Next Article in Journal
Genetic Variability Assessment of Azadirachta indica A. Juss in Eastern India: Implications for Tree Improvement
Previous Article in Journal
Preliminary Studies on the Selection of Uruguayan Woods for the Production of Transparent Wood
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Influence of the Biostimulant Larrea Divaricata on the Quality of Neltuma Alba Plants in the Nursery †

by
Gabriela Soledad Cordero Vega
1,*,
María Gracia Senilliani
2,
Analía del Valle Guzman
2,
Ana Carolina Santacruz García
3 and
Gastón F. Villalba
4
1
Facultad de Ciencias Forestales (FCF), Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero G4200, Argentina
2
Instituto de Silvicultura y Manejo de Bosques (INSIMA), Facultad de Ciencias Forestales (FCF), Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero G4200, Argentina
3
Parque Científico de Innovación Social, Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios—UNIMINUTO, Bogota G111021, Colombia
4
Laboratorio de Antioxidantes y Procesos Oxidativos (Lapox), Instituto de Ciencias Químicas (ICQ), Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias (FAyA), Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, RN 9 km 1125, Villa El Zanjón, Santiago del Estero G4026, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Forests, 23–25 September 2024.
Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2024, 31(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2024031012
Published: 27 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Forests)

Abstract

:
In our region, promoting Neltuma alba (algarrobo blanco) plantations is crucial due to its ecological and productive value, requiring ongoing research for successful cultivation. Ensuring seedlings possess optimal physiological and morphological traits is essential for survival and adaptation after transplanting. Previous studies suggest plant biostimulants can aid in reducing stress during rustication and field planting stages. This work aimed to explore the potential of Larrea divaricata (Jarilla) phytoextract in varying doses as a biostimulant to enhance seedling quality and stress response in N. alba, ultimately improving their adaptability and growth in field conditions.

1. Introduction

The algarrobo blanco (Neltuma alba) grows naturally in the north of Argentina in the semi-arid Chaco, a region to which almost the entire province of Santiago del Estero belongs. The wood of this species, of excellent quality, is highly appreciated for furniture, carpentry, parquet and coatings. Its increasing use for firewood, fodder and food means that this forest resource is exploited irrationally [1].
The nursery stage is a fundamental prerequisite to success in the afforestation project; the seedling in the nursery must be managed in such a way as to obtain individuals suitable for favorable development in the field.
Biostimulants are natural extracts with multiple benefits such as promoting growth and development, increasing resistance to stress and optimizing the use of nutrients [2,3].
The extracts of Larrea divaricata “Jarilla” can be used as biostimulants, because they improve the performance of those individuals that are found in semi-arid and arid areas such as Santiago del Estero. Because Jarilla is a plant adapted to this type of environment, it can be easily found, and therefore we have material to obtain the extracts.
The effectiveness of the biostimulant is based on its concentration and method of application. For this, a series of trials were carried out at the Nursery of the Faculty of Forestry Sciences, where the efficiency of different doses was evaluated.

2. Methodology

  • First stage: Production of seedlings
This study was carried out at the Nursery of the Institute of Forestry and Forest Management of the Faculty of Forestry Sciences, El Zanjón headquarters of the University of Santiago del Estero, Argentina.
In the first instance, activities related to the sterilization of the containers (250 cm3 tubes with their respective trays) where the seedlings were going to be developed were carried out. As a second activity, the substrate was prepared (Figure 1a) with composted pine bark and agricultural perlite in a 50:50 (v:v) proportion and slow-release granulated fertilizer. Lastly, a fungicide was incorporated and allowed to rest for one day.
Subsequently, 243 tubes (four-and-a-half trays) were filled to begin the planting stage. The germplasm used came from a mass selection of stands located in the Robles department, province of Santiago del Estero (2021 harvest). Sowing began on 22 February 2024.
Regarding cultural activities, irrigation was automated; in addition, preventive chemical treatments were applied with a backpack sprayer (Figure 1b) (fungicide and insecticide) on a weekly basis.
The monitoring of the germination percentage per tray was carried out for 8 days (Table 1) (Figure 2).
On 10 March 2024 (Table 2), the rapid growth phase began. It was estimated to last approximately 45 days. The vast majority of individuals had to reach the established DAC and stem height to be able to subsequently move on to the rustification stage.
During this phase, irrigation was reinforced. The plants were watered for 15 min at 7 am and 1 pm. The variations that occurred in the course of the process with respect to automatic irrigation were caused by the meteorological conditions present during the development of the test. In the case of persistent rain, irrigation was canceled because it was not necessary. The optimal fertilizer for this stage was applied once a week.
On 8 May 2024, it was determined that the rustification stage began due to the data collected from the DAC and stem height. As a first measure, the plants were relocated outside the greenhouse, in a space where there was direct light. In addition, the number of waterings per day was reduced to only one 15 min watering at 1 pm.
  • Second stage: Preparation of biostimulant with Larrea divaricata “Jarilla”
The collection of the species Larrea divaricata (Figure 3a) was carried out in the rural area of Santiago del Estero Capital, specifically, in the town of Santa María on the side of Route 9.
Branches containing leaves, flowers, etc., were collected. They were dried by natural drying, which consisted of leaving them in full sun for 3 days (summer time).
Once the drying process was completed, they were taken to INTA La María, and the jarilla powder which was going to be used for the extract was obtained using a grinding mill (Figure 3b).
In the FAyA laboratory, the phytoextract began to be prepared, for which the following procedure was carried out:
In the first instance, the mass used for the preparation of a Jarilla concentration of 3% and 4% was calculated, the appropriate concentration and application method are decisive to maximize the benefits of biostimulants [4]. A volume of 15 mL/plant was determined for the application of the biostimulant; we worked with 81 individuals per treatment.
Therefore, for Jarilla 3% (3 g of jarilla powder per 100 mL), a mass of 75 g of powder was worked, while for Jarilla 4% (4 g of jarilla powder per 100 mL), the mass was 100 g to obtain the phytoextract. To calculate the volume of biostimulant used, per seedling, the base volume of the backpack was taken into account. It was decided to round up to a final volume of 2500 mL.
It should be noted that, in the laboratory, the concentrations were prepared at a volume of 250 mL (concentrated volume); at the time of application, the final volume (2500 mL) was reached with the incorporation of distilled water.
Subsequently, in 2 microwave-safe containers, the masses corresponding to each preparation were weighed (precision balance) and distilled water was added until a volume between 200 and 250 mL was reached (it is important to respect the final volume, and in any case, it is recommended in the first instance to work with a lower volume such as 240 mL and at the end of the process to add the necessary amount of distilled water).
Then, the preparation was placed in the microwave, using the “heat” function for 4 min. This process was conducted at intervals to prevent the mixture from starting to boil (Figure 4a). It is recommended to remove the preparation approximately every 30 s and cool it with gentle surrounding movements. Alternatively, a damp cloth can be used to reduce the temperature.
Once the microwave heating process was completed, vacuum extraction was carried out with the help of a vacuum pump (Figure 4b). A paper filter cut to size was placed inside the ceramic funnel, on which the preparation was deposited. The filtered product was transferred to its respective containers, where the initially proposed preparation volume was completed(Figure 4c).
The biostimulant must be applied in two doses (Table 3), with a difference of 7 days between them. It is recommended to store the second dose in the freezer until its next application(Figure 4d).
  • Third stage: Plant quality evaluation
The morphological parameters total dry weight (PST), aerial dry weight (PSA) and root dry weight (PSR) were recorded 207 days after sowing (16 September 2024). The recording of these parameters was made towards the end of the vegetative dormancy period when the plants began to grow again. Plant biomass was determined by the destructive method, using nine seedlings per treatment (Figure 5a,b). The aerial and radical parts were separated for subsequent drying in an oven with forced air circulation at 72 °C for 48 h. The dry weight was recorded on an electronic scale with a resolution of 0.001 g (Figure 5c).
Based on the morphological attributes mentioned above, the following indices were calculated: the aerial biomass and root biomass ratio (PSA/PSR), which represents the weight ratio between the tissue that evapotranspirates and photosynthesizes (aerial part) and the tissue that absorbs water and nutrients and at the same time consumes carbohydrates through respiration (roots); the slenderness index (IE) (Thompson, 1985) [5], which is the quotient or ratio between the total height of the plant (cm) and its DAC (mm), and is an indicator of crop density; and the plant quality index (Dickson, 1960) [6] that represents morphological quality; the higher the value of this index, the greater the plant quality.
The treatment with Jarilla 4% shows a tendency to have a greater DAC (mm) (1.96 ± 0.14), which suggests that this concentration could be favoring a greater development of the neck diameter compared to the control (1.71 ± 0.14) and Jarilla 3% (1.61 ± 0.14) (Table 4). Higher DAC is generally an indicator of a more robust plant, which could be beneficial to transplant success.
Regarding height (cm), the treatment with Jarilla 3% has a slightly higher value (15.71 ± 0.71) compared to Jarilla 4% (14.74 ± 0.71) and the control (15.22 ± 0.71). Although the difference is not significant, there could be a tendency for 3% jarilla to promote more favorable growth in height than the 4% concentration. Taking this information into account, it must be emphasized that a shorter plant in arid climates could be better adapted to reduce water loss through transpiration and minimize water stress caused by high solar radiation and dry wind.
The PSR (g) values are very similar between the three treatments, with a slight tendency for the Jarilla 3% treatment to have a slightly higher value (0.18 ± 0.1) compared to the control (0.17 ± 0.1) and Jarilla 4% (0.17 ± 0.1).
Finally, the Dickson index, an indicator of the overall quality of the plant, is very similar between the treatments, but with a small tendency towards improvement in the treatment with Jarilla 4% (0.03 ± 8 × 10−3). This suggests that the use of 4% jarilla could be contributing to a slightly better distribution of growth between the aerial part and the roots.

3. Conclusions

Although the differences are not significant, a tendency can be observed that the treatment with Jarilla 4% favors the diameter of the neck and the Dickson index, which are important indicators of robustness and plant quality.
DAC is a crucial parameter in the evaluation of plant quality, since a larger diameter indicates greater vigor and robustness, which are important factors for success in the field, especially in stress situations such as transplanting. Although the difference is not significant, the trend towards a higher DAC could reflect that the 4% jarilla concentration promotes greater structural strengthening in the plant, better preparing it to face adverse conditions.
Regarding the Dickson index (CI), which is considered an integral quality parameter because it weighs the aerial and root biomass in relation to height and diameter, it also shows a slight favorable trend in the treatment with Jarilla 4% (0.03 ± 8 × 10−3). This index is essential to evaluate the balance between the development of the aerial part and the roots, and a higher value suggests that the plant has a more balanced growth, with an optimal distribution of biomass to maximize its survival and future growth capacity.
This trend indicates that the 4% jarilla could be helping to optimize the balance between the growth of the aerial part and the roots, improving the efficiency of resource use and favoring the general quality of the plant.
Although the root dry weight (PSR) does not show significant differences, the Jarilla 4% treatment maintains similar values to the control (0.17 ± 0.1). This suggests that, although the 4% jarilla does not promote more pronounced root development than the control, it does not inhibit it either.
These trends do not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05), but they could be indications that the use of 4% jarilla can improve certain structural aspects of the plants, which should be considered in future studies with a greater number of repetitions, different experimental conditions or even higher doses (higher concentration).

Author Contributions

G.S.C.V. was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, sample collection, analyses and writing. M.G.S., A.d.V.G. and A.C.S.G. assisted with conceptualization, methodology, resources, review and editing. G.F.V. participated in sample dating. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero (UNSE.FCF), and Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Juárez de Galindez, M.; Giménez, A.M.; Rios, N.; Balzarini, M. Modelación de crecimiento en Prosopis alba Griseb. Empleando dos modelos biológicos. Quebracho-Rev. Cienc. For. 2005, 12, 34–42. Available online: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/481/48101203.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  2. Calvo, P.; Nelson, L.; Kloepper, J.W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 2014, 383, 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Santacruz García, A.C.; Senilliani, M.G.; Gómez, A.T.; Ewens, M.; Yonnymi, M.E.; Villalba, G.F.; Nazareno, M.A. Bioestimulantes como agentes de protección forestal: ¿Estos productos tienen efecto contra el estrés abiótico en una especie nativa del bosque? Aspectos para dilucidar sus mecanismos de acción. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112722004406 (accessed on 1 May 2024).
  4. Van Oosten, M.J.; Pepe, O.; De Pascale, S.; Silletti, S.; Maggio, A. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thompson, B.E. Seedling morphological evaluation. What can you tell by looking. In Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Test; Duryea, M.L., Ed.; Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1985; pp. 59–71. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickson, A.; Leaf, A.L.; Hosner, J.F. Quality Appraisal of White Spruce and White Pine Seedling Stock in Nurseries. For. Chron. 1960, 36, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cultural tasks during the nursery production process. (a) Substrate preparation. (b) Application of chemical treatments.
Figure 1. Cultural tasks during the nursery production process. (a) Substrate preparation. (b) Application of chemical treatments.
Eesp 31 00012 g001
Figure 2. Trays with algarrobo blanco individuals. (a) Trays with individuals; date 1 March 2024. (b) Individuals with two true leaves.
Figure 2. Trays with algarrobo blanco individuals. (a) Trays with individuals; date 1 March 2024. (b) Individuals with two true leaves.
Eesp 31 00012 g002
Figure 3. (a) Jarilla plant. (b) Jarilla powder post processing.
Figure 3. (a) Jarilla plant. (b) Jarilla powder post processing.
Eesp 31 00012 g003
Figure 4. (a) Solution of jarilla powder with distilled water after heating in the microwave. (b) Filtering the solution for later storage. (c) Solution processed in the container where the 250 mL of biostimulant is completed. (d) Concentrated biostimulant.
Figure 4. (a) Solution of jarilla powder with distilled water after heating in the microwave. (b) Filtering the solution for later storage. (c) Solution processed in the container where the 250 mL of biostimulant is completed. (d) Concentrated biostimulant.
Eesp 31 00012 g004
Figure 5. (a) White Carob seedlings placed on paper napkins to facilitate the drainage of water after washing; (b) root biomass; (c) weighed radical biomass on an electronic scale with a precision of 0.001 g.
Figure 5. (a) White Carob seedlings placed on paper napkins to facilitate the drainage of water after washing; (b) root biomass; (c) weighed radical biomass on an electronic scale with a precision of 0.001 g.
Eesp 31 00012 g005
Table 1. Germination percentage per tray of N. alba in the nursery, by date.
Table 1. Germination percentage per tray of N. alba in the nursery, by date.
Germination by Tray
Date1%G2%G3%G4%G5%G
26 February2750.002953.703768.523972.221866.67
28 February54100.0054100.0054100.0054100.0027100.00
1 March54100.0054100.0054100.0054100.0027100.00
To calculate the emergency percentage, the following formula was used: %E = (N° of seedlings emerged in the last count)/(N° of seeds sown) × 100.
Table 2. Percentage of second leaf per tray of Neltuma alba, by date.
Table 2. Percentage of second leaf per tray of Neltuma alba, by date.
2nd Leaf per Tray
Date1%2° Leaf2%2° Leaf3%2° Leaf4%2° Leaf5%2° Leaf
6 March23.7000.0000.0000.0000.00
8 March1425.93611.11611.11611.1127.41
10 MarchBeginning of rapid growth phase—estimated to last approximately 45 days. Fertilizer application and manual watering at midday.
11 March4583.334277.785398.155092.592177.78
13 March5296.304277.785398.155092.592177.78
18 March54100.005296.3054100.0054100.0027100.00
Table 3. Biostimulant application and activities.
Table 3. Biostimulant application and activities.
DateApplication of the BiostimulantActivities
21 MayDAC/H Measurement
28 May-
Table 4. Morphological parameters and indices of Neltuma alba plants: control and treatment with 3% Jarilla concentration and 4% Jarilla concentration.
Table 4. Morphological parameters and indices of Neltuma alba plants: control and treatment with 3% Jarilla concentration and 4% Jarilla concentration.
Morphological Parameters and IndicesControlJarilla 3%Jarilla 4%
DAC (mm)1.71 ± 0.14 A1.61 ± 0.14 A1.96 ± 0.14 A
H (cm)15.22 ± 0.71 A15.71 ± 0.71 A14.74 ± 0.71 A
PSR (g)0.17 ± 0.1 A0.18 ± 0.1 A0.17 ± 0.1 A
IC0.03 ± 8 × 10−3 A0.02 ± 8 × 10−3 A0.03 ± 8 × 10−3 A
The values in the table express the mean ± standard error. Same letters for each row indicate that the means are not significantly different (p > 0.05) in the Tukey test. DAC = diameter at neck height; PSR = root dry weight; H = height; IC = Dickson index.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cordero Vega, G.S.; Senilliani, M.G.; Guzman, A.d.V.; García, A.C.S.; Villalba, G.F. Influence of the Biostimulant Larrea Divaricata on the Quality of Neltuma Alba Plants in the Nursery. Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2024, 31, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2024031012

AMA Style

Cordero Vega GS, Senilliani MG, Guzman AdV, García ACS, Villalba GF. Influence of the Biostimulant Larrea Divaricata on the Quality of Neltuma Alba Plants in the Nursery. Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings. 2024; 31(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2024031012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cordero Vega, Gabriela Soledad, María Gracia Senilliani, Analía del Valle Guzman, Ana Carolina Santacruz García, and Gastón F. Villalba. 2024. "Influence of the Biostimulant Larrea Divaricata on the Quality of Neltuma Alba Plants in the Nursery" Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings 31, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2024031012

APA Style

Cordero Vega, G. S., Senilliani, M. G., Guzman, A. d. V., García, A. C. S., & Villalba, G. F. (2024). Influence of the Biostimulant Larrea Divaricata on the Quality of Neltuma Alba Plants in the Nursery. Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings, 31(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2024031012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop