Property Valuation in Latvia and Brazil: A Multifaceted Approach Integrating Algorithm, Geographic Information System, Fuzzy Logic, and Civil Engineering Insights
Abstract
:1. Introduction and Background
2. Literature Review
2.1. Challenges in the Latvian Real Estate Market
2.2. Importance of Building Inspections
2.3. Methodologies in Property Valuation
2.4. Fuzzy Logic and Property Valuation
2.5. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and the Apriori Algorithm
2.6. Geographic Information Systems (GISs)
2.7. Real Estate Dynamics between Latvia and Brazil
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Materials
- Notepad++ v8.6.2 (64-bit): for text editing and file preparation.
- Weka Software version 3.8.3 (c) 1999–2010—The University of Waikato—Hamilton, New Zealand: for machine learning tasks, including association rule mining.
- InFuzzy Software version V.01—Registration with INPI protocol 020110031632 on (25 March 2011): as a computational modeler for fuzzy logic applications.
- LibreOffice 7.2: for data documentation and reporting.
3.2. Methodology Overview
3.3. Data Collection and Experimental Design
- Traditional statistical methods were applied in the central area, addressing multicollinearity through regression analysis.
- The chosen model for price forecasting was an ANCOVA model, yielding a fit of less than 58%.
- The regression equation was determined as Price = 430 + 12.58 × Area. Detailed statistical results are available in the published article (https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.25.2019.022) (accessed on 10 October 2020).
- Traditional statistical methods facilitated property evaluations.
- Regression analysis was conducted without multicollinearity, revealing subjective uncertainties in appraisals.
- The incorporation of fuzzy logic improved the valuation accuracy, resulting in an estimated score of EUR 747.50/m2 within an 80% confidence interval.
- For comprehensive statistical details, refer to https://doi.org/10.22616/j.balticsurveying.2020.007 (accessed on 11 July 2021).
- A comparative analysis was performed between the regression analysis and fuzzy logic.
- Linguistic expressions were utilized to represent building conditions, illustrating the impact of heuristics on valuation.
- The fuzzy logic approach resulted in a 15% score difference, confirming the influence of the building conservation status.
- More details can be found in the poster presented at the second Multidisciplinary Conference for Young Researchers (29–30 November 2021, Sumy, Ukraine). To consult, see page 62, available at
- (1)
- https://agrisci-ua.com/conferences/ (accessed on 6 March 2022).
- (2)
- 1.
- Step 1: Selecting scattered data
- 2.
- Step 2: Preparing files for association rules
- 3.
- Step 3: The generation of association rules
- 4.
- Step 4: Fuzzy inference process
- 5.
- Step 5: Interpreting the precision of the experimental model
4. Results
Experiment in Jelgava
- Approximately 48% of the apartments required some form of maintenance. Among these, 13% of the properties had significant maintenance issues that would require extensive labor. Severe issues were identified in 6% of the properties, posing safety risks due to poor conditions in essential facilities. These results offer a strategic framework for prioritizing repairs based on severity.
- The market price of apartments was found to vary based on their conservation status. Buildings that required substantial repairs were less attractive to buyers and took longer to sell, as the cost of the necessary renovations was a deterrent. Several properties had severe conservation issues, contributing to urban decay and aesthetic deterioration in the city.
- Error metrics were used to compare property values predicted by the fuzzy model with observed market data. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) ranged between 9% and 10%, indicating a high level of accuracy. A MAPE below 10% is considered excellent, while values below 20% are deemed good in this context.
- The defuzzification process, which converts fuzzy values into a precise numerical result, was applied to forecast apartment prices. For example, for a 48 m2 apartment, the defuzzified price was estimated at EUR 416.67 per square meter, compared with the market average of EUR 522 per square meter. These estimates aligned closely with real estate prices provided by local agencies.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ong, S.E.; Yang, L. The accuracy of property valuations: A review of methodologies and factors influencing valuers’ judgement. J. Prop. Res. 2019, 36, 70–92. [Google Scholar]
- Berziņa, I.; Lībiete, Z. The evolution of property valuation principles in Latvia. Balt. J. Real Estate Econ. Constr. Manag. 2015, 3, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
- Kļaviņš, M.; Mežinska, K. Property valuation and real estate market development in Latvia: Challenges and opportunities. Balt. J. Real Estate Econ. Constr. Manag. 2020, 8, 72–90. [Google Scholar]
- AOļehnovičs, A.; Kuzmina-Merlino, I. The development of real estate valuation in Latvia: Past, present, and future perspectives. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 2019, 37, 641–659. [Google Scholar]
- Šmigelskas, K.; Karaliūtė, R. Property valuation in Latvia: From centralized planning to market-driven economy. Balt. J. Manag. 2020, 15, 143–159. [Google Scholar]
- Ministru kabineta. Par būvniecības nacionālo programmu. Augusta Rīkojums Nr. 478 ‘Par Būvniecības Nacionālo Programmu’. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 125, 04.09.2002. Retrieved 4 January 2021. 2002. Available online: https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=65990u (accessed on 12 October 2021).
- Luksa, M. Beidzas Daudzdzīvokļu Mājas Kalpošanas Termiņš. Ar Ko Sākt Atjaunošanu? LV Portāls, 07.05.2019. 2019. Available online: https://lvportals.lv/skaidrojumi/303999-beidzas-daudzdzivoklu-majas-kalposanas-termins-ar-ko-sakt-atjaunosanu-2019 (accessed on 7 November 2019).
- Faqih, F.; Zayed, T.; Soliman, E. Factors and defects analysis of physical and environmental condition of buildings. J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 2020, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villanueva, M.M. A Importância da Manutenção Preventiva Para o Bom Desempenho da Edificação (The Importance of Preventive Maintenance for the Good Performance of the Building). Univeridade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Departmaneto de Construção Civil. 2015. Available online: https://docplayer.com.br/4794265-A-importancia-da-manutencao-preventiva-para-o-bom-desempenho-da-edificacao.html (accessed on 14 May 2018). (In Portuguese).
- Silva, A.d.P.; Parisi Jonov, C.M. Falhas e Patologias dos Materiais de Construção (Failures and Pathologies of Construction Materials). Belo Horizonte. 2018. Available online: https://demc.ufmg.br/adriano/Falhas_Patologias_2018.pdf (accessed on 7 May 2019). (In Portuguese).
- Maia, E.A. Vícios Construtivos x Falta (Falhas) de Manutenção. Palestra no II Seminário Nacional de Engenharia de Avaliações e Perícias. Brasília, 27/03/2018. Available online: https://ibape-nacional.com.br/biblioteca/wp.../II-SemNac-Eng-Av-Per-Elcio-Maia.pdf (accessed on 24 September 2019).
- Kahler, D.; Kanapicki, C. Civil engineering responsibilities in special inspection. In Proceedings of the Conference: ASCE Texas Section Fall 2012, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 8 November 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco, L.S. Contribuição ao Estudo de Sistemas de Inspeção e Conservação Predial: Levantamento de Boas Práticas e Identificação de Padrões de Deterioração com Base na Análise de Dados de Laudos de Inspeção (Contribution to the Study of Building Inspection and Conservation Systems: Survey of Good Practices and Identification of Deterioration Patterns Based on the Analysis of Data from Inspection Reports—Doctoral Thesis). Rio Grande do Sul. 2017. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/156779 (accessed on 2 March 2019). (In Portuguese).
- IBAPE/SP. Inspeção predial ”a saude dos edificios” (Building Inspection “the Health of Buildings”). Instituto Brasileiro de Avaliações e Perícias de Engenharia de São Paulo. Editora Leud, 2a Edição. 2015. Available online: https://www.ibape-sp.org.br/adm/upload/uploads/1541781803-Cartilha-Inspecao_Predial_a_Saude_dos_Edificios.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2020). (In Portuguese).
- Mokhtar, E.S.; Wan Mohd Zaki, W.N.A.; Nasirun, N.; Hanif, F.A.; Nugraha, I. Geospatial Site Suitability for Sustainable Property Investment. In Charting the Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Science and Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 49–64. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-3434-8_5 (accessed on 2 August 2021).
- Gružauskas, V.; Kriščiūnas, A.; Čalnerytė, D.; Navickas, V. Analytical method for correction coefficient determination for applying comparative method for real estate aluation. Real Estate Manag. Valuat. 2020, 28, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ince, R.A.A. Measuring Multivariate Redundant Information with Pointwise Common Change in Surprisal. Entropy 2017, 19, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surgelas, V.; Arhipova, I.; Pukite, V. Analysis of Different Approaches to Real Estate Appraisal. Res. Rural. Dev. 2019, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haig, B.D. What can psychology’s statistics reformers learn from the error- statistical perspective? Methods Psychol. 2020, 2, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegel, A.F. Practical Business Statistics; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Surgelas, V.; Pukite, V.; Arhipova, I. Improvements in the civil engineering focused on the real estate appraisal with the use of artificial intelligence and Fuzzy Logic. J. Balt. Surv. 2020, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajani, F.; Morano, P.; Locurcio, M.; D’Addabbo, N. Property Valuations in Times of Crisis: Artificial Neural Networks and Evolutionary Algorithms in Comparison. In Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2015, ICCSA 2015, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference, Banff, AB, Canada, 22–25 June 2015; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 9157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, J.; Smith, R. The Impact of Building Condition on Property Value. J. Real Estate Res. 2019, 44, 357–378. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, M.; Johnson, K. Deferred Maintenance and Property Valuation: A Case Study Approach. J. Prop. Manag. 2018, 36, 145–163. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.; Wang, Q. Mitigating Buyer Risk Through Building Inspections: Evidence from the Real Estate Market. J. Hous. Econ. 2020, 28, 101–120. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, L.; White, S. Transparency and Credibility in Property Valuations: The Role of Building Inspection Criteria. J. Prop. Valuat. 2017, 29, 432–450. [Google Scholar]
- Bao, H.; Wan, P. The Impact of Building Inspection Reports on Residential Property Values: Evidence from Hong Kong. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2019, 23, 325–338. [Google Scholar]
- Dubois, D.; Prade, H. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Zadeh, L.A. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1973, SMC-3, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.X. A Course in Fuzzy Systems and Control; Prentice-Hall PTR: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, Y.; Qin, H. Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Yager, R.R.; Zadeh, L.A. (Eds.) An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmermann, H.J. Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Agrawal, R.; Srikant, R. Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), Santiago de Chile, Chile, 12–15 September 1994; pp. 487–499. [Google Scholar]
- Han, J.; Pei, J.; Yin, Y. Mining Frequent Patterns without Candidate Generation. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 2000, 29, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, P.N.; Steinbach, M.; Kumar, V. Introduction to Data Mining; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Borgelt, C. An Implementation of the FP-Growth Algorithm. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Open Source Data Mining: Frequent Pattern Mining Implementations (OSDM), Chicago, IL, USA, 21 August 2005; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B.; Hsu, W. Post-analysis of Learned Rules. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), San Francisco, CA, USA, 26–29 August 2001; pp. 273–276. [Google Scholar]
- Witten, I.H.; Frank, E.; Hall, M.A.; Pal, C.J. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 4th ed.; Morgan Kaufmann: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Bolstad, P.V. GIS Fundamentals: A First Text on Geographic Information Systems; Eider Press: Ashland, OH, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Burrough, P.A.; McDonnell, R.A. Principles of Geographic Information Systems; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Aronoff, S. Remote Sensing for GIS Managers; Esri Press: Ashland, OH, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kemp, K.K.; Peterson, M.N.; Ponds, P. (Eds.) Spatial Planning and Resilience: Revisiting Traditional Knowledge; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Pedro, J.A.C.B.d.O.; de Paiva, J.A.V.; Vilhena, A.J.D.S.M. Portuguese method for building condition assessment. Struct. Surv. 2008, 26, 322–335. [Google Scholar]
- Vilhena, A.; Pedro, J.B.; de Brito, J. Comparison of Methods Used in European Countries to Assess Buildings’ Condition. In Proceedings of the XII DBMC, International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, Porto, Portugal, 12–15 April 2011; Available online: https://dspace.uevora.pt/rdpc/bitstream/10174/4771/1/5.10.pdf (accessed on 9 June 2019).
- Gilliland, M. The Business Forecasting Deal: Exposing Myths, Eliminating Bad Practices, Providing Practical Solutions; SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aspect | Latvia | Brazil |
---|---|---|
Population size | ~1.9 million | ~214 million |
Territorial area | ~64,589 km2 | ~8.5 million km2 |
Housing demand | Stable with moderate growth | High with large regional variations |
Economic context | Stable economy, strongly influenced by EU policies, with controlled inflation and moderate economic growth. | High economic volatility, frequent inflation, income inequality, and complex socioeconomic challenges. |
Annual transaction | Relatively low | Very high in large cities |
Growth factors | Internal migration or urban modernization | Urbanization, expansion of the middle class, government programs (e.g., “Minha Casa Minha Vida”) |
Real estate market maturity/size | Mature market, with structured legal and regulatory frameworks aligned with EU directives. Small and focused on urban areas like Riga and Jelgava. | Developing market, characterized by rapid urbanization and inconsistent regulatory oversight. Extensive and diverse with major centers, like São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Brasilia, and coastal regions. |
Housing supply and demand | Limited supply in urban areas, with high demand due to rising living standards and EU-related migration patterns. | A significant housing deficit, especially in urban centers, with government initiatives to increase the affordable housing supply. |
Construction standards | High construction standards influenced by EU regulations, with emphasis on energy efficiency and sustainability. | Varying construction standards, with newer developments adhering to modern codes, but older buildings often suffer from maintenance issues. |
Property valuation methods | Predominantly market-driven and influenced by EU transparency and standardization regulations. | Valuation methods are more variable, with a mix of market-driven assessments and state subsidies affecting pricing in certain regions. |
Building lifespan | Many buildings, especially Soviet-era constructions, are nearing the ends of their service lives, requiring frequent inspections and repairs. | Buildings vary widely in quality; newer constructions meet higher standards, while older ones require substantial maintenance or renovation. |
External investment | Moderate | High, with growing interest from foreign investors |
External investment | Strong foreign investment, particularly from EU countries, driven by stability and consistent legal frameworks. | Foreign investment fluctuates, influenced by Brazil’s economic instability, currency depreciation, and political uncertainty. |
Urbanization patterns | Urbanization has plateaued, with Riga being the primary hub; slower growth in other cities. | Rapid urbanization, especially in cities like São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, leading to infrastructural challenges and housing shortages. |
Government initiatives | EU-backed programs focused on energy efficiency, sustainable development, and housing affordability. | Government initiatives like Minha Casa, Minha Vida aimed at reducing the housing deficit, though often constrained by economic challenges. |
Market trends | A steady rise in property values, particularly in urban areas, though moderated by EU market regulations. | Fluctuations in property values, influenced by inflation, interest rates, and political instability. |
Financing options | Competitive mortgage markets with low interest rates due to EU monetary policies and banking regulations. | Higher interest rates and more restricted mortgage access, especially for low-income groups. |
Cultural influences | Emphasis on stability and home ownership as a cultural value, encouraged by a tradition of secure investment in property. | Home ownership is viewed as a symbol of social status, with diverse cultural influences shaping the approach to property ownership. |
Building | Weight | |
---|---|---|
1 | Structure | 6 |
2 | Coverage/roof | 5 |
3 | Facade elements | 3 |
Other common parts of the building | Weight | |
4 | Walls | 3 |
5 | Floor coverings | 2 |
6 | Ceiling | 2 |
7 | Stairs | 3 |
8 | Windows and doors | 2 |
9 | Fall protection devices | 3 |
10 | Water supply system | 1 |
11 | Sanitary drainage system | 1 |
12 | Gas distribution system | 1 |
13 | Electrical and lighting systems | 1 |
14 | Telecommunications and security systems | 1 |
15 | Elevator systems | 3 |
16 | Fire protection systems | 1 |
17 | Waste disposal facility/household waste/garbage disposal | 1 |
Flat/Apartment | Weight | |
18 | External walls | 5 |
19 | Interior walls and partitions | 3 |
20 | Exterior floor finishes | 2 |
21 | Interior floor finishes | 4 |
22 | Ceiling finish | 4 |
23 | Internal staircase | 4 |
24 | External windows and doors | 5 |
25 | Internal windows and doors | 3 |
26 | Window safety devices | 2 |
27 | Fall protection (upper story guardrails/balustrades) | 4 |
28 | Sanitary fixtures | 3 |
29 | Kitchen fixtures | 3 |
30 | Water supply installations/and sanitary installations | 3 |
31 | Wastewater disposal system | 3 |
32 | Gas supply installation | 3 |
33 | Electrical system | 3 |
34 | Communication and security systems | 1 |
35 | Ventilation system | 2 |
36 | Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems | 2 |
37 | Fire protection system | 2 |
Too Low (Excellent) | Low (Good) | Medium (Average) | Critical (Bad) | Very Critical (Terrible) |
---|---|---|---|---|
5.00 ≥ IA ≥ 4.50 | 4.50 > IA ≥ 3.50 | 3.50 > IA ≥ 2.50 | 2.50 > IA ≥ 1.50 | 1.50 > IA ≥ 1.00 |
Input (Variable) | Output (Price) EUR | ||
---|---|---|---|
Index: consv_ap | Area (m2) | Index: consv_build | |
1.50 | 48.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
3.10 | 38.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.40 | 44.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.70 | 30.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
1.20 | 23.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.70 | 46.10 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
4.30 | 62.00 | 3.00 | 693.26 |
1.50 | 52.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
3.80 | 43.00 | 3.00 | 737.32 |
3.20 | 52.40 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
3.61 | 42.00 | 3.00 | 623.87 |
3.65 | 33.00 | 3.00 | 660.05 |
3.70 | 40.30 | 3.00 | 693.26 |
3.20 | 48.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
1.30 | 55.40 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.60 | 56.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.50 | 36.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
3.30 | 48.30 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
4.70 | 61.00 | 2.00 | 887.31 |
4.30 | 83.30 | 3.00 | 693.26 |
4.31 | 56.00 | 3.00 | 687.42 |
4.34 | 58.00 | 3.00 | 667.58 |
3.20 | 40.40 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
1.80 | 54.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
4.80 | 41.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.80 | 46.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
3.20 | 30.01 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.58 | 40.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
4.20 | 84.00 | 3.00 | 737.32 |
3.90 | 48.02 | 2.00 | 887.31 |
2.60 | 69.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.52 | 31.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
3.60 | 42.18 | 2.00 | 887.31 |
3.68 | 58.01 | 2.00 | 887.31 |
3.30 | 58.02 | 2.00 | 881.03 |
3.87 | 41.00 | 2.00 | 887.31 |
4.30 | 68.70 | 2.00 | 887.31 |
4.40 | 30.02 | 2.00 | 887.31 |
4.50 | 63.00 | 1.00 | 600.00 |
4.30 | 92.00 | 1.00 | 879.95 |
4.20 | 54.01 | 1.00 | 882.42 |
4.10 | 66.00 | 3.00 | 765.63 |
4.00 | 33.01 | 3.00 | 785.70 |
4.00 | 48.03 | 3.00 | 785.70 |
2.60 | 52.01 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
3.60 | 52.02 | 3.00 | 612.90 |
2.80 | 50.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
2.70 | 28.00 | 3.00 | 416.67 |
Latvian (https://arcoreal.lv) (EUR m−2) | The Real Estate Market Practices Random Reduction without Scientific Research as Support (15% or Even 20% Off in EUR m−2) | With Scientific Research as Support (Fuzzy Logic Plus Inspection) (EUR m−2) |
---|---|---|
525 | 446.25 or even 420.00 | 416.67 |
Characteristic | Traditional Method | Fuzzy Logic Method (Physical-Condition-Based) |
---|---|---|
Strategy | Relies on inferential statistical analysis. | Uses a computational algorithm and fuzzy logic. |
Data handling | Focuses on statistical techniques and numerical data. | Uses linguistic terms and rules based on human behavior. |
Technical assessments | Limited incorporation of civil engineering inspections. | Integrates civil engineering inspections for more accurate valuations |
Insights into property conditions | Primarily focuses on numerical data. | Provides detailed insights into physical anomalies, informing policy decisions and sustainable improvements. |
Prediction | May be affected by multicollinearity. | Avoids multicollinearity, ensuring accurate predictions. |
Behavior of predicted values | Statistical methods may miss nuances. | Fuzzy model ensures proportional and consistent predictions. |
Consistency in data processing | Depends on statistical methods’ reliability. | Processes data consistently across groups. |
Adherence to standards | Follows widely accepted statistical standards. | Aligns with international predictive tool standards. |
Integration of subjective elements | Limited consideration of subjectivity. | Emphasizes the integration of subjective factors in assessments. |
Criteria | Fuzzy-Logic-Based Property Appraisal | Traditional Property Appraisal |
---|---|---|
Nature of data | Scattered data deal with imprecise, vague, and uncertain data (e.g., property conditions, neighborhood quality, building status, etc.). | Relies on accurate and detailed data, such as property sizes, locations, and recent sales. |
Methodology | Uses fuzzy set theory, which allows for degrees of truth rather than binary (true/false) evaluations. | Deterministic models are based on established formulas and have clear input–output relationships. |
Handling of subjectivity | Effectively incorporates subjective judgments (e.g., “good neighborhood” or “poor condition”) through diverse linguistic variables. | Struggles may arise in heterogeneous or volatile markets, where conditions change frequently and unpredictably. |
Adaptability to complex markets | More adaptable to complex and uncertain market conditions, especially when precise data are unavailable. | Struggles in heterogeneous or volatile markets where conditions change frequently and unpredictably. |
Calculation complexity | More complex tasks may require designing membership functions and fuzzy rules, which can be computationally intensive. | Embraces the simplicity, wide usage, and ease of understanding; this solution is not computationally complex. |
Accuracy and precision | Provides a more detailed and adaptable method, enhancing precision in uncertain or ambiguous situations. | High accuracy is achievable in stable and well-understood markets, especially when good data are available. |
Transparency | Understanding fuzzy logic might seem challenging for laypeople at first because it relies on subjective reasoning. However, using algorithms to generate association rules simplifies and speeds up the fuzzy logic process, ultimately delivering effective results. | “Transparent and easy to interpret because it follows clear, predefined models”. |
Scalability | At first, it is less easily scalable due to the complexity of designing and maintaining fuzzy rules and membership functions. However, using association rules from the Apriori algorithm makes it easy. | Easily scalable and applicable to large datasets; suitable for mass-appraisal methods. |
Error sensitivity | Fuzzy logic is more robust to errors from uncertainty or missing data, as it handles degrees of variability and avoids issues like multicollinearity. | Errors may occur when inputs are incomplete, inconsistent, or when subjective factors play a significant role. |
Applicability | Best suited for heterogeneous or emerging markets where qualitative factors and subjectivity play a greater role in the decision. | This is most suitable for uniform markets with distinct, measurable variables and data. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Surgelas, V.; Puķīte, V.; Arhipova, I. Property Valuation in Latvia and Brazil: A Multifaceted Approach Integrating Algorithm, Geographic Information System, Fuzzy Logic, and Civil Engineering Insights. Real Estate 2024, 1, 229-251. https://doi.org/10.3390/realestate1030012
Surgelas V, Puķīte V, Arhipova I. Property Valuation in Latvia and Brazil: A Multifaceted Approach Integrating Algorithm, Geographic Information System, Fuzzy Logic, and Civil Engineering Insights. Real Estate. 2024; 1(3):229-251. https://doi.org/10.3390/realestate1030012
Chicago/Turabian StyleSurgelas, Vladimir, Vivita Puķīte, and Irina Arhipova. 2024. "Property Valuation in Latvia and Brazil: A Multifaceted Approach Integrating Algorithm, Geographic Information System, Fuzzy Logic, and Civil Engineering Insights" Real Estate 1, no. 3: 229-251. https://doi.org/10.3390/realestate1030012
APA StyleSurgelas, V., Puķīte, V., & Arhipova, I. (2024). Property Valuation in Latvia and Brazil: A Multifaceted Approach Integrating Algorithm, Geographic Information System, Fuzzy Logic, and Civil Engineering Insights. Real Estate, 1(3), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.3390/realestate1030012