Next Article in Journal
Comparative Evaluation of Hypoglycemic Activity of Cucumis sativus and Cucurbita pepo Whole Plant Extracts in Normal and Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactive Influence of Cell-Free Supernatant from Lactoplantibacillus plantarum Strains on Probiotic Bifidobacteria: Preliminary Study on Growth and Survival Kinetic Parameters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Evaluation of the Use of Propolis and Sodium Hypochlorite as Methods to Control the Contamination of Free-Range Eggs †

by
Giovana Scuissiatto de Souza
1,2,
Julia Unicki Philipp
2,
Elisana Julek
1,2,
Gabriela Campi Voltolin
2,
Guilherme Souza Cavalcanti de Albuquerque
3 and
Julia Arantes Galvão
1,2,*
1
Post-Graduation Program in Veterinary Sciences, Veterinary Department, Campus Cabral, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba 80035-050, PR, Brazil
2
Quality Control and Food Safety Laboratory, Veterinary Department, Campus Cabral, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba 80035-050, PR, Brazil
3
Independent Researcher, Piraquara 83307-300, PR, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Electronic Conference on Foods, Food Microbiology, 28–30 October 2024.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 40(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040049
Published: 11 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Foods)

Abstract

:
There is a high demand for free-range eggs, although these systems may offer a greater microbiological challenge. Therefore, the aim with this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 30% propolis extract and 1% sodium hypochlorite in reducing the microbiological contamination of free-range eggs. Eighteen eggs were divided into three groups—treated with propolis, hypochlorite and a control—and tested for mesophilic bacterial count. For the eggshells treated by propolis, the average count was 0.6 log CFU·mL−1, for hypochlorite it was 1.3 log CFU·mL−1 and for the control it was 3.26 log CFU·mL−1. It can be concluded that both methods were effective, with propolis being more efficient.

1. Introduction

In recent years, free-range egg production has increased due to growing consumer interest in animal welfare [1]. However, this production method introduces new health challenges due to free-range housing, which can increase microbiological risk [2]. Eggshell contamination occurs both in the hen’s reproductive organs and after laying. In the reproductive organs, microorganisms such as Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli and mycoplasmas can infect the ovary [3,4]. In this context, factors such as rearing conditions, the length of time the eggs are stored and the age of the hen have a significant influence on the microbiological quality of the eggs [3].
Farms that do not adopt adequate hygiene measures contribute to the rapid contamination of eggs by various microorganisms. The incomplete formation of the cuticle layer can leave open pores in the shell, allowing microorganisms to penetrate into the egg [3]. Therefore, it is essential to implement appropriate egg sanitization practices to avoid contamination by harmful microorganisms [5,6]. In this sense, propolis extract is a natural beekeeping bioproduct that has aroused the interest of researchers due to its antimicrobial, antifungal and antioxidant properties [3,7,8], and it can be used in the food industry for various purposes, such as controlling pathogenic microorganisms and extending the shelf life of products [3,8]. On the other hand, sodium hypochlorite also has antimicrobial properties [9] and is a more traditional option for controlling contamination in food production systems.
The traditional method (the utilization of chlorine) presents numerous drawbacks, including the generation of carcinogenic substances and a decrease in efficacy due to the presence of organic matter [10]. Consequently, there has been a significant emphasis on identifying natural antimicrobial agents for food product disinfection. Various natural antimicrobials, such as probiotics, prebiotics and essential oils, have been investigated for their potential to reduce microbial contamination on eggshells [11].
Aligned with that, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 30% propolis extract and 1% sodium hypochlorite as methods for controlling egg contamination on a free-range farm located in southern Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

The eggs were collected from a cage-free farm in southern Brazil and analyzed at the Quality Control and Food Safety Laboratory (LACQSA) of the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR). The farm has 120 laying hens of the NOVOgen Brown and NOVOgen Tinted breeds, which, due to the avian flu health emergency in Brazil, are kept in confinement, without access to free grazing. Even so, each confined bird has 1 m2 of space (Figure 1).
The eggs produced on the farm are deposited in nests with slanted mesh, allowing them to be collected in an area outside the barn. After collection, the eggs undergo an ovoscopy procedure for quality control and are washed with treated water supplied by the public water supply system, in accordance with the rules of the Brazilian regulatory body.
For the study, 18 eggs were randomly collected after candling and washing. These samples were divided into three groups: six eggs were sprayed with 30% propolis extract (Figure 2); six were sprayed with 1% sodium hypochlorite; and six eggs were used as controls, without spraying. The microbiological analysis was carried out on the eggshells. To assess the microbial load on the shell, six eggs from each group were rinsed with a 0.1% buffered peptone water solution (Kasvi, Pinhais, Brazil). Mesophilic aerobes were counted using the standard plate count agar method (Kasvi, Pinhais, Brazil) and colonies were counted after 48 h of incubation (36 °C) [6].

3. Results

The appearance of the eggs was brilliant after spraying propolis, but remained the same after spraying sodium hypochlorite.
After spraying the eggs, they were stored in a domestic refrigerator for 24 h and analyzed for microbial load.
In the eggshell, the results obtained for the count of mesophilic aerobic microorganisms were: propolis group 0.6 log CFU·mL−1, sodium hypochlorite group 1.3 log CFU·mL−1 and control group 3.26 log CFU·mL−1 (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

In this study, the 30% propolis extract proved to be more effective than 1% sodium hypochlorite at reducing the microorganisms present in the eggshells. The propolis extract resulted in an 81.60% decrease in the total mesophile count, reducing the concentration from 3.26 log CFU·mL−1 to 0.6 log CFU·mL−1. In comparison, 1% sodium hypochlorite led to a reduction of 60.12%, reducing the concentration from 3.26 log CFU·mL−1 to 1.3 log CFU·mL−1.
The antimicrobial potential of propolis extract is mainly attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds and flavonoids, which have the ability to damage the cell structure of these microorganisms, preventing them from multiplying or even leading to their elimination [3]. In addition, propolis extract can extend the storage life of eggs [3,12]. A study conducted by Alkan et al. [3] showed that treating eggshells with 30% propolis extract was effective in preserving the internal quality of eggs for up to 21 days at 25 °C, with a lower level of microbiological contamination compared to eggs that had not been washed or sanitized with chlorine or peracetic acid. This effect is due to the waxy and resinous composition of propolis, which forms a protective barrier around the egg, reducing gas exchange and moisture loss through the pores of the shell [3,4,12].
Similar results were found in the study by Gomes et al. [12] who used green propolis in their experiment. The study showed that eggs stored at room temperature, when treated with a green propolis coating, had better qualities, including lower weight loss, a higher yolk index and better physicochemical characteristics. The author concluded that refrigerated storage is the most suitable way to preserve egg quality. However, at room temperature, coating eggs with green propolis contributes significantly to maintaining egg quality for up to 28 days.
Another relevant factor to mention in relation to propolis is its concentration. In this study, a concentration of 30% proved to be effective at reducing the microorganisms present on eggshells, outperforming sodium hypochlorite. On the other hand, in a study carried out by Alves et al. [4], which used propolis spray at a concentration of 15%, it was observed that although propolis reduced the initial microbial growth on the shell, this effect was not sustained until the end of the storage period. Thus, the 15% concentration proved to be less effective in preserving the microbiological quality of the shell over 28 days of storage.
In addition, the formation of a physical barrier by propolis extract can be beneficial for embryonated eggs by helping to protect against microbiological contamination and maintaining suitable conditions for embryo development. A study conducted by Genc et al. [13] on Japanese quail eggs showed that treatment with propolis extract significantly reduced the microbial load on the shell, with no negative effects on hatchability, maintaining safety and quality during storage. Compared to formalin and distilled water, propolis showed better control of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, making it an effective, non-toxic and sustainable alternative for disinfection in hatcheries. Another experiment evaluated the spraying of fertile eggs with propolis, analyzing hatching characteristics and bacterial counts on the shell. The results showed the potential of propolis extract, especially at a concentration of 14%, as an efficient disinfectant for hatching eggs, promoting chick quality and reducing losses during incubation [7].
In this sense, propolis extract can be an interesting alternative to chemical sanitizers, mainly because it is effective in reducing microbiological contamination of eggshells. As well as making food safer, propolis extract attracts attention because it is a natural product [8], a characteristic that is increasingly valued by consumers, adding value to the product on the market. However, the higher cost of propolis can limit its use, especially among small farmers. On the other hand, sodium hypochlorite, although less efficient, has shown satisfactory results in microbiological reduction and is more affordable, making it a viable alternative for these producers [9].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S.d.S., J.A.G., E.J. and G.S.C.d.A.; methodology, G.S.d.S., J.A.G., J.U.P., E.J., G.S.C.d.A. and G.C.V.; formal analysis and research, G.S.d.S., J.A.G., J.U.P., E.J., G.S.C.d.A. and G.C.V.; data curation, E.J.; writing—preparation of original draft, writing—revision and editing and visualization, G.S.d.S. and J.A.G.; project supervision and administration, J.A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for their support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. McWhorter, A.R.; Chousalkar, K.K. From hatch to egg grading: Monitoring of Salmonella shedding in free-range egg production systems. Vet. Res. 2019, 50, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Galvão, J.A.; Ribeiro, S.C.A.; Amaral, L.A.; Schmidt, V.; Souza, R.A.L.; Paulillo, A.C.; Rossi, D.A. Microbiological Vulnerability of Eggs and Environmental Conditions in Conventional and Free-Range Housing Systems. Semin. Ciênc. Agrár. 2018, 39, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alkan, S.; Ertürk, Ö.; Türker, İ. Determination of Microbial Activity and Quality Traits of Eggs Coated with Propolis. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 8, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alves, G.P.; Eyng, C.; Garcia, R.G.; Orrico Junior, M.A.P.; Silva, T.S. Qualidade Microbiológica da Casca de Ovos de Poedeiras Comerciais Revestidos com Própolis e Armazenados por Diferentes Períodos. Agroecol 2016. Available online: https://www.cpao.embrapa.br/cds/agroecol2016/PDF's/Trabalhos/Qualidade%20microbiol%C3%B3gica%20da%20casca%20de%20ovos%20de%20poedeiras%20comerciais%20revestidos%20com%20pr%C3%B3polis%20e%20armazenados.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2024).
  5. Soares, A.C.B.; Brito, D.A.P.; Soares, S.C.P.; Gomes, K.S.; Saldanha, M.S.; Soares, V.S. Maintenance of Quality of Eggs Submitted to Treatment with Propolis Extract and Sanitizers. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 2022, 44, e53584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Downes, F.P.; Ito, K. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, 4th ed.; American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA, 2001; p. 676. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shahein, E.H.; Sedeek, E. Role of Spraying Hatching Eggs with Natural Disinfectants on Hatching Characteristics. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J. 2014, 34, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al-Sakhawy, M.; Salama, A.; Mohamed, S.A.A. Propolis Applications in Food Industries and Packaging. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2024, 14, 13731–13746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chan, H.Y.; Meor Hussin, A.S.; Ahmad, N.H.; Rukayadi, Y.; Farouk, A.E. Effectiveness of Quaternary Ammonium in Reducing Microbial Load on Eggs. Molecules 2021, 26, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Davies, R.H.; Breslin, M. Investigations into possible alter-native decontamination methods for Salmonella Enteritidis on the surface of table eggs. J. Vet. Med. 2003, B50, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lin, C.M.; Herianto, S.; Syu, S.M.; Song, C.H.; Chen, H.L.; Hou, C.Y. Applying a large-scale device using non-thermal plasma for microbial decontamination on shell eggs and its effects on the sensory characteristics. LWT 2021, 142, 11106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gomes, J.L.F.; Santos, T.F.F.; de Macedo, B.F.; Machado, D.C.; Oliveira, M.C. Tratamentos na Casca de Ovos de Codornas e Qualidade Interna do Ovo Durante Armazenamento. Anais do CICURV 2023, 17. Available online: http://revistas.unirv.edu.br/index.php/cicurv/article/view/252 (accessed on 11 December 2024).
  13. Genc, M.; Ozenturk, U.; Atasever, M. Can Propolis, the Natural Disinfectant of Bees, Be Used as an Effective and Healthy Disinfectant for Hatching Eggs? Indian J. Anim. Res. 2020, 54, 775–780. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Cage-free flock of the NOVOgen Brown and NOVOgen Tinted in southern Brazil, where the eggs were collected for the analysis.
Figure 1. Cage-free flock of the NOVOgen Brown and NOVOgen Tinted in southern Brazil, where the eggs were collected for the analysis.
Blsf 40 00049 g001
Figure 2. (A) Propolis sprayed on the eggs; (B) time allowed for the eggs to dry; (C) the appearance of the eggs after spaying propolis.
Figure 2. (A) Propolis sprayed on the eggs; (B) time allowed for the eggs to dry; (C) the appearance of the eggs after spaying propolis.
Blsf 40 00049 g002
Figure 3. Plate count agar showing the dilution of the samples for counting. Each white point is considered a bacterial colony after 48 h of incubation at 36 °C.
Figure 3. Plate count agar showing the dilution of the samples for counting. Each white point is considered a bacterial colony after 48 h of incubation at 36 °C.
Blsf 40 00049 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Souza, G.S.; Philipp, J.U.; Julek, E.; Voltolin, G.C.; de Albuquerque, G.S.C.; Galvão, J.A. Evaluation of the Use of Propolis and Sodium Hypochlorite as Methods to Control the Contamination of Free-Range Eggs. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 40, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040049

AMA Style

de Souza GS, Philipp JU, Julek E, Voltolin GC, de Albuquerque GSC, Galvão JA. Evaluation of the Use of Propolis and Sodium Hypochlorite as Methods to Control the Contamination of Free-Range Eggs. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2024; 40(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040049

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Souza, Giovana Scuissiatto, Julia Unicki Philipp, Elisana Julek, Gabriela Campi Voltolin, Guilherme Souza Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, and Julia Arantes Galvão. 2024. "Evaluation of the Use of Propolis and Sodium Hypochlorite as Methods to Control the Contamination of Free-Range Eggs" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 40, no. 1: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040049

APA Style

de Souza, G. S., Philipp, J. U., Julek, E., Voltolin, G. C., de Albuquerque, G. S. C., & Galvão, J. A. (2024). Evaluation of the Use of Propolis and Sodium Hypochlorite as Methods to Control the Contamination of Free-Range Eggs. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 40(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop