Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Geometry Change of 1,3-Dicyanobenzene upon Electronic Excitation from a Franck–Condon Fit of Several Fluorescence Emission Spectra
Previous Article in Journal
Integral UV Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Clopidogrel Bisulphate and Metamizole Sodium in Rinse Waters from Industrial Equipment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vibrational Markers of a Model Circulating Metastatic Cells LLC-R9
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optical Gain in Eu-Doped Hybrid Nanocrystals Embedded SiO2-HfO2-ZnO Ternary Glass-Ceramic Waveguides

by
Subhabrata Ghosh
1,*,
Sylvia Turrell
2,
Maurizio Ferrari
3 and
Shivakiran Bhaktha B. N.
4
1
Institute for Solid State Physics, Leibniz University Hannover, Appelstrasse 2, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
2
LASIR (CNRS, UMR 8516) and CERLA, Université Lille 1, 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
3
IFN-CNR, CSMFO Lab. and FBK Photonics Unit, Via alla Cascata 56/C, 38123 Povo, TN, Italy
4
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Spectrosc. J. 2025, 3(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/spectroscj3010003
Submission received: 10 November 2024 / Revised: 20 December 2024 / Accepted: 11 January 2025 / Published: 18 January 2025

Abstract

:
Rare-earth doped transparent glass-ceramic waveguides are playing a very crucial role in integrated optics. We fabricated ZnO-HfO2 hybrid nanocrystals embedded with 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO (x = 0, 2, 5 and 7 mol %) ternary transparent glass-ceramic waveguides doped with 1 mol % Eu-ions. The formation and size of the nanocrystals evolved with an increase in ZnO concentration in the glass-ceramic waveguides. In this context, key factors of such nanocrystals embedded active glass-ceramic waveguides were optical losses and transparency. A lab-built m-line experimental set-up was used for the characterization of the waveguides. On the other hand, optical gain measurements of the Eu-doped hybrid nanocrystals embedded glass-ceramic waveguides were performed using the variable stripe length method. The optical amplification of the waveguides was investigated on the red emission line (5D07F2) of Eu-ions pumped by a 532 nm laser in a stripe-like geometry generated by a cylindrical lens. Here, we report, the optical gain in rare-earth activated glass-ceramic waveguides with nanocrystals of varying sizes formed in the waveguides with increasing ZnO concentration.

1. Introduction

“Glass-ceramics” are composite materials where nanoparticles are embedded within an amorphous glass matrix, providing the benefits of a crystalline structure within the glass environment. These materials retain the shape of the original glass but exhibit significantly improved thermal and mechanical properties [1,2]. The unique combination of properties found in glass ceramics, which share characteristics of both single crystals and glasses, makes them highly suitable as host materials for rare-earth (RE) ions, unlike traditional glasses. The crystalline environment within glass ceramics allows for the incorporation of higher concentrations of RE-ions, minimizing the risk of chemical clustering, which can lead to luminescence quenching. In this regard, glass-ceramic waveguides are particularly valuable, as they combine the mechanical and optical advantages of glasses with crystal-like environments for RE-ions.
RE-doped glass-ceramic waveguides have emerged as advanced materials for developing various optoelectronic devices, including integrated optical amplifiers, lasers, etc. [3,4] because of their narrow and intense emissions from the 4f-intrashell transitions [5]. The formation of nanoparticles in glasses and their potential photonic applications have been studied in great detail in the literature [6,7,8,9,10]. However, scattering losses in these waveguides are a key concern, and numerous composite systems have been explored over recent decades to fabricate low-loss glass-ceramic waveguides [11,12].
Among various functional materials, ZnO is very promising as an active optical material for the fabrication of photonic devices [13,14], due to its direct band-gap with a band-gap energy of ~3.3 eV, large exciton binding energy of ~60 meV at room temperature, and also having high optical transparency in both the visible and near-infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.
RE-doped glass-ceramic materials are commonly regarded as stable gain media due to their excellent photoluminescence efficiency and thermal stability. In the past, Er-doped glasses have been demonstrated as potential candidates for the development of optical amplifiers in the near-infrared [15,16]. While there have been few studies exploring optical amplification in RE-doped glasses and glass-ceramics for the visible spectrum [17,18]. In this context, Eu-doped glass-ceramic waveguides with high transparency present a promising system to investigate optical gain in the visible spectral range. In this work, we report the formation and growth of SiO2–HfO2 hybrid nanocrystals and their influence on amplified spontaneous emission in Eu-doped SiO2–HfO2–ZnO ternary waveguides.

2. Materials and Methods

Planar ternary waveguides, doped with 1 mol% Eu and composed of 70 mol% SiO2, (30-x) mol% HfO2 and x mol% ZnO (where x = 0, 2, 5, and 7 mol%), were fabricated by the sol-gel method combined with a dip-coating technique on silicon and vitreous SiO2 (v-SiO2) substrates. The preparation began with the formation of a SiO2 sol, synthesized by mixing ethanol (EtOH), tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), de-ionized H2O, and HCl as a catalyst, in the molar ratio of TEOS:EtOH:HCl:H2O = 10:1:0.03:4. This mixture was pre-hydrolyzed at 65 °C for 1 h.
The ZnO and HfO2 sols were prepared by dissolving zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O) and hafnium dichloride oxide octahydrate (HfOCl2·8H2O) in ethanol. Europium nitrate pentahydrate (Eu(NO3)3·5H2O) was used as the dopant. Both the ZnO and HfO2 sols were then mixed with the TEOS-containing solution, and the final solution was stirred continuously at 40 °C for 16 h to ensure homogeneity [19].
A 0.2 μm Whatman Puradisc syringe filter was used to filter the sol and then it was deposited onto v-SiO2 and Si substrates using a dip-coating technique. After the deposition of each layer, the samples were annealed in a quartz-tube furnace at 900 °C for 1 min in air before proceeding with the next layer. After the deposition of 25 layers, the desired thickness of the waveguide was achieved, which is influenced by the dipping speed, number of deposited layers, and heat treatment process. Figure 1a,b presents the schematic diagrams describing the synthesis of the sol and the fabrication of thin film waveguides using the dip-coating method, respectively.

3. Characterizations

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to analyze the size, distribution, and fringe pattern of the nanocrystal lattices. For TEM sample preparation, the thin film deposited on a silicon substrate was polished and dimpled, followed by milling using Ar+ ions. Bright-field TEM imaging was then performed on these samples by mounting them on a copper grid. The imaging was conducted using a Philips CM200FEG/ST microscope operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV.
A custom-built prism-coupling setup was used to measure the thickness (d) and refractive index (n) of glass-ceramic planar waveguides deposited on a silica-on-silicon substrate [20]. This setup featured a Gadolinium Gallium Garnet (GGG) prism of refractive index 1.965 at 632.8 nm, positioned on a motorized rotational stage with 0.007° resolution. The setup utilized a diode-pumped solid-state laser operating at 532.0 nm and a silicon photodetector. The photometric detection technique was used to determine the propagation losses of the fundamental mode (TE0) at 632.8 nm in the glass-ceramic waveguides by recording the light scattered out of the plane of the waveguide. The image of the propagating streak through the waveguide in the prism coupling configuration was captured using a CCD camera (Stingray F-146B).
Amplified spontaneous emission measurements were carried out by focusing a diode-pumped solid-state (DPSS) continuous wave 532 nm laser onto the waveguide in a stripe-like geometry using a cylindrical lens having a focal length of 50 mm. The emission from the edge of the waveguides was dispersed using a monochromator (Horiba Jobin-Yvon iHR 320) and detected by a photomultiplier tube attached to the monochromator for detection. The UV-visible transmission spectra of the glass-ceramic waveguides were recorded using a fiber-coupled spectrometer (Avantes AvaSpec-ULS3648-USB2) with a spectral resolution of 0.4 nm.

4. Results and Discussions

The nanocrystal structure and size details are important for tailoring them to meet the objectives of any required application [21]. The details of X-ray diffraction studies on the 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO glass-ceramic waveguides have been presented elsewhere [19]. TEM imaging was conducted to analyze the size and distribution of nanocrystals within the ternary matrix. Figure 2a–c presents analytical TEM images of 1 mol % Eu-doped 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO (mol %) ternary films for x values of 2, 5, and 7 mol %, respectively. The TEM images confirmed the formation and growth of hybrid nanocrystals in the SiO2-HfO2 matrix, particularly for samples with 5 and 7 mol % ZnO, as illustrated in Figure 2b,c. The average sizes of the nanocrystals were measured to be 3, 17, and 22 nm for x = 2, 5, and 7 mol %, respectively. Interestingly, increasing the ZnO concentration from x = 5 to 7 mol % resulted in the development of ZnO-HfO2 hybrid nanocrystals, composed of ZnO nanocrystals encapsulated by HfO2 nanocrystals. The formation of HfO2 nanocrystals was further explored through a lattice fringe analysis of the TEM images, shown in Figure 2d, which revealed lattice fringe spacings of 0.295 nm and 0.179 nm for the ZnO (100) and HfO2 (022) lattice planes, respectively.
The waveguiding properties of 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO (with x = 0, 2, 5, and 7 mol %) glass-ceramic waveguides doped with 1 mol% Eu were evaluated using a lab-built prism-coupling setup. The losses of the waveguides were assessed by photometrically detecting the light scattered out of the plane of the waveguide, using a CCD camera. Table 1 summarizes the refractive indices (n) measured at 532.0 nm, thicknesses (d), and propagation losses measured at 632.8 nm of the heat-treated waveguides. A decrease in refractive indices from 1.503 to 1.499 (± 0.005) was observed with increasing ZnO concentrations, attributed to the incorporation of ZnO (n = 2.02) replacing the relatively higher index HfO2 (n = 2.12). The thickness of the waveguides was found to be 0.9±0.1 μm. Propagation losses from the CCD images were determined to be as low as (0.3 to 0.6) ± 0.2 dB/cm.
The light amplification properties of the 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO (where x = 0, 2, 5, and 7 mol%) ternary glass-ceramic waveguides doped with Eu ions were investigated using the variable stripe length (VSL) method [22,23,24]. For optical pumping, a DPSS continuous wave laser operating at 532 nm was focused on the waveguide in a stripe-like configuration using a cylindrical lens with a focal length of 50 mm and a laser power of 80 mW. An adjustable slit on a micro-positioner stage was used to vary the stripe length of the optical pump beam. Figure 3 illustrates the schematic diagram of the VSL method experiment conducted on the hybrid nanocrystals embedded in the waveguides. Under this setup, the 612 nm emission from Eu3+ (5D07F2 transition) was collected from the edge of the waveguides, dispersed by a monochromator, and recorded by a photomultiplier tube.
The amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) intensity (IASE) measured at the principal peak of the Eu3+ emission spectrum (λ = 612 nm) as a function of stripe length (l) is presented in Figure 4a. The optical gain coefficient (g) can be determined by fitting the plot of IASE against l using a 1-D amplifier model, described by the following expression [22,25,26]:
I A S E = I S P × l g ( e g l 1 )
where ISP is the spontaneous emission intensity per unit length, l is the stripe length of the pump beam, and g is the net optical gain coefficient. The net optical gain for the 1 mol% Eu-doped 70 SiO2–30 HfO2 glass waveguide was found to be 5.3 cm−1. For the glass-ceramic waveguides, the optical gain values were 4.8 cm−1, 3.7 cm−1, and 0.1 cm−1 for ZnO concentrations of 2, 5, and 7 mol%, respectively. These optical gain coefficients were obtained by fitting the experimental data using a 1-D amplifier model up to l = 4 mm. Fitting beyond l > 4 mm was limited due to gain saturation effects in the Eu-doped SiO2–HfO2–ZnO glass-ceramic waveguides. It was observed that the optical gain is higher in the SiO2–HfO2 waveguide without ZnO. The optical gain reduces drastically at the 7 mol% ZnO concentration, wherein the structure and size of the ZnO and HfO2 nanocrystals have been observed to exhibit a large change, as discussed in our earlier work [19]. The PL spectra of waveguides containing 0 and 7 mol % ZnO concentrations are shown in Figure 4b,c, respectively, which were obtained under optical excitation for different stripe lengths (0.4 mm, 4.0 mm, and 6.8 mm). For the x = 0 mol % sample in Figure 4b, the PL spectra mainly consist of the well-known Eu3+ emission from 5D07Fj (j = 0, 1, 2) transitions; however, for the x = 7 mol % sample in Figure 4c, a broad emission background is also observed, attributed to the presence of Eu2+, apart from the discrete features attributed to Eu3+. The shape of the PL spectra is found to remain invariant under different lengths of the excitation stripe, confirming the homogeneous distribution of Eu2+ and Eu3+ ions in the fabricated samples.
The asymmetry ratio (Irel) given by the intensity ratio of the 5D07F2 to the 5D07F1 transition indicates a distortion from the inversion symmetry of the sites around the Eu3+ ions [27]. This ratio, Irel is found to be 2.82 and 1.54 for x = 0 and 7 mol % samples, respectively, indicating the embedding of Eu3+ into less distorted environments in the glass-ceramic sample with 7 mol % ZnO.
Interestingly, the propagation losses of the Eu-doped glass-ceramic samples (70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2 –x ZnO (x = 2, 5 and 7 mol%)) are not very different from that observed in the 70 SiO2–30 HfO2 waveguide, as shown in Table 1. However, the optical gain for the glass-ceramic waveguides is lower in comparison to the 70 SiO2–30 HfO2 waveguide. Hence, the reduced optical gain can neither be associated with the losses in the waveguide nor with the other optical scattering phenomenon. These observations can be explained by considering the reduction of Eu3+ to Eu2+ in the vicinity of ZnO nanocrystals, in waveguides wherein ZnO has been incorporated. This phenomenon has been discussed in our earlier work through photoluminescence (PL) and time-resolved PL analysis [19,28]. Consequently, the concentration of Eu3+ ions decreases with increasing ZnO concentration, resulting in lower optical gain in the ternary glass-ceramic waveguides. Also, with higher ZnO concentrations, the reduction of Eu3+ ions to Eu2+ gives rise to efficient blue light emission [27]. Despite the reduction in net optical gain due to the presence of ZnO, the added functionalities achieved in the 2 and 5 mol% ZnO incorporated 1 mol% Eu-doped ternary glass-ceramic waveguides make them promising candidates for the development of active integrated optical components in the blue and red regions of the visible spectrum.
Figure 5 presents the UV-visible transmission spectra of glass-ceramic waveguides having different ZnO concentrations. The observed modulations are a result of the thin film interference phenomena. The transmittance values exceeding 95% for all the waveguides in the region of 350 nm–900 nm of the electromagnetic spectrum represent the highly transparent nature of the fabricated samples.

5. Conclusions

We have successfully fabricated 70 SiO2-(30 − x) HfO2-x ZnO (with x = 0, 2, 5, and 7 mol %) glass-ceramic waveguides doped with 1 mol% Eu, achieving losses as low as 0.3 to 0.6 ( ± 0.2 dB/cm). The incorporation of 2 mol% ZnO into the SiO2–HfO2 glass waveguide resulted in the formation of smaller nanocrystals, as confirmed by TEM images. With increasing ZnO concentrations (x = 5 and 7 mol%), we observed the formation and growth of hybrid nanocrystals, where ZnO nanocrystals are encapsulated by HfO2 nanocrystals. The net optical gain in the SiO2–HfO2–ZnO ternary glass-ceramic waveguides was found to be lower compared to the SiO2–HfO2 glass waveguides (g = 5.3 cm−1), primarily due to the reduction of Eu3+ to Eu2+ in the vicinity of the ZnO nanocrystals within the ternary matrix. Despite this reduction in optical gain for Eu3+ in the ternary waveguides, the enhanced functionalities provided by the ZnO incorporation, such as the possibility of blue-light emitting waveguides [29], make the 1 mol% Eu-doped ternary glass-ceramic waveguide a viable material system for the fabrication of active on-chip integrated optical components.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G. and S.B.B.N.; methodology, S.G., S.T., M.F. and S.B.B.N.; software, S.G.; validation, S.G. and S.B.B.N.; formal analysis, S.G.; investigation, S.G. and S.B.B.N.; resources, S.G. and S.B.B.N.; data curation, S.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G., S.T., M.F. and S.B.B.N.; writing—review and editing, S.G., S.T., M.F. and S.B.B.N.; visualization, S.G. and S.B.B.N.; supervision, S.B.B.N.; project administration, S.T., M.F. and S.B.B.N.; funding acquisition, S.B.B.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Engineering Research Board via sponsored Project No. CRG/2020/002650 and Indian Space Research Organization project No. SAC/SEDA/EOSDIG/SSD/2023/1. The support received from the Indian Nanoelectronics Users Program (INUP) is also acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kurkjian, C.R.; Prindle, W.R. Perspectives on the history of glass composition. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 81, 795–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ferrari, M.; Righini, G.C. Glass-ceramic materials for guided-wave optics. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2015, 6, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rastogi, R.; Chaurasia, S. Advances in and Future Perspectives on High-Power Ceramic Lasers. Photonics 2024, 11, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mortier, M.; Vivien, D. Ceramic and glass-ceramic lasers. Ann. De Chim. Sci. Des Matériaux 2003, 28, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dieke, G.H.; Crosswhite, H.M.; Crosswhite, H.M. Spectra and Energy Levels of Rare Earth Ions in Crystals; Interscience Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1968; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, Y.; Ohwaki, J. New transparent vitroceramics codoped with Er3+ and Yb3+ for efficient frequency upconversion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 63, 3268–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tick, P.A.; Borrelli, N.F.; Cornelius, L.K.; Newhouse, M.A. Transparent glass ceramics for 1300 nm amplifier applications. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 78, 6367–6374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tick, P.A. Are low-loss glass–ceramic optical waveguides possible? Opt. Lett. 1998, 23, 1904–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blanc, W.; Dussardier, B. Formation and applications of nanoparticles in silica optical fibers. J. Opt. 2016, 45, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kamrádek, M.; Kašík, I.; Aubrecht, J.; Mrázek, J.; Podrazký, O.; Cajzl, J. Nanoparticle and Solution Doping for Efficient Holmium Fiber Lasers. IEEE Photonics J. 2019, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ferreira, P.H.D.; Fabris, D.C.N.; Villas Boas, M.O.C.; Bezerra, I.G.; Mendonça, C.R.; Zanotto, E.D. Transparent glass-ceramic waveguides made by femtosecond laser writing. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 136, 106742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dymshits, O.; Shepilov, M.; Zhilin, A. Transparent glass-ceramics for optical applications. MRS Bull. 2017, 42, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, H.; Xu, J.Y.; Seelig, E.W.; Chang, R.P.H. Microlaser made of disordered media. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 2997–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Son, D.I.; Kwon, B.W.; Park, D.H.; Seo, W.-S.; Yi, Y.; Angadi, B.; Lee, C.-L.; Choi, W.K. Emissive ZnO–graphene quantum dots for white-light-emitting diodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mears, R.J.; Reekie, L.; Poole, S.B.; Payne, D.N. Neodymium-doped silica single-mode fibre laser. Electron. Lett. 1985, 21, 738–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kik, P.G.; Polman, A. Erbium-doped optical-waveguide amplifiers on silicon. MRS Bull. 1998, 23, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, Q.; Li, J.; Zha, T.; Zhang, P.; Long, Y.; Fang, Z. Low-Temperature Fluoro-Borosilicate Glass for Controllable Nano-Crystallization in Glass Ceramic Fibers. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lahoz, F.; Capuj, N.E.; Navarro-Urrios, D.; Hernández, S.E. Stimulated emission and light amplification in Ho3+ doped oxyfluoride glasses and glass-ceramics. Photonic Mater. Devices Appl. II 2007, 6593, 176–183. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ghosh, S.; Bhaktha, S.N.B. Eu-doped ZnO-HfO2 hybrid nanocrystal-embedded low-loss glass-ceramic waveguides. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 105202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tien, P.K. Light Waves in Thin Films and Integrated Optics. Appl. Opt. 1971, 10, 2395–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ji, Y.; Zhong, Q.; Yang, X.; Li, L.; Li, Q.; Xu, H.; Chen, P.; Li, S.; Yan, H.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Surface Engineering Enables Efficient AgBiS2 Quantum Dot Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 10418–10425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pavesi, L.; Dal Negro, L.; Mazzoleni, C.; Franzo, G.; Priolo, F. Optical gain in silicon nanocrystals. Nature 2000, 408, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yamashita, K.; Takeuchi, N.; Taniguchi, H.; Yuyama, S.; Oe, K.; Mibuka, N.; Suzuki, A.; Mataki, H. Amplification properties of Tb(III) green emission in polymeric waveguide doped with Tb–Al nanocluster. J. Lumin. 2009, 129, 526–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McGehee, M.D.; Gupta, R.; Veenstra, S.; Miller, E.K.; Diaz-Garcia, M.A.; Heeger, A.J. Amplified spontaneous emission from photopumped films of a conjugated polymer. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 7035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shaklee, K.L.; Leheny, R.F. Direct determination of optical gain in semiconductor crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1971, 18, 475–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yariv, A. Quantum Electronics, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bhaktha, S.N.B.; Beclin, F.; Bouazaoui, M.; Capoen, B.; Chiasera, A.; Ferrari, M.; Kinowski, C.; Righini, G.C.; Robbe, O.; Turrell, S. Enhanced fluorescence from Eu3+ in low-loss silica glass-ceramic waveguides with high SnO2 content. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 211904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ghosh, S.; Valligatla, S.; Lukowiak, A.; Chiasera, A.; Ferrari, M.; Bhaktha, S.N.B. Time-resolved photoluminescence studies in Eu-doped SiO2—HfO2—ZnO glass-ceramic waveguides. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 1145–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ghosh, S.; Bhaktha, S.N.B. Effect of structural evolution of ZnO/HfO2 nanocrystals on Eu2+/Eu3+ emission in glass-ceramic waveguides for photonic applications. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 225202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the glass-ceramic waveguide fabrication process via (a) sol-gel synthesis, and (b) dip-coating method followed by heat treatment.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the glass-ceramic waveguide fabrication process via (a) sol-gel synthesis, and (b) dip-coating method followed by heat treatment.
Spectroscj 03 00003 g001
Figure 2. TEM images of 1 mol% Eu-doped 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO ternary films for x = (a) 2, (b) 5 and (c) 7 mol%. (d) Lattice fringe pattern of nanocrystals embedded in the silica matrix.
Figure 2. TEM images of 1 mol% Eu-doped 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO ternary films for x = (a) 2, (b) 5 and (c) 7 mol%. (d) Lattice fringe pattern of nanocrystals embedded in the silica matrix.
Spectroscj 03 00003 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the VSL method experiment performed on hybrid nanocrystals embedded ternary glass-ceramic waveguides.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the VSL method experiment performed on hybrid nanocrystals embedded ternary glass-ceramic waveguides.
Spectroscj 03 00003 g003
Figure 4. (a) The amplified spontaneous emission intensity (IASE) of 1 mol% Eu-doped 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO (x = 0, 2, 5 and 7 mol%) ternary waveguides at 5D07F2 transition of Eu3+ (λ = 612 nm) as a function of stripe length (l) under 532 nm continuous wave laser pumping. The PL spectra obtained under optical excitation at different stripe lengths, 0.4 mm, 4.0 mm, and 6.8 mm are shown for waveguides containing (b) 0 and (c) 7 mol % ZnO concentrations.
Figure 4. (a) The amplified spontaneous emission intensity (IASE) of 1 mol% Eu-doped 70 SiO2–(30-x) HfO2–x ZnO (x = 0, 2, 5 and 7 mol%) ternary waveguides at 5D07F2 transition of Eu3+ (λ = 612 nm) as a function of stripe length (l) under 532 nm continuous wave laser pumping. The PL spectra obtained under optical excitation at different stripe lengths, 0.4 mm, 4.0 mm, and 6.8 mm are shown for waveguides containing (b) 0 and (c) 7 mol % ZnO concentrations.
Spectroscj 03 00003 g004
Figure 5. UV-visible transmission spectra of glass-ceramic waveguides with various ZnO concentrations (x = 0, 2, 5 and 7 mol%).
Figure 5. UV-visible transmission spectra of glass-ceramic waveguides with various ZnO concentrations (x = 0, 2, 5 and 7 mol%).
Spectroscj 03 00003 g005
Table 1. The optical properties of 70 SiO2–(30 − x) HfO2–x ZnO (with x = 0, 2, 5 and 7 mol %) glass-ceramic waveguides doped with 1 mol% Eu. Refractive indices (n) at 532.0 nm and propagation losses of waveguides measured at 632.8 nm, the optical gain (g) of waveguides measured at the principal peak of the Eu3+ emission spectrum (λ = 612 nm) using variable stripe length method under the excitation of 532 nm, are tabulated.
Table 1. The optical properties of 70 SiO2–(30 − x) HfO2–x ZnO (with x = 0, 2, 5 and 7 mol %) glass-ceramic waveguides doped with 1 mol% Eu. Refractive indices (n) at 532.0 nm and propagation losses of waveguides measured at 632.8 nm, the optical gain (g) of waveguides measured at the principal peak of the Eu3+ emission spectrum (λ = 612 nm) using variable stripe length method under the excitation of 532 nm, are tabulated.
Waveguide Composition (mol%)Refractive Index (n) (±0.005)Thickness (d) (±0.1 µm)Propagation Loss @ 632.8 nm (±0.2 dB/cm)Nanocrystal
Size
(nm)
Optical Gain (g) cm−1
70 SiO2–30 HfO21.5030.90.4-5.3
70 SiO2–28 HfO2–2 ZnO1.5020.90.634.8
70 SiO2–25 HfO2–5 ZnO1.5060.90.3173.7
70 SiO2–23 HfO2–7 ZnO1.4990.90.5220.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghosh, S.; Turrell, S.; Ferrari, M.; N., S.B.B. Optical Gain in Eu-Doped Hybrid Nanocrystals Embedded SiO2-HfO2-ZnO Ternary Glass-Ceramic Waveguides. Spectrosc. J. 2025, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/spectroscj3010003

AMA Style

Ghosh S, Turrell S, Ferrari M, N. SBB. Optical Gain in Eu-Doped Hybrid Nanocrystals Embedded SiO2-HfO2-ZnO Ternary Glass-Ceramic Waveguides. Spectroscopy Journal. 2025; 3(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/spectroscj3010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghosh, Subhabrata, Sylvia Turrell, Maurizio Ferrari, and Shivakiran Bhaktha B. N. 2025. "Optical Gain in Eu-Doped Hybrid Nanocrystals Embedded SiO2-HfO2-ZnO Ternary Glass-Ceramic Waveguides" Spectroscopy Journal 3, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/spectroscj3010003

APA Style

Ghosh, S., Turrell, S., Ferrari, M., & N., S. B. B. (2025). Optical Gain in Eu-Doped Hybrid Nanocrystals Embedded SiO2-HfO2-ZnO Ternary Glass-Ceramic Waveguides. Spectroscopy Journal, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/spectroscj3010003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop