Next Article in Journal
Enhancing the Safety and Quality of Coconut Residue from Virgin Coconut Oil Wet Processing Through Thermal Pretreatment: A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Abstracts of the 3rd International Online Conference on Agriculture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Bigger Edible Pods, Smaller Gene Pools? Exploring Trade-Offs Across Inga edulis Mart. Cultivation Systems †

1
MUHNAC—Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Universidade de Lisboa, CE3C—Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Natural History & Systematics (NHS), CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, 1250-102 Lisbon, Portugal
2
Biodiversidad de Ecosistemas Tropicales-BIETROP, Herbario HUTPL, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja 1101608, Ecuador
3
Forest Research Centre (CEF), Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Online Conference on Agriculture (IOCAG 2025), 22–24 October 2025; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IOCAG2025.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2025, 54(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2025054015
Published: 4 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Online Conference on Agriculture)

Abstract

Inga edulis Mart. (Fabaceae) is a multipurpose fruit tree widely cultivated in Ecuador. We explored how contrasting cultivation systems are associated with variation in fruit traits and genetic diversity by comparing agroforestry plantations and traditional home gardens. Trees in agroforestry systems exhibited significantly larger pods whereas home-garden populations showed higher levels of genetic diversity. These patterns suggest a potential trade-off between productivity-oriented management and the maintenance of genetic variation, possibly reflecting differences in management practices and seed sourcing. These results highlight the complementary roles of agroforestry and home gardens in the sustainable use and in situ conservation of I. edulis within traditional landscapes.

1. Introduction

Tropical trees that combine cultural value, ecological services, and economic potential play an increasingly important role in the sustainability of rural landscapes. Among these, Inga edulis Mart. (Fabaceae) is one of the most emblematic species of the Amazon Basin [1]. Commonly known as “guaba” or “ice-cream bean,” it is valued for its edible pods, which contain a sweet, cotton-textured pulp. It is also valued for its fast growth and nitrogen-fixing ability that enhance soil fertility, and for providing shade for crops such as coffee and cacao [2]. Because of its versatility and resilience, I. edulis has become a keystone component of agroforestry systems across tropical America, where it supports both livelihoods and ecosystem functioning [3].
In recent years, the species has gained attention as a model for understanding incipient domestication processes in tropical trees, where human selection for desirable traits such as pod size or fruit sweetness can rapidly shape population structure [4]. For example, a study on I. edulis from the Peruvian Amazon [5] demonstrated that cultivated populations display significantly longer pods but reduced allelic richness compared to their wild counterparts, indicating an early stage of domestication and a potential loss of genetic diversity. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating how different cultivation practices influence both productivity and genetic resources across the species’ range, although studies from other regions are basically absent. In southern Ecuador, two main cultivation contexts predominate: agroforestry systems, in which I. edulis is deliberately planted to provide shade in coffee and cacao plantations, and home gardens, which are frequently composed of pre-existing trees retained during land clearing or occasionally supplemented by planting. In home gardens, these trees are typically managed for household use, with fruit production serving mainly subsistence purposes.
Understanding how cultivation contexts influence I. edulis diversity is crucial for integrating productivity, cultural practices, and in situ conservation. Assessing variation in fruit traits and genetic diversity across management systems can help identify trade-offs between yield and genetic heterogeneity, providing insights for the sustainable use of this Amazonian fruit tree. Accordingly, this study aimed to (1) quantify differences in pod size between I. edulis trees grown in agroforestry and home-garden systems in southern Ecuador, (2) assess genetic diversity patterns using microsatellite markers, and (3) discuss the implications of these patterns for conservation and sustainable management of I. edulis in traditional landscapes.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Morphological Measurements

Fieldwork was conducted in southern Ecuador, sampling adult I. edulis individuals across two contrasting cultivation contexts: agroforestry plantations and traditional home gardens. A total of 62 trees were sampled, comprising 32 individuals from agroforestry systems and 30 individuals from home gardens.
In home gardens, I. edulis typically occurs as one or two trees per garden, which limits within-site replication. Therefore, our sampling in this context prioritized the number of independent home gardens rather than the number of trees per site. In contrast, agroforestry plantations commonly contain multiple I. edulis individuals, allowing a greater number of trees to be sampled per plantation while maintaining spatial independence across farms. This sampling strategy was designed to maximize biological replication at the level of individual trees while accurately reflecting the socio-ecological structure of each management system. However, this structure may result in differences in relatedness or seed provenance among sampled individuals, particularly in agroforestry plantations.
For each tree, ten mature pods were collected and measured for pod length (cm) using a digital caliper, resulting in a total of 620 fruits. Pod length was measured along the longitudinal axis from the point of peduncle attachment (pod base) to the distal apex. To avoid pseudoreplication, pod measurements were averaged per individual tree, and individual trees were used as the unit of replication in subsequent analyses. Differences in mean pod length between cultivation systems were tested using a two-sample t-test, with cultivation system as the grouping factor. Given the exploratory nature of the study, analyses were conducted at the tree level to provide a first-order comparison between management systems rather than to partition variance across hierarchical levels.

2.2. DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Leaf samples from the above adult trees were collected in each population, brought to the laboratory, and stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −80 °C. To genotype all samples, we used four microsatellite (SSR) loci previously developed for Inga edulis species [4] plus one locus (Pel5) that was previously developed for Pithecellobium elegans by [6] and was successfully transferred to I. edulis (Table 1). Thus, these primers were selected because they have been previously validated in Inga species and because of their high polymorphism. This allows direct comparison with previous studies. SSR amplifications were performed in 15 μL reactions containing 1.25 U MyTaq DNA polymerase and 1× MyTaq Reaction Buffer (Meridian Bioscience, London, UK), 0.4 μM Primer F-FAM and R, and 100 ng of genomic DNA carried and amplified as described in [4]. PCR products were genotyped on an Applied Biosystems 3130XL Genetic Analyzer using 2 μL of amplified DNA, 12 μL of Hi-Di formamide, and 0.4 μL of GeneScan-600 (LIZ) size standard (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Genotyping of microsatellite fragments was conducted on an AB 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies Inc., New York, NY, USA). Allele sizes were determined using GeneMarker 3.1. (Softgenetics, State College, PA, USA).

2.3. Genetic Diversity Analysis

For each population, the mean number of alleles per locus (A), effective number of alleles (Ne), observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He), and fixation index (FIS) were calculated using GenAlEx v6.51 [7]. Differences in diversity indices between cultivation systems were tested using permutation procedures (10,000 iterations).

3. Results

3.1. Pod Traits

Pod dimensions varied significantly between cultivation systems. Trees growing in agroforestry plantations had, on average, longer pods (mean ± SE = 60.5 ± 2.1 cm) than trees in home gardens (39.2 ± 1.8 cm; t = 2.228, d.f. = 30, p < 0.05; Figure 1).

3.2. Genetic Diversity

Genetic diversity indices differed significantly between cultivation systems (Table 2). Home garden populations showed higher mean numbers of alleles per locus and higher expected heterozygosity than agroforestry populations (Table 2). Observed heterozygosity was also significantly higher in home gardens than in agroforestry systems (Table 2). Both systems exhibited positive fixation indices, although there were lower FIS values in home gardens compared with agroforestry populations (Table 2).

4. Discussion

This exploratory study identified patterns consistent with a potential trade-off between productivity-oriented management and levels of genetic diversity in Inga edulis. Trees in agroforestry systems were associated with larger pods on average, while exhibiting lower overall genetic variability compared with home gardens. Similar associations have been reported for tropical perennial species under early stages of domestication, where recurrent selection for desirable phenotypes may contribute to increased genetic homogeneity within managed populations [4,5,8]. In such contexts, selective propagation of a limited number of preferred individuals, together with seed exchange occurring within relatively restricted farmer networks, likely constrains the influx of new alleles [9].
Rather than comparing wild and cultivated populations, this study focused on differences within human-managed landscapes, where management intensity varies but gene flow remains active. This approach allowed us to explore how cultivation context may be associated with phenotypic and genetic patterns during early stages of domestication. In this light, our findings complement and extend those reported by [5], who documented reduced allelic richness in cultivated I. edulis trees relative to wild populations, alongside selection for longer pods in the Peruvian Amazon. Importantly, our results show that genetic differentiation can also emerge within cultivated systems themselves. Agroforestry plantations in southern Ecuador showed patterns of phenotypic enlargement and reduced genetic diversity similar to those reported for cultivated stands in Peru [5], despite the absence of direct wild references in our dataset. Such comparisons should be interpreted cautiously, as differences in the regional context or the sampling design preclude direct equivalence. Although our markers are highly polymorphic and have been previously validated for I. edulis and related taxa [4,5], their reduced coverage limits the robustness of estimates of genetic diversity and fixation indices and increases sensitivity to locus-specific effects. As such, the patterns reported here should be interpreted as indicative first-order contrasts between management systems rather than definitive evidence of genetic erosion or domestication trajectories.
Nevertheless, our data suggests that home gardens may function as microcosms of diversity that help mitigate genetic erosion in I. edulis. In southern Ecuador, farmers frequently plant seeds obtained from neighboring communities, local markets, or nearby semi-wild trees, promoting ongoing gene flow across the landscape. Although both cultivation systems exhibited positive fixation indices, the lower FIS values observed in home gardens suggest weaker heterozygote deficits, likely reflecting higher connectivity and less structured seed sourcing rather than strong inbreeding. The positive FIS values in both systems may also partly reflect Wahlund effects arising from the pooling of individuals originating from multiple seed sources or subpopulations, while the contribution of null alleles cannot be entirely ruled out given the limited number of loci used. However, in agroforestry plantations, where multiple trees were sampled within farms, shared seed sources or localized planting practices may increase relatedness among individuals, potentially contributing to the observed patterns of genetic diversity and fixation indices.
Beyond genetic patterns, the phenotypic differences observed among I. edulis populations also point to substantial plasticity. Larger pods in agroforestry systems likely result from a combination of potential genetic selection and favorable growing conditions, such as enhanced soil fertility, greater light availability, and targeted pruning that channels resources towards reproductive structures. Because this study is based on observational field data, these effects cannot be fully disentangled in the absence of common-garden experiments or other forms of experimental control. Moreover, pod size alone represents an incomplete proxy for fitness. While larger fruits may increase market value and enhance seed dispersal, they can also entail higher energetic costs or trade-offs with other traits, including seed viability or germination performance.
In sum, this study highlights the potential value of viewing agroforestry systems and home gardens as complementary rather than competing components of tropical agricultural landscapes. Although based on a regional and exploratory dataset, the patterns observed may be informative for other tropical tree species, where productivity-oriented management coexists with ongoing gene flow and informal seed exchange [9,10]. Participatory initiatives such as community seed banks, farmer-led selection programs, and nurseries incorporating diverse local genotypes could further strengthen this role. Future research should also expand sampling to wild and semi-wild populations, incorporate higher-resolution genomic tools to detect selection signatures, and assess how landscape connectivity and cultural practices jointly shape the genetic structure of I. edulis across the Andes–Amazon gradient.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M.; methodology, D.D.; formal analysis, F.T. and Á.B.; investigation, F.T. and Á.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.D.; writing—review and editing, D.D. and I.M.; visualization, D.D. and I.M.; supervision, D.D. and I.M.; project administration, I.M.; funding acquisition, I.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Funds through Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through project reference UID/00239/2025 (CEF), LA/P/0092/2020 (Associate Laboratory TERRA), UID/00329/2025 (Ce3C) and IM by the Scientific Employment Stimulus—Individual Call (CEEC Individual)—2021.01107.CEECIND/CP1689/CT0001, and through the Ecuadorian project CC45-2018.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. de Oliveira, A.V.; Kersting, M.; da Costa, A.B.; de Souza Schneider, R.d.C. Biotechnological and environmental education potential of Inga edulis Martius: Seeds collected in the amazon, brazil. Biotropia 2024, 31, 316–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alegre, J.C.; Weber, J.C.; Bandy, D.E. The potential of Inga species for improved woody fallows and multistrata agroforests in Peruvian Amazon basin. In The Genus Inga-Utilization; The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  3. Council, N.R. Lost Crops of the Incas: Little-Known Plants of the Andes with Promise for Worldwide Cultivation; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hollingsworth, P.M.; Dawson, I.K.; Goodall-Copestake, W.P.; Richardson, J.E.; Weber, J.C.; Montes, C.S.; Pennington, R.T. Do farmers reduce genetic diversity when they domesticate tropical trees? A case study from Amazonia. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rollo, A.; Ribeiro, M.M.; Costa, R.L.; Santos, C.; Clavo, Z.M.P.; Mandák, B.; Kalousová, M.; Vebrová, H.; Chuqulin, E.; Torres, S.G.; et al. Genetic Structure and Pod Morphology of Inga edulis Cultivated vs. Wild Populations from the Peruvian Amazon. Forests 2020, 11, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dayanandan, S.; Bawa, K.S.; Kesseli, R. Conservation of microsatellites among tropical trees (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 1997, 84, 1658–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinforma. Appl. 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Qi, D. Plant biodiversity assessment of the ancient tea garden ecosystem in Jingmai of Lancang, Yunnan. Biodivers. Sci. 2005, 13, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Coomes, O.T.; McGuire, S.J.; Garine, E.; Caillon, S.; McKey, D.; Demeulenaere, E.; Jarvis, D.; Aistara, G.; Barnaud, A.; Clouvel, P.; et al. Farmer seed networks make a limited contribution to agriculture? Four common misconceptions. Food Policy 2015, 56, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Princely Awazi, N.; Fondo Ambebe, T.; Njamnjubo, N.A.; Guy, T.; Zanguim, H. Promoting Agroforestry Systems for Livelihoods and Ecosystem Management: The Role of Global, National and Sectorial Initiatives. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 2024, 34, 556379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Differences in the pod length (cm) of Inga edulis in agroforestry systems (n = 32 trees) and home gardens (n = 30 trees). Values represent means ± SE calculated at the tree level.
Figure 1. Differences in the pod length (cm) of Inga edulis in agroforestry systems (n = 32 trees) and home gardens (n = 30 trees). Values represent means ± SE calculated at the tree level.
Blsf 54 00015 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of SSR markers amplified in Inga edulis, including primer sequences (forward and reverse), repeat motifs, annealing temperatures (Ta), and expected product size ranges.
Table 1. Characteristics of SSR markers amplified in Inga edulis, including primer sequences (forward and reverse), repeat motifs, annealing temperatures (Ta), and expected product size ranges.
LocusPrimer Sequence: 5′ to 3′Repeat SequenceTa (°C)Range (bp)
Pel5F: TCTCTGCACACAGGAACCCTTTTGC(AAAG)655178–218
R: CCCAGAAATAAGGCTCTTTTGCACA
Inga03F: TTCCAAGCTTATACAAACCTCC(CA)105961–93
R: AGATCCGTACGTGTGATGGT
Inga05F: GACTACAGTTCGAGCAAAACAAAG(TG)5CA(TG)659123–164
R: TATTCATCTCTAACACGGTCGG
Inga08F: TTTGAGATGAATAGAGAAAGCC(CT)4GT(CT)355136–168
R: GATTTAGCTTGTTGGTGTTTG
Inga33F: TATAACCGATTCACCCCTTGATG(CT)8(CA)855214–240
R: AAAGCACTATAAGATATGTGTGTC
Table 2. Summary of genetic diversity in Inga edulis populations collected in agroforestry and home gardens, including the mean number of alleles (A), effective number of alleles (Ne), observed (HO) and expected heterozygosity (He), and fixation index (FIS), averaged across loci. The significance of heterozygote deficiency tests is indicated (**, p < 0.01).
Table 2. Summary of genetic diversity in Inga edulis populations collected in agroforestry and home gardens, including the mean number of alleles (A), effective number of alleles (Ne), observed (HO) and expected heterozygosity (He), and fixation index (FIS), averaged across loci. The significance of heterozygote deficiency tests is indicated (**, p < 0.01).
Type of PopulationANeHoHeFIS
Agroforestry5.92.50.630.710.15 **
Home gardens9.16.20.700.850.08 **
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Draper, D.; Tinitana, F.; Benítez, Á.; Marques, I. Bigger Edible Pods, Smaller Gene Pools? Exploring Trade-Offs Across Inga edulis Mart. Cultivation Systems. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2025, 54, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2025054015

AMA Style

Draper D, Tinitana F, Benítez Á, Marques I. Bigger Edible Pods, Smaller Gene Pools? Exploring Trade-Offs Across Inga edulis Mart. Cultivation Systems. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2025; 54(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2025054015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Draper, David, Fani Tinitana, Ángel Benítez, and Isabel Marques. 2025. "Bigger Edible Pods, Smaller Gene Pools? Exploring Trade-Offs Across Inga edulis Mart. Cultivation Systems" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 54, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2025054015

APA Style

Draper, D., Tinitana, F., Benítez, Á., & Marques, I. (2025). Bigger Edible Pods, Smaller Gene Pools? Exploring Trade-Offs Across Inga edulis Mart. Cultivation Systems. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 54(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2025054015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop