Next Article in Journal
Biocontrol of Grapevine Crown Gall Performed Using Allorhizobium vitis Strain ARK-1
Next Article in Special Issue
Screening of Rhizobacterial Isolates from Apple Rhizosphere for Their Biocontrol and Plant Growth Promotion Activity
Previous Article in Journal
The Development of a Real-Time PCR Assay for Specific Detection of the NISKHI Sheep Pox Vaccine Virus Strain DNA
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Phosphorus Recycling, Biocontrol, and Growth Promotion Capabilities of Soil Bacterial Isolates from Mexican Oak Forests: An Alternative to Reduce the Use of Agrochemicals in Maize Cultivation

Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 2(4), 965-980; https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol2040074
by Rocío Hernández-León 1, Antonio González-Rodríguez 1 and Yunuen Tapia-Torres 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 2(4), 965-980; https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol2040074
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 8 November 2022 / Accepted: 11 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Microbiology of Foods, 2nd Edition)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Line 14, “P sources” should be “phosphorus sources”.

Line 187, “de” should be “the”?

In Figure 1: The representative plates are shown. Could the authors include the strain information for each plate? It would be better to show the control plates in parallel with representative plates.

In Table 1: (1) Should be 16S rRNA gene; (2) Could the authors explain “-” for Siderphores production? Does it mean “undetectable” or “no production”?

Line 264, “completely” should be changed to another word, e.g., dramatically

Line 268, “cinereal” should be “cinerea”.

For table 1: Could the authors explain why the “indole production” analysis was shown in this table?  Is the indole production associated with growth inhibition of fugus?

In Figure 3-7, what is the meaning of “BC, C, ABC..” above the plot? Please further describe the statistical analysis, the meaning of A, B, C,  p value in the figure legend.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is interesting, but the experimental part needs to be refined.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper can be accepted in this form.

Author Response

Thank you 

Back to TopTop