1. Introduction and Formulation
In physics, quantum field theory (QFT) was developed to describe structureless elementary particles (e.g., electrons, quarks, photons, etc.) and their interaction with each other and with their environment [
1,
2,
3]. A graphical technique to account for physical processes in QFT (e.g., scattering) is using diagrams known as Feynman diagrams [
4]. These consist of points (vertices) connected by lines (propagators) [
5,
6]. The lines represent the free propagation of elementary particles and the points represent the interaction among particles meeting at those points. On the other hand, a QFT for particles with structure has recently been proposed by the first author [
7]. In addition to the usual formulation of conventional QFT, the new theory relies predominantly on the properties of orthogonal polynomials. In the remainder of this introductory section, we summarize the formulation of this theory, and in
Section 2, we address scattering in the theory and show how a novel algebraic system appears naturally. In
Section 3, we provide a rigorous mathematical definition of this algebraic system, and in
Section 4, we demonstrate how the scattering calculation is carried out in the new theory using Feynman diagrams, utilizing the novel algebraic system. Finally, we end with a brief summary and conclusion in
Section 5.
One way to represent free scalar particles in QFT is to utilize solutions of the Klein–Gordon wave equation in (3+1)-dimensional Minkowski space–time that reads:
where
is the rest mass of the scalar particle, and we have adopted the relativistic units
. Recently, a formulation of QFT for elementary particles that have internal structure was developed in which the quantum field operator
is written as a Fourier expansion over the energy domain consisting of continuous and discrete components:
The integral over
represents the continuous energy spectrum of the particle, whereas the sum represents its structure, which is resolved in the energy and is of size
. This formulation of QFT is referred to by the acronym SAQFT, which stands for “Structural Algebraic QFT” and could be useful in treating elementary particles that are thought to be structureless at low-energy scale [
7]. We take
to stand for the single energy interval
and use
. The objects
and
are field operators (the vacuum annihilation operators) that satisfy the conventional commutation relations:
and
.
Now, the continuous and discrete energy kernels in the Fourier expansion (2) have distinct properties, but both are pointwise finite in space. The discrete kernel
is confined and vanishes asymptotically, whereas the continuous kernel
remains asymmetrically finite. Nonetheless, we can find a complete set of basis functions in space, where we can expand both kernels using elements of the same basis but with different types of expansion coefficients. If such a basis set is designated as
, then we can write these Fourier energy components as the following pointwise convergent series:
where
is some proper function of the energy called the spectral parameter, which is to be determined, and
. For scalar particles, we require that
satisfy the following differential relation:
where
are real constants such that
for all
. Using (4) in the free Klein–Gordon wave Equation (1) produces the following algebraic relation:
for
, giving
,
. This is a symmetric three-term recursion relation that makes
a sequence of polynomials in
with the two initial values
and
. On the other hand, for spinor particles and due to the multiplicity of the quantum field components, the basis consists of a number of sets equal to the number of field components. For example, in 3+1 space–time, the spinor quantum field
is a four-component field, and the two-component basis sets
are required to satisfy:
where
are the three
Pauli spin matrices and
are real constant parameters. Using (6) in the coupled four-component Dirac equation, we also obtain the three-term recursion relation (5), but for
, corresponding to two sets of recursion coefficients
that depend differently on the constants
. For more details on the spinor formulation in SAQFT, interested readers are referred to Appendix B in ref. [
7].
The Favard theorem [
8] (also known as the Shohat–Favard theorem [
9] or the spectral theorem [
10]) states that a sequence of polynomials satisfying the three-term recursion relation (5) with
for all
is an orthogonal and a complete set. In general, the polynomial solution of Equation (5) satisfies the following orthogonality relation [
10,
11,
12]:
where
is the continuous component of the weight function and
is the discrete component. These weight functions are positive definite and related to the energy functions
and
as
(with
for
) and
.
It should be clear from the above analysis that the wave Equation (1), which is the Klein–Gordon equation, is equivalent to the three-term recursion relation (5). Now, since in conventional QFT, the solution of Equation (1) is used in defining scalar particles, so too is the polynomials solution of recursion (5) in SAQFT. Moreover, as shown briefly above and detailed in [
7], the Dirac equation is equivalent to another three-term recursion relation whose solution is the alternative set of orthogonal polynomials
. Therefore, these alternative polynomials are associated with spinor particles. As conventional QFT distinguishes particles from one another by assigning different properties to the solutions of the wave equation (Klein–Gordon or Dirac), SAQFT does as well, by assigning different properties to the associated orthogonal polynomials. For example, one can assign different values to the physical parameters that appear in the recursion coefficients
or in the spectral parameter
. In [
7], we propose that the Wilson polynomial
with
can be used to represent baryons, whereas the continuous dual Hahn polynomials
with
can be used for mesons. The parameters
could assume one of six values corresponding to one of the six flavors of the constituent quarks, whereas their conjugates represent the anti-quarks.
2. Scattering in SAQFT
In conventional QFT, the propagators in the Feynman diagrams are tagged with the energy–momentum four-vector
. However, in SAQFT, these propagators are tagged with the spectral parameter
. For free scalar particles,
, making
positive. However, when performing a scattering calculation with the Feynman diagrams in closed loops, one should integrate and sum over all possible values of the real energy in
(i.e.,
), making the values of these spectral parameters
greater than or equal to
. At each vertex in the Feynman diagrams, the energy–momentum four-vector is conserved. For example, when calculating the first-order correction to the three-particle interaction vertex, we encounter loop diagrams similar to that shown in
Figure 1, where the spectral parameters
are indicated on their respective propagators. Choosing a counterclockwise loop, the three energy conservation equations are:
,
, and
, where
. This leads to a special rule for adding and subtracting spectral parameters. For example,
produces:
where “
sgn” is
, which is the product of the signs of the two energies
and
. Moreover, the sign of the energy
is the sign of
. Therefore, for the spectral parameters to contain full physical information, they must carry the sign of their corresponding energies. Hence, we associate with each spectral parameter a
parity, which is indicated as superscript on the parameter. For example, the parity of
in (8) is the sign of
, where
is the sign of the energy
(i.e., parity of
) and
is the sign of the energy
(i.e., parity of
). Thus, we rewrite (8) properly as follows:
where
is the (nonzero) sign of the energy
(i.e., parity of
). This equation defines the operation of addition of the spectral parameters. Repeating the same for the energy conservation equation
, we obtain the following rule for the subtraction of spectral parameters:
where
is the (nonzero) sign of
. The parity of each spectral parameter
in the figure (not shown) is the sign of the corresponding energy.
Interested readers are referred to [
7] for further details on the scattering calculation in SAQFT that utilizes this algebraic system. In the following section, we make a proper and rigorous mathematical definition of the underlying algebraic structure emerging from the physics of scattering with scalar particles in SAQFT as outlined above and detailed in [
7].
3. The Algebraic System
The novel algebraic system emerging from the physical application in QFT presented in the previous section and exhibited by the addition and subtraction rules of the spectral parameters as shown by Equations (9) and (10) will now be given a proper mathematical definition.
Notation 1. Fix in and let , where the pair is denoted by . For each , let be the (nonzero) sign of : if , if .
Define operations
and
on
by
where
and
.
Proposition 1. With the above notation, is a field isomorphic to the usual field of real numbers. In particular, and are Abelian groups.
Proof. 1. Let and be the functions defined, respectively, by:
A routine verification shows that
and
are inverses of each other and that:
Hence, is a bijection that preserves the operations, and therefore, is a field isomorphic to the field under the function . The last statement follows from the fact that the additive identity of is , i.e., (or, in our notation, ). □
Note that the multiplicative identity of is , i.e., , and that the additive and multiplicative inverses of are and respectively, i.e., and .
If we denote subtraction on
by
, i.e.,
, then:
where
, so that
(note that
is not commutative since
and
may have different parities).
Other properties of are also inherited by via the bijection above. For example, , where is a metric space.
As shown in
Section 2 and detailed in Ref. [
7], this algebraic system is very useful in relativistic scattering calculations using Feynman diagrams in SAQFT if we take the real constant
. In that case,
becomes the relativistic energy of the particle associated with the spectral parameter
. Finally, it is worth noting that
together with addition
and a scalar multiplication
defined by
, for each real number
, will turn
into a real vector space. This extra structure could have a physical interpretation and might be useful for certain applications in QFT.
4. Scattering Example
As an illustration, we present an example where we show how to evaluate the Feynman diagrams occurring in scalar SAQFT by utilizing the algebraic structure introduced here. Let us consider a physical system with the nonlinear self-interaction term
, where
is a coupling parameter. Therefore,
Figure 1 is one such diagram, which is used in the calculation that contributes to the third-order correction (i.e., up to
) of the interaction vertex. Since scalar particles in SAQFT are fully described by the properties of the orthogonal polynomials
defined by Equations (5) and (7) along with their initial values
and
, the corresponding propagators in the Feynman diagrams will be labeled by the polynomial index and its argument (the spectral parameter). Therefore, for calculation purposes, we should include in
Figure 1 the missing polynomial index on each propagator along with the spectral parameter. Let us choose the indices
for the propagators that correspond to the spectral parameters
, respectively. Since in scattering experiments, the input/output channels are selected, the two sets
and
are fixed. However, each element in the set
runs from 0 to
, whereas each element in the set
goes over the entire range of the continuous and discrete spectra from
to
. That is, they span
and run over
from
to
. However, energy conservation dictates that
,
, and
, leaving
as the only arbitrary spectral parameter. Consequently, if the bare interaction vertex is
, then the Feynman diagram of
Figure 1 results in the following infinite sum (see
Section 4 of [
7]):
where each term is to be integrated and summed over the continuous and discrete energy spectra associated with the spectral parameter
as follows:
We have removed the parity designation from the spectral parameters in (18) and (19) for simplicity of the notation. It was shown in ref. [
7] that integral (19) is one of the fundamental SAQFT integrals, which is finite and goes to zero fast enough as the indices
go to infinity. To account for the full third-order correction to the interaction vertex, one should also add five more diagrams in addition to the one shown in
Figure 1, each with a single loop. The details of this calculation are provided in
Section 4 of ref. [
7].