Next Article in Journal
Myths That Persist About Orofacial Myology
Previous Article in Journal
Letter: Orthodontic Correction or Myotherapy: Which Should Come First?
 
 
International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy is published by MDPI from Volume 51 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with the previous journal publisher.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Poster 1: Rest Position of the Tongue in Infants with and Without Lingual Frenulum Alteration

by
Roberta Lopes de Castro Martinelli
1,*,
Irene Queiroz Marchesan
2 and
Giédre Berretin-Felix
3
1
Hospital Santa Therezinha, Avenida Rui Barbosa, 703, Brotas CEP17380-000, SP, Brazil
2
CEFAC, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
3
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Orofac. Myol. Myofunct. Ther. 2016, 42(1), 43-48; https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.2016.42.1.5
Submission received: 1 November 2016 / Revised: 1 November 2016 / Accepted: 1 November 2016 / Published: 1 November 2016

Abstract

:
Rest position of the infants’ tongue with and without lingual frenulum alteration is poorly reported in the literature. The present study aims to verify the rest position of the tongue in infants with and without lingual frenulum alteration. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 324 infants. While the infant was sleeping, deep sleep, the SLP, facing the baby, opened the infant’s mouth by pushing down the infant’s chin with their thumbs, and at the same time, elevated the upper lip using their index fingers. The maneuver provided the visualization of the infant’s tongue position at rest: elevated or down. The Chi-square test was used for statistical treatment of the data at 5% level of significance (p < 0.05). The variables included in the Chi-square analyses were: a) tongue elevated, b) tongue down-positioned, c) normal lingual frenulum, and d) altered lingual frenulum. The statistical analysis demonstrated that there was an association between the tongue position at rest and the characteristics of the lingual frenulum. When the lingual frenulum was altered, the infant’s tongue rest position tended to be down in the oral cavity (p < 0.001). In infants with lingual frenulum alteration, the tongue at rest tended to be down-positioned, between the gum pads. In infants with normal lingual frenulum, the tongue at rest tended to be elevated.

INTRODUCTION

The tongue is a specialized organ of taste that actively participates in sucking, chewing, swallowing, and speech (Singh & Kent, 2000; Marchesan, 2004; Camargo, Marchesan, Oliveira, Svicero, Pereira, & Madureira, 2013; Silva, Costa, Nemr, & Marchesan, 2009; Derrick, Stavness, & Gick, 2015). Infant’s sucking movements favor adequate lip closure during rest and the correction of physiological mandibular retrognathism (Serra-Negra, Pordeus, & Rocha, 1997). Moreover, these movements contribute to the correct tongue position in the central incisor palatine region, due to the tonicity acquired with the intense activity of the tongue muscles (Neiva, Cattoni, Ramos, & Issler, 2003).
Studies demonstrate the importance of tongue movements for milk extraction during breastfeeding (Geddes, Kent, Mitoulas, & Hartmann, 2008; Burton, Deng, McDonald, & Fewtrell, 2013; Elad, Koslovsky, Blum, Laine, Po, Botzer, Dollberg, Zelicovich, & Ben Sira, 2014). They also report the interference of tongue-tie when breastfeeding (Geddes, Langton, Gollow, Jacobs, Hartmann, & Simmer, 2008; Garbin, Sakalidis, Chadwick, Whan, Hartmann, & Geddes, 2013; Sethi, Smith, Kortequee, Ward, & Clarke, 2013; Henry & Hayman,2014; Martinelli, Marchesan, Gusmão, Honório, & Berretin-Felix, 2015; Ito, 2014).
There are several definitions of ankyloglossia or ‘tongue-tie’ in the literature. Some authors state that tongue-tie is manifested by an abnormally short and thick lingual frenulum (Horton, Crawford, Adamson, & Ashbell, 1969). Other authors describe tongue-tie as a congenital condition with an unusually thickened, tightened or shortened frenulum (membrane or string under the tongue) (Wallace & Clarke, 2006). Based on embryology studies, Knox (2010) states that tongue-tie occurs when a common minor embryologic tissue remnant, persistence of midline sublingual tissue that usually undergoes apoptosis during embryonic development, causes restriction of normal tongue movement.
Figure 1. Maneuver for visualization of infant’s tongue position at rest.
Figure 1. Maneuver for visualization of infant’s tongue position at rest.
Ijom 42 00043 g001
A recent study reports that tongue-tie is a known factor in altering orofacial growth, that affects the development of the maxilla due to the low placement of the tongue. It also leads to the abnormal development of a high and narrow hard palate, and secondarily, mouth breathing during sleep. These changes are said to occur early in life, as the orofacial growth is particularly fast during the first two years of life (Huang, Quo, Berkowski, & Guilleminault, 2015). Another study states that tongue-tie that is left untreated at birth is associated with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) at a later age. As a result, a systematic screening for the syndrome should be conducted when this anatomical abnormality is observed (Guilleminault, Huseni, & Lo, 2016).
The aforementioned studies have demonstrated the importance of adequate tongue rest position in the palate and disagrees with the literature that states that the newborn’s tongue rests that will be occupied by the teeth (Correa, 2010; Guedes-Pinto, Bönecker, & Rodrigues, 2009). Overall, the rest position of the tongue in infants with and without lingual frenulum alteration is poorly reported in the literature. The present study aims to verify the rest position of the tongue in infants with and without lingual frenulum alteration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 324 infants, 146 females and 178 males. The study included healthy full-term infants of both genders, 48 hours after their birth, who were being exclusively breastfed. Prematurity, perinatal complications, craniofacial anomalies, neurological disorders, and visible genetics syndromes were the exclusion criteria.
48 hours after birth, the “Neonatal Tongue Screening Test” (Martinelli, Marchesan, Lauris, Honório, Gusmão, & Berretin-Felix, 2016) from the Lingual Frenulum Protocol for Infants (Martinelli, Marchesan, & Berretin-Felix, 2013) was administered to the newborns to assess lingual frenulum. The Neonatal Tongue Screening Test (NTST) has been found to be a valid and reliable assessment tool that ensures accuracy when diagnosing lingual frenulum alterations in newborns (Martinelli, Marchesan, Lauris, Honório, Gusmão, & Berretin-Felix, 2016).
Figure 2. Infants’ tongue position at rest: (A) elevated—apex touching rugae palatinae; (B) down—between the gum pads.
Figure 2. Infants’ tongue position at rest: (A) elevated—apex touching rugae palatinae; (B) down—between the gum pads.
Ijom 42 00043 g002
All assessments were performed by only one doctored Speech-Language Pathologist, experienced in Orofacial Myofunctional Disorders. The assessments were registered in patient records and videotaped. As part of the hospital’s routine, newborns are expected to return 30 days after discharge for a new SLP assessment. All of the infants returned and were seen by the same SLP.
During sleep, it was observed that some infants had their mouths open while others had theirs closed. The SLP observed that the infants who had lingual frenulum alteration according to the NTST, administered 48 hours after birth, tended to keep their mouth open during sleep, while infants with normal lingual frenulum tended to sleep with their mouth closed.
While the infant slept, in deep sleep, the SLP faced the baby, opened the infant’s mouth by pushing down the infant’s chin with the thumbs, and at the same time, elevated the upper lip using the index fingers as shown in Figure 1.
The maneuver provided the visualization of the infant’s tongue position at rest: a) elevated—with the apex touching rugae palatinae; b) down—with the tongue between the gum pads as shown in Figure 2.
Based on the observations of the SLP, the present study was conducted to verify the relation between lingual frenulum and tongue rest position during sleep. The Chi-square test was used for statistical treatment of data at 5% level of significance (p < 0.05). The variables included in the Chi-square analyses were: a) tongue elevated position, b) tongue down-position, c) normal lingual frenulum, and d) altered lingual frenulum. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Odontology of Bauru—University of Sao Paulo under the number 48047015.1.0000.5538.

RESULTS

The statistical analysis demonstrated that there was an association between the tongue position at rest and the characteristics of the lingual frenulum. When the lingual frenulum was altered the infant’s tongue rest position tended to be down in the oral cavity (p < .001), as demonstrated in Table 1.

DISCUSSION

Rest position of the tongue in infants with and without lingual frenulum alteration is poorly reported in the literature. Two books that discussed this issue in Odontopediatrics, reported that the newborn’s tongue rests between the gum pads, filling the space that will be occupied by the teeth (Correa, 2010; Guedes-Pinto, Bönecker, & Rodrigues, 2009). However, this cross-sectional study conducted with 324 infants demonstrated that the infants’ tongue at rest might be found in either an elevated or down-positioned. Additionally, the study evidenced that the lingual frenulum does interfere with rest position of the tongue. In fact, the rest position of the tongue should be considered when assessing the lingual frenulum. The findings in the present study are in agreement with a retrospective study that reports that the down position of tongue, because of tongue-tie, may alter orofacial growth which then directly affects the development of the maxilla. The tongue tie can result in the abnormal development of a high and narrow hard palate, and thus an open mouth breathing posture during sleep. These changes can occur early in life, as the orofacial growth is particularly fast during the first two years of life (Huang, Quo, Berkowski, & Guilleminault, 2015; Guilleminault, Huseni, & Lo, 2016).
It is not possible, however, to diagnose lingual frenulum alteration based only on the tongue position at rest. A set of characteristics must be considered when diagnosing the range of the restriction of the lingual movements caused by lingual frenulum alteration (Martinelli, Marchesan, & Berretin-Felix, 2013). Diagnosing lingual frenulum alterations may be a difficult task for a health professional who has little knowledge of the anatomy of the oral cavity, including tongue anatomy, lingual frenulum, and orofacial function (Marchesan, 2010). For a correct assessment, the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA, 2005) and the International Association of Orofacial Myology (Paskay, 2006) have proposed the administration of valid assessment protocols.
Future studies aiming to assess newborn’s tongue position at rest, after frenotomy, may demonstrate the importance of revision for better tongue mobility, breastfeeding, and resting position during sleep.

CONCLUSION

In infants with lingual frenulum alteration, the tongue at rest tended to be down-positioned, between the gum pads. In infants with normal lingual frenulum, the tongue at rest tended to be elevated. Data from this study will help health professionals identify possible lingual frenulum alterations.

References

  1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Evidence-based practice in communication disorders [Position Statement]. 15 October 2005. Available online: http://www.asha.org/policy.
  2. Burton, P.; Deng, J.; McDonald, D.; Fewtrell, M.S. Real-time 3D ultrasound imaging of infant tongue movements during breastfeeding. Early Human Development 2013, 89(9), 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Camargo, Z. A.; Marchesan, I. Q.; Oliveira, L. R.; Svicero, M. A. F.; Pereira, L. C. K.; Madureira, S. Lingual frenectomy and alveolar tap production: An acoustic and perceptual study. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 2013, 38(4), 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Correa, M. S. N. Odontopediatria na primeira infância, 3 ed.; São Paulo: Santos, 2010; p. 923. [Google Scholar]
  5. Derrick, K.; Stavness, I.; Gick, B. Three speech sounds, one motor action: Evidence for speech-motor disparity from English flap production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2015, 137(3), 1493–1502. [Google Scholar]
  6. Elad, D.; Koslovsky, P.; Blum, O.; Laine, A. F.; Po, M. J.; Botzer, E.; Dollberg, S.; Zelicovich, M.; Ben Sira, L. Biomechanics of milk extraction during breastfeeding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2014, 111(14), 5230–5235. [Google Scholar]
  7. Garbin, C. P.; Sakalidis, V. S.; Chadwick, L. M.; Whan, E.; Hartmann, P. E.; Geddes, D. T. Evidence of improved milk intake after frenotomy: A case report. Pediatrics 2013, 132(5), 1413–1417. [Google Scholar]
  8. Geddes, D. T.; Langton, D. B.; Gollow, I.; Jacobs, L. A.; Hartmann, P. E.; Simmer, K. Frenulotomy for breastfeeding infants with ankyloglossia: Effect on milk removal and sucking mechanism as imaged by ultrasound. Pediatrics 2008, 122(1), 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Geddes, D. T.; Kent, J. C.; Mitoulas, L. R.; Hartmann, P. E. Tongue movement and intra-oral vacuum in breastfeeding infants. Early Human Development 2008, 84(7), 471–477. [Google Scholar]
  10. Guedes-Pinto, A. C.; Bönecker, M.; Rodrigues, C. R. M. D. Odontopediatria—Fundamentos de odontologia, 1st ed.; Santos-GEN, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Guilleminault, C.; Huseni, S.; Lo, L. A frequent phenotype for paediatric sleep apnoea: Short lingual frenulum. ERJ Open Research 2016, 00043-2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Henry, L.; Hayman, R. Ankyloglossia its impact breastfeeding. Nursing for Women’s Health 2014, 18(2), 122–129. [Google Scholar]
  13. Horton, C. E.; Crawford, H. H.; Adamson, J. E.; Ashbell, T. S. Tongue-tie. Cleft Palate Journal 1969, 6, 8–23. [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang, Y.; Quo, S.; Berkowski, J. A.; Guilleminault, C. Short lingual frenulum and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children. International Journal of Pediatric Research 2015, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Knox, I. Tongue Tie and Frenotomy in the Breastfeeding Newborn. NeoReviews 2010, 11(9), 513–519. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ito, Y. Does frenotomy improve breast-feeding difficulties in infants with ankyloglossia? Pediatrics International 2014, 56(4), 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Marchesan, I. Q. Lingual Frenulum: Classification and speech interference. International Journal of Orofacial Myology 2004, 30, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marchesan, I. Q. Protocolo de Avaliação do frênulo da língua. Revista CEFAC 2010, 12(6), 977–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martinelli, R. L. C.; Marchesan, I. Q.; Berretin-Felix, G. Protocolo de avaliação do frênulo lingual para bebês: relação entre aspectos anatômicos e funcionais. Revista CEFAC 2013, 15(3), 599–610. [Google Scholar]
  20. Martinelli, R. L. C.; Marchesan, I. Q.; Gusmão, R. J.; Honório, H. M.; Berretin-Felix, G. The effects of frenotomy on breastfeeding. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2015, 23(2), 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martinelli, R. L. C.; Marchesan, I. Q.; Lauris, J. R.; Honório, H. M.; Gusmão, R. J.; Berretin-Felix, G. Validity and reliability of the neonatal tongue screening test. Revista CEFAC 2016, 18(6), 1323–1331. [Google Scholar]
  22. Neiva, F. C.; Cattoni, D. M.; Ramos, J. L.; Issler, H. Desmame precoce: Implicações para o desenvolvimento motor-oral. Jornal de Pediatria 2003, 79, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Paskay, L. C. Instrumentation and measurement procedures in orofacial myology. International Journal of Orofacial Myology 2006, 32, 37–57. [Google Scholar]
  24. Serra-Negra, J. M. C.; Pordeus, I. A.; Rocha, J. F., Jr. Estudo da associação entre aleitamento, hábitos bucais e maloclusões. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo 1997, 11, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sethi, N.; Smith, D.; Kortequee, S.; Ward, V. M.; Clarke, S. Benefits of frenulotomy in infants with ankyloglossia. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngoly 2013, 77(5), 762–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Silva, M. C.; Costa, M. L. V. C. M.; Nemr, K.; Marchesan, I. Q. Frênulo de língua alterado e interferência na mastigação. Revista CEFAC 2009, 11(Suppl 3), 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, S.; Kent, R. D. Dictionary of Speech-Language Pathology; Singular’s, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wallace, H.; Clarke, S. Tongue tie division in infants with breastfeeding difficulties. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2006, 70(7), 1257–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Relation between lingual frenulum and tongue rest position.
Table 1. Relation between lingual frenulum and tongue rest position.
Ijom 42 00043 i001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martinelli, R.L.d.C.; Marchesan, I.Q.; Berretin-Felix, G. Poster 1: Rest Position of the Tongue in Infants with and Without Lingual Frenulum Alteration. Int. J. Orofac. Myol. Myofunct. Ther. 2016, 42, 43-48. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.2016.42.1.5

AMA Style

Martinelli RLdC, Marchesan IQ, Berretin-Felix G. Poster 1: Rest Position of the Tongue in Infants with and Without Lingual Frenulum Alteration. International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy. 2016; 42(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.2016.42.1.5

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martinelli, Roberta Lopes de Castro, Irene Queiroz Marchesan, and Giédre Berretin-Felix. 2016. "Poster 1: Rest Position of the Tongue in Infants with and Without Lingual Frenulum Alteration" International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy 42, no. 1: 43-48. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.2016.42.1.5

APA Style

Martinelli, R. L. d. C., Marchesan, I. Q., & Berretin-Felix, G. (2016). Poster 1: Rest Position of the Tongue in Infants with and Without Lingual Frenulum Alteration. International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy, 42(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.2016.42.1.5

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop