
Applied Sciences Exceptional Reviewers List 2025
We are thrilled to share the updated Exceptional Reviewers List 2025, which was designed to recognize and honor scholars who have delivered consistently exceptional review reports to our journal. Committed to fostering rigorous research and promoting the exchange of knowledge, Applied Sciences (ISSN: 2076-3417) recognizes the significant role our reviewers play in maintaining the quality and integrity of the articles we publish. According to surveys conducted in 2024, 92% of our authors rated the peer-review process as good or excellent, thanks to our pool of excellent reviewers.
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the reviewers who have devoted their time and expertise to assist in Applied Sciences’ peer-review process. Their dedication and attention to detail in evaluating manuscripts, offering insightful feedback, and helping to ensure the academic rigor of all published articles are much appreciated.
The Exceptional Reviewers List was introduced in May 2024. Each quarter, we will select a group of outstanding reviewers and introduce them here.
Q2
|
Name: Dr. Nay Lin Oo |
Name: Prof. Dr. Gabriel Marín Díaz |
|
Name: Dr. Paweł Rydzewski |
Name: Dr. Bireswar Dutta |
|
Name: Dr. Tatiana Moschovou |
Name: Dr. Gennaro Di Meo |
|
Name: Dr. Hiroyuki Ishimori |
Name: Dr. Adina Oana Armencia |
|
Name: Dr. Tahir Cetin Akinci |
Name: Dr. Elisavet Bouloumpasi |
|
Name: Dr. Jan Dizo |
Name: Prof. Dr. Yuke Wang |
|
Name: Dr. Hongliang Luo |
Name: Dr. Alireza Tabrizikahou |
|
Name: Dr. Mohammad Roshan |
Name: Dr. Alberto Ubaldini |
|
Name: Dr. Dariusz Obracaj |
Name: Dr. Yuchen Wang |
|
Name: Dr. Mohamed C. Ghanem |
Name: Dr. Stefano Nejrotti |
|
Name: Dr. Zhan Gao |
Name: Dr. Shafaq Sahar |
|
Name: Dr. Jakub Górski |
Name: Dr Jagoda Jablonska |
|
Name: Dr. Stefano Cascone |
Name: Prof. Dr. Václav Uruba |
|
Name: Dr. Jacek Abramczyk |
Name: Dr. Lihang Feng |
|
Name: Dr. Alessandro Cantelli-Forti |
Name: Dr. Michael Kent |
|
Name: Dr. Lingyue Ma |
Name: Dr. Francesco Bono |
|
Name: Dr. Kang Xu |
Name: Dr. Aneta Cegiełka |
|
Name: Dr. Delika Weragoda |
Name: Dr. Eleonora Balliana |
|
Name: Dr. Jun Ye |
Name: Dr. Jinyang Li |
|
Name: Dr. Robert Karpiński |
Name: Dr. Salvatore Ponte |
|
Name: Dr. Sara Frazzini |
Name: Dr. Michał Łobacz |
|
Name: Dr. Bahadar S. Srichawla |
Name: Prof. Dr. Konrad Wojciechowski |
|
Name: Dr. Magdalena Zaborowska |
Name: Dr. Hanzhou Wu |
|
Name: Dr. Marta Kałuża |
Name: Prof. Dr. Danuta Król |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Haitao Zhao |
Name: Dr. Richárd Wéber |
See what our reviewers have to say about Applied Sciences’ review process:
|
“My review experience is fully rewarding: it allows me to follow current research in my field while doing my best to support authors by sharing my expertise.”—Prof. Dr. Gabriel Marín Díaz |
|
“The review process is very smooth. The instructions are mentioned clearly. The communication with the official is very prominent. A great experience overall! Highly recommend.”—Dr. Bireswar Dutta |
|
“My review experience centers on geotechnical engineering, including studies on ground subsidence and slope failures via experiments and simulations, as well as theoretical models employing advanced mathematics.”—Dr. Hiroyuki Ishimori |
|
“Regarding my experience as a reviewer, I consider peer review to be an essential commitment for promoting quality and innovation in science, giving me the satisfaction of supporting the scientific community and ensuring the quality of publications.”—Dr. Adina Oana Armencia |
|
“I focus on whether studies are written with scientific rigor, apply current methods, and contribute meaningfully to the literature with both theoretical and applied insights.”—Dr. Tahir Cetin Akinci |
|
“Reviewing for the journal has been a rewarding experience, contributing to the advancement of high-quality scientific research.”—Dr. Elisavet Bouloumpasi |
|
“As a Reviwer in Journal of Applied Sciences, I enjoy reading and providing constructive feedback to the new and innorvate ideas that reflect the novelty of the journal.”—Dr. Nay Lin Oo |
|
“It is a privilege to assist your journal. My reviews are modest in tone and oriented to practical improvements—especially around methods and reproducibility in FRC, SMA, and computational mechanics.”—Dr. Alireza Tabrizikahou |
|
“I'm very happy to have contributed to the review process. It was helpful because it allowed me to learn new topics and stay up-to-date. Everything was well-managed by the editor, and I hope to be a reviewer again in the future.”—Dr. Alberto Ubaldini |
|
“With over 300 article reviews completed for various journals, I bring substantial experience to the table. MDPI is dedicated to delivering an exceptional review process and providing excellent support to its reviewers. The remote review submission system is not only transparent but also highly user-friendly. I am confident in the continued success of Applied Sciences.”—Dr. Dariusz Obracaj |
|
“Peer review is an important aspect of the academic community. I will continue to provide objective and rigorous reviewing to ensure the quality of manuscripts for Applied Sciences.”—Dr. Yuchen Wang |
Q1
| Name: Dr. Patryk Ziolkowski Affiliation: Gdansk University of Technology, Poland |
Name: Prof. Dr. Paweł Pijarski Affiliation: Lublin University of Technology, Poland |
| Name: Dr. Adrian Peidro Affiliation: Miguel Hernandez University, Spain |
Name: Dr. Andreea Kui Affiliation: “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania |
| Name: Dr. Roberto Lo Giudice Affiliation: University of Messina, Italy |
Name: Dr. Radovan Holubek Affiliation: Slovak University of Technology, Slovakia |
| Name: Dr. Gessica Umili Affiliation: Torino University, Italy |
Name: Dr. Zhao Ding Affiliation: Chongqing University, China |
| Name: Dr. Stefano Quer Affiliation: Politecnico di Torino, Italy |
Name: Prof. Dr. Papageorgas Panagiotis Affiliation: University of West Attica, Greece |
| Name: Dr. Zheng Cao Affiliation: Xi'an Jiaotong University, China |
Name: Dr. Laura Zlibinaite Affiliation: Kauno Kolegija Higher Education Institution, Lithuania |
| Name: Prof. Dr. Daniela Perduková Affiliation: Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia |
Name: Prof. Dr. Maciej Sydor Affiliations: 1.Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland ; 2. Poznań University of Technology, Poland |
| Name: Prof. Dr. Magdalena Gantner Affiliation: Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS), Poland |
Name: Dr. Dawid Szatten Affiliation: Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland |
| Name: Dr. Weike Wang Affiliation: Shandong University of Science and Technology, China |
Name: Dr. Konstantinos Papadimitriou Affiliation: University of East London, Greece |
| Name: Dr. Ramanjaneyulu Rayala Affiliation: University of Illinois Chicago, USA |
Name: Prof. Dr. Lianguo Wang Affiliation: China University of Mining and Technology, China |
| Name: Dr. Juan Luis Cabanillas García Affiliation: Universidad de Extremadura, Spain |
Name: Dr. Do-Youn Lee Affiliation: Kookmin University, Republic of Korea |
| Name: Prof. Dr. Anna Rudawska Affiliation: Lublin University of Technology, Poland |
Name: Prof. Dr. Roman Trach Affiliation: Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland |
| Name: Prof. Dr. O. Roger Anderson Affiliation: Columbia University, USA |
Name: Prof. Dr. Carlos Roldán-Blay Affiliation: Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain |
| Name: Prof. Dr. Martin Decký Affiliation: University of Žilina, Slovakia |
Name: Dr. Daniele Sofia Affiliation: University of Calabria, Italy |
| Name: Dr. Rocco Citroni Affiliation: Sapienza University of Rome, Italy |
Name: Dr. Sanda Rosca Affiliation: Babeş-Bolyai University, Romania |
| Name: Prof. Dr. Xueming Du Affiliation: Zhengzhou University, China |
Name: Dr. Zhen Liu Affiliation: Pennsylvania State University, USA |
| Name: Dr. Łukasz Knypiński Affiliation: Poznan University of Technology, Poland |
Name: Dr. Ruizhe Yang Affiliation: University of Chicago, USA |
| Name: Prof. Dr. Anna Lekova Affiliation: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria |
Name: Prof. Dr. Robert Ulewicz Affiliation: Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland |
| Name: Dr. José Carlos Piñar-Fuentes Affiliation: University of Jaen, Spain |
Name: Dr. Jorge Calvillo-Arbizu Affiliation: University of Seville, Spain |
| Name: Dr. Elias Sakellis Affiliation: National Center for Scientific Research (NCSR) Demokritos, Greece |
Name: Prof. Dr. Leszek Sobkowiak Affiliation: Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland |
| Name: Dr. Babak Jamhiri Affiliation: Loughborough University, UK |
Name: Prof. Dr. Belmiro P. M. Duarte Affiliation: Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Coimbra, Portugal |
| Name: Dr. Gabriela Ionescu Affiliation: National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Romania |
Name: Prof. Dr. Jang-Eui Hong Affiliation: Chungbuk National University, Republic of Korea |
| Name: Dr. Ramona Riedel Affiliation: BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany |
Name: Dr. Assunta Pozzuoli Affiliation: University of Padova, Italy |
| Name: Prof. Dr. Theodoros Theodosiou Affiliation: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece |
Name: Dr. Maria Francesca Ferrario Affiliation: Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Italy |
| Name: Dr. Malgorzata Kac Affiliation: Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland |
Name: Dr. Wei-jung Shiang Affiliation: Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan |
See what our reviewers have to say about Applied Sciences’ review process:
| “Peer review is a valuable opportunity to contribute to scientific rigor while staying engaged with emerging research in my field.”—Dr. Andreea Kui |
| “It is a pleasure to contribute to the peer-review process, supporting the advancement of scientific research. The review platform is very user-friendly, and the star rating system works well, providing a clear idea of the article’s qualities. I believe that integrating a plagiarism detection tool would be beneficial to further support reviewers in verifying the originality of submitted manuscripts.”—Dr. Roberto Lo Giudice |
| “Serving as a reviewer for a critical journal is a significant responsibility underpinning our field's integrity and advancement. It requires a diligent and objective assessment of a manuscript's originality, methodological rigor, clarity, and contribution to existing knowledge. Beyond critical evaluation, a key responsibility is to provide constructive, insightful, and actionable feedback that helps authors improve their work, regardless of the ultimate publication decision, thereby fostering scholarly excellence and upholding the journal's high standards.”—Dr. Stefano Quer |
| “The MDPI platform has helped me a lot in performing the review. I have the capability of interacting with One important point is how to have easy access to plagiarism detection of articles under review automatically through an online tool for the article under review.”—Prof. Dr. Papageorgas Panagiotis |
| “When reviewing manuscripts, I always willing to provide recommendations to editors and authors based on my knowledge and insights, thereby improving the quality of the papers and contributing to the journal's development. I take the review of every submission responsibly because each paper not only tells a scientific story that have been done, but also may influence the future that yet to come.”—Dr. Zheng Cao |
| “Reviewing varied studies has enhanced my critical thinking, time management, and clear communication, enabling me to provide constructive, detailed feedback while respecting diverse research contexts. It also inspired my own study designs and deepened my understanding of the literature. I recommend peer reviewing to fellow researchers because it sharpens analytical and communication skills, expands expertise, and fosters scientific rigor and collaboration.”—Dr. Laura Zlibinaite |
| “Reviewing for Applied Sciences has been a rewarding way to stay engaged with cutting-edge research, support scientific quality, and give back to the academic community.”—Dr. Ramanjaneyulu Rayala |
| “Reviewing for Applied Sciences has deepened my perspective on applied innovation, particularly in how AI and technology can enhance learning and research methodologies.”—Dr. Juan Luis Cabanillas García |
| “I am committed to providing thorough and constructive reviews to promote rigorous, innovative, and sustainable research in engineering and energy systems.”—Prof. Dr. Carlos Roldán-Blay |
| “Processing peer-reviewed articles gives me significant scope to expand my scientific knowledge on a global level. It is an honor for me to process manuscript reviews, in the areas of engineering structures.”—Prof. Dr. Martin Decký |
| “I believe that providing thorough, constructive feedback helps authors refine their work, ensuring research quality and advancing scientific knowledge. Engaging in the peer review process allows me to stay updated with the latest developments in fields like energy harvesting, plasmonics, and AI, while also supporting the scientific community.”—Dr. Rocco Citroni |
| “Peer review is a rewarding way to contribute to the scientific community and help maintain the quality and integrity of published research.”—Dr. Zhen Liu |
| “Each review is a new challenge for me, as well as an opportunity to learn about the latest research directions in my area of interest. Through a review, we can learn about new approaches and expand our knowledge, which we can later apply in our own research.”—Dr. Łukasz Knypiński |
| “The MDPI review process is transparent and efficient, with an intuitive interface that covers all aspects of peer review according to best practices. The whole system supports comfortable work for reviewers.”—Prof. Dr. Robert Ulewicz |
| “As an editor for several journals and a reviewer for many, I strive to provide constructive feedback that helps authors improve the quality of their work, thus contributing to ensuring rigorous and high-quality scientific publications.”—Dr. Assunta Pozzuoli |
You can read more testimonials at the following link: https://www.mdpi.com/testimonials?type=all&journal_id=90&page_count=50.