Next Article in Journal
Agro-Industrial Residues as Additives in Tropical Grass Silage: An Integrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Alternative Warm-Season Annual Grasses for Forage Production in Water-Limited Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. Inclusion on the Chemical Composition, Fermentation Dynamics, and In Vitro Digestibility of Medicago sativa L. Silage

1
Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of the Azores, Rua Capitão João d’Ávila, 9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
2
IITTA—Instituto de Investigação e Tecnologias Agrárias e do Ambiente, Rua Capitão João d’Ávila, 9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Grasses 2025, 4(3), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses4030037
Submission received: 14 July 2025 / Revised: 26 August 2025 / Accepted: 2 September 2025 / Published: 11 September 2025

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of Acacia melanoxylon inclusion in Medicago sativa silage on chemical composition, fermentation quality, in vitro digestibility, gas production, and energy value. Due to its high moisture content, M. sativa presents challenges for ensiling. A. melanoxylon, a woody legume with high dry matter (DM) content, was tested as a structural additive. Five treatments were prepared—control (100% M. sativa) and mixtures with 6, 12, 24, and 48% A. melanoxylon (fresh basis)—and ensiled for 45 days under vacuum. Silages were analyzed for DM, crude protein, fiber fractions, pH, ammonia nitrogen, in vitro digestibility, gas production kinetics, and estimated energy values (ME and NEL). Increasing Acacia raised DM (17.75 ± 0.04 → 28.45 ± 0.11%) and reduced pH (5.86 ± 0.01 → 4.53 ± 0.01) and NH3-N/Total N (11.38 ± 0.10% → 8.05 ± 0.10%), indicating improved fermentation quality. Conversely, crude protein, digestibility (IVDMD 62.61 ± 0.05% → 48.02 ± 0.16%), and cumulative gas at 96 h decreased, as did energy values (ME 5.91 → 4.45 MJ/kg DM; NEL 3.13 → 2.02 MJ/kg DM) at higher inclusion levels; gas-kinetic parameters reflected the same trend (lower b and c). Overall, A. melanoxylon acts as a structural co-ensiling option that increases DM and supports fermentation quality while clearly delineating nutritional and fermentability trade-offs; low-to-moderate inclusion (6–12%) appears advisable to balance process benefits against acceptable nutritional penalties.

1. Introduction

The conservation of forages through ensiling is a fundamental strategy to ensure a continuous and reliable supply of feed for ruminants, particularly in production systems where seasonal variability limits pasture availability [1]. While grasses are most commonly used for silage due to their high content of water-soluble carbohydrates and favorable fermentation profile, legumes such as Medicago sativa L. (alfalfa) are also widely employed because of their high crude protein content, mineral richness, and functional bioactive compounds [2,3].
However, M. sativa presents specific challenges for silage making. Its low concentration of soluble sugars, high buffering capacity, and elevated protein content can hinder acidification, promoting proteolytic fermentation and the formation of undesirable nitrogenous compounds such as ammonia and biogenic amines [4,5]. Furthermore, when ensiled with a dry matter (DM) content below 30%, effluent losses are common, compromising both silage quality and environmental safety [6]. To mitigate these issues, strategies such as field wilting, co-ensiling with energy-rich crops, or the addition of structural or functional additives have been explored [7,8]. Evidence from mixed-forage systems also indicates that blending alfalfa with other roughages can improve fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility, and inclusion of alfalfa enhanced the nutritive value of straw–grass mixed silages in Tibet [9].
Among these strategies, the inclusion of high-DM woody legumes has emerged as a promising approach to improve the physical structure of the silage mass, enhance fermentation dynamics, and, in some cases, contribute to methane mitigation due to the presence of condensed tannins [10,11]. Acacia melanoxylon R. Br., a leguminous tree from the Fabaceae family, is widespread in the Azores, where it behaves as an invasive species. This evergreen tree is characterized by its high biomass yield, persistent canopy, and dense foliage. It also exhibits high nitrogen-fixing ability and strong regeneration capacity, including fire-induced germination [12,13]. From a zootechnical perspective, A. melanoxylon has been considered a potential alternative protein source and is particularly rich in condensed tannins [14]. Although its direct inclusion in ruminant diets is limited by antinutritional factors and low digestibility, its combination with highly digestible forages such as M. sativa could provide a local, pragmatic solution to increase pre-ensiling DM and improve packing/anaerobiosis while managing trade-offs in digestibility and fermentability [15,16].
Beyond classical nutritional endpoints, silage evaluation increasingly uses in vitro gas production because total gas and kinetic parameters reflect the extent and rate of rumen microbial fermentation under standardized conditions; gas arises mainly from CO2 and CH4 during carbohydrate fermentation, so higher volumes generally indicate more extensive degradation (albeit not methane partitioning), and gas at specific time points (e.g., 24 h) is commonly used together with crude protein and ether extract to estimate metabolizable and net lactation energy via the Menke–Steingass equations [17]. In parallel, ensiling performance must also account for process attributes achieving adequate dry matter (DM) to curb effluent, promoting rapid acidification, minimizing proteolysis (NH3–N), and ensuring aerobic stability, because structural additives that raise DM improve packing and anaerobiosis may increase fiber and lignin, with predictable impacts on digestibility and in vitro fermentability [18]. In our study region, M. sativa is widely conserved as hay/haylage/silage, while unmanaged stands of the invasive tree Acacia melanoxylon generate abundant high-DM biomass; together these factors motivate testing A. melanoxylon as a structural co-ensiling complement to raise pre-ensiling DM and support fermentation quality, while explicitly quantifying the associated trade-offs in digestibility, energy value, and gas production [9,10,11].
Although this work is grounded in an island agroecosystem, its scope extends beyond a single locality. The core question, whether a locally abundant, high-DM woody legume can serve as a structural co-ensiling resource for alfalfa applies to many humid temperate regions where alfalfa is harvested at low DM and woody or tannin-rich biomass is accessible (including areas invaded by Acacia spp.). The mechanisms involved (DM management, packing/anaerobiosis, proteolysis control, and the digestibility–fermentability trade-off linked to fiber/lignin and tannins) are generalizable, while quantitative outcomes depend on chemotype, inclusion rate, maturity, and management. Hence, the results are transferable in principle and cautiously extrapolatable to similar contexts, acknowledging that in vitro assays are proxies and do not replace in vivo trials [9,10,11,15].
In many humid temperate regions, improving silage quality is constrained by low pre-ensiling DM and limited access to water-soluble carbohydrates. Where invasive woody biomass is abundant, co-ensiling can provide a locally available structural resource to raise DM and support fermentation. Among potential species, A. melanoxylon is particularly suitable because it is widespread as an invasive tree, generates substantial residues through routine control, and combines high DM with a condensed-tannin profile. These features create a pragmatic opportunity for valorization while addressing ensiling constraints.
We tested whether incremental inclusion of A. melanoxylon in M. sativa silage functions as a structural co-ensiling strategy that increases dry matter and improves fermentation quality (pH, NH3-N), while quantifying the nutritional trade-offs and the effects on fermentability captured by in vitro gas production kinetics. We hypothesized that low-to-moderate inclusion levels (6–12%) would improve ensiling conditions relative to alfalfa-only silage, with limited penalties to digestibility, whereas higher inclusion levels would increasingly constrain fermentability and energy value [17].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Conditions

The study site lies in the municipality of Angra do Heroísmo (Terceira, Azores; ~300 m a.s.l.), on volcanic soils classified as Andosols derived from pyroclastic parent materials (vitric Hapluand), which are well suited to agriculture due to their favorable physical properties. The local climate is temperate oceanic with a dry-summer subtype (Köppen Csb). At this elevation, monthly temperatures ranged from 11.6 to 20.4 °C, total annual precipitation was 1280.3 mm, average monthly wind speed was 0.32–1.61 m s−1, relative humidity remained high (86.1–95.0%), and incoming solar radiation was low (51.9–171.6 W m−2); rainfall typically peaks in January–February and is lowest in July [19].

2.2. Sample Collection and Preparation

In December 2024, Medicago sativa L. was harvested on Terceira Island (Azores, Portugal) from a commercial field in the municipality of Angra do Heroísmo at the vegetative stage, prior to flowering. On the same day, leaves of Acacia melanoxylon were collected from unmanaged, wild-growing stands within the municipality of Angra do Heroísmo, selecting healthy, fully expanded foliage without inflorescences and avoiding lignified twigs and petioles.
M. sativa was air-dried naturally for 48 h and then chopped into fragments of 2–3 cm. A. melanoxylon leaves were subjected to the same wilting and chopping procedure.

2.3. Silage Preparation

Five treatments were prepared, corresponding to different inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon in the M. sativa:
TC—Control (100% M. sativa)
T1—94% M. sativa + 6% A. melanoxylon
T2—88% M. sativa + 12% A. melanoxylon
T3—76% M. sativa + 24% A. melanoxylon
T4—52% M. sativa + 48% A. melanoxylon
Each treatment was prepared in triplicate (three independent mini-silos; totaling 15 silage units). Approximately 2.5 kg of each mixture was packed into airtight plastic bags, vacuum-sealed to ensure anaerobic conditions, and stored in a dark room at ambient temperature (18–25 °C) for 45 days. All laboratory determinations were run in duplicate (technical replicates) and averaged per mini-silo, which served as the experimental unit for subsequent analyses.

2.4. Chemical Analysis

At the end of the fermentation period, silages were opened and sampled. A portion of each sample was frozen for later analysis of pH and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N/Total N). The remaining sample was oven-dried at 65 °C in a forced-air oven until constant weight and ground to 1 mm in a Retsch mill (Haan, Germany).
Chemical composition was assessed using standard Weende methods [20], including, Dry Matter (DM), method 930.15, Ash, method 942.05, Ether Extract (EE), method 920.39, Crude Protein (CP), method 954.01.
Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) were determined according to Goering and Van Soest [21].
pH was measured using a potentiometric method with a glass electrode [22], and ammonia nitrogen in silage water extracts was determined by acidifying 10 mL of filtrate with 10 mL 0.2 N HCl (1 h, room temperature) and steam-distilling on a Kjeltec 2300 [23].

2.5. In Vitro Digestibility, Gas Production, and Energy Estimation

The in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IVDMD) and organic matter (IVOMD) was determined using the method of Tilley and Terry [24], modified by Alexander and McGowan [25].
Gas production was assessed according to Menke and Steingass [17]. For each sample, 200 mg of dry matter were incubated in 100 mL calibrated glass syringes with 30 mL of buffered rumen fluid at 39 °C, in an incubator equipped with a motor-driven rotor to provide continuous agitation. Gas volume was recorded at several time points over a 96-h incubation period. The gas production kinetics were modeled using the equation developed by Ørskov and McDonald [26,27].
The metabolizable energy (ME) content of the silages was estimated using the Equation (1) proposed by Menke and Steingass [17], based on gas production, crude protein, and ether extract:
M E M J K g D M = 2.20 + 0.136 × G P + 0.057 × C P + 0.0029 × E E 2
Net energy for lactation (NEL) was subsequently estimated using the following Equation (2) [28]:
N E L M J K g D M = 0.101 × G P + 0.051 × C P + 0.11 × E E
where GP is the gas production (mL/200 mg DM after 24 h), CP is crude protein (g/kg DM), and EE is ether extract (g/kg DM).

2.6. Rumen Fluid Collection

Rumen fluid was collected from the slaughterhouse on Terceira Island immediately after the slaughter of healthy dairy cows, following the procedure described by [28]. The fluid was filtered through four layers of cheesecloth and kept under anaerobic conditions until use.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The study used a completely randomized design (CRD) with five inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon (0, 6, 12, 24, 48% on a fresh basis) and three independent mini-silos per level. Mixtures were randomly allocated to mini-silos; the experimental unit was the individual mini-silo. Data were tested for normality (Shapiro–Wilk) and homogeneity of variances (Levene). One-way ANOVA was applied to compare treatment effects on chemical composition, digestibility, energy value, and gas-kinetic parameters (b, c), with Tukey’s HSD for post hoc comparisons. In addition, polynomial trend tests (linear and quadratic) using the actual inclusion percentages (0, 6, 12, 24, 48%) were conducted to evaluate dose–response patterns across the ordered gradient. For time-course gas data, repeated-measures ANOVA was applied to cumulative gas (within-subject factor: time; between-subject factor: inclusion level). Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 27.

3. Results

3.1. Pre-Ensiling Chemical and Digestibility Profiles of M. sativa and A. melanoxylon

The results presented in Figure 1 correspond to the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of M. sativa and A. melanoxylon before ensiling. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between species for most parameters. M. sativa exhibited higher crude protein (25.98 ± 0.16%), lower fiber fractions (NDF: 50.09 ± 0.11%; ADF: 34.02 ± 0.20%) and greater digestibility values (IVDMD: 70.61 ± 0.14%; IVOMD: 62.76 ± 0.10%) compared to A. melanoxylon. In contrast, A. melanoxylon presented higher dry matter (43.73 ± 0.07%), NDF (68.90 ± 0.08%), and ADF (50.27 ± 0.15%) contents. No significant differences were detected for acid detergent lignin (ADL) and ether extract (EE). Crude ash was significantly higher in M. sativa (9.75 ± 0.13%) than in A. melanoxylon (5.44 ± 0.02%).

3.1.1. Pre-Ensiling Gas Production Profiles of M. sativa and A. melanoxylon

The in vitro gas production kinetics and cumulative gas production of M. sativa and A. melanoxylon prior to ensiling are shown in Table 1. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for most kinetic parameters and gas volumes between the two species. M. sativa showed a markedly higher potential gas production (parameter b) and fermentation rate (c), as well as a longer lag phase (Lag t), compared to A. melanoxylon. Cumulative gas production was consistently higher in M. sativa across all time points from 8 h onwards (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed at 4 h (p = 0.063), and the soluble fraction (a) was also not significantly different (p = 0.091).
In addition to the kinetic parameters, Figure 2 shows the cumulative gas production over 96 h of in vitro incubation for M. sativa and A. melanoxylon. A significantly higher gas production was observed for M. sativa at all time points from 8 h onwards (p < 0.001), reaching a maximum of 37.29 mL/0.2 g DM at 96 h. In contrast, A. melanoxylon exhibited a limited and gradual fermentation pattern, with a final value of only 12.15 mL/0.2 g DM. These results confirm the slower fermentative behavior of A. melanoxylon as already indicated by the kinetic parameters (Table 1), particularly the lower potential gas volume (b), the absence of a lag phase, and the reduced fermentation rate (c). This profile suggests a lower digestibility of A. melanoxylon, possibly related to its higher fiber and lignin contents.

3.1.2. Effect of Ensiling on M. sativa Composition and Digestibility

A comparison between fresh M. sativa and the ensiled control (TC) is presented in Figure 3. Ensiling led to a slight but significant decrease in crude protein (from 25.98 ± 0.10% to 22.85 ± 0.19%, p < 0.05), and in vitro digestibility (IVDMD decreased from 70.61 ± 0.46% to 62.61 ± 0.05%; IVOMD from 62.76 ± 0.14% to 54.14 ± 0.04%, p < 0.05). Fiber contents, particularly NDF and ADF, increased slightly after ensiling (NDF: 50.09 ± 0.08% to 53.94 ± 0.20%; ADF: 34.02 ± 0.19% to 35.29 ± 0.20%). These changes are consistent with typical fermentation losses and nutrient transformations during the ensiling process.

3.2. Chemical Analysis of M. sativa Silages with Different Inclusion Levels of A. melanoxylon

The chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of the experimental silages are presented in Table 2 and Figure 4. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among treatments for most parameters. Dry matter (DM) content increased progressively with the inclusion level of A. melanoxylon, ranging from 17.75 ± 0.04% in the control (TC) to 28.45 ± 0.11% in T4. Conversely, crude protein (CP) content decreased with higher A. melanoxylon inclusion, with T4 presenting the lowest value (19.85 ± 0.09%).
Fiber fractions also increased with the inclusion of A. melanoxylon. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) rose from 53.94 ± 0.20% in TC to 63.12 ± 0.08% in T4, while acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) followed the same trend, reaching 53.01 ± 0.17% and 9.98 ± 0.03% in T4, respectively. These increases were accompanied by a decline in both in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), which decreased significantly (p < 0.001) in the highest inclusion treatments, particularly T4 (48.02 ± 0.16% and 40.61 ± 0.22%, respectively).

3.2.1. Fermentation Profile of Silages

The fermentation characteristics of the silages, including pH and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N/Total N), are shown in Table 3. A clear and significant decrease (p < 0.001) in pH was observed with increasing A. melanoxylon inclusion, from 5.86 ± 0.01 in TC to 4.53 ± 0.01 in T4. Similarly, the NH3-N/Total N ratio followed a decreasing trend, ranging from 11.38 ± 0.10% in the control silage to 8.05 ± 0.10% in T4.
These results suggest that A. melanoxylon inclusion improved the fermentation quality of the silages, promoting lower pH values and reducing proteolysis, as indicated by the lower ammonia nitrogen content. Despite the high fiber and lignin contents observed in the previous section, the ensiling process appears to have been effective across treatments.

3.2.2. Estimated Energy Content of Silages

The energy values of the silages, expressed as net energy for lactation (NEL) and metabolizable energy (ME), are presented in Figure 5. Both parameters followed a similar decreasing trend as the inclusion level of A. melanoxylon increased. The control treatment (TC) exhibited the highest energy values (3.13 ± 0.016 MJ/kg DM for NEL and 5.91 ± 0.010 MJ/kg DM for ME), while the lowest values were recorded in T4 (2.02 ± 0.012 MJ/kg DM for NEL and 4.45 ± 0.005 MJ/kg DM for ME). These results suggest that increasing proportions of A. melanoxylon in M. sativa silage consistently reduce its energetic value.

3.2.3. Gas Production Kinetics and Fermentability of Silages

Gas production kinetics and cumulative gas production of M. sativa silages with increasing levels of A. melanoxylon inclusion are presented in Table 4. Significant differences were observed among treatments for the kinetic parameters b (volume of gas produced from the insoluble but fermentable fraction), c (rate of gas production), and lag time, with p < 0.001. However, parameter a (gas produced from the soluble fraction) did not differ significantly between treatments (p = 0.06), indicating a comparable initial fermentation behavior.
For cumulative gas production, no significant differences were observed at 4 h of incubation (p = 0.10), but from 8 h onwards, treatments differed significantly (p < 0.001). The control treatment (TC) consistently exhibited higher gas volumes across all time points compared to silages with A. melanoxylon inclusion. Treatments T2 and T4 produced the lowest cumulative gas volumes at later incubation times, suggesting a reduction in fermentative activity with increasing levels of A. melanoxylon.
A general decreasing trend in gas production and fermentation rate was observed as the inclusion level of A. melanoxylon increased.
Figure 6 illustrates the cumulative gas production profiles over 96 h of in vitro fermentation for silages containing increasing inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon. The control treatment (TC), composed solely of M. sativa, showed the highest gas production throughout the incubation period, reaching 29.74 ± 0.26 mL/0.2 g DM at 96 h. In contrast, the inclusion of A. melanoxylon resulted in lower gas volumes, with T2 displaying the most pronounced reduction in fermentability. Treatments T1 and T3 exhibited similar gas production kinetics, while T4 produced intermediate values. Overall, the data indicate a negative dose-dependent effect of A. melanoxylon inclusion on gas production, supporting the results presented in Table 4.

4. Discussion

The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of including A. melanoxylon in M. sativa silage on chemical composition, fermentation quality, digestibility, energy value, and in vitro fermentability. Due to its high moisture content, M. sativa is prone to excessive effluent loss and undesirable fermentation when ensiled alone, particularly when harvested in the vegetative stage [29]. In this context, biomass sources with higher dry matter (DM) content, such as A. melanoxylon, may serve as effective structural complements to improve the physical and fermentative characteristics of the silage.

4.1. Impact of Ensiling on Fresh M. sativa Quality

A comparison between fresh M. sativa and the ensiled control (TC) confirmed typical alterations associated with the ensiling process. Slight but significant reductions were observed in crude protein content (from 25.98 ± 0.10% to 22.85 ± 0.19%, p < 0.05), as well as in digestibility parameters (IVDMD decreased from 70.61 ± 0.46% to 62.61 ± 0.05%; IVOMD from 62.76 ± 0.14% to 54.14 ± 0.04%, p < 0.001). Fiber contents, including NDF and ADF, increased slightly after ensiling (NDF: 50.09 ± 0.08% to 53.94 ± 0.20%; ADF: 34.02 ± 0.19% to 35.29 ± 0.20%), consistent with literature on proteolysis and fiber concentration due to fermentation losses [18,30]. These results highlight the importance of assessing any additional changes introduced by the inclusion of A. melanoxylon on top of the baseline modifications caused by ensiling itself.
Mechanistically, these shifts reflect the low water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content and high buffering capacity of M. sativa, which slow acidification and favour proteolysis/deamination; the conversion of true protein into non-protein nitrogen, including ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), helps explain the observed CP decrease. In parallel, the removal/fermentation of soluble components and effluent losses lead to an apparent concentration of cell-wall fractions rather than de novo fibre formation, accounting for the modest increases in NDF and ADF and for the penalties in IVDMD/IVOMD typically reported in alfalfa silages made at lower packing DM [6,18,31].
From a process viewpoint, these baseline responses in M. sativa—delayed pH decline, greater proteolysis and reduced digestibility—underscore the central role of pre-ensiling DM management for achieving rapid acidification and preserving protein. They also provide a clear rationale for testing high-DM structural complements such as A. melanoxylon: by elevating DM they are expected to improve packing and anaerobiosis and to support lactic fermentation. At the same time, increasing the proportion of structural biomass inevitably raises fiber and lignin and dilutes readily fermentable components, which can depress digestibility, energy value, and in vitro gas production; therefore, the practical challenge is to identify low-to-moderate inclusion ranges that secure process benefits (higher DM, improved packing/anaerobiosis) while keeping nutritional penalties within acceptable bounds [7,8,9,10,11,17,18]

4.2. Chemical Composition and Gas Production Kinetics Prior to Ensiling

Prior to ensiling, M. sativa and A. melanoxylon showed distinct nutritional and fermentative profiles. As expected, M. sativa exhibited higher crude protein (CP), lower fiber fractions (NDF, ADF, and ADL), and superior in vitro digestibility (IVDMD and IVOMD), consistent with its classification as a high-quality forage legume [32,33]. In contrast, A. melanoxylon presented markedly higher DM and lignin contents, and correspondingly lower digestibility, limiting its value as a standalone forage source.
Fermentation kinetics further emphasized these differences. M. sativa showed significantly higher cumulative gas production and faster fermentation kinetics (higher b and c values), while A. melanoxylon produced minimal gas, exhibited no measurable lag phase, and had a lower fermentation rate. This profile is characteristic of woody species with high concentrations of structural carbohydrates and lignin [34,35]. The absence of a lag phase and the reduced fermentation rate are consistent with limited microbial access to lignified tissue [6].
Altogether, these results support the rationale for using A. melanoxylon only as a complementary biomass in ensiling mixtures. Its high DM content may aid in achieving optimal moisture conditions for ensiling, but its nutritional limitations suggest it should be used at restricted inclusion levels.

4.3. Effect of A. melanoxylon Inclusion on Silage Composition and Digestibility

Post-ensiling analyses revealed that increasing levels of A. melanoxylon inclusion resulted in a progressive rise in DM content, confirming its potential to improve silage structure and reduce effluent losses [36]. However, this benefit came at the cost of nutritional quality. CP content declined, while fiber fractions and ADL increased significantly, particularly in T3 and T4. These changes were reflected in reduced IVDMD and IVOMD values, indicating impaired microbial degradability of the silage substrate [37,38].
Interestingly, while ether extract (EE) content showed no clear trend, ash content decreased, likely due to the dilution of M. sativa’s higher mineral fraction. Despite these shifts, fermentation indicators such as pH and ammonia nitrogen (N-NH3/N) showed favorable trends. The reduction in pH across treatments suggests that A. melanoxylon inclusion did not compromise lactic acid production; on the contrary, the drier biomass may have improved compaction and anaerobiosis [36,39]. The observed decrease in N-NH3/N ratios indicates reduced proteolysis and better protein preservation during ensiling [40,41].

4.4. Energy Value and In Vitro Fermentation After Ensiling

The metabolizable energy (ME) and net energy for lactation (NEL) values decreased progressively with A. melanoxylon inclusion, consistent with the reductions observed in digestibility and the increase in fiber fractions. The TC showed the highest energy values (5.91 MJ/kg DM ME; 3.13 MJ/kg DM NEL), while T4 exhibited the lowest (4.45 and 2.02 MJ/kg DM, respectively). This trend corroborates literature indicating that lignified or phenolic-rich forages reduce energy availability due to limited fermentation and microbial access [42,43].
Cumulative gas production also declined significantly with higher A. melanoxylon inclusion. Treatments T2–T4 showed consistently lower gas volumes, particularly beyond 24 h of incubation, suggesting reduced rumen fermentation potential. The b and c parameters further confirmed reduced fermentability, while lag time was variable among treatments. This variability may be explained by differential microbial responses to secondary compounds, such as tannins, present in A. melanoxylon [44].
These results are consistent with findings from studies involving other woody legumes or phenolic-rich forages, where partial inclusion may aid in DM management but excessive levels compromise degradability and energy release [45].

5. Conclusions

This study evaluated A. melanoxylon not only as a nutritional diluent but primarily as a structural co-ensiling strategy in M. sativa silage, showing that improvements in dry matter and fermentation quality are accompanied by predictable reductions in digestibility, energy value, and in vitro gas production as inclusion increases. Low to moderate inclusion (6–12%) offered the best trade-off supporting ensiling conditions (higher DM, lower pH and NH3-N) while keeping nutritional penalties within acceptable bounds, whereas higher inclusion markedly constrained fermentability and energy. These findings support the judicious, partial use of A. melanoxylon to enhance M. sativa ensilability and warrant in vivo validation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.D., H.N. and A.B.; methodology, C.M.D.; validation, C.M.D. and V.M.; formal analysis, C.M.D.; investigation, C.M.D. and V.M.; resources, A.B.; data curation, C.M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.D.; writing—review and editing, H.N.; supervision, A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research and Technology (IITAA), University of the Azores.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kung, L., Jr.; Shaver, R. Interpretation of silage fermentation analyses. Proc. Am. Forage Grassl. Counc. 2001, 29, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gao, R.; Wang, B.; Jia, T.; Luo, Y.; Yu, Z. Effects of different carbohydrate sources on alfalfa silage quality at different ensiling days. Agriculture 2021, 11, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McDonald, P.; Henderson, A.R.; Heron, S.J.E. The Biochemistry of Silage, 2nd ed.; Chalcombe Publications: Tetbury, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rooke, J.A.; Hatfield, R.D. Biochemistry of Forage Cell Walls and Their Digestion. In Silage Science and Technology; Buxton, D.R., Muck, R.E., Harrison, J.H., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 2003; pp. 95–139. [Google Scholar]
  5. Grum, D.E.; Shockey, W.L. Weiss Electrophoretic examination of alfalfa silage proteins. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wilkinson, J.M.; Davies, D.R. The fermentation profile and effluent losses from silage. Grass Forage Sci. 2013, 68, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tao, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, N.; Si, B.; Tu, Y.; Ma, T.; Diao, Q. Effects of different source additives and wilt conditions on the pH value, aerobic stability, and carbohydrate and protein fractions of alfalfa silage. Anim. Sci. J. 2017, 88, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Weinberg, Z.G.; Muck, R.E. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 19, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, S.; Li, J.; Dong, Z.; Chen, L.; Shao, T. Inclusion of alfalfa improves nutritive value and in vitro digestibility of various straw–grass mixed silages in Tibet. Grass Forage Sci. 2018, 73, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Naumann, H.D.; Tedeschi, L.O.; Muir, J.P.; Lambert, B.D. Structural features of condensed tannins affect in vitro ruminal methane production and fermentation characteristics. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 154, 1474–1487. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, M.R.F.; Fishwick, J.; Toovey, A.F.; Woodward, S.L.; Scollan, N.D. Red clover silage improves nitrogen utilisation and reduces ammonia emissions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 265, 114507. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, B.; Xu, Q.; Qin, G.; Yan, T. Effects of mixed ration silages combining legume forage with woody biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 326, 124733. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vieites-Blanco, C.; González-Prieto, S.J. Invasiveness, ecological impacts and control of acacias in southwestern Europe—A review. Web Ecol. 2020, 20, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pereira, A.; Ferreira, V.; Figueiredo, A. Invasive Acacia tree species affect instream litter decomposition through changes in water nitrogen concentration and litter characteristics. Microb. Ecol. 2021, 82, 257–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gutteridge, R.C.; Shelton, H.M. Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture, 2nd ed.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  16. Maduro Dias, C.S.A.M.; Nunes, H.; Vouzela, C.; Madruga, J.; Borba, A. In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Kinetics Determination and Nutritional Evaluation of Several Non-Conventional Plants with Potential for Ruminant Feeding. Fermentation 2023, 9, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Menke, K.H.; Steingass, H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 1988, 28, 7–55. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilkinson, J.M. Silage. In Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism, 2nd ed.; Dijkstra, J., Forbes, J.M., France, J., Eds.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2005; pp. 259–272. [Google Scholar]
  19. Maduro Dias, C.; Machado, M.; Nunes, H.; Borba, A.; Madruga, J.; Monjardino, P. Nitrogen Fertilization Using Conventional and Slow-Release Fertilizers at Multiple Levels in Lolium multiflorum Lam. Pastures. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. AOAC—Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed.; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  21. Goering, H.K.; Van Soest, P.J. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications); Agriculture Handbook No. 379; USDA-ARS: Washington, DC, USA, 1970.
  22. Kung, L.; Grieve, D.B.; Thomas, J.W.; Huber, J.T. Added ammonia or microbial inocula for fermentation and nitrogenous compounds of alfalfa ensiled at various percents of dry matter. J. Dairy Sci. 1984, 67, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moselhy, M.A.; Borba, J.P.; Borba, A.E.S. Improving the nutritive value, in vitro digestibility and aerobic stability of Hedychium gardnerianum silage through application of additives at ensiling time. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2015, 206, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tilley, J.M.A.; Terry, R.A. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci. 1963, 18, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alexander, R.H.; McGowan, M. The routine determination of in vitro digestibility of organic matter in forages. An investigation of the problems associated with continuous large-scale operation. Grass Forage Sci. 1966, 21, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McDonald, P. The Biochemistry of Silage; John Wiley and Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ørskov, E.R.; McDonald, P. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 1979, 92, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dias, C.S.A.M.M.; Nunes, H.P.B.; Vouzela, C.F.M.; Madruga, J.S.; Borba, A.E.S. Influence of the Season on the Nutritive Value and Gas Production of Opuntia ficus-indica and Agave americana L. in Ruminant Feed. Animals 2023, 13, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, S.; Yang, F.; Wang, Y.; Fan, X.; Feng, C.; Wang, Y. Dynamics of fermentation parameters and bacterial community in alfalfa silage ensiled at different DM contents. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Van Soest, P.J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mesquita, C.P.; Duarte, A.M.; Garcia, P.; Belo, A.F.; Portugal, A.V. Effects of storage conditions and conservation period on the quality of dehydrated lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Agriculture 2024, 15, 1438. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dewhurst, R.J.; Scollan, N.D.; Lee, M.R.F.; Ougham, H.J.; Humphreys, M.O. Forage breeding goals to increase the beneficial fatty acid content of ruminant products. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Patra, A.K.; Saxena, J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Getachew, G.; Robinson, P.H.; DePeters, E.J.; Taylor, S.J. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 111, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Makkar, H.P.S. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Rumin. Res. 2003, 49, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ben Salem, H.; Smith, T. Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Rumin. Res. 2008, 77, 174–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Franco, M.; Rinne, M. Dry matter content and additives with different modes of action modify the preservation characteristics of grass silage. Fermentation 2023, 9, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marcinčák, S.; Sabolová, D.; Váradyová, Z.; Mellen, M.; Gálik, B.; Ondrašovičová, S.; Tóthová, C.; Kiššová, Z.; Vršková, M.; Marcinčáková, D. The use of plant extracts and phytogenic feed additives in ruminant nutrition. Animals 2022, 12, 831. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lima, R.; Ribeiro Alves Lourenço, M.; Díaz, R.F.; Castro, A.; Fievez, V. Effect of combined ensiling of sorghum and soybean with or without molasses and lactobacilli on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 155, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moore, K.J.; Jung, H.G. Lignin and fiber digestion. J. Range Manag. 2001, 54, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vargas-Ortiz, L.; Andrade-Yucailla, V.; Barros-Rodríguez, M.; Lima-Orozco, R.; Macías-Rodríguez, E.; Contreras-Barros, K.; Guishca-Cunuhay, C. Influence of Acacia mearnsii fodder on rumen digestion and mitigation of greenhouse gas production. Animals 2022, 12, 2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lagrange, S.; Lobón, S.; Villalba, J. Gas production kinetics and in vitro degradability of tannin-containing legumes, alfalfa and their mixtures. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019, 253, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Buxton, D.R.; Redfearn, D.D. Plant limitations to fiber digestion and utilization. J. Nutr. 1997, 127, 814S–818S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aderao, G.N.; Sahoo, A.; Bhatt, R.S.; Kumawat, P.K.; Soni, L. In vitro rumen fermentation kinetics, metabolite production, methane and substrate degradability of polyphenol-rich plant leaves and their component complete feed blocks. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2018, 60, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Castro-Montoya, J.; Dickhoefer, U. Effects of tropical legume silages on intake, digestibility and performance in large and small ruminants: A review. Grass Forage Sci. 2018, 73, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of M. sativa and A. melanoxylon. Bars represent the mean ± standard error (n = 3). CP: crude protein; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; ADF: acid detergent fiber; ADL: acid detergent lignin; EE: ether extract; IVDMD: in vitro dry matter digestibility; IVOMD: in vitro organic matter digestibility. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between species for each parameter (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of M. sativa and A. melanoxylon. Bars represent the mean ± standard error (n = 3). CP: crude protein; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; ADF: acid detergent fiber; ADL: acid detergent lignin; EE: ether extract; IVDMD: in vitro dry matter digestibility; IVOMD: in vitro organic matter digestibility. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between species for each parameter (p < 0.05).
Grasses 04 00037 g001
Figure 2. Cumulative in vitro gas production (mL/0.2 g DM) of M. sativa and A. melanoxylon over 96 h of incubation.
Figure 2. Cumulative in vitro gas production (mL/0.2 g DM) of M. sativa and A. melanoxylon over 96 h of incubation.
Grasses 04 00037 g002
Figure 3. Chemical composition and digestibility parameters of M. sativa before and after the ensiling process (M. sativa Silage). Values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Chemical composition and digestibility parameters of M. sativa before and after the ensiling process (M. sativa Silage). Values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Grasses 04 00037 g003
Figure 4. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of M. sativa silages with increasing inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of M. sativa silages with increasing inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Grasses 04 00037 g004
Figure 5. Net energy for lactation (NEL, MJ/kg DM) and metabolizable energy (ME, MJ/kg DM) of M. sativa silage (TC) and silages with increasing inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon (T1–T4). Bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from three replicates (n = 3).
Figure 5. Net energy for lactation (NEL, MJ/kg DM) and metabolizable energy (ME, MJ/kg DM) of M. sativa silage (TC) and silages with increasing inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon (T1–T4). Bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from three replicates (n = 3).
Grasses 04 00037 g005
Figure 6. Cumulative gas production profiles during 96 h of in vitro fermentation of silages with varying A. melanoxylon inclusion levels.
Figure 6. Cumulative gas production profiles during 96 h of in vitro fermentation of silages with varying A. melanoxylon inclusion levels.
Grasses 04 00037 g006
Table 1. In vitro gas production kinetics and cumulative gas production (mL/0.2 g DM) of M. sativa and A.melanoxylon prior to ensiling.
Table 1. In vitro gas production kinetics and cumulative gas production (mL/0.2 g DM) of M. sativa and A.melanoxylon prior to ensiling.
A. melanoxylonM. sativap Value
Kinetics of Reaction
a (mL/0.2 g DM)2.46 ± 0.1242−1.6244 ± 0.20350.091
b (mL/0.2 g DM)12.36 ± 0.159539.9572 ± 0.2374<0.001
c (mL/h)0.0250 ± 0.01000.0364 ± 0.0006<0.001
Lag t (h)0.00 ± 0.001.00 ± 0.0156<0.001
Gas production (mL/0.2DM)
4 h3.33 ± 0.243.98 ± 0.150.063
8 h3.91 ± 0.038.38 ± 0.14<0.001
12 h4.64 ± 0.1112.54 ± 0.21<0.001
24 h6.35 ± 0.2621.47 ± 0.25<0.001
48 h8.92 ± 0.1231.26 ± 0.25<0.001
72 h10.95 ± 0.335.59 ± 0.17<0.001
96 h12.15 ± 0.1937.29 ± 0.15<0.001
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). “a” represents the gas produced from the immediately soluble fraction (mL/0.2 g DM), “b” is the gas production from the insoluble but fermentable fraction (mL/0.2 g DM), “c” is the rate constant of gas production (mL/h), and “Lag t” is the lag time before gas production begins (h). Differences between means were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Table 2. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of M. sativa silages with increasing levels of A. melanoxylon inclusion.
Table 2. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of M. sativa silages with increasing levels of A. melanoxylon inclusion.
ParametersTreatment
TCT1T2T3T4
DM
(%)
Mean ± SEM17.75 ± 0.0417.84 ± 0.0919.65 ± 0.3122.53 ± 0.0628.45 ± 0.11
CV (%)0.20.481.60.280.38
CP
(%DM)
Mean ± SEM22.85 ± 0.1923.45 ± 0.1521.32 ± 0.1521.31 ± 0.0519.85 ± 0.09
CV (%)0.820.620.70.220.45
NDF
(%DM)
Mean ± SEM53.94 ± 0.2053.09 ± 0.0557.95 ± 0.1358.36 ± 0.1363.12 ± 0.08
CV (%)0.370.10.220.220.13
ADF
(%DM)
Mean ± SEM35.29 ± 0.2042.08 ± 0.1148.25 ± 0.1548.70 ± 0.1753.01 ± 0.17
CV (%)0.570.250.310.360.31
ADL
(%DM)
Mean ± SEM7.48 ± 0.089.74 ± 0.059.91 ± 0.059.93 ± 0.039.98 ± 0.03
CV (%)1.010.540.530.270.27
EE
(%DM)
Mean ± SEM1.61 ± 0.152.10 ± 0.051.43 ± 0.062.25 ± 0.071.62 ± 0.12
CV (%)9.412.524.253.037.71
ASH
(%DM)
Mean ± SEM10.45 ± 0.0511.56 ± 0.2310.28 ± 0.199.35 ± 0.097.53 ± 0.07
CV (%)0.4421.830.980.87
IVDMD
(%)
Mean ± SEM62.61 ± 0.0562.50 ± 0.0656.79 ± 0.2054.36 ± 0.0748.02 ± 0.16
CV (%)0.080.10.360.130.33
IVOMD
(%)
Mean ± SEM54.14 ± 0.0453.79 ± 0.1447.99 ± 0.1245.07 ± 0.1240.61 ± 0.22
CV (%)0.060.260.250.280.54
Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), based on three replicates per treatment. DM: Dry Matter; CP: Crude Protein; NDF: Neutral Detergent Fiber; ADF: Acid Detergent Fiber; ADL: Acid Detergent Lignin; EE: Ether Extract; IVDMD: In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility; IVOMD: In Vitro Organic Matter Digestibility; CV: Coefficient of Variation. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3). Treatment pairwise differences (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05) are shown in Figure 4 for each variable.
Table 3. pH and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N % of total N) content of M. sativa silages with increasing inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon.
Table 3. pH and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N % of total N) content of M. sativa silages with increasing inclusion levels of A. melanoxylon.
ParametersTreatment
TCT1T2T3T4
pHMean ± SEM5.86 ± 0.015.72 ± 0.014.85 ± 0.014.76 ± 0.014.53 ± 0.01
CV (%)0.110.170.180.180.19
N-NH3/N (%)Mean ± SEM11.38 ± 0.109.25 ± 0.209.82 ± 0.018.76 ± 0.088.05 ± 0.10
CV (%)0.842.190.100.891.22
Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), based on three replicates per treatment. Treatment pairwise differences (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05) are shown in Figure 4 for each variable.
Table 4. Gas Production Kinetics and Cumulative Gas Volume of M. sativa Silages with Increasing Inclusion Levels of A. melanoxylon.
Table 4. Gas Production Kinetics and Cumulative Gas Volume of M. sativa Silages with Increasing Inclusion Levels of A. melanoxylon.
Treatmentp Value
TCT1T2T3T4
Kinetics of Reaction
a (mL/0.2 g DM)−1.95 ± 0.15−0.87 ± 0.08−0.15 ± 0.05−1.25 ± 0.1−0.03 ± 0.120.06
b (mL/0.2 g DM)32.72 ± 0.4828.43 ± 0.5222.97 ± 0.2325.08 ± 0.5924.72 ± 0.22<0.001
c (mL/h)0.04 ± 0.0020.02 ± 0.0020.01 ± 0.0010.03 ± 0.0020.02 ± 0.001<0.001
Lag t (h)1.67 ± 0.061.31 ± 0.050.4 ± 0.081.86 ± 0.110.12 ± 0.11<0.001
Gas Production (mL/0.2 g DM)
4 h2.75 ± 0.131.48 ± 0.121.44 ± 0.281.28 ± 0.42.18 ± 0.40.10
8 h6.65 ± 0.173.47 ± 0.233.12 ± 0.243.47 ± 0.324.17 ± 0.14<0.001
12 h10.14 ± 0.315.36 ± 0.24.52 ± 0.15.59 ± 0.135.98 ± 0.16<0.001
24 h17.76 ± 0.2610.35 ± 0.198.24 ± 0.1410.64 ± 0.0810.6 ± 0.26<0.001
48 h25.51 ± 0.0517.2 ± 0.0713.51 ± 0.116.91 ± 0.3816.58 ± 0.18<0.001
72 h28.59 ± 0.2721.26 ± 0.0417.05 ± 0.2520.32 ± 0.0920.2 ± 0.17<0.001
96 h29.74 ± 0.2623.9 ± 0.2619.07 ± 0.2121.95 ± 0.1922.04 ± 0.09<0.001
Values are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Kinetic parameters: a—gas production from the immediately soluble fraction; b—gas production from the insoluble fraction; c—gas production rate constant; Lag t—lag time before gas production begins. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dias, C.M.; Melo, V.; Nunes, H.; Borba, A. Effect of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. Inclusion on the Chemical Composition, Fermentation Dynamics, and In Vitro Digestibility of Medicago sativa L. Silage. Grasses 2025, 4, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses4030037

AMA Style

Dias CM, Melo V, Nunes H, Borba A. Effect of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. Inclusion on the Chemical Composition, Fermentation Dynamics, and In Vitro Digestibility of Medicago sativa L. Silage. Grasses. 2025; 4(3):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses4030037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dias, Cristiana Maduro, Vanessa Melo, Helder Nunes, and Alfredo Borba. 2025. "Effect of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. Inclusion on the Chemical Composition, Fermentation Dynamics, and In Vitro Digestibility of Medicago sativa L. Silage" Grasses 4, no. 3: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses4030037

APA Style

Dias, C. M., Melo, V., Nunes, H., & Borba, A. (2025). Effect of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. Inclusion on the Chemical Composition, Fermentation Dynamics, and In Vitro Digestibility of Medicago sativa L. Silage. Grasses, 4(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses4030037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop