Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization of Bacillus anthracis from Selected Districts of Bangladesh
Previous Article in Journal
Device-Associated Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units: A Prospective Surveillance Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Blood Parasite Diversity and Zoonotic Risk in Captive Sun-Tailed Monkeys from Gabon

by
Sarah Parfaite Ambourouet
1,*,
Franck Mounioko
1,2,
Patrice Makouloutou-Nzassi
1,
Monique Nzale
3,
Barthelemy Ngoubangoye
4,5 and
Larson Boundenga
1,5,*
1
Unité de Recherche en Écologie de la Santé (URES), Centre Interdisciplinaires de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (CIRMF), Franceville BP 769, Gabon
2
Département de Biologie, Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku (USTM), Franceville BP 067, Gabon
3
Département de Biologie Animale, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar (UCAD), Dakar BP 5005, Senegal
4
Centre de Primatologie (CDP), Centre Interdisciplinaires de Recherches Médicales de Franceville, Franceville BP 769, Gabon
5
Save Gabon’s Primates (SGP), Franceville BP 769, Gabon
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Acta Microbiol. Hell. 2025, 70(2), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/amh70020016
Submission received: 5 February 2025 / Revised: 8 April 2025 / Accepted: 21 April 2025 / Published: 28 April 2025

Abstract

:
The present study investigates the prevalence and diversity of Plasmodium and Trypanosoma infections in Allochrocebus solatus, a vulnerable primate species native to Gabon. Using molecular techniques like nested PCR and phylogenetic analysis, we found 34.0% infection rate for malaria parasites infection, 21.3% for Trypanosoma spp., and 12.8% co-infections. Additionally, Hepatocystis was exclusively detected among malaria parasites, while Trypanosoma brucei brucei, T. vivax, and T. congolense were identified. These results underscore the complex host–parasite interactions influenced by captivity and the ecological and immunological consequences of such infections, particularly the increased susceptibility associated with captivity-induced stress. This preliminary study highlights the need for ongoing surveillance to mitigate health risks in primates and prevent potential zoonotic spillovers, providing critical data for conservation efforts.

1. Introduction

The sun-tailed monkey (Allochrocebus solatus) is an endemic primate species from Gabon belonging to the Cercopithecinae subfamily. First described in 1984 [1,2], its elusive behavior and cryptic appearance hinder observation in the wild, which has limited research on the species [3]. Nonetheless, A. solatus plays a vital ecological role in seed dispersal and forest dynamics [4,5].
A. solatus faces numerous threats, including deforestation and subsistence hunting [6,7], resulting in its classification as vulnerable on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2012) and its inclusion in Appendix II of CITES [5]. In Gabon, A. solatus is fully protected under the Forestry Code and 2011 decree.
Alongside anthropogenic pressures, A. solatus, like other non-human primates, is susceptible to health risks from infectious agents that may significantly impact its population dynamics [8,9,10,11], although data on these pathogens is scarce. Previous studies have explored simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) [12] and intestinal parasite [10], highlighting an urgent need for further research on pathogens affecting this species. Despite the advances in knowledge concerning its ecology and gastrointestinal parasites, systemic infections such as malaria and trypanosomiasis have yet to be extensively studied. The paucity of prior molecular studies on blood parasites in A. solatus signifies a critical gap in the existing body of research, necessitating further investigation to assess potential health risks and zoonotic implications.
It is evident that African non-human primates (NHPs), in both wild and captive settings, have been documented as significant reservoirs for various blood parasites, particularly those belonging to the Plasmodium and Trypanosoma genera [13,14,15,16,17]. Blood parasites identified in NHPs include several malaria species such as Plasmodium praefalciparum, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium gonderi, Plasmodium DAJ-2004 (recently renamed Plasmdoium mandrillii [18]), Plasmodium petersi, Hepatocystis spp. [13,18,19,20,21,22]. Additionally, Trypanosoma species, including Trypanosoma brucei brucei, Trypanosoma vivax, and Trypanosoma congolense, have been documented [16,17]. Despite the extensive research conducted on NHPs, Allochrocebus solatus remains unstudied in this regard, underscoring a critical gap in our understanding of its interactions with blood parasites and potential zoonotic risks.
From a “One Health” perspective, A. solatus may act as a reservoir for Plasmodium spp. and Trypanosoma spp., with potential implications for spillover to humans and other animals [18,23]. Given increasing habitat encroachment and human–wildlife interactions, it is crucial to understand these infections for both primate conservation and public health purposes [15]. Traditional microscopic methods for parasite detection have limitations, particularly in detecting low-level infections and differentiating closely related parasite species [24,25]. To address these challenges, this study employs nested PCR for enhanced sensitivity and specificity, while phylogenetic analysis will allow for precise identification of parasite lineages and potential zoonotic connections [15,26,27].
The present study aims to address this knowledge gap by investigating the diversity of blood parasites in captive A. solatus, with a focus on malaria and trypanosomiasis. By identifying species-specific health risks, this research will contribute to conservation efforts through the implementation of targeted health management strategies. This will ensure better protection of A. solatus and mitigate potential zoonotic threats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection

The diversity of Plasmodium spp. and Trypanosoma spp. in Allochrocebus solatus (Figure 1) at the CIRMF Primatology Centre was characterized. Most individuals were born in captivity at the center, while some were confiscated from private owners by Ministry of Water and Forestry agents in collaboration with Save Gabon’s Primates NGO. During annual health checks, blood samples were collected by trained veterinarians who adhered to animal welfare standards and used EDTA tubes. They extracted approximately 2 to 7 mL of blood per animal, depending on its weight, and immediately placed the tubes in a cool box for transport to the CIRMF’s Unite de Recherches en Ecologie de la Santé (URES) laboratories, where blood samples were stored at −20 °C. A total of 47 individuals were sampled. For additional details on the study population, see Table 1.

2.2. DNA Extraction and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Total DNA was extracted from approximately 200 µL of blood for each sample using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) following the manufacturer’s procedures.

2.3. Molecular Detection of Trypanosomes Parasites

Trypanosome detection utilized a two-step PCR with a recombinant Taq DNA polymerase kit (Life Technologies, France). The initial PCR targeted trypanosomal DNA using primers ITS1 and ITS2, amplifying regions of the 18S rRNA gene and 5.8S/28S rRNA [28]. The 25 μL reaction included 5 μL of DNA, 2.5 μL of 10× PCR buffer, 2 μL of dNTPs (10 mM each), 2 μL of MgCl2 (50 mM), 0.24 μL of each primer (10 μM), 0.3 μL of Taq polymerase, and 12.72 μL of RNase-free water. Amplification started with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 7 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 56 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min, with a final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. In the second step, a nested PCR was performed using primers ITS3 and ITS4 [28] in a 25 μL reaction using 1 μL of DNA from the first PCR product, along with the same PCR components except for 16.72 μL of RNase-free water. This protocol included an initial 5 min of denaturation at 95 °C, then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel in TAE buffer to confirm the presence of trypanosomal DNA. All positive samples underwent species identification through nested PCR targeting the 18S rRNA gene [29] to amplify a 2.0 kb fragment, followed by sequencing. The sequences were compared to GenBank entries for species identification.

2.4. Identification of Malaria Parasites

Malaria parasite detection followed a documented protocol [21,30]. Amplification targeted a portion of the cyt-b gene using nested PCR with two sets of primers: DW2–DW4, developed by [31], and Cytb1–Cytb2, originally designed by [32] for P. falciparum. Notably, these primers effectively amplify cyt-b from a broad spectrum of haemosporidian parasites in diverse hosts [21,27,33] and are suitable for taxonomic studies [34,35]. All PCR products (10 μL) were analysed on 1.5% agarose gels in a Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer. Sequencing was performed by Eurofins MWG.

2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

To assess the relationship between the obtained cyt-b sequences and known haemosporidian species, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using reference sequences from various haemosporidian parasites. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted on a matrix comprising the multiple alignment of the partial Cyt-b sequences (860 nucleotides) from malaria parasites and the ITS 18S sequences (1967 nucleotides) for trypanosmes, along with reference sequences from GenBank. Alignments were performed using ClustalW (v1.8.1) within the BioEdit software (v7.0.9.0; [36]). Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods were used for tree construction, with the most appropriate ML model identified by ModelTest [37] on the Akaike Information Criterion as the General Time Reversible (GTR) model with Gamma distribution and invariant sites (GTR + Gamma + I). The highest-likelihood tree and corresponding bootstrap support values were then generated using PhyML [38,39], available on the ATGC bioinformatics platform (http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr/, accessed on 16 January 2025). Tree construction involved Nearest Neighbor Interchange (NNI) and Subtree Pruning Regrafting (SPR) branch swapping, with 100 bootstrap replicates to ensure robustness of the process.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the R software (version 4.3.1), developed by the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, based in Vienna, Austria. Initially, descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize the infection prevalence rates according to parasite type (Trypanosoma spp., Hepatocystis spp., and mixed infections), age class (juveniles vs. adults), sex (male vs. female), and season (wet vs. dry). To evaluate whether infection rates varied significantly across demographic and environmental factors, Pearson’s Chi-square (χ2) tests were applied to compare proportions of infected individuals between groups. The analyses included the following: (i) Trypanosoma spp. infection prevalence by sex, age class, and season; (ii) malaria parasites (Hepatocystis spp.) infection prevalence by sex, age class, and season; and (iii) mixed infection prevalence by age and sex. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05 for all statistical tests.

3. Results

3.1. Detection of Trypanosoma spp.

Among the 47 blood samples collected from A. solatus, the overall prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. infection was 21.3% (10/47). Of the 10 individuals testing positive for Trypanosoma spp., 25% (7/28) were adults, while 15.8% (3/19) were juveniles. However, the difference in infection rates between adults and juveniles (7/28 vs. 3/19) was not statistically significant (p = 0.72). Three species of Trypanosoma spp. were found in this population: Trypanosoma brucei brucei (5/47), Trypanosoma vivax (3/47), and Trypanosoma congolense (2/47) (Figure 2).
The phylogenetic tree made from 18S rRNA sequences of Trypanosoma spp. shows three separate groups that correspond to T. brucei brucei, T. congolense, and T. vivax. Sequences obtained from A. solatus grouped closely with reference sequences of these species from GenBank, confirming their species. The T. brucei brucei clade was a strong group, with high support (>90%) from the analysis, showing that the isolates were closely related. The T. congolense and T. vivax sequences showed slightly more divergence, forming independent branches but still grouping reliably within their respective species clades. This tree shows that there are different types of Trypanosoma spp. infecting the same animals and highlights the genetic diversity of these parasites in monkeys.

3.2. Detection of Malaria Parasites

Malaria parasite infection prevalence detected by PCR targeting cytochrome b was 34.0% (16/47) among the analyzed blood samples. Of the 16 positive individuals, 25% (7/28) were adults, compared to 47.3% (9/19) in juveniles. However, the difference in infection rates between adults and juveniles was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). Only Hepatocystis spp. parasites were found in monkeys (Figure 3), previously identified in monkeys and bats in Africa, particularly in mandrills in Gabon.
The phylogenetic analysis based on a portion of the cytochrome b gene (875 bp) identified only Hepatocystis spp. was present among malaria parasites (Figure 3). The sequences obtained from A. solatus formed a well-supported monophyletic clade (bootstrap > 85%) that was distinct from Hepatocystis lineages previously reported in African bats, indicating that it was specific to its host. The Hepatocystis sequences from A. solatus grouped closely with lineages previously described in other African cercopithecine monkeys (e.g., Mandrillus sphinx and Cercopithecus cephus), suggesting that they share a common ancestor or that the parasites can cross species in the wild. The results also showed some genetic differences within the Hepatocystis complex, which could mean that there are hidden species or subspecies within it.

3.3. Mixed Infection Prevalence

Mixed infections of Plasmodium and Trypanosoma occurred in 12.8% (6/47) of cases. The most common combinations were Hepatocystis-Trypanosoma brucei brucei (50%, 3/6), Hepatocystis-Trypanosoma vivax (33.3%, 2/6), and Hepatocystis-Trypanosoma congolense (16.7%, 1/6) (Table 2).

4. Discussion

This study provides valuable insights into the parasitic infections affecting Allochrocebus solatus in captivity, highlighting the prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. and Plasmodium spp., as well as the occurrence of co-infections. These findings underscore the intricate interactions between parasites, their host, and the conditions of captivity, offering broader implications for wildlife health and conservation efforts.

4.1. Prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. Infections

The prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. infections in solatus was 21.3%, with a higher infection rate observed in adults (25%) compared to juveniles (15.8%). Although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.72), it aligns with findings in other African primates, where adults often exhibit higher prevalence due to prolonged exposure to vectors [16,17]. The trypanosome species identified in this study (Trypanosoma brucei brucei, T. vivax, and T. congolense) are principally transmitted by tsetse flies (Glossina), although other blood-sucking flies, such as stomoxids and tabanids, may also contribute to transmission [28,40].
The presence of Trypanosoma spp. in captive primates can be attributed to a combination of ecological, biological, and environmental factors. Primates held in captivity often reside in environments that remain conducive to vector proliferation, particularly when enclosures are situated near wetlands or areas with high humidity, as these factors favor the survival of Glossina [41,42]. Furthermore, the confinement of hosts within controlled environments increases the likelihood of host–vector interactions, thereby promoting parasite transmission [41,43]. Additionally, some infections may have been contracted prior to capture, as Trypanosoma spp. are known to establish chronic, asymptomatic infections that can persist undetected for extended periods without specific diagnostic tools [40,44]. Finally, natural reservoirs such as rodents and other mammals living near enclosures may sustain transmission cycles, increasing the risk of continued parasite exposure despite controlled conditions [45,46].
It is also important to consider the role of captivity stress in modulating immune responses, which may increase susceptibility to infections. Chronic stress in captive primates has been associated with elevated cortisol levels, leading to immunosuppression and reduced ability to control parasitic infections [47,48]. Earlier research on macaques and baboons has shown that stress-induced immune modulation can lead to increased parasite burdens and more severe disease progression in captive animals compared to their wild counterparts [49,50]. This suggests that stress-related immune alterations could partially explain the infection rates observed in solatus, emphasizing the need for improved management strategies to mitigate stress and enhance immune resilience in captive settings.
In captivity, consistent and prolonged exposure to vectors increases the risk of infection across age groups. Environmental factors, such as the proximity of enclosures to wetlands and the presence of unmanaged waste, create ideal conditions for vector breeding and transmission. Habitat fragmentation and human activities, as noted by Njiokou et al. [16], further exacerbate primate–vector interactions and facilitate the persistence of Trypanosoma spp. infections. The identification of T. brucei brucei in this study provides an important model for understanding zoonotic subspecies such as T. b. gambiense, the causative agent of human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness). This underscores the need for ongoing surveillance of Trypanosoma spp. in captive primates to better understand their epidemiology and potential zoonotic implications.

4.2. Prevalence of Plasmodium Infections

The present study observed a higher prevalence of malaria parasites (34.04%) than of Trypanosoma spp. infections, a trend that was particularly pronounced among juveniles (47.3%) compared to adults (25%). Although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.13), it suggests that juveniles, being immunologically naive, are more vulnerable to these infections [51]. This phenomenon is consistent with observations reported in previous studies, which indicate that adults develop partial immunity through repeated exposure, reducing their susceptibility to new infections [51,52]. The infection rates reported in this study also align with previous observations [13,14,18]. For instance, Boundenga et al. [18] documented variations in infection levels among different primate species in Gabon: 16% in Mandrillus sphinx, 40% in Cercocebus torquatus, and 75% in Cercopithecus cephus. A similar study in Cameroon reported a prevalence of 49.2% (144/292) in Cercopithecus nictitans [13]. Conversely, at the same sites in Gabon, infection rates were significantly lower for other cercopithecine species, with 0.48% (2/420) in mandrills and 0.86% (1/115) in other species [23]. These differences suggest that ecological factors, such as vector exposure or biological differences between host species, play an important role. In A. solatus, the high prevalence of malaria parasite infections could be linked to increased vector pressure in their natural habitat, where favorable conditions, such as high mosquito densities, elevate transmission risks.
The exclusive detection of Hepatocystis spp. in this population emphasizes particular host–parasite interactions. Hepatocystis infections have been documented in various African primates, notably Mandrillus sphinx, Cercopithecus cephus, and C. torquatus in Gabon [18]. In captive environments, high animal density and the presence of artificial water sources promote the proliferation of vectors [53,54]. Furthermore, it is well-documented that captivity-induced stress impairs immune function, thereby increasing host susceptibility to infections [55,56]. This stress-induced immune suppression may, therefore, provide a plausible explanation for the elevated infection rates observed in solatus.
Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the Hepatocystis spp. identified in A. solatus forms a monophyletic clade with lineages found in other African primates. This clade is distinct from the clade containing parasites of African bats [57]. This finding highlights the significant genetic diversity within the Hepatocystis genus. However, it remains uncertain whether this diversity indicates the presence of multiple taxa or a single, genetically varied species [13]. It is plausible that these distinct lineages correspond to different species. The present study, in concordance with earlier research [13,14,18,21], posits the hypothesis that diverse species of African monkeys may be infected by these disparate parasitic lineages, which appear to be unstructured with regard to host species or genus.

4.3. Co-Infections: Ecological and Immunological Implications

Co-infections involving Hepatocystis spp. strain and Trypanosoma spp. are of particular significance in regions where both parasites are endemic. These co-infections can result in complex interactions that affect disease progression, host immunity, and transmission dynamics. Research has demonstrated that the prevalence of Plasmodium spp. and Trypanosoma spp. co-infections exhibits variation [58]. The present study reports a co-infection rate of approximately 12.8% in the study population, with notable associations observed between Hepatocystis-Trypanosoma brucei brucei (50%) and Hepatocystis-Trypanosoma vivax (33.3%). These associations are frequently related to the occurrence of shared vector habitats and the presence of common exposure risks [59,60,61].
Such co-infections have the potential to exert a profound effect on the host. These co-infections have been demonstrated to exacerbate immunosuppressive effects, increase parasite burden, and disrupt host–pathogen interactions. Experimental studies in animal models, particularly mice, have demonstrated that co-infection with Plasmodium berghei and Trypanosoma brucei results in increased severity of both malaria and trypanosomiasis [62]. Intriguingly, Trypanosoma brucei infection has also been observed to offer protection to mice against subsequent malaria infection by modulating the host immune response [58,63].
The co-endemicity of malaria and trypanosomiasis suggests that these co-infections may influence the transmission dynamics of both diseases. For instance, the presence of Trypanosoma spp. infections in animal reservoirs has been demonstrated to alter the vectorial capacity of Anopheles mosquitoes for Plasmodium parasites [61]. A comprehensive understanding of these interactions is imperative for the formulation of integrated disease management strategies. Further research is required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying PlasmodiumTrypanosoma co-infections and their impact on host immunity and disease transmission. Such insights are essential for predicting the effects of co-infections on host populations and for designing effective control measures in regions where both parasites are prevalent.

4.4. Implications for Public Health and Conservation

The presence of Trypanosoma spp. and Plasmodium spp. in captive A. solatus has significant implications for public health and conservation, particularly in regions where there is frequent interaction between humans and wildlife. While Trypanosoma brucei brucei and T. vivax primarily infect animals, there is evidence of atypical human cases that suggest potential zoonotic transmission [64,65]. Furthermore, certain Plasmodium species that infect non-human primates have the potential to infect humans, particularly in areas where vector control measures are deemed inadequate. Parasite spillover may occur via multiple pathways, including vector contact, environmental contamination, and direct interactions, as evidenced by documented cases of Plasmodium knowlesi transmission from macaques to humans in Southeast Asia [66,67]. The increasing encroachment of human habitats onto wildlife habitats, such as those of primates, has the potential to facilitate bidirectional transmission of infectious diseases, including those of primates to humans, and thus the risk of emerging infectious diseases. In order to mitigate these risks, integrated vector control strategies should be prioritized, including the modification of habitats to limit vector breeding, the use of insecticide-treated nets, and targeted spraying to disrupt transmission cycles. Additionally, continuous health monitoring programs involving both primates and human populations are essential for tracking infection dynamics and enabling early intervention. The findings emphasize the importance of One Health approaches, which emphasize collaboration between wildlife conservationists, public health authorities, and local communities to ensure both primate conservation and human health security.

4.5. Study Limitations and Future Directions

This study’s relatively small sample size (47 individuals) may limit the generalizability of the results. Additionally, focusing solely on PCR-detectable parasites excludes other pathogens, such as viruses and bacteria, that may impact A. solatus. Comparative analyses with wild populations could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of captivity on parasitic prevalence. Future studies should adopt a multi-pathogen approach and include larger sample sizes to address these gaps.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study provides valuable preliminary data on the diversity of blood parasites circulating in captive A. solatus in Gabon, revealing significant infection rates by Hepatocystis spp. (34.0%) and Trypanosoma spp. (21.3%), as well as cases of co-infection in 12.8% of individuals. Although no significant age or sex differences were observed, the results highlight the complexity of host–parasite interactions in semi-captive environments and the increased susceptibility of these primates to vector-borne diseases. Given the frequent proximity of these captive colonies to human activities, our results highlight the importance of establishing systematic health surveillance of captive primates. Such surveillance not only improves animal welfare and optimizes conservation efforts but also enables early detection of pathogens with zoonotic potential.
The adoption of an integrated approach based on the One Health concept appears essential to anticipate and control health risks at the human–animal–environment interface. The detection of Trypanosoma spp. and Hepatocystis spp. lineages with known or suspected zoonotic capacity reinforces the need to implement unified management strategies, mobilizing the veterinary, environmental, and public health sectors. Finally, the identification of A. solatus as a potential reservoir host for several blood-feeding parasites calls for further research into its ecological role in transmission cycles. A better understanding of these dynamics is essential for the development of targeted and effective interventions for the conservation of endangered species and the prevention of emerging diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.B.; methodology, S.P.A., M.N. and F.M.; software, S.P.A. and L.B.; validation, L.B. and B.N.; formal analysis, S.P.A. and L.B.; investigation, M.N. and S.P.A.; resources, B.N.; data curation, L.B. and F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.A. and M.N.; writing—review and editing, L.B., B.N., F.M. and P.M.-N. visualization, B.N. and F.M.; supervision, L.B.; project administration, L.B.; funding acquisition, L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the National Ethics Committee of Gabon and approved by the Gabonese Ministries of Water and Forests, Higher Education, Scientific Research and Innovation (Approval No. AR0031/10/MENESRESI/CENAREST/CG/CST/CSAR, 10 March 2013). In addition, the study was approved by the Scientific Committee of the Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (CIRMF) to ensure compliance with the ethical principles of animal research (15 June 2021). All samples were collected in strict compliance with animal welfare standards and, in the case of domestic animals, consent was obtained from the owners prior to sampling.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated in this work are available in this article. In addition, the sequences obtained have been submitted to GenBank (PV425447-PV425455 for Trypanosomes parasites and PV454983-PV454997 for malaria parasites).

Acknowledgments

We express our thanks to the veterinarians who helped collect samples. We acknowledge especially the different teams of CIRMF, which participated in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CIRMFCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherches Medicales de Franceville
URESUnite de Recherches en Ecologie de la Santé
SOLSolatus

References

  1. Motsch, P.; Le Flohic, G.; Dilger, C.; Delahaye, A.; Chateau-Smith, C.; Couette, S. Degree of Terrestrial Activity of the Elusive Sun-Tailed Monkey (Cercopithecus solatus) in Gabon: Comparative Study of Behavior and Postcranial Morphometric Data. Am. J. Primatol. 2015, 77, 1060–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Harrison, M.J.S. A New Species of Guenon (Genus Cercopithecus) from Gabon. J. Zool. 1988, 215, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gautier, J.-P.; Moysan, F.; Feistner, A.T.; Loireau, J.-N.; Cooper, R.W. The Distribution of Cercopithecus (Lhoesti) solatus, an Endemic Guenon of Gabon. Rev. Décol. 1992, 47, 367–381. [Google Scholar]
  4. Peignot, P.; Fontaine, B.; Wickings, E.J. Habitat Exploitation, Diet and Some Data on Reproductive Behaviour in a Semi-Free-Ranging Colony of Cercopithecus Lhoesti solatus, a Guenon Species Recently Discovered in Gabon. Folia Primatol. 1999, 70, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abernethy, K.; Maisels, F.; Coad, L. Allochrocebus solatus: The IUCN Red List of Threatened. 2019. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/4230/92346555 (accessed on 27 November 2024).
  6. Brugière, D.; Gautier, J.-P.; Lahm, S. Additional Data on the Distribution of Cercopithecus (Lhoesti) solatus. Folia Primatol. 1998, 69, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brugiere, D.; Gautier, J.-P. Status and Conservation of the Sun-Tailed Guenon Cercopithecus solatus, Gabon’s Endemic Monkey. Oryx 1999, 33, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leendertz, F.H.; Pauli, G.; Maetz-Rensing, K.; Boardman, W.; Nunn, C.; Ellerbrok, H.; Jensen, S.A.; Junglen, S.; Christophe, B. Pathogens as Drivers of Population Declines: The Importance of Systematic Monitoring in Great Apes and Other Threatened Mammals. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 131, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ryan, S.J.; Walsh, P.D. Consequences of Non-Intervention for Infectious Disease in African Great Apes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e29030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dibakou, S.-E.; Ngoubangoye, B.; Boundenga, L.; Ntie, S.; Moussadji, C.; Tsoumbou, T.-A.; Setchell, J.M. Preliminary Assessment of Gastrointestinal Parasites of the Sun-Tailed Monkey (Allochrocebus solatus) in a Semi-Free-Ranging Colony. J. Med. Primatol. 2022, 51, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chapman, C.A.; Gillespie, T.R.; Goldberg, T.L. Primates and the Ecology of Their Infectious Diseases: How Will Anthropogenic Change Affect Host-Parasite Interactions? Evol. Anthropol. Issues News Rev. 2005, 14, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beer, B.E.; Bailes, E.; Goeken, R.; Dapolito, G.; Coulibaly, C.; Norley, S.G.; Kurth, R.; Gautier, J.-P.; Gautier-Hion, A.; Vallet, D.; et al. Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) from Sun-Tailed Monkeys (Cercopithecus solatus): Evidence for Host-Dependent Evolution of SIV within the C. lhoesti Superspecies. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 7734–7744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ayouba, A.; Mouacha, F.; Learn, G.H.; Mpoudi-Ngole, E.; Rayner, J.C.; Sharp, P.M.; Hahn, B.H.; Delaporte, E.; Peeters, M. Ubiquitous Hepatocystis Infections, but No Evidence of Plasmodium falciparum-like Malaria Parasites in Wild Greater Spot-Nosed Monkeys (Cercopithecus nictitans). Int. J. Parasitol. 2012, 42, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Thurber, M.I.; Ghai, R.R.; Hyeroba, D.; Weny, G.; Tumukunde, A.; Chapman, C.A.; Wiseman, R.W.; Dinis, J.; Steeil, J.; Greiner, E.C. Co-Infection and Cross-Species Transmission of Divergent Hepatocystis Lineages in a Wild African Primate Community. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boundenga, L.; Makouloutou-Nzassi, P.; Ngoubangoye, B. A Review of Gabonese Gorillas and Their Pathogens: Diversity, Transfer and One Health Approach to Avoid Future Outbreaks? Front. Parasitol. 2023, 2, 1115316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Njiokou, F.; Laveissière, C.; Simo, G.; Nkinin, S.; Grébaut, P.; Cuny, G.; Herder, S. Wild Fauna as a Probable Animal Reservoir for Trypanosoma brucei gambiense in Cameroon. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2006, 6, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Herder, S.; Simo, G.; Nkinin, S.; Njiokou, F. Identification of Trypanosomes in Wild Animals from Southern Cameroon Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Parasite 2002, 9, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boundenga, L.; Ngoubangoye, B.; Mombo, I.M.; Tsoubmou, T.A.; Renaud, F.; Rougeron, V.; Prugnolle, F. Extensive Diversity of Malaria Parasites Circulating in Central African Bats and Monkeys. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 10578–10586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Turner, T.R.; Lambrecht, F.L.; Jolly, C.J. Hepatocystis Parasitemia in Wild Kenya Vervet Monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). J. Med. Primatol. 1982, 11, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hablolvarid, M.H.; Habibi, G. Detection of Hepatocystis Sp. Infection in Vervet Monkeys (Chlorocebus pygrythrus) Imported from Tanzania Using Molecular and Microscopic Methods. Arch. Razi Inst. 2022, 77, 2165–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prugnolle, F.; Durand, P.; Neel, C.; Ollomo, B.; Ayala, F.J.; Arnathau, C.; Etienne, L.; Mpoudi-Ngole, E.; Nkoghe, D.; Leroy, E.; et al. African Great Apes Are Natural Hosts of Multiple Related Malaria Species, Including Plasmodium falciparum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1458–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dibakou, S.E.; Souza, A.; Boundenga, L.; Givalois, L.; Mercier-Delarue, S.; Simon, F.; Prugnolle, F.; Huchard, E.; Charpentier, M.J. Ecological, Parasitological and Individual Determinants of Plasma Neopterin Levels in a Natural Mandrill Population. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 11, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ngoubangoye, B.; Boundenga, L.; Arnathau, C.; Mombo, I.M.; Durand, P.; Tsoumbou, T.-A.; Otoro, B.V.; Sana, R.; Okouga, A.-P.; Moukodoum, N.; et al. The Host Specificity of Ape Malaria Parasites Can Be Broken in Confined Environments. Int. J. Parasitol. 2016, 46, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Perkins, S.L. Malaria’s Many Mates: Past, Present, and Future of the Systematics of the Order Haemosporida. J. Parasitol. 2014, 100, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Perkins, S.L. Species Concepts and Malaria Parasites: Detecting a Cryptic Species of Plasmodium. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2000, 267, 2345–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Martinsen, E.S.; Blumberg, B.J.; Eisen, R.J.; Schall, J.J. Avian Hemosporidian Parasites from Northern California Oak Woodland and Chaparral Habitats. J. Wildl. Dis. 2008, 44, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boundenga, L.; Makanga, B.; Ollomo, B.; Gilabert, A.; Rougeron, V.; Mve-Ondo, B.; Arnathau, C.; Durand, P.; Moukodoum, N.D.; Okouga, A.-P.; et al. Haemosporidian Parasites of Antelopes and Other Vertebrates from Gabon, Central Africa. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Auty, H.; Anderson, N.E.; Picozzi, K.; Lembo, T.; Mubanga, J.; Hoare, R.; Fyumagwa, R.D.; Mable, B.; Hamill, L.; Cleaveland, S.; et al. Trypanosome Diversity in Wildlife Species from the Serengeti and Luangwa Valley Ecosystems. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Votýpka, J.; Rádrová, J.; Skalický, T.; Jirků, M.; Jirsová, D.; Mihalca, A.D.; D’Amico, G.; Petrželková, K.J.; Modrý, D.; Lukeš, J. A Tsetse and Tabanid Fly Survey of African Great Apes Habitats Reveals the Presence of a Novel Trypanosome Lineage but the Absence of Trypanosoma brucei. Int. J. Parasitol. 2015, 45, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ollomo, B.; Durand, P.; Prugnolle, F.; Douzery, E.; Arnathau, C.; Nkoghe, D.; Leroy, E.; Renaud, F. A New Malaria Agent in African Hominids. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Perkins, S.L.; Schall, J.J. A Molecular Phylogeny of Malarial Parasites Recovered from Cytochrome b Gene Sequences. J. Parasitol. 2002, 88, 972–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schwöbel, B.; Alifrangis, M.; Salanti, A.; Jelinek, T. Different Mutation Patterns of Atovaquone Resistance to Plasmodium falciparum in Vitro and in Vivo: Rapid Detection of Codon 268 Polymorphisms in the Cytochrome b as Potential in Vivo Resistance Marker. Malar. J. 2003, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Longo-Pendy, N.-M.; Boundenga, L.; Makanga, B.K.; Mbou-Boutambe, C.; Bouafou, L.; Akone-Ella, O.; Nkoghe-Nkoghe, L.C.; Lekana-Douki, S.; Lekana-Douki, J.-B.; Kengne, P. A Cross-Sectional Study of Malaria Transmission in Suggests the Existence of a Potential Bridge Vector Susceptible of Ensuring the Transfer of Simian Malaria Parasites to Humans. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Martinsen, E.S.; Paperna, I.; Schall, J.J. Morphological versus Molecular Identification of Avian Haemosporidia: An Exploration of Three Species Concepts. Parasitology 2006, 133, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Santiago-Alarcon, D.; Outlaw, D.C.; Ricklefs, R.E.; Parker, P.G. Phylogenetic Relationships of Haemosporidian Parasites in New World Columbiformes, with Emphasis on the Endemic Galapagos Dove. Int. J. Parasitol. 2010, 40, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  37. Posada, D. ModelTest Server: A Web-Based Tool for the Statistical Selection of Models of Nucleotide Substitution Online. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W700–W703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lemoine, F.; Correia, D.; Lefort, V.; Doppelt-Azeroual, O.; Mareuil, F.; Cohen-Boulakia, S.; Gascuel, O. NGPhylogeny.Fr: New Generation Phylogenetic Services for Non-Specialists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W260–W265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guindon, S.; Lethiec, F.; Duroux, P.; Gascuel, O. PHYML Online--a Web Server for Fast Maximum Likelihood-Based Phylogenetic Inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W557–W559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kasozi, K.I.; Zirintunda, G.; Ssempijja, F.; Buyinza, B.; Alzahrani, K.J.; Matama, K.; Nakimbugwe, H.N.; Alkazmi, L.; Onanyang, D.; Bogere, P. Epidemiology of Trypanosomiasis in Wildlife—Implications for Humans at the Wildlife Interface in Africa. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 621699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mounioko, F.; Maganga, G.D.; Mavoungou, J.F.; Koumba, C.R.Z.; Koumba, A.A.; Sevidzem, S.L.; Tamesse, J.L.; Simo, G.; M’batchi, B. Molecular Screening of Trypanosoma Spp. in Glossina, Stomoxys and Tabanids in the Moukalaba Doudou National Park (South-West, Gabon). World J. Vet. Sci. 2018, 6, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mounioko, F.; Dibakou, E.S.; Zinga-Koumba, C.R.; Mbang-Nguema, O.A.; Acapovi-Yao, G.; Mutambwe, S.; Mavoungou, J.F. Rythme d’activité Journalière de Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, Vecteur Majeur de La Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine Dans Le Parc National de Moukalaba Doudou (Sud-Ouest Gabon). Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2015, 9, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kohagne Tongué, L.; Mengue M’Eyi, P.; Mimpfoundi, R.; Louis, F.J. Glossina feeding habits and diversity of species of trypanosomes in an active focus of human African trypanosomiasis in Gabon. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1990 2010, 103, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vincendeau, P.; Bouteille, B. Immunology and Immunopathology of African Trypanosomiasis. An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2006, 78, 645–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maganga, G.D.; Boundenga, L.; Ologui-Minkue-Edzo, E.J.; Kombila, L.B.; Mebaley, T.G.N.; Kumulungui, B.; Mavoungou, J.F. Frequency and Diversity of Trypanosomes in Sheep and Goats from Mongo County in South Gabon, Central Africa. Vet. World 2020, 13, 2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Boundenga, L.; Mombo, I.M.; Augustin, M.-O.; Barthélémy, N.; Nzassi, P.M.; Moukodoum, N.D.; Rougeron, V.; Prugnolle, F. Molecular Identification of Trypanosome Diversity in Domestic Animals Reveals the Presence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense in Historical Foci of Human African Trypanosomiasis in Gabon. Pathog. Basel Switz. 2022, 11, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Capitanio, J.P.; Mendoza, S.P.; Bentson, K.L. Personality Characteristics and Basal Cortisol Concentrations in Adult Male Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta). Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004, 29, 1300–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Clarke, A.S.; Boinski, S. Temperament in Nonhuman Primates. Am. J. Primatol. 1995, 37, 103–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Muehlenbein, M.P.; Watts, D.P. The Costs of Dominance: Testosterone, Cortisol and Intestinal Parasites in Wild Male Chimpanzees. Biopsychosoc. Med. 2010, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gust, D.A.; Gordon, T.P.; Brodie, A.R.; McClure, H.M. Effect of a Preferred Companion in Modulating Stress in Adult Female Rhesus Monkeys. Physiol. Behav. 1994, 55, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. De Nys, H.M.; Calvignac-Spencer, S.; Thiesen, U.; Boesch, C.; Wittig, R.M.; Mundry, R.; Leendertz, F.H. Age-Related Effects on Malaria Parasite Infection in Wild Chimpanzees. Biol. Lett. 2013, 9, 20121160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. De Nys, H.M.; Löhrich, T.; Wu, D.; Calvignac-Spencer, S.; Leendertz, F.H. Wild African Great Apes as Natural Hosts of Malaria Parasites: Current Knowledge and Research Perspectives. Primate Biol. 2017, 4, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lee, J.M.; Wasserman, R.J.; Gan, J.Y.; Wilson, R.F.; Rahman, S.; Yek, S.H. Human Activities Attract Harmful Mosquitoes in a Tropical Urban Landscape. Ecohealth 2020, 17, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Longo-Pendy, N.-M.; Sevidzem, S.L.; Makanga, B.K.; Ndotit-Manguiengha, S.; Boussougou-Sambe, S.T.; Obame Ondo Kutomy, P.; Obame-Nkoghe, J.; Nkoghe-Nkoghe, L.-C.; Ngossanga, B.; Mvoubou, F.K.; et al. Assessment of Environmental and Spatial Factors Influencing the Establishment of Anopheles gambiae Larval Habitats in the Malaria Endemic Province of Woleu-Ntem, Northern Gabon. Malar. J. 2024, 23, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Oppler, S.H.; Palmer, S.D.; Phu, S.N.; Graham, M.L. The Role of Behavioral Management in Enhancing Clinical Care and Efficiency, Minimizing Social Disruption, and Promoting Welfare in Captive Primates. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Costantini, D. A Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Immune Response and Infection on Oxidative Status in Vertebrates. Conserv. Physiol. 2022, 10, coac018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Putaporntip, C.; Jongwutiwes, S.; Thongaree, S.; Seethamchai, S.; Grynberg, P.; Hughes, A.L. Ecology of Malaria Parasites Infecting Southeast Asian Macaques: Evidence from Cytochrome b Sequences. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19, 3466–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pereira, L.; Oliveira, F.; Townsend, S.; Metangmo, S.; Meneses, C.; Moore, I.N.; Brodskyn, C.I.; Valenzuela, J.G.; Magez, S.; Kamhawi, S. Coinfection With Trypanosoma brucei Confers Protection Against Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. LaDeau, S.L.; Allan, B.F.; Leisnham, P.T.; Levy, M.Z. The Ecological Foundations of Transmission Potential and Vector-Borne Disease in Urban Landscapes. Funct. Ecol. 2015, 29, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lambin, E.F.; Tran, A.; Vanwambeke, S.O.; Linard, C.; Soti, V. Pathogenic Landscapes: Interactions between Land, People, Disease Vectors, and Their Animal Hosts. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2010, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fofana, M.; Mitri, C.; Diallo, D.; Rotureau, B.; Diagne, C.T.; Gaye, A.; Ba, Y.; Dieme, C.; Diallo, M.; Dia, I. Possible Influence of Plasmodium/Trypanosoma Co-Infections on the Vectorial Capacity of Anopheles Mosquitoes. BMC Res. Notes 2020, 13, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ademola, I.O.; Odeniran, P.O. Co-Infection with Plasmodium berghei and Trypanosoma brucei Increases Severity of Malaria and Trypanosomiasis in Mice. Acta Trop. 2016, 159, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sanches-Vaz, M.; Temporão, A.; Luis, R.; Nunes-Cabaço, H.; Mendes, A.M.; Goellner, S.; Carvalho, T.; Figueiredo, L.M.; Prudêncio, M. Trypanosoma brucei Infection Protects Mice against Malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1008145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Truc, P.; Büscher, P.; Cuny, G.; Gonzatti, M.I.; Jannin, J.; Joshi, P.; Juyal, P.; Lun, Z.-R.; Mattioli, R.; Pays, E.; et al. Atypical Human Infections by Animal Trypanosomes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Desquesnes, M.; Gonzatti, M.; Sazmand, A.; Thévenon, S.; Bossard, G.; Boulangé, A.; Gimonneau, G.; Truc, P.; Herder, S.; Ravel, S.; et al. A Review on the Diagnosis of Animal Trypanosomoses. Parasit. Vectors 2022, 15, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cuenca, P.R.; Key, S.; Jumail, A.; Surendra, H.; Ferguson, H.M.; Drakeley, C.J.; Fornace, K. Epidemiology of the Zoonotic Malaria Plasmodium knowlesi in Changing Landscapes. In Advances in Parasitology; Drakeley, C., Ed.; Current Research on Naturally Transmitted; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; Volume 113, pp. 225–286. [Google Scholar]
  67. Johnson, E.; Sunil Kumar Sharma, R.; Ruiz Cuenca, P.; Byrne, I.; Salgado-Lynn, M.; Suraya Shahar, Z.; Col Lin, L.; Zulkifli, N.; Dilaila Mohd Saidi, N.; Drakeley, C.; et al. Landscape Drives Zoonotic Malaria Prevalence in Non-Human Primates. eLife 2024, 12, RP88616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Some solatus individuals from the group are living in captivity at CIRMF’s Primatology Centre.
Figure 1. Some solatus individuals from the group are living in captivity at CIRMF’s Primatology Centre.
Amh 70 00016 g001
Figure 2. 18S rRNA-based phylogeny of trypanosomes from Allochrocebus solatus. Maximum likelihood tree with bootstrap values for 1000 replicates. 18S rRNA sequences generated in this study are in red, and Genbank sequences are accession numbers before the parasite names. Each sequence is labeled with the A. solatus number (e.g., Sol-n13, accession number: PV425447-PV425455).
Figure 2. 18S rRNA-based phylogeny of trypanosomes from Allochrocebus solatus. Maximum likelihood tree with bootstrap values for 1000 replicates. 18S rRNA sequences generated in this study are in red, and Genbank sequences are accession numbers before the parasite names. Each sequence is labeled with the A. solatus number (e.g., Sol-n13, accession number: PV425447-PV425455).
Amh 70 00016 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships between the cytochrome b sequences of malaria parasites obtained in this study and those of known Plasmodium species (represented by their accession numbers). The tree was constructed using cytochrome b (cyt-b) sequences of 875 bp. Red indicates sequences from Allochrocebus solatus. Bootstrap values are given at each node.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships between the cytochrome b sequences of malaria parasites obtained in this study and those of known Plasmodium species (represented by their accession numbers). The tree was constructed using cytochrome b (cyt-b) sequences of 875 bp. Red indicates sequences from Allochrocebus solatus. Bootstrap values are given at each node.
Amh 70 00016 g003
Table 1. Summary of data characterizing the population studied.
Table 1. Summary of data characterizing the population studied.
SexJuvenileAdultsTotal
Males91221
Females101626
Total192847
Table 2. The occurrence of mixed infection association results in infection.
Table 2. The occurrence of mixed infection association results in infection.
AssociationsAssociationsPercentage
Heptacystis sp.-Trypanosoma brucei brucei3/650%
Heptacystis sp.-Trypanosoma vivax2/633.3%
Heptacystis sp.-Trypanosoma congolense1/616.7%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ambourouet, S.P.; Mounioko, F.; Makouloutou-Nzassi, P.; Nzale, M.; Ngoubangoye, B.; Boundenga, L. Blood Parasite Diversity and Zoonotic Risk in Captive Sun-Tailed Monkeys from Gabon. Acta Microbiol. Hell. 2025, 70, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/amh70020016

AMA Style

Ambourouet SP, Mounioko F, Makouloutou-Nzassi P, Nzale M, Ngoubangoye B, Boundenga L. Blood Parasite Diversity and Zoonotic Risk in Captive Sun-Tailed Monkeys from Gabon. Acta Microbiologica Hellenica. 2025; 70(2):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/amh70020016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ambourouet, Sarah Parfaite, Franck Mounioko, Patrice Makouloutou-Nzassi, Monique Nzale, Barthelemy Ngoubangoye, and Larson Boundenga. 2025. "Blood Parasite Diversity and Zoonotic Risk in Captive Sun-Tailed Monkeys from Gabon" Acta Microbiologica Hellenica 70, no. 2: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/amh70020016

APA Style

Ambourouet, S. P., Mounioko, F., Makouloutou-Nzassi, P., Nzale, M., Ngoubangoye, B., & Boundenga, L. (2025). Blood Parasite Diversity and Zoonotic Risk in Captive Sun-Tailed Monkeys from Gabon. Acta Microbiologica Hellenica, 70(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/amh70020016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop