Next Article in Journal
Biological and Conservation Aspects of Otter Mortality: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Recolonisation of the Piketberg Leopard Population: A Model for Human–Wildlife Coexistence in a Changing Landscape
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Predicting Community Participation in Passive Pest Surveillance

1
Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
2
UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Conservation 2024, 4(2), 288-306; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4020019
Submission received: 22 February 2024 / Revised: 29 April 2024 / Accepted: 20 May 2024 / Published: 28 May 2024

Abstract

Predicting the willingness of people to engage in passive surveillance is crucial to the success of community-based efforts to manage invasive species and conserve native biodiversity. We draw on the marketing concept of involvement, which reflects the personal importance of an issue or behaviour, to understand and measure the motivation of members of the public to engage in passive surveillance. The usefulness of this concept was tested by analysing the responses of householders to surveys about their willingness to engage in passive surveillance for a purely environmental pest, Red-eared Slider Turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans), and their willingness to engage in passive surveillance for an economic and environmental pest, Argentine Ants (Linepithema humile), in New Zealand. We found that involvement influenced intentions, attitudes and surveillance behaviour for both invasive pests. We discussed the implications of these findings for (i) choosing between a surveillance strategy based on recruiting and training highly motivated members of the public and a strategy based on passive surveillance by any member of the public; (ii) growing the potential for passive surveillance by either increasing involvement with preventing the spread of a pest or increasing involvement with surveillance activities themselves; and (iii) determining the importance of convenient reporting mechanisms in promoting consistent reporting.
Keywords: pest monitoring; passive surveillance; conservation; motivation; community; New Zealand pest monitoring; passive surveillance; conservation; motivation; community; New Zealand

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaine, G.; Wright, V.; Mason, N.W.H. Predicting Community Participation in Passive Pest Surveillance. Conservation 2024, 4, 288-306. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4020019

AMA Style

Kaine G, Wright V, Mason NWH. Predicting Community Participation in Passive Pest Surveillance. Conservation. 2024; 4(2):288-306. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4020019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaine, Geoff, Vic Wright, and Norman W. H. Mason. 2024. "Predicting Community Participation in Passive Pest Surveillance" Conservation 4, no. 2: 288-306. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4020019

APA Style

Kaine, G., Wright, V., & Mason, N. W. H. (2024). Predicting Community Participation in Passive Pest Surveillance. Conservation, 4(2), 288-306. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4020019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop