Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Enriching Human–AI Collaboration: The Ontological Service Framework Leveraging Large Language Models for Value Creation in Conversational AI
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation

by
Joseph Jebari
1,2 and
Ariel M. Greenberg
3,*
1
Georgetown-Howard Center for Medical Humanities and Health Justice, Washington, DC 20001, USA
2
Department of Philosophy, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA
3
Research & Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Knowledge 2026, 6(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge6010003
Submission received: 1 October 2025 / Revised: 22 December 2025 / Accepted: 25 December 2025 / Published: 4 January 2026

Abstract

The deployment of autonomous systems in human environments demands sophisticated mechanisms for recognizing and preventing harm. This paper proposes an innovative discovery method for identifying harm-relevant features through the systematic analysis of thick harm verbs—semantically and pragmatically rich linguistic concepts like “puncture”, “crush”, or “poison” that encode both the mechanics and normative evaluations of specific harm types. By analyzing thick harm verbs to extract the information they encode, we can systematically identify the objects, properties, mechanisms, and contextual conditions that autonomous systems need to track to recognize and prevent harm. We demonstrate how this discovery method can be implemented with the support of large language models as analytical assistance tools, showing how human analysts can operationalize the framework with current technology. The resulting feature specifications discovered through this method provide foundations for constructing harm ontologies that bridge abstract ethical principles and concrete system requirements, addressing a critical gap in autonomous systems design while maintaining explanatory transparency essential for safe deployment in human environments.
Keywords: harm ontology; autonomous systems ethics; machine ethics; harm recognition; thick concepts; LLM-assisted analysis harm ontology; autonomous systems ethics; machine ethics; harm recognition; thick concepts; LLM-assisted analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jebari, J.; Greenberg, A.M. Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation. Knowledge 2026, 6, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge6010003

AMA Style

Jebari J, Greenberg AM. Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation. Knowledge. 2026; 6(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge6010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jebari, Joseph, and Ariel M. Greenberg. 2026. "Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation" Knowledge 6, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge6010003

APA Style

Jebari, J., & Greenberg, A. M. (2026). Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation. Knowledge, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge6010003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop