 23 | 4.218 | 0.753 |
Equality and fraternity | 23 | 4.226 | 0.692 |
Honesty and integrity | 23 | 4.212 | 0.678 |
Sense of honor | 23 | 4.201 | 0.663 |
Professional self-awareness and improvement | 21 | 4.153 | 0.724 |
Elderly psychological knowledge | 21 | 4.127 | 0.923 |
Scientific research management ability * | 16 | ||
Literature search ability * | 14 | ||
Nursing experience * | 13 | ||
Job achievement * | 10 |
Serial Number | Competency Elements | Definition |
---|---|---|
1 | Elderly medical knowledge | Caregivers master geriatrics pathology, physiology, and pathogenesis and common geriatric diseases. |
2 | Elderly care knowledge | Caregivers acquire knowledge of rehabilitation and regular disease care for the elderly. |
3 | General geriatric knowledge | Caregivers know the causes, treatment, and prevention of common geriatric diseases. |
4 | Internet, Internet of Things application knowledge | Caregivers are skilled in helping seniors operate various intelligent electronic devices and intelligent wearable devices. |
5 | 5G technology | Caregivers use 5G technology to assist with intelligent products and services that seniors are willing to use in terms of innovative products. |
6 | Elderly psychological knowledge | Caregivers have the knowledge to determine the state of various aspects of senior psychology. |
7 | Intelligent elderly service ability | Caregivers can provide nursing, treatment, and care services for the seniors based on intelligent devices and intelligent senior care service platforms. |
8 | Intelligent life care ability | Caregivers have skills in caring for senior citizens in daily life, daily information pushing, and daily care. |
9 | Intelligent rehabilitation guidance ability | Caregivers have skills in essential medication, rehabilitation training and post-operative health monitoring, and rehabilitation guidance for senior citizens through intelligent terminal devices. |
10 | Intelligent security monitoring ability | Caregivers have the skills to use intelligent monitoring devices to monitor the daily activities of the seniors and the safety of their activities. |
11 | Intelligent health monitoring ability | Caregivers can use various intelligent devices to monitor senior citizens’ heart rate, blood pressure, and other vital signs indicators. |
12 | Intelligent information management ability | Caregivers’ skills to manage various data and information on seniors using an intelligent platform. |
13 | Interpersonal relationship ability | Caregiver skills to communicate with family members of senior citizens. |
14 | Intelligent psychological support ability | Caregivers can interact more with the seniors through intelligent devices and psychological counseling skills. |
15 | Intelligent emergency handling ability | Caregivers can apply the information received through the web platform, and caregivers carry out the emergency rescue service skills at home. |
16 | Holding online and offline association activities ability | Caregivers have skills in organizing structured online and offline activities for seniors. |
17 | Intelligent online health and medical knowledge training. | Caregivers have skills in online consultation response, online medical and health training |
18 | Service awareness | Caregivers can provide care to seniors in a warm, attentive, and proactive manner. |
19 | Hard-working | Caregivers can withstand the hard work of nursing and work long hours under exceptional circumstances. |
20 | Disciplined and law-abiding | Caregivers can strictly comply with regulations, penal laws, and professional ethics. |
21 | Respect for elderly privacy | Caregivers are fully aware of the need to protect the privacy of the seniors and not disclose their private information. |
22 | Equality and fraternity | Caregivers are caring and compassionate and treat the seniors they care for equally. |
23 | Dedication to work | Caregivers can provide care to seniors in a caring, respectful, and disciplined manner. |
24 | Professional self-awareness and improvement | Caregivers have the attitude of constantly learning about nursing and improving their cognitive skills. |
25 | Sense of honor | An individual perceived emotion of nobility that arises when caregivers feel integrated into the institutional care environment. |
26 | Physical strength | Caregivers have the physical strength to support and move the paralyzed seniors. |
27 | Responsibility | Caregivers can conscientiously and responsibly provide care services to seniors. |
28 | Ability to resist stress | Caregivers can de-stress when caring for disabled and semi-disabled seniors. |
29 | Psychological support | Caregivers can maintain an optimistic mindset in caring for seniors. |
30 | Honesty and integrity | The caregiver cares for the senior according to the way things are, without being influenced by personal interests, likes or dislikes, and keeping promises. |
31 | Provide personalized service patience | Caregivers patiently treat seniors with different needs and conditions with personalized service. |
Variable | Category | Number of People (n) | Composition Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | male | 24 | 4.86 |
female | 470 | 95.14 | |
Age (years) | <30 | 47 | 9.51 |
30–40 | 217 | 43.93 | |
>40 | 230 | 46.56 | |
Education level | primary school | 60 | 12.15 |
junior high school | 167 | 33.81 | |
high school | 240 | 48.58 | |
Junior college and above | 27 | 5.47 | |
Years of work (years) | ≥1 | 197 | 39.88 |
<1 | 297 | 60.12 |
Factor | Initial Eigenvalue | Sum of Squared Rotating Loads | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Variance % | Cumulative Percentage % | Total | Variance % | Cumulative Percentage % | ||
1 | Nursing knowledge | 4.971 | 16.034 | 16.034 | 4.588 | 14.799 | 14.799 |
2 | Professional ability | 6.494 | 20.950 | 36.984 | 6.131 | 19.777 | 34.576 |
3 | Professional attitude | 4.135 | 13.338 | 50.322 | 4.065 | 13.111 | 47.687 |
4 | Personal quality | 3.186 | 10.276 | 60.598 | 4.002 | 12.910 | 60.597 |
Parameter Items | X2/df | RMSEA | GFI | AGFI | NNFI | TLI | CFI | IFI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2.778 | 0.060 | 0.861 | 0.837 | 0.920 | 0.943 | 0.947 | 0.948 |
First Order Factor | Observed Variable | Impact Effect |
---|---|---|
Nursing knowledge (0.249) | A1 Elderly medical knowledge (0.175) | 0.0435 |
A2 Elderly care knowledge (0.175) | 0.0436 | |
A3 General geriatric knowledge (0.162) | 0.0403 | |
A4 Internet, Internet of Things application knowledge (0.169) | 0.0420 | |
A5 5G technology (0.167) | 0.0416 | |
A6 Elderly psychological knowledge (0.151) | 0.0377 | |
Professional ability (0.271) | B1 Intelligent elderly service ability (0.124) | 0.0335 |
B2 Intelligent life care ability (0.118) | 0.320 | |
B3 Intelligent rehabilitation guidance ability (0.104) | 0.0281 | |
B4 Intelligent security monitoring ability (0.103) | 0.0279 | |
B5 Intelligent health monitoring ability (0.102) | 0.0277 | |
B6 Intelligent information management ability (0.1) | 0.0270 | |
B7 Interpersonal relationship ability (0.116) | 0.0313 | |
B8 Intelligent psychological support ability (0.116) | 0.0315 | |
B9 Intelligent emergency handling ability (0.117) | 0.0317 | |
Professional attitude (0.238) | C1 Service awareness (0.151) | 0.0359 |
C2 Hard-working (0.142) | 0.0338 | |
C3 Disciplined and law-abiding (0.149) | 0.0354 | |
C4 Respect for elderly privacy (0.163) | 0.0388 | |
C5 Equality and fraternity (0.121) | 0.0289 | |
C6 Dedication to work (0.127) | 0.0302 | |
C7 Professional self-awareness and improvement (0.148) | 0.0352 | |
Personal quality (0.242) | D1 Physical strength (0.167) | 0.0389 |
D2 Responsibility (0.166) | 0.0386 | |
D3 Ability to resist stress (0.17) | 0.0396 | |
D4 Psychological support (0.168) | 0.0391 | |
D5 Honesty and integrity (0.161) | 0.0375 | |
D6 Provide personalized service patience (0.167) | 0.0388 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Song, Y.; Chun, D.; Xiong, P.; Wang, X. Construction of Talent Competency Model for Senior Care Professionals in Intelligent Institutions. Healthcare 2022, 10, 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050914
Song Y, Chun D, Xiong P, Wang X. Construction of Talent Competency Model for Senior Care Professionals in Intelligent Institutions. Healthcare. 2022; 10(5):914. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050914
Chicago/Turabian StyleSong, Yu, Dongphil Chun, Peng Xiong, and Xinyuan Wang. 2022. "Construction of Talent Competency Model for Senior Care Professionals in Intelligent Institutions" Healthcare 10, no. 5: 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050914
APA StyleSong, Y., Chun, D., Xiong, P., & Wang, X. (2022). Construction of Talent Competency Model for Senior Care Professionals in Intelligent Institutions. Healthcare, 10(5), 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050914