Using Edible Insects in the Production of Cookies, Biscuits, and Crackers: A Review †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Effects of Using Edible Insects on the Nutritional Values and Technological Properties of Cookies, Biscuits, and Crackers
3. Effects of Using Edible Insects on the Sensory Properties of Cookies, Biscuits, and Crackers, and Their Consumer Acceptance
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture—Trends and Challenges; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Patel, S.; Suleria, H.A.R.; Rauf, A. Edible insects as innovative foods: Nutritional and functional assessments. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Carvalho, N.M.; Madureira, A.R.; Pintado, M.E. The potential of insects as food sources—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3642–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Huis, A. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58, 563–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, C.; Yang, D.; Liao, H.; Sun, H.; Liu, C.; Wei, L.; Li, F. Edible insects as a food source: A review. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2019, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kouřimská, L.; Adámková, A. Nutritional and sensory quality of edible insects. NFS J. 2016, 4, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- European Union. EUR-Lex-32021R0882. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R0882 (accessed on 12 May 2022).
- International Platform of Insects for Food and Feed (IPIFF). Edible Insects on the European Market. Available online: https://ipiff.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/10-06-2020-IPIFF-edible-insects-market-factsheet.pdf (accessed on 18 August 2021).
- Biró, B.; Sipos, M.A.; Kovács, A.; Badak-Kerti, K.; Pásztor-Huszár, K.; Gere, A. Cricket-enriched oat biscuit: Technological analysis and sensory evaluation. Foods 2020, 9, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheseto, X.; Baleba, S.B.S.; Tanga, C.M.; Kelemu, S.; Torto, B. Chemistry and sensory characterization of a bakery product prepared with oils from African edible insects. Foods 2020, 9, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akullo, J.; Nakimbugwe, D.; Obaa, B.B.; Okwee-Acai, J.; Agea, J.G. Development and quality evaluation of crackers enriched with edible insects. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 1592–1599. [Google Scholar]
- Awabusuyi, T.D.; Siwela, M.; Pillay, K. Sorghum–insect composites for healthier cookies: Nutritional, functional, and technological evaluation temitope. Foods 2020, 9, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niaba, K.P.V.; Brou, K.; Gbassi, K.G.; Amani, T.; Kone, N.; Gnakri, D. Quality characteristics of biscuits made from sorghum and defatted Macrotermes subhyalinus. Int. J. Biosci. 2013, 3, 58–69. [Google Scholar]
- Niaba, K.P.V.; Gbassi, K.G.; Beugre, A.G.; Amani, T.; Malan, K.A.; Gnakri, D. Nutritional and sensory qualities of wheat biscuits fortified with defatted Macrotermes subhyalinus. Int. J. Chem. Technol. 2013, 3, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
- Ogunlakin, G.O.; Oni, V.T.; Olaniyan, S.A. Quality Evaluation of Biscuit Fortified with Edible Termite (Macrotermes nigeriensis). Asian J. Biotechnol. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewi, T.; Vidiarti, A.N.; Fitranti, D.Y.; Kurniawati, D.M.; Anjani, G. Formulation of baby biscuits with substitution of wood grasshopper flour (Melanoplus cinereus) as an alternative complementary food for children. Food Res. 2020, 4, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akande, A.O.; Jolayemi, O.S.; Adelugba, V.A.; Akande, S.T. Silkworm pupae (Bombyx mori) and locusts as alternative protein sources for high-energy biscuits. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2020, 23, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zielińska, E.; Pankiewicz, U. Characteristics of Shortcake Biscuits Enriched with. Molecules 2020, 25, 5629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayensu, J.; Lutterodt, H.; Annan, R.A.; Edusei, A.; Loh, S.P. Nutritional composition and acceptability of biscuits fortified with palm weevil larvae (Rhynchophorus phoenicis Fabricius) and orange-fleshed sweet potato among pregnant women. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 1807–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mishyna, M.; Haber, M.; Benjamin, O.; Martinez, J.J.I.; Chen, J. Drying methods differentially alter volatile profiles of edible locusts and silkworms. J. Insects Food Feed 2020, 6, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishyna, M.; Chen, J.; Benjamin, O. Sensory attributes of edible insects and insect-based foods—Future outlooks for enhancing consumer appeal. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skotnicka, M.; Karwowska, K.; Kłobukowski, F.; Borkowska, A.; Pieszko, M. Possibilities of the development of edible insect-based foods in Europe. Foods 2021, 10, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro Delgado, M.; Chambers, E.; Carbonell-Barrachina, A.; Noguera Artiaga, L.; Vidal Quintanar, R.; Burgos Hernandez, A. Consumer acceptability in the USA, Mexico, and Spain of chocolate chip cookies made with partial insect powder replacement. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 1621–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awobusuyi, T.D.; Pillay, K.; Siwela, M. Consumer acceptance of biscuits supplemented with a sorghum–insect meal. Nutrients 2020, 12, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Homann, A.M.; Ayieko, M.A.; Konyole, S.O.; Roos, N. Acceptability of biscuits containing 10% cricket (Acheta domesticus) compared to milk biscuits among 5-10-year-old Kenyan schoolchildren. J. Insects Food Feed 2017, 3, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bakery Product | Edible Insect | Usage Ratio | Results | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Biscuit | Mulberry silkworm pupae (Bombyx mori), Locust | 15% a | Weight ↓, width ↑: silkworm; ↔: locust, thickness ↑, spread ratio ↓, sensory properties ↔ (except aroma) | [17] |
Biscuit | Termite (Macrotermes subhyalinus) | 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25% b | Weight ↓, diameter ↑ (except 5% inclusion), thickness ↓, spread ratio ↑, specific volume ↔, sensory properties ↔ | [13] |
Biscuit | Termite (Macrotermes nigeriensis) | 5, 10, 15, and 20% b | Weight ↑; diameter ↑ (except 5% inclusion); spread ratio ↑; breaking strength ↓; sensory properties: taste ↓, aroma ↔, texture ↔, overall acceptability ↓ (except 5% inclusion) | [15] |
Shortcake biscuit | Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) | 1:9, 1:14, 1:19 c | Diameter ↔, thickness ↔ (except 1:9 inclusion), spread ratio ↔ (except 1:9 inclusion), L* ↓, a* ↑, b*↓, Browning index ↑ | [18] |
Biscuit | Cricket (Acheta domesticus) | 5, 10, and 15% b | Color: L* ↓, a* ↑, b* ↓; texture: hardness ↔; sensory properties: odor ↔, flavor ↓ (except 5% inclusion), color ↓ (except 5% inclusion), texture ↔, overall liking ↓ | [9] |
Biscuit | Termite (Macrotermes subhyalinus) | 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25% b | Weight ↓, diameter ↑, thickness ↓, spread ratio ↑, specific volume ↓, sensory properties: taste ↔ (except 25% inclusion), aroma ↔, color ↓, texture ↔ (except 20 and 25% inclusion), appearance ↔, overall acceptability ↔ | [14] |
Baby biscuit | Grasshopper (Melanoplus cinereus) | 5, 7, and 10% a, b | Sensory properties: taste ↑, aroma ↑, color ↑, texture ↑ | [16] |
Cookie | Termite (Macrotermes belliscosus) | 5, 10, and 15% b | Weight ↓; diameter ↓; thickness ↑ (except 5% inclusion); spread factor ↓; color: L* ↓, a* ↑, b* ↑; texture: hardness ↓, fracturability ↑ | [12] |
Cracker | Cricket, termites (soldier termite, winged termite) | 8% b | Sensory properties: taste ↓, flavor ↓, aroma ↓, color ↓, appearance ↓, overall acceptability ↓ | [11] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yazici, G.N.; Ozer, M.S. Using Edible Insects in the Production of Cookies, Biscuits, and Crackers: A Review. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 6, 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10974
Yazici GN, Ozer MS. Using Edible Insects in the Production of Cookies, Biscuits, and Crackers: A Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 6(1):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10974
Chicago/Turabian StyleYazici, Gamze Nil, and Mehmet Sertac Ozer. 2021. "Using Edible Insects in the Production of Cookies, Biscuits, and Crackers: A Review" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 6, no. 1: 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10974
APA StyleYazici, G. N., & Ozer, M. S. (2021). Using Edible Insects in the Production of Cookies, Biscuits, and Crackers: A Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 6(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10974