Next Article in Journal
Psychological Factors in Obesity
Previous Article in Journal
Vitamin K Prophylaxis for the Hemorrhagic Disease of the Newborns—A Short Narrative Review
 
 
Romanian Journal of Preventive Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with the previous journal publisher.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening—What Is Next?

by
Antonia Elena Ranetti
1 and
Horia Tudor Stanca
1,2
1
Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Strada Dionisie Lupu No. 37, 020021 București, Romania
2
Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
Rom. J. Prev. Med. 2023, 2(1), 47-55; https://doi.org/10.3390/rjpm2010047
Published: 1 March 2023

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide in patients older than 60 years. Because of the aging population, it is of great importance to diagnose the disease early to help the patients get access to treatment. In its incipient stages, patients are usually asymptomatic, but the advanced disease can progress very fast, and it severely affects visual acuity. Over time there have been proposals for screening programs for patients with AMD, but at the moment there are no programs in most countries. The disease burden is significant because there is no cure for late AMD, especially for dry AMD. The management for most of the early and intermediate patients affected consists of antioxidant supplements and risk factors reduction. Anti-VEGF injections are the mainstay treatment for patients with neovascular AMD, which can improve and stabilize vision but can’t cure the disease. In the last decade there have been some technological advancements in what concerns the diagnosis and also the management of the disease, so for patients with AMD there is now more hope than ever in every stage of the disease.

Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a frequent, multifactorial, degenerative retinal disease that affects the elderly [1]. AMD impacts the macular region of the retina and results in a gradual loss of visual acuity [1] and it is the leading cause of blindness in developed nations, accounting for 8.7% of all cases of blindness worldwide [2]. According to projections, 288 million people will have age-related macular degeneration in 2040 [2].
AMD can be classified into early or late AMD, which is further classified into two types: dry or wet AMD, based on the choroidal neovascularization presence or its absence [1].
The AMD diagnosis was made in the past based on clinical inspection or evaluation of colored fundus images [3]. Because technology improved a lot, now there are a lot of imaging techniques available, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the most useful tool for AMD because it confirms the diagnosis, providing a lot of data concerning the drusen size, other lesion position, amount, and extension and disease activity [1].
The disease burden on patients with AMD is a cause for great concern both from a social and economic point of view. In a recent study, conducted in Spain by Ruiz-Moreno et al., the economic burden of AMD patients, reflected on the direct costs of treatment with mostly vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF) and the disease diagnostic and monitoring and concluded that the disease has significant costs for the healthcare system and for the patients [4].

Risk factors

The risk of developing age-related macular degeneration is determined by environmental factors, and genetic and non-genetic factors [5,6]. It is found by multiple studies that increasing age has the most solid association with the disease, and almost all the patients with advanced AMD are older than 60 years [7,8]. In what concerns gender, AMD has a higher incidence in the female gender [1], though in the past there was not sufficient evidence for the association of the female sex with late AMD [7,9]. There is a racial variation suggested in the studies which showed a higher prevalence of early, intermediate and of geographic atrophy (GA) in white people with European ancestry, but no specific association with neovascular AMD, which was similar in prevalence for all ethnicities [2]. Genetics has a role in AMD pathogenesis. Some of the genes associated with AMD are specific coding variants of the complement pathway such as complement factors H and I, and also there is a causal role for the TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3 [10]. Known environmental risk factors for developing AMD are cigarette smoking and sunlight exposure [5]. Another association with AMD incidence is represented by cholesterol levels, obesity, and general diet [11]. Increased antioxidant intake can reduce the risk of developing late-stage disease [12,13].

Pathogenesis

Drusen are cellular debris deposits that consist in lipids, proteins and carbohydrates located between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch’s membrane. These are one of the first AMD characteristic lesions which can be seen clinically with ophthalmoscopy and appear as small white or yellow deposits at the macular level. Depending on their size, drusen can be classified as small, medium, or large [1].
Basal laminar deposits are located between the basement membrane of the RPE and its plasma membrane. Their consistency is mainly based on collagen and proteins. These result in a thickened inner collagenous layer of the Bruch membrane [1]. These correlate with retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities [14].
Basal linear deposits are located between the basement membrane of the RPE and the inner collagenous part of Bruch membrane. They consist in membranous materials and create localized aggregations and soft drusen [14].
The Bruch’s membrane thickens and loses some of its permeability as a result of drusen deposition in tandem with other structural and biochemical changes related to AMD pathogenesis, such as chronic activation of the complement cascade and inflammation. RPE pigmentary anomalies, such as hypo- or hyperpigmentation, are caused by neurodegenerative changes within the photoreceptor-RPE complex [15].
Subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD) or reticular pseudo drusen resemble to soft drusen structurally but are located above the RPE. These lesions are associated with a reduction in the choroid capillaries’ vascular flow area and vessel volume and also with a reduced choroidal thickness [16].
Geographic atrophy (GA) is one of the late AMD subtypes. The patient presents with a loss of RPE cells, photoreceptors, and choriocapillaris in the concerned area [17]. The atrophic lesions are classified according to a new consensus based on the OCT findings as incomplete or complete outer retinal atrophy (iORA or cORA) and incomplete or complete retinal pigment epithelium + outer retinal atrophy (iRORA or cRORA) [18].
The lesions encountered in neovascular AMD may start at the choroidal level or in the outer retina. In neovascular AMD, RPE cells secrete VEGF [19] which promotes endothelial cell proliferation and migration which further generates angiogenesis [20]. Macular neovascularization (MNV) can be: type 1 MNV– the new vessels originate from the choroid capillaries and extend into the sub-RPE space, type 2 MNV – the membrane extends from the choroid through Bruch’s membrane and RPE into the subretinal space, and type 3 MNV starts from the retinal circulation and after it extends into the outer retina and choroid [21]. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is located in the sub-RPE space, resembling to type 1 MNV and it is a vascular network of branching vessels with aneurysmal dilations, called polyps which are likely to bleed [21].
Recently with ultra-widefield imaging technology it has been found that peripheral lesions are also frequently noticed in the eyes of patients with AMD, and it is claimed that the disease does not only affect the central retina, but also the peripheral part [22].

Diagnosis and classification

The usual clinical evaluation includes the following: visual acuity testing, fundus examination for detecting characteristic lesions (drusen, macular neovascularization, hemorrhages, etc.). In addition, retinal imaging such as OCT is mandatory, and some clinicians also perform fluorescein angiography. Fundus color photography is an old and good method of evaluation and also of progression monitoring [3]. Fundus autofluorescence images are very good for geographic atrophy diagnosis, measurement, and progression monitoring and this imaging method is widely used by clinicians and also in studies [23].
The signs of the disease are reduced visual acuity and metamorphopsia when tested with the Amsler grid. Symptoms vary with the stage of the disease. Early AMD patients can be asymptomatic or present only mildly reduced reading ability or mild central image distortion. Late AMD patients can present with severe image distortion, central vision loss, scotoma, reduced contrast sensitivity, difficulty performing daily tasks such as reading or driving, and even visual hallucinations [24].
Amsler grid is a square-shaped grid that can be used for self-monitoring in order to detect and monitor some of the frequent symptoms of the disease, metamorphopsia or scotoma [25]. Patients can be trained to use the test at home and when changes appear they should be acknowledged to undergo a retinal examination in an ophthalmology service, and by doing so, early diagnosis is promoted [25].
To diagnose AMD, the clinician must differentiate normal macular aging changes from degenerative abnormalities. In agreement with the Beckman classification [26] small drusen (<63 microns) represent normal aging modifications, medium drusen (>63 microns and <125 microns) is encountered in early AMD, large drusen (>125 microns) or retinal pigmentary epithelium abnormalities are found in intermediate AMD. Late AMD is the main cause of vision loss and it has two forms: dry AMD or geographic atrophy (GA) and wet AMD or neovascular form [26].

Multimodality

Color fundus photography (CFP) closely resembles biomicroscopic inspection and illustrates a wide variety of fundus abnormalities, including pigmentary abnormalities and various subtypes of macular drusen. The following criteria were used to categorize AMD: drusen size, consistency, location, quantity, and area of involvement. These plans also included measurements of GA size, position, and area as well as the location and quantitative area of hyper- or hypopigmentation [26,27]. With the development of more sophisticated retinal imaging techniques, CFP has lost favor as the main technique for the detection and monitoring of AMD.
Methods like multicolor confocal laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO) (Figure 2-A), near-infrared reflectance (NIR) (Figure 2-D), fluorescein angiography (FA), and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), retro mode imaging (RMI) (Figure 2-C) provide supplementary and confirmatory information, while OCT and fundus autofluorescence (Figure 2-B) have surfaced as important adjuncts for the tracking of AMD.
The retina, retinal pigmentary epithelium, and choroid can be examined in high-quality cross-sectional and en-face images using SD-OCT (Figure 1), which displays a segmentation in profoundness and has a precision that is comparable to that of light microscope histology [28].
OCTA uses motion contrast to identify blood flow and gathers volumetric information in three dimensions of the retina and choroid. The result is a high-resolution image with adequate depth segmentation of the vascular layers of the retina and choroid. All phases of AMD appear to be accompanied by changes in the choriocapillaris. While identifying retinal and choroidal neovascularization has been the main application of OCTA in AMD, dry AMD has also been studied using this technology [29,30].
FA is an old invasive method that has been the gold standard for neovascular AMD assessment, which implies dye injection, a long time dedicated to image acquisition and a reduced picture resolution. In a recent study conducted by Guliano et al concluded that CFP combined with SD-OCT has about the same diagnostic accuracy as CFP combined with FA [31].
FAF offers high-contrast retinal pictures that are particularly helpful for identifying atrophy-prone regions. Due to the loss of RPE cells, which contain intrinsic fluorophores like lipofuscin, atrophic lesions manifest as areas of reduced autofluorescence. Loss of retinal sensitivity is linked to the lack of signal. FAF is currently the anatomic parameter measured for tracking GA progression in most of the studies [29,32]. The most widely used FAF imaging technique at the moment uses a confocal SLO with a blue light excitation frequency filter of 488 nm and an emission filter of 500 to 521 nm [33].
Higher-end visible spectrum light frequencies, which are barely absorbed by media opacities, neurosensory retinal layers, and macular luteal pigments, are used in NIR imaging. Atrophic areas look brighter than regions without atrophy in contrast to blue-light FAF imaging [29]. With this imaging modality, reticular pseudo-drusen can be seen particularly clearly [34]. Another advantage is that patient discomfort is reduced compared to other imaging techniques.
Retro mode is an imaging technique that uses a scanning laser ophthalmoscope with a deviated aperture. It uses infrared laser radiation, that penetrates the deeper retinal layers and the choroid [35,36]. The result is a pseudo-three-dimensional image that highlights different retinal lesions such as drusen, [35,36] subretinal drusenoid deposits [37,38] or pigment epithelial detachments [39].

Machine learning and artificial intelligence in AMD

In what concerns recent technology advancements in ophthalmology, deep learning techniques, machine learning and computer-aided diagnostic systems can be used in order to diagnose and even stage the AMD, in concordance with current classifications used in practice based on the OCT findings and biomarkers detection [40,41]. Disease staging is important since every stage of AMD necessitates a different therapeutic approach, with the aim of preventing visual impairment. The machine learning systems can even predict progression of the disease or visual acuity loss [42]. These diagnostic and monitoring methods will need to be validated in time, but the benefits of standardized procedures using telemedicine in AMD patients would be very helpful for a lot of patients [40].

Screening for AMD

For a long time, it has been questioned if a screening programme for AMD would be cost effective, and it has been tried several times in different countries. In one screening programme, [43] the objectives and perspectives must were defined from the beginning, such as the natural disease progression, health-related quality of life relating to the disease, clinical presentation rates, the effectiveness of the screening test, treatment effectiveness and also the costs of blindness [43].
Figure 1. SD-OCT section though the fovea showing drusen which apear as small elevations of the retinal pigment epitelium.
Figure 1. SD-OCT section though the fovea showing drusen which apear as small elevations of the retinal pigment epitelium.
Rjpm 02 00006 g001
Figure 2. Early AMD with multimodal imaging showing drusen on A. Color scanning laser ophthalmoscopy B. Barely visible on blue-FAF C. Small elevations on retromode imaging and on D. Near Infrared imaging showing spotted areas.
Figure 2. Early AMD with multimodal imaging showing drusen on A. Color scanning laser ophthalmoscopy B. Barely visible on blue-FAF C. Small elevations on retromode imaging and on D. Near Infrared imaging showing spotted areas.
Rjpm 02 00006 g002
A recent investigation conducted in Japan [44] that aimed to generate a screening program model for AMD by using a Markov model of the best-case-scenario analysis. By screening patients starting at the age of 40 years and ending at age of 74 years there would be a 40% decline in the number of patients who lose their sight to AMD [44]. The study concluded that a screening for AMD reduces blindness but is not cost-effective [44].
Another option would be implementing AMD screening as part of the diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening and be performed at the same time. Chan et al. concluded that including intermediate AMD screening into the routine DR screening for patients with diabetes would be cost-effective, and this would mean using the images for the DR screening and grading them also for AMD, and also further treating the diagnosed patients with oral supplements [45].
Telehealth strategies in ophthalmology were tested for AMD screening, and probably in the future, there will be some solutions regarding including a tool kit with a fundus camera and an OCT connected to a network, which would help a lot of patients in receiving the treatment they need [46].
Garcia-Layana et al. proposed a screening tool for AMD self-evaluation with a questionnaire that can be useful to evaluate the risk of advanced disease and does not necessitate an eye examination [47].

Prevention and treatment

The AREDS study [12] proved that a formulation of oral supplements containing antioxidants (vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, and copper) and zinc reduced the AMD progression risk to the advanced disease by around 25%. In the AREDS 2 study, beta-carotene was replaced with lutein and zeaxanthin, which were considered superior for a couple of reasons, one of which is reducing the risk of lung cancer in past smokers [13].
Anti-VEGF agents like bevacizumab, ranibizumab, [48] aflibercept [49] or brolucizumab [50] have proved to be effective for intra- and subretinal fluid resolution and visual acuity improvement in patients with neovascular AMD and are now standard in most of the countries [51].
At the moment there are a series of on-going clinical trials for wet AMD as well as for dry AMD. Anti-VEGF gene therapy for neovascular AMD [52] as well as multiple trials for non-neovascular AMD, including complement factor inhibitors such as Pegcetacoplan, Avacincaptad, Eculizumab and cardiolipin stabilizer Elamiprimide, which is meant to reduce the reactive oxygen species production in the mitochondria [53]. Other therapeutic options that look promising include cellular regeneration therapy, RPE transplantation, and photoreceptor transplantation [54].

Conclusion

Now more than ever patients with AMD have some kind of therapeutic option for every stage of the disease, and a lot of new treatments are to be soon available that hopefully will cure the disease, not only slow the progression. Probably when ocular telehealth strategies will be implemented more and better in developed and developing countries, especially addressing lower-income areas, screening for AMD will become widely available and will help many patients, preventing blindness and saving years of sight.

References

  1. Mitchell, P.; Liew, G.; Gopinath, B.; Wong, T.Y. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet 2018, 392, 1147–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wong, W.L.; Su, X.; Li, X.; Cheung, C.M.; Klein, R.; Cheng, C.Y.; Wong, T.Y. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014, 2, e106–e116, Epub 2014 Jan 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jain, S.; Hamada, S.; Membrey, W.L.; Chong, V. Screening for age-related macular degeneration using nonstereo digital fundus photographs. Eye (Lond) 2006, 20, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ruiz-Moreno, J.M.; Arias, L.; Abraldes, M.J.; Montero, J.; Udaondo, P.; RAMDEBURS study group. Economic burden of age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical practice: the RAMDEBURS study. Int Ophthalmol. 2021, 41, 3427–3436, Epub 2021 Jun 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  5. Lambert, N.G.; ElShelmani, H.; Singh, M.K.; Mansergh, F.C.; Wride, M.A.; Padilla, M.; Keegan, D.; Hogg, R.E.; Ambati, B.K. Risk factors and biomarkers of age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016, 54, 64–102, Epub 2016 May 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  6. Saunier, V.; Merle, B.M.J.; Delyfer, M.N.; Cougnard-Grégoire, A.; Rougier, M.B.; Amouyel, P.; Lambert, J.C.; Dartigues, J.F.; Korobelnik, J.F.; Delcourt, C. Incidence of and Risk Factors Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Four-Year Follow-up From the ALIENOR Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018, 136, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Chakravarthy, U.; Wong, T.Y.; Fletcher, A.; Piault, E.; Evans, C.; Zlateva, G.; Buggage, R.; Pleil, A.; Mitchell, P. Clinical risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2010, 10, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Kawasaki, R.; Wang, J.J.; Aung, T.; Tan, D.T.; Mitchell, P.; Sandar, M.; Saw, S.M.; Wong, T.Y.; Singapore Malay Eye Study Group. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in a Malay population: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2008, 115, 1735–1741, Epub 2008 Apr 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rudnicka, A.R.; Jarrar, Z.; Wormald, R.; Cook, D.G.; Fletcher, A.; Owen, C.G. Age and gender variations in age-related macular degeneration prevalence in populations of European ancestry: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 571–580, Epub 2011 Dec 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fritsche, L.G.; Igl, W.; Bailey, J.N.; Grassmann, F.; Sengupta, S.; Bragg-Gresham, J.L.; Burdon, K.P.; Hebbring, S.J.; Wen, C.; Gorski, M.; Kim, I.K.; Cho, D.; Zack, D.; Souied, E.; Scholl, H.P.; Bala, E.; Lee, K.E.; Hunter, D.J.; Sardell, R.J.; Mitchell, P.; Merriam, J.E.; Cipriani, V.; Hoffman, J.D.; Schick, T.; Lechanteur, Y.T.; Guymer, R.H.; Johnson, M.P.; Jiang, Y.; Stanton, C.M.; Buitendijk, G.H.; Zhan, X.; Kwong, A.M.; Boleda, A.; Brooks, M.; Gieser, L.; Ratnapriya, R.; Branham, K.E.; Foerster, J.R.; Heckenlively, J.R.; Othman, M.I.; Vote, B.J.; Liang, H.H.; Souzeau, E.; McAllister, I.L.; Isaacs, T.; Hall, J.; Lake, S.; Mackey, D.A.; Constable, I.J.; Craig, J.E.; Kitchner, T.E.; Yang, Z.; Su, Z.; Luo, H.; Chen, D.; Ouyang, H.; Flagg, K.; Lin, D.; Mao, G.; Ferreyra, H.; Stark, K.; von Strachwitz, C.N.; Wolf, A.; Brandl, C.; Rudolph, G.; Olden, M.; Morrison, M.A.; Morgan, D.J.; Schu, M.; Ahn, J.; Silvestri, G.; Tsironi, E.E.; Park, K.H.; Farrer, L.A.; Orlin, A.; Brucker, A.; Li, M.; Curcio, C.A.; Mohand-Saïd, S.; Sahel, J.A.; Audo, I.; Benchaboune, M.; Cree, A.J.; Rennie, C.A.; Goverdhan, S.V.; Grunin, M.; Hagbi-Levi, S.; Campochiaro, P.; Katsanis, N.; Holz, F.G.; Blond, F.; Blanché, H.; Deleuze, J.F.; Igo, R.P., Jr.; Truitt, B.; Peachey, N.S.; Meuer, S.M.; Myers, C.E.; Moore, E.L.; Klein, R.; Hauser, M.A.; Postel, E.A.; Courtenay, M.D.; Schwartz, S.G.; Kovach, J.L.; Scott, W.K.; Liew, G.; Tan, A.G.; Gopinath, B.; Merriam, J.C.; Smith, R.T.; Khan, J.C.; Shahid, H.; Moore, A.T.; McGrath, J.A.; Laux, R.; Brantley, M.A., Jr.; Agarwal, A.; Ersoy, L.; Caramoy, A.; Langmann, T.; Saksens, N.T.; de Jong, E.K.; Hoyng, C.B.; Cain, M.S.; Richardson, A.J.; Martin, T.M.; Blangero, J.; Weeks, D.E.; Dhillon, B.; van Duijn, C.M.; Doheny, K.F.; Romm, J.; Klaver, C.C.; Hayward, C.; Gorin, M.B.; Klein, M.L.; Baird, P.N.; den Hollander, A.I.; Fauser, S.; Yates, J.R.; Allikmets, R.; Wang, J.J.; Schaumberg, D.A.; Klein, B.E.; Hagstrom, S.A.; Chowers, I.; Lotery, A.J.; Léveillard, T.; Zhang, K.; Brilliant, M.H.; Hewitt, A.W.; Swaroop, A.; Chew, E.Y.; Pericak-Vance, M.A.; DeAngelis, M.; Stambolian, D.; Haines, J.L.; Iyengar, S.K.; Weber, B.H.; Abecasis, G.R.; Heid, I.M. A large genome-wide association study of age-related macular degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants. Nat Genet. 2016, 48, 134–143, Epub 2015 Dec 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Schultz, N.M.; Bhardwaj, S.; Barclay, C.; Gaspar, L.; Schwartz, J. Global Burden of Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Targeted Literature Review. Clin Ther. 2021, 43, 1792–1818, Epub 2021 Sep 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119, 1417–1436, Erratum in Arch Ophthalmol. 2008, 126, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) Research Group; Chew, E.Y.; Clemons, T.E.; Sangiovanni, J.P.; Danis, R.P.; Ferris, F.L., 3rd; Elman, M.J.; Antoszyk, A.N.; Ruby, A.J.; Orth, D.; Bressler, S.B.; Fish, G.E.; Hubbard, G.B.; Klein, M.L.; Chandra, S.R.; Blodi, B.A.; Domalpally, A.; Friberg, T.; Wong, W.T.; Rosenfeld, P.J.; Agrón, E.; Toth, C.A.; Bernstein, P.S.; Sperduto, R.D. Secondary analyses of the effects of lutein/zeaxanthin on age-related macular degeneration progression: AREDS2 report No. 3. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014, 132, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  14. Sarks, S.; Cherepanoff, S.; Killingsworth, M.; Sarks, J. Relationship of Basal laminar deposit and membranous debris to the clinical presentation of early age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007, 48, 968–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Flores, R.; Carneiro, Â.; Vieira, M.; Tenreiro, S.; Seabra, M.C. Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Pathophysiology, Management, and Future Perspectives. Ophthalmologica 2021, 244, 495–511, Epub 2021 Jun 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Laíns, I.; Wang, J.; Providência, J.; Mach, S.; Gil, P.; Gil, J.; Marques, M.; Armstrong, G.; Garas, S.; Barreto, P.; Kim, I.K.; Vavvas, D.G.; Miller, J.W.; Husain, D.; Silva, R.; Miller, J.B. Choroidal Changes Associated With Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits in Age-related Macular Degeneration Using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017, 180, 55–63, Epub 2017 Jun 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. McLeod, D.S.; Grebe, R.; Bhutto, I.; Merges, C.; Baba, T.; Lutty, G.A. Relationship between RPE and choriocapillaris in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009, 50, 4982–4991, Epub 2009 Apr 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  18. Sadda, S.R.; Guymer, R.; Holz, F.G.; Schmitz-Valckenberg, S.; Curcio, C.A.; Bird, A.C.; Blodi, B.A.; Bottoni, F.; Chakravarthy, U.; Chew, E.Y.; Csaky, K.; Danis, R.P.; Fleckenstein, M.; Freund, K.B.; Grunwald, J.; Hoyng, C.B.; Jaffe, G.J.; Liakopoulos, S.; Monés, J.M.; Pauleikhoff, D.; Rosenfeld, P.J.; Sarraf, D.; Spaide, R.F.; Tadayoni, R.; Tufail, A.; Wolf, S.; Staurenghi, G. Consensus Definition for Atrophy Associated with Age-Related Macular Degeneration on OCT: Classification of Atrophy Report 3. Ophthalmology 2018, 125, 537–548, Epub 2017 Nov 2. Erratum in Ophthalmology 2019, 126, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Penn, J.S.; Madan, A.; Caldwell, R.B.; Bartoli, M.; Caldwell, R.W.; Hartnett, M.E. Vascular endothelial growth factor in eye disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008, 27, 331–371, Epub 2008 May 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Kliffen, M.; Sharma, H.S.; Mooy, C.M.; Kerkvliet, S.; de Jong, P.T. Increased expression of angiogenic growth factors in age-related maculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997, 81, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Spaide, R.F.; Jaffe, G.J.; Sarraf, D.; Freund, K.B.; Sadda, S.R.; Staurenghi, G.; Waheed, N.K.; Chakravarthy, U.; Rosenfeld, P.J.; Holz, F.G.; Souied, E.H.; Cohen, S.Y.; Querques, G.; Ohno-Matsui, K.; Boyer, D.; Gaudric, A.; Blodi, B.; Baumal, C.R.; Li, X.; Coscas, G.J.; Brucker, A.; Singerman, L.; Luthert, P.; Schmitz-Valckenberg, S.; Schmidt-Erfurth, U.; Grossniklaus, H.E.; Wilson, D.J.; Guymer, R.; Yannuzzi, L.A.; Chew, E.Y.; Csaky, K.; Monés, J.M.; Pauleikhoff, D.; Tadayoni, R.; Fujimoto, J. Consensus Nomenclature for Reporting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Data: Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature Study Group. Ophthalmology 2020, 127, 616–636, Epub 2019 Nov 14. Erratum in Ophthalmology 2020, 127, 1434–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Forshaw, T.R.J.; Minör, Å.S.; Subhi, Y.; Sørensen, T.L. Peripheral Retinal Lesions in Eyes with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Ultra-Widefield Imaging: A Systematic Review with Meta-analyses. Ophthalmol Retina 2019, 3, 734–743, Epub 2019 Apr 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Domalpally, A.; Danis, R.; Agrón, E.; Blodi, B.; Clemons, T.; Chew, E.; Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Research Group. Evaluation of Geographic Atrophy from Color Photographs and Fundus Autofluorescence Images: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Report Number 11. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 2401–2407, Epub 2016 Jul 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Age-related macular degeneration: diagnosis and management. NICE Guideline, no. 82, Jan. 2018. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536479/ (accessed on 5 March 2023).
  25. Bjerager, J.; Schneider, M.; Potapenko, I.; van Dijk, E.H.C.; Faber, C.; Grauslund, J.; Pfau, K.; Huemer, J.; Muttuvelu, D.V.; Rasmussen, M.L.R.; Sabaner, M.C.; Subhi, Y. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Amsler Grid Test for Detecting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023; Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ferris, F.L., 3rd; Wilkinson, C.P.; Bird, A.; Chakravarthy, U.; Chew, E.; Csaky, K.; Sadda, S.R.; Beckman Initiative for Macular Research Classification Committee. Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 844–851, Epub 2013 Jan 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Davis, M.D.; Gangnon, R.E.; Lee, L.Y.; Hubbard, L.D.; Klein, B.E.; Klein, R.; Ferris, F.L.; Bressler, S.B.; Milton, R.C.; Age-Related Eye Disease Study Group. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 17. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005, 123, 1484–1498, Erratum in Arch Ophthalmol. 2006, 124, 289–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Lei, J.; Balasubramanian, S.; Abdelfattah, N.S.; Nittala, M.G.; Sadda, S.R. Proposal of a simple optical coherence tomography-based scoring system for progression of age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017, 255, 1551–1558, Epub 2017 May 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Holz, F.G.; Sadda, S.R.; Staurenghi, G.; Lindner, M.; Bird, A.C.; Blodi, B.A.; Bottoni, F.; Chakravarthy, U.; Chew, E.Y.; Csaky, K.; Curcio, C.A.; Danis, R.; Fleckenstein, M.; Freund, K.B.; Grunwald, J.; Guymer, R.; Hoyng, C.B.; Jaffe, G.J.; Liakopoulos, S.; Monés, J.M.; Oishi, A.; Pauleikhoff, D.; Rosenfeld, P.J.; Sarraf, D.; Spaide, R.F.; Tadayoni, R.; Tufail, A.; Wolf, S.; Schmitz-Valckenberg, S.; CAM group. Imaging Protocols in Clinical Studies in Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Recommendations from Classification of Atrophy Consensus Meetings. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, 464–478, Epub 2017 Jan 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cicinelli, M.V.; Rabiolo, A.; Sacconi, R.; Carnevali, A.; Querques, L.; Bandello, F.; Querques, G. Optical coherence tomography angiography in dry age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018, 63, 236–244, Epub 2017 Jun 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gualino, V.; et al. OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY, FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY, AND DIAGNOSIS OF CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina 2019, 39, 1664–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pilotto, E.; Guidolin, F.; Convento, E.; Spedicato, L.; Vujosevic, S.; Cavarzeran, F.; Midena, E. Fundus autofluorescence and microperimetry in progressing geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2013, 97, 622–626, Epub 2013 Feb 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yung, M.; Klufas, M.A.; Sarraf, D. Clinical applications of fundus autofluorescence in retinal disease. Int J Retina Vitreous 2016, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  34. Ueda-Arakawa, N.; Ooto, S.; Tsujikawa, A.; Yamashiro, K.; Oishi, A.; Yoshimura, N. SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF DETECTING RETICULAR PSEUDODRUSEN IN MULTIMODAL IMAGING IN JAPANESE PATIENTS. Retina 2013, 33, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Diniz, B.; Ribeiro, R.M.; Rodger, D.C.; Maia, M.; Sadda, S. Drusen detection by confocal aperture-modulated infrared scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013, 97, 285–290, Epub 2012 Dec 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Acton, J.H.; Cubbidge, R.P.; King, H.; Galsworthy, P.; Gibson, J.M. Drusen detection in retro-mode imaging by a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011, 89, e404–e411, Epub 2011 Feb 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Corradetti, G.; Corvi, F.; Sadda, S.R. Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits Revealed by Color SLO and Retro-Mode Imaging. Ophthalmology 2021, 128, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cozzi, M.; Monteduro, D.; Parrulli, S.; Corvi, F.; Zicarelli, F.; Corradetti, G.; Sadda, S.R.; Staurenghi, G. Sensitivity and Specificity of Multimodal Imaging in Characterizing Drusen. Ophthalmol Retina 2020, 4, 987–995, Epub 2020 Apr 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shin, Y.U.; Lee, B.R. Retro-mode Imaging for retinal pigment epithelium alterations in central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012, 154, 155–163.e4, Epub 2012 Apr 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Elsharkawy, M.; Elrazzaz, M.; Ghazal, M.; Alhalabi, M.; Soliman, A.; Mahmoud, A.; El-Daydamony, E.; Atwan, A.; Thanos, A.; Sandhu, H.S.; Giridharan, G.; El-Baz, A. Role of Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging in Predicting Progression of Age-Related Macular Disease: A Survey. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021, 11, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  41. Loo, J.; et al. Joint multimodal deep learning-based automatic segmentation of ICGA and OCT images for assessment of PCV biomarkers. Ophthalmology Science 2023, 100292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lad, E.; Sleiman, K.; Banks, D.L.; Hariharan, S.; Clemons, T.; Herrmann, R.; Dauletbekov, D.; Giani, A.; Chong, V.; Chew, E.Y.; Toth, C.A. Machine learning OCT predictors of progression from intermediate age-related macular degeneration to geographic atrophy and vision loss. Ophthalmol Sci. 2022, 2, 100160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  43. Karnon, J.; Czoski-Murray, C.; Smith, K.; Brand, C.; Chakravarthy, U.; Davis, S.; Bansback, N.; Beverley, C.; Bird, A.; Harding, S.; Chisholm, I.; Yang, Y.C. A preliminary model-based assessment of the cost-utility of a screening programme for early age-related macular degeneration. Health Technol Assess. 2008, 12, iii–iv, ix–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tamura, H.; Akune, Y.; Hiratsuka, Y.; Kawasaki, R.; Kido, A.; Miyake, M.; Goto, R.; Yamada, M. Real-world effectiveness of screening programs for age-related macular degeneration: amended Japanese specific health checkups and augmented screening programs with OCT or AI. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2022, 66, 19–32, Epub 2022 Jan 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chan, C.K.; Gangwani, R.A.; McGhee, S.M.; Lian, J.; Wong, D.S. Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration during Diabetic Retinopathy Screening. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 2278–2285, Epub 2015 Aug 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Brady, C.J.; Garg, S. Telemedicine for Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Telemed J E Health 2020, 26, 565–568, Epub 2020 Mar 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  47. García-Layana, A.; et al. A Screening Tool for Self-Evaluation of Risk for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Validation in a Spanish Population. Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2022, 11, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) Research Group; Martin, D.F.; Maguire, M.G.; Fine, S.L.; Ying, G.S.; Jaffe, G.J.; Grunwald, J.E.; Toth, C.; Redford, M.; Ferris, F.L., 3rd. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 1388–1398, Epub 2012 May 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  49. Heier, J.S.; Brown, D.M.; Chong, V.; Korobelnik, J.F.; Kaiser, P.K.; Nguyen, Q.D.; Kirchhof, B.; Ho, A.; Ogura, Y.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Stahl, N.; Vitti, R.; Berliner, A.J.; Soo, Y.; Anderesi, M.; Groetzbach, G.; Sommerauer, B.; Sandbrink, R.; Simader, C.; Schmidt-Erfurth, U.; VIEW 1 and VIEW 2 Study Groups. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 2537–2548, Epub 2012 Oct 17. Erratum in Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 209–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Singh, R.P.; Jhaveri, C.; Wykoff, C.C.; Gale, R.P.; Staurenghi, G.; Iida, T.; Koh, A.; B, G.; Gedif, K.; Singer, M. Efficacy Outcomes of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients with Early Residual Fluid. Ophthalmol Retina 2022, 6, 377–386, Epub 2021 Dec 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Flaxel, C.J.; Adelman, R.A.; Bailey, S.T.; Fawzi, A.; Lim, J.I.; Vemulakonda, G.A.; Ying, G.S. Age-Related Macular Degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology 2020, 127, P1–P65, Epub 2019 Sep 25. Erratum in Ophthalmology 2020, 127, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Berkowitz, S.T.; Patel, S. Value of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmol Retina 2021, 5, 357–364, Epub 2020 Aug 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Abidi, M.; Karrer, E.; Csaky, K.; Handa, J.T. A Clinical and Preclinical Assessment of Clinical Trials for Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmol Sci. 2022, 2, 100213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  54. Chichagova, V.; Hallam, D.; Collin, J.; Zerti, D.; Dorgau, B.; Felemban, M.; Lako, M.; Steel, D.H. Cellular regeneration strategies for macular degeneration: past, present and future. Eye (Lond) 2018, 32, 946–971, Epub 2018 Mar 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ranetti, A.E.; Stanca, H.T. Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening—What Is Next? Rom. J. Prev. Med. 2023, 2, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/rjpm2010047

AMA Style

Ranetti AE, Stanca HT. Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening—What Is Next? Romanian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2023; 2(1):47-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/rjpm2010047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ranetti, Antonia Elena, and Horia Tudor Stanca. 2023. "Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening—What Is Next?" Romanian Journal of Preventive Medicine 2, no. 1: 47-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/rjpm2010047

APA Style

Ranetti, A. E., & Stanca, H. T. (2023). Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening—What Is Next? Romanian Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/rjpm2010047

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop