Next Article in Journal
Taxonomy, Taxa Richness, and Distribution of the Tribes Astragaleae, Crotalarieae, Genisteae, Indigofereae, and Loteae (Fabaceae) in Northeastern Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Morphology and Generic Classification of Catfishes of the Trichomycterus Lineage (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Species of Marasmius Sect. Globulares Growing in Grassland from Japan †

1
Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
2
Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba 305-0005, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Taxonomy 2026, 6(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy6010021
Submission received: 10 February 2026 / Revised: 5 March 2026 / Accepted: 5 March 2026 / Published: 11 March 2026

Abstract

Marasmius neooreades sp. nov. from Japan is described. This species produces fleshy, medium-sized basidiomata that are macromorphologically similar to M. oreades, with a pileus ranging from wheat-colored to dark brown and a tough stipe covered with brownish tomentose squamules. The gill edges bear cheilocystidia that are clavate to diverticulate. The pileipellis is hymeniform and composed of Globulares-type elements containing brown pigments. The species typically occurs gregariously in grasslands and occasionally forms fairy rings. Phylogenetic analyses based on ITS and LSU sequences indicated that M. neooreades forms a well-supported, independent clade distinct from previously described species of Marasmius. In addition, a combination of morphological characters clearly differentiates this species from all described taxa. An illustrated description and the phylogenetic placement of the new species are provided.

1. Introduction

Marasmius Fr., typified by Marasmius rotula (Scop.) Fr., is the type genus of the family Marasmiaceae Roze ex Kühner [1]. The genus is distributed on all continents except Antarctica and is particularly diverse in tropical regions [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Approximately 700 species are currently recognized worldwide [14]. Most species are saprotrophic, typically inhabiting woody debris or litter in forested environments, although some also occur on soil in grasslands [12]. Members of the genus are not known to form ectomycorrhizae [3]. Several species, such as M. oreades (Bolton) Fr. and M. heinemannianus Antonín, are edible and are traded in European and African markets, respectively [15,16]. Notably, M. oreades is also recognized as a turfgrass pathogen and is considered economically important [17,18,19].
Marasmius sect. Globulares Kühner is characterized by medium- to large-sized tough basidiomata, often with a hygrophanous and ± sulcate pileus. The gills are spaced from distant to crowded and lack a collarium. The pileipellis is usually hymeniform, composed of smooth, non-diverticulate elements, although short branches may be present in some species (e.g., in M. oreades) [20,21]. Basidiospores produce a white spore print and are smooth and ellipsoid to clavate; the hymenial trama is dextrinoid. Ecologically, species of this section are non-ectomycorrhizal and primarily occur on litter or soil in forested or grassland habitats, although some are known to be plant pathogens [18,19]. Phylogenetic studies based on LSU, SSU, ITS, rpb2, and ef1-α markers have demonstrated that Marasmius is a complex and polyphyletic genus [22,23]. Furthermore, morphological and molecular studies of Marasmius sect. Globulares sensu Singer have revealed that species assigned to this section are intermixed across traditional sectional boundaries, leading to the proposal of further taxonomic subdivisions and further taxonomic subdivisions have since been proposed [6,23,24,25].
In Japan, seven species of sect. Globulares have been reported: M. aurantioferrugineus Hongo, M. brunneospermus Har. Takah., M. macrocystidiosus Kiyashko & E.F. Malysheva, M. maximus Hongo, M. nivicola Har. Takah., M. oreades, and M. purpureostriatus Hongo. Except for M. oreades and M. macrocystidiosus, all were originally described from Japan [8,9,26,27,28,29]. While M. oreades typically occurs in turf habitats, the remaining Japanese species are mainly associated with forest environments. Nevertheless, several species of this section elsewhere in the world, such as M. albogriseus (Peck) Singer, M. heinemannianus, M. oreades, M. campestris N.K. Zeng, Zhi Q. Liang & M.S. Su, M. collinus (Scopoli) Singer, and M. pseudocollinus (Singer & Digilio ex Singer) Singer, are known to occur in turf habitats.
During surveys conducted in the Honshu region of Japan, we collected specimens of Marasmius sect. Globulares from turf environments. Detailed morphological examinations and molecular analyses revealed that these collections represent an undescribed taxon, distinguishable from known species by a unique combination of morphological characters and distinct DNA sequences. In this study, we describe this new species based on macro- and micromorphological observations in conjunction with molecular phylogenetic analyses. This study contributes to a better understanding of turf-inhabiting species of Marasmius sect. Globulares in East Asia.

2. Materials and Methods

Fresh basidiomata were photographed in situ with their surrounding habitat using a compact digital camera (TG-6, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Macromorphological features were examined shortly after collection in the laboratory. Color descriptions follow the color standards of Kornerup and Wanscher [30], under ambient room light, using notations such as “orange white (5A2)” and “greyish orange (5B3–4)”. After macroscopic observations, specimens were dried for 48 h at 45 °C using a food dehydrator and preserved as dried vouchers for subsequent microscopic molecular analyses.
Microscopic features were examined from the dried specimens, with particular attention to basidiospore colors and dimensions, the morphology of hymenial cystidia, and the structure of the pileus. All tissues were mounted in 3% aqueous potassium hydroxide (KOH); Cotton Blue or Melzer’s reagent was applied as needed to enhance the visibility of specific structures. Spore measurements are expressed as (Lmin–) L5–L95% (–Lmax) × (Wmin–) W5–W95% (–Wmax), where Lmin and Lmax represent the minimum and maximum observed spore lengths and L5% and L95% indicate the 5th and 95th percentiles, respectively. Width measurements follow the same convention. Mean spore length and width (Lave and Wave) and their standard deviations (Lstd and Wstd) were calculated based on measurements of n spores from c specimens. The spore length-to-width ratio (Q) also is given as (Qmin–) Q5–Q95% (–Qmax), with Qave and Qstd representing the mean and standard deviation, respectively. Microscopic observations were conducted using a differential interference contrast microscope (BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Photographs of the microstructures were taken with a digital microscope camera (TS-2500, J-SCOPE, Kawasaki, Japan) and analyzed using Piximètre software (version 5.10) to measure basidiospores, basidia, and other microscopic structures.

2.1. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from specimens using either a microwave-based rapid extraction method [31] or a modified CTAB extraction method [32]. For the microwave-based method, gill tissues were excised dried basidiomata and cut into approximately 1 × 1 mm fragments using fine forceps. The tissue fragments were placed in 0.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes containing 100 µL of 0.1× Tris-EDTA buffer and heated in a turntable-type microwave oven (RE-TX1-W5, Sharp Corporation, Osaka, Japan) at 600 W for 1 min and 10 s. After standing for 30 s, samples were reheated for an additional 1 min and 10 s and then stored at −30 °C until use.
In the modified CTAB method, tissue fragments prepared in the same manner were placed in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes containing 300 µL of 2× CTAB solution. Sample were frozen at −30 °C and thawed at 65 °C; this freeze–thaw cycle was repeated three times. Powdered quartz sand (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) was added, and the tissue was ground using a pestle (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) attached to an electric drill. After grinding, samples were incubated at 65 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, 300 µL of CIA (chloroform : isoamyl alcohol = 24:1) solution was added, and the mixture was homogenized by vortexing. Samples were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 15 min, and 150 µL of the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. An equal volume of isopropanol (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) was added, mixed by vortexing, and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was washed with 1 mL of 70% ethanol (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation), followed by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 3 min. After the removal of residual ethanol, the pellet was dried at 65 °C and resuspended in 50 µL of 0.1× Tris-EDTA buffer. DNA extracts were stored at −30 °C.

2.2. PCR and Sequencing

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using two protocols. In the first protocol, each 25 µL reaction contained 14.375 µL of sterile distilled water, 2.5 µL of PCR buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 2.5 µL each of forward and reverse primers (5 µM), 2.5 µL of dNTP mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.125 µL of polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 0.5 µL of template DNA. Alternatively, PCRs were prepared in 0.2 mL tubes using 3.5 µL of sterile distilled water, 5 µL of EmeraldAmp MAX PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan), 0.25 µL each of forward and reverse primers (10 µM), and 1 µL of template DNA. All reaction mixtures were prepared on ice.
PCR amplification was conducted using either a T100™ Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA) or a Veriti® 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). The ITS region was amplified using primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 [33] or ITS1F [34]/ITS4, and the LSU region using LROR/LR5 [35]. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94–95 °C for 30–35 s, annealing at 51–52 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min (all primer sets). Final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 5–10 min, depending on the primer pair.
PCR products were confirmed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light. Visible DNA bands were either column-purified using a DNA Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or cleaned using ExoSAP-IT (Millipore, Molsheim, France). Sequencing was performed either by a commercial sequence service (FASMAC Co., Ltd., Atsugi, Japan) or using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit on an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

Raw sequence chromatograms were visually inspected using BioEdit ver. 7.2.5 [36], and consensus sequences were assembled by aligning forward and reverse reads using Clustal W v2.1 [37]. Consensus sequences were compared with those deposited in GenBank using BLAST web server (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 10 January 2026) to identify closely related taxa, and representative sequences showing high ITS similarity were selected for inclusion in the phylogenetic analyses. The accession numbers of all sequences used are listed in Table 1.
For concatenated ITS + LSU analyses, individual loci were manually combined in BioEdit, with visual adjustments to ensure alignment accuracy. Multiple sequence alignments of the ITS and ITS + LSU datasets were generated using MUSCLE v3.8 [38], as implemented in MEGA ver. 7.0.26 [39]. Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using the IQ-TREE web server [40]. The best-fit substitution models were selected automatically. For the ITS dataset, the HKY model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity (four rate categories) and empirical state frequencies were applied. For the ITS + LSU dataset, the ITS partition was modeled with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity, whereas the LSU partition assumed a proportion of invariable sites both partitions used the HKY substitution model with empirical state frequencies.
Branch support was assessed by performing ultrafast bootstrap approximation (UFBoot [41]) with 1000 replicates, the SH-aLRT test with 1000 replicates, and the approximate Bayes (aBayes) test. Species of Crinipellis Pat. (JFK84, VPI3355, BRNM 751593) were selected as the outgroup, as this genus forms a sister lineage to Marasmius [4].

3. Results

3.1. Phylogeny

The Japanese specimens examined in this study (TNS F-84727, F-84730, F-84738, F-84756, F-84759, F-84785, F-84794, F-84844) formed a well-supported, independent clade in both the ITS and concatenated ITS + LSU phylogenetic trees (Figure 1 and Figure 2). In the ITS tree, two Chinese specimens labeled as “Marasmius maximus” (B6 and HTBM2533) were nested within this clade.
The Japanese sequences were phylogenetically closely related to M. maximus from China (NS16081406) and Korea (KG 224 and BRNM 714571), M. wynneae Berk. & Broome from Korea (HCCN G86) and M. nivicola from Japan (KPM-NC 0006038) and Korea (BRNM 714574). Together, these taxa formed a larger assemblage corresponding to Series Wynnearum J.S. Oliveira & Moncalvo [25].
Branch support values for the clade representing the Japanese specimens were high in both analyses, indicating strong phylogenetic support for their separation from previously described species of Marasmius.
Furthermore, following Oliveira et al. (2024) [23], we performed an ITS-based phylogenetic analysis with limited taxon sampling, using the sister taxa of section Globulares (M. nigrobrunneus (Pat.) Sacc. NW223 and M. ruforotula Singer BRNM 714674) as the outgroup. The SH-aLRT support values were slightly lower in this analysis, but the overall tree topology was identical to that obtained when Crinipellis was used as the outgroup.

3.2. Taxonomic Treatment

Marasmius neooreades K. Oguchi & K. Hosaka, sp. nov. (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).
MycoBank no.: MB862605.
Diagnosis: Differs from Marasmius oreades in having more slender basidiomata, the presence of cheilocystidia, and a distinct phylogenetic placement based on nuclear ribosomal DNA regions.
Etymology: The epithet “neooreades” refers to the macromorphological resemblance of the basidiomata to Marasmius oreades (Bolton) Fr.
HOLOTYPE: JAPAN: Tottori Prefecture, Tottori University, Koyama-chō-minami, Tottori-shi, 29 June 2023, K. Oguchi (TNS F-84727).
Gene sequences ex-holotype: PX091517 (ITS), PX090884 (LSU).
Basidiomata (Figure 3 and Figure 4A,B) medium-sized, marasmious, fleshy and tough. Pileus 5–30 mm broad, up to 40 mm diam.; convex to plane, finally flattening to slightly upturned, usually with umbo; surface initially glabrous, becoming sulcate or rugulose toward the margin with age; dry to slightly oily when young; hygrophanous in most conditions, especially in mature basidiomata. When moist, pileus brown (6E7-cognac, 6E8-rust brown), becoming brownish orange (6C4-red hired, 6C5-sahara) to light brown (6D5-sunburn, 6D6-cinnamon, 6D7-raw sienna) when dry; when mature pale yellow (4A3-cream) to orange white (5A2-orange white) to pale orange (5A3-pale orange) to grayish orange (5B3–4) or brown (6E7-cognac, 6E8-rust brown, 7E7, 7E8-agate) at the margin when dry, the center light brown (6D5-sunburn, 6D6-cinnamon, 6D7-raw sienna) or brown (6E7-cognac, 6E8-rust brown) when dry, especially tinged dark brown (6F4-chocolate, 6F5-teak, 6F6-burnt umber, 6F7-dark brown chestnut, 6F8-brownish gray, 7F4—5, 7F6-eye brown, 7F7—8, 8F4—5, 8F6-liver, 8F7-caput mortuum, 8F8) when moist. Gills 2–6 mm wide, distant to subdistant, relatively thick; edges smooth, non-marginate, intervenose; color yellowish white (4A2), pale yellow (4A3-cream), orange white (5A2-orange white), pale orange (5A3-pale orange) to grayish orange (5B3); collarium absent. Stipe 30–80 mm long, 1.5–3 mm wide, equal or slightly tapering toward the apex or base; surface squamulose, light brown (6D4-camel, 6D5-sunburn, 6D6-cinnamon, 6D7-raw sienna) to brown (6E5, 6E6-cocoa, 6E7-cognac, 6E8-rust brown) except the apex, the apex showing ground color off-white or yellowish white (4A2) to pale yellow (4A3-cream) to orange white (5A2-orange white); context hollow. Flesh white and tough. Taste and odor indistinct. Spore print white.
Basidiospores (Figure 4C and Figure 5E) (7.2–)8.1–10.7(–11.3) × (4.5–)4.9–6.7(–7.7) µm, mean = 9.6 ± 0.8 × 5.7 ± 0.6 µm, Q = (1.3–)1.4–2(–2.1), Qmean = 1.7 ± 0.2, (specimens = 6, n = 30), ellipsoid, smooth, thin-walled, with a distinct apiculus; oil droplets usually present; hyaline in KOH, inamyloid in Melzer’s reagent. Basidia (Figure 4D) 34–54.4 × 6.3–9.2 µm, mean = 43.3 ± 6.1 × 7.6 ± 0.7 µm, thin-walled, clavate to cylindrical, four-spored or occasionally two-spored, with basal clamp connections, hyaline in KOH, non-amyloid in Melzer’s reagent. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia (Figure 4E and Figure 5A) present, very variable, 6–49 × 4–20 µm, clavate to irregular, sometimes diverticulate; thin-walled, smooth, with clamp connections, hyaline, inamyloid in Melzer’s reagent. Hymenial trama subpararellel to interwoven, composed of hyphae 5–7 µm wide; smooth, with clamp connections, hyaline in KOH, dextrinoid in Melzer’s reagent. Pileipellis (Figure 4F,G and Figure 5B,C) hymeniform, with clamp connections, composed of irregular, clavate to Globulares-type terminal elements, 12–37 × 4–18 µm; walls thin to moderately thickened; Globulares-type elements often with brownish pigment; pileus trama dextrinoid. Stipitipellis (Figure 5D) form cutis, composed of cylindrical hyphae 2–8 µm wide, hyaline to brownish, with clamp connections, sometimes make short branches, faintly encrusted; sometimes forming hyphal mass layer 100(–200) µm wide; caulocystidia (Figure 4H) present, fusiform and somewhat twisted shape, thin-walled, 24–42.4(–63.9) × 3.9–7.4 µm, inamyloid in Melzer’s reagent, stipe trama dextrinoid.

3.3. Additional Collections Examined (Paratypes)

JAPAN: Chiba: Shisui sōgō-kōen, Sumi, Shisui-chō, Imba-gun, 1 September 2024, K. Oguchi KO24-218NR (TNS F-84794). Ibaraki: Ami machi sōgō undo-koen, Yoshiwara, Ami-machi, Inashiki-gun, 2 July 2024, K. Oguchi KO24-81NR (TNS F-84748). Ayumizaki-kōen, Saka, Kasumigaura-shi, K. Oguchi & K. Fujii KO24-210NR (TNS F-84788). Oshibi, Chikusei-shi, 1 June 2024, K. Oguchi KO24-3NR (TNS F-84730). Hanabatake, Tsukuba-shi, 1 July 2024, K. Oguchi KO24-67 (TNS F-84738); the same locality, 15 July 2024, K. Oguchi KO24-111NR (TNS F-84759). In Tsukuba Botanical Garden, Amakubo, Tsukuba-shi, 1 September 2024, K. Oguchi KO24-206NR (TNS F-84785). Kagawa: Sanuki kodomono-kuni, Yusa, Konan-chō, Takamatsu-shi, 5 November 2025, K. Oguchi KO25-379NR (TNS F-110979). Shiga: Karasaki-jinja, Karasaki, Ōtsu-shi, 22 June 2023, K. Oguchi KO23-3AD (TNS F-84844); Nagisa-kōen, Hama-Ōtsu, 2 November 2025, K. Oguchi & Y. Aso KO25-331NR (TNS F-110980). Shibafu-hiroba, Oroshimo-chō, Kusatsu-shi, 24 June 2025, K. Oguchi KO25-123 (TNS F-110975); the same locality, 2 November 2025, K. Oguchi & Y. Aso KO25-327NR (TNS F-110976). Tokushima: Tsukimigaoka-kōen, Yamanote, Toyooka, Matsushige-chō, Itano-gun, 4 November 2025, K. Oguchi KO25-349NR (TNS F-110977). Tokyo: Yakushi-ike-kōen, Machida-ku, Machida-shi, 6 July 2024, K. Oguchi KO24-107NR (TNS F-84756). Tottori: In the campus of Tottori University, Koyama-chō-minami, Tottori-shi, 29 June 2023, K. Oguchi KO23-36AD (TNS F-84727). Tottori deaino-mori, Katsurami, Tottori-shi, 29 June 2019, K. Oguchi 000333 (TNS F-84851); the same locality, 19 June 2020, K. Oguchi KO20-1AD (TNS F-84894). Wakayama: Near Manyō-kan, Wakaura-minami, Wakayama-shi, 26 June 2025, K. Oguchi & Y. Aso KO25-125 (TNS F-110978).

4. Habitat and Distribution

Usually gregarious in rows, often forming rows or incomplete to complete fairy rings. On soil in turf habitats, mainly dominated by Zoysia Willd. spp. and other plants represented by Artemisia princeps Pamp., Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik., Cyperus rotundus L., Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koel., Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn., Equisetum arvense L., Euphorbia maculata (L.) Small, Glechoma hederacea subsp. grandis (A.Gray) H.Hara, Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides Lam. (1789), Ixeridium dentatum subsp. dentatum (Thunb.) Tzvelev, Oenothera laciniata Hill, Oxalis corniculata L., Persicaria capitata (Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don) H.Gross, Persicaria longiseta (Bruijn) Kitag., Plantago asiatica L., Poa annua L., Portulaca oleracea L., Pseudognaphalium affine (D.Don) Anderb. (1991), Sagina japonica (Sw.) Ohwi, Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv., Spiranthes sinensis var. amoena (Pers.) Ames (M.Bieb.) H.Hara, Taraxacum spp., Trifolium pratense L. (1753), Trifolium repens L., Veronica persica Poir. and Vicia sativa subsp. nigra (L.) Ehrh.
JAPAN: Honshu (Chiba, Ibaraki, Shiga, Tokyo, Tottori and Wakayama Prefs.) and Shikoku (Kagawa and Tokushima Prefs.). CHINA: Guangdong Province (labeled as “M. maximus”, B6 and HTBM2533 in Figure 1 and Figure 2). Occurring in warm temperate to subtropical regions of East Asia.

5. Remarks

The basidiomata and habitat of M. neooreades are superficially similar to those of the European species M. oreades. However, M. oreades differs from M. neooreades by having larger and more robust basidiomata (pileus 13–50 mm and stipe 45–78 mm long × 2.5–6 mm wide) and, critically in lacking cheilocystidia [21]. These diagnostic differences are also evident in descriptions based on the neotype of Marasmius oreades (Bolton) F., which was designated based on the material from England [42]. Although DNA sequence data from the neotype specimens are not yet available, its European origin supports the application of the name M. oreades sensu stricto to European and North American populations.
Phylogenetically, sequences identified as M. oreades are divided into two distinct clades: one comprising European and North American specimens (Clade II in Figure 1 and Figure 2) and another including Asian collections from China, Korea, and Pakistan (Clade I in Figure 1 and Figure 2). Although no material from the type locality (England) was examined in this study, the former clade (Clade II) is interpreted here as M. oreades sensu stricto because all sequences from Europe were included in this clade. In contrast, M. neooreades is not nested within either lineage, and forms an independent, well-supported clade, indicating that it represents a distinct species rather than a geographic variant of M. oreades.
Several species of Marasmius sect. Globulares possess fleshy basidiomata and pilei that are off-white to brownish and thus resemble M. neooreades macroscopically, but all differ in key morphological, ecological, or phylogenetic characters. Marasmius albogrieseus, M. aurantioferrugineus, M. brunneospermus, M. collinus, M. desjardinii K.Das, Antonín & D.Chakr., M. heinemannianus, M. macrocystidiosus, M. maximus, M. nigrodiscus (Peck) Halling, M. nivicola, M. pseudocollinus, M. torquecens Quél., M. vagus Guard, M.D. Barrett & Farid and M. wynneae.
Marasmius albogriseus is similar in habit and habitat, but differs in its overall grayish coloration and the morphology of caulocystidia [2,21,43,44,45]. Marasmius aurantioferrugineus is distinguished by its larger basidiomata, reddish-brown pileus with radially rugulose surface, and occurrence on litter beneath Larix Mill. [28,46]. Marasmius brunneospermus differs in having a rugulose-reticulate pileus, strigose mycelium at the stipe base, a white to yellow-orange or brown spore print, and narrower basidiospores, and it occurs in forest habitats [6,11]. Marasmius collinus, although similar in basidiomata and grassland habitat, has crowded lamellae, a smooth stipe, a distinctive odor, and lacks cystidia [21,43,47,48].
The Indian species M. desjardinii differs from M. neooreades in its more slender basidiomata, closer lamellae, non-diverticulate cheilocystidia, forest habitat, and phylogenetic placement [49]. Marasium heinemannianus, another grassland species, is readily distinguished by its very large basidiomata, pale yellowish-white spore print, and large, subfusoid basidiospores [16]. Marasmius macrocystidiosus, known from Russia and Japan, differs in having a pubescent stipe surface, large clavate cheilocystidia, and a forest habitat, as well as in its phylogenetic position [4,29]. Marasmius maximus shares a similar pileus coloration and the presence of brownish squamules on the stipe, but is distinguished by its much larger basidiomata, radially sulcate-striate pileus surface, forest habitat, and smaller basidiospores [27,46].
Additional species can be distinguished from M. neooreades as follows: M. nigrodiscus possesses pleurocystidia [44]; M. nivicola has white basidiomata and occurs in forest habitats [8,21]; M. pseudocollinus has smaller basidiospores [43]; M. torquecens lacks stipe scales and shows a color transition from brown to black toward the stipe base [21,50]; M. vagus has orange to apricot pileus and Siccus-type broom elements [51]; and M. wynneae is characterized by whitish pileus and dark-colored stipes except at the apex [11]. Marasmius campestris, which also inhabits grasslands, differs markedly in its deeply sulcate, striate, purple-tinged pileus and exceptionally large basidiospores [52].
Morphologically and ecologically, M. neooreades accords well with the diagnostic features of Series Wynnearum [25], including fleshy basidiomata, distant and intervenose lamellae, absence of pleurocystidia, a hymeniform pileipellis composed of Globulares-type elements, and a grassland habitat. Its phylogenetic placement within the Wynnearum clade further supports this assignment.
In Japan, M. oreades has long been reported [26,46,53], but published accounts lack information on cheilocystidia, a critical character for distinguishing species within sect. Globulares. Based on the macromorphological descriptions provided by Imai [26] and Imazeki & Hongo [46], Japanese specimens previously identified as M. oreades show substantial overlap with M. neooreades in pileus size, coloration, lamellar spacing, stipe dimensions, and grassland habitat. Although microscopic features were not documented in those early studies, these similarities suggest that many Japanese records of “M. oreades” from temperate regions may in fact represent M. neooreades.
To clarify this issue, we re-examined historical specimens identified as M. oreades by Imai from Hokkaido (voucher specimens TMI 5745–5747, collected in 1930–1932). These specimens are approximately a century old and are largely contaminated by molds, precluding DNA extraction and detailed examination of critical characters such as the lamellar edge and stipe surface. Nevertheless, the available morphological features, including basidiospore shape and dimensions and a hymeniform pileipellis composed of Globulares-type elements, indicate that these specimens belong to Marasmius sect. Globulares. At present, it remains unclear whether the Hokkaido material represents M. oreades, M. neooreades, or a different taxon altogether. Accordingly, the occurrence of M. oreades sensu stricto in Japan cannot be excluded, although our results strongly suggest that populations widely distributed in temperate regions of Japan (excluding Hokkaido) and long identified as “M. oreades” correspond to M. neooreades.
In the phylogenetic analyses, M. neooreades formed a clade with two Chinese sequences labeled as M. maximus (B6 and HTBM2533). BLAST comparisons of the ITS region revealed high sequence similarity between the ex-holotype of M. neooreades (PX091517) and these Chinese sequences (99.84% for HTBM2533 and 98.80% for B6). However, M. maximus is morphologically distinct from M. neooreades, differing in its much larger basidiomata, forest habitat, felt-like mycelial mat, and smaller, more narrowly ellipsoid basidiospores. Moreover, other sequences identified as M. maximus from China and Korea formed a separate clade. These results strongly suggest that the Chinese vouchers B6 and HTBM2533 were misidentified and instead represent M. neooreades. Because HTBM2533 was collected from Guangdong Province (approximately 22° N) [54], M. neooreades is inferred to have a broad distribution spanning warm temperate to subtropical regions of East Asia. Further sampling from East and Southeast Asia will be necessary to understand its distributional range.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.O.; Methodology, K.O.; Validation, K.O. and K.H.; Formal Analysis, K.O.; Investigation, K.O. and K.H.; Resources, K.O. and K.H.; Data Curation, K.O. and K.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, K.O. and K.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, K.O. and K.H.; Visualization, K.O.; Supervision, K.H.; Project Administration, K.O. and K.H.; Funding Acquisition, K.O. and K.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP25KJ0676 and “Collection Building Fellowship” from the National Museum of Nature and Science to KH, and the cooperative research program of Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University No. 24082 to K.O.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available in this site (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 11 February 2026).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Shuji Ushijima, The Tottori Mycological Institute, Tottori, Japan, for providing access to Imai’s specimens.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kühner, R. Les Hyménomycètes Agaricoïdes; Numéro Spécial; Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon: Lyon, France, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  2. Singer, R. Marasmieae (Basidiomycetes-Tricholomataceae). Flora Neotrop. Monogr. 1976, 17, 1–347. [Google Scholar]
  3. Singer, R. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy, 4th ed.; Koeltz Scientific Books: Oberreifenberg, Germany, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kiyashko, A.A.; Malysheva, E.F.; Antonín, V.; Svetasheva, T.Y.; Bulakh, E.M. Fungi of the Russian Far East. 2. New species and new records of Marasmius and Cryptomarasmius (Basidiomycota). Phytotaxa 2014, 186, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shay, J.E.; Desjardin, D.E.; Perry, B.A.; Grace, C.L.; Newman, D.S. Biodiversity of Marasmius from Madagascar. Phytotaxa 2017, 292, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wannathes, N.; Desjardin, D.E.; Hyde, K.D.; Perry, B.A.; Lumyong, S. A monograph of Marasmius from Northern Thailand. Fungal Divers. 2009, 37, 209–306. [Google Scholar]
  7. Takahashi, H. Marasmius brunneospermus, a new species from Japan. Mycoscience 1999, 40, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Takahashi, H. Two new species of Marasmius. Mycoscience 2000, 41, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takahashi, H. Three new species of Marasmius sect. Sicci. Mycoscience 2000, 41, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Takahashi, H. Four new species of Crinipellis and Marasmius. Mycoscience 2002, 43, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Antonín, V.; Ryoo, R.; Shin, H.D. Marasmioid and gymnopoid fungi of the Republic of Korea. 2. Marasmius sect. Globulares. Persoonia 2010, 24, 9–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Desjardin, D.E. The Genus Marasmius from the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  13. Desjardin, D.E.; Horak, E. Marasmius and Gloiocephala in the South Pacific region: Papua New Guinea, New Caledonia and New Zealand taxa. Bibl. Mycol. 1997, 168, 1–152. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bhunjun, C.S.; Niskanen, T.; Suwannarach, N.; Wannathes, N.; Chen, Y.-J.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Buyck, B.; Zhao, C.-L.; Fan, Y.-G.; et al. The numbers of fungi: Are the most speciose genera truly diverse? Fungal Divers. 2022, 114, 387–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McIlvaine, C.; Macadam, R. One Thousand American Fungi; Dover Publications: Garden City, NY, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  16. Antonín, V. Marasmius heinemannianus, a new edible species from Benin, West Africa. Belg. J. Bot. 1998, 131, 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ballion, P. Recherches sur les cercles mycéliens (ronds de fées). Actes Soc. Linn. Bordx. 1906, 61, 62–88. [Google Scholar]
  18. Filer, T.H., Jr. Damage to turfgrasses caused by cyanogenic compounds produced by Marasmius oreades. Plant Dis. Report. 1965, 49, 571–574. [Google Scholar]
  19. Filer, T.H., Jr. Parasitic aspects of a fairy ring fungus, Marasmius oreades. Phytopathology 1965, 55, 1132–1134. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gilliam, M.S. The genus Marasmius in the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Mycotaxon 1976, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Antonín, V.; Noordeloos, M.E. A Monograph of Marasmioid and Collybioid Fungi in Europe; IHW Verlag: Eching, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  22. Moncalvo, J.-M.; Lutzoni, F.M.; Rehner, S.A.; Johnson, J.; Vilgalys, R. Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi. Syst. Biol. 2000, 49, 278–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oliveira, J.J.S.; Desjardin, D.E.; Jenkinson, T.S.; Margaritescu, S.; Capelari, M.; Moncalvo, J.-M. Taxonomic revision of Marasmius Fr. and Marasmiaceae Roze ex Kühner based on multigene phylogenetics and morphological evidence. Fungal Divers. 2024, 127, 1–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tan, Y.-S.; Desjardin, D.E.; Perry, B.A.; Vikineswary, S.; Noorlidah, A. Marasmius sensu stricto in Peninsular Malaysia. Fungal Divers. 2009, 37, 9–100. [Google Scholar]
  25. Oliveira, J.J.S.; Moncalvo, J.-M.; Margaritescu, S.; Capelari, M. A morphological and phylogenetic evaluation of Marasmius sect. Globulares (Globulares-Sicci complex) with nine new taxa from the Neotropical Atlantic Forest. Persoonia 2020, 44, 240–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Imai, S. Studies on the Agaricaceae of Hokkaido. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. 1938, 43, 179–378. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hongo, T. Notulae mycologicae. Mem. Fac. Lib. Arts Shiga Univ. 1962, 12, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hongo, T. Notulae mycologicae (4). Mem. Shiga Univ. Nat. Sci. 1965, 15, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  29. Maruyama, T.; Kasuya, T. Marasmius macrocystidiosus new to Japan. Jpn. J. Mycol. 2024, 65, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kornerup, A.; Wanscher, J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour, 3rd ed.; Methuen: London, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  31. Izumitsu, K.; Hatoh, K.; Sumita, T.; Kitade, Y.; Morita, A.; Tanaka, C.; Gafur, A.; Ohta, A.; Kawai, M.; Yamanaka, T.; et al. Rapid and simple preparation of mushroom DNA. Mycoscience 2012, 53, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Murray, M.G.; Thompson, W.F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 4321–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for Basidiomycetes: Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  37. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Trifinopoulos, J.; Nguyen, L.T.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. W-IQ-TREE. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W232–W235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bijmoer, R.; Guerrero, A.S.; Creuwels, J. Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL)—Botany; Naturalis Biodiversity Center: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Singer, R. The genus Marasmius in South America. Sydowia 1964, 18, 106–358. [Google Scholar]
  44. Halling, R.E. A synopsis of Marasmius section Globulares. Brittonia 1983, 35, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Halling, R.E.; Desjardin, D.; Tish, R.V. Additions to Marasmius section Globulares. Mycotaxon 1985, 22, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Imazeki, R.; Hongo, T. (Eds.) Coloured Illustrations of Fungi of Japan; Hoikusha: Osaka, Japan, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  47. Singer, R. Type studies on agarics. Lloydia 1942, 5, 97–135. [Google Scholar]
  48. Akçay, M.E. A new record for the macromycota of Turkey. Anatol. J. Bot. 2020, 4, 8–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Das, K.; Chakraborty, D.; Antonín, V. A novel species of Marasmius sect. Globulares from Indian Himalaya. Kew Bull. 2019, 74, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Breitenbach, J.; Kränzlin, F. Fungi of Switzerland; Verlag Mykologia: Lucerne, Switzerland, 1986; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  51. Crous, P.W.; Carnegie, A.J.; Wingfield, M.J.; Sharma, R.; Mughini, G.; E Noordeloos, M.; Santini, A.; Shouche, Y.S.; Bezerra, J.D.P.; Dima, B.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 868–950. Persoonia 2020, 42, 291–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liang, Z.-Q.; Su, M.-S.; Jiang, S.; Zeng, N.-K. Marasmius campestris sp. nov. Mycoscience 2017, 58, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Imazeki, R.; Hongo, T.; Otani, Y. Fungi of Japan; Yama-Kei Publishing: Tokyo, Japan, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yang, K.L.; Xiong, X.; Luo, Z.; Huang, Y.; Huang, R.; Chen, H.; Lin, J.Y.; Yang, Z.L.; Li, G.-M.; Jia, X. Human activity impacts on macrofungal diversity: A case study of grazing in subtropical forests. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic placement of Marasmius neooreades based on the ITS dataset using IQ-TREE. SH-aLRT support (X ≥ 90%), aBayes support (Y ≥ 0.95) and ultrafast bootstrap support (Z ≥ 90%) are indicated above or below the branches as X/Y/Z.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic placement of Marasmius neooreades based on the ITS dataset using IQ-TREE. SH-aLRT support (X ≥ 90%), aBayes support (Y ≥ 0.95) and ultrafast bootstrap support (Z ≥ 90%) are indicated above or below the branches as X/Y/Z.
Taxonomy 06 00021 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic placement of Marasmius neooreades based on the concatenated ITS + LSU dataset using IQ-TREE. SH-aLRT support (X ≥ 90%), aBayes support (Y ≥ 0.95) and ultrafast bootstrap support (Z ≥ 90%) are indicated above or below the branches as X/Y/Z.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic placement of Marasmius neooreades based on the concatenated ITS + LSU dataset using IQ-TREE. SH-aLRT support (X ≥ 90%), aBayes support (Y ≥ 0.95) and ultrafast bootstrap support (Z ≥ 90%) are indicated above or below the branches as X/Y/Z.
Taxonomy 06 00021 g002
Figure 3. Basidiomata of Marasmius neooreades. (A,B) TNS F-84738. (C) holotype TNS F-84727. (D) TNS F-84844. (E) TNS F-84759. Scale bars = 1 cm in (AC,E); 2 cm in (D).
Figure 3. Basidiomata of Marasmius neooreades. (A,B) TNS F-84738. (C) holotype TNS F-84727. (D) TNS F-84844. (E) TNS F-84759. Scale bars = 1 cm in (AC,E); 2 cm in (D).
Taxonomy 06 00021 g003
Figure 4. Marasmius neooreades. (A) Basidiomata (TNS F-84738). (B) Basidiomata (TNS F-84727, holotype). (C) Basidiospores (TNS F-84727, holotype). (D) Basidia (TNS F-84759). (E) Cheilocystidia (TNS F-84759). (F) Globulares-type elements on the pileipellis (F-84727, holotype). (G) Part of pileipellis (TNS F-84756). (H) Caulocystidia (TNS F-84756). Scale bars = 2 cm in (A,B); 5 µm in (C,D); 10 µm in (EH).
Figure 4. Marasmius neooreades. (A) Basidiomata (TNS F-84738). (B) Basidiomata (TNS F-84727, holotype). (C) Basidiospores (TNS F-84727, holotype). (D) Basidia (TNS F-84759). (E) Cheilocystidia (TNS F-84759). (F) Globulares-type elements on the pileipellis (F-84727, holotype). (G) Part of pileipellis (TNS F-84756). (H) Caulocystidia (TNS F-84756). Scale bars = 2 cm in (A,B); 5 µm in (C,D); 10 µm in (EH).
Taxonomy 06 00021 g004
Figure 5. Marasmius neooreades. (A) Cheilocystida (TNS F-84738). (B) Elements on the pileipellis (TNS F-84844). (C) Pileipellis (TNS F-84756). (D) Stipitipellis (TNS F-84756) in Melzer’s reagent. (E) Basidiospores (TNS F-84727, holotype). Scale bars = 5 µm in (A,B,E); 10 µm in (C,D).
Figure 5. Marasmius neooreades. (A) Cheilocystida (TNS F-84738). (B) Elements on the pileipellis (TNS F-84844). (C) Pileipellis (TNS F-84756). (D) Stipitipellis (TNS F-84756) in Melzer’s reagent. (E) Basidiospores (TNS F-84727, holotype). Scale bars = 5 µm in (A,B,E); 10 µm in (C,D).
Taxonomy 06 00021 g005
Table 1. Species, specimen/strain numbers, GenBank accession (ITS and LSU) numbers of the specimens.
Table 1. Species, specimen/strain numbers, GenBank accession (ITS and LSU) numbers of the specimens.
SpeciesSpecimen/Strain Number *ITSLSULocation
Marasmius albogriseusFDS-CA-04303PV263509USA
M. albogriseusJLF4827MH090925USA
M. aurantioferrugiineusHCCN 3571FJ904964FJ904946KOREA
M. aurantioferrugiineusVLA M-10513KJ662667RUSSIA
M. brunneospermusKPM-NC 0005011 (T)FJ904969FJ904951Kanagawa, JAPAN
M. brunneospermusBRNM 714568FJ904966FJ904948KOREA
M. campestrisHKAS80857 (T)KJ126766KJ126768CHINA
M. campestrisHKAS80858KJ126767KJ126769CHINA
M. centrocinnamomeusSFC20180704-02 (T)OP730947KOREA
M. centrocinnamomeusSFC20140703-03OP730948KOREA
M. desjardiniiKD 16-19MF630621INDIA
M. desjardiniiKD 16-32 (T)MF630620INDIA
M. macrocystidiosusTNS F-82701OR298280OR298282Niigata, JAPAN
M. macrocystidiosusLE295996 (T)KF774136KF896246RUSSIA
M. maximusNS16081406MN523279CHINA
M. maximusHTBM2533PX308931CHINA
M. maximusB6JX434662CHINA
M. maximusMHHNU 8461MK250944CHINA
M. maximusKG 224FJ904974FJ904956KOREA
M. maximusBRNM 714571FJ904977FJ904959KOREA
M. nigrodiscusTENN 049828KF774140USA
M. nigrodiscusTENN 59556KF774139USA
M. nivicolaKPM-NC 0006038 (T)FJ904973FJ904955Kanagawa, JAPAN
M. nivicolaBRNM 714574FJ904971FJ904953KOREA
M. oreadesPBM 2701 (CUW) MassachusettsDQ490641USA
M. oreadesMW66PP944579SWEDEN
M. oreadesNN055694JN943604JN941144DENMARK
M. oreadesBUNS12-00735MK226504MK238549SERBIA
M. oreadesWA0000071064MK028920POLAND
M. oreadesH33KC686867SWITZERLAND
M. oreadesZRL2015086LT716048KY418864CHINA
M. oreadesKP-3HF546217PAKISTAN
M. oreadesASIS21388KF668290KOREA
M. neooreadesTNS F-84794PX091511Chiba, JAPAN
M. neooreadesTNS F-84738PX091512Ibaraki, JAPAN
M. neooreadesTNS F-84730PX091513Ibaraki, JAPAN
M. neooreadesTNS F-84759PX091514PX090882Ibaraki, JAPAN
M. neooreadesTNS F-84785PX091515Ibaraki, JAPAN
M. neooreadesTNS F-84844PX091516PX090883Shiga, JAPAN
M. neooreadesTNS F-84727 (T)PX091517PX090884Tottori, JAPAN
M. neooreadesTNS F-84894PX091518PX090885Tottori, JAPAN
M. neooreadesTNS F-84756PX091519PX090886Tokyo, JAPAN
M. torquescensBRNM 691427GU266258GU266265KOREA
M. torquescensLE234906KF774164RUSSIA
M. vagusAQ1008080 (T)MT117839MT110674AUSTRALIA
M. vagusMalka_1MN764296USA
M. wynneaeDMS-9344190MT644909DENMARK
M. wynneaeHCCN G86FJ904979FJ904961KOREA
Cryptomarasmius brunneipurpureaJFK84FJ167646OR656945INDONESIA
C. zonataVPI3355AY916692AY916690USA
C. birhizomorphaBRNM 751593KF380831KF380835KOREA
* T: type specimen; bold: sequences obtained in this study.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oguchi, K.; Hosaka, K. A New Species of Marasmius Sect. Globulares Growing in Grassland from Japan. Taxonomy 2026, 6, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy6010021

AMA Style

Oguchi K, Hosaka K. A New Species of Marasmius Sect. Globulares Growing in Grassland from Japan. Taxonomy. 2026; 6(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy6010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oguchi, Kaito, and Kentaro Hosaka. 2026. "A New Species of Marasmius Sect. Globulares Growing in Grassland from Japan" Taxonomy 6, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy6010021

APA Style

Oguchi, K., & Hosaka, K. (2026). A New Species of Marasmius Sect. Globulares Growing in Grassland from Japan. Taxonomy, 6(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy6010021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop