Next Article in Journal
Risk Factors and Individual Protection Measures for COVID-19 in Federal Police Officers
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Sample of Houston-Based Middle Eastern and North African Residents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gingipain Genotyping as a Potential Predictor for the Assessment of Periodontal Health and Disease Condition

1
Central Research Laboratory, Maratha Mandal’s Nathajirao G. Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Belagavi 590010, India
2
Department of Biotechnology, KLE Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubballi 5800031, India
3
Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA
4
Department of Pharmaceutics, Chebrolu Hanumaiah Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guntur 522019, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hygiene 2022, 2(4), 178-186; https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene2040016
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 18 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 October 2022 / Published: 12 October 2022

Abstract

:
Oral hygiene maintenance is important to maintain optimal oral health. Oral health is affected by dysbiotic oral microflora in the dental plaque. Virulent factors of pathogenic organisms, such as gingipain, are responsible for tissue degradation and host tissue invasion in periodontal disease. We sought to investigate the distribution of gingipain genotypes (rgpA and kgp) of P. gingivalis in patients with chronic periodontitis and healthy individuals. The study included individuals positive for P. gingivalis, with 95 samples in the chronic periodontitis (CP) group and 35 samples in the healthy (H) group. We found that kgp-I and kgp-II types were prevalent in 67.36% and 32.64% of the samples in the CP group, respectively. In the H group, kgp-II was highly prevalent (97.14%). The rgpA genotype, type A was found in 78.95% and 82.85% of the samples in the CP and H group, respectively. The mean level of PD and CAL were increased in the presence of kgp-I and decreased in the presence of kgp-II. The mean level of P. gingivalis was increased in the presence of kgp-I and rgpA, type A. Our results show that kgp-I and kgp-II are strongly associated with disease and health condition, respectively.

1. Introduction

Periodontitis is a polymicrobial infectious disease characterized by inflammation within supporting tissues of teeth, loss of clinical attachment and alveolar bone [1]. Putative pathogens in the oral biofilm interact with host tissues and contribute to an exaggerated inflammatory response, leading to periodontitis [2]. Porphyromonas gingivalis defined as a ‘keystone pathogen’ for its ability to disrupt the host protective mechanism is considered a putative causative agent responsible for the pathogenesis and development of chronic periodontitis [3]. The pathogenic capability of P. gingivalis is reflected in its diverse virulent factors, such as fimbriae, cysteine proteases (gingipains), capsules, haemagglutinins, lipopolysaccharides, exopolysaccharides, outer membrane proteins, outer membrane vesicles and lipoteichoic acids. These virulent factors aid the organism in colonization and to evade antibacterial host defense mechanisms, and damage host periodontal structure [4,5]. Gingipains are one of the important pathogenic agents of P. gingivalis and are being studied extensively for their key role in contributing to pathogenesis.
Gingipains are trypsin-like cysteine proteinases belonging to the peptidase family C25 which are broadly categorized as arginine-dependent gingipain R (protein Rgp) and lysine-dependent gingipain K (protein Kgp), based on their ability to incise polypeptides after arginine and lysine residues, respectively [6]. The gene coding for gingipain R containing hemagglutinin/adhesion (HA) domain is called rgpA/prpR1, whereas the gene that encodes gingipain R without an HA domain is referred to as rgpB. Allaker et al. identified three genotypes of rgpA/prpR1 gingipain (type A, B, and C) [7]. kgp is referred to as the gene encoding gingipain. K. Beikler et al. reported two diverse types of kgp (kgp-I and kgp-II) according to the sequence dissimilarity in the region that encodes the catalytic domain [8].
Gingipains are involved in haem acquisition which is required for bacterial growth. P. gingivalis acquires haem mainly from haemoglobin. The HA region serves a vital role in the haemoglobin-binding strength of RgpA and Kgp [9], while RgpB lacking in the HA region has minimal binding activity [10]. Gingipains, are similar to extracellular matrix proteins, plasma proteins, cytokines, and host cell surface proteins in their ability to cleave and degrade host proteins [11]. Gingipains contribute to bleeding owing to the role of Kgp in the efficient digestion of fibrinogen and fibrin, which are responsible for blood coagulation [12]. It has also been shown that Rgp upregulates MMP-1 expression from gingival fibroblasts and directly activates MMPs, which contributes to destruction of the matrix tissue [13].
It has been observed that virulence can differ at both the level of the genotype and in the phenotypic expression of the gene [14,15]. The difference in pathogenic ability among the strains of P. gingivalis observed are attributed to the presence of specific virulence genes. The disparity in the virulent activity results in a differential level of severity in oral health and disease. Thus, across the globe, study of virulence factors has become an important issue for understanding disease etiology.
The distribution and role of gingipain genotypes is well established and studied in diseased conditions; however, only a few reports on the distribution of genotypes in periodontal health exist. Hence, we sought to investigate the occurrence of gingipain genotypes of P. gingivalis in patients with chronic periodontitis and healthy individuals and to assess their association with clinical characteristics in these subjects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

The study included 95 samples from the chronic periodontitis (CP) group and 35 samples from the healthy (H) group, all of which were positive for P. gingivalis in our earlier reported analysis of 120 samples from each group [16]. All the participants included in the study were screened to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria as reported in our earlier paper. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing index (PI) and bleeding index (BI) were recorded for each participant. Subgingival plaque samples were collected using a universal curette from all the teeth except the third molars. DNA extraction and quantification of P. gingivalis by real-time PCR was performed as described in [16].

2.2. Amplification of kgp and rgpA Gene

The amplification of kgp and rgpA genes was performed as described by Beikler et al. and Allaker et al., respectively [7,8]. The primer pairs with their amplified length were as described in Table 1. A reaction mixture was prepared in 0.2 mL PCR tubes with a total volume of 25 µL for each sample. To the PCR tube, 12.5 µL of Ampliqon red, 2X master mix (Ampliqon, Odense, Denmark) was added containing Tris-HCL pH 8.5, (NH4)2SO4, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2% Tween 20, 0.4 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 units/µL Ampliqon Taq DNA polymerase, and inert red dye and stabilizer. Then 2µL of each of the primers specific to kgp and rgpA were added to the separate reactions from a working concentration of 20 pmole/µL. The DNA template was added at approximately 100 ng concentration.
For amplification of the kgp gene, the thermal cycling conditions were as follows: The initial denaturation was performed at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 62 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. Final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 5 min. For amplification of the rgpA gene, the thermal cycling conditions used were the same as used for the kgp gene except that the extension step was carried out at 72 °C for 3 min.
PCR product length of 890 base pairs specific for the kgp gene and 1700 base pairs specific for the rgpA gene were identified by subjecting PCR amplified samples to 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by staining with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL). The remaining aliquot of PCR product was further used for kgp and rgpA genotyping by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

2.3. Restriction Digestion for kgp and rgpA Genotyping

The kgp gene product was digested with the restriction enzyme Fastdigest MseI (Tru1I) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The reaction mixture was allowed to incubate at 65 °C for 5 min. The rgpA gene product was digested with the enzyme Fastdigest RsaI (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. The digested products were further separated on 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and the bands were visualized on a UV gel documentation system (Major Science, Saratoga, NY, USA).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 5.1 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The frequency of the kgp and rgpA genotypes, and their statistical association with chronic periodontitis, was evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. The relationship of the genotypes with clinical parameters and the quantity of P. gingivalis was examined using an unpaired t-test and the Mann Whitney U test, respectively. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

In the present study, we processed 95 samples from the CP group and 35 samples from the H group, which were found to be positive for P. gingivalis by real-time PCR in our earlier study [16]. The kgp genotyping in the CP group showed that kgp type I was more prevalent (67.36%), followed by kgp-II (32.64%), whereas in the H group, kgp-II was more prevalent (97.14%) than kgp-I (2.8%). Hence, kgp-I was significantly associated with the CP group (p value < 0.0001), whereas there was a significant association of kgp-II with the H group (p value < 0.0001). In the rgpA genotyping in the CP group, type A was more prevalent (78.95%), followed by type B and type C (16.84% and 4.2%, respectively). In the H group similar results were obtained with type A and type B being present in 82.85% and 17.14% of the samples, respectively. Type C was not found in any of the samples. There was no statistical association found for rgpA genotypes with the CP or H group (Table 2) (Figure 1).
The presence of different genotypes of kgp and rgpA were correlated with clinical parameters. The mean level of PD in the presence of kgp-I was 5.88 ± 0.74 compared to its absence (5.45 ± 0.38). The mean level of CAL was 5.64 ± 1.27 in the presence of kgp-I when compared to the absence of this genotype (4.71 ± 1.20). There was a statistical association between the presence of kgp-I with PD and CAL with a p value < 0.0001 for both. The mean level of PD in the presence of kgp-II was 5.35 ± 0.52 when compared to the absence of kgp-II (5.8 ± 0.56). Similarly, the mean CAL level was 4.74 ± 1.49 in the presence of kgp-II when compared to its absence (5.37 ± 1.16). There was a significant difference for the absence of kgp-II with PD and CAL (p value < 0.0001 and 0.004, respectively). For the presence of rgpA, type A there was a higher mean level of CAL (5.35 ± 1.21) and PI (2.54 ± 0.21) when compared to its absence. There was a noteworthy association between the presence of rgpA type A with CAL and PI. In the presence of rgpA type C, we found the mean level of PI was 2.30 ± 0.40 when compared to the absence of rgpA type C (2.52 ± 0.18). The difference was statistically significant (p value 0.02) (Table 3).
When the quantitative data of P. gingivalis were correlated with the presence or absence of specific genotypes of kgp and rgpA, we found that the mean level of P. gingivalis in the presence of kgp-I was 2.11 × 108 (median 3.85 × 106) compared to 7.51 × 107 (median 1.89 × 104) in the absence of this genotype. Hence the quantity of P. gingivalis was significantly associated with the presence of kgp type I (p value < 0.0001). The mean level of P. gingivalis in the presence of rgpA type A was 1.57 × 108(median 4.07 × 106) compared to 1.32 × 108(median 0.0) in the absence of type A. The difference was statistically significant with a p value < 0.0001 (Table 4).
The quantitative relationshipsfor the level of P. gingivalis with the gingipain genotypes is depicted in Figure 2. A detection frequency of >107 cells of P. gingivalis was higher in the presence of kgp-I (35.94%) when compared to the presence of kgp-II (25.81%). The detection frequency of ≤104 cells of P. gingivalis was higher in the presence of kgp-II (25.81%) when compared with any other genotype.

4. Discussion

Gingipain-containing P. gingivalis have been linked to systemic chronic inflammatory diseases and have been associated with periodontal disease development [17]. Thus, virulent factors are important determinants of the pathogenic ability of P. gingivalis. To investigate the pathogenic variability of P. gingivalis, it is necessary to study the association between these virulence factors and diseased and healthy conditions. Fimbriae genotyping has been performed extensively across different categories of population and the association of specific fimA virulent types with disease and health is well-documented [18,19,20].
We found that the most prevalent kgp type in the CP group was type I (67.5%), whereas, in the H group, kgp-II was the most frequently found gingipain (97.14%). The genotype kgp-II was significantly associated with health condition. Among rgpA genotypes, type A was most frequently found in both the groups (78.95% and 82.85%, respectively). Beikler et al. also reported a comparable frequency of lysine-specific protease (kgp) genotypes in a German population [8]. They found that kgp-I was colonized in 57.1% of the P. gingivalis positive patients and kgp-II in 42.2% of the positive patients. Allaker and his co-workers found rgpA type A was the most prevalent (77%) arginine-specific gingipain in chronic periodontitis patients, followed by type B and type C.They also found both type A and B at two different sites from a single individual [7]. Our findings did not indicate the presence of any such combinations. Another study by Yoshino et al. found that kgp type I and type II occurred at a similar frequency (56.5% and 43.5%, respectively) in isolates of chronic periodontitis patients. Among rgpA genotypes, type A was found in 75.8% of the 62 isolates, followed by type B and type C, which were detected in 21% and 3% of the clinical isolates [21]. A study by Abusleme L found that kgp-I was prevalent in 65.2% of the samples and kgp-II in 34.8% of the samples. All the 38 isolates had rgpA type A (100%), with no detection of type B and type C [22]. All these studies were performed on either chronic periodontitis patients or in aggressive periodontitis cases. Due to the dominant occurrence of rgpA, type A in both the groups, this study could not establish an association of any specific arginine-specific gingipain with diseased or health condition. Significant results were obtained regarding lysine-specific gingipain, with kgp-I and kgp-II being frequently associated with diseased and health condition, respectively.
The relationship of gingipain genotypes with clinical parameters showed that the presence of kgp-I was frequently associated with deep pocket depth and more clinical attachment loss compared to other types. Furthermore, kgp-II was more frequently detected in shallow pocket depths and, comparatively, there was less clinical attachment loss when compared to other types. In contrast to our results, Beikler et al. did not find any association of gingipains with clinical characteristics, such as probing depth and bleeding on probing [8]. Nevertheless, we agree that the higher prevalence of kgp-I observed in the CP group suggests its better adaptability to environmental changes and, hence, its capacity to enable P. gingivalis colonization of the oral cavity.
Oral biofilm formation is the initial step in the progression of chronic periodontitis disease. Streptococci species, the known early colonizers in plaque formation, are major pathogens that colonize the adherent rich plaque. The ability of P. gingivalis to adhere to Streptococcus gordonii under the stress of low shear forces, and to form biofilm structures typical of biofilm deposits, has been investigated in an invitro model by Cook GS et al. [23]. They found that P. gingivalis exhibited preferential adherence to a streptococcal surface compared to a saliva-coated glass surface. In another study, it was found that Streptococci played a vital role in facilitating the establishment of P. gingivalis by depletion of environmental oxidants [24]. In our study, the rgpA, type A genotype was found to be significantly associated with increased plaque index (PI) and increased clinical attachment loss (CAL). This correlation was strengthened by the increased colonization of P. gingivalis in the CP group in the presence of the same genotype. This leads us to believe that there could be vital interactions between rgpA, type A with early colonizers, which can benefit P. gingivalis in the colonization process. The relationship of this genotype with different early colonizers needs to be further explored.
Tomoko Kadowaki used electron microscopy to examine the fimbriation process of P. gingivalis using KGP- and RGP-deficient mutant strains [25]. They found that an RGP-null mutant strain showed little or no fimbriation whereas a KGP-deficient mutant possessed characteristic fimbriae on the cell surface. This suggests that RGP, and not KGP, is responsible for the fimbriation of P. gingivalis. Our results, which showed a significant relationship of rgpA, type A with increased colonization of P. gingivalis, further establish the role of this gingipain genotype in bacterial adhesion through the processing of fimbrilin. It is possible that colonization of certain pathogenic genotypes could lead to progression of the co-colonization of other putative pathogens and disease progression. The exact mode of interaction among these players needs to be further investigated.
The clinical characteristics correspond to our quantitative data in which the mean number of cells of P. gingivalis was increased with the presence of kgp-I and rgpA type A (p value < 0.0001 for both). There was also evidence of kgp-II being associated with health condition, as the highest percentage (25.8%) of samples showed <104 cells of P. gingivalis when this genotype (kgp-II) occurred in the patient compared to other genotypes. Although there is sequence variation in the two kgp types, the differential activity of these two kgp types—one playing a role in periodontitis, the other in healthmay be explained by the differing adherence capacity of each genotype mediated by different kgp products exhibiting differential substrate specificity.
Gingipains have been implicated in other diseases, which highlights the urgent need for further research in this area. A recent study suggested that P. gingivalis that express Kgp and Rgp, attaches to the tracheal and bronchial pulmonary tissue and induces mucin production leading to aggravation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [26]. Gingipain virulent factors have been known to manipulate the immune system, causing immuno suppression that triggers neurodegenerative processes related to Alzheimer’s disease [27]. Gingipain inhibition may provide multiple benefits for periodontal disease treatment and prevention. In one of our previous studies, we found that resveratrol was able to inhibit gingipain gene expression, thereby limiting the formation of mature P. gingivalis biofilm in an invitro study [28]. Other studies have shown that antibodies targeted against the amino terminal region of the catalytic domain of gingipain R influence the immunogenic response against P. gingivalis, suggesting the potential availability of vaccination for human use [29]. Studies have found that tetracycline and its analogues improve clinical characteristics in patients with chronic periodontitis by inhibiting gingipain activities [30]. The results obtained from our study suggest that gingipain genotyping can be utilized as an important determinant of periodontal health and disease condition and further establishes its role in the pathophysiology of periodontitis, indicating its utility as a target in periodontal therapy.
One of the limitations of this study is that we employed a pooled sample technique; therefore, the co-existence of different genotypes in the same ecological niche could not be assessed. The individual site needs to be evaluated to relate colonization to a specific ecological niche by a certain genotype.

5. Conclusions

A unique finding of this study is the positive association of periodontal health with the kgp-II genotype. The significant association of the kgp-I genotype with chronic periodontitis confirms findings from previously reported studies. We also found no polymorphism existed for the rgpA gene, but that rgpA, type A played an important role in bacterial colonization. However, the exact mode of rgpA, type A interaction with other colonizing bacterial needs to be investigated. In future, larger randomized control trials are needed to confirm the findings of this study. This will help in the quest to find possible markers for periodontal health and disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K., K.B. and U.M.; methodology, M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K. and V.J.; writing—review and editing, M.R.P. and V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Maratha Mandal’s NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi (Certificate no. 2016/819).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Basavaraj Hungund, Department of Biotechnology, KLE Technological University for supporting this study. We would also like to thank Ramakant Nayak, Principal, Maratha Mandal’s NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi for allowing us to conduct this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lindhe, J.; Ranney, R.; Lamster, I.; Charles, A.; Chung, C.P.; Flemmig, T.; Kinane, D.; Listgarten, M.; Loe, H.; Schoor, R.; et al. Consensus Report: Chronic Periodontitis. Ann. Periodontol. 1999, 4, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bullon, P.; Newman, H.N.; Battino, M. Obesity, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis and chronic periodontitis: A shared pathology via oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Periodontol. 2000 2014, 64, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hajishengallis, G.; Darveau, R.P.; Curtis, M.A. The keystone-pathogen hypothesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hajishengallis, G.; Lamont, R.J. Breaking bad: Manipulation of the host response by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 44, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Holt, S.C.; Kesavalu, L.; Walker, S.; Genco, C.A. Virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Periodontol. 2000 1999, 20, 168–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eichinger, A.; Beisel, H.G.; Jacob, U.; Huber, R.; Medrano, F.J.; Banbula, A.; Potempa, J.; Travis, J.; Bode, W. Crystal structure of gingipain R: An Arg-specific bacterial cysteine proteinase with a caspase-like fold. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 5453–5462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Allaker, R.P.; Aduse-Opoku, J.; Batten, J.E.; Curtis, M.A. Natural variation within the principal arginine-specific protease gene, prpR1, of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 1997, 12, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beikler, T.; Peters, U.; Ehmke, B.; Flemmig, T.F. Sequence analysis of kgp in Porphyromonas gingivalis isolates from periodontitis patients. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 18, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Veith, P.D.; Talbo, G.H.; Slakeski, N.; Dashper, S.G.; Moore, C.; Paolini, R.A.; Reynolds, E.C. Major outer membrane proteins and proteolytic processing of RgpA and Kgp of Porphyromonas gingivalis W50. Biochem. J. 2002, 363, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Olczak, T.; Dixon, D.W.; Genco, C.A. Binding specificity of the Porphyromonas gingivalis heme and hemoglobin receptor HmuR, gingipain K, and gingipain R1 for heme, porphyrins, and metalloporphyrins. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 5599–5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Potempa, J.; Sroka, A.; Imamura, T.; Travis, J. Gingipains, the major cysteine proteinases and virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis: Structure, function and assembly of multidomain protein complexes. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2003, 4, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guo, Y.; Nguyen, K.A.; Potempa, J. Dichotomy of gingipains action as virulence factors: From cleaving substrates with the precision of a surgeon’s knife to a meat chopper-like brutal degradation of proteins. Periodontol. 2000 2010, 54, 15–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. DeCarlo, A.A., Jr.; Windsor, L.J.; Bodden, M.K.; Harber, G.J.; Birkedal-Hansen, B.; Birkedal-Hansen, H. Activation and novel processing of matrix metalloproteinases by a thiol-proteinase from the oral anaerobe Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Dent. Res. 1997, 76, 1260–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Amano, A.; Nakagawa, I.; Okahashi, N.; Hamada, N. Variations of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae in relation to microbial pathogenesis. J. Periodontal Res. 2004, 39, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kato, T.; Kawai, S.; Nakano, K.; Inaba, H.; Kuboniwa, M.; Nakagawa, I.; Tsuda, K.; Omori, H.; Ooshima, T.; Yoshimori, T.; et al. Virulence of Porphyromonas gingivalis is altered by substitution of fimbria gene with different genotype. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kugaji, M.S.; Muddapur, U.M.; Bhat, K.G.; Joshi, V.M.; Kumbar, V.M.; Peram, M.R. Quantitative evaluation of Porphyromonas gingivalis in Indian subjects with chronic periodontitis by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. J. Adv. Oral Res. 2019, 10, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Castro, S.A.; Collighan, R.; Lambert, P.A.; Dias, I.H.; Chauhan, P.; Bland, C.E. Porphyromonas gingivalis gingipains cause defective macrophage migration towards apoptotic cells and inhibit phagocytosis of primary apoptotic neutrophils. Cell Death. Dis. 2017, 8, e2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kugaji, M.; Muddapur, U.; Bhat, K.; Joshi, V.; Manubolu, M.; Pathakoti, K.; Peram, M.R.; Kumbar, V. Variation in the Occurrence of fimA Genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis in Periodontal Health and Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhao, L.; Wu, Y.F.; Meng, S.; Yang, H.; OuYang, Y.L.; Zhou, X.D. Prevalence of fimA genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis and periodontal health status in Chinese adults. J. Periodontal Res. 2007, 42, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Puig-Silla, M.; Dasí-Fernández, F.; Montiel-Company, J.M.; Almerich-Silla, J.M. Prevalence of fimA genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis and other periodontal bacteria in a Spanish population with chronic periodontitis. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2012, 17, e1047–e1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yoshino, T.; Laine, M.L.; Van Winkelhoff, A.J.; Dahlen, G. Genotype variation and capsular serotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis from chronic periodontitis and periodontal abscesses. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 270, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Abusleme, L.; Blanc, V.; Léon, R.; Gamonal, J.; Silva, N. Genotyping of rgpA and kgp genes coding for Porphyromonas gingivalis gingipains. Rev. Clin. Periodoncia Implantol. Rehabil. Oral 2012, 5, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cook, G.S.; Costerton, J.W.; Lamont, R.J. Biofilm formation by Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus gordonii. J. Periodontal Res. 1998, 33, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ammann, T.W.; Belibasakis, G.N.; Thurnheer, T. Impact of early colonizers on in vitro subgingival biofilm formation. PLoS ONE 2013, 5, e83090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kadowaki, T.; Nakayama, K.; Yoshimura, F.; Okamoto, K.; Abe, N.; Yamamoto, K. Arg-gingipain acts as a major processing enzyme for various cell surface proteins in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 29072–29076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Miya, C.; Cueno, M.E.; Suzuki, R.; Maruoka, S.; Gon, Y.; Kaneko, T.; Yonehara, Y.; Imai, K. Porphyromonas gingivalis gingipains potentially affect MUC5AC gene expression and protein levels in respiratory epithelial cells. FEBS Open Bio 2021, 11, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Putri, C.F.; Bachtiar, E.W. Infection of Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s Disease and the Suppression of Immunity. Dent. Hypotheses 2021, 12, 174–178. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kugaji, M.S.; Kumbar, V.M.; Peram, M.R.; Patil, S.; Bhat, K.G.; Diwan, P.V. Effect of Resveratrol on biofilm formation and virulence factor gene expression of Porphyromonas gingivalis in periodontal disease. APMIS 2019, 127, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Imamura, T. The role of gingipains in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. J. Periodontol. 2003, 74, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ciancio, S.G. Clinical experiences with tetracyclines in the treatment of periodontal diseases. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1994, 732, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Barchart depicting distribution of gingipain genotypes in chronic periodontitis and healthy groups. * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Barchart depicting distribution of gingipain genotypes in chronic periodontitis and healthy groups. * p < 0.05.
Hygiene 02 00016 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between P. gingivalis level and prevalence of kgp and rgpA genotypes in chronic periodontitis patients.
Figure 2. Relationship between P. gingivalis level and prevalence of kgp and rgpA genotypes in chronic periodontitis patients.
Hygiene 02 00016 g002
Table 1. PCR primers used for gingipain genotyping (kgp and rgpA) by PCR.
Table 1. PCR primers used for gingipain genotyping (kgp and rgpA) by PCR.
GingipainsPrimer Sequences (5′-3′)Product Length
in Base Pair
Reference
kgp forwardGAACTGACGAACATCATTG890[8]
kgp reverseGCTGGCATTAGCAACAC
rgpA forwardAGTGAGCGAAACTTCGGA1700[7]
rgpA reverseGGTATCACTGGGTATAACCTGT
Table 2. Frequency distribution of gingipain genotypes in chronic periodontitis and healthy groups.
Table 2. Frequency distribution of gingipain genotypes in chronic periodontitis and healthy groups.
Gingipain GenotypesChronic
Periodontitis
HealthyOdd
Ratio
95% Confidence Intervalp Value
N%N%
kgp-I6467.3612.865.6519.33 to 222.9<0.0001 *
kgp-II3132.643497.140.0150.004 to 0.05<0.0001 *
rgpA, type A7578.952982.850.770.37 to 1.560.8055
rgpA, type B1616.84617.1410.47 to 2.091
* p < 0.05.
Table 3. Association of genotypes of gingipain with clinical parameters in chronic periodontitis patients.
Table 3. Association of genotypes of gingipain with clinical parameters in chronic periodontitis patients.
Gingipain GenotypesPresent/
Absent
PDCALPIGI
Mean ± SDp ValueMean ± SDp ValueMean ± SDp ValueMean ± SDp Value
kgp-IPresent5.88 ± 0.74<0.0001 *5.64 ± 1.27<0.0001 *2.51 ± 0.230.8652.55 ± 0.290.437
Absent5.45 ± 0.384.71 ± 1.202.51 ± 0.282.51 ± 0.35
kgp-IIPresent5.35 ± 0.52<0.0001 *4.74 ± 1.490.004 *2.53 ± 0.380.52672.50 ± 0.520.3906
Absent5.8 ± 0.565.37 ± 1.162.50 ± 0.202.54 ± 0.24
rgpA, APresent5.70 ± 0.640.64955.35 ± 1.210.04 *2.54 ± 0.210.02 *2.56 ± 0.260.1133
Absent5.65 ± 0.674.96 ± 1.582.46 ± 0.302.48 ± 0.40
rgpA, BPresent5.85 ± 1.630.16215.48 ± 2.600.27672.47 ± 0.550.38162.45 ± 0.800.1526
Absent5.66 ± 0.485.16 ± 1.052.52 ± 0.192.54 ± 0.23
rgpA, CPresent5.40 ± 1.410.26734.67 ± 4.800.31142.30 ± 0.400.02 *2.35 ± 1.440.1361
Absent5.69 ± 0.485.22 ± 0.992.52 ± 0.182.54 ± 0.22
PD: probing depth, CAL: clinical attachment loss, PI: plaque index, GI: gingival index, SD: standard deviation, unpaired t-test. * p < 0.05.
Table 4. Association of genotypes of gingipain with the quantity of P. gingivalis in chronic periodontitis patients.
Table 4. Association of genotypes of gingipain with the quantity of P. gingivalis in chronic periodontitis patients.
Gingipain GenotypesPresence/
Absence
Mean±SEMMedianInterquartile Range (IQR)p Value
kgp-IPresence2.11 × 1081.02 × 1083.85 × 1062.26 × 107<0.0001 *
Absence7.51 × 1077.19 × 1071.89 × 1045.24 × 106
Kgp-IIPresence1.36 × 1081.30 × 1084.53 × 1061.01 × 1070.1378
Absence1.51 × 1087.41 × 1071.17 × 1061.09 × 107
rgpA, type APresence1.57 × 1087.21 × 1074.07 × 1066.81 × 107<0.0001 *
Absence1.32 × 1081.23 × 1080.00001.23 × 108
rgpA, type BPresence3.68 × 1083.44 × 1084.13 × 1063.40 × 1080.0715
Absence1.13 × 1085.24 × 1071.35 × 1065.10 × 107
rgpA, type CPresence9.39 × 1062.79 × 1061.19 × 1079.06 × 1060.1378
Absence1.52 × 1086.63 × 1071.59 × 1066.47 × 107
SEM: standard error of mean. Mann Whitney U test, * p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kugaji, M.; Bhat, K.; Muddapur, U.; Joshi, V.; Peram, M.R.; Kumbar, V. Gingipain Genotyping as a Potential Predictor for the Assessment of Periodontal Health and Disease Condition. Hygiene 2022, 2, 178-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene2040016

AMA Style

Kugaji M, Bhat K, Muddapur U, Joshi V, Peram MR, Kumbar V. Gingipain Genotyping as a Potential Predictor for the Assessment of Periodontal Health and Disease Condition. Hygiene. 2022; 2(4):178-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene2040016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kugaji, Manohar, Kishore Bhat, Uday Muddapur, Vinayak Joshi, Malleswara Rao Peram, and Vijay Kumbar. 2022. "Gingipain Genotyping as a Potential Predictor for the Assessment of Periodontal Health and Disease Condition" Hygiene 2, no. 4: 178-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene2040016

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop