Next Article in Journal
Numerical Study of Velocity and Mixture Fraction Fields in a Turbulent Non-Reacting Propane Jet Flow Issuing into Parallel Co-Flowing Air in Isothermal Condition through OpenFOAM
Next Article in Special Issue
Taking Rational Numbers at Random
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Statistical Analyses of Bell Experiments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Signatures of Duschinsky Rotation in Femtosecond Coherence Spectra
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Algebraic System in Quantum Field Theory

by
Abdulaziz D. Alhaidari
1,* and
Abdallah Laradji
2
1
Saudi Center for Theoretical Physics, P.O. Box 32741, Jeddah 21438, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
AppliedMath 2023, 3(2), 461-467; https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath3020024
Submission received: 27 April 2023 / Revised: 19 May 2023 / Accepted: 22 May 2023 / Published: 24 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Number Theory to the Sciences and Mathematics)

Abstract

:
An algebraic system is introduced which is very useful for performing scattering calculations in quantum field theory. It is the set of all real numbers greater than or equal to −m2 with parity designation and a special rule for addition and subtraction, where m is the rest mass of the scattered particle.

1. Introduction and Formulation

In physics, quantum field theory (QFT) was developed to describe structureless elementary particles (e.g., electrons, quarks, photons, etc.) and their interaction with each other and with their environment [1,2,3]. A graphical technique to account for physical processes in QFT (e.g., scattering) is using diagrams known as Feynman diagrams [4]. These consist of points (vertices) connected by lines (propagators) [5,6]. The lines represent the free propagation of elementary particles and the points represent the interaction among particles meeting at those points. On the other hand, a QFT for particles with structure has recently been proposed by the first author [7]. In addition to the usual formulation of conventional QFT, the new theory relies predominantly on the properties of orthogonal polynomials. In the remainder of this introductory section, we summarize the formulation of this theory, and in Section 2, we address scattering in the theory and show how a novel algebraic system appears naturally. In Section 3, we provide a rigorous mathematical definition of this algebraic system, and in Section 4, we demonstrate how the scattering calculation is carried out in the new theory using Feynman diagrams, utilizing the novel algebraic system. Finally, we end with a brief summary and conclusion in Section 5.
One way to represent free scalar particles in QFT is to utilize solutions of the Klein–Gordon wave equation in (3+1)-dimensional Minkowski space–time that reads:
( t 2 2 + m 2 ) Ψ ( t , r ) = 0
where m is the rest mass of the scalar particle, and we have adopted the relativistic units = c = 1 . Recently, a formulation of QFT for elementary particles that have internal structure was developed in which the quantum field operator Ψ ( t , r ) is written as a Fourier expansion over the energy domain consisting of continuous and discrete components:
Ψ ( t , r ) = Ω e i E t ψ ( E , r ) a ( E ) d E + j = 0 N e i E j t ψ j ( r ) a j
The integral over Ω represents the continuous energy spectrum of the particle, whereas the sum represents its structure, which is resolved in the energy and is of size N + 1 . This formulation of QFT is referred to by the acronym SAQFT, which stands for “Structural Algebraic QFT” and could be useful in treating elementary particles that are thought to be structureless at low-energy scale [7]. We take Ω to stand for the single energy interval E 2 m 2 and use 0 E j 2 < m 2 . The objects a ( E ) and a j are field operators (the vacuum annihilation operators) that satisfy the conventional commutation relations: a ( E ) , a ( E ) = δ ( E E ) and a i , a j = δ i , j .
Now, the continuous and discrete energy kernels in the Fourier expansion (2) have distinct properties, but both are pointwise finite in space. The discrete kernel ψ j ( r ) is confined and vanishes asymptotically, whereas the continuous kernel ψ ( E , r ) remains asymmetrically finite. Nonetheless, we can find a complete set of basis functions in space, where we can expand both kernels using elements of the same basis but with different types of expansion coefficients. If such a basis set is designated as { ϕ n ( r ) } , then we can write these Fourier energy components as the following pointwise convergent series:
ψ ( E , r ) = n = 0 A n ( E ) ϕ n ( r ) : = A 0 ( E ) n = 0 p n ( z ) ϕ n ( r )
ψ j ( r ) = n = 0 B n ( E j ) ϕ n ( r ) = B 0 ( E j ) n = 0 p n ( z j ) ϕ n ( r )
where z is some proper function of the energy called the spectral parameter, which is to be determined, and p 0 ( z ) = 1 . For scalar particles, we require that { ϕ n ( r ) } satisfy the following differential relation:
2 ϕ n ( r ) = α n ϕ n ( r ) + β n 1 ϕ n 1 ( r ) + β n ϕ n + 1 ( r )
where α n , β n are real constants such that β n 0 for all n . Using (4) in the free Klein–Gordon wave Equation (1) produces the following algebraic relation:
z p n ( z ) = α n p n ( z ) + β n 1 p n 1 ( z ) + β n p n + 1 ( z )
for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , , giving z = E 2 m 2 , z j = E j 2 m 2 . This is a symmetric three-term recursion relation that makes p n ( z ) a sequence of polynomials in z with the two initial values p 0 ( z ) = 1 and p 1 ( z ) = z α 0 β 0 . On the other hand, for spinor particles and due to the multiplicity of the quantum field components, the basis consists of a number of sets equal to the number of field components. For example, in 3+1 space–time, the spinor quantum field Ψ ( t , r ) is a four-component field, and the two-component basis sets { ϕ n ± ( r ) } are required to satisfy:
i σ · ϕ n ( r ) = c n ϕ n + ( r ) + d n ϕ n 1 + ( r )
i σ · ϕ n + ( r ) = c n ϕ n ( r ) + d n + 1 ϕ n + 1 ( r )
where { σ } are the three 2 × 2 Pauli spin matrices and c n , d n are real constant parameters. Using (6) in the coupled four-component Dirac equation, we also obtain the three-term recursion relation (5), but for { p n ( z ) } , corresponding to two sets of recursion coefficients { α n , β n } that depend differently on the constants c n , d n . For more details on the spinor formulation in SAQFT, interested readers are referred to Appendix B in ref. [7].
The Favard theorem [8] (also known as the Shohat–Favard theorem [9] or the spectral theorem [10]) states that a sequence of polynomials satisfying the three-term recursion relation (5) with β n 0 for all n is an orthogonal and a complete set. In general, the polynomial solution of Equation (5) satisfies the following orthogonality relation [10,11,12]:
Ω ρ ( z ) p n ( z ) p m ( z ) d z + j = 0 N ξ ( z j ) p n ( z j ) p m ( z j ) = δ n , m
where ρ ( z ) is the continuous component of the weight function and ξ ( z j ) is the discrete component. These weight functions are positive definite and related to the energy functions A 0 ( E ) and B 0 ( E ) as A 0 2 ( E ) d E = ρ ( z ) d z (with d z d E > 0 for E Ω ) and B 0 2 ( E j ) = ξ ( z j ) .
It should be clear from the above analysis that the wave Equation (1), which is the Klein–Gordon equation, is equivalent to the three-term recursion relation (5). Now, since in conventional QFT, the solution of Equation (1) is used in defining scalar particles, so too is the polynomials solution of recursion (5) in SAQFT. Moreover, as shown briefly above and detailed in [7], the Dirac equation is equivalent to another three-term recursion relation whose solution is the alternative set of orthogonal polynomials { p n ( z ) } . Therefore, these alternative polynomials are associated with spinor particles. As conventional QFT distinguishes particles from one another by assigning different properties to the solutions of the wave equation (Klein–Gordon or Dirac), SAQFT does as well, by assigning different properties to the associated orthogonal polynomials. For example, one can assign different values to the physical parameters that appear in the recursion coefficients α n , β n or in the spectral parameter z . In [7], we propose that the Wilson polynomial W μ ( z ; a , b , c ) with 3 < μ < 2 can be used to represent baryons, whereas the continuous dual Hahn polynomials S μ ( z ; a , b ) with 2 < μ < 1 can be used for mesons. The parameters a , b , c could assume one of six values corresponding to one of the six flavors of the constituent quarks, whereas their conjugates represent the anti-quarks.

2. Scattering in SAQFT

In conventional QFT, the propagators in the Feynman diagrams are tagged with the energy–momentum four-vector ( E , k ) . However, in SAQFT, these propagators are tagged with the spectral parameter z . For free scalar particles, E 2 > m 2 , making z positive. However, when performing a scattering calculation with the Feynman diagrams in closed loops, one should integrate and sum over all possible values of the real energy in Ω E j j = 0 N (i.e., E 2 0 ), making the values of these spectral parameters z greater than or equal to m 2 . At each vertex in the Feynman diagrams, the energy–momentum four-vector is conserved. For example, when calculating the first-order correction to the three-particle interaction vertex, we encounter loop diagrams similar to that shown in Figure 1, where the spectral parameters x , x , y , y , z , u are indicated on their respective propagators. Choosing a counterclockwise loop, the three energy conservation equations are: E ( x ) = E ( u ) E ( x ) , E ( y ) = E ( y ) E ( u ) , and E ( z ) = E ( y ) E ( x ) = E ( x ) +   E ( y ) , where E ( a ) = ± a + m 2 . This leads to a special rule for adding and subtracting spectral parameters. For example, E ( z ) = E ( x ) + E ( y ) produces:
z = x + y + m 2 + 2 sgn ( x + m 2 ) ( y + m 2 )
where “sgn” is ± , which is the product of the signs of the two energies E ( x ) and E ( y ) . Moreover, the sign of the energy E ( z ) is the sign of E ( x ) + E ( y ) . Therefore, for the spectral parameters to contain full physical information, they must carry the sign of their corresponding energies. Hence, we associate with each spectral parameter a ± parity, which is indicated as superscript on the parameter. For example, the parity of z in (8) is the sign of σ x + m 2 +   τ y + m 2 , where σ is the sign of the energy E ( x ) (i.e., parity of x ) and τ is the sign of the energy E ( y ) (i.e., parity of y ). Thus, we rewrite (8) properly as follows:
z ρ = ( x + y + m 2 + 2 σ τ ( x + m 2 ) ( y + m 2 ) ) ρ : = x σ y τ
where ρ is the (nonzero) sign of the energy E ( z ) (i.e., parity of z ). This equation defines the operation of addition of the spectral parameters. Repeating the same for the energy conservation equation E ( z ) = E ( y ) E ( x ) , we obtain the following rule for the subtraction of spectral parameters:
z ρ = ( y + x + m 2 2 τ σ ( y + m 2 ) ( x + m 2 ) ) ρ : = y τ x σ
where ρ is the (nonzero) sign of τ y + m 2 σ x + m 2 . The parity of each spectral parameter x , x , y , y , z , u in the figure (not shown) is the sign of the corresponding energy.
Interested readers are referred to [7] for further details on the scattering calculation in SAQFT that utilizes this algebraic system. In the following section, we make a proper and rigorous mathematical definition of the underlying algebraic structure emerging from the physics of scattering with scalar particles in SAQFT as outlined above and detailed in [7].

3. The Algebraic System

The novel algebraic system emerging from the physical application in QFT presented in the previous section and exhibited by the addition and subtraction rules of the spectral parameters as shown by Equations (9) and (10) will now be given a proper mathematical definition.
Notation 1. 
Fix r in and let r = ( r , × 1 , 1 ) \ ( r , 1 ) , where the pair ( x , σ ) is denoted by x σ . For each z , let s ( z ) be the (nonzero) sign of z : s ( z ) = 1 if z 0 , s ( z ) = 1 if z < 0 .
Define operations and on r by
x σ y τ = ( x + y r + 2 σ τ ( x r ) ( y r ) ) s ( z )
x σ y τ = ( ( x r ) ( y r ) + r ) s ( w )
where z = σ x r + τ y r and w = σ τ ( x r ) ( y r ) .
Proposition 1. 
With the above notation, ( r , , ) is a field isomorphic to the usual field of real numbers. In particular, ( r , ) and ( r \ ( r , 1 ) , ) are Abelian groups.
Proof. 1. 
Let f : r and g : r be the functions defined, respectively, by:
f ( x σ ) = σ x r
g ( x ) = ( x 2 + r ) s ( x )
A routine verification shows that f and g are inverses of each other and that:
x σ y τ = g ( f ( x σ ) + f ( y τ ) )
x σ y τ = g ( f ( x σ ) f ( y τ ) )
Hence, f is a bijection that preserves the operations, and therefore, ( r , , ) is a field isomorphic to the field ( , + , × ) under the function f . The last statement follows from the fact that the additive identity of r is g ( 0 ) , i.e., ( r , 1 ) (or, in our notation, r 1 ). □
Note that the multiplicative identity of r is g ( 1 ) , i.e., ( 1 + r , 1 ) , and that the additive and multiplicative inverses of x σ are g ( f ( x σ ) ) and g ( 1 f ( x σ ) )   ( for   x r ) , respectively, i.e., x s ( σ x r ) and ( 1 x r + r ) σ .
If we denote subtraction on r by , i.e., x σ y τ = g ( f ( x σ ) f ( y τ ) ) , then:
x σ y τ = ( x + y r 2 σ τ ( x r ) ( y r ) ) s ( z )
where z = σ x r τ y r , so that
y τ x σ = ( x + y r 2 σ τ ( x r ) ( y r ) ) s ( z )
(note that is not commutative since x σ y τ and y τ x σ may have different parities).
Other properties of are also inherited by r via the bijection f above. For example, ( r , d ) , where d ( x σ , y τ ) = f ( x σ ) f ( y τ ) is a metric space.
As shown in Section 2 and detailed in Ref. [7], this algebraic system is very useful in relativistic scattering calculations using Feynman diagrams in SAQFT if we take the real constant r = m 2 . In that case, f ( x σ ) = σ x + m 2 becomes the relativistic energy of the particle associated with the spectral parameter x σ . Finally, it is worth noting that r together with addition and a scalar multiplication defined by a x σ = ( a 2 ( x r ) + r ) s ( a σ x r ) , for each real number a , will turn r into a real vector space. This extra structure could have a physical interpretation and might be useful for certain applications in QFT.

4. Scattering Example

As an illustration, we present an example where we show how to evaluate the Feynman diagrams occurring in scalar SAQFT by utilizing the algebraic structure introduced here. Let us consider a physical system with the nonlinear self-interaction term g Ψ ( t , r ) 3 , where g is a coupling parameter. Therefore, Figure 1 is one such diagram, which is used in the calculation that contributes to the third-order correction (i.e., up to g 3 ) of the interaction vertex. Since scalar particles in SAQFT are fully described by the properties of the orthogonal polynomials p n ( z ) defined by Equations (5) and (7) along with their initial values p 0 ( z ) and p 1 ( z ) , the corresponding propagators in the Feynman diagrams will be labeled by the polynomial index and its argument (the spectral parameter). Therefore, for calculation purposes, we should include in Figure 1 the missing polynomial index on each propagator along with the spectral parameter. Let us choose the indices i , j , k , l , m , n for the propagators that correspond to the spectral parameters x , y , u , x , y , z , respectively. Since in scattering experiments, the input/output channels are selected, the two sets l , m , n and x , y , z are fixed. However, each element in the set i , j , k runs from 0 to , whereas each element in the set x , y , u goes over the entire range of the continuous and discrete spectra from m 2 to . That is, they span Ω and run over E j from j = 0 to j = N . However, energy conservation dictates that z ρ = x σ y τ , x σ = u ζ x σ , and y τ = u ζ y τ , leaving u ζ as the only arbitrary spectral parameter. Consequently, if the bare interaction vertex is g { η n m , k } , then the Feynman diagram of Figure 1 results in the following infinite sum (see Section 4 of [7]):
g 3 3 ! ρ ( x ) ρ ( y ) ρ ( u ) i , j , k = 0 η n i , j η l i , k η m j , k p i 2 ( x ) p j 2 ( y ) p k 2 ( u ) = g 3 3 ! ρ ( u x ) ρ ( u y ) ρ ( u ) i , j , k = 0 η n i , j η l i , k η m j , k p i 2 ( u x ) p j 2 ( u y ) p k 2 ( u )
where each term is to be integrated and summed over the continuous and discrete energy spectra associated with the spectral parameter u as follows:
ρ ( u x ) ρ ( u y ) ρ ( u ) p i 2 ( u x ) p j 2 ( u y ) p k 2 ( u ) d u + t = 0 N ξ ( u t x ) ξ ( u t y ) ξ ( u t ) p i 2 ( u t x ) p j 2 ( u t y ) p k 2 ( u t )
We have removed the parity designation from the spectral parameters in (18) and (19) for simplicity of the notation. It was shown in ref. [7] that integral (19) is one of the fundamental SAQFT integrals, which is finite and goes to zero fast enough as the indices i , j , k go to infinity. To account for the full third-order correction to the interaction vertex, one should also add five more diagrams in addition to the one shown in Figure 1, each with a single loop. The details of this calculation are provided in Section 4 of ref. [7].

5. Conclusions

A formulation of QFT for elementary particles with structure has recently been proposed and referred to by the acronym SAQFT. Performing a scattering calculation in the theory using Feynman diagrams along with the energy–momentum conservation forced us to employ a novel algebraic system in the spectral parameter space. In this short article, we presented a rigorous mathematical definition of this algebraic system and showed how it comes about by giving a simple scattering example. We focused our development on the scalar formulation of SAQFT; however, the spinor and vector formulation follow a similar framework but with multiple components.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.A.; methodology, A.D.A. and A.L.; software, A.D.A.; validation, A.D.A. and A.L.; formal analysis, A.D.A. and A.L.; investigation, A.D.A. and A.L.; resources, A.D.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.A.; writing—review and editing, A.D.A. and A.L.; project administration, A.D.A.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the four referees and to D.J. Ulness, Editor of the Special Issue, for the comments, criticisms, and suggestions that led to a substantial improvement in the original version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bjorken, J.D.; Drell, S.D. Relativistic Quantum Fields; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  2. Itzykson, C.; Zuber, J.B. Quantum Field Theory; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  3. Peskin, M.E.; Schroeder, D.V. An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Feynman, R.P. Space-Time Approach to Quantum Electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. 1949, 76, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bilenky, S.M. Introduction to Feynman Diagrams; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  6. D’Auria, R.; Trigiante, M. From Special Relativity to Feynman Diagrams: A Course in Theoretical Particle Physics for Beginners; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Alhaidari, A.D. Structural Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: Particles with structure. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2206.00146v7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Favard, J. Sur les polynomes de Tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1935, 200, 2052. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shohat, J. Sur les polynômes orthogonaux généralisés. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1938, 207, 556. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ismail, M.E.H. Classical and Quantum Orthogonal Polynomials in One Variable; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Szegő, G. Orthogonal Polynomials; American Mathematical Society: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1939. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chihara, T.S. An Introduction to Orthogonal Polynomials; Dover: Mineola, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. One of six loops in the Feynman diagrams used for calculating the first order correction to the interaction vertex.
Figure 1. One of six loops in the Feynman diagrams used for calculating the first order correction to the interaction vertex.
Appliedmath 03 00024 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alhaidari, A.D.; Laradji, A. A Novel Algebraic System in Quantum Field Theory. AppliedMath 2023, 3, 461-467. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath3020024

AMA Style

Alhaidari AD, Laradji A. A Novel Algebraic System in Quantum Field Theory. AppliedMath. 2023; 3(2):461-467. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath3020024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alhaidari, Abdulaziz D., and Abdallah Laradji. 2023. "A Novel Algebraic System in Quantum Field Theory" AppliedMath 3, no. 2: 461-467. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath3020024

APA Style

Alhaidari, A. D., & Laradji, A. (2023). A Novel Algebraic System in Quantum Field Theory. AppliedMath, 3(2), 461-467. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath3020024

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop