Next Article in Journal
Behaviorally Stretched Microeconomics
Previous Article in Journal
Navigating the Flipped Learning Approach: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications in Teacher Education
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Entry

Cuteness and Its Emotional Responses

by
Shiri Lieber-Milo
The Department of East Asian Studies, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
Encyclopedia 2025, 5(3), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030146
Submission received: 9 July 2025 / Revised: 24 August 2025 / Accepted: 10 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Social Sciences)

Definition

Cuteness is commonly associated with visual features such as large eyes, a disproportionately large head, round body shapes, and small size. While these traits are most often observed in infants and young animals, they also appear in inanimate objects and digital representations intentionally designed to evoke emotional appeal. Drawing on developmental psychology, behavioral science, neuroscience, and cultural studies, this paper examines five core emotional responses to cute stimuli: caretaking, socializing, whimsical, cute aggression, and kama muta (the feeling of being emotionally moved). These responses emerge from an interplay between evolutionary mechanisms, such as caregiving instincts, and cultural frameworks that shape how cuteness is perceived, expressed, and valued. The analysis highlights not only biological foundations but also cultural moderators, with particular attention to gender differences and the pervasive role of kawaii aesthetics in Japan’s popular culture, communication, and everyday life. This paper provides an overview of these emotional responses, situates them within their theoretical foundations and broader psychological and social implications, and proposes a framework for future research.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Have you ever found yourself walking down the street, catching sight of a baby, a puppy, or a small animal, and instinctively exclaiming, “Aww, what a cutie!”? This spontaneous reaction, often accompanied by a positive emotional surge and a desire to touch, cuddle, or protect the creature, is remarkably common. Young beings, perceived as vulnerable and dependent, tend to elicit strong nurturing and protective impulses in observers.
But why do we react this way to infants and animals? And do all cute stimuli evoke the same “aww” response? Not necessarily, which raises a further question: why not? Although English lacks a precise term for this complex emotional and physiological reaction, Buckley [1] coined the phrase the aww effect to describe its intuitive and often involuntary nature.
This entry explores the psychological foundations of cuteness, a phenomenon that is both biologically rooted and culturally nuanced. While “cute” often refers to cross-cultural physical traits that instinctively trigger caregiving responses, it also carries deeper emotional and symbolic meanings. Before turning to its emotional dimensions, it is necessary to consider the biological foundations of cuteness, which lie in evolutionary mechanisms that promote caregiving and protection.

2. Psychological Foundations and Emotional Responses to Cuteness

To understand the “aww effect” and the role of cuteness in shaping human behavior, it is essential to revisit the foundational work of Konrad Lorenz, a pioneering figure in ethology. Lorenz’s Kindchenschema (baby schema) theory [2] posits that certain physical features, such as large, round eyes, disproportionately large heads, plump cheeks, and small chins, instinctively elicit nurturing and caretaking responses in humans. According to Lorenz [2], beings with these features are perceived as cute and are more likely to be approached, protected, and cared for. Notably, although Lorenz’s baby schema theory became foundational in ethology, his identification of cute features was based on personal intuition rather than empirical investigation [3].
Since the 1960s, empirical research has supported and extended Lorenz’s theory [3]. For example, Glocker, et al. [4] digitally manipulated photographs of infant faces to vary in baby schema characteristics. Some images emphasized traits such as rounder faces and higher foreheads, while others reduced these features. Participants were then asked to rate the cuteness of each image and their motivation to care for the infant depicted. Infants with more pronounced baby schema features were consistently rated as cuter and elicited stronger caregiving motivation. These findings support Lorenz’s theory [2], demonstrating that the degree to which a face displays baby schema traits significantly influences emotional responses and the desire to provide care. Subsequent studies have replicated and expanded on these findings [5,6,7,8].
Neuroscientific studies further reveal what happens in the brain when individuals encounter cute stimuli. Viewing cute beings or objects activates neural regions involved in emotion and reward processing [9]. Within this network, the hippocampus, insula, and parts of the parietal and frontal cortices are primarily involved in emotional processing [10], while neuroimaging studies show that the orbitofrontal cortex and striatum play central roles in reward processing [9]. The visual and sensorimotor regions support perception and action readiness, highlighting the integration of cuteness perception with both emotional and motivational systems. While baby schema theory provides an evolutionary explanation for attraction to specific physical traits, it is only the starting point for understanding the psychology of cuteness. Beyond instinctive caregiving, the perception of cuteness evokes a wide spectrum of emotional responses that shape behavior, interpersonal relationships, and cultural practices. These dimensions will be explored in the following sections.
Although Lorenz [2] emphasized caretaking as the primary emotional response to cuteness, subsequent research has shown that cute stimuli elicit a broader spectrum of affiliative emotions. These include increased social engagement, playful or whimsical behavior, feelings of warmth, a paradoxical form of aggression (e.g., wanting to “squeeze” something cute), and even deeply moving emotional states such as kama muta, a Sanskrit term denoting a sense of being emotionally moved [3,11,12,13,14]. This section reviews the primary emotional responses associated with cuteness and examines their behavioral implications.

2.1. Caretaking

The caretaking response elicited by cuteness extends beyond parental instincts; it appears to be a cross-cultural human tendency. For example, Nittono et al. [15] conducted an online survey examining the connotative meanings of “cute” and attitudes toward cuteness in three countries: Japan (n = 1000), the United States (n = 718), and Israel (n = 437). The study found striking similarities across countries in respondents’ conceptions of cuteness and in their reported tendencies. In all three contexts, cuteness was highly appreciated and was believed to induce positive affective responses. This provides evidence that the concept of cuteness and the feelings connected to its perception may be universal.
Among the emotions associated with cute stimuli, the impulse to nurture and protect often emerges as a salient response. For example, Doebel et al. [16] found that participants reported a dominant urge to care for and protect cute beings, especially children, even when facial features were partially obscured. In other words, the caretaking impulse can still be triggered even when a cute face is masked, underscoring the robustness of this response. Importantly, the caretaking instinct transcends aesthetic appreciation and engages an ethical dimension. At its core, it reflects a moral sensibility, a perceived duty to protect and support the vulnerable. This moral imperative can influence a wide range of behaviors, from simple acts of kindness to charitable giving and humanitarian aid. For instance, Sherman et al. [17] found that participants who viewed cute images showed increased behavioral carefulness, while Zhang and Zhou [18] reported that exposure to cute images increased the likelihood of making charitable donations.
While the drive to nurture appears to be a cross-cultural human experience, cultural norms and individual experiences shape how it is expressed. Cultural frameworks influence how people interpret and respond to cuteness, leading to variations in emotional and behavioral expression [15]. For example, in Japan, particular cultural emphasis is placed on kawaii (the Japanese term for “cute”), which is not only embraced aesthetically but also deeply integrated into everyday life, social relationships, and public communication. These differences underscore the complex interplay between biological instinct and sociocultural context in shaping the experience of cuteness [3].
Beyond external expressions, caretaking as a response to cuteness also offers a sense of emotional reward. When we encounter vulnerable beings such as infants or young animals, we are often compelled to help them out of empathy and a sense of responsibility. In these moments, the experience of cuteness not only triggers protective instincts but also affirms our capacity to connect, support, and emotionally invest in others—whether human, animal, or even inanimate objects designed to appear cute.
In sum, the caretaking response reflects both the evolutionary roots and cultural variability of cuteness. It activates instinctive nurturing impulses while also mobilizing moral and social engagement, encouraging behaviors that benefit both individuals and the wider community.

2.2. Socializing

Cuteness also plays an important role in promoting social interaction and emotional connection. When encountering something cute, people often feel compelled to touch, engage with, or speak to the object or being in question. This response frequently alters behavior and speech, for instance by prompting the use of higher-pitched, melodic tones known as infant-directed speech [19]. Far from being trivial, this speech pattern supports early language development and emotional bonding. Cute features act as social triggers, increasing motivation to connect, empathize, and interact in warm, prosocial ways. They are associated with greater willingness to engage, improved understanding of others’ emotions, and a more affectionate attitude. Enjoying cute things together, whether looking at baby animals, sharing stickers, or exchanging cute emojis, fosters direct social interaction and creates a sense of togetherness. In both digital and face-to-face settings, cute content often softens social situations, reduces tension, and makes communication feel more relaxed and friendly.
Beyond individual and group experiences, cultural norms also shape how cuteness supports social interaction. In Japan, for example, cute aesthetics are widely used in daily communication, public services, and corporate branding to make interactions more approachable and warm. These practices show how cuteness can be used intentionally to strengthen relationships and maintain social harmony [20]. Characters such as Hello Kitty, Doraemon, and Pikachu from Pokémon are employed not only in children’s media but also in corporate branding, public safety campaigns, and government communications. These designs soften the tone of otherwise impersonal or authoritative messages, encouraging more open and emotionally accessible interactions.
Ultimately, the social influence of cuteness extends far beyond brief encounters. It deepens emotional awareness, strengthens relationships through shared emotional experiences, and promotes a more caring and cooperative social environment.

2.3. Whimsical

In addition to evoking care and social engagement, cuteness can elicit whimsical responses, temporary feelings of delight, playfulness, and aesthetic enjoyment [12]. Unlike caretaking, which is rooted in evolutionary adaptation, whimsical responses are centered on amusement without a necessary need to protect or nurture the object. Such responses can be triggered by a wide range of stimuli, including toys, accessories, and decorative objects with exaggerated proportions, soft textures, or humorous designs [12].
Product designers and marketers often capitalize on this effect by incorporating cute features into everyday goods. For example, Lieber-Milo [21] found that kawaii stationery items evoke temporary enjoyment and fun in Japanese office settings, while Nenkov and Scott [12] showed that consumers exposed to whimsically cute products, such as a playful ice-cream scoop or decorative stapler, engaged in more indulgent or playful behaviors. These findings illustrate how cute and kawaii aesthetics are strategically incorporated into product design, extending the whimsical response into consumer culture.
Overall, whimsical reactions demonstrate the versatility of cuteness in everyday life, showing its ability to inspire imagination, delight, and playful engagement. They reveal how cuteness can transcend biological or social drives to provide moments of spontaneous joy and emotional relief, particularly in environments marked by stress or routine seriousness.

2.4. Cute Aggression

A particularly paradoxical emotional response, cute aggression refers to the expression of seemingly aggressive behaviors in response to extreme cuteness, such as clenching fists, gritting teeth, or expressing a desire to pinch or squeeze [11]. Crucially, these behaviors do not stem from a desire to harm but instead function as regulatory mechanisms to manage overwhelming positive emotions. Not everyone experiences cute aggression, and its intensity varies among individuals [11]. Some may feel physically overwhelmed by extreme cuteness, while others remain unaffected. This variation reflects individual differences in emotional regulation and further emphasizes the complexity of human responses to affective stimuli.
Cute aggression exemplifies the coexistence of seemingly contradictory affective impulses, affection and aggression, within a single emotional experience. It also highlights the body’s attempt to self-regulate strong affiliative emotions. In some cases, cute aggression may reinforce emotional engagement with the cute stimulus, deepening the sense of connection. Moreover, the expression of cute aggression can serve a social function. Phrases like “I could just eat you up” or playful gestures directed at pets or babies often act as affectionate signals within informal interactions. These responses provide a culturally accepted outlet for intense emotion, allowing individuals to express deep affection in socially appropriate ways and reinforcing emotional intimacy within close relationships.

2.5. Kama Muta

Kama muta, a Sanskrit term meaning “moved by love,” refers to a profound emotional response characterized by warmth, elevation, and a deepened sense of connection [13,14]. It is commonly accompanied by chills, tears, a warm feeling in the chest, or a sense of closeness and unity. Research shows that kama muta is frequently elicited by cute stimuli, particularly those that evoke tenderness, vulnerability, or nostalgia [13]. These include infants, animals, cherished objects, or symbolic representations of identity and belonging. For example, Steinnes [13] demonstrated experimentally that exposure to images of baby animals reliably elicited kama muta responses—including warmth, tears, and goosebumps—highlighting the direct link between cuteness and this heart-warming emotion. Similarly, Zickfeld et al. [22] conducted a large cross-cultural study with 3542 participants across 19 countries and 15 languages, finding that kama muta experiences were consistently associated with a warm feeling in the chest, moist eyes or tears, chills, a lump in the throat, buoyancy, and exhilaration. These experiences motivated affective devotion and moral commitment to communal sharing, confirming kama muta as a distinct, positive relational emotion recognized across cultures. As an emotional bridge, kama muta fosters bonding with others and enhances the salience of emotionally resonant experiences. While the term originates in Sanskrit, the underlying emotional experience appears to be cross-culturally recognized, though it may be labeled and expressed differently across societies.
Together, the five core responses, caretaking, socializing, whimsical, cute aggression, and kama muta, demonstrate the multifaceted emotional impact of cuteness. These reactions not only shape individual behavior but also promote prosocial tendencies and strengthen interpersonal bonds. To illustrate the preceding discussion, Table S1 provides an overview of the five emotional responses to cuteness, highlighting their key features and representative studies.
Building on this foundation, it is important to note that while these emotional responses have roots in evolutionary mechanisms, their expression is also influenced by cultural norms, social expectations, and personal experiences. One particularly influential factor is gender, where both biological predispositions and cultural conditioning shape how people perceive and react to cuteness.

3. The Gendered Dynamics of Cuteness

While the appeal of cuteness appears to be universal, research consistently shows that women exhibit greater sensitivity to and interest in cute stimuli compared to men [3,15,23,24]. This gender difference is typically attributed to a complex interplay of biological, hormonal, and cultural factors. From an evolutionary psychology perspective, women’s heightened responsiveness to cuteness is closely linked to caregiving roles. Across species, including humans, females have evolved to be attuned to infant needs, thereby promoting offspring survival [25,26,27]. Hormonal fluctuations across the reproductive cycle also influence sensitivity to cuteness, with studies showing that women’s perception of cute stimuli may increase during ovulation [23]. These biological factors suggest that women’s sensitivity to cuteness is evolutionarily adaptive.
However, biology alone does not account for the gendered dynamics of cuteness. Cultural norms and gendered socialization also play a critical role in shaping how individuals relate to cute entities. Societal expectations often encourage nurturing behaviors in women and associate femininity with qualities such as softness, sweetness, and visual aesthetics commonly found in cute design [28]. In Japanese culture, the aesthetics of kawaii (the Japanese term for “cute”) have historically been marketed to young women, who became both its primary consumers and cultural ambassadors [29,30,31]. Observational studies reveal how this association is reinforced from an early age. For example, Burdelski and Mitsuhashi [32] found that preschool teachers in Japan often encouraged girls to engage in cute-associated activities, such as cooking or playing with soft toys, while boys were steered toward activities emphasizing strength and independence. Girls were praised using terms like kawaii (cute), whereas boys were more often called kakoii (cool). Such linguistic and behavioral reinforcements subtly shape children’s perceptions of gender-appropriate behavior and aesthetics, embedding cuteness within the cultural construction of femininity.
Although kawaii culture originated in gendered consumer contexts, it has increasingly evolved to include broader demographics. Contemporary iterations of cuteness now extend beyond young women to encompass diverse age groups, subcultures, and gender identities. In sum, the gendered nature of cuteness reflects a dynamic interplay between biological instincts and sociocultural constructs. Women’s strong association with cuteness emerges from both evolutionary caregiving roles and deeply ingrained social norms that frame femininity around nurturance, softness, and emotional expressivity.

4. Pop Culture, Communication, and the Case of Japan

While gendered predispositions are important, they represent only one dimension of how cuteness operates. Cultural forces, expressed through pop culture, communication, and everyday artifacts, also play a central role in shaping how these emotions are experienced. In Japan, kawaii has become a cultural aesthetic embedded across media and consumer goods. Characters such as Hello Kitty and Pokémon exemplify how cultural icons harness cute traits to amplify playfulness and social bonding. By embedding cuteness in entertainment and daily life, pop culture extends emotional responses beyond direct encounters with infants or animals. Communication practices further reinforce this influence. Messaging apps and social media rely heavily on cute aesthetics, with emojis and stickers using baby-like proportions and soft designs to elicit warmth and friendliness [33,34,35]. Such cues soften interaction, reduce social distance, and encourage prosocial behaviour. As Nittono [3] notes, kawaii functions not only as an aesthetic but also as a social lubricant, promoting smoother interpersonal exchanges.
Although the appreciation of cuteness is a universal response observed across cultures, including the United States and Israel [15], Japan has uniquely developed kawaii into a pervasive cultural and societal phenomenon. This distinctiveness stems from factors such as ethnic homogeneity, island geography, and a structured social hierarchy [36]. In a society marked by rigid hierarchies, cuteness fosters intimacy and provides psychological relief, offering an escape from everyday formality [21]. Empirical studies support this role. Lieber-Milo [21] surveyed 692 Japanese women, including university students (average age = 21) and adult women (average age = 27) who were married, employed, or had children. Both groups expressed strong affection for kawaii products such as stuffed animals and pastel-colored items, challenging the assumption that cuteness is valued only by youth. Interviews with office workers further revealed that cute stationery evoked joy, excitement, and nostalgia, creating a relaxed atmosphere and reducing stress in workplace settings. These findings underscore the psychological benefits of kawaii in Japan, highlighting its role in fostering joy, alleviating stress, and strengthening social bonds.
Hence, the example of Japan shows that emotional responses to cuteness can be elicited not only by infants and animals but also by non-human artifacts. The following section further demonstrates that such traits extend to other age groups beyond infancy and to artificial intelligence, including robots and avatars.

5. Expanding the Boundaries of Cuteness

While much of the research on cuteness has focused on infants and young animals, recent studies show that emotional responses to cuteness are not limited to these groups. Cuteness can extend across the human lifespan and apply to inanimate objects or digital representations, provided they exhibit baby schema features.

5.1. Cuteness Beyond Infancy

Research suggests that adults and even elderly individuals can elicit responses similar to those evoked by babies. For example, Ihara and Nittono [7] found that adult smiles can be perceived as cute, generating positive emotional reactions. Similarly, Nittono [37] argues that elderly people may be perceived as cute due to shared traits with infants, such as vulnerability, gentleness, and a need for care. These findings demonstrate that cuteness is not confined to age but is instead linked to qualities that trigger caregiving instincts.

5.2. Cuteness in Objects and Digital Design

Cuteness also extends to non-living objects. When inanimate entities are designed with features resembling baby schema, such as large eyes, small noses, and round shapes, they can trigger similar emotional responses. This principle has been widely applied in product and character design, from stuffed animals to robots [38,39,40].
Digital environments further amplify this effect. Emojis, avatars, and interface icons are often created with exaggerated, childlike features to elicit warmth and emotional engagement [33,34]. Research by Lv et al. [35] shows that avatars designed with baby-like proportions receive more positive responses and greater tolerance for technological errors than their more adult-like counterparts. Likewise, Lieber-Milo et al. [41] found that cute-style avatars significantly increased users’ emotional engagement.
These findings show that the emotional appeal of cuteness transcends biology and operates across both physical and digital domains. Designers and marketers employ baby schema elements not only to attract attention but also to create emotional bonds, trust, and care. This broader application highlights the deep psychological power of cuteness in shaping human experience and interaction.

6. Discussion

This entry has synthesized current research on the psychological and emotional responses elicited by cuteness, drawing from studies in developmental psychology, neuroscience, and cultural analysis. The literature consistently shows that the sight of infants, young animals, and baby schema-inspired objects evokes strong emotional reactions such as caregiving impulses, playful engagement, and even aggression [2,3,11,12,13,14,42]. These responses are not mutually exclusive but often co-occur, underscoring the complexity of cuteness as a multifaceted emotional trigger [11,19,43].
Importantly, the emotional impact of cuteness is shaped not only by biological predispositions but also by social and cultural forces. Gender differences have been widely observed in sensitivity to cute stimuli, with women frequently showing greater emotional intensity [24,44,45]. While the underlying caregiving motivation appears shared across genders, women’s heightened responses may be influenced by a combination of hormonal, evolutionary, and culturally reinforced caregiving roles. Taken together, these findings suggest that the psychology of cuteness reflects an interplay of universal human mechanisms and socially conditioned variations, making it a powerful lens for understanding both individual behavior and cultural expression [46].
Japan provides a particularly prominent case in which cuteness has been elaborated into the cultural aesthetic of kawaii. Far beyond a personal emotional reaction, kawaii functions as shared cultural language that shapes communication, consumer behavior, and even public policy [3,29,31]. Mascots, characters such as Hello Kitty and Pokémon, and the corporate or governmental use of kawaii imagery illustrate how emotional responses to cuteness are embedded in everyday social life. This cultural elaboration demonstrates how cuteness is not only biologically rooted but also socially cultivated, reducing social distance, and fostering group belonging. The Japanese case highlights how cultural frameworks can intensify, normalize, or redirect the universal affective power of cuteness.
Cuteness also extends beyond infants and animals to inanimate and digital domains such as avatars, toys, mascots, and emojis, especially when they incorporate baby schema features or evoke emotional familiarity [39,41]. This expansion shows that cuteness functions not only as an evolutionary trigger but also as a symbolic and affective resource across modern communication and media.
The enduring appeal of cuteness may reflect a broader human need for connection, comfort, and emotional regulation. In an increasingly digital and fast-paced world, the reassurance and warmth offered by cute stimuli may help explain their growing presence across marketing, entertainment, and public messaging. The emotional richness of cuteness, from caretaking to cute aggression, underscores its importance as both a psychological driver and a culturally meaningful phenomenon.
This entry has introduced the five main emotional responses identified in current research but also points to several open questions. Are additional emotions elicited by the sight of cuteness? Which responses are the strongest, and which tend to co-occur? Are these feelings consistent across cultures, or do they vary significantly? While cross-cultural research has begun to address these questions, systematic studies are still needed. Taken together, these insights show that while our knowledge has grown, cuteness remains a fascinating subject that continues to invite further research.

7. Conclusions

Cuteness operates as a powerful psychological and social force, influencing emotional responses, interpersonal behavior, and cultural expression. This entry has explored five key emotional reactions to cute stimuli: caretaking, socializing, whimsical, cute aggression, and kama muta, each contributing to a nuanced understanding of how cuteness shapes human experience. Across disciplines, research consistently shows that exposure to baby schema features, whether in infants, animals, or designed objects, evokes strong affective responses that foster empathy, connection, and prosocial behavior.
Understanding these emotional dynamics offers valuable insights into empathy, motivation, and the foundations of human connection. As cuteness becomes increasingly integrated into digital communication, product design, marketing, and therapeutic settings, its emotional impact shapes how individuals construct identity, manage stress, and foster social bonds in a rapidly changing world. The Japanese case of kawaii shows the power of cuteness in fostering social connection, softening public images, and providing comfort in stressful situations.
Future research should examine how biological, cultural, and technological factors converge to shape responses to cuteness, with particular attention to its roles in human–AI interaction, mental health, and global media aesthetics. By pursuing these directions, scholars can advance our understanding of cuteness not merely as a visual aesthetic but as an evolving emotional and cultural force with lasting significance in human life.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/encyclopedia5030146/s1, Table S1: Theories and Emotional Responses to Cuteness.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Israeli Center for Integration in Science”, grant number 1001481564.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Buckley, R.C. Aww: The Emotion of Perceiving Cuteness. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lorenz, K. Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung. Z. Tierpsychol. 1943, 5, 235–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nittono, H. The two-layer model of ‘kawaii’: A behavioural science framework for understanding kawaii and cuteness. East Asian, J. Pop. Cult. 2016, 2, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Glocker, M.L.; Langleben, D.D.; Ruparel, K.; Loughead, J.W.; Valdez, J.N.; Griffin, M.D.; Sachser, N.; Gur, R.C. Baby Schema Modulates the Brain Reward System in Nulliparous Women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 9115–9119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Borgi, M.; Cogliati-Dezza, I.; Brelsford, V.; Meints, K.; Cirulli, F. Baby schema in human and animal faces induces cuteness perception and gaze allocation in children. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. DeBruine, L.M.; Hahn, A.C.; Jones, B.C. Perceiving Infant Faces. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2016, 7, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ihara, N.; Nittono, H. Osanasa no Teido ni Yoru Kawaii no Kategori Bunrui (Categorization of Kawaii by the Level of Infantility). Stud. Hum. Sci. Bull. Grad. Sch. Integr. Arts Sci. Hiroshima Univ. 2011, 6, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nittono, H.; Ihara, N. Psychophysiological responses to kawaii pictures with or without baby schema. SAGE Open 2017, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kringelbach, M.L.; Stark, E.A.; Alexander, C.; Bornstein, M.H.; Stein, A. On cuteness: Unlocking the parental brain and beyond. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2016, 20, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Endendijk, J.J.; Smit, A.K.; van Baar, A.L.; Bos, P.A. What a Cute Baby! Preliminary Evidence from an fMRI Study for the Association Between Mothers’ Neural Responses to Infant Faces and Activation of the Parental Care System. Neuropsychologia 2020, 143, 107493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aragón, O.R.; Clark, M.S.; Dyer, R.L.; Bargh, J.A. Dimorphous expressions of positive emotion: Displays of both care and cute aggression in response to cute stimuli. Psychol. Sci. 2015, 26, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nenkov, G.Y.; Scott, M.L. “So cute I could eat it up”: Priming effects of cute products on indulgent consumption. J. Consum. Res. 2014, 41, 326–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Steinnes, K.K. Too Cute for Words: Cuteness Evokes the Kama Muta Emotion and Motivates Communal Sharing. Master’s Thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Steinnes, K.K.; Blomster, J.K.; Seibt, B.; Zickfeld, J.H.; Fiske, A.P. Too cute for words: Cuteness evokes the heart-warming emotion of kama muta. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nittono, H.; Lieber-Milo, S.; Dale, P.J. Cross-cultural comparisons of the cute and related concepts in Japan, the United States, and Israel. SAGE Open 2021, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Doebel, S.; Stucke, N.J.; Pang, S. Kindchenschema and cuteness elicit interest in caring for and playing with young children, but less so when children are masked. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sherman, G.D.; Haidt, J.; Coan, J.A. Viewing cute images increases behavioral carefulness. Emotion 2009, 9, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, J. Cognitive and neurological mechanisms of cuteness perception: A new perspective on moral education. Mind Brain Educ. 2020, 14, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thiessen, E.D.; Hill, E.A.; Saffran, J.R. Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy 2005, 7, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lieber-Milo, S. The Macro and Micro Aspects and Effects of Kawaii. Ph.D. Thesis, Osaka University, Suita, Japan, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lieber-Milo, S. Pink purchasing: Interrogating the soft power of Japan’s kawaii consumption. J. Consum. Cult. 2022, 22, 747–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zickfeld, J.H.; Schubert, T.W.; Seibt, B.; Blomster, J.K.; Arriaga, P.; Basabe, N.; Blaut, A.; Caballero, A.; Carrera, P.; Dalgar, I.; et al. Kama muta: Conceptualizing and measuring the experience often labelled being moved across 19 nations and 15 languages. Emotion 2019, 19, 402–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lobmaier, J.S.; Probst, F.; Perrett, D.I.; Heinrichs, M. Menstrual cycle phase affects discrimination of infant cuteness. Horm. Behav. 2015, 70, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maestripieri, D.; Pelka, S. Sex differences in interest in babies across the lifespan. Hum. Nat. 2002, 13, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Christov-Moore, L.; Simpson, E.A.; Coudé, G.; Grigaityte, K.; Iacoboni, M.; Ferrari, P.F. Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 46, 604–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Waal, F.B.M. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society; Three Rivers Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  27. De Waal, F.B.M. The antiquity of empathy. Science 2012, 336, 874–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Löffler, C.S.; Greitemeyer, T. Are Women the More Empathetic Gender? The Effects of Gender Role Expectations. Curr. Psychol. 2021, 42, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kinsella, S. Cuties in Japan. In Women, Media and Consumption in Japan; Skov, L., Moeran, B., Eds.; University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1995; pp. 220–254. [Google Scholar]
  30. Monden, M. Japanese Fashion Cultures: Dress and Gender in Contemporary Japan; Bloomsbury: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yano, C.R. Pink Globalization: Hello Kitty’s Trek Across the Pacific; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  32. Burdelski, M.; Mitsuhashi, K. She thinks you’re kawaii: Socializing affect, gender, and relationships in a Japanese preschool. Lang. Soc. 2010, 39, 65–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Coyle, M.A.; Carmichael, C.L. Perceived Responsiveness in Text Messaging: The Role of Emoji Use. Comput. Human Behav. 2019, 99, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gn, J. Emoji as a “Language” of Cuteness. First Monday 2018, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lv, X.; Liu, Y.; Luo, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, C. Does a Cute Artificial Intelligence Assistant Soften the Blow? The Impact of Cuteness on Customer Tolerance of Assistant Service Failure. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 87, 103114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lieber-Milo, S.; Nittono, H. From a word to a commercial power: A brief introduction to the kawaii aesthetic in contemporary Japan. Innov. Res. Jpn. Stud. 2019, 3, 13–32. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nittono, H. Kawaii no Chikara: Jikken de Saguru Sono Shinri (The Power of Cute: A View from Experimental Psychology); Kagaku Dojin: Tokyo, Japan, 2019; Available online: https://www.amazon.co.jp/exec/obidos/ASIN/475981681X/cp0c-22/ (accessed on 30 July 2025).
  38. Goan, M.; Fujii, H.; Okada, M. Child–Robot Interaction Mediated by Building Blocks: From Field Observations in a Public Space. Artif. Life Robot. 2006, 10, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miesler, L.; Leder, H.; Herrmann, A. Isn’t It Cute: An Evolutionary Perspective of Baby-Schema Effects in Visual Product Designs. Int. J. Des. 2011, 5, 17–30. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nishiwaki, Y.; Furukawa, M.; Yoshikawa, S.; Karatas, N.; Okada, M. iBones: A Weak Robot to Construct Mutual Coordination for Handing Out Tissue Packs. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interactio, Vienna, Austria, 6–9 March 2017; p. 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lieber-Milo, S.; Amihai-Humbeuger, Y.; Yonezawa, T.; Kazunori, S. Cuteness in Avatar Design: A Cross-Cultural Study on the Influence of Baby Schema Features and Other Visual Characteristics. AI Soc. 2025, 40, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sherman, G.D.; Haidt, J. Cuteness and disgust: The humanizing and dehumanizing effects of emotion. Emotion Rev. 2011, 3, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stavropoulos, K.K.M.; Alba, L.A. “It’s so Cute I Could Crush It!”: Understanding neural mechanisms of cute aggression. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lobmaier, J.S.; Sprengelmeyer, R.; Wiffen, B.; Perrett, D.I. Female and male responses to cuteness, age and emotion in infant faces. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2010, 31, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nittono, H.; Ohashi, A.; Komori, M. Creation and validation of the Japanese cute infant face (JCIF) dataset. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 819428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schaller, M. The parental care motivational system and why it matters (for everyone). Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2018, 27, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lieber-Milo, S. Cuteness and Its Emotional Responses. Encyclopedia 2025, 5, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030146

AMA Style

Lieber-Milo S. Cuteness and Its Emotional Responses. Encyclopedia. 2025; 5(3):146. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lieber-Milo, Shiri. 2025. "Cuteness and Its Emotional Responses" Encyclopedia 5, no. 3: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030146

APA Style

Lieber-Milo, S. (2025). Cuteness and Its Emotional Responses. Encyclopedia, 5(3), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030146

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop