Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) Conference 2023: Early-Career Investigators’ Abstracts
Abstract
: 1. Interleukin 1 Receptor Type I and II Variation in Patients with Gout and
Hyperuricemic Individuals
- Orsolya I. Gaal 1,2, Valentin Nica 1, Medeea Badii 1,2, Georgiana Cabău 1, Ioana Hotea 3, HINT Consortium, Cristina Pamfil 3, Megan Leask 4, Tony R. Merriman 4,5, Tania O. Crișan 1,2 and Leo A.B. Joosten 1,2
- 1
- Department of Medical Genetics, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- 2
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands
- 3
- Department of Rheumatology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- 4
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- 5
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
- *
- Correspondence: orsigaal92@gmail.com
2. Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) Urate Volume Predicts Fulfillment of Gout Remission after Two Years of Intensive Urate-Lowering Therapy
- Dansoa Tabi 1,*, Sarah Stewart 1,2, Greg Gamble 1, Anthony J. Doyle 1, Chang-Nam Son 1, Kieran Latto 1, Lisa K. Stamp 3, William J. Taylor 4, Anne Horne 1 and Nicola Dalbeth 1
- 1
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
- 2
- School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
- 3
- Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
- 4
- Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington 6242, New Zealand
- *
- Correspondence: dansoa.tabi-amponsah@auckland.ac.nz
3. Automated Classification of Raman Spectra for an Objective Diagnosis of Crystal Arthropathies
- Tom Niessenk 1,*, Tim L. Jansen 2, Matthijs Janssen 2 and Cees Otto 1
- 1
- Medical Cell Biophysics Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522NB Enschede, The Netherlands
- 2
- Department of Rheumatology, VieCuri Medical Center, 5801CE Venray, The Netherlands
- *
- Correspondence: t.niessink@utwente.n1
- Neogi, T.; Jansen, T.L.T.A.; Dalbeth, N.; Fransen, J.; Schumacher, H.R.; Berendsen, D.; Brown, M.; Choi, H.; Edwards, N.L.; Janssens, H.J.E.M.; et al. 2015 Gout Classification Criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiatve. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015, 67, 2557–2568.
- Abhishek, A.; Tedeschi, S.; Pascart, T.; Latourte, A.; Dalbeth, N.; Neogi, T.; Fuller, A.; Rosenthal, A.; Becce, F.; Bardin, T.; et al., The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2023, 82, 1248–1257.
MSU Identified with Automated Classifier | CPP Identified with Automated Classifier | Negative with Automated Classifier | |
---|---|---|---|
Gout according to criteria set | 11 | 0 | 2 |
CPPD according to criteria set | 0 | 6 | 1 |
Negative in both sets | 0 | 0 | 28 |
Gout | CPPD | Combined | |
Sensitivity | 84.6% (CI 54.4–98.8) | 85.71% (CI 42.1–99.6) | 85.00% (CI 62.1–96.8) |
Specificity | 100% (CI 90.0–100) | 100% (CI 91.4–100) | 100% (CI 92.0–100) |
Accuracy | 95.83 (CI 85.8–99.5) | 97.92% (CI 88.9–100) | 93.75% (CI 82.8–98.7) |
PPV | 100% (CI 71.5–100) | 100% (CI 54.1–100) | 100% (CI 80.5–100) |
NPV | 94.59% (CI 81.8–99.3) | 97.62% (CI 87.4–99.9) | 90.32% (CI 74.3–98.0) |
Kappa | 0.89 (near perfect) | 0.91 (near perfect) | 0.86 (near perfect) |
4. In-Hospital Treatment, Secondary Prevention and Mortality after First-Ever Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Gout
- Panagiota Drivelegka*, Lennart Jacobsson, Tatiana Zverkova-Sandström, Mats Dehlin
- Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
- * Correspondence: panagiota.drivelegka@vgregion.se
- Drivelegka, P.; Jacobsson, L.T.H.; Lindström, U.; Bengtsson, K.; Dehlin, M. Incident Gout and Risk of First-Time Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective, Population-Based Cohort Study in Sweden. Arthritis Care Res. 2023, 75, 1292–1299.
Gout Cases N = 1000 | Controls § N = 4740 | p-Value | OR * (95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Men, N (%) | 727 (72.7) | 3485 (73.5) | 0.5925 | |
Age, mean (SD), years | 70.0 (11.6) | 71.5 (11.3) | 0.0001 | |
Comorbidities, N (%) | ||||
CHD | 284 (28.4) | 978 (20.6) | <0.0001 | 1.5 (1.3–1.7) |
Hypertension | 823 (82.3) | 2661 (56.1) | <0.0001 | 3.6 (3.1–4.3) |
Diabetes | 309 (30.9) | 857 (18.1) | <0.0001 | 2.0 (1.7–2.3) |
Obesity | 271 (27.1) | 793 (16.7) | <0.0001 | 2.0 (1.7–2.3) |
Hyperlipidemia | 404 (40.4) | 1271 (26.8) | <0.0001 | 1.9 (1.6–2.1) |
Renal disease | 225 (22.5) | 405 (8.5) | <0.0001 | 3.1 (2.6–3.7) |
Heart failure | 207 (20.7) | 406 (8.6) | <0.0001 | 2.7 (2.2–3.3) |
Cardiomyopathy | 12 (1.2) | 24 (0.5) | 0.01 | 2.4 (1.2–4.9) |
Atrial fibrillation | 212 (21.2) | 466 (9.8) | <0.0001 | 2.4 (2.0–2.9) |
Smoking | 185 (18.5) | 1017 (21.5) | 0.03 | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) |
Alcoholism | 47 (4.7) | 93 (2.0) | <0.0001 | 2.7 (1.9–3.9) |
Cerebrovascular disease | 205 (20.5) | 598 (12.6) | <0.0001 | 1.7 (1.4–2.0) |
Thromboembolic disease | 19 (1.9) | 70 (1.5) | 0.33 | 1.2 (0.7–2.1) |
Malignancy | 95 (9.5) | 366 (7.7) | 0.06 | 1.2 (1.0–1.6) |
Atherosclerotic disease | 113 (11.3) | 252 (5.3) | <0.0001 | 2.2 (1.7–2.7) |
Medication, N (%) | ||||
CVD drugs ¤ | 733 (73.3) | 2323 (49.0) | <0.0001 | 2.9 (2.5–3.3) |
Anticoagulants | 462 (46.2) | 1408 (29.7) | <0.0001 | 2.0 (1.7–2.3) |
Allopurinol | 350 (35.0) | 32 (0.7) | <0.0001 | 78.5 (54.2–113.8) |
Colchicine | 3 (0.3) | 5 (0.1) | 0.13 | 3.2 (0.8–13.3) |
Cortisone | 149 (14.9) | 259 (5.5) | <0.0001 | 2.9 (2.4–3.7) |
Gout Cases N = 1000 | Controls § N = 4740 | p-Value | OR * (95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
In-hospital treatment, N (%) | ||||
Beta blockers iv | 107 (10.7) | 449 (9.5) | 0.23 | 1.2 (0.9–1.4) |
Diuretics iv | 232 (23.2) | 824 (17.4) | <0.0001 | 1.4 (1.2–1.6) |
Anticoagulants iv | 657 (65.7) | 3116 (65.7) | 0.98 | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) |
Inotropes iv | 43 (4.3) | 159 (3.4) | 0.14 | 1.3 (0.9–1.8) |
Nitrates iv | 91 (9.1) | 394 (8.3) | 0.42 | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) |
Coronary angiography | 726 (72.6) | 3734 (78.8) | <0.0001 | 0.8 (0.7–0.9) |
Any primary reperfusion | 238 (23.8) | 1459 (30.8) | <0.0001 | 0.7 (0.6–0.7) |
PCI | 231 (23.1) | 1408 (29.7) | <0.0001 | 0.7 (0.6–0.9) |
Acute CABG | 3 (0.3) | 13 (0.3) | 0.89 | 1.2 (0.3–4.0) |
CPAP | 69 (6.9) | 190 (4.0) | 0.0001 | 1.7 (1.3–2.3) |
PM/ICD | 19 (1.9) | 53 (1.1) | 0.04 | 1.7 (1.0–2.8) |
Medication at discharge, N (%) | ||||
RAAS inhibitors | 709 (70.9) | 3311 (69.9) | 0.51 | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) |
Beta blockers | 838 (83.8) | 4064 (85.7) | 0.11 | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) |
Antiplatelets | 938 (93.8) | 4509 (95.1) | 0.08 | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) |
Calcium antagonists | 217 (21.7) | 643 (13.6) | <0.0001 | 1.7 (1.5–2.1) |
Digitalis | 40 (4.0) | 81 (1.7) | <0.0001 | 2.2 (1.5–3.3) |
Diuretics | 399 (39.9) | 1079 (22.8) | <0.0001 | 2.2 (1.9–2.6) |
Nitrates | 185 (18.5) | 609 (12.8) | <0.0001 | 1.5 (1.2–1.8) |
Statins | 771 (77.1) | 3963 (83.6) | <0.0001 | 0.7 (0.6–0.9) |
5. Using a New Engineering Method, Single-Shot Computational Polarized Light Microscopy (SCPLM), in Identifying Crystals in Synovial Fluid
- Chesca Barrios 1,*, Ann Rosenthal 2, Geraldine McCarthy 3, Tairan Liu 1, Bijie Bai 1, Guangdong Ma 1, Aydagan Ozcan 1 and John D. Fitzgerald 1
- 1
- Department of Rheumatology, University of California, Los Angeles, 90230 CA, USA
- 2
- UCD Health Sciences Center, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
- 3
- Medical College of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 53226 WI, USA
- *
- Correspondence: chesca.12@gmail.com
- Bai, B.; Wang, H.; Liu, T.; Rivenson, Y.; FitzGerald, J.; Ozcan, A. Pathological crystal imaging with single-shot computational polarized light microscopy. J. Biophotonics 2020, 13, e201960036.
CPP (n = 280 crystals) | |||||||||
SCPLM | CPLM | ||||||||
R1 R2 | Certain | Possible | Negative | R1 R2 | Certain | Possible | Negative | ||
Certain | 89 | 30 | 90 | 209 | Certain | 44 | 1 | 69 | 114 |
Possible | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | Possible | 1 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Negative | 16 | 2 | 18 | Negative | 10 | 6 | 16 | ||
108 | 35 | 96 | 239 | 55 | 7 | 76 | 138 | ||
MSU (n = 87 crystals) | |||||||||
SCPLM | CPLM | ||||||||
R1 R2 | Certain | Possible | Negative | R1 R2 | Certain | Possible | Negative | ||
Certain | 58 | 5 | 13 | 76 | Certain | 33 | 1 | 12 | 46 |
Possible | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | Possible | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Negative | 6 | 1 | 7 | Negative | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||
64 | 6 | 16 | 86 | 35 | 1 | 12 | 48 |
SCPLM | CPLM | CPP (n = 144) | MSU (n = 69) |
---|---|---|---|
++ | ++ | 20% | 42% |
++ | Other | 60% | 48% |
Other | ++ | 20% | 9% |
6. Skeletal Muscle Mass and Quality in Gout Patients Versus Non-Gout Controls: A Computed Tomography Imaging Study
- Alysson Covello 1,*, Michael Toprover 1,2*, Cheongeun Oh 3, Gregoire Leroy 4, Ada Kumar 5, Brian LaMoreaux 5, Michael Mechlin 6, Theodore R. Fields 7, Michael H. Pillinger 1,2,# and Fabio Becce 4
- 1
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- 2
- Rheumatology Section, NY Harbor Health Care System New York Campus, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, New York, NY 10010, USA
- 3
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- 4
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1011, Switzerland
- 5
- Horizon Therapeutics, Deerfield, IL 60015, USA
- 6
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- 7
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA
- *
- Correspondence: alison.covello@nyulangone.org
- Bennett, J.L.; Pratt, A.G.; Dodds, R.; Sayer, A.A.; Isaacs, J.D. Rheumatoid sarcopenia: loss of skeletal muscle strength and mass in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2023, 19, 239–251.
- An, H.J.; Tizaoui, K.; Terrazzino, S.; Cargnin, S.; Lee, K.H.; Nam, S.W.; Kim, J.S.; Yang, J.W.; Lee, J.Y.; Smith, L.; et al. Sarcopenia in Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5678.
7. An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled
Trials on the Initiation of Urate-Lowering Therapy during a Gout Flare
- Vicky Tai 1,*, Peter Gow 2, Sarah Stewart 1,3, Abhishek Abhishek 4, Nicola Dalbeth 1
- 1
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, 1023 Auckland, New Zealand
- 2
- Middlemore Hospital, 2025 Auckland, New Zealand
- 3
- School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, 1010 Auckland, New Zealand
- 4
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2QL, UK
- *
- Correspondence: vtai282@aucklanduni.ac.nz
8. Sex-Specific Differences in Cytokine Levels in Patients with Gout Compared to Controls
- Medeea Badii 1,2,*, Orsolya Gaal 1,2, Georgina Cabǎu 1, Ioana Hotea 3, Valentin Nica 1,Andreea M. Mirea 3, HINT Consortium, Cristina Pamfil 4, Simona Rednic 4, Radu A. Popp 1,Tania O. Crişan 1,2 and Leo A.B. Joosten 1,2
- 1
- Department of Medical Genetics, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
- 2
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands
- 3
- Department of Genetics, Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- 4
- Department of Rheumatology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- *
- Correspondence: medeea.badii@gmail.com
9. Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Outpatient Follow-Up after an Emergency
Department Visit for Acute Gout Flare
- Elizabeth Lopez 1,*, Lesley E. Jackson 2, Gary Cutter 3, John D. Osborne 4, James Booth 5,Kenneth G. Saag 2 and Maria I. Danila 2,6
- 1
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- 2
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- 3
- School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- 4
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- 5
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- 6
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
- *
- Correspondence: lopeze@uab.edu
10. Clustering of Gout-Related Comorbidities and Their Relationship with Gout Flares: A Data-Driven Cluster Analysis of Eight Comorbidities
- Shuang Lui *, Hang Sun, Shen Qu, Haibing Chen
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
- * Correspondence: liushuang08@126.com
11. Sex Ratios in Gout
- Nicholas Sumpter *, Tony R. Merriman
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- * Correspondence: nicholassumpter@uabmc.edu
12. Why 6.8?
- Nicholas Sumpter *, Mariana Urquiaga, Riku Takei, Angelo Gaffo, Tony R. Merriman
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- * Correspondence: nicholassumpter@uabmc.edu
13. Adherence to the Gout and Crystal Arthritis Network (G-CAN) Consensus
Statements for Gout Nomenclature
- Ellen Prendergast 1,*, Nicola Dalbeth 2, David Bursill 3, Chris Frampton 4 and Lisa K. Stamp 4
- 1
- Te Whatu Ora Waitaha, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
- 2
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
- 3
- Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
- 4
- The Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
- *
- Correspondence: ellen.c.prendergast@gmail.com
14. Could the Extent of CPP Deposition Provide Novel Insights in the Pathogenetic Mechanisms of CPPD? Preliminary Results of an Ultrasound Study
- Silvia Sirotti * and Georgios Filippou
- Rheumatology Department, IRCCS Galeazzi–Sant’Ambrogio Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy
- * Correspondence: silvia.sirotti@gmail.com
15. Histological Characterization of Menisci in Patients with Osteoarthritis and
Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition (CPPD)
- Silvia Sirotti 1,*, Paola Maroni 2, Giovanni Lombardi 2,3, Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini 1 andGeorgios Filippou 1
- 1
- Rheumatology Department, IRCCS Galeazzi–Sant’Ambrogio Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy
- 2
- Laboratory of Experimental Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, IRCCS Galeazzi–Sant’Ambrogio Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy
- 3
- Department of Athletics, Strength and Conditioning, Poznań University of Physical Education,61-871 Poznań, Poland
- *
- Correspondence: silvia.sirotti@gmail.com
16. The Impact of the 2011 EULAR Recommendations for the Nomenclature of CPPD in the Terminology Used in the Literature
- Silvia Sirotti 1,*, Charlotte Jauffret 2, Antonella Adinolfi 3, Edoardo Cipolletta 4, Daniele Cirillo 1, Luca Ingrao 1, Alessandro Lucia 1, Debora Pireddu 1, Emilio Filippucci 4, Tristan Pascart 2,Sara K. Tedeschi 5, Robert Terkeltaub 7, Nicola Dalbeth 7 and Georgios Filippou 1
- 1
- Rheumatology Department, IRCCS Galeazzi–Sant’Ambrogio Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy
- 2
- Department of Rheumatology, Saint-Philibert Hospital, Lille Catholic University, 59160 Lille, France
- 3
- Rheumatology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy
- 4
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
- 5
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- 6
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, University of California, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
- 7
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
- *
- Correspondence: silvia.sirotti@gmail.com
17. Peripheral Arterial Disease and Sequelae in Individuals with Gout, Diabetes, or Both: A US Veterans Population-Based Study
- Nicole Leung *, Michael Toprover, Charles Fang, Michael H. Pillinger, Craig Tenner andJay Pendse
- Division of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10003, USA
- * Correspondence: nicole.leung@nyulangone.org
18. Gout: A Gateway to Chronic Opioid Use?
- Lindsay Helget 1,*, Bryant R. England 1, Punyasha Roul 1, Harlan Sayles 1, Tuhina Neogi 2,James R. O’Dell 1 and Ted R. Mikuls 1
- 1
- Nebraska Medical Centre, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
- 2
- Boston Medical Center, Boston University, MA 02118, USA
- *
- Correspondence: lindsay.helget@unmc.edu
19. Genetic Colocalization of Gout with Plasma and Urine Metabolites
- Riku Takei1,*, Nicholas A. Sumpter, Megan P. Leask, Tony R. Merriman
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States
- * Correspondence: rikutakei@uabmc.edu
- Yin, X.; Chan, L.S.; Bose, D.; Jackson, A.U.; VandeHaar, P.; Locke, A.E.; Fuchsberger, C.; Stringham, H.M.; Welch, R.; Yu, K.; et al. Genome-wide association studies of metabolites in Finnish men identify disease-relevant loci. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1644.
- Major, T.J.; Takei, R.; Matsuo, H.; Leask, M.P.; Topless, R.K.; Shirai, Y.; Li, Z.; Ji, A.; Cadzow, M.J.; Sumpter, N.A.; et al. A genome-wide association analysis of 2,622,830 individuals reveals new pathogenic pathways in gout. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.26.22281768.
- Arts, R.J.W.; Novakovic, B.; ter Horst, R.; Carvalho, A.; Bekkering, S.; Lachmandas, E.; Rodrigues, F.; Silvestre, R.; Cheng, S.C.; Wang, S.Y.; et al. Glutaminolysis and Fumarate Accumulation Integrate Immunometabolic and Epigenetic Programs in Trained Immunity. Cell Metabolism 2016, 24, 807–819.
- Manigat, L.C.; Granade, M.E.; Taori, S.; Miller, C.A.; Vass, L.R.; Zhaong, X.P.; Harris, T.E.; Purow, B.W. Loss of Diacylglycerol Kinase α Enhances Macrophage Responsiveness. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 722469.
20. Evaluation of Early Life Factors and Future Gout: A Prospective Cohort Study
- Gao Yining*, Chen Haibing
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China
- * Correspondence: kokichan@163.com
Preliminary Gout Remission Criteria | Simplified Gout Remission Criteria |
---|---|
Absence of gout flares in the last 12 months | Absence of gout flares in the last 12 months |
Absence of tophi | Absence of tophi |
Serum urate <0.36 mmol/L measured at least twice in the last 12 months, | Serum urate <0.36 mmol/L measured at least twice in the last 12 months |
Pain due to gout <2 at least twice in the last 12 months and no value 2 or more, using a 10-cm visual analogue scale or 10-point Likert scale | |
Patient global assessment <2 at least twice in the last 12 months and no value 2 or more, using a 10-cm visual analogue scale or 10-point Likert scale |
Characteristics | Total, N = 159 | Gout Follow-Up Care, N = 56 | No Gout Follow-Up Care, N = 103 | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age, years, mean (SD) | 54.2 (14.0) | 58.0 (15.4) | 52.2 (12.8) | 0.02 |
Sex, male, N (%) | 120 (75.5) | 41 (73.2) | 79 (76.7) | 0.6 |
Race/Ethnicity, N (%) * Black or African American White Other ** | 113 (72.4) 37 (23.7) 6 (3.8) | 43 (79.6) 10 (18.5) 1 (1.9) | 70 (68.6) 27 (26.5) 5 (4.9) | 0.4 |
Area deprivation index (ADI) ranking, state decile, median (Q 25–Q 75) # | 6.5 (3–9) | 7 (3–9) | 6 (3–9) | 0.7 |
Quartile 1 (least disadvantaged), N(%) | 41 (28.9) | 14 (27.5) | 27 (29.7) | 0.9 |
Quartile 2, N(%) | 30 (21.1) | 10 (19.6) | 20 (22.0) | |
Quartile 3, N(%) | 41 (28.9) | 17 (33.3) | 24 (26.4) | |
Quartile 4 (most disadvantaged), N(%) | 30 (21.1) | 10 (19.6) | 20 (22.0) | |
Area deprivation index (ADI)ranking, national percentile, median (Q 25–Q 75) ## | 84 (58.8–96) | 86 (59–96) | 83 (56–96) | 0.8 |
Quartile 1 (least disadvantaged), N(%) | 35 (24.6) | 12 (23.5) | 23 (25.3) | 0.8 |
Quartile 2, N(%) | 37 (26.1) | 12 (23.5) | 25 (27.5) | |
Quartile 3, N(%) | 40 (28.2) | 17 (33.3) | 23 (25.3) | |
Quartile 4 (most disadvantaged), N(%) | 30 (21.1) | 10 (19.6) | 20 (22.0) | |
Marital Status, N (%) *** | 0.003 | |||
Married | 64 (41.6) | 31 (57.4) | 33 (33.0) | |
Not Married | 90 (58.4) | 23 (42.6) | 67 (67.0) | |
Medication prescribed at ED discharge, N (%) † | ||||
Corticosteroids | 91 (57.2) | 31 (55.4) | 60 (58.3) | 0.7 |
Opioids | 89 (56.0) | 32 (57.1) | 57 (55.3) | 0.8 |
NSAIDs | 66 (41.5) | 27 (48.2) | 39 (37.9) | 0.2 |
Colchicine | 53 (33.3) | 23 (41.1) | 30 (29.1) | 0.1 |
Allopurinol | 16 (10.1) | 7 (12.5) | 9 (8.7) | 0.6 |
Anakinra | 5 (3.1) | 3 (5.4) | 2 (1.9) | 0.3 |
Local injection | 10 (6.3) | 6 (10.7) | 4 (3.9) | 0.2 |
Healthcare Outcome | Gout Follow-Up care, N = 56 | No Gout Follow-Up Care, N = 103 | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Hospitalized, N (%) | 7 (12.5) | 9 (8.7) | 0.5 |
Received Care at Emergency Department or Urgent Care, N (%) | 19 (33.9) | 32 (31.1) | 0.7 |
Outpatient Service Addressing Gout, N (%) | |||
Internal Medicine Subspecialities (including Rheumatology)α | 20 (35.7) | ||
General Internal Medicine | 14 (25.0) | ||
Surgical Subspecialtyβ | 9 (16.1) | ||
Family Medicine | 8 (14.3) | ||
Palliative Care and Geriatrics | 3 (5.4) | ||
Podiatry | 1 (1.8) | ||
Weight Loss Management | 1 (1.8) | ||
Timing of Gout Outpatient Follow-up Visit since ED Visit, N (%) ≤1 month since index ED visit >1 month and ≤3 months since index ED visit >3 months since index ED visit | 40 (71.4) 7 (12.5) 9 (16.1) |
Publication (Author Year PMID) | Definition | N | Sex Ratio (M:F) |
---|---|---|---|
Mikuls 2005 15647434 | Oxford Medical Information Systems code for clinically diagnosed gout | 56,483 | 3.9 |
Harrold 2006 16644784 | Two or more ICD-9 codes for gout and on private insurance | 6133 | 4.3 |
Lawrence 2008 18163497 | Self-reported physician-diagnosed gout | 510 | 2.4 |
Bhole 2010 20131266 | Acute joint pain with swelling and heat lasting up to 2 weeks, followed by complete remission of symptoms Also needed to respond to antigout medications | 304 | 1.9 |
De Vera 2010 20124358 | Two ICD-9 codes at least 1 day apart | 9642 | 1.5 |
Cea Soriano 2011 21371293 | General practitioner diagnosed gout | 24,768 | 2.6 |
Chen 2012 21761146 | Diagnostic code of gout | 18,587 | 1.2 |
Diagnostic code of gout + 2 prescriptions of colchicine | 2930 | 4.5 | |
Diagnostic code of gout + 2 prescriptions of colchicine and ULT | 1606 | 5.1 | |
Diagnostic code of gout + 2 prescriptions of colchicine and ULT, from rheumatologist | 238 | 6.7 | |
Chohan 2012 22052584 | ACR preliminary criteria and SU > 8 mg/dL. Excluded CKD, “secondary HU”, hypersensitivity to ULT | 4101 | 17.1 |
Winnard 2012 22253023 | Hospital discharge ICD gout code or allopurinol/colchicine prescription. Excluded leukemia/lymphoma for allopurinol criteria | 114,318 | 3.0 |
Zhu 2012 22626509 | Self-reported physician-diagnosed gout | 223 | 2.8 |
Sicras-Mainar 2013 23313534 | CIAP-2 code and ICD-9 codes, validated with patient history | 3130 | 4.3 |
Trifirò 2013 22736095 | ICD-9 code for gout (outpatient) | 3069 | 2.9 |
Kinge 2015 25887763 | ICD-10 code or ICPC-2 code for gout (primary care) | 22,983 | 3.2 |
ICD-10 code or ICPC-2 code for gout (specialist) | 2797 | 3.8 | |
Kuo 2015 25612613 | ICD-9 code for gout and gout-specific medication | 1,045,059 | 3.3 |
Richette 2015 24107981 | Physician-diagnosed gout | 2762 | 5.1 |
Robinson 2015 26233513 | Allopurinol, colchicine or gout code, excluding blood cancer | 22,768 | 4.4 |
Wändell 2015 26500085 | Hospital diagnosis of gout | 11,755 | 2.9 |
Dehlin 2016 27412614 | At least one primary or auxiliary diagnosis of gout | 22,243 | 2.3 |
At least one primary diagnosis of gout | 16,833 | 2.6 | |
At least two primary diagnoses of gout or at least one at a rheumatology visit | 6184 | 3.8 | |
Kapetanovic 2016 27933209 | ICD-10 code for gout | 17,094 | 2.5 |
Rho 2016 25277955 | READ code for gout | 35,339 | 2.6 |
Tung 2016 27448491 | ICD-9 code for gout (outpatient or inpatient) at three or more clinic visits with ULT or combination therapy | 29,765 | 4.7 |
Harrold 2017 28292303 | Rheumatologist-diagnosed gout based on 1977 ARA criteria | 1273 | 4.9 |
Kim 2017 28676911 | Primary or secondary gout diagnosis (outpatient or hospital) | 383,471 | 8.6 |
Rai 2017 28040245 | At least one ICD-9/10 primary diagnosis of gout | 171,165 | 2.1 |
Drivelegka 2018 29855389 | ICD-10 code for gout | 14,113 | 2.1 |
At least two ICD-10 codes for gout | 3755 | 2.9 | |
Elfishawi 2018 29247151 | ICD-9 code for gout then either ARA 1977, Rome or New York criteria for gout | 271 | 2.6 |
Kapetanovic 2018 30157929 | ICD-10 code for gout (primary care, inpatient, outpatient) | 1272 | 3.9 |
Chen-Xu 2019 30618180 | Self-reported physician-diagnosed gout | 214 | 1.8 |
Huang 2019 30912848 | ICD-9 code plus antigout medication | 2780 | 1.9 |
Zobbe 2019 30590724 | ICD-10 code for gout | 45,685 | 2.7 |
Te Kampe 2021 32611671 | ACR/EULAR classification criteria, most were crystal-proven | 954 | 4.9 |
Dehlin 2022 35266438 | ICD-10 code for gout (primary or secondary care) | 728 | 4.7 |
Cohort | Definition | N | Sex Ratio (M:F) |
---|---|---|---|
UK Biobank | Self-reported doctor-diagnosed gout (SR) | 7298 | 12.2 |
Inpatient ICD-10 code for gout (CODE) | 5239 | 6.3 | |
Urate lowering therapy prescription excluding lymphoma/leukemia (ULT) | 5806 | 11.5 | |
SR or CODE | 10,160 | 8.2 | |
SR or ULT | 8117 | 11.2 | |
CODE or ULT | 8938 | 7.7 | |
SR or CODE or ULT | 10,697 | 8.0 | |
SR and CODE | 2377 | 13.4 | |
SR and ULT | 4987 | 13.0 | |
CODE and ULT | 2107 | 11.9 | |
SR and CODE and ULT | 1825 | 13.0 | |
All of Us | Self-reported doctor-diagnosed gout (SR) | 4941 | 2.2 |
Any SNOMED code for gout (CODE) | 9012 | 1.9 | |
Urate-lowering therapy prescription excluding lymphoma/leukemia (ULT) | 5913 | 1.9 | |
SR or CODE | 11,971 | 1.9 | |
SR or ULT | 9458 | 1.9 | |
CODE or ULT | 10,871 | 1.7 | |
SR or CODE or ULT | 13,609 | 1.7 | |
SR and CODE | 1982 | 2.9 | |
SR and ULT | 1396 | 3.2 | |
CODE and ULT | 4054 | 2.6 | |
SR and CODE and ULT | 1175 | 3.3 |
Publication (Author Year PMID) | Definition SU > mg/dL | Sex | Justification/Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Popert 1962 14487867 | 6.0 | Both | Upper limit of normal (arbitrarily defined) |
Kellgren 1963 No PMID | 6.0 | Women | Documents the Rome 1961 conference, where the thresholds were originally proposed according to Bardin and Richette (2014) |
7.0 | Men | ||
Mikkelsen 1965 14320691 | 6.0 | Both | They state the arbitrary definitions of hyperuricemia are unrealistically low at five for women and six for men and propose that from a population standpoint, these estimates should be based on the population distribution of urate |
Hall 1967 6016478 | Both | Hyperuricemia is stated as a “term of convenience rather than an accurate definition of a metabolic abnormality” | |
Loeb 1972 5027604 | 6.8 | Equilibrium concentration for urate at 37 degrees in the presence of physiological levels of Na+ (140mM) | |
Wallace 1977 856219 | Mean + 2SD | Both | This was defined for each laboratory, with the highest recorded urate value used for calculation. Mean was supposed to be derived from mean SU for a healthy population, depending on the method used. Note colorimetric gives estimates around 17% higher than the uricase method (Higgens 1983) |
McCarthy 1991 1747133 | Seven patients showed reduced tophi over 10 years with a mean SU of 6.2 in that time, while seven had mean SU of 8.2 and showed increased tophi or unchanged | ||
Smyth 1999 No PMID | 6.0 | Women | Unclear, mainly just opinion of one man who wrote the chapter |
7.0 | Men | ||
Lin 2000 10782835 | 6.0 | Women | Unknown, could not access full text |
7.0 | Men | ||
Chang 2001 11469473 | 6.6 | Women | Conventional criteria (cites Smyth 1999) |
7.7 | Men | ||
6.0 | Women | Unclear, potentially to allow comparison to other studies | |
7.0 | Men | ||
Li-Yu 2001 11296962 | Men | 9 of 16 patients who had SU below 6 mg/dL for several years showed no evidence of crystals in joint, vs 2 of 16 who did not maintain this SU | |
Perez-Ruiz 2002 12209479 | 95% Men | Baseline SU was around 9 mg/dL and was reduced to between 3 and 6 on average, with the greater reductions associated with better improvement in tophus size. It appears that one obtains some reduction even at SU of around 7 mg/dL but it works better at lower concentrations. Note the colorimetric method is probably overestimated urate | |
Becker 2005 16339094 | 6.0 | 95% Men | Primary end point of clinical trial comparing febuxostat to allopurinol, when measured across three monthly visits it was less common than one-off |
8.0 | Entry criteria for clinical trial comparing febuxostat to allopurinol | ||
Zhang 2006 16707532 | 6.0 | Saturation point for monosodium urate; goal of ULT is to promote crystal dissolution and prevent crystal formation; this SU level should be maintained for this to have an effect. Shows plot of effect of ULT at different doses with <6 mg/dL only consistently achieved above 600 mg/day. Claims that studies have shown maintenance below 6 reduces tophus burden and depletes crystal burden in joints (McCarthy 1991, Perez-Ruiz 2002 and Li-Yu 2001) | |
Perez-Ruiz 2007 17907217 | 6.0 | Both | Review article that reiterates most of the papers above, confirming the 6 mg/dL |
Janssens 2010 20625017 | 5.9 | Both | Mean SU was 8.2 mg/dL among those with crystal-proven gout vs 6.05 among those without crystals. Also 89% male in crystal proven vs 62% male in non-crystal proven |
5.7 | Women | Does not state where these came from | |
7.1 | Men | ||
Zhu 2011 21800283 | 5.7 | Women | Based on NHANES-III laboratory definition (cites NHANES-III reference manuals and reports CD-ROM). NHANES-III reference manual states normal range is 3.4 to 7.0 for men and 2.4 to 5.7 for women. These were determined by Boehringer Manneheim Diagnostics (BMD) for their Hitachi 737 instrument |
7.0 | Men | ||
6.0 | Both | Widely accepted therapeutic target (cites Becker 2005, Zhang 2006, Perez-Ruiz 2007) | |
7.0 | Both | Above the supersaturation point | |
Chen 2012 21761146 | 6.6 | Women | No justification (cites Chang 2001) |
7.7 | Men | ||
Matsuo 2014 24441388 | 7.0 | Men | No justification |
Neogi 2015 26359487 | 6, 8, or 10 | Both | Highest value recorded; should be intercritical (>4 weeks after start of episode); should not be on ULT. Below 4mg/dL loses 4 points, 4–6 = 0 points, 6–8 = 2, 8–10 = 3, 10+ = 4 |
Chiou 2020 31074584 | 6.8 | Both | Concentration at which urate precipitates into MSU at a physiologic pH regardless of sex (cites Mikuls 2017 textbook chapter, which itself does not cite anything for this) |
Haeckel 2020 No PMID | Reports reference intervals of up to 10 mg/dL for both men and women; however, this is age and laboratory dependent. Also shows huge dependence on time of day for measurement, with a 2 mg/dL higher peak around 5 am. Be a little cautious interpreting this as the text does not match with the figure | ||
Pálinkás 2022 35939175 | 7.0 | Both | No justification |
Publication (Author Year PMID) | Joint | N | Age Range/Mean | Sex | Joint Range/Mean (SD) | Surface Range/Mean (SD) | Urat Solubility | Condition/Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Horvath 1949 16695699 | Knee | 4 | 32–44 | Men | 31.4–32.8 | 29.6–31.9 | 4.6–5.2 | Healthy |
7 | 48–67 | Women | 33.9–35.3 | 30.0–33.5 | 5.6–6.2 | degenerative arthritis | ||
2 | 21–36 | Men | 31.9–35.6 | 30.8–32.7 | 4.9–6.4 | Reiter’s syndrome/gout | ||
Knee + Elbow | 5 | 18–65 | Both | 35.0–36.2 | 32.8–35.0 | 6.0–6.5 | Severe RA | |
Knee | 4 | 30–61 | Men | 33.6–33.8 | 32.1–33.4 | 5.4–5.5 | Moderate RA | |
4 | 50–71 | Both | 30.0–34.3 | 29.2–33.3 | 4.5–5.8 | Slight/inactive RA | ||
Akerman 1987 3480567 | TMJ | 10 | 29–40 | Both | 35.3–37.0 | 33.9–35.9 | 6.2–6.9 | Healthy |
Weinberger 1989 2711138 | Knee | 35.2 (1.5) | – | 6.1 | ||||
Kim 2002 12402375 | Knee | 20 | 23–68 | Both | 33.9 (1.2) | 31.8 (1.0) | 5.6 | Baseline prior to cold treatment |
Warren 2004 14977671 | Knee | 12 | 26 | Both | 32.5–35.0 | 27.5–32.0 | 5.2–6.0 | Baseline prior to cold treatment |
Sánchez-Inchausti 2005 15891720 | Knee | 30 | 18–72 | Both | 32.2 (0.3) | – | 5.1 | Baseline prior to arthroscopy |
Becher 2008 18405365 | Knee | 6 | 27–32 | Men | 29.7–34.3 | 25.5–28.0 | 4.4–5.8 | Baseline prior to exercise |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Acute CPP crystal arthritis (11 pts) | Right MM | 0 (0%) | 1 (9%) | 5 (45.5%) | 5 (45.5%) |
Left MM | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (63.6%) | 4 (36.4%) | |
Right LM | 1 (9%) | 2 (18%) | 8 (73%) | 0 (0%) | |
Left LM | 0 (0%) | 3 (27.3%) | 8 (73%) | 0 (0%) | |
Right HC | 5 (45.5%) | 1 (9%) | 5 (45.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
Left HC | 3 (27.3%) | 3 (27.3%) | 5 (45.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
Right TFCC | 3 (27.3%) | 1 (9%) | 5 (45.5%) | 2 (18.2%) | |
Left TFCC | 1 (9%) | 3 (27.3%) | 6 (54.5%) | 1 (9%) | |
Chronic CPP crystal inflammatory arthritis (13 pts) | Right MM | 0 (0%) | 3 (23.1%) | 5 (38.5%) | 5 (38.5%) |
Left MM | 2 (15.4%) | 2 (15.4%) | 5 (38.5%) | 4 (30.8%) | |
Right LM | 1 (7.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | 8 (61.5%) | 3 (23.1%) | |
Left LM | 2 (15.4%) | 2 (15.4%) | 7 (53.8%) | 2 (15.4%) | |
Right HC | 6 (46.1%) | 4 (30.8%) | 2 (15.4%) | 1 (7.7%) | |
Left HC | 5 (38.5%) | 3 (23.1%) | 5 (38.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
Right TFCC | 0 (0%) | 3 (23.1%) | 7 (53.8%) | 3 (23.1%) | |
Left TFCC | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (69.2%) | 4 (30.8%) | |
OA with CPPD (4 pts) | Right MM | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (25%) | 3 (75%) |
Left MM | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (25%) | 3 (75%) | |
Right LM | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (75%) | 1 (25%) | |
Left LM | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (75%) | 1 (25%) | |
Right HC | 0 (0%) | 2 (50%) | 2 (50%) | 0 (0%) | |
Left HC | 0 (0%) | 1 (25%) | 3 (75%) | 0 (0%) | |
Right TFCC | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (75%) | 1 (25%) | |
Left TFCC | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Non-Gout (n = 3,608,182) | Gout (n = 419,837) | |
---|---|---|
Patient initiating chronic opioid use, n (%) | 137,497 (3.8) | 28,948 (6.9) |
Patient years (pt-yrs) of follow-up | 14,951,085 | 1,749,357 |
Crude rate (95% CI), per 1000 pt-yrs | 9.2 (9.1–9.2) | 16.5 (16.4–16.7) |
Unadjusted HR (95% CI) | Reference | 1.78 (1.75–1.80) |
Adjusted HR (95% CI) * | Reference | 1.36 (1.34–1.39) |
Controls | Cases | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | N = 481,960 | N = 9075 | |
Age | 56.39 ± 8.1 | 59.52 ± 7.40 | <0.001 |
Gender, n (%) | |||
Female | 269,849 (55.99) | 2141 (23.59) | <0.001 |
Male | 212,111 (44.01) | 6934 (76.41) | |
Ethnicity, n (%) | |||
White | 453,276 (94.05) | 8534 (94.04) | 0.968 |
Non-white | 28,684 (5.95) | 541 (5.96) | |
Education, n (%) | |||
College/University | 156,013 (32.37) | 2259 (24.89) | <0.001 |
Other | 325,947 (67.63) | 6816 (75.11) | |
TDI, mean (SD) | −1.30 (3.09) | −1.08 (3.19) | <0.001 |
Missing | 600 | 13 | |
BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 27.31 (4.76) | 30.13 (5.07) | <0.001 |
Missing | 2954 | 75 | |
Smoking Status, n (%) | |||
Never | 264,709 (55.24) | 3936 (43.74) | <0.001 |
Former | 163,450 (34.11) | 4159 (46.22) | |
Current | 50,999 (10.64) | 904 (10.05) | |
Missing | 2802 | 76 | |
Alcohol Drinking Status, n (%) | |||
Never | 39,309 (8.16) | 638 (7.03) | <0.001 |
Moderate | 290,822 (60.34) | 3918 (43.17) | |
Excessive | 151,829 (31.5) | 4519 (49.80) | |
Diuretics Use, n (%) | |||
No | 471,392 (97.81) | 8246 (90.87) | <0.001 |
Yes | 10,568 (2.19) | 829 (9.13) | |
Urate (umol/L), mean (SD) | 304.97 ± 76.72 | 438.05 ± 86.32 | <0.001 |
Missing | 32,117 | 659 | |
History of Hyperuricemia, n (%) | |||
No | 431,141 (89.46) | 3348 (36.89) | <0.001 |
Yes | 50,819 (10.54) | 5727 (63.11) | |
History of Hypertension, n (%) | |||
No | 203,795 (42.28) | 1761 (19.40) | <0.001 |
Yes | 278,165 (57.72) | 7314 (80.60) | |
History of Diabetes, n (%) | |||
No | 457,653 (94.96) | 8136 (89.65) | <0.001 |
Yes | 24,307 (5.04) | 939 (10.35) | |
History of Hyperlipidemia, n (%) | |||
No | 263,945 (54.76) | 3777 (41.62) | <0.001 |
Yes | 218,015 (45.24) | 5298 (58.38) |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | |
Breastfed as a baby | ||||||
No | Reference | |||||
Yes | 0.94 (0.89–1.00) | 0.068 | 0.96 (0.90–1.03) | 0.239 | 0.94 (0.88–1.01) | 0.084 |
Birthweight (g) | ||||||
Birthweight (per 1-SD increase) | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | <0.001 | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | <0.001 | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.329 |
High (bw ≥ 4000) | 0.95 (0.87–1.03) | 0.228 | 0.95 (0.87–1.04) | 0.251 | 0.96 (0.88–1.06) | 0.436 |
Normal (2500 ≤ bw < 4000) | Reference | |||||
Low (1500 ≤ bw < 2500) | 1.23 (1.10–1.37) | <0.001 | 1.20 (1.08–1.35) | 0.001 | 1.08 (0.96–1.22) | 0.181 |
Very low (1000 ≤ bw < 1500) | 1.46 (1.07–1.98) | 0.016 | 1.42 (1.04–1.92) | 0.026 | 0.99 (0.72–1.37) | 0.963 |
Extremely low (0 < bw < 1000) | 1.42 (0.92–2.18) | 0.112 | 1.35 (0.88–2.08) | 0.170 | 0.85 (0.54–1.34) | 0.478 |
Maternal smoking around birth | ||||||
No | Reference | |||||
Yes | 1.22 (1.16–1.29) | <0.001 | 1.22 (1.16–1.28) | <0.001 | 1.09 (1.03–1.15) | 0.002 |
Comparative height at age 10 | ||||||
About average | Reference | |||||
Shorter | 1.05 (0.99–1.11) | 0.112 | 1.04 (0.98–1.10) | 0.248 | 1.11 (1.04–1.18) | 0.001 |
Taller | 1.00 (0.95–1.06) | 0.983 | 0.98 (0.93–1.03) | 0.436 | 1.04 (0.98–1.10) | 0.237 |
Comparative weight at age 10 | ||||||
About average | Reference | |||||
Thinner | 1.06 (1.01–1.11) | 0.031 | 1.05 (1.00–1.11) | 0.025 | 1.00 (0.94–1.05) | 0.890 |
Plumper | 1.34 (1.26–1.43) | <0.001 | 1.34 (1.25–1.42) | <0.001 | 1.05 (0.99–1.13) | 0.127 |
Relative age of first facial hair | ||||||
About average | Reference | |||||
Younger than average age | 1.19 (1.07–1.31) | 0.001 | 1.16 (1.05–1.29) | 0.004 | 1.10 (0.99–1.22) | 0.093 |
Older than average age | 0.89 (0.82–0.97) | 0.006 | 0.87 (0.80–0.95) | 0.002 | 0.96 (0.87–1.04) | 0.318 |
Age at menarche | ||||||
Menarche (per year increase) | 0.97 (0.94–0.99) | 0.017 | 0.96 (0.93–0.99) | 0.010 | 1.01 (0.98–1.05) | 0.380 |
12–14 | Reference | |||||
≤12 | 1.15 (1.04–1.28) | 0.006 | 1.14 (1.03–1.27) | 0.012 | 1.00 (0.89–1.12) | 0.981 |
>14 | 1.11 (0.97–1.26) | 0.134 | 1.06 (0.92–1.21) | 0.426 | 1.11 (0.96–1.28) | 0.172 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network. Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) Conference 2023: Early-Career Investigators’ Abstracts. Gout Urate Cryst. Depos. Dis. 2024, 2, 173-205. https://doi.org/10.3390/gucdd2020015
Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network. Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) Conference 2023: Early-Career Investigators’ Abstracts. Gout, Urate, and Crystal Deposition Disease. 2024; 2(2):173-205. https://doi.org/10.3390/gucdd2020015
Chicago/Turabian StyleGout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network. 2024. "Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) Conference 2023: Early-Career Investigators’ Abstracts" Gout, Urate, and Crystal Deposition Disease 2, no. 2: 173-205. https://doi.org/10.3390/gucdd2020015
APA StyleGout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network. (2024). Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) Conference 2023: Early-Career Investigators’ Abstracts. Gout, Urate, and Crystal Deposition Disease, 2(2), 173-205. https://doi.org/10.3390/gucdd2020015