Next Article in Journal
Correction: Kamiya et al. Non-Destructive Estimation of Paper Fiber Using Macro Images: A Comparative Evaluation of Network Architectures and Patch Sizes for Patch-Based Classification. NDT 2024, 2, 487–503
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrated GPR and Electrochemical Methods for Monitoring Steel Rebar Corrosion in Reinforced Structure
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Non-Destructive Testing Techniques for Conveyor Belt Damage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Precision Weed Control Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Robots: Assessing Feasibility, Bottlenecks, and Recommendations for Scaling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Addressing Non-Uniqueness in Guided Wave Tomography for Limited-View Corrosion Mapping

1
Acoustic Sensor and Sonar Systems, Department of Acoustic & Underwater Warfare, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 2597 AK Den Haag, The Netherlands
2
Royal Netherlands Aerospace Centre (NLR), 8316 PR Marknesse, The Netherlands
3
Laboratory of Medical Imaging, Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 31 October 2025 / Revised: 14 December 2025 / Accepted: 18 December 2025 / Published: 21 December 2025

Abstract

Guided wave tomography has proven to be an effective method for detecting pipeline corrosion, providing both location and quantitive estimates of wall thickness loss. However, the limited view geometry of source–receiver pairs on pipes leads to a significantly ill-posed problem. In practical terms, this means that the wall thickness measurements become unreliable, as small errors or noise in the data can result in large inaccuracies in the reconstructed thickness profile. To address the non-uniqueness inherent in Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) for guided wave tomography, we explore a joint inversion framework that combines multiple guided wave modes: specifically A0, S0, and SH1. These modes have different sensitivities to wall thickness variations in pipelines, and by jointly inverting them, we aim to enhance the overall information content available to the inversion process. By deriving statistical measures of solution precision and accuracy through sampling-based analysis, we quantify the reliability of inversion outcomes under different mode-frequency configurations. These measures offer practical guidance for selecting suitable combinations in future experiments, helping to mitigate non-uniqueness without altering the sensor layout. This insight supports more informed system design choices for corrosion monitoring applications.
Keywords: corrosion monitoring; limited-view tomography; non-uniqueness corrosion monitoring; limited-view tomography; non-uniqueness

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassefras, E.; Volker, A.; Verweij, M. Addressing Non-Uniqueness in Guided Wave Tomography for Limited-View Corrosion Mapping. NDT 2026, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ndt4010001

AMA Style

Hassefras E, Volker A, Verweij M. Addressing Non-Uniqueness in Guided Wave Tomography for Limited-View Corrosion Mapping. NDT. 2026; 4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ndt4010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassefras, Emiel, Arno Volker, and Martin Verweij. 2026. "Addressing Non-Uniqueness in Guided Wave Tomography for Limited-View Corrosion Mapping" NDT 4, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ndt4010001

APA Style

Hassefras, E., Volker, A., & Verweij, M. (2026). Addressing Non-Uniqueness in Guided Wave Tomography for Limited-View Corrosion Mapping. NDT, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ndt4010001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop