Next Article in Journal
Retrospective Evaluation of the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Control Strategies Implemented by the Victorian Government in Melbourne—A Proposal for a Standardized Approach to Review and Reappraise Control Measures
Previous Article in Journal
Associations between Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Maternal Attitudes towards Childhood Vaccination in Cyprus—A Cross-Sectional Survey
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

COVID Pandemics and Inland Transportation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Note on the Risks of Infection in Typical Passenger Vessels

by
Harlysson W. S. Maia
1,
Jassiel V. H. Fontes
1,*,
Daniel Silva Bitencourtt
1,
Edgar Mendoza
2,
Rodolfo Silva
2,
Irving D. Hernández
3 and
Hector Reis Almeida
1
1
Departamento de Engenharia Naval, Escola Superior de Tecnologia, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus 69050-020, Brazil
2
Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
3
Núcleo de Estruturas Oceânicas (NEO), Programa de Engenharia Oceânica, COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21945-970, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
COVID 2023, 3(8), 1052-1062; https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3080077
Submission received: 7 July 2023 / Revised: 22 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023

Abstract

:
Located in the center of the largest river basin in the world, the State of Amazonas in Brazil has an extensive network of more than 20 thousand kilometers of navigable waterways, which is the main mode of transportation between localities, both for cargo and passengers. The region is practically disconnected from the rest of the country due to the lack of roads. Thus, the Amazon River network acted as an efficient means of transmission of the new coronavirus (COVID-19), rapidly transforming the region into an epicenter of the pandemic with one of the highest infection rates in Brazil. Despite the adoption of national and state measures to combat new infections, the situation continued to deteriorate for reasons still under investigation. Given this scenario, this work aims to identify possible infection risks in typical passenger vessels used in the Brazilian Amazon. Three case studies of different passenger vessels were considered, discussing possible scenarios that could allow the spread of COVID and proposing some recommendations for infection prevention. It is hoped that this communication will contribute to the dissemination of information related to the typical means of long-distance passenger transport in the Amazon, to the planning of infectious disease prevention strategies on board regional ships and to ensure a sustainable future for the Amazonian population. Furthermore, this research aims to contribute to the sustainable development goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda on health and well-being.

1. Introduction

The Brazilian Amazon basin represents about 60% of the Brazilian river network [1] and covers almost nine states (Figure 1). Most of the municipalities and communities in the Brazilian Amazon are located along the rivers, where road and rail networks are virtually non-existent. As a result, there is little connectivity between the communities, the main northern cities and the rest of the country [2,3]. It is estimated that about 80% of the transport of people and goods in the region is carried out by water. Given this scenario, inland navigation is one of the most important modes of transport in the Amazon region, with relevance for the movement of people and, consequently, for the maintenance of jobs and services in the regional society [4].
Although the region has traditionally been considered remote and practically disconnected from the rest of the country in terms of transportation, the region has been severely affected by the pandemic of the new coronavirus (COVID-19), as presented in [6]. This is an issue of concern for the search for strategies to ensure a sustainable future of the Amazonian population, as highlighted in the third UN Sustainable Development Goal related to the good health and well-being of all people, without distinction [7].
Turkewitz and Andreoni [6] described the serious situation in the riverside municipalities of the Amazon/Solimões river around July 2020. It was noted that the adoption of protocols with restrictive measures regarding the transport of passengers by water was not enough to prevent the large number of deaths and infections due to the new coronavirus.
Perhaps the first infection scenarios were observed with people arriving in the region by air transport. Then, the Amazon’s complex river network, essential for transporting cargo and passengers, contributed to the transmission of the new virus to riverine communities, quickly transforming the region into one of the epicenters of the pandemic, with one of the highest infection rates in the world. It is important to note that in the Amazon region alone, approximately nine million passengers a year use river transport for state, interstate, and national travel [8].
Following the classification of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the worsening of the situation in the northern region of Brazil, national government agencies issued response measures. Some of these measures were specifically related to the transport of passengers by water, such as Resolution No. 7653 of 31 March 2020 [9] and No. 3 of 27 May 2020 [10]. These documents deal with general provisions on board vessels and in port facilities, such as a minimum distance of two meters between passengers, the use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), limitation of 50% of the passenger capacity of vessels, embarkation and disembarkation restrictions and mandatory guidance for passengers and crew provided by shipping companies, among others.
Despite these measures, the situation continued to worsen. In March, river passenger transport was banned in the Brazilian Amazon [11]. In July 2020, the six Brazilian cities with the highest rates of exposure to the virus were located along the banks of the Solimões/Amazonas River, with higher values than in Brazilian cities in other regions. For example, at that time, the probability of being infected in Tefé, a municipality of 60,000 inhabitants, was the same as in New York, one of the most populated metropolitan areas in the world [6]. In July 2021, during the “second wave” of the pandemic, Brazil still had the second highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the world, and the state of Amazonas had the highest mortality rate in the country [12].
Scudellari [13], together with health experts, presented a review with models and projections of the pandemic in future years. In all scenarios, the experts agreed that new seasonal pandemic outbreaks would occur even after the vaccination of most of the world’s population. The main reason would be the high mutation rate of the virus. In this scenario, new preventive measures are urgently needed, as there are new discoveries about the characteristics of the virus and its mutations.
Due to the recent catastrophic public health situation in the Amazon region and worldwide as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, a future scenario with periodic resurgence of airborne virus infections is possible [13]. Given the high risk of infection through waterway transport, it is urgent to identify potential risks in order to develop new infection prevention measures on vessels and passenger terminals. This is relevant in the Amazon region and other similar regions of the world, where water transport is necessary for daily activities and where regulation of ship operations is scarce, particularly in remote regions.
This brief communication aims to discuss the potential risks of infection in typical vessels used for the transport of passengers and cargo in the Brazilian Amazon, considering those commonly used in the State of Amazonas. First, relevant proposals for maritime regulations to prevent COVID-19 infection are presented. Then, the main potential areas of infection are discussed for three common vessels in the region, named as: Gaiola/recreio, Expresso and Regional ferryboat. It is hoped that the present research will serve as a basis for the development of new protocols for the prevention of COVID-19 infection based on recommended maritime practices and regulations, as well as new knowledge on the process of virus spread.
This work is organized as follows: Section 2 summarizes key maritime recommendations for COVID-19 infection prevention. Section 3 introduces and describes the three regional passenger ships and Section 4 discusses potential risks of COVID-19 infection in these vessels. Finally, Section 5 summarizes the conclusions of the present work.

2. COVID-19 Prevention Recommendations for Maritime Transport

Following the classification of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the worsening health situation in the northern region of Brazil, Brazilian government agencies adopted response measures. Some of them were targeted to waterborne passenger transport, such as Resolution No. 7653 of 31 March 2020 [9] and No. 3 of 27 May 2020 [10]. These resolutions deal with measures on board vessels and in port facilities.
International resolutions and guidelines can be cited in this regard, such as the Guide for Public Transportation Pandemic Planning and Response, issued by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) [14], the Circular Letter No. 4204 and addenda, issued by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) [15], Guidelines on the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID-19 outbreak, issued by the European Commission [16], and others.
As regards the practical measures established on the basis of these regulations in relation to vessels and passenger terminals, the following should be highlighted:
Use of face masks in circulation environments (surgical type, PFF2 or N95).
Provision of alcohol gel at circulation points on ships and passenger terminals.
Use of alcohol gel or hand hygiene with soap and water whenever possible.
Frequent cleaning of environments and surfaces.
Prohibit symptomatic passengers from boarding.
Social distancing (1.5 to 2.0 m) in circulation areas.
Limit maximum capacity in common areas with seats.
Communicate prevention measures through signs, banners, monitors and other media.
Use membranes to separate environments, seats and hammocks.
Adopt new air filters for air conditioning, such UV and ozone filters.
Adopt indoor air quality detectors for CO2 level (ppm, NDIR-Non-dispersive Infrared sensors).
Adopt forced ventilation systems in enclosed environments.
Contactless ticketing for boarding and other vessel activities.

3. Description of Regional Passenger Vessels

3.1. Traditional Passenger Boat (Gaiola)

One of the most common and traditional vessels in the Amazon region, for the transport of passengers and general cargo, are the gaiolas (“cages”) or “recreios”. The typical general layout of this type of vessel is multi-deck, with cargo stowage areas on the lower and main decks and passenger areas on the upper decks [17]. The average values for the main dimensions are ~28 m in length and ~7 m in width. The average age of vessels is ~13 years and average capacity ~150 passengers [18]. Their routes connect municipalities and local communities (longitudinal transport). Examples of this traditional type of vessel are shown in Figure 2a,b.
According to regional tradition, the origin of the term “gaiola” comes from the arrangement of hammock zones, where passengers swing back and forth, like a bird in a cage [17]. An example of a hammock zone is shown in Figure 2c.
The multideck arrangement with a displacement monohull design dates back to the mid-19th century, when the first steam-powered vessels were introduced to the region, sailing from the ports of Belém, Pará, Brazil, passing through the port of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil (Figure 2d), and arriving at the port of Nauta, Peru [19].
Figure 2. (a) Side of a gaiola vessel. (b) A complete view of a gaiola vessel in the port of Manaus. Credits: Daniel Bitencourtt. (c) Typical hammock area arrangement in a gaiola vessel. (d) Porto de Manaus, nowadays. Figure credits: (ac) Daniel Bitencourtt, 2021; (d) [20].
Figure 2. (a) Side of a gaiola vessel. (b) A complete view of a gaiola vessel in the port of Manaus. Credits: Daniel Bitencourtt. (c) Typical hammock area arrangement in a gaiola vessel. (d) Porto de Manaus, nowadays. Figure credits: (ac) Daniel Bitencourtt, 2021; (d) [20].
Covid 03 00077 g002
The upper decks, typically reserved for passengers, have some cabins in the bow region and large open areas reserved for hammocks, with a minimum area of one passenger per m2 [21], usually between the center of the ship and the aft region. If a vessel has a galley and a dining room (70% of the fleet) [18], they are typically located in the aft area of the main deck.
As technology evolved, steam engines were replaced by more efficient diesel engines. Hull and superstructure design also evolved, although larger boats were still being built in wood. When welding processes became available, the same traditional shipbuilding methods, such as a transversely reinforced structure and displacement hull forms, that were used in the construction of new vessels were retained but using combined materials [17]. Today, both materials are used in the construction of new vessels, but wood is slowly being replaced by other materials. In 2009, 95% of the Amazon fleet was built with wood [22]. In 2013, this percentage dropped to 61.6%, followed by 15.7% steel, 13.6% aluminum, and 9.1% fiberglass and other composite vessels [18]. This decline is due to several factors, including increasingly stringent regulations issued by state and municipal environmental agencies regarding the legalization of wood used in shipbuilding [23].

3.2. Fast Passenger Ship (Expresso)

“Expressos” are another longitudinal transport option in the region, pre-planning steel or aluminum boats. With high length/beam ratio (a narrower beam for the same length as a traditional boat), small superstructures and powerful engines, expressos make faster trips on routes similar to gaiolas, reducing trips times from days to a few hours [18]. The cost is a more expensive ticket, and there are fewer seats. Examples of expressos operating in the state of Amazonas are shown in Figure 3a.
The typical layout of an expresso is that of a semi-displacement monohull with a single deck, where the passenger seating is located, similar to the layout of a bus, as shown in Figure 3b. Toilets are usually located in the aft section. As their voyages normally do not exceed 12 h, they do not require a galley or refectory room [21].

3.3. Regional Ferryboat

Amazon ferries are barge-type hulled, flat-bottomed vessels. This type of hull is easier to build due to its simpler shapes and lines, which results in larger deck areas [17]. The mean length and beam of this type of vessel are larger than those of traditional vessels, but they operate with shallow drafts. The larger size of ferries translates into a greater capacity for passengers and general cargo. These vessels operate longitudinal (between cities and municipalities) and transverse (river crossings) routes.
Smaller ferries, used mainly for transverse transport, may have a single deck (with physical separation between cargo stowage areas and areas reserved for passengers [21]), but the most common arrangement is a multi-deck design. Some examples are shown in Figure 4a–c.
In this common arrangement, the main deck is used to accommodate cars (e.g., Figure 4a), trucks, and other general and/or heavy cargo (Figure 4d), with an access ramp at the bow (most common). The upper decks are reserved for passengers in air-conditioned (or not) seating areas. In larger ferries for longer routes, there may be some additional cabins (and galleys for trips longer than 12 h [21]).

4. Identification of Infection Risks in the Amazonian Scenario

4.1. Traditional Passenger Boat (Gaiola)

The passenger areas (hammocks and seats) and circulation areas of the gaiolas, the type of vessel preferred by some users due to the lower cost of tickets compared to other vessels, are mainly spacious and ventilated areas with large windows, as shown in Figure 5a.
Since the most important factor for infection prevention is the renewal of ambient air, forced ventilation is not usually applied in these open areas. Otherwise, as these hammock areas tend to be crowded (Figure 5b), physical barriers, such as the use of masks and separation membranes, would be more appropriate.
The other common passenger areas on a gaiola vessel are the cabins (e.g., Figure 5c), which are limited air-conditioned areas for one or two people, with a private bathroom, a mini fridge (commonly) and a bunk bed. Specific measures for cabins would be the adoption of UV air filters or ozone in the air-conditioning system.
All the other measures would be taken in common and private areas of the vessel (including cabins and hammock areas), such as the use of face masks, prohibiting symptomatic passengers from boarding, frequent use of alcohol gel and cleaning of surfaces, social distancing, issuance of non-contact tickets, use of air quality detectors and communication of prevention measures, such as the sign shown in Figure 5d.

4.2. Fast Passenger Ship (Expresso)

Expressos are faster options for the same routes as gaiolas. As travel time is reduced, the potential exposure time to a virus is also reduced. Otherwise, the interior layout is confined, similar to that of a bus or airplane, with a main deck with rows of seats on the sides and an aisle in the center/centerline of the vessel, as seen in Figure 6.
Most expressos have sliding windows and air conditioning. Considering this scenario, preventive measures would be the adoption of UV or ozone filters in the air-conditioning, separation membranes, air quality detectors, mandatory use of face masks, frequent use of alcohol gel and cleaning of surfaces.

4.3. Regional Ferryboat

Passenger spaces on ferries are similar to those on gaiolas, but in larger areas. Crossing ferries usually have seating areas with sliding windows, with or without air-conditioning, as shown in Figure 7. Appropriate measures would include mandatory use of face masks, use of UV or ozone filters in the air-conditioning, forced ventilation (if operating with windows closed), separation membranes, seating signage to enforce social distancing, air quality detectors, frequent use of alcohol gels and surface cleaning.
Larger ferries (for longer trips) may have seating and hammock areas, as in the arrangement shown in Figure 7. The recommended measures for hammock areas on ferries would be the same for hammock areas in gaiola vessels. All the other measures are recommended for general circulation areas on ferries.
Despite the preventive measures recommended by national and international regulations, it is important to encourage research and the development of engineering studies to identify potential infection risks on ships. A relevant issue is related to the proper distribution of passengers in different types of vessels. At the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, regional regulations encouraged the maintenance of a minimum distance of 1.5 m between people and the mandatory use of face masks [26]. However, specific regulations for different types of vessels, based on scientific research, are still lacking. Therefore, it is important to investigate this topic in order to plan possible response strategies.
In recent years, research has been conducted on the potential for COVID-19 virus transmission on cruise ships [27,28,29,30], considering the case of the Diamond Princess cruise ship, which was anchored in the port of Yokohama, Japan, since 3 February 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic. In addition, [31] has investigated the control of COVID-19 infection on board, while Jerome [32] proposed practical procedures to monitor potential infection on board ships.
On the other hand, recent engineering studies have investigated adequate layout of passengers and cargo areas of passenger vessels using numerical methods [33,34], as well as the duration and health impact of COVID-19 outbreaks in cargo vessels using mathematical approaches [35]. Huang et al. [33,34] used computational fluid dynamics methods to evaluate the dispersion of airborne fluids, such as those derived from coughing, and proposed guidance on the recommended passenger distribution to avoid interaction with the fluid. The most recent application of this approach has been presented by [36], who investigated the distribution of COVID-19 viruses on a fishing vessel, considering various wind and wave conditions. These types of studies could be extended to determine suitable configurations of different types of vessels employed for a wide range of activities in the Amazon, such as smaller, high-speed vessels [37] and floating structures [38]. These marine devices can be used in the Amazon rivers for fishing, scholar transport, research, health care and ambulance services, among other activities involving the transport of groups of people.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the problem of the COVID-19 pandemic in river transportation in the Amazon region was presented in a synthetic way. Three common types of passenger transport vessels in the State of Amazonas were described: gaiola/recreio, expresso and regional ferryboat. These vessels are used in daily activities on the Amazon waterways. The gaiola and ferryboat vessels operate on a displacement basis, which allows for the transportation of a large number of people, while Expresso vessels are semi-displacement vessels that move faster and are used in longitudinal transportation. Like bus transport, these vessels may not have a safe distance between seats, and sometimes there is a lack of regulation on the Amazonian waterways, resulting in unsafe situations. It is concluded that there are different needs to achieve the suggestions of international agencies to prevent infection by airborne viruses. One way to address these obstacles could be to improve the training of crews and users regarding the implementation of preventive procedures. In addition, there is a need for increased enforcement during the trips and at port facilities to ensure that vessels follow prevention guidelines. It is hoped that this communication will disseminate information regarding typical long-distance river transport modes in the Amazon region, which may be helpful for planning and implementing strategies to minimize infectious disease risks in the future. This, in turn, can contribute to the achievement of the third UN Sustainability Developing Goal, which seeks the health and well-being of all people.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W.S.M. and J.V.H.F.; methodology, H.W.S.M. and J.V.H.F.; software, H.W.S.M. and J.V.H.F.; validation, H.W.S.M.; formal analysis, H.W.S.M. and J.V.H.F.; investigation, H.W.S.M., J.V.H.F. and D.S.B.; resources, J.V.H.F. and H.W.S.M.; data curation, J.V.H.F., H.R.A. and H.W.S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W.S.M., J.V.H.F., R.S., I.D.H. and E.M.; writing—review and editing, J.V.H.F., R.S., I.D.H., D.S.B., H.R.A. and E.M.; visualization, H.W.S.M., J.V.H.F., H.R.A. and D.S.B.; supervision, H.W.S.M. and J.V.H.F.; project administration, H.W.S.M. and J.V.H.F.; funding acquisition, J.V.H.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by Governo do Estado do Amazonas with resources from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas—FAPEAM, call N°014/2021—Programa de Apoio para a Popularização e Divulgação para CT&I—PAPD/FAPEAM (process number 01.02.016301.04081/2022-74), and by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq, Brasil, call N°014/2021—CNPq-FNDCT-MCTI—Faixa A, (process number 405529/2022-8). The APC was funded by the first author (J.V.H.F.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the partial support provided by FAPEAM (call N°010/2021—PAPD/FAPEAM, process number 01.02.016301.04081/2022-74) and by CNPq (call N°014/2021—CNPq-FNDCT-MCTI—Faixa A, process number 405529/2022-8). J.V.H.F. thanks the research grant provided by FAPEAM, call N°013/2022—Programa FAPEAM Produtividade em CT&I). The support provided by GPA/UEA—Universidade do Estado do Amazonas is acknowledged. H.R.A. thanks the support provided by Programa PAPD/FAPEAM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ang, W.J.; Park, E.; Alcantara, E. Mapping Floodplain Bathymetry in the Middle-Lower Amazon River Using Inundation Frequency and Field Control. Geomorphology 2021, 392, 107937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fearnside, P.M. Highway Construction as a Force in Destruction of the Amazon Forest. Handb. Road Ecol. 2015, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Viana, V.M.; Cenamo, M.C.; Pavan, M.N.; Carrero, G.C.; Quinlan, M.D. Railroads in the Amazon: A Key Strategy for Reducing Deforestation. Carbon Clim. Law Rev. 2008, 2, 292–299. [Google Scholar]
  4. Maia, H.W.; Said, M. Analysis for Resistance Reduction of an Amazon School Boat Through Hull Shape Modification Utilizing a CFD Tool. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 2019, 53, 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fontes, J.V.H.; de Almeida, P.R.R.; Hernández, I.D.; Maia, H.W.S.; Mendoza, E.; Silva, R.; Santander, E.J.O.; Marques, R.T.S.F.; Soares, N.L.; do N. Soares, N.L.; et al. Marine Accidents in the Brazilian Amazon: Potential Risks to the Aquatic Environment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Turkewitz, J.; Andreoni, M. The Amazon, Giver of Life, Unleashes the Pandemic. New York Times. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/25/world/americas/coronavirus-brazil-amazon.html (accessed on 9 February 2021).
  7. UN United Nations: The 17 Goals for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  8. ANTAQ Coronavírus: ANTAQ Publica Resolução Com Medidas Restritivas Em Relação 439 Ao Transporte Aquaviário de Passageiros e Às Instalações Portuárias; Agência Nacional de Transportes Aquaviários. Available online: https://www.gov.br/antaq/pt-br/noticias/2021/coronavirus-antaq-publica-resolucao-com-medidas-restritivas-em-relacao-ao-transporte-aquaviario-de-passageiros-e-as-instalacoes-portuarias (accessed on 15 March 2023).
  9. IN Ministério Da Infraestrutura/ANTAQ. Resolução Nro. 7.653, de 31 de Março de 2020. Available online: https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/resolucao-n-7.653-de-31-de-marco-de-2020-250914597 (accessed on 9 February 2021).
  10. IN Ministério Da Infraestrutura/Comissão Nacional Das Autoridades Nos Portos. Resolução Nro. 3, de 27 de Maio de 2020. Available online: https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/resolucao-n-3-de-27-de-maio-de-2020-258768579 (accessed on 9 February 2021).
  11. SEAS Poder Executivo Do Estado Do AM. Decreto Nro. 42.145 de 31 de Março de 2020. Available online: http://www.seas.am.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Decreto-No.42.145-31-de-mar%C3%A7o.pdf (accessed on 9 February 2021).
  12. Painelcoronavírus Ministério Da Saúde. COVID19 Painel Coronavírus. Available online: https://covid.saude.gov.br (accessed on 9 February 2021).
  13. Scudellari, M. How the Pandemic Might Play out in 2021 and Beyond. Nature 2020, 584, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fletcher, K.; Amarakoon, S.; Haskell, J.; Penn, P.; Wilmoth, M.; Matherly, D.; Langdon, N. A Guide for Public Transportation Pandemic Planning and Response; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. IMO Advice via Circular Letter for IMO Member States, Seafarers and Shipping. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/C19CLs.aspx (accessed on 27 September 2022).
  16. OP Communication from the Commission Guidelines Concerning the Exercise of the Free Movement of Workers during COVID-19 Outbreak 2020/C 102 I/03. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4a6b915e-728d-11ea-a07e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed on 27 August 2022).
  17. Moretto, N.B. Análise Estrutural de Embarcações Tipo Ferry-Boat Da Região Amazônica; UFSC; Federal University of Santa Catarina: Joinville, Brazil, 2016. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar]
  18. ANTAQ Caracterização Da Oferta e Da Demanda Do Transporte Fluvial de Passageiros e Cargas Na Região Amazônica. Available online: https://www.transportabrasil.com.br/2013/08/antaq-divulga-estudo-sobre-transporte-fluvial-de-passageiros-da-regiao-amazonica/ (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  19. Britto, R.K.L. A Introdução Da Navegação a Vapor Na Amazônia No Século XIX: O Processo de Formação Da Companhia de Navegação e Comércio Do Amazonas. In Proceedings of the XII Congresso Brasileiro de História Econômica, Niterói, Brazil, 28–30 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fontes, J.V.; de Almeida, P.R.; Maia, H.W.; Hernández, I.D.; Rodríguez, C.A.; Silva, R.; Mendoza, E.; Esperança, P.T.; Sanches, R.A.; Mounsif, S. Marine Accidents in the Brazilian Amazon: The Problems and Challenges in the Initiatives for Their Prevention Focused on Passenger Ships. Sustainability 2023, 15, 328. [Google Scholar]
  21. Marinha-do-Brasil. Normas Da Autoridade Marítima Para Embarcações Empregadas Na Navegação Interior—NORMAM-02/DPC; Marinha do Brasil: Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. NEAPL Plano de Desenvolvimento Preliminar: APL de Construção Naval—Cidade Polo: Manaus; 2009. (In Portuguese). Available online: https://www.sedecti.am.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/pdp_-apl_-construcao-naval-v_41.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2023).
  23. da Roch, S.; Gil, J.; Scherer, E.F. Naval Workers: Artisanal Know-How at Traditional Shipyards on the Riverside off Manaus. Rev. Pegada 2018, 19, 33026. [Google Scholar]
  24. Amazonprince Amazon Prince: Pesca Esportiva Na Amazônia. Available online: http://www.amazonprince.com/static/img/barcos/camarote-yemanjar-small.jpg (accessed on 25 September 2022).
  25. Missaopesca Como Chegar a Barcelos de Barco. Available online: https://www.missaopesca.com.br/blog/como-chegar-a-barcelos-de-barco/ (accessed on 9 December 2022).
  26. SEFAZ DECRETO N° 42.330, DE 28 DE MAIO DE 2020; Publicado No DOE de 28.5.2020, Poder Executivo, Governo Do Estado Do Amazonas: 2020; p. 4. (In Portuguese). Available online: https://online.sefaz.am.gov.br/silt/Normas/Legisla%E7%E3o%20Estadual/Decreto%20Estadual/Ano%202020/DE%2042.330_20.htm (accessed on 13 March 2023).
  27. Mizumoto, K.; Chowell, G. Transmission Potential of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Onboard the Diamond Princess Cruises Ship, 2020. Infect. Dis. Model. 2020, 5, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mizumoto, K.; Kagaya, K.; Zarebski, A.; Chowell, G. Estimating the Asymptomatic Proportion of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Cases on Board the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Eurosurveillance 2020, 25, 2000180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Nakazawa, E.; Ino, H.; Akabayashi, A. Chronology of COVID-19 Cases on the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship and Ethical Considerations: A Report from Japan. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2020, 14, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rocklöv, J.; Sjödin, H.; Wilder-Smith, A. COVID-19 Outbreak on the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship: Estimating the Epidemic Potential and Effectiveness of Public Health Countermeasures. J. Travel Med. 2020, 27, taaa030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Codreanu, T.A.; Ngeh, S.; Trewin, A.; Armstrong, P.K. Successful Control of an Onboard COVID-19 Outbreak Using the Cruise Ship as a Quarantine Facility, Western Australia, Australia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jerome, C.; Howard, L.A.; Uzel, E.; Androulidakis, J.R. Rapid First-Stage Tests of on-Ship Infection. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 2017, 16, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, L.; Hetharia, W.; Grech La Rosa, A.; Riyadi, S.; Setyawan, D.; Pria Utama, I.; Thomas, G. Computational Study on the Potential Transmission of COVID-19 Virus on an Indonesian Fishing Vessel; PRADS (Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures): Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, L.; Riyadi, S.; Utama, I.; Li, M.; Sun, P.; Thomas, G. COVID-19 Transmission inside a Small Passenger Vessel: Risks and Mitigation. Ocean Eng. 2022, 255, 111486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ng, K.Y.; Codreanu, T.A.; Gui, M.M.; Biglarbeigi, P.; Finlay, D.; McLaughlin, J. Development of a Mathematical Model to Predict the Health Impact and Duration of SARS-CoV-2 Outbreaks on Board Cargo Vessels. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 2022, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, L.; Hetharia, W.; Rosa, A.G.L.; Tavakoli, S.; Khojasteh, D.; Li, M.; Riyadi, S.; Setyawan, D.; Utama, I.K.A.P.; Thomas, G. Offshore COVID-19 Risk Assessment Based on a Fishing Vessel. Ocean Eng. 2023, 285, 115408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hernández-Fontes, J.V.; Maia, H.W.S.; Chávez, V.; Silva, R. Toward More Sustainable River Transportation in Remote Regions of the Amazon, Brazil. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Neto, E.; Fontes, J.; Maia, H. Estruturas Flutuantes Como Alternativas de Aproveitamento de Energia Renovável Na Região Amazônica. In Terra Do Mar Doce: Contribuições da Acaemia Para a Navegação Na Amazônia; Editora Científica Digital: Guarujá, Brazil, 2023; Volume 2, pp. 63–82. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The Brazilian Amazon region, including the name of states (black letters) and their capitals (color circles) [5]. Figure used under a CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Figure 1. The Brazilian Amazon region, including the name of states (black letters) and their capitals (color circles) [5]. Figure used under a CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Covid 03 00077 g001
Figure 3. (a) Examples of expresso vessels on the port of Manaus. (b) Typical interior arrangement of the Expresso. Credits: Daniel Bitencourtt (2022).
Figure 3. (a) Examples of expresso vessels on the port of Manaus. (b) Typical interior arrangement of the Expresso. Credits: Daniel Bitencourtt (2022).
Covid 03 00077 g003
Figure 4. (ac) Typical ferryboats that operate in the Amazon region. (d) Typical main deck of a ferryboat. Credits: (a) [20]; (bd) Harlysson Maia (2022).
Figure 4. (ac) Typical ferryboats that operate in the Amazon region. (d) Typical main deck of a ferryboat. Credits: (a) [20]; (bd) Harlysson Maia (2022).
Covid 03 00077 g004
Figure 5. (a) Area reserved for hammocks in an upper deck of a gaiola boat (wood). (b) Area reserved for hammocks in an upper deck of a gaiola vessel (steel). (c) Common arrangement of a cabin in a gaiola boat. (d) Sign in the passenger terminal before the boarding area. It reads “Do not litter the river/Do not enter without a mask”. Credits: (a,b,d) Daniel Bitencourtt (2022); (c) Adapted from [24].
Figure 5. (a) Area reserved for hammocks in an upper deck of a gaiola boat (wood). (b) Area reserved for hammocks in an upper deck of a gaiola vessel (steel). (c) Common arrangement of a cabin in a gaiola boat. (d) Sign in the passenger terminal before the boarding area. It reads “Do not litter the river/Do not enter without a mask”. Credits: (a,b,d) Daniel Bitencourtt (2022); (c) Adapted from [24].
Covid 03 00077 g005
Figure 6. Interior expresso arrangement with some passengers. Adapted from [25].
Figure 6. Interior expresso arrangement with some passengers. Adapted from [25].
Covid 03 00077 g006
Figure 7. Passenger area with seats in a ferryboat. Credits: Harlysson Maia (2021).
Figure 7. Passenger area with seats in a ferryboat. Credits: Harlysson Maia (2021).
Covid 03 00077 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maia, H.W.S.; Fontes, J.V.H.; Bitencourtt, D.S.; Mendoza, E.; Silva, R.; Hernández, I.D.; Almeida, H.R. COVID Pandemics and Inland Transportation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Note on the Risks of Infection in Typical Passenger Vessels. COVID 2023, 3, 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3080077

AMA Style

Maia HWS, Fontes JVH, Bitencourtt DS, Mendoza E, Silva R, Hernández ID, Almeida HR. COVID Pandemics and Inland Transportation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Note on the Risks of Infection in Typical Passenger Vessels. COVID. 2023; 3(8):1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3080077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maia, Harlysson W. S., Jassiel V. H. Fontes, Daniel Silva Bitencourtt, Edgar Mendoza, Rodolfo Silva, Irving D. Hernández, and Hector Reis Almeida. 2023. "COVID Pandemics and Inland Transportation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Note on the Risks of Infection in Typical Passenger Vessels" COVID 3, no. 8: 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3080077

APA Style

Maia, H. W. S., Fontes, J. V. H., Bitencourtt, D. S., Mendoza, E., Silva, R., Hernández, I. D., & Almeida, H. R. (2023). COVID Pandemics and Inland Transportation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Note on the Risks of Infection in Typical Passenger Vessels. COVID, 3(8), 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3080077

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop