Next Article in Journal
Exogenous Nitric Oxide Promotes Growth and Enhances Tolerance against Drought Stress in Banana
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Rhizobium Inoculation on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Yield in Protected Crops
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Knowledge, and Practice of Home-Based Food Handlers in Hulu Selangor, Malaysia Regarding Food Safety †

by
Farah Jasmina Mohamad Fauzi
1 and
Noor Azira Abdul-Mutalib
1,2,*
1
Department of Food Service and Management, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia
2
Laboratory of Food Safety and Food Integrity, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Foods—“Future Foods and Food Technologies for a Sustainable World”, 15–30 October 2021; Available online: https://foods2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 6(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10930
Published: 13 October 2021

Abstract

:
Food operators have been known as one of the sources of foodborne diseases in many food establishments. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an increase in online food businesses. This study aims to assess the level of food safety knowledge and practice of home-based food handlers in Hulu Selangor, Malaysia, and their association with the food handlers’ socio-demographic characteristics. Data were collected online among 100 home-based food handlers using a non-experimental quantitative method. Results have shown that the level of home-based food handlers’ knowledge and practice was high, with a mean percentage score (SD) of 97.50% (10.02) and 96.05% (7.92), respectively. The study found that knowledge was significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with experience, typhoid injection and attending a food safety course, whereas practice was significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with education level, income, and age. Overall, this study also found that level of knowledge was significantly correlated with practice (p < 0.05).

1. Introduction

Foodborne disease is one of the rising global public health concerns that contributes to substantial morbidity, mortality, and economic costs [1]. Foodborne diseases include a wide variety of diseases, including microbial infectious diseases and toxic diseases, primarily caused by chemical agents and toxic agents. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many food handlers have to operate from home and move to online orders [2,3].
In knowledge-attitude-practice models, knowledge (K) is considered to be the precursor that affects the practice of a person (P) and the observations contribute to a change in attitude (A), and thus, a change in behavior [4]. Based on the Food Hygiene (PPKM) Regulations 2009, the Minister of Health Malaysia (MOH) has made it mandatory for all food handlers to undergo food handler training [5]. Other than that, the Food Act, 1983, and the Disease Control Act, 1988, stated that all food handlers must obtain a typhoid injection [6]. While food hygiene training programs provided the participants with exposure and improved KAP of food safety, this did not always result in positive changes in food handling behavior [7,8].
Therefore, due to the increased number of home-based food handlers in the foodservice sector and the effect on the overall health status of the public, it is highly important to measure the extent of food safety expertise, especially for home-based food handlers. This study determines the relationship between food safety knowledge, and practice among home-based food handlers with their socio-demographic characteristics. The impact of this study can create an awareness of KAP on food safety among home-based food handlers. Knowledge positively influences an individual’s attitude, which in turn influences practices or behavior, according to the KAP model. Essentially, food handlers’ safety knowledge influences their attitudes and, as a result, their personal cleanliness, kitchen hygiene, and disease control procedures.
For the most part, foodborne diseases are affected by poor management of the cleanliness of food handlers. Foodborne diseases are more likely to happen because of insufficient knowledge, attitude, and practice among food handlers in food safety [9]. The human commitment to food contamination is thus stressed, in particular, because of the existence of dubious suppliers of raw materials, deceptive food handlers, and unhygienic premises and facilities, and inappropriate food preparation procedures [10]. The increased number of cases of foodborne disease reflects that this is a public health problem that warrants the need to decrease the number of cases through a better awareness of food hygiene. The emphasis is on the need for improving knowledge, attitude, and the practice of home-based food handlers in food safety as a notable way to minimize the impact of foodborne disease [11].
Therefore, the objectives of this study were to assess food safety knowledge, and practice of home-based food handlers in Hulu Selangor, Malaysia and to determine the correlation between food safety knowledge, and practice among home-based food handlers with their socio-demographic characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

The link for this survey, which used Google Form, was distributed among home-based food handlers via social media, such as Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The respondents who operated their business in Hulu Selangor, Malaysia were selected through a purposive sampling technique, where the researcher relies on his or her judgment when choosing members of the population to participate in the study. The study used a self-administered questionnaire that was based on and adapted from previous studies [12,13]. Only the respondents that were agreed upon to participate in this study proceeded to answer the questionnaire.
The evaluations were measured by the food handlers’ knowledge, and practice on food processing, food reheating, food storage, work area, raw and cooked food handling, and others. The self-administered questionnaire was divided into four sections: demographic profiles, knowledge of food safety, and food safety practices.
During the study, the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents were collected, such as location, gender, age, educational level, income, and work experience. The gender groups were categorized by ‘male’ and ‘female’. Age groups were categorized into 2 groups, ‘youth’ (17–35 years old) and ‘adult’ (36 and above). Education levels were divided into two groups, which were respondents having a ‘low level of education’ (received education up to secondary level) and a ‘high level of education’ (that received education after their secondary level). The categories of income were classified into five groups, ‘RM500-RM999’, ‘RM1000-RM1499’, ‘RM1500-RM1999’, ‘RM2000-RM3999’, and ‘more than RM4000’. The range for job experience was divided into ‘experienced’ (work for one year or more) and ‘inexperienced’ (work for less than one year). Other information related to having the typhoid injection and attending SLPM had two options for the answers, which were ‘yes’ and ‘no’.
Finally, the data obtained from this research were analyzed using SPSS for descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis (SPSS Inc., version 26, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristic of the respondents. The study consists of an almost equal number of female and male participants. They were mostly highly educated and received a monthly income of more than RM 1500. In addition, more than 70% of them had experience in the foodservice industry, had received the typhoid injection and had attended a food safety training program.
Furthermore, from the statistical analysis, this study found that there was an association between level of knowledge and practice among the home-based food handlers (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The same findings were discovered by Abu Bakar et al. [14] and Alqurashi et al. [15] who discovered that there was an association between the level of knowledge and practice among the food handlers. Their studies were focused on food hygiene knowledge and practice of on-campus food handlers during the COVID-19 pandemic, and evaluating food safety knowledge and practices among food service staff in Al Madinah Hospitals, Saudi Arabia, respectively. This shows that a good level of knowledge can ensure that the food handlers practice good hygiene measures.
The knowledge section consisted of 18 questions. For this section, respondents were allowed to select ‘yes’ or ‘no’ responses. For the knowledge section, the correct answers were converted to 100%. Marks below 50% was considered low knowledge, 50–74.99% was considered acceptable knowledge, and 75% and above was considered excellent knowledge. As stated in Table 3, this study showed that knowledge was significantly correlated with experience, with those who received the typhoid injection, and attendance at a food safety course (p < 0.05). A study conducted by da Vitória et al. [16] also found that the knowledge level was associated with experience. The longer the experience, the better the knowledge level. Furthermore, Has et al. [17], Woh et al. [18], and Dora-Liyana et al. [19] discovered that there was a statistically significant correlation between knowledge and practice scores of food handlers before and after attending food hygiene training. In addition, an assessment of KAP on trained food handlers is crucial to ensure the effectiveness of the food safety training in food handlers [20].
The section on practice consists of twelve questions. Respondents had to select one for an answer, either ‘never’, ‘usually’, ‘sometimes’, ‘rarely’, or ‘always’. The marks were then converted to poor practice (marks below 50%) and good practice (50% and above). Based on Table 4, this study showed that practice was significantly correlated with education level, income, and age (p < 0.05). A study done by Hossen et al. [21] found that the level of education had a significant influence on food safety knowledge and the practice of food handlers. Food handlers’ education had a significantly favorable impact on their current food hygiene awareness; thus, food handlers with a higher education status were shown to have more food safety knowledge and practice than those who were less qualified. A similar study in Kuching, Malaysia, found that education has an important influence on food safety awareness [22]. Food handlers’ awareness of food safety has been said to improve as a result of education [23]. Furthermore, this study showed that practice was significantly correlated with age. These findings were supported by previous studies [24]. This might be due to as the respondents get older, they will gain more experience related to their career, which reflects on their hygienic practices in the premise. This study also demonstrated that practice was significantly correlated with income. Another study found that as a monthly income increased, so did the level of food safety practice [25]. The reason for this might be related to the better facilities on the premises—as the income gets higher, better facilities and equipment can be provided to aid in good hygiene practice.

4. Conclusions

Results have shown that the level of home-based food handlers’ knowledge was high with a mean percentage score (SD) of 97.50% (10.02). Furthermore, the level of food handlers’ practice was also high, with a mean percentage score (SD) of 96.05% (7.92). The study found that knowledge was significantly correlated with experience, typhoid injection and attending a food safety course (p < 0.05), whereas practice was significantly correlated with education level, income, and age (p < 0.05). This study also found that there was a significant relationship between the level of knowledge and practice among the home-based food handler (p < 0.05). Due to the increased number of home-based food handlers, it is critical to ensure that foods served to customers are safe and clean. Consequently, this will lead to a reduced number of foodborne illnesses. The study, therefore, showed the level of knowledge and practice in food safety among home-based food handlers and the data can be used to decrease the incidence of foodborne illness due to mishandling at home.

Author Contributions

Data collection, analysis and original draft preparation, F.J.M.F.; review and editing, N.A.A.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge all respondents that answered the questionnaire in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tauxe, R.V.; Doyle, M.P.; Kuchenmüller, T.; Schlundt, J.; Stein, C.E. Evolving public health approaches to the global challenge of foodborne infections. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 139, S16–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dzul. Home-Based Food Businesses Are Allowed to Operate. Available online: https://themalaysianreserve.com/2020/05/04/home-based-food-businesses-allowed-to-operate-during-ramadhan (accessed on 28 August 2021).
  3. Musa, Z. Register Home-Based Food Businesses, Say Folks. Available online: https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2020/06/24/register-home-based-food-businesses-say-folks (accessed on 27 January 2021).
  4. Gruenfeldova, J.; Domijan, K.; Walsh, C. A study of food safety knowledge, practice and training among food handlers in Ireland. Food Control 2019, 105, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Food Safety and Quality. Available online: http://fsq.moh.gov.my/v6/xs/dl.php?filename=9ed1311341a5aa346286fb7fe367d4cb.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2021).
  6. Food Handlers Must Get Anti-Typhoid Injections. Available online: https://www.utusanborneo.com.my/2019/05/09/pengendali-makanan-wajib-mendapatkan-suntikan-anti-tifoid (accessed on 15 February 2021).
  7. Teffo, L.A.; Tabit, F.T. An assessment of the food safety knowledge and attitudes of food handlers in hospitals. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. McFarland, P.; Checinska Sielaff, A.; Rasco, B.; Smith, S. Efficacy of food safety training in commercial food service. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 1239–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Nik Rosmawati, N.H.; Wan Manan, W.N.; Noor Izani, N.J.; Nik Nurain, N.H. Validity and reliability of food safety knowledge and practices questionnaire among food handlers. Health Environ. J. 2015, 6, 11–30. [Google Scholar]
  10. Malangu, N. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Food Poisoning in Africa. Significance, Prevention, and Control of Food Related Diseases. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/49838 (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  11. Saipullizan, S.N.A.; Mutalib, S.A.; Sedek, R. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of food utensils hygiene amongst food handlers in Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Sains Malays. 2018, 47, 1527–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Siau, A.M.F.; Son, R.; Mohhiddin, O.; Toh, P.S.; Chai, L.C. Food court hygiene assessment and food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food handlers in Putrajaya. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 1843–1854. [Google Scholar]
  13. Abdul-Mutalib, N.A.; Abdul-Rashid, M.F.; Mustafa, S.; Amin-Nordin, S.; Hamat, R.A.; Osman, M. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding food hygiene and sanitation of food handlers in Kuala Pilah, Malaysia. Food Control 2012, 27, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abu Bakar, N.A.N.; Abdullah, N.; Yusof, N.M.Y.M.; Ishak, N. Assessing food hygiene knowledge and practice of on-campus food handler during pandemic COVID-19. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2021, 10, 1305–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alqurashi, N.A.; Priyadarshini, A.; Jaiswal, A.K. Evaluating food safety knowledge and practices among food service staff in Al Madinah Hospitals, Saudi Arabia. Safety 2019, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. da Vitória, A.G.; de Souza Couto Oliveira, J.; de Almeida Pereira, L.C.; de Faria, C.P.; de São José, J.F.B. Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of food handlers: A cross-sectional study in school kitchens in Espírito Santo, Brazil. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Has, S.M.C.; Jaafar, S.N.; Zainazor, T. An assessment on pre-and post-food hygiene training on food safety’s KAP level among food handlers in Kuala Terengganu and Kuala Nerus. Malays. Appl. Biol. 2018, 47, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  18. Woh, P.Y.; Thong, K.L.; Behnke, J.M.; Lewis, J.W.; Mohd Zain, S.N. Evaluation of basic knowledge on food safety and food handling practices amongst migrant food handlers in Peninsular Malaysia. Food Control 2016, 70, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dora-Liyana, A.L.; Mahyudin, N.A.; Ismail-Fitry, M.R.; Ahmad-Zaki, A.; Rasiyuddin, H. Food safety and hygiene knowledge, attitude and practices among food handlers at boarding schools in the Northern Region of Malaysia. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2018, 8, 238–266. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zanin, L.M.; Cunha, D.T.; Rosso, V.V.; Capriles, V.D.; Stedefeldt, E. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food handlers in food safety: An integrative review. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hossen, M.T.; Ferdaus, M.J.; Hasan, M.M.; Lina, N.N.; Das, A.K.; Barman, S.K.; Paul, D.K.; Roy, R.K. Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of street food vendors in Jashore region, Bangladesh. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rahman, M.M.; Arif, M.T.; Bakar, K.; Tambi, Z. Food safety knowledge, attitude and hygiene practices among the street food vendors in Northern Kuching City, Sarawak. Borneo Sci. 2016, 31, 95–103. [Google Scholar]
  23. World Health Organization. Archived: WHO Timeline-COVID-19. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-04-2020-who-timeline---COVID-19 (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  24. Samapundo, S.; Climat, R.; Xhaferi, R.; Devlieghere, F. Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of street food vendors and consumers in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Food Control 2015, 50, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adane, M.; Teka, B.; Gismu, Y.; Halefom, G.; Ademe, M. Food hygiene and safety measures among food handlers in street food shops and food establishments of Dessie town, Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristic of home-based food handlers (n = 100).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristic of home-based food handlers (n = 100).
CharacteristicPercentage (%)
GenderMale48
Female52
AgeYouth (17–35 years old)50
Adult (36 and above)50
Educational levelLow level of education25
High level of education75
IncomeRM 500–RM 9995
RM 1000–RM 149920
RM 1500–RM 199934
RM 2000–RM 399934
more than RM 40007
Working experienceExperience82
Less experience18
Having typhoid injectionNo27
Yes73
Attended food safety trainingNever28
Attended72
Table 2. The relationship of food handlers’ knowledge level with their practice level (n = 100).
Table 2. The relationship of food handlers’ knowledge level with their practice level (n = 100).
x 2 p
Pearson Chi-square158.1030.00 1
1 A p-value less than 0.05 is statistically significant.
Table 3. The relationship between food handlers’ knowledge level and their socio-demographic characteristics (n = 100).
Table 3. The relationship between food handlers’ knowledge level and their socio-demographic characteristics (n = 100).
Variables Knowledge Leveln (%) x 2 p
AcceptableExcellence
GenderMale048484.9160.555
Female25052
AgeAdult2485027.1890.613
Youth05050
Educational levelHigh level of education2737515.7500.897
Low level of education02525
IncomeRM 500–RM 99905524.7870.417
RM 1000–RM 149902020
RM 1500–RM 199913334
RM 2000–RM 399913334
more than RM 4000077
Work experienceExperience2808214.4940.025 *
Less experience01818
Having typhoid injectionNo2252731.1360.000 *
Yes07373
Attended food safety trainingNever2262832.6730.000 *
Attended07272
* A p-value less than 0.05 is statistically significant.
Table 4. The relationship between food handlers’ practice level and their socio-demographic characteristics (n = 100).
Table 4. The relationship between food handlers’ practice level and their socio-demographic characteristics (n = 100).
Variables Practice Leveln (%) x 2 p
PoorGood
GenderMale246486.7230.347
Female05252
AgeAdult14950118.6960.000 *
Youth14950
Educational levelHigh level of education27375110.2010.000 *
Low level of education02525
IncomeRM 500–RM 99905539.7170.023 *
RM 1000–RM 149911920
RM 1500–RM 199903434
RM 2000–RM 399903434
more than RM 4000167
Work experienceExperience280822.1710.903
Less experience01818
Having typhoid injectionNo126275.4700.485
Yes17273
Attended food safety trainingNever127287.5800.271
Attended17172
* A p-value less than 0.05 is statistically significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohamad Fauzi, F.J.; Abdul-Mutalib, N.A. Knowledge, and Practice of Home-Based Food Handlers in Hulu Selangor, Malaysia Regarding Food Safety. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 6, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10930

AMA Style

Mohamad Fauzi FJ, Abdul-Mutalib NA. Knowledge, and Practice of Home-Based Food Handlers in Hulu Selangor, Malaysia Regarding Food Safety. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 6(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10930

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohamad Fauzi, Farah Jasmina, and Noor Azira Abdul-Mutalib. 2021. "Knowledge, and Practice of Home-Based Food Handlers in Hulu Selangor, Malaysia Regarding Food Safety" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 6, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10930

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop