Next Article in Journal
Predicting Maturity of Coconut Fruit from Acoustic Signal with Applications of Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Preface: The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Nutrients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Evaluating the Synergistic Effects of Foliar Boron and Magnesium Application for Mitigating Drought in Wheat †

by
Abdallah Aldahadha
* and
Yahya Bani Khalaf
Department of Field Crops, National Agricultural Research Centre (NARC), Baqa’a 19381, Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Online Conference on Agriculture, 1–15 November 2023; Available online: https://iocag2023.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 30(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-15964
Published: 10 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Online Conference on Agriculture)

Abstract

:
The grain yield of wheat is primarily limited by drought. To increase the level of productivity under these conditions, a pot experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of foliar fertilizer with boron and magnesium under drought at either tillering or anthesis stages on some physiological parameters and yield components of two varieties of durum wheat. Foliar application with combined boron and magnesium significantly improved the transpiration rate, relative water content, and total chlorophyll content. Foliar application with combined boron and magnesium significantly increased the grain weight of wheat varieties at tillering and anthesis drought by 25% and 36%, respectively. Our findings showed the significance of foliar application at anthesis drought rather than at tillering for improvement of grain yield.

1. Introduction

Wheat (Triticum durum) is among the most crucial field crops grown under rainfed conditions in Jordan and considered essential for food security at the national and global level [1]. Drought is a major abiotic stress and the most unpredictable constraint, with adverse effects on crop production. Drought has a negative impact on plants by disturbing many plant activities, including the carbon assimilation rate, decreased turgor, and changes in leaf gas exchange, thus causing a reduction in yield [2]. Reduced chlorophyll due to water stress causes chlorosis, which leads to a reduction in photosynthesis [3]. In addition, drought also reduces leaf relative water content (RWC) and stomatal conductance, which ultimately leads to reduced growth and biomass production [4]. Drought stress most commonly occurs after anthesis in wheat [5].
The foliar application of different nutrients to different crops at different growth stages can increase the tolerance mechanism in crops and therefore enhance crop yield [6]. Boron (B) is required by plants in microquantities and has stimulated responses of resistance against drought stress [7]. The nutritional supply of B resulted in improved stomatal conductance and carbon assimilation [8]. Boron application improves the growth, grain production, and water-use efficiency of wheat [9]. In addition, magnesium (Mg) is a macronutrient required for chlorophyll synthesis and thus essential for the photosynthesis process in plants. Also, Mg enhanced drought tolerance and played a vital role in all the biochemical and physiological processes of plants through different pathways [10].
Several studies have shown that foliar applications of boron and magnesium can increase crop yields. However, limited or no information is available regarding the effect of the combined foliar application of boron and magnesium on the growth and yield of durum wheat under water stress. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the effect of B and Mg application alone and in combination on improving some of the physiological traits and yield components of two varieties of durum wheat grown under tillering or drought stress during the anthesis stage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Two durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) varieties (Hourani and Maru 1) were used in this experiment. Maru1 is an improved variety released and registered in 2019–2020, while Hourani is an old variety (released in 1976) and known as a drought-tolerant variety.

2.2. Soil Preparation and Seed Sowing

A pot experiment was conducted in a glasshouse at the Maru Agricultural Research Station (MARS), Jordan. Seventy-two pots (27 cm diameter × 27 cm height) were used for this experiment, and each pot was filled with 4 kg of clay soil mixed with peat (1:1) (v/v). Plants were thinned to two seedlings per pot at the two-leaf stage one week after emergence.

2.3. Growth Conditions and Treatments

The temperature in the greenhouse was controlled at 25/15 °C (day/night). Pots were supplied with NPK fertilizer on a weekly basis from the beginning of tillering. Foliar spraying was applied twice during the experiment: once during the tillering drought and another during the anthesis drought, and compared with those sprayed in well-watered conditions. Fertilizer treatments (boron, magnesium, and boron + magnesium) were sprayed one day before the beginning of the drought either at the tillering or anthesis growth stages, while the controls were sprayed with distilled water. Boron was sprayed in the form of boric acid (H3BO3) at a concentration of 0.3 g/L (% B in boric acid = 17.48%), whereas magnesium was sprayed in the form of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4·7H2O) at a concentration of 5 g/L (% Mg in magnesium sulfate = 9.86%). Drought was imposed by withholding watering for 7 days at tillering (GS 22; D1) or anthesis (GS 65; D2) according to the Zadoks scale [11] on separate sets of plants and compared with well-watered (WW) plants, which were regularly watered to field capacity.

2.4. Physiological Measurements and RWC

The transpiration rate (µg cm2 s1) was measured with a portable steady state porometer (LICOR model LI-1600), while the total chlorophyll content (TCC) was determined non-destructively using a portable chlorophyll meter, the SPAD 502 Chlorophyll Meter (Spectrum Technologies Inc., Plainfield, IL, USA), on the same leaf as RWC prior to excision at the beginning and one week after plant stresses at either tillering or anthesis stages. The relative water content (RWC) was determined according to the methodology outlined by the authors of [12].

2.5. Growth and Yield Components

At the full maturity stage, the number of tillers and heads was counted. The above-ground plant parts were harvested and separated into vegetative and head parts. The grains were separated from the heads by threshing, and grain weight was determined for each pot. The total dry weight of the shoots was determined after drying in an oven at 80 °C for two days. The one thousand-grain weight was determined from the weight of 200 seeds per sample. The harvest index (HI) was calculated by dividing grain weight by total (grain plus shoot) weight.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

This experiment was performed in a factorial, completely randomized design. There were three replicates for each treatment. The data were analyzed by factorial ANOVA using Statistix 8.1. When there were significant interactions, the one-way ANOVA was used, and the means were separated by least significant differences (LSDs).

3. Results

The transpiration rates were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in var. Maru 1 than those in var. Hourani at tillering. Moreover, the controls had significantly lower transpiration rates and RWCs than foliar fertilizer treatments (Table 1). At anthesis, the measured physiological parameters revealed a significant reduction in controls when compared with other foliar fertilizer treatments. However, the B + Mg treatment had a significantly higher RWC than either the B or Mg treatments (Table 1).
The main means of foliar fertilizer treatments for the growth and yield of the two wheat varieties are presented in Table 2. The number of heads (HN) and tillers (TN) per plant for var. Maru 1 was significantly higher than those for var. Hourani. Variety Maru 1 showed significantly higher grain number (GN), grain weight (GW), and 1000-grain weight (TGW) per plant (p < 0.01) than var. Hourani. The controls had significantly reduced GW, GN, and TGW per plant by 18%, 16%, and 6%, respectively, when compared with those sprayed by the B + Mg treatment. The dry matter weight (DMW) per plant was similarly affected by treatments as the GW and GN. The overall mean harvest index (HI) of var. Maru 1 was significantly higher than that of var. Hourani.
There was a significant (p < 0.05) foliar fertilizer × drought interaction effect for the GW per plant (Figure 1). The combined foliar fertilizer (B + Mg) treatment did not improve the GW under well-watered (WW) conditions when compared to the controls. However, the B + Mg treatment had significantly increased the GW per plant by 33% and 57% at tillering drought (D1) and anthesis drought (D2), respectively, when compared to the controls.

4. Discussion

In this study, foliar application was effective in improving the transpiration rate of wheat under drought. Similar findings were obtained by the authors of [9]. The response of micronutrient application to various abiotic stresses depends on the crop, growth stage, and concentration of the nutrient solution [13]. The key mechanisms affecting the ability of micronutrients and macronutrients to alleviate the effects of drought stress include enhancing water uptake and transport, regulating stomatal behavior, and transpirational water loss [14]. Our results showed that wheat transpiration at anthesis drought was lower by approximately 14% than at tillering drought. This may be due to the higher water uptake of larger root biomass during the anthesis stage. Similarly, the authors of [15] found that transpiration rates during the anthesis were higher than during the vegetative phase. Therefore, the soil water supply is more rapidly exhausted during anthesis drought.
Foliar application with combined boron and magnesium increased total chlorophyll content by SPAD at anthesis drought. These results are consistent with other studies [16,17] that indicated that Mg has a main role in chlorophyll formation and the activation of enzymes, and it may increase plant resistance to water stress. Similarly, foliar application by B increased total chlorophyll content at the late growth stages of winter wheat [9]. Thus, these findings indicated the prominence of foliar application with combined boron and magnesium to reduce the harmful effects of drought stress that often occur during anthesis.
In the current study, foliar fertilizer significantly increased the RWC of wheat under drought conditions. Similar results were obtained by [18,19], who found that the foliar application of macronutrients and micronutrients improved the RWC for some crops. The higher RWC under combined boron and magnesium might be due to higher chlorophyll formation during the drought, whereas the increase in RWC by application of foliar boron might be due to leaf membrane stability and higher resistance against abiotic stresses [7,20].
Our results also indicated significant differences between both wheat varieties in terms of yield and yield components due to a difference in the genetic makeup of the variety. It is well documented that wheat varieties grown under drought conditions demonstrate a natural genetic difference in traits related to drought tolerance [21]. Our study demonstrated that the foliar application increased the grain yield of durum wheat under different drought conditions, which may be due to the crucial role of such fertilizers in the enhancement of photosynthesis, transpiration rate, pollen viability, the number of grains per spike, and higher concentrations of these nutrients in the grain. Similar results were obtained by [9,22]. Our findings were also in agreement with the results of [9], who found that the grain yield of winter wheat was not improved by foliar applications in the absence of drought. Furthermore, the foliar application of B and Mg was more effective at anthesis drought for improving the grain yield. These results were similar to the findings of [23], who found that the foliar application of potassium was the most effective at the anthesis stage. However, ref. [22] found that the booting stage was the best time for boron application increase grain production.
In conclusion, drought stress at either the tillering or anthesis growth stage inhibits the physiological growth and yield parameters of durum wheat varieties. Yield reduction was greater during anthesis drought than during tillering. Therefore, exogenous application of B and Mg to wheat under drought alleviated the negative effects of the water deficit. Results of this pot experiment revealed that foliar application of B and Mg enhanced leaf transpiration rate and relative water contents, which, in turn, improved the crop yield of wheat. However, the foliar application of B and Mg in combination performed similar to that of a single nutrient. The results from this study show the significance of foliar application at the anthesis stage for improving wheat yield under drought conditions. Further studies are required to examine the effect of foliar application and drought on wheat yield and growth under field conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. and Y.B.K.; methodology, A.A.; software, A.A.; validation, A.A. and Y.B.K.; formal analysis, A.A.; investigation, A.A.; resources, Y.B.K.; data curation, A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A.; visualization, Y.B.K.; supervision, Y.B.K.; project administration, Y.B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This study is a part of the ‘Enhancing food security in Arabic countries’ project. The authors gratefully thank the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) for its support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Munaweera, T.I.; Jayawardana, N.U.; Rajaratnam, R.; Dissanayake, N. Modern plant biotechnology as a strategy in addressing climate change and attaining food security. Agric. Food Secur. 2022, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hussain, M.; Farooq, S.; Hasan, W.; Ul-allah, S.; Tanveer, M. Drought stress in sunflower: Physiological effects and its management through breeding and agronomic alternatives. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 201, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tyagi, M.; Pandey, G.C. Physiology of heat and drought tolerance in wheat: An overview. J. Careal Res. 2022, 14, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Caser, M.; Angiolillo, F.D.; Chitarra, W.; Lovisolo, C.; Ruffoni, B.; Pistelli, L.; Pistelli, L.; Scariot, V. Ecophysiological and phytochemical responses of Salvia sinaloensis Fern. to drought stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 84, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ru, C.; Hu, X.; Chen, D.; Song, T.W.; Wang, M.L.; Hansen, N.C. Nitrogen modulates the effects of short-term heat, drought and combined stresses after anthesis on photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism, yield, and water and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat. Water 2022, 14, 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tuiwong, P.; Lordkaew, S.; Veeradittakit, J.; Jamjod, S.; Prom-u-thai, C. Efficacy of nitrogen and zinc application at different growth stages on yield, grain zinc, and nitrogen concentration in rice. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Awasthi, S.; Chauhan, R.; Srivastava, S. The importance of beneficial and essential trace and ultratrace elements in plant nutrition, growth, and stress tolerance. In Plant Nutrition and Food Security in the Era of Climate Change; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 27–46. [Google Scholar]
  8. Waraich, E.A.; Ahmad, R.; Saifullah, M.Y.; Ashraf, E. Role of mineral nutrition in alleviation of drought stress in plants. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 764–777. [Google Scholar]
  9. Karim, M.R.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhao, R.R.; Chen, X.P.; Zhang, F.S.; Zou, C.Q. Alleviation of drought stress in winter wheat by late foliar application of zinc, boron, and manganese. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2012, 175, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cakmak, I.; Yazici, A.M. Magnesium: A forgotten element in crop production. Better Crops 2010, 94, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zadoks, J.C.; Chang, T.T.; Konzak, C.F. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 1974, 14, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Slatyer, R.O. Plant-Water Relationships; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1967; p. 366. [Google Scholar]
  13. Siddiqui, H.; Singh, P.; Arif, Y.; Sami, F.; Naaz, R.; Hayat, S. Role of micronutrients in providing abiotic stress tolerance. In Microbial Biofertilizers and Micronutrient Availability; Khan, S.T., Malik, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, M.; Wang, R.; Mur, L.A.J. Functions of silicon in plant drought stress responses. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aldahadha, A.; Warwick, N.W.M.; Backhouse, D. Water relations and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) exposed to interactions of drought and fungal root diseases (Rhizoctonia and Pythium). Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thalooth, A.T.; Tawfik, M.M.; Magda, M.H. A comparative study on the effect of foliar application of zinc, potassium and magnesium on growth, yield and some chemical constituents of mungbean plants grown under water stress conditions. World J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 2, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  17. Saad, A.O.M.; El-Kholy, M.A. Response of some faba bean to phosphorus and magnesium fertilization. Egypt. J. Agron. 2000, 22, 19–32. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wasaya, A.; Shabir, M.S.; Hussain, M.; Ansar, M.; Aziz, A.; Hassan, W.; Ahmad, I. Foliar application of zinc and boron improved the productivity and net returns of maize grown under rainfed conditions of pothwar plateau. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 17, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahmad, S.; Kamran, M.; Ding, R.; Meng, X.; Wang, H.; Ahmad, I.; Fahad, S.; Han, Q. Exogenous melatonin confers drought stress by promoting plant growth, photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant defense system of maize seedlings. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sayed, S.A. Impacts of boron application on maize plants growing under flooded and unflooded conditions. Biol. Plant. 1998, 41, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Budak, H.; Kantar, M.; Kurtoglu, K.Y. Drought tolerance in modern and wild wheat. Sci. World J. 2013, 13, 548246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abdel-Motagally, F.M.F.; El-Zohri, M. Improvement of wheat yield grown under drought stress by boron foliar application at different growth stages. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2018, 17, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aown, M.; Raza, S.; Saleem, M.F.; Anjum, S.A.; Khaliq, T.; Wahid, M.A. Foliar application of potassium under water deficit conditions improved the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2012, 22, 431–437. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Foliar fertilizer x drought interaction effect on grain weight per plant. Columns with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 using the LSD test. Error bars show standard errors; n = 3.
Figure 1. Foliar fertilizer x drought interaction effect on grain weight per plant. Columns with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 using the LSD test. Error bars show standard errors; n = 3.
Blsf 30 00015 g001
Table 1. Mean values of transpiration rate (µg cm−2 s−1), total chlorophyll content by SPAD, and relative water content (RWC%) for two durum wheat varieties and four foliar fertilizer treatments under the beginning of tillering and anthesis droughts (Day 0) and end of tillering and anthesis droughts (Day 7). According to the least significant difference (LSD) test, different letters within the same columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). B: boron; Mg: magnesium; and B + Mg: combined boron and magnesium.
Table 1. Mean values of transpiration rate (µg cm−2 s−1), total chlorophyll content by SPAD, and relative water content (RWC%) for two durum wheat varieties and four foliar fertilizer treatments under the beginning of tillering and anthesis droughts (Day 0) and end of tillering and anthesis droughts (Day 7). According to the least significant difference (LSD) test, different letters within the same columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). B: boron; Mg: magnesium; and B + Mg: combined boron and magnesium.
VarietyDroughtTranspiration Rate SPADRWC
TilleringAnthesisTilleringAnthesisTilleringAnthesis
HouraniDay 04.9210.8452.0653.3991.9392.28
Day 72.822.8846.4743.1171.4950.65
Variety mean 3.87 B6.8 A49.26 A48.25 A81.71 A71.47 A
Maru 1Day 04.7810.5952.1653.5392.3492.09
Day 73.832.8246.1144.3472.0554.21
Variety mean 4.30 A6.70 A49.13 A48.93 A82.19 A73.15 A
Foliar treatment
BDay 04.8210.7850.9554.3392.1892.55
Day 73.392.9248.1043.4579.3952.48
Treatment mean 4.11 A6.85 A49.53 A48.89 A85.78 A72.52 B
MgDay 04.8610.8752.8554.0392.7990.97
Day 73.733.2545.3244.4272.8955.50
Treatment mean 4.29 A7.06 A49.08 A49.23 A82.84 A73.23 B
B + MgDay 04.7911.0153.0753.2891.8492.53
Day 73.993.8547.5246.8373.2662.03
Treatment mean 4.39 A7.43 A50.29 A50.06 A82.55 A77.28 A
ControlDay 04.9410.2151.5752.1891.7492.69
Day 72.181.3844.2240.2061.5239.72
Treatment mean 3.56 B5.79 B47.89 A46.19 B76.63 B66.21 C
LSD (0.05)
Variety 0.330.532.061.112.852.60
Foliar treatment 0.470.762.921.574.033.68
Table 2. The main effect of wheat varieties and foliar fertilizer treatments on growth and yield components. B: boron; Mg: magnesium; B + Mg: combined boron and magnesium; TN: number of tillers per plant; HN: number of heads per plant; GN: number of grains per plant; TGW: 1000-grain weight; GW: grain weight per plant; DMW: shoot dry weight per plant excluding grain; HI: harvest index; and LSD: least significant difference at p < 0.05. Figures labeled with the same letter in each column are not significantly different.
Table 2. The main effect of wheat varieties and foliar fertilizer treatments on growth and yield components. B: boron; Mg: magnesium; B + Mg: combined boron and magnesium; TN: number of tillers per plant; HN: number of heads per plant; GN: number of grains per plant; TGW: 1000-grain weight; GW: grain weight per plant; DMW: shoot dry weight per plant excluding grain; HI: harvest index; and LSD: least significant difference at p < 0.05. Figures labeled with the same letter in each column are not significantly different.
Main EffectTNHNGNTGW (g)GW (g)DMW (g)HI
Variety
Hourani9.0 b8.5 b310.1 b37.3 b12.1 b19.1 b0.37 b
Maru 19.8 a9.3 a452.8 a42.6 a20.1 a22.3 a0.46 a
Foliar treatment
B9.5 a9.1 a396.4 a40.3 b16.8 a21.3 a0.42 a
Mg9.5 a9.0 a383.1 a42.0 a16.8 a21.4 a0.42 a
B + Mg9.3 a9.0 a405.2 a40.0 b16.9 a21.9 a0.42 a
Control9.0 a8.5 a340.9 b37.4 c13.8 b18.1 b0.40 a
LSD (0.05)
Variety0.340.3320.841.100.731.290.019
Foliar treatment0.490.4729.481.561.041.820.027
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aldahadha, A.; Bani Khalaf, Y. Evaluating the Synergistic Effects of Foliar Boron and Magnesium Application for Mitigating Drought in Wheat. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 30, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-15964

AMA Style

Aldahadha A, Bani Khalaf Y. Evaluating the Synergistic Effects of Foliar Boron and Magnesium Application for Mitigating Drought in Wheat. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2024; 30(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-15964

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aldahadha, Abdallah, and Yahya Bani Khalaf. 2024. "Evaluating the Synergistic Effects of Foliar Boron and Magnesium Application for Mitigating Drought in Wheat" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 30, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2023-15964

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop