Next Article in Journal
Health and Benefits of Dog Companionship in Women over 50 Years Old
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Relationship between Emotional Valence and Prospective Memory Metamemory in Younger and Older Adults
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of the Influence of Clinical History on the Occurrence of Dementia Using the Database of National Health Insurance in Japan

1
Department of Health and Welfare Services, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama 351-0197, Japan
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
3
The University of Fukuchiyama, 3370, Aza Hori, Fukuchiyama-shi, Kyoto 620-0886, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Ageing Longev. 2023, 3(4), 523-531; https://doi.org/10.3390/jal3040025
Submission received: 16 October 2023 / Revised: 27 November 2023 / Accepted: 4 December 2023 / Published: 6 December 2023

Abstract

:
The global incidence of dementia has been rising for the past several years, posing significant health challenges regarding its management and prevention. Dementia is associated with a substantial burden on patients and their families. Therefore, effective, evidence-based preventive strategies are required for dementia. To achieve this, the predisposing factors for dementia and their relationship with other diseases need to be determined. Japan has a universal health insurance system and these data have been stored in their respective databases since 2008. Herein we explored the influence of clinical history on the occurrence of dementia based on data collected by the National Health Insurance in Japan and Municipal Care Certification Survey over the past 10 years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors from clinical history that affect the risk of dementia development. A significant odds ratio was observed for the development of dementia in 5-year data, involving the clinical history of osteoporosis, depression, internal carotid artery occlusion, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease. In addition, a significant odds ratio was observed for the development of dementia in 10-year data, involving the clinical history of osteoporosis, cataracts, and schizophrenia.

1. Introduction

The global incidence of dementia has been rising for the past several years, posing significant health challenges regarding its management and prevention [1]. The World Health Organization estimates that in 2012, 36 million individuals had dementia [2]. The G8 dementia summit stated that the global prevalence of dementia will double in the next two decades between 2030 (66 million) and 2050 (131 million), primarily because of the increasing age of the population [3]. The risk of dementia occurrence rises with age and is the highest among individuals aged >70 years. Dementia is associated with a substantial burden on patients and their families. Therefore, effective, evidence-based preventive strategies are required for dementia. To achieve this, the predisposing factors for dementia and its relationship with other diseases need to be determined.
Preventive strategies for diseases are categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary. Primary and secondary prevention strategies are essential to reduce the dementia prevalence. These strategies can be developed on the basis of longitudinal cohort studies that evaluate the risk factors of dementia related to lifestyle and health conditions [4].
A previous study demonstrated that nine factors account for 35% of the dementia risk: education up to the age of <11 years, midlife hypertension, midlife obesity, hearing loss, late-life depression, diabetes, physical inactivity, smoking, and social isolation [5]. Among older individuals, those who exercise regularly are at a higher odds of having normal cognition than those who do not exercise. Few randomized trials have evaluated the effects of exercise on cognitive decline or dementia [6]. However, observational studies have shown that increased exercise is associated with a reduced risk of dementia [7,8,9,10,11]. Observational studies have also demonstrated that physical inactivity is associated with higher risks of diabetes and major cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, patients with the aforementioned health conditions have a higher risk of developing dementia [12,13,14]. It is unclear whether exercise reduces the risk of developing dementia directly or indirectly by preventing the risk factors of dementia [6].
Previous cohort studies with prolonged follow-up durations demonstrated that a number of depressive episodes were associated with the dementia risk, confirming that depression predisposes an individual to dementia [15]. The underlying mechanisms for this association involve depression-mediated changes in the stress hormones, nerve growth factors, and hippocampal volume, as evidenced by biological studies [16].
Social isolation has comparable effects to physical inactivity. Similarly to depression, social isolation may be a component or prodrome of dementia. Increasing evidence suggests that social isolation predisposes individuals to dementia, hypertension [17], coronary heart disease, [18] depression [19], and consequently cognitive inactivity, leading to rapid cognitive decline and low mood [20]. As a result, to determine the risk of dementia, the physical as well as mental health of individuals should be evaluated.
In 1961, Japan introduced a universal health insurance system. In Japan, there is “social insurance” for office workers and civil servants and national health insurance for self-employed people and freelancers (including “medical care system for the elderly” for elderly people). Deidentified data from the Specified Health Checkups and other medical records were transmitted to and stored at the National Health Insurance databases [21]. Furthermore, Japanese individuals with long-term care needs are provided care services at home and in institutions [22] by municipalities [23]. The Municipal Needs Certification Committee is responsible for evaluating the requests for long-term nursing care by residents based on more than 70 functions, such as activities of daily living, cognitive function, physical function, living function, adaptation to society, and behavioral disorder [4,24]. The Municipal Care Certification Survey collects data related to the cognitive ability and dementia. Data from such these surveys are freely available for use for studies on healthcare cost optimization and the quality improvement of healthcare services.
Herein, we explored the relationship between the clinical history and occurrence of dementia based on data collected by the National Health Insurance and Municipal Care Certification Survey over the past 10 years. Although many studies have investigated the relationship between the onset of dementia and one other specific disease, there are few studies that have investigated the relationship between the onset of dementia and multiple other diseases using multivariate analysis. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between dementia onset and clinical history over the past 10 years to facilitate the development of primary prevention strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

At present, it is not possible to completely match National Health Insurance data and long-term care certification data across the country. Therefore, this study focused on one city (Mishima City), where National Health Insurance data and long-term care certification had already been completely matched. This study targeted 34,756 residents aged 18 years and older in Mishima City, Japan, who were enrolled in the National Health Insurance System (including medical insurance for the elderly). To examine the long-term and short-term effects of medical history, we examined the 5-year and 10-year effects. In total, 24,371 individuals (10,289 men and 14,082 women; mean age: 73.91 ± 13.79 years; 18–107 years) received medical treatment at a medical institution using the National Health Insurance both in 2022 as well as 5 years ago, in 2017 (Analysis 1). Furthermore, we selected 20,488 individuals (8408 men and 12,080 women; mean age: 75.19 ± 13.83 years; 18–107 years) who underwent medical treatment using the National Health Insurance in 2022 as well as 10 years ago, in 2012 (Analysis 2). Individuals diagnosed with dementia (Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, and vascular dementia) in 2017 or 2012 were excluded from this study.

2.2. Classification of Cognitive Ability

Dementia was defined as “residents receiving treatment for dementia (Alzheimer disease, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, vascular dementia) in 2022” or “residents with a level of cognitive decline level 4 or higher on 7-point scale in 2022 Municipal Care Certification Survey.” In the Municipal Care Certification Survey, physicians assessed the core and peripheral symptoms of dementia. For instance, short-term memory was evaluated by pointing out three familiar objects to the patients. After removing the objects from the patients’ vision, the physician asks the patients to recall the three objects. Furthermore, the long-term care specialist records the patient’s cognitive function (9 items), mental/behavioral disorders (15 items), and adaptation to social life (6 items) to classify the cognitive level of patients (I: can live independently; II: monitoring needed only outside the home; Ⅲ: monitoring needed inside and outside the home; Ⅳ: need support during the day; Ⅴ: need support during the night; Ⅵ: need support during day and night; and Ⅶ: need support in a nursing home).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors from the clinical history that affect the risk of dementia development. The results of the logistic regression analysis are reported as the adjusted odds ratio (OR), and the potential effects of confounders were excluded. The residents were classified into two groups, Group A (residents at levels I–Ⅲ or not receiving medical treatment) and Group B (residents at levels Ⅳ–Ⅶ or receiving medical treatment), using their cognitive level and whether they were treated for dementia in 2022. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with (A/B) as the objective variable and clinical history in the past 5 or 10 years as the explanatory variables. The clinical history was recorded in 2017 or 2012 and covered the top 35 most frequently reported diseases in the National Health Insurance. In addition to these diseases, age and sex were entered into the multivariate logistic regression analysis as independent variables. SPSS (version 27) and Modeler (version 18.3) (IBM Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were used to conduct data analyses.
The research protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH-IBRA #12386) and the municipal assembly of Mishima. The study was performed in accordance with the International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology [25], Guidelines for the Utilization of the Database for National Health Insurance Claim, Specific Medical Checkup/Health Guidance [26], and Guidelines of Security for Health Information Systems [27]. The local administration deidentified the data before analysis.

3. Results

The significant crude ORs in 2017 were determined based on the results of the univariate logistic analysis, with significant results for all items except for six (Table 1).
All items were entered into the multivariate logistic regression analysis, regardless of their results in the univariate analysis, to exclude potential confounders and determine the risk factors of dementia incidence. Significant ORs were found for dementia occurrence in six items, including “Age”, “Osteoporosis”, “Depression”, “Internal carotid artery thrombosis”, “Schizophrenia”, and “Parkinson’s disease” (Table 1).
Next, a similar analysis was conducted for the clinical history since 2012. In the univariate analysis, significant crude ORs were found for all diseases except for eleven (Table 2).
Next, all items were entered into the multivariate logistic regression analysis to exclude potential confounders and determine the risk factors of dementia occurrence. The ORs of developing dementia were significant with four items, including “Age”, “Osteoporosis”, “Cataract”, and “Schizophrenia” (Table 2).

4. Discussion

In 2019, the estimated worldwide cost of dementia was USD 1313.4 billion for the 55.2 million individuals with dementia, which translated into USD 23,796 per person with dementia. Among these costs, USD 213.2 billion (16%) were direct medical costs, USD 448.7 billion (34%) were direct social sector costs (including long-term care), and USD 651.4 billion (50%) were the costs of informal care [28]. The Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan estimates that 4.62 million individuals had dementia in 2013, which is predicted to rise to 6.75 million in 2025 and 8.2 million in 2030 [29]. Data collected by long-term care services and National Health Insurance in Japan are accumulated, analyzed, and stored in databases at the national level, which enables the identification of predisposing factors for dementia to facilitate the development of preventive strategies. We have reported on the relationship between past health checkup results and the onset of dementia using these databases, but in this study, we focused our analysis on the relationship with past clinical history [4]. In this study, only the most common diseases were used as explanatory variables; however, even if the number is small, there may be other diseases that may influence the onset of dementia or serve as confounding factors.
In this study, multivariate adjusted OR demonstrated that a clinical history of osteoporosis 5 and 10 years ago was related to an increased incidence of dementia (OR: 1.211, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.024–1.431 in 2012). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that individuals with osteoporosis have higher risks of cognitive impairment, and its treatment can prevent or delay the onset of cognitive impairment in high-risk patients [30]. Certain studies have identified an independent association between bone mineral density and cognition, with higher values of the former correlating with lower cognitive dysfunction [31]. Furthermore, the bone formation marker osteocalcin indicates the degree of bone transformation in osteoporosis and the degree of cognitive impairment. Indeed, the loss of osteocalcin predisposes individuals to the dysfunction of spatial learning and memory dysfunction [32]. In addition, since osteoporosis leads to movement disorders, lack of exercise may indirectly increase the risk of dementia [5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
The multivariate analysis demonstrated that a history of cataract within the past 10 years ago was associated with a higher OR of developing dementia (OR: 1.220, 95% CI: 1.045–1.424 in 2012). A recent systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated an association between cataracts and higher risks of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and mild cognitive impairment in older adults [33]. Cataracts are characterized by lens opacities that compromise visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual function, and quality of life, thereby predisposing individuals to the development of cognitive impairment. There are numerous explanations for these findings, such as reduced sensory stimulation, social isolation, depression, physical inactivity, and vascular risk factors. In particular, vision impairment inhibits social participation and contributes to the patient’s social engagement [34]. Visual impairment contributes to social isolation and may indirectly contribute to dementia [5].
Our multivariate analysis showed that a clinical history of internal carotid artery occlusion 5 years ago was associated with an increased risk of dementia. Previous systematic reviews have reported that individuals with the complete occlusion of the internal carotid artery are at risk of cerebral hypoperfusion, which in turn can lead to accelerated cognitive decline [35].
Furthermore, our findings of multivariate adjusted ORs showed that a clinical history of schizophrenia 5 and 10 years ago was related to an increased incidence of dementia. Recent studies have demonstrated rapid cognitive decline and brain changes in middle-aged and older individuals with schizophrenia compared to healthy individuals [36]. Dementia is hypothesized to have a complex relationship with schizophrenia. Calcium signaling dysregulation, e.g., increased intracellular calcium level, and the cAMP signaling pathways can cause both diseases [37].
A significant OR was obtained for a 5-year history of depression, whereas the OR was not significant for a 10-year history of depression. A cohort study followed individuals for almost 28 years prior to dementia onset and showed an increased prevalence of depressive symptoms among individuals who developed dementia than the healthy population within the 10 years before dementia onset [38]. Additionally, a cohort of adults aged ≥ 65 years were followed for 14 years to determine the prodromal manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease, and depressive symptoms were found 8 years before the diagnosis [39]. These results are consistent with those of our study.
Our study also yielded a significant multivariate adjusted OR for a 5-year history of Parkinson’s disease. A significant number of individuals with Parkinson’s disease develop dementia, with a prevalence of nearly 30% [40]. It is unclear whether Parkinson’s disease, Parkinson’s disease dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies are separate disease entities or part of the same family of diseases [41]. Further detailed studies on the association between Parkinson’s disease and dementia are required.
Hearing loss is linked to cognitive decline, dementia [5], and the atrophy of the frontotemporal brain regions due to the blockage of afferent pathways and dysregulated cognitive control networks due to the increased listening effort. It also leads to social disengagement, loneliness, and depression, which are independent risk factors of cognitive decline [5,42]. Recent research suggests that the use of hearing aids may slow dementia progression [42]. In our study, a history of hearing loss did not yield significant multivariate adjusted ORs. However, our study only considered a clinical history and did not consider variables related to hearing aid use or treatment, which may have affected our results. A more detailed analysis is needed that takes into account variables related to treatment methods.
As a limitation of the research, this study focuses on one city rather than the data for the whole of Japan. At present, national health insurance data and long-term care certification data cannot be completely matched across the country. Additionally, in this study, only the most common diseases were used as explanatory variables, but it is possible that there are diseases that are small in number and may influence the onset of dementia or serve as confounding factors. Furthermore, as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the onset of dementia is currently unknown, this study was unable to consider the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dementia. Future long-term, large-scale prospective studies that include a therapeutic approach are needed to identify historical factors associated with an increased risk of dementia.

5. Conclusions

Our analysis of the 5-year data from the National Health Insurance database showed that clinical history of osteoporosis, depression, internal carotid artery occlusion, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease were associated with the dementia risk. In addition, a 10-year history of osteoporosis, cataracts, and schizophrenia was associated with the dementia risk. Future long-term, large-scale prospective studies that include a therapeutic approach are needed to identify historical factors associated with an increased risk of dementia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.T. and Y.H.; methodology, Y.T. and T.K.; investigation, Y.T.; formal analysis, Y.T.; writing original draft preparation, Y.H., Y.T. and T.K.; writing, review, and editing, Y.T., Y.H. and T.K.; supervision, T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI (JP21K02001, JP23K09730).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (NIPH-IBRA #12386) of the National Institute of Public Health in Japan and the Mishima City Council.

Informed Consent Statement

The data used in this study were anonymized and deidentified by the city. In Japan, data such as receipt data can be used without residents’ consent only for academic research of public interest other than the original purpose (24 December 2010 Minister of Health, Labor and Welfare Notification No. 424).

Data Availability Statement

To protect the anonymity of participants, data will not be shared unless they apply to the municipality for administrative procedures.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors have reported no conflict of interest related to this study.

References

  1. Alladi, S.; Hachinski, V. World dementia: One approach does not fit all. Neurology 2018, 91, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organization; Alzheimer’s Disease International. Dementia: A Public Health Priority; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/dementia-a-public-health-priority (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  3. Princem, M.; Wimo, A.; Guerchet, M.; Ali, G.C.; Wu, Y.T.; Prina, M. World Alzheimer Report 2015—The Global Impact of Dementia: An Analysis of Prevalence, Incidence, Cost and Trends; Alzheimer’s Disease International: London, UK, 2015; Available online: https://www.alzint.org/u/WorldAlzheimerReport2015.pdf (accessed on 27 August 2023).
  4. Tamaki, Y.; Hiratsuka, Y.; Kumakawa, T. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Dementia Incidence Based on Previous Questionnaire Results of Specific Health Checkups in Japan. Healthcare 2020, 8, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Livingston, G.; Sommerlad, A.; Orgeta, V.; Costafreda, S.G.; Huntley, J.; Ames, D.; Ballard, C.; Banerjee, S.; Burns, A.; Cohen-Mansfield, J. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet 2020, 396, 413–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kivimäki, M.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Pentti, J.; Sabia, S.; Nyberg, S.T.; Alfredsson, L.; Goldberg, M.; Knutsson, A.; Koskenvuo, M.; Koskinen, A.; et al. Physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, and risk of dementia: An individual-participant meta-analysis. BMJ 2019, 365, l1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sofi, F.; Valecchi, D.; Bacci, D.; Abbate, R.; Gensini, G.F.; Casini, A.; Macchi, C. Physical activity and risk of cognitive decline: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. J. Intern. Med. 2011, 269, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hamer, M.; Chida, Y. Physical activity and risk of neurodegenerative disease: A systematic review of prospective evidence. Psychol. Med. 2009, 39, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. de Labra, C.; Guimaraes-Pinheiro, C.; Maseda, A.; Lorenzo, T.; Millán-Calenti, J.C. Effects of physical exercise interventions in frail older adults: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Geriatr. 2015, 15, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Blake, H.; Mo, P.; Malik, S.; Thomas, S. How effective are physical activity interventions for alleviating depressive symptoms in older people? A systematic review. Clin. Rehabil. 2009, 23, 873–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Almeida, O.P.; Khan, K.M.; Hankey, G.J.; Yeap, B.B.; Golledge, J.; Flicker, L. 150 minutes of vigorous physical activity per week predicts survival and successful ageing: A population-based 11-year longitudinal study of 12,201 older Australian men. Br. J. Sports Med. 2014, 48, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chatterjee, S.; Peters, S.A.E.; Woodward, M.; Arango, S.M.; Batty, G.D.; Beckett, N.; Beiser, A.; Borenstein, A.R.; Crane, P.K.; Haan, M.N.; et al. Type 2 diabetes as a risk factor for dementia in women compared with men: A pooled analysis of 2.3 million people comprising more than 100,000 cases of dementia. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wolters, F.J.; Segufa, R.A.; Darweesh, S.K.L.; Bos, D.; Ikram, M.A.; Sabayan, B.; Hofman, A.; Sedaghat, S. Coronary heart disease, heart failure, and the risk of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018, 14, 1493–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kuźma, E.; Lourida, I.; Moore, S.F.; Levine, D.A.; Ukoumunne, O.C.; Llewellyn, D.J. Stroke and dementia risk: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018, 14, 1416–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dotson, V.M.; Beydoun, M.A.; Zonderman, A.B. Recurrent depressive symptoms and the incidence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2010, 75, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Szymkowicz, S.M.; Gerlach, A.R.; Homiack, D.; Taylor, W.D. Biological factors influencing depression in later life: Role of aging processes and treatment implications. Transl. Psychiatry 2023, 10, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, Y.C.; Boen, C.; Gerken, K.; Li, T.; Schorpp, K.; Harris, K.M. Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hemingway, H.; Marmot, M. Evidence based cardiology: Psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ 1999, 318, 1460–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Santini, Z.I.; Koyanagi, A.; Tyrovolas, S.; Mason, C.; Haro, J.M. The association between social relationships and depression: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 175, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kuiper, J.S.; Zuidersma, M.; Oude Voshaar, R.C.; Zuidema, S.U.; van den Heuvel, E.R.; Stolk, R.P.; Smidt, N. Social relationships and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Res. Rev. 2015, 22, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. NDB Open Data (Japan). Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000177182.html (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  22. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Long-Term Care, Health and Welfare Services for the Elderly. Available online: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/ (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  23. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Long-Term Care Insurance Business Situation. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/kaigo/toukei/joukyou.html (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  24. Tamaki, Y.; Hiratsuka, Y.; Kumakawa, T.; Miura, H. Relationship between the Necessary Support Level for Oral Hygiene and Performance of Physical, Daily Activity, and Cognitive Functions. Int. J. Dent. 2018, 2018, 1542713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Research. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Available online: http://www.lifescience.mext.go.jp/files/pdf/n796_01.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  26. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Guideline for Provision of Database for National Health Insurance Claim and the Specific Medical Checkup and Specific Health Guidance. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12400000/000923325.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  27. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Security Guidelines for Health Information Systems. Available online: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/05-Shingikai-12601000-Seisakutoukatsukan-Sanjikanshitsu_Shakaihoshoutantou/0000166260.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  28. Wimo, A.; Seeher, K.; Cataldi, R.; Cyhlarova, E.; Dielemann, J.L.; Frisell, O.; Guerchet, M.; Jönsson, L.; Malaha, A.K.; Nichols, E.; et al. The worldwide costs of dementia in 2019. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023, 19, 2865–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ninomiya, T. General Search Report to the Future Estimation of the Elderly Population of the Dementia of a Japanese. Available online: https://mhlw-grants.niph.go.jp/project/23685 (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  30. Zhao, Y.; Chen, H.; Qiu, F.; He, J.; Chen, J. Cognitive impairment and risks of osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2023, 106, 104879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhou, R.; Deng, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, H.D.; Wang, Y.J. Association between bone mineral density and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2011, 24, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Obri, A.; Khrimian, L.; Karsenty, G.; Oury, F. Osteocalcin in the brain: From embryonic development to age-related decline in cognition. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xiong, Z.; Li, X.; Yang, D.; Xiong, C.; Xu, Q.; Zhou, Q. The association between cataract and incidence of cognitive impairment inolder adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav. Brain Res. 2023, 50, 114455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Coyle, C.E.; Steinman, B.A.; Chen, J. Visual Acuity and Self-Reported Vision Status. J. Aging Health 2017, 29, 128–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oudeman, E.A.; Kappelle, L.J.; Van den Berg-Vos, R.M.; Weinstein, H.C.; van den Berg, E.; Klijn, C.J.M. Cognitive functioning in patients with carotid artery occlusion: A systematic review. J. Neurol. Sci. 2018, 394, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Adamowicz, D.H.; Lee, E.E. Dementia among older people with schizophrenia: An update on recent studies. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2023, 36, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bergantin, L.B. The Complex Link Between Schizophrenia and Dementia: Targeting Ca2+/cAMP Signalling. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 3326–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh-Manoux, A.; Dugravot, A.; Fournier, A.; Abell, J.; Ebmeier, K.; Kivimäki, M.; Sabia, S. Trajectories of Depressive Symptoms Before Diagnosis of Dementia: A 28-Year Follow-Up Study. JAMA Psychiatry 2017, 74, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Amieva, H.; Le Goff, M.; Millet, X.; Orgogozo, J.M.; Pérès, K.; Barberger-Gateau, P.; Jacqmin-Gadda, H.; Dartigues, J.F. Prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: Successive emergence of the clinical symptoms. Ann. Neurol. 2008, 64, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hanagasi, H.A.; Tufekcioglu, Z.; Emre, M. Dementia in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 374, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Walker, L.; Stefanis, L.; Attems, J. Clinical and neuropathological differences between Parkinson’s disease, Parkinson’s disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies—Current issues and future directions. J. Neurochem. 2019, 150, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kirubalingam, K.; Nguyen, P.; Newsted, D.; Gill, S.S.; De La Lis, A.; Beyea, J.A. Hearing Loss and Dementia: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2023, 52, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of clinical history in 2017.
Table 1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of clinical history in 2017.
History of Past IllnessesCrude Odds
Ratio
95% CIp-ValueMultivariate Adjusted Odds Ratio95% CIp-Value
Lower LimitUpper Limit Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Age1.1481.1401.157<0.0011.1431.1321.154<0.001
Sex1.3981.2531.560<0.0010.9950.8521.1610.948
Hypertension2.1301.8612.437<0.0010.9800.8411.1420.797
Hyperlipidemia1.2470.9961.5600.0540.9540.8271.1000.516
Diabetes1.5491.3641.758<0.0011.0180.8831.1730.809
Low back pain1.5691.3611.809<0.0010.9290.7961.0840.351
Hypercholesterolemia1.2251.0611.4130.0060.8900.7611.0410.145
Osteoporosis2.2801.9882.615<0.0011.1981.0161.4130.032
Angina pectoris1.9391.6612.263<0.0011.0300.8661.2250.737
Knee osteoarthritis1.8051.5642.084<0.0010.8900.7571.0460.156
Cataract1.4481.2321.701<0.0010.9190.7751.0900.333
Hearing loss1.0020.7231.3890.9900.7400.5271.0400.083
Cerebral infarction2.0571.7472.423<0.0011.1260.9441.3450.188
Hyperuricemia1.4601.2061.768<0.0011.1690.9411.4510.158
Arteriosclerosis0.9390.5261.6780.8320.7810.4281.4240.420
Lumbar spinal stenosis1.8221.5322.168<0.0010.9910.8141.2080.933
Acute heart failure2.2781.9172.707<0.0011.2130.9971.4760.054
Peripheral neuropathy1.5321.2631.859<0.0010.9440.7631.1670.593
Hepatic dysfunction1.4711.2421.741<0.0011.0480.8701.2630.621
Depression1.8301.4212.357<0.0011.6341.2392.154<0.001
Arrhythmia1.6481.3062.081<0.0011.0490.8161.3480.709
Internal carotid artery
occlusion
2.5761.7693.750<0.0011.5441.0332.3080.034
Glaucoma1.5531.2831.881<0.0011.0280.8391.2600.787
Stomach cancer1.0510.8201.3470.6950.9330.7171.2140.605
Chronic renal failure1.9051.2902.8140.0011.1720.7621.8030.471
Colon cancer1.1980.9601.4950.1110.9940.7841.2600.960
Lung cancer1.5621.1192.1830.0091.0520.7391.4990.778
Schizophrenia1.4951.0462.1370.0273.1902.1294.781<0.001
Cerebral thrombosis2.3181.2084.4490.0121.3690.6792.7560.380
Stroke sequelae1.8751.5322.294<0.0011.0910.8721.3650.444
Chronic heart failure2.2091.6832.900<0.0011.2880.9571.7350.095
Decreased renal function1.4021.0921.8000.0081.0560.8031.3890.694
Rheumatoid arthritis1.2010.8841.6310.2411.0310.7471.4230.851
Psychosomatic disorder1.2740.8261.9650.2740.9760.6221.5330.917
Parkinson’s disease4.0312.5566.358<0.0012.5511.5654.157<0.001
Atrial fibrillation1.8641.3962.490<0.0010.9870.7201.3530.936
Arteriosclerosis obliterans1.4721.2001.806<0.0010.9440.7571.1770.607
_cons 0.000
“Cerebral infarction” in this study does not include “cerebral hemorrhage”.
Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of clinical history in 2012.
Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of clinical history in 2012.
History of Past IllnessesCrude Odds
Ratio
95% CIp-ValueMultivariate
Adjusted Odds Ratio
95% CIp-Value
Lower LimitUpper Limit Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Age1.3981.2531.560<0.0011.1401.1291.151<0.001
Sex1.1481.1401.157<0.0010.9590.8251.1140.582
Hypertension2.2001.9352.502<0.0011.1260.9731.3020.112
Hyperlipidemia1.4361.2671.627<0.0010.9900.8621.1380.891
Diabetes1.4881.3141.685<0.0011.0730.9321.2350.330
Low back pain1.4441.2461.674<0.0010.8680.7401.0180.081
Hypercholesterolemia1.2561.0881.4500.0020.8810.7531.0300.112
Osteoporosis2.4292.1152.790<0.0011.2111.0241.4310.025
Angina pectoris1.9181.6382.246<0.0011.0620.8901.2670.504
Knee osteoarthritis2.1151.8392.433<0.0011.0230.8741.1980.774
Cataract2.1721.8822.506<0.0011.2201.0461.4240.012
Hearing loss1.3210.9871.7660.0610.8700.6401.1820.372
Cerebral infarction2.0291.7402.367<0.0011.1450.9691.3530.111
Hyperuricemia1.2090.9701.5080.0910.9650.7571.2290.771
Arteriosclerosis1.2730.7382.1950.3860.8300.4701.4670.521
Lumbar spinal stenosis2.0681.7312.471<0.0011.0050.8211.2310.959
Acute heart failure1.8111.4782.219<0.0010.9540.7581.2000.688
Peripheral neuropathy1.7981.4942.163<0.0011.1240.9151.3800.265
Hepatic dysfunction1.0160.8361.2350.8710.8390.6801.0360.102
Depression1.3531.0291.7800.0301.1000.8161.4840.532
Arrhythmia1.3981.0861.8000.0090.9160.6971.2040.530
Internal carotid artery occlusion2.3781.6383.453<0.0011.3240.8901.9700.166
Glaucoma1.5891.2891.958<0.0010.9420.7541.1770.597
Stomach cancer1.3921.1021.7570.0051.1610.9061.4870.238
Chronic renal failure1.3670.7582.4660.2981.1040.5872.0780.759
Colon cancer1.2811.0151.6170.0370.9100.7111.1640.452
Lung cancer1.8061.2812.5450.0011.2350.8591.7740.255
Schizophrenia1.1760.7751.7840.4474.3562.7256.962<0.001
Cerebral thrombosis1.5280.8232.8340.1791.0500.5492.0060.883
Stroke sequelae1.6081.2951.998<0.0010.9070.7171.1470.414
Chronic heart failure1.8751.2042.9200.0051.0370.6431.6710.883
Decreased renal function1.0440.7571.4390.7930.7780.5531.0960.151
Rheumatoid arthritis1.2970.9621.7500.0881.0970.7991.5060.567
Psychosomatic disorder0.8000.4671.3710.4170.5950.3411.0390.068
Parkinson’s disease2.4851.2364.9960.0111.4780.7033.1070.303
Atrial fibrillation1.7241.2582.3620.0011.1060.7881.5520.560
Arteriosclerosis obliterans2.1901.8062.655<0.0011.2310.9921.5280.059
_cons 0.000
“Cerebral infarction” in this study does not include “cerebral hemorrhage”.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tamaki, Y.; Hiratsuka, Y.; Kumakawa, T. Evaluation of the Influence of Clinical History on the Occurrence of Dementia Using the Database of National Health Insurance in Japan. J. Ageing Longev. 2023, 3, 523-531. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal3040025

AMA Style

Tamaki Y, Hiratsuka Y, Kumakawa T. Evaluation of the Influence of Clinical History on the Occurrence of Dementia Using the Database of National Health Insurance in Japan. Journal of Ageing and Longevity. 2023; 3(4):523-531. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal3040025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tamaki, Yoh, Yoshimune Hiratsuka, and Toshiro Kumakawa. 2023. "Evaluation of the Influence of Clinical History on the Occurrence of Dementia Using the Database of National Health Insurance in Japan" Journal of Ageing and Longevity 3, no. 4: 523-531. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal3040025

APA Style

Tamaki, Y., Hiratsuka, Y., & Kumakawa, T. (2023). Evaluation of the Influence of Clinical History on the Occurrence of Dementia Using the Database of National Health Insurance in Japan. Journal of Ageing and Longevity, 3(4), 523-531. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal3040025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop