Harnessing Excited-State Iminium Form in 1,5-Diaminonaphthalene for Rapid Water Detection in Organic Solvents

Abstract

Accurate detection of water in organic solvents is essential for various industrial and analytical applications. In this study, we present a simple, rapid, and sensitive fluorescence-based method for water quantification using 1,5-diaminonaphthalene (1,5-DAN) as a solvatochromic probe. This method exploits the excited-state intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) behavior of 1,5-DAN, which undergoes a symmetry-breaking transition in the presence of protic solvents such as water, leading to a distinct redshift in its emission spectrum and a change from a structured double-band to a single ICT band. We demonstrate that, in solvents like acetonitrile and tetrahydrofuran, the emission maxima of 1,5-DAN correlate linearly with water content up to 100%, while ratiometric analysis of peak intensities allows for sensitive detection in low concentration ranges. This method achieved limits of detection as low as 0.08% (v/v) in MeCN, with high reproducibility and minimal sample preparation. Application to a real MeCN–water azeotrope confirms the method’s accuracy, matching classical refractometric measurements. Our findings highlight the potential of 1,5-DAN as a low-cost, efficient, and non-destructive fluorescent sensor for monitoring moisture in organic solvents, offering a practical alternative to conventional methods such as Karl Fischer titration for both bulk and trace water analysis.

1. Introduction

Accurate water content determination is vital for ensuring product quality and process efficiency in the chemical industry [1]. The presence of water in organic solvents can lead to catalyst poisoning [2], undesired side reactions [3], shifts in chemical equilibria [3], and can significantly influence corrosion rates [4]. Moreover, accurate on-line measurement of moisture in industrial solvents is crucial for solvent recovery, as it enhances the efficiency and economy of continuous distillation columns [5]. Various analytical methods have been developed to accurately measure water content in different chemical matrices, each with its advantages and limitations. The Karl Fischer (KF) titration is the preferred method for industrial quality control, capable of measuring water content in solid, liquid, and gaseous samples across a wide range, from a few ppm to 100% [6]. Although being the most widely used and highly accurate method, it requires larger sample sizes and can be destructive [7]. Its limitations include its inability for use in continuous analysis and its requirement for specific (costly) reagents and equipment [8]. Besides KF titration, other methods include the following: rapid Ambient Mass Spectrometry [9], capable of detecting water over a wide concentration range from 10 ppm to 99%; Cathodic Stripping Voltammetry (CSV) [10], based on electrooxidation of a gold electrode; Gas Chromatography (GC) [7], a versatile and small-sample-size-requiring method; and Infrared Spectroscopy (IR) for trace water analysis, utilizing the water fundamental at 2.8 μm [11]. For continuous monitoring in various organic solvents, optical sensors, categorized into spectrophotometry and spectrofluorimetry, are favored for their simplicity, low cost, and minimal need for complex equipment [8]. Fluorescent probes have emerged as effective tools for determining water content in organic solvents, leveraging various mechanisms to achieve high sensitivity and specificity. Recent studies have highlighted several innovative approaches, including carbon quantum dots (CQDs) and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which demonstrate promising results in detecting trace water levels across different solvents. Nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots (Y-CDs and R-CDs) exhibit significant fluorescence-quenching in the presence of water, with detection limits as low as 0.056% in solvents like acetone and DMF [12]: Another study reported carbon quantum dots with a detection limit of 0.01% in solvents such as ethanol and THF [13]. A novel MOF (SNNU-301) utilizes Excited-State Intramolecular Proton Transfer (ESIPT) for a turn-on fluorescence response, achieving detection limits of 0.011% in dimethyl sulfoxide [14]. BODIPY dyes [15] are also effective fluorescent probes for detecting substances in water, including trace water itself, via photoinduced electron transfer (PeT), which causes fluorescence changes upon analyte binding. For acetonitrile, the detection limit is 0.3 wt%, as reported by Ooyama et al. [15]. Owing to their simple structure and easy preparation, naphthalene-based 1,8-naphthalimide probes have emerged as effective tools for detecting water content in organic solvents due to their unique fluorescent properties. These probes leverage the interaction between solvent polarity and fluorescence intensity, allowing for precise measurements of water concentration. N-amino-4-(2-hydroxyethylamino)-1,8-naphthalimide (AHN) shows a linear decrease in fluorescence intensity with increasing water concentration in organic solvents with detection limits of 0.019%, 0.038%, and 0.060% for dioxane, acetonitrile, and ethanol, respectively [16]. A highly water-soluble naphthalimide probe has been developed for solid-state applications, allowing for the detection of acid/base vapors and water content in a more versatile manner [17]. Ones of the simplest naphthalene-based fluorescent probes are symmetric, quite small-molecular-weight diaminonaphthalenes, namely 1,5- and 1,8-diaminonaphtalenes (1,5-DAN and 1,8-DAN, respectively). DANs are important precursors of smart fluorescent dyes and polymers.

During our preliminary studies, we were surprised to find that both 1,5- and 1,8-DAN exhibited real solvatochromic behavior [18]. We propose an aromatic quasi-iminium ion (Ar = NH₂⁺)-based excited state form for the transformation of the originally symmetrical structure in ground state (S₀) to a non-symmetrical excited state (S₁), where intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) happens between two non-equivalent NH₂ groups (Figure 1). The emission spectra of 1,5-DAN show significant differences in non-protic and protic solvents. In non-protic solvents, 1,5-DAN contains structured (double) bands, whereas in protic solvents, there is only a broad band in the spectrum, which may be explained by the stabilization of the iminium form in protic solvents by H-bonds. For 1,8-DAN, only one band is present in all solvents. A redshift is observed in the emission maxima of both symmetric diamines as the proton donor properties of the solvent increase. The observed bathochromic shifts are almost exactly 40 nm in both cases: λ_Em = 367–406 nm (1.5-DAN) and λ_Em = 398–439 nm (1.8-DAN) [18]. We speculated whether these changes in the emission spectrum could be utilized for the detection of protic moieties, i.e., water in aprotic solvents.

Herein, we report the first application of the simple 1,5-diaminonaphthalene for the detection of both large and trace amounts of water in aprotic solvents, such as acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and dimethylsulfoxide, based on the redshift and transition from a double-peak to a single ICT band in the emission spectra.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Determination of Water Content of Solvent Mixtures in the Range of 0–100%

It is clear from the results presented in Figure 1 that, for 1,5-DAN, the redshift of the emission maxima can be used to determine the polarity of the medium. Since the polarity of water (ε_r = 80.1) is the highest among the commonly used solvents, we assume that the composition of the organic solvent–water mixture can be determined from the position of the emission maxima. To test this assumption, commonly used aprotic organic solvents, such as acetonitrile (MeCN), tetrahydrofuran (THF), and dioxane and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), were chosen that are well-miscible with water. Consequently, aqueous mixtures in the range of 0–100% were prepared in 10% steps (

Table 1. Percentage by volume composition of the organic solvent–water mixtures used in the experiment and the emission maxima of 1,5-DAN measured in them.

	Water Content (v/v)
	0%	10%	20%	30%	40%	50%	60%	70%	80%	90%	100%
Solvent	Emission Maximum (nm)
MeCN	377	379	381	383	386	388	393	397	400	403	405
THF	378	381	382	382	383	384	388	392	399	402	405
Dioxane	377	379	380	382	383	386	391	395	399	402	404
DMSO	386	386	386	387	387	389	392	396	400	402	403

). Emission spectra were recorded at the respective absorption maximum of 1,5-DAN in the solvents, λ_ex = 333 nm (MeCN), λ_ex = 333 (Dioxane), λ_ex = 344 nm (THF), λ_ex = 341 nm (DMSO), and the results are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 2. The original spectra and that of DMSO are presented in Figures S1–S8 in the Supporting Information. Since fluorescent intensity decreases with increasing water content, for better visualization, normalized spectra are compared in Figure 2.

It is evident from Figure 2 and Figures S1–S8 that in all of the four solvents studied, the emission maximum is redshifted by the increasing water content. Similarly, in all four solvents, a double-peaked band structure is observed in anhydrous medium, indicating the presence of the symmetric excited form of 1,5-DAN, where both NH₂ groups are sp³ hybridized (Figure 1B and Figure 2A). In acetonitrile, the double-peaked structure disappears at about 20% water content (Figure 2A), whereas in THF (Figure 2B) and dioxane (Figure 2C), the higher energy peak (at 364 nm) can be identified as up to 50% water, as a shoulder. The observed solvatochromic shift in fluorescence upon water addition arises from an increase in medium polarity and hydrogen-bond donor capacity. The excited-state intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) in 1,5-DAN is more strongly stabilized in polar protic environments, leading to a redshift in emission. This effect is particularly pronounced in water-containing aprotic solvents, where specific hydrogen bonding interactions with the amino groups of DAN further stabilize the emissive state. A significant difference can be observed in DMSO (Figures S7 and S8), where between 0 and 50% water content the position of the emission maximum is virtually unchanged; only the shape of the peak changes. To visualize the variation, the emission peak maximum is plotted as a function of water content (Figure 3). Here again, the different behavior of DMSO is immediately striking. This can be explained by the fact that DMSO can form strong hydrogen bonds with water molecules [19], so that, at low water content, the water molecules compete with the H-bond donation between DMSO and the sp³ NH₂ group of the asymmetrical excited 1,5-DAN (Figure 1C). Similarly, THF and dioxane are also able to accept H-bonding from water molecules, but much weaker than those in the case of DMSO. The lower H-bond-accepting ability is clearly observed in the sigmoidal slope of the curves. A near-linear correlation is observed only for acetonitrile, which is not involved in H-bond formation, so that all of the added water helps to stabilize the asymmetric iminium ion-containing form.

The values measured in acetonitrile are also plotted separately and were subjected to regression analysis using OriginPro 2018 (SR1, b9.5.1.195) software (Figure 3B). It is clearly seen that the emission maxima fall on a straight line, with an adjusted coefficient of determination close to a value of one: R²_adj = 0.999.

2.2. Testing the Method on MeCN-Water Azeotrope as Real Sample

Acetonitrile is employed as a key solvent in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) applications [20]. The bulk of the mobile phase is water, usually 70–80% (v/v), and the recovery of acetonitrile is carried out by distillation. However, owing to the azeotropic phenomenon, acetonitrile cannot be separated from its aqueous solution using a conventional rectification method [21]. The composition of the azeotropic mixture [21] at 1 atm is 69.71% (n/n) MeCN and 30.29% (n/n) H₂O, which corresponds to 84.0% (m/m) MeCN and 16.0% (m/m) H₂O. Fluorometry offers a quick and efficient way to determine the water content in the distilled acetonitrile. To check the applicability of our method, 1,5-DAN was added to freshly distilled MeCN–water distillate close to the azeotropic composition, was measured three times, and the results are presented in Figure 4.

It can be seen from Figure 4A that the emission spectra of the three independent measurements for the near-azeotropic distillate perfectly overlap, indicating the reproducibility of the method. It is also evident that the emission peak of the distillate is located between the previously measured 10% and 20% (v/v) water containing MeCN samples, closer to the 20%. The emission maximum was λ_{em, max} = 380.48 ± 0.06 nm. Using the recalculated calibration curve to mass percent in Figure 4B y = 374.36 + 0.297 × %_water, the water content of our sample was determined to be 20.6% (m/m), as indicated by dashed lines in Figure 4B. The refractive index of the mixture was n_D,20 = 1.3463, and its density was 0.808 ± 0.001 g/cm³. A 20% (m/m) water-containing MeCN sample was freshly prepared by mixing 1.00 mL water and 5.10 mL MeCN. Its refractive index was measured exactly as n_D,20 = 1.3463. This indicates the usability of the method for the determination of the water content of aqueous acetonitrile, such as that obtained after azeotropic distillation. The accuracy of the method is approximately 1%.

2.3. Determination of Water Content of Solvent Mixtures in the Low Concentration Range

The change in the shape of the emission peaks, i.e., the decrease in the intensity of the high-energy peak at λ_em = 364 nm (shoulder), opens the possibility of detecting/determining small amounts of H-donor moieties, e.g., water. To develop an analytical method, fluorescence titration experiments were carried out where water was added in 10 µL increments to 3.00 mL of 1,5-DAN solution in the corresponding dry (H₂O < 30 ppm) solvent. First, the spectrum of the pure solvent was recorded to exclude contaminants that might affect the peak shape. None of the solvents contained fluorescent contaminants. The water titration results in acetonitrile and THF are summarized in Figure 5.

As expected, even after the addition of small amounts of water, the intensity of the higher energy shoulder at λ_em = 364 nm (belonging to the symmetrically excited state, Figure 1B) decreased, while an increase in intensity was observed at higher wavelengths (belonging to the asymmetrically excited state, Figure 1C). To better visualize the changes, normalized spectra were used, since the addition of water causes dilution and, thus, intensity changes. The normalized spectra better show the change in the peak shape, which indicates the disappearance of the symmetric excited structure and the appearance of the asymmetric water-stabilized iminium form. Since both a simultaneous decrease and increase in intensity can be observed in the spectra, it is worthwhile to reduce the quantitative analytical method to a ratiometric one, as this allows for the method to be independent of external factors, such as dye concentration and temperature. In order to decide which wavelength ratio to take into account, an optimization was carried out, as seen in Figure 6.

It is evident from Figure 6 that the longer the wavelengths, the higher the slope of the intensity ratios, i.e., the sensitivity of the method depends strongly on the wavelengths chosen. After careful evaluation, the 364/440 nm pair was chosen for further investigation. As shown in Figure 5C, for acetonitrile, I₃₆₄/I₄₄₀ gives an almost perfectly straight line as a function of water concentration in the range 0.00–1.79 M, where the coefficient of determination is close to 1 (R² = 0.998), demonstrating the analytical applicability of the method. The equation of the calibrating line is y = −1.66x + 11.8—that is, one unit change in the intensity ratio corresponds to 0.60 M water (approximately 1% v/v). In total, 10 µL of water corresponds to 0.3% v/v, for a total volume of 3.00 mL. Above 1.79 M water concentration, the linearity is no longer valid, most probably due to the redshift in the emission with increasing water content, as is presented previously in Figure 2. Repeating the experiment in tetrahydrofuran shows similar results as those obtained from acetonitrile. The slope of the calibration line (m = −1.75) is within 10% of that in acetonitrile (m = −1.66), illustrating the applicability of the method in other solvents.

2.4. Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantification of the Method

To evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of the method, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) investigations were carried out. LOD and LOQ were calculated as LOD = 3σ and LOQ = 10σ, where σ represents the standard deviation of the blank (1,5-DAN measured ten times). For the calculations, the calibration curves in Figure 5C,D were used; the background spectra and detailed LOD and LOQ calculations for MeCN and THF are provided in the Supporting Information in Figures S9 and S10. The summarized data are presented in

Table 2. The limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ), the equation of the calibration curve, and coefficient of determination (R²) for H₂O detection method in different solvents. % stands for percentage by volume.

Solvent	Equation of Calibrating Line	LOD [M]	LOD [%]	LOQ [M]	LOQ [%]	R2
MeCN	y = −1.66x + 11.8	0.047	0.08	0.156	0.24	0.998
THF	y = −1.75x + 12.3	0.076	0.13	0.229	0.40	0.98

.

Of the two solvents investigated MeCN gave the lower LOD value of 0.047 M H₂O, which corresponds to 0.08% (v/v). The method also demonstrated relatively high sensitivity in THF, with an LOD of 0.047 M water—that is, 0.13% (v/v). From the results, it is evident that we can go down to a water content of about 0.1%, which should be sufficient for most practical applications.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

1,5-DAN: 1,5-diaminonaphthalene (CAS: 2243-62-1, MW: 158.2 g/mol, Source: Acros organics, Cat: 112290250).

• Solvents

The main criterion for the selection of solvents was low water content (maximum 30–50 ppm), so the moisture content of the solvents remained below the detection limit of the method. Acetonitrile (MeCN, VWR Chemicals, HPLC grade, H₂O < 30 ppm), tetrahydrofuran (THF, anhydrous, Sigma-Aldrich, H₂O < 0.002%), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, HPLC grade, VWR, Germany, H₂O < 0.1%), and 1,4-dioxane (LiCrosolv^®, HPLC grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, H₂O < 0.02%) were used without further purification. However, fluorescence spectra were recorded for each pure solvent to check their purity. For water content measurements, deionized water R = 18 MΩ was used.

3.2. Methods

• Fluorimetry

The excitation and emission spectra were recorded on a Jasco FP-8550 Spectrofluorometer (Jasco Inc., Budapest, Hungary) at 20 °C, with an excitation and emission bandwidth of 2.5 nm and a scan rate of 200 nm/min. The previously determined absorption maxima were chosen as excitation wavelengths (λ_ex = 333 nm in MeCN and dioxane, λ_ex = 344 nm in THF, λ_ex = 341 nm in DMSO). The absorbance at the excitation wavelength was kept below A = 0.1 to avoid self-absorption. First, the spectrum of the pure solvent was recorded to exclude contaminants that might affect the peak shape. Raw spectra were evaluated using Spectragryph (v1.2.16.1.) and OriginPro 2018 (SR1, b9.5.1.195) software.

• Bulk water determination

For the investigation of solvent water mixtures, the following compositions were prepared, as shown in

Table 3. The volumes of the solvent (MeCN, dioxane, THF, DMSO) and deionized water measured to the cuvette and the resulting composition in % (v/v).

	Water Content (v/v)
	0%	10%	20%	30%	40%	50%	60%	70%	80%	90%	100%
Solvent (µL)	3000	2700	2400	2100	1800	1500	1200	900	600	300	0
Water (µL)	0	300	600	900	1200	1500	1800	2100	2400	2700	3000

.

To the mixtures, 10 µL of 1,5-DAN stock solution at a concentration of 3.12 mM (in MeCN) was added, and the emission spectra were recorded. The mass fraction of water (% m/m) in acetonitrile–water mixtures, as used in the construction of Figure 4, was calculated using the following equation:

$${\displaystyle \frac{V_{water}·{\rho }_{water}}{{V_{water}·{\rho }_{water}+V}_{MeCN}·{\rho }_{MeCN}}}$$

(1)

where V_water and V_MeCN are the volumes of water and acetonitrile in cm³ taken from Table 3, while ρ_water = 0.998 g/cm³ and ρ_MeCN = 0.786 g/cm³ are the respective densities at 20 °C, respectively.

3.2.1. Low Water Content Determination

In total, 10 µL of 1,5-DAN stock solution at a concentration of 3.12 mM (in MeCN) was added to 2990 µL MeCN, and the emission spectrum was recorded. This sample corresponds to the sample containing 0 M water. Consequently, deionized water was added to the sample at 10 µL between 0 and 100 µL and 20 µL between 100 and 200 µL. After each addition, the sample was homogenized by shaking in a stoppered cuvette, and the bubbles formed were allowed to leave the solution, and then the fluorescence spectrum was recorded. For each solvent, triplicates were measured. The composition of the samples is presented in

Table 4. The amount of deionized water added to the 3000 µL 1,5-DAN in MeCN solution; the resulting H₂O concentrations and percentage by volume %(v/v). The volume change was taken into consideration when calculating the final water concentration.

Polluting Solvent (H2O)
Quantity Added (µL)	Concentration H2O (mol/dm3)	% (v/v) H2O
0	0.0000	0.00
10	0.1846	0.33
20	0.3679	0.66
30	0.5501	0.99
40	0.7310	1.32
50	0.9107	1.64
60	1.0893	1.96
70	1.2667	2.28
80	1.4430	2.60
90	1.6181	2.91
100	1.7921	3.23
120	2.1368	3.85
140	2.4770	4.46
160	2.8129	5.06
180	3.1447	5.66
200	3.4722	6.25

.

% (v/v) and water concentration were calculated according to Equations (2) and (3):

$$\%\left({\displaystyle \frac{v}{v}}\right),water={\displaystyle \frac{V_{water}}{3000+V_{water}}}·100$$

(2)

where V_water is the volume of added water in µL from Table 4 and 3000 is the volume of the original solution in µL.

$$\left[{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\right]={\displaystyle \frac{(V_{water}·{\rho }_{water})/M_{water}}{(3000+V_{water})/{10}^3}}$$

(3)

where M_water = 18.0 g/mol is the molecular weight of water.

3.2.2. Acetonitrile–Water Distillate

The refractive index of the MeCN-H₂O distillate was measured using an Anton Paar Abbemat 3200 refractometer at 20 °C. The density of the distillate was determined in a 25 cm³ picnometer at 20 °C. The average of 3 measurements was taken as the final value.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we introduce a simple yet highly effective fluorometric method for detecting water content in aprotic organic solvents using 1,5-diaminonaphthalene (1,5-DAN) as a fluorescent probe. Our results demonstrate that the solvatochromic shift in the emission spectrum of 1,5-DAN, driven by the formation of an excited-state iminium form stabilized by protic solvents, provides a sensitive and reproducible means of quantifying water concentration. We observe a clear redshift in emission maxima and a characteristic peak transition from a double-structured to a single ICT band upon increasing water content. The method proved linear, accurate, and highly sensitive, down to approximately 0.1% v/v water, with a limit of detection of 0.08% in acetonitrile and 0.13% in THF. Furthermore, its applicability was confirmed on a real azeotropic MeCN–water distillate, showing strong agreement with reference refractometry and density-based data. By employing ratiometric fluorescence measurements, we enhanced both the precision and robustness of the detection, making the method less susceptible to variations in dye concentration or external conditions. Due to its simplicity, low material requirement, and lack of a need for specialized instrumentation, this method holds strong potential for integration into industrial process monitoring, solvent purification, and quality-control applications where rapid and accurate moisture determination is essential.