Sustaining Citizen Science in Academic Libraries: The Vital Role of Collaboration

Abstract

The paper sought to examine the role of collaboration in sustaining citizen science activities and projects in academic libraries. The study applied a quantitative approach and a survey design to assess knowledge and understanding of citizen science by academic librarians to advance research relevant to SDGs. A standardised questionnaire was distributed to 185 academic librarians affiliated with the Higher Education and Libraries Interest Group (HELIG). The survey yielded a response rate of 34% since only 63 academic librarians volunteered to participate in the completion of the questionnaire. Data was analysed using SPSS version 29. Findings revealed that citizen science is a new concept in academic libraries in South Africa. To advance the use of citizen science in contributing towards SDGs, academic librarians need to raise awareness, foster collaborations, and initiate advocacy efforts to promote and support citizen science activities. The research further revealed that a work-integrated learning and community engagement department should be established within the library to advocate for citizen science activities. There is a need to visit schools to introduce citizen science at the grassroots level to increase the visibility of the field and to lay a foundation for scientific literacy at an early stage. Although the research setting was in academic libraries, for future research, it will be beneficial to conduct such a study in a public library setting to achieve varying perspectives from the community members where the concept of citizen science emanates.

1. Introduction

Citizen science is a field of study where experienced researchers involve community members to collect data for research projects [1] as well as participate in the analysis and reporting on the project results [2]. Public participation in scientific projects via citizen science allows community members to actively engage in resolving community problems and take charge of their environments. The objective of citizen science is to democratize science as community members learn about science and how to solve science-related problems [3].

Within the context of developing countries, citizen science aims to foster collaboration by bringing scientists and members of the public together to find solutions to local challenges. Additionally, researchers collaborate with community members in citizen science projects to increase and expand the impact of research. As one of the eight priorities to advance open science [4] (OSPP-REC, 2018), citizen science data plays a role in the advancement of research to strengthen and develop communities. In its nature, open science promotes open and accessible knowledge and emphasises sharing through collaboration [5]. At the centre of sharing and collaboration lie scientific knowledge, dialogues with knowledge systems, open infrastructures and engagement with society, which form key elements of open science practices [6].

Citizen science projects and activities have been widely reported [7]. To make citizen science activities and projects thrive and achieve maximum impact, support and collaboration from various stakeholders for long-term sustainability are needed. As [8] suggest, researchers, libraries, and the public should collaborate to ensure adequate retention of citizen science data. This collaboration is essential as an ongoing dialogue among all stakeholders, including academia-industry collaborations [9]. Academic librarians are crucial to support education, research, and engaged scholarship. Aligned with advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations, academic libraries, as key information and knowledge hubs, could provide information, systems, research expertise, and infrastructure to support citizen science activities. Therefore, academic librarians could foster collaboration among stakeholders and promote awareness and advocacy for citizen science activities to fulfil this mission.

Despite the prominent role of academic librarians in research support, the lack of awareness and expertise in citizen science and adequate resourcing of citizen science activities in academic libraries present a significant challenge [10]. When failing to address this, academic libraries risk missing an opportunity to demonstrate their value and relevance to society at large. To ensure advanced support and assistance from academic librarians to expand citizen science opportunities and impact on societies, this paper aims to examine opportunities that will foster collaboration between stakeholders towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals outcomes. The study is guided by the objective ‘to examine ways in which academic librarians can collaborate to advance citizen science activities.’ The research question aims to provide structure in obtaining insight into the research questions:

• What platforms are in place that create awareness and encourage citizen science discourse in academic libraries in South Africa?
• How could South African academic libraries collaborate to support and promote citizen science?

2. Theoretical Background

The study employed the Knowledge Management framework in Figure 1 as a theoretical underpinning, examining collaborative platforms that facilitate awareness creation and stakeholder collaboration. The Knowledge Management framework identifies components such as capture and learn, retain and reuse, enabling technology, and collaboration as important for an effective organisation [11]. The first component of capture and learn highlights that people can acquire and apply knowledge to finish tasks if they participate in learning processes [11]. People can further demonstrate understanding at any point in the learning experience. The component on retention and re-using knowledge assets emphasises the point that citizen science data are knowledge assets which should be retained for future use [11]. Guidelines should therefore be developed to ensure that these knowledge assets are open and accessible in various formats. The third component supports the notion that technology is crucial in citizen science activities as it assists citizen scientists to “connect, collect and collaborate”. The final component highlights the importance of stakeholder collaboration to ensure the sustainability of citizen science activities [11].

Although the framework contains four components, the study applied only the “collaborate” component, which is relevant to the study’s objective of examining ways in which academic librarians can collaborate to advance citizen science activities. The following themes: platforms for creating awareness, collaborating for sustainable service, discussion platforms, key stakeholders and encouraging discussions among stakeholders, which are further discussed in Section 4.3 under data analysis emanated from the component of collaboration. In the framework, the communities of practice are viewed as spaces for stakeholders to collaborate and achieve a common goal. This is in line with the assertion by [8] that the success of citizen science projects relies on stakeholder collaboration.

3. Literature Review

Academic libraries play a crucial role in supporting citizen science by extending their research data services, as [5] suggests. These libraries are the core of the universities they serve and have the potential to become hubs for citizen science initiatives. Their existing collaborations and expertise position them as valuable partners in advancing open science practices. In addition, academic libraries offer a unique avenue for fostering partnerships and engagement, particularly among students, community members and researchers, to support and advance outcomes related to SDGs. Their extensive collections provide a wealth of information that is indispensable for research projects in various fields [12].

Traditionally, libraries have formed consortia to facilitate resource sharing and bulk procurement of information resources [13]. However, recent changes in research have shifted the focus to collaborative efforts in research data management and preservation. For instance, the University College London Library leveraged technology by introducing Radio Frequency Identification Devices (RFIDs) to improve service efficiency. They also established open-access initiatives, creating spaces for students and researchers to engage in research-related discussions [14].

Considering the data-intensive nature of citizen science projects, extensive partnerships are necessary to expand research related to the achievement of SDGs [15]. The data generated from these projects is primary data as it is collected by community members. Community members could therefore contribute to SDGs through their involvement in citizen science projects. In studies conducted on the use of citizen science data to support sustainable development goals in 44 citizen science projects in the sub-Saharan Africa region and, it was established that there is potential to use this data to track the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals, albeit raised concerns of data quality [16].

Collaboration is therefore vital to share best practices and learning from each other. As a key component of the information sharing environment, academic librarians can utilise existing relationships to promote citizen science activities, as exemplified by the collaboration between Purdue University, Aalto University Libraries and Council on Library and Information Resources [17].

The collaboration saw a move towards promoting open geoscience content and how to promote platforms and repositories to citizen science stakeholders in Finnish university libraries. The involvement of academic librarians in such collaborative efforts highlights their significance in supporting inclusive and participatory research. This positions academic librarians as not only hubs of knowledge but also potential hubs of citizen science through fostering access to information and providing research infrastructure. Through platforms like Scistarter and Zooniverse, academic librarians can create spaces to support citizen science projects and activities [18]. For instance, Scistarter hosts more than 3000 registered projects, allowing people to participate actively in science initiatives [2]. Zooniverse is the world’s largest platform where citizens connect with researchers to conduct scientific research [19]. These platforms contain large databases of projects, encourage collaboration and afford community members an opportunity to choose projects to participate in or contribute towards.

In addition to hosting information on registered citizen science projects, academic librarians can create ‘Libraries as Community Hubs for Citizen Science’ initiatives. The partnership between Scistarter, researchers, librarians, citizen scientists, and staff at Arizona State University is an example of such citizen science hubs. The creation of libraries and community hubs to advance citizen science demonstrates the potential of libraries to support citizen science [8]. Outputs from such activities include the publication of librarians’ guides to citizen science aimed at providing insight into incorporating citizen science into library services [20].

Virtual platforms, such as webinars, webcasts, and virtual chat sessions, can also be used to advance citizen science collaborations [20]. Additionally, conference attendance and workshops offered by academic libraries or marketed via academic library social media may emphasise continuous professional development necessary to stay abreast of ways in which to optimally use citizen science to advance open access research.

Open access is a critical part of the open science movement advocated by academic libraries, as it allows researchers to use, re-use and disseminate their research. This fundamental role necessitates a shift in academic libraries to accommodate transformations occurring within research and information technology [21]. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recognises that libraries need to modify their services to support open preservation, dissemination and curation of published digital scientific materials [22].

The open science movement champions open research, enabling collaborative and knowledge-exchange opportunities among diverse stakeholders such as libraries, IT departments, funders, businesses and researchers [23]. One of the critical priorities and emerging success metrics for open science identified by the European Commission is citizen science [4]. The inclusion of citizen science among these priorities indicates the important role played by citizen science in the domain of open science and research.

4. Methodology

4.1. Materials and Methods

The study adopted a quantitative research approach and a case study research design to survey 185 academic librarians who are members of the Library and Information Association of South Africa (LIASA). LIASA is a non-profit organisation established to unite and represent all individuals working in different libraries and information services in South Africa [24]. These members are spread across the 26 public university libraries in South Africa and are affiliated with the Higher Education Library Interest Group (HELIG). The choice to use a quantitative case study design was to gain a generalised understanding of how collaboration between academic librarians and other stakeholders in citizen science could be achieved, and to gather a holistic view of citizen science in the Library and Information Science (LIS) sector.

4.2. Data Collection Method

A web-based survey design was used to collect quantitative data from one hundred and eighty-five (185) respondents who are members of the LIASA-HELIG group affiliated with academic libraries and in various capacities. The census sampling technique was deemed suitable to collect data from the entire population of 185 LIASA–HELIG members. The rationale for using the census sampling was that the topic is new within the academic library context in South Africa, and the research intended to cover many academic librarians. The small number of respondents in the study informed the reason for collecting data from the entire population of LIASA HELIG members. This aligns with the advice to survey the whole population if it is less than 100 or survey 50% if it is around 500 [25]. The population under study is between 100 and 250, which is acceptable according to the previous statement.

The Microsoft Forms software was used to develop the survey questionnaire. An email link containing the questionnaire and a consent form requesting the respondents’ consent and guaranteeing their anonymity should they agree to participate in the study was sent to the respondents. Primary data from 185 invited respondents was collected using a self-administered questionnaire with closed and open questions. The reason for using a flexible questionnaire was to ensure that the respondents had a standardised presentation of the citizen science phenomenon and had the opportunity to express themselves without undue influence.

The questionnaire was administered for three months, with two reminders sent to ensure that many respondents had the opportunity to participate in the study. Despite the reminders sent, the overall response rate was 34% since only 63 respondents completed the questionnaire. Judging by the population size, the responses cannot be generalised as they are not representative. Although the response rate was low, the researcher maintains that the validity and reliability of the results were not compromised. This assertion is supported by [26] who advance the view that in survey research, there are no clear and acceptable guidelines for response rate [27] also reported that online surveys produced a 12% lower response rate than emails and telephone. It is for these reasons that a low response rate should not prevent assumptions from being drawn from the results [28]. This study will therefore draw assumptions from the results.

4.3. Data Analysis

The Knowledge Management framework in Figure 1 was employed to drive the study. The study adopted only one component of “collaborate”, as it addresses the element of collaboration, which is central to the study. All the other components of capture and sensemaking, retain and reuse and connect were not employed in the study as they are not relevant.

Data analysis followed a six-step procedure to prepare, explore, analyse, represent, interpret, and validate the data [29]. The process involved downloading and exporting responses from Microsoft Forms to Microsoft Excel and a statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) for analysis. Five themes presented in Figure 2 were discovered from the analysis procedure. This was done to present descriptive statistics from respondents.

Figure 2 is a diagrammatic presentation of the five themes discovered from the quantitative results.

Figure 2. Diagrammatic presentation of five themes [30].

Figure 2. Diagrammatic presentation of five themes [30].

4.4. Results

The study established that collaboration is vital for the success and survival of citizen science in academic libraries; however, the issue of the lead collaborator from the various stakeholders should be clarified. The results are presented below.

4.4.1. Employment Profiles

Questions that required demographic information were not included, as they do not have any significance to the study. However, the employment profiles of the respondents shown in

Table 1. Employment profile according to section or role.

Sections	Number	%Age
Client Services Section	23	36.51%
Research support services	15	23.81%
Information Communication Technology Services	8	12.75%
Collection development	2	3.17%
Information Resource Distribution	2	3.17%
Audio Archives	1	1.59%
Cataloguing	1	1.59%
Client Services and Information/Training-Middle Management	1	1.59%
Executive Committee	1	1.59%
Information Literacy	1	1.59%
Information Resource Content Management	1	1.59%
Inter-Library Loans	1	1.59%
Library management (retired, now consultant)	1	1.59%
Management	1	1.59%
Public services	1	1.59%
Regional Branch Libraries	1	1.59%
Technical Services	1	1.59%
Temporarily out of work	1	1.59%
Total	63	100.00%

were mandatory, as they provided background information on the different speciality areas, sections, or roles of the respondents. Three sections, Client Services (36.51%), Research (23.81%), and Information Communication Technology (12.75%), were prominent compared to other sections. The employment profiles do not represent respondents’ knowledge about citizen science but present staff concentration in the various sections.

4.4.2. Platforms to Create Awareness of Citizen Science Activities

During data analysis, the theme of platforms to create awareness of citizen science activities appeared as one of the points to consider. Participants were asked, ‘In your view, how could academic librarians create awareness of citizen science activities’? Furthermore, participants were required to choose more than one option. The results are shown in

Table 2. Awareness of citizen science activities.

In Your View, How Could Academic Librarians Create Awareness of Citizen Science Activities? You May Select More Than One Option Below.
Platforms to Create Awareness of CS Activities	Frequency	%
Develop a page on the library website dedicated to citizen science.	44	15.2%
Develop a Libguide	38	13.1%
Participating in online discussion forums	35	12.1%
Develop a repository where data could be deposited.	34	11.8%
Develop a repository to provide access to data.	32	11.1%
Develop posts on social media	28	9.7%
Arrange a face-to-face discussion with faculty staff.	22	7.6%
Develop a dedicated web application (App).	21	7.3%
Create relevant exhibitions	19	6.6%
Subscribe to subject-related databases	15	5.2%
Community Outreach	1	0.3%
Total	289	100.0%

.

In response to the question on how awareness of citizen science activities could be created, academic librarians listed options such as having a page on the library website dedicated to citizen science activities (15.2%), a libguide (13.1%), an online discussion forum (12.1%), repositories to deposit (11.8%) and access data (11.1%) as platforms to prioritise. Some platforms, such as social media posts and face-to-face discussions, were also mentioned, but the results indicate that they are less important than the five stated. The results are not amiss, as academic librarians are information providers and are expected to provide infrastructure to make information easily accessible to library users. In their quest to fulfil their obligation to provide information, they could employ platforms such as those stated in Table 2 (above) to create awareness of citizen science activities.

4.4.3. Collaborating for the Sustainable Service of Citizen Science

In response to a survey question on how academic librarians could collaborate to ensure the sustainability of citizen science activities, 20 responses were collected (

Table 3. Ways of collaborating.

In Your View, How Could South African Academic Librarians Collaborate for the Sustainable Service of Citizen Science?
Ways of Collaboration	Responses
Community engagement activities	5
Community of practice	5
Discussion forums	4
Citizen science group	4
Conferences and funding	2
Total	20

). The suggestions provided insight into the preferred collaboration methods to sustain citizen science initiatives, and the results presented the following responses.

The results show that academic librarians are in favour of community engagement activities between librarians and community members (5). A community of practice and the formation of a citizen science association (5) are also seen as ideal collaborations for the sustainability of citizen science activities. The academic librarians also listed engaging in discussion forums in workshops and training (4) and forming a citizen science group under LIASA and within universities (4) as preferred means of collaboration. Although [31] reported on evidence of successful formations of communities of practice, mainly by international citizen science associations, the results of this study reported a contrary view where LIASA, as a community of practice, was the least preferred discussion forum to sustain citizen science activities (see Section 4.4.4 below). The results further revealed that conferences and funding (2) are not preferred means of collaboration for the sustainable service of citizen science. The result about funding is not surprising, as academic libraries have evolved and have now shifted their services to virtual offerings from bulk buying of physical resources.

4.4.4. Discussion Platforms for the Sustainability of Citizen Science Activities

Discussion forums, particularly online platforms, play a crucial role in the success of citizen science by facilitating communication and knowledge sharing among citizen scientists (OECD, 2015) [22]. The results in Figure 3 featured various platforms that are important to encourage discourse on the sustainability of citizen science initiatives. The respondents mentioned workshops (22%), social media pages (21.7%), face-to-face discussion rooms (20.1%), communities of practice (17.5%) and conferences (16.9%) as valuable platforms for collaboration.

These results suggest that workshops, social media pages, face-to-face discussions, and communities of practice are critical to sustaining citizen science activities in academic libraries. Ref. [32] also emphasised that stakeholders are engaged in the success of citizen science in conferences and workshops. These discussion platforms prevent duplication of efforts and foster efficient collaboration. Ref. [31] reported establishing a community of practice where citizen science practitioners engage in discourse to ensure the sustainability of citizen science projects. Ref. [33] referred to citizen science content as user-generated content suitable for discussion on various platforms, including social media, social networks, blogs, chat rooms, and others.

The following platforms were least preferred by academic librarians as means to sustain citizen science activities: public news publishing (0.5%), LIASA (Library and Information Association of South Africa) (0.5%), and HELIG (Higher Education Libraries Interest Group) (0.5%).

The survey results revealed a contradiction regarding the least preferred discussion forums, namely LIASA (Library and Information Association of South Africa) and HELIG (Higher Education Libraries Interest Group), when discussing citizen science-related content. Ref. [33] recommended using communities of practice as a foundational platform for discussing citizen science-related content. This recommendation aligns with the notion that these platforms function as communities of practice, where librarians from different sectors engage in discussions about library-related information.

However, it is intriguing that these platforms, well-established as communities of practice for librarians, are less favoured for discussions on citizen science activities among academic libraries in South Africa. The other interesting point is that the respondents are also members of LIASA-HELIG; however, they seem not to trust or favour their community of practice as a discussion platform. The reasons for this discrepancy may be multifaceted and warrant further exploration.

Figure 3. Discussion platforms sustaining citizen science activities [34].

Figure 3. Discussion platforms sustaining citizen science activities [34].

4.4.5. Key Stakeholders to Collaborate in Sustaining Citizen Science Activities

The establishment of communities of practice assumes an important function in promoting collaboration [11]. In citizen science projects, considerable amounts of data are generated, often necessitating additional resources, including support from academic libraries. Academic libraries have well-established partnerships with various stakeholders, such as students, academic staff members, and community members, which they can leverage to advance citizen science initiatives [5].

The recommended partners for collaboration in citizen science activities typically include researchers, libraries, and the public engaged in research, aligning with the insights from [8]. Notably, these recommendations reveal the responses of academic librarians, who identified stakeholders they could collaborate with to support citizen science activities. Participants were asked to identify key stakeholders to collaborate with academic librarians. In addition, they were instructed to select more than one option in their responses. The results are presented in Figure 3.

The apparent preference for academic librarians to work with researchers (39), academics (34) and citizen scientists (31) stems from their natural interactions with these groups. Other noteworthy stakeholders are the University Research Office (27), LIASA (23), National Research Foundation (22), Citizen Science Organisations in South Africa (21), and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (19) are mostly external but have a key role to play in the academic library environment. As a result,

Table 4. Key stakeholders to help sustain citizen science activities.

In Your Opinion, Who do You Think Are the Key Stakeholders with Whom Academic Librarians Could Collaborate to Sustain Citizen Science Activities? You May Select More Than One Option Below.
Stakeholders	Responses
Researchers	39
Academics	34
Citizen scientists	31
University Research Office	27
Library and Information Services of South Africa (LIASA).	23
National Research Foundation (NRF)	22
Citizen Science Organisations in South Africa	21
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR).	19

illustrates the importance of focusing on researchers, academics, citizen scientists, and community members as primary collaborators in the sustainability of these activities.

It should be noted that the least preferred stakeholders may be attributed to academic librarians in South Africa, who are still navigating their roles in citizen science and do not fully understand these stakeholders’ potential contributions. To ensure the success of citizen science initiatives, consideration, attention, and efforts should be directed toward fostering collaboration with these key groups.

4.4.6. Encouraging Discussions About Citizen Science Among Stakeholders

Collaboration is a well-established practice for academic libraries, which have long been involved in resource sharing through consortia [35]. According to the knowledge management framework, collaboration consists of two essential components. The first part involves leadership support to encourage collaboration, followed by active participation of practitioners to drive collaborative efforts [11].

Collaboration among various key stakeholders is crucial to enable the flourishing of citizen science within academic libraries. This includes the Information, Communication, and Technology (ICT) Department, the Research Office, citizen scientists, librarians, and researchers. Academic libraries must act as intermediaries, bridging external citizen science programmes and initiatives with researchers and scientists, as [36] suggested. Engaging in discussions and encouraging discourse on citizen science with relevant stakeholders is necessary for academic librarians [37]. The results of this study, as presented in

Table 5. Necessity to encourage discussion about citizen science.

Do You Think Academic Librarians Must Encourage Discussions About Citizen Science Among Stakeholders (Community Members/Citizen Scientists, Researchers, Academic Staff Members)?
	Frequency
Yes	27
No	9

, demonstrate the importance of this involvement. In response to the question, (27) academic librarians agreed that they need to encourage discussions about citizen science, while (9) responded with a “No.”

This result highlights the significance of academic librarians in promoting dialogue on citizen science among key stakeholders within academic libraries, including community members/citizen scientists, researchers, and academic staff members. A follow-up question was posed to respondents who supported the idea of encouraging discussions about citizen science. Several key points were highlighted in

Table 6. Ways to encourage discussions among stakeholders.

If Yes: How Can Academic Librarians Encourage Discussions About Citizen Science Among Stakeholders?	Respondents
By creating awareness and understanding of citizen science	9
Through collaborations between academic universities and communities.	5
Librarians are seen as a platform between stakeholders that brings them together.	1
Through data preservation and accessibility.	1

.

Nine academic librarians pointed out the need to raise awareness and enhance understanding of citizen science to ignite discussions. This includes initiatives to educate stakeholders about the concept and its potential benefits. Five respondents advocated for collaborative efforts to stimulate discussions on citizen science. Collaborations could involve partnerships between different stakeholders within academic libraries and beyond. Two responses deviated from the main themes, where an academic librarian believed librarians serve as a platform between stakeholders, acting as intermediaries. Another response mentioned ‘data preservation and accessibility’, although it was not entirely relevant to the question.

When academic librarians who expressed a lack of interest in encouraging discussions about citizen science were asked to provide reasons for their selection, their responses illuminated barriers and perceptions. As presented in

Table 7. Reasons not to encourage discussions about citizen science.

If Not, Why?	Respondents
Academic librarians have shown little evidence of participating in research.	5
No, academic staff have a KPA for community participation, while library staff don’t.	3
Community members may be better subject experts, as they have lived experience.	1
The subject-specific/discipline scientist is in a better position to promote citizen science.	1

, the results revealed that five respondents indicated that academic librarians have shown little evidence of participating in research activities. This perception suggests that academic librarians’ limited involvement in research may influence their hesitancy to engage in discussions about citizen science.

Three participants highlighted different key performance areas (KPAs) where academic staff members have a specific KPA for community participation, while library staff do not. This might account for academic librarians’ lack of involvement. One respondent acknowledged that community members often have a deeper understanding of specific topics, potentially making them more qualified subject experts in citizen science. Another participant indicated that subject-specific or discipline-specific scientists are better positioned to promote citizen science, suggesting that they are more competent and better suited due to their specialised knowledge.

These results indicate that academic librarians’ lack of involvement in research, differing key performance areas, and perceptions of subject-specific expertise present significant barriers to discussions about citizen science. It is also evident that academic librarians may not view leading and encouraging conversations about citizen science as their primary responsibility. Ref. [38] emphasizes that the role of academic libraries is primarily to support research efforts by providing access to literature and various services and products. Based on this view, it is therefore not surprising that academic librarians see their contribution in research support and not in conducting the actual research.

5. Discussion

Academic librarians participate in community engagement activities and regard collaborations formed through citizen science associations and communities of practice as important to sustain citizen science activities (see Knowledge Management Framework in Figure 1). These findings view academic librarians as actively playing a facilitation role in citizen science activities, which aligns with the prescripts of the Knowledge Management Framework of seeing practitioners as driving the collaboration. At the centre of these collaborations and continuous dialogue with citizen scientists, researchers, and academics is the shared goal of the success of citizen science. Academic librarians play an important role in encouraging discussions on citizen science, creating awareness and educating stakeholders about citizen science. This extends the role of academic librarians from providing access to that of education advocacy for citizen science activities.

During the analysis, creating awareness of citizen science activities emerged as a recurring theme under the collaboration objective. In particular, the importance of initiating awareness of citizen science activities at the university level is underscored [8]. Universities and research institutions are encouraged to play a central role in providing resources and promoting the infrastructure necessary to support citizen science initiatives. Academic libraries, which are integral components of these institutions, are expected to align their mandates with those of their institutions. According to [39], academic librarians must have the essential skills and knowledge and the ability to develop awareness services and establish partnerships to create new services.

However, an intriguing contradiction surfaces when examining this focus on creating awareness within the context of citizen science. At the heart of citizen science lies the principle of community outreach, wherein community members actively contribute their time and expertise to citizen science projects [9]. In essence, citizen science embodies a form of community outreach, and its success hinges on the active participation of the community. This contradiction highlights the need to balance creating awareness and fostering active community engagement, as these aspects are essential in citizen science. In the pursuit of encouraging awareness, it is crucial not to undermine the core principles of citizen science, which revolve around the invaluable contributions of community members.

6. Conclusions

Citizen science is inherently collaborative, involving multiple stakeholders, such as the community, researchers, and other interested parties, depending on the specific project. International citizen science associations have shown that collaboration is fundamental to establishing a foundation for successful citizen science activities. The study’s results also underscore the need for collaboration among citizen science stakeholders. However, there are differing views on who should take the lead in spearheading these collaborative efforts. The study recommends that academic librarians play a central role in initiating and coordinating collaboration among the stakeholders mentioned, including academic librarians, academic staff members, and community members. This recommendation is grounded in the fact that the proposal to position citizen science in academic libraries falls within the purview of academic librarians. Given their involvement in research and data-intensive environments and their existing connections with academic staff members, it is natural for academic librarians to serve as coordinators of citizen science activities.

The study also highlights the importance of using collaboration platforms, virtual or physical, to promote awareness and advocacy of citizen science. To facilitate this, the recommendation is to form a community of practice that includes academic librarians, community members, academic staff, and researchers. This community of practice will serve as a hub for collaborative efforts in citizen science. Furthermore, academic librarians should establish their community of practice to connect with local and international colleagues who have embarked on similar initiatives. This networking will enable benchmarking and the sharing of lessons learnt from peers. In addition to forming partnerships and collaborations, academic librarians should actively engage with local citizen science associations. Staying informed about new citizen science projects and actively participating in these initiatives is essential. This proactive approach will help academic librarians play a pivotal role in the advancement of citizen science within their institutions and the broader community.