Previous Article in Journal
Superconducting Quantum Sensors for Fundamental Physics Searches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Progress in GrAHal-CAPP/DMAG for Axion Dark Matter Search in the 1–3 μeV Range †

by
Pierre Pugnat
1,*,
Rafik Ballou
2,
Philippe Camus
2,
Guillaume Donnier-Valentin
2,
Thierry Grenet
2,
Ohjoon Kwon
3,
Jérôme Lacipière
2,
Mickaël Pelloux
1,
Rolf Pfister
1,
Yannis K. Semertzidis
4,
Arthur Talarmin
2,
Jérémy Vessaire
2 and
SungWoo Youn
3
1
Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses (LNCMI), European Magnetic Field Laboratory (EMFL), Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, 38000 Grenoble, France
2
Institut Néel, Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, 38000 Grenoble, France
3
Dark Matter Axion Group, ex-CAPP (DMAG), Institute of Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon 34051, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at 19th Patras workshop on axions, WMPs and WISPs, with the occasion of the 80th birthday of Professor Konstantin Zioutas, Patras, Greece, 15–20 September 2024.
Phys. Sci. Forum 2025, 11(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2025011003
Published: 24 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 19th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs)

Abstract

Two outstanding problems of particle physics and cosmology, namely the strong-CP problem and the nature of dark matter, can be solved with the discovery of a single new particle, the axion. The modular high magnetic field and flux hybrid magnet platform of LNCMI-Grenoble, which was recently put in operation up to 42 T, offers unique opportunities for axion/axion-like particle search using Sikivie-type haloscopes. In this paper, the focus will be on the 350–600 MHz frequency range corresponding to the 1–3 μeV axion mass range requiring a large-bore RF-cavity. It will be built by DMAG and integrated within the large-bore superconducting hybrid magnet outsert, providing a central magnetic field up to 9 T in 812 mm warm bore diameter. The progress achieved by Néel Institute in the design of the complex cryostat with its double dilution refrigerators to cooldown below 50 mK the ultra-light Cu RF-cavity of 650 mm inner diameter and the first stage of the RF measurement chain are presented. Perspectives for the targeted sensitivity, assuming less than 2-year integration time, are recalled.

1. Introduction

Axion was predicted independently by S. Weinberg [1] and F. Wilczek [2] from the Peccei and Quin [3] symmetry breaking and constitutes one of the most attractive solutions to the strong-CP problem [4,5], one of the remaining sand grains in the gear of the standard model of particle physics. Moreover, string theory naturally contains a large number of axions or axion-like particles (ALPs), which serve as a basic underlying feature [5,6]. Interest in the search for axions/ALP extends beyond particle physics, since such a hypothetical light spin-zero particle is a serious candidate for cold dark matter [7,8,9,10] and one of the rare non-supersymmetric ones; in this context, no signature for supersymmetry has been observed to date at the LHC or in underground experiments [11]. Furthermore, axion or ALPs could explain several astronomical issues, such as the universe’s transparency to very-high-energy photons (>100 GeV) [12], anomalous white dwarf cooling [13], and gamma ray excesses in galaxy clusters [14].
In 1983, Pierre Sikivie demonstrated that if the cold dark matter of our galaxy halo consists of “invisible” axions, they can be detected in the laboratory through their conversion to nearly monochromatic photons in a haloscope, i.e., a microwave cavity immerged in a strong magnetic field [15]. Assuming the validity of the Dick radiometer equation [16], the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of a haloscope can be written as follows:
SNR = (P/kBTsyst)(Δt/Δν)1/2
where P is the detection power awaited to be around 10−21–10−24 W depending of the frequency range, kB is the Boltzmann constant, Tsyst = T + TN, i.e., the sum of the physical temperature T and the intrinsic amplifier noise temperature TN, Δt is the time integration, and Δν is the amplifier frequency bandwidth. The detection power P scales as B2V Q, i.e., the square of the magnetic field multiplied by the volume of the RF-cavity and its quality factor Q. The resonant conversion condition is obtained when the frequency of the cavity is equal to the unknown axion mA, i.e., hν = mA c2 [1 + O(β·2)/2], where β ≈ 10−3 is the galactic virial velocity, and h and c are the Planck constant and the speed of light in vacuum, respectively. The search for axions is performed by tuning the cavity frequency in small overlapping steps. The main figure of merits of haloscopes given by (1) are B2V and Tsyst, requiring developments of high-field magnets and operation at ultra-low temperature, i.e., down to few tens of mK, combined with the use of microwave cavity with Q ≈ 105–106 and ultra-low noise amplifier working possibly down to the quantum limit. In this framework, the GrAHal-DMAG collaboration gathers key expertise with high magnetic field provided by LNCMI-Grenoble, ultra-low temperature cryostat made by Institut Néel (Grenoble, France), and large-bore ultra-light Cu RF-cavities developed by DMAG (ex. CAPP) [17]. This paper focuses on the progress made in the production of high-DC magnetic fields and in the design of a large-volume, low-temperature cryostat.

2. The Modular Grenoble Hybrid Magnet Platform of LNCMI

The highest DC magnetic fields are produced today with hybrid magnets, i.e., magnets combining resistive and superconducting technologies. The Grenoble hybrid magnet is composed of Cu-Ag resistive inserts made of polyhelices [18] and Bitter coils [19] surrounded by a large-bore Nb-Ti/Cu superconducting solenoid (Figure 1). Its unique feature is to be modular, with the multiple configurations listed in Table 1, which were recently successfully commissioned, with a maximum field of 42 T reached as a first step for the “full” hybrid magnet configuration [20]. The details of the high electric power installation as well as the cryogenic infrastructure needed to operate such a hybrid magnet are reported in [21] (see also Supplementary Materials).
All hybrid magnet configurations listed in Table 1 can, in principle, be equipped with RF-cavities of different diameters, allowing several axion mass ranges to be probed [22].

3. Haloscope Cryostat for Cooling the Cu RF-Cavity and First-Stage RF-Amplification

3.1. Generalities

The overall cryogenic system is too specific to be procured by external companies, requiring dedicated in-house developments. The cryostat will house two dilution refrigerators (DR1 and DR2); the first one is for cooling the large lightweight Cu RF-cavity down to 50 mK and the second one is for cooling the first RF amplification stage inside the compensation coil (Figure 2) below 100 mK. The cooling requirements of DR1 and DR2 are listed in Table 2 and are well within the capabilities of classical systems, but they require a specific cryogenic environment.
The technical choice for the GrAHal cryostat is based on the dry approach, avoiding the use of cryogenic liquids and relying on a powerful pulse tube cryocooler for long-time operation in stable conditions. Several improvements with respect to the previous conceptual study [17] were driven by detailed studies and are reported in this paper together with solved integration issues within the Grenoble hybrid magnet. All other parts, namely the large-bore ultra-light RF-cavity in Cu and the RF-detection chain, remain unchanged.

3.2. Main Changes and Improvements

3.2.1. Removal of the Lower Part of the 300 K Shield

Because of the integration constraints of the cryostat within the hybrid magnet structure (Figure 1) and keeping the diameter of the light Cu RF-cavity as large as possible to probe the axion mass range down to about 1 μeV, we decided to remove the lower part of the 300 K shield of the cryostat and use, for this purpose, the 300 K inner bore tube of 812 mm diameter of the hybrid magnet structure (Figure 2). This new design makes it necessary to guarantee the leak tightness between the external parts of the 50–30 K shield of the cryostat and the inner bore tube of the hybrid magnet, which comprises several interfaces, including the upper water box one. Dedicated tests will be conducted to validate this point. The targeted inner diameter of the Cu RF-cavity is now fixed to 650 mm.

3.2.2. 50–30 K Actively Cooled Shield with Its Cooling Loop System

The intermediate temperature shield requires an active cooling loop (Figure 3) and multilayer insulation separated by vacuum space to intercept radiative loads. The cooling loop will be couple to a powerful cryocooler (AL630 100W@20 K or AL325 100W@25 K). This overall subsystem is independent of other parts of the cryostat and is fully funded. It will provide a configuration for making first RF-cavity tests in 9 T magnetic field at LNCMI and possibly preliminary axion search run at T < 50 K.

3.2.3. Cryogenic Link and JT2K System

The 4 K thermal shield needs to intercept the radiative loads from the 50 to 30 K shield. For this, an innovative solution has been proposed based on the use of a superfluid helium (HeII) loop to provide the heat sink. Instead of building a JT4K cooler (Joule–Thomson cooler at 4 K) and a conductive link for the 2 K shield, a JT2K cooler (lower suction pressure) will be implemented with a piping network filled with HeII. This SUPERLINK concept (Figure 4) is based on the fact that the thermal conductivity of HeII is about 1000 times that of Cu OFHC at the same temperature. The cooling power needed for GrAHal is estimated to be around 2 W. A prototype SUPERLINK system is presently under development to validate the concept, keeping as a backup solution the use of a JT4K with a circulation on the radiative protection shield similar to the one of the 50–30 K shield.

4. Targeted Sensitivities Versus Frequency Range

The reduction in the inner diameter of the Cu RF-cavity of about 7% with respect to the previous conceptual study [17] will increase the lowest targeted frequency up to 353 MHz. Efforts will be devoted on decreasing this lower frequency by using, for example, several tuning rods and/or dielectrical ones.
Concerning the targeted sensitivities, an axion search running phase with the 50–30 K sub-cryostat alone is under evaluation as a preliminary step. It will be followed by both operation phases already described in [17], the first one with DR1 alone and the second one with DR1 and DR2 to implement the quantum amplifier (SQUID) for the first RF amplification stage. With the scan rate conservatively estimated to be around 0.5 MHz/day at DFSZ sensitivity, the range 353–600 MHz can be covered in less than 2 years of integration time.

Supplementary Materials

A virtual tour of the LNCMI-Grenoble to visualize the hybrid magnet experimental site can be found at https://storage.net-fs.com/hosting/6174450/20/ (accessed on 10 October 2025). Follow the link Hybrid magnet site M8 in the header RESISTIVE MAGNETS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.P., P.C., T.G. and J.V.; methodology, P.P., R.B., P.C., T.G., O.K. and J.V.; software, R.B. and J.L.; validation, P.P., P.C., T.G., G.D.-V., S.Y. and Y.K.S.; formal analysis, P.P., R.B., P.C., T.G. and O.K.; investigation, R.B., M.P., R.P. and A.T.; resources, P.P., T.G., S.Y. and Y.K.S.; data curation, R.B., T.G. and A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, P.P.; writing—review and editing, P.P.; visualization, P.P.; supervision, P.P., R.B., T.G., S.Y. and Y.K.S.; project administration, P.P., T.G., S.Y. and Y.K.S.; funding acquisition, P.P., T.G., S.Y. and Y.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The large-bore superconducting magnet with its cryogenic plant, power supply and magnet protection system were funded by Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, French Ministry of Higher Education and Research in the framework of “Investissements pour l’avenir” Equipex LaSUP (Large Super-conducting User Platform), European Funds for Regional Development (FEDER) and Rhône-Alpes region. This work was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR) in the framework of the GrAHal project (ANR-22-CE31-0025), the 2022 Rare Events program of MITI-CNRS, the CRYONEXT CEA-CNRS program (FRANCE 2030) and the LabEx QuantAlps SUPERLINK, which is supported by the ANR in the framework of the “Investissements d’avenir” program attributed to Université Grenoble Alpes (ANR-15-IDEX-02).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No unpublished research data were produced at that time.

Acknowledgments

Pierre Pugnat and Rafik Ballou, members of the OSQAR collaboration, would like to express their acknowledgements to Konstantin Zioutas and wish him a happy 80th birthday. They treasure Konstantin’s encouragements and support for OSQAR’s pioneering axion/ALPs search at CERN as a complementary approach to CAST at the beginning of the 21st century, a not-so-easy period, with most of the CERN resources affected to the LHC. As it was said by Konstantin lately, we have now moved from axion phobia to axion euphoria.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ALP(s)Axion like particle(s)
CPCharge parity symmetry
CuCopper
DFSZDine–Fischler–Srednicki–Zhitnitskii limit
DMAGDark Matter search Axion Group
DR1/2Dilution refrigerator 1/2
GrAHalGrenoble Axion Haloscopes
HeIISuperfluid helium
JT2K/4KJoule–Thomson 2K/4K cooling system
LHCLarge Hadron Collider
SQUIDSuperconducting Quantum Interference Device

References

  1. Weinberg, S. A New Light Boson? Phys. Rev. Lett. 1978, 40, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wilczek, F. Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1978, 40, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peccei, R.-D.; Quinn, H.-R. CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1977, 38, 1440–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Svrek, P.; Witten, E. Axions in String Theory. J. High Energy Phys. 2006, 2006, 051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, J.-E. Weak-Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1979, 43, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cicoli, M.; Goodsell, M.; Ringwald, A. The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology. J. High Energy Phys. 2012, 2012, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abbott, L.-F.; Sikivie, P. A cosmological bound on the invisible axion. Phys. Lett. B 1983, 120, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bradley, R.; Clarke, J.; Kinion, D.; Rosenberg, L.J.; van Bibber, K.; Matsuki, S.; Mück, M.; Sikivie, P. Microwave cavity searches for dark-matter axions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2003, 75, 777–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arias, P.; Cadamuro, D.; Goodsell, M.; Jaeckel, J.; Redondo, J.; Ringwald, A. WISPy cold dark matter. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012, 6, 013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ringwald, A. Exploring the Role of Axions and Other WISPs in the Dark Universe. Dark Universe 2012, 1, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Navas, S.; Amsler, C.; Gutsche, T.; Hanhart, C.; Hernández-Rey, J.J.; Lourenço, C.; Masoni, A.; Mikhasenko, M.; Mitchell, R.E.; Patrignani, C.; et al. (Particle Data Group). The Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 110, 030001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meyer, M.; Horns, D.; Raue, M. First lower limits on the photon-axion-like particle coupling from very high energy gamma-ray observations. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 035027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Miller Bertolami, M.-M.; Melendez, B.E.; Althaus, L.G.; Isern, J. Revisiting the axion bounds from the Galactic white dwarf luminosity function. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014, 10, 069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cicoli, M.; Conlon, J.-P.; Marsh, M.-C.-D.; Rummel, M.A. 3.55 keV Photon Line and its Morphology from a 3.55 keV ALP Line. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 023540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sikivie, P. Experimental Tests of the “Invisible” Axion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51, 1415, Erratum in Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 52, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dicke, R.-H. The Measurement of Thermal Radiation at Microwave Frequencies. Rev. Sci. Inst. 1946, 17, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pugnat, P.; Camus, P.; Kwon, O.; Ballou, R.; Bruyère, C.; Byun, H.; Chung, W.; Grenet, T.; Perrier, P.; Semertzidis, Y.K.; et al. GrAHal-CAPP for axion dark matter search with unprecedented sensitivity in the 1–3 μeV mass range. Front. Phys. 2024, 12, 1358810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schneider-Muntau, H.J. Polyhelix magnets. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1981, 17, 1775–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bitter, F. The Design of powerful electromagnets part II. The magnetizing coil. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1936, 7, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pugnat, P.; Abir, H.; Barbier, R.; Berriaud, C.; Debray, F.; Grandclément, C.; Hervieu, B.; Juster, F.P.; Krämer, S.; Krupko, Y.; et al. The Grenoble Hybrid Magnet Reached 42 T as a First Step. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2025; submitted for publication. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pugnat, P.; Barbier, R.; Debray, F.; Grandclément, C.; Krämer, S.; Molinié, F.; Pfister, R.; Ronayette, L.; Vincent, B.; Simon, C. The Grenoble Hybrid Magnet: From Commissioning to First Operation up to 42 T. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2025; submitted for publication. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grenet, T.; Ballou, R.; Basto, Q.; Martineau, K.; Perrier, P.; Pugnat, P.; Quevillon, J.; Roch, N.; Smith, C. The Grenoble Axion Haloscope platform (GrAHal): Development plan and first results. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.14406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Exploded view of the Grenoble hybrid magnet with an image in the inset. The height is about 5.4 m with a total weight of 53 tons, including the cold mass at 1.8 K of 24 tons.
Figure 1. Exploded view of the Grenoble hybrid magnet with an image in the inset. The height is about 5.4 m with a total weight of 53 tons, including the cold mass at 1.8 K of 24 tons.
Psf 11 00003 g001
Figure 2. New architecture of the GrAHal-DMAG/CAPP cryostat inserted inside the 9 T/812 mm configuration of the Grenoble hybrid magnet.
Figure 2. New architecture of the GrAHal-DMAG/CAPP cryostat inserted inside the 9 T/812 mm configuration of the Grenoble hybrid magnet.
Psf 11 00003 g002
Figure 3. Principle of the active cooling loop for the 50–30 K shield.
Figure 3. Principle of the active cooling loop for the 50–30 K shield.
Psf 11 00003 g003
Figure 4. SUPERLINK concept as proposed by P.C. and J.V with the heat exchanger on the right side obtained from additive manufacturing (3D NewShape factory).
Figure 4. SUPERLINK concept as proposed by P.C. and J.V with the heat exchanger on the right side obtained from additive manufacturing (3D NewShape factory).
Psf 11 00003 g004
Table 1. High magnetic field and flux configuration of the Grenoble hybrid magnet.
Table 1. High magnetic field and flux configuration of the Grenoble hybrid magnet.
Field in T
(Nominal Field)
Warm dia. in mmGrenoble Hybrid Magnet
Configurations
Electrical Power in MW 2
42 (43) 13414 helix + 2 Bitter + superc.20.7 + 2.8 + 0.4
34 (35)3414 helix + superc.10.6 + 1.1 + 0.4
17.3 (17.5)3752 Bitter + superc.10.9 + 1.1 + 0.4
8.5 (9.5)812Superc. alone0.4 3
1 Magnetic field reached are indicated without parenthesis; 42 T = 25 T + 8.5 T + 8.5 T, 2 including magnet powering, water cooling pumps, and cryogenics, respectively. 3 Power needed for cryogenics, including He liquefier, 1.8 K pumps, and cryoplant ancillaries.
Table 2. Cooling requirements for the dilution refrigerator systems DR1 and DR2.
Table 2. Cooling requirements for the dilution refrigerator systems DR1 and DR2.
DR IdVolume (m3)Cooling Requirements (μW)T (mK)
DR10.4667550
DR20.00850100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pugnat, P.; Ballou, R.; Camus, P.; Donnier-Valentin, G.; Grenet, T.; Kwon, O.; Lacipière, J.; Pelloux, M.; Pfister, R.; Semertzidis, Y.K.; et al. Progress in GrAHal-CAPP/DMAG for Axion Dark Matter Search in the 1–3 μeV Range. Phys. Sci. Forum 2025, 11, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2025011003

AMA Style

Pugnat P, Ballou R, Camus P, Donnier-Valentin G, Grenet T, Kwon O, Lacipière J, Pelloux M, Pfister R, Semertzidis YK, et al. Progress in GrAHal-CAPP/DMAG for Axion Dark Matter Search in the 1–3 μeV Range. Physical Sciences Forum. 2025; 11(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2025011003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pugnat, Pierre, Rafik Ballou, Philippe Camus, Guillaume Donnier-Valentin, Thierry Grenet, Ohjoon Kwon, Jérôme Lacipière, Mickaël Pelloux, Rolf Pfister, Yannis K. Semertzidis, and et al. 2025. "Progress in GrAHal-CAPP/DMAG for Axion Dark Matter Search in the 1–3 μeV Range" Physical Sciences Forum 11, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2025011003

APA Style

Pugnat, P., Ballou, R., Camus, P., Donnier-Valentin, G., Grenet, T., Kwon, O., Lacipière, J., Pelloux, M., Pfister, R., Semertzidis, Y. K., Talarmin, A., Vessaire, J., & Youn, S. (2025). Progress in GrAHal-CAPP/DMAG for Axion Dark Matter Search in the 1–3 μeV Range. Physical Sciences Forum, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2025011003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop