Name: Prof. Zhihui He
Affiliation: School of Medicine, Southeast University, China
Research interests: gating regulation mechanisms of large-pore Pannexin ion channels, mitochondrial MRS2 channels, and ion-channel-type neurotransmitter receptors; physiological and pathological functions mediated by these channels; and development of therapeutic strategies targeting these specific molecules.

1. How does receiving this award resonate with you, and what does it mean for your journey in peer review?
   I am very happy and honored to receive this award. It is a meaningful recognition of my efforts and encourages me to continue contributing to the scientific community.
2. What key aspects do you prioritize when evaluating a manuscript?
   I primarily focus on the originality of the ideas and the rigor of the logic. A strong manuscript should present novel insights supported by clear and well-structured arguments.
3. What common weaknesses do you see in academic writing, and how can authors improve the reviewability of their manuscripts?
   I think one common weakness in academic writing is the lack of clarity and standard English writing conventions. To improve the reviewability of their manuscripts, authors can read other reviewers’ comments. Learning from the review styles of experienced and leading scientists can also be helpful.
4. How has reviewing others’ work informed or shaped your own research?
   Reviewing others’ work has provided me with valuable insights into both my own strengths and weaknesses. It helps me identify areas where I can improve.
5. With AI-assisted writing and detection tools on the rise, how do you envision the future of peer review?
   With the rise of AI-assisted writing and detection tools, peer review will increasingly require reviewers to rely on their own expertise, research experience, and unique perspectives that AI alone cannot provide.