Next Article in Journal
Application of Annealed Bambara Starch as a Stabilizer in Ice Cream Production
Previous Article in Journal
Pulmonary Drug Delivery through Responsive Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

New Trends in Composite Coagulants for Water and Wastewater Treatment

by
Eleftheria K. Tsoutsa
1,
Athanasia K. Tolkou
2,*,
George Z. Kyzas
2 and
Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis
1
1
Laboratory of Chemical Technology, Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Hephaestus Laboratory, School of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-65404 Kavala, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Macromol 2024, 4(3), 509-532; https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4030030
Submission received: 30 May 2024 / Revised: 14 July 2024 / Accepted: 16 July 2024 / Published: 22 July 2024

Abstract

:
Coagulation/Flocculation (C/F) process aims to efficiently eliminate turbidity, TSS, COD, BOD, toxic metals, phosphates, and UV254nm from wastewater. Both natural and synthetic coagulants, used alone or in conjunction with flocculants, play crucial roles in this treatment. This review summarizes recent trends in coagulants for wastewater treatment, highlighting a wide array of inorganic and organic coagulants that have demonstrated significant efficacy based on reviewed studies. Notably, Crab Shell Bio-Coagulant (CS) excels in turbidity remov5al, achieving a remarkable 98.91% removal rate, while oak leaves protein shows superior performance in TSS and COD removal. Synthetic inorganic coagulants like PALS, PSiFAC1.5:10:15, and PAPEFAC1.5-10-15 demonstrate outstanding turbidity removal rates, over 96%. POFC-2 coagulant stands out for efficiently removing TSS and COD from domestic wastewater, achieving up to 93% removal for TSS and 89% for COD. Moreover, the utilization of FeCl3 as an inorganic coagulant alongside chitosan as an organic flocculant shows promise in reducing turbidity, COD, and polyphenols in wastewater from vegetable oil refineries. PE-2, a novel organic coagulant, demonstrates exceptional efficacy in eliminating turbidity, TSS, COD, and BOD from sugar industry wastewater. Chitosan shows effectiveness in removing TOC and orthophosphates in brewery wastewater. Additionally, CTAB shows high efficiency in removing various toxic metal ions from wastewater. The hybrid coagulants: PAAP0.1,0.5 and PPAZF accomplish exceptional turbidity removal rates, approximately 98%.

1. Introduction

In recent times, there has been a growing interest among researchers in addressing environmental concerns associated with the mineral processing industry [1]. A significant area of focus within this realm involves finding efficient methods for treating wastewater generated during mineral processing operations [2].
Researchers have explored various approaches, including physical adsorption [3], coagulation/flocculation [4], membrane separation [5,6], and microbiological methods [7], which have shown promising outcomes in treating wastewater. These methods are favored for their simplicity in operation and the well-established nature of their technologies [8]. Moreover, there has been ongoing exploration into advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for treating mineral processing wastewater. Examples include photocatalytic processes [9], ozone oxidation [10], and Fenton processes [11].
Coagulation/flocculation is a crucial process in water and wastewater treatment that involves adding a coagulant to a liquid to destabilize suspended particles [12]. This leads to the formation of larger flocs, which adsorb colloidal and dissolved organic matter onto their surfaces and can be more easily removed through sedimentation [13]. This process effectively removes suspended solids, such as biological solids, soil, particles discharged in wastewater, and decaying organic matter, more than 97% [14], and enhances water quality [15] by eliminating impurities such as dyes, up to 100% [16], organic matter [17], bacteria, and viruses by 99% [18]. Additionally, in some instances, coagulation/flocculation can reduce the amount of chemicals needed for treatment, as certain coagulants also act as disinfectants [19]. As a fundamental environmental protection technology, coagulation/flocculation has a wide range of applications in water and wastewater treatment facilities [20]. It is particularly effective for treating surface wastewaters by removing suspended solids (SS) [21], colloidal particles [22], natural organic matter (NOM) [23], biological oxygen demand (BOD) [24], chemical oxygen demand (COD) [25], and other soluble inorganic compounds like phosphate ions [26] and metals like antimony [27]. Research has shown that coagulation/flocculation can also be used as a pre- or post-treatment method for hazardous wastewater. When combined with other treatment processes, such as submerged biological filters (bioreactors), coagulation can significantly enhance treatment efficiency, particularly for refractory wastewaters.
Organic and inorganic materials, used commonly as coagulants and adsorbents, such as aluminum-based [28,29], iron-based [30,31], silica-based [32], are categorized as metal-based coagulants and adsorbents [33]. These coagulants can have detrimental effects, including corrosiveness, high costs, non-degradability, and toxic residues that necessitate special handling [34]. Organic coagulants like polyaluminum chloride (PAC) [35], and polyferric sulfate (PFS) [27] are frequently used because of their high coagulation efficiency at low dosages. However, their use is limited due to their poor biodegradability and low dispersion in water, attributed to their molecular structure [35].
Given the health and environmental issues associated with chemical coagulants, researchers in the water and wastewater industry have been actively exploring non-toxic and environmentally friendly alternatives [36,37]. These alternatives, identified as natural coagulants, are typically classified into plant-origin [38], animal-origin [39], and microorganism-origin [36] types. Natural coagulants are investigated more because of their availableness and properties. They have arisen as a promising way for water and wastewater treatment [40]. These coagulants, chiefly polysaccharides, have established excellent effectiveness in this function. Several advantages are offered, as well as biodegradation, sustainable production, low cost, and they are available [12]. Natural coagulants that are carbohydrates macromolecules, are originating from various plants such as fruits, leaves, seeds, and peels. They entourages physicochemical properties that assist the coagulation flocculation process in water treatment, beyond carboxyl, hydroxyl, and phenolic groups [41].
Hybrid components represent innovative materials with considerable promise for wastewater treatment, offering enhanced efficiency and cost-effectiveness compared to conventional inorganic coagulants and organic flocculants, respectively. The incorporation of functional chemical components into an initial chemical structure to create hybrid materials enhances the aggregation process during coagulation-flocculation in wastewater treatment. Hybrid materials surpass individual components primarily due to the synergistic effects of their elements, which contribute to greater stability compared to standard inorganic coagulants, particularly during storage [42].
The aim of this review paper is to emphasize recently developed natural and chemical coagulants tailored for the treatment of water and wastewater. The review covers the current decade, with an emphasis on the last 3 years. In contrast to earlier studies [43,44], this paper stands out by comprehensively detailing experimental parameters and directly comparing various coagulants, natural, chemical or hybrid, based solely on their removal rates, albeit across different sets of parameters. The diagram in Figure 1 illustrates the different categories of coagulants.

2. Natural Coagulants

Magnetic rice starch (MS), is a magnetic carbonized starch combining rice starch and Fe3O4 in a 1:1 ratio, and was invested by Sibiya et al. [45]. Magnetite (F) was synthesized by mixing 0.4 Μ Fe3+ and 0.2 Μ Fe2+ solutions, agitating, and adding oleic acid, then adjusting the pH to 12 until a black precipitate formed. The precipitate was heated at 70 °C, washed with distilled water and ethanol, and dried at 80 °C for 12 h. Finally, magnetite was combined with rice starch and calcined at 550 °C for 1 h to create magnetic rice starch (MS). The prepared effluent had 11.78 NTU initial turbidity, a TSS concentration of 6.5 mg/L, and COD concentration of 73 mg/L. Coagulation was conducted with stirring at 150 rpm for 2 min (quick mixing), followed by 30 rpm for 15 min (slow mixing). The samples were then allowed to settle for 10 to 60 min, with and without a magnetic field (MF). Results showed that magnetic starch (MS) removed 86% of contaminants (turbidity and TSS) and reduced COD by 55%. Furthermore, MS showed the removal of COD was 56%, turbidity 88%, and TSS 87% when exposed to the magnetic field. The application of magnetic field enhances settling capabilities, resulting in reduced concentrations of suspended particles, and activated sludge, thereby augmenting the efficiency of wastewater management [45]. For several decades, researchers have observed that magnetism is a distinctive property that autonomously contributes to water purification by influencing the physical and chemical characteristics of contaminants in water of contaminants in water. Magnetic exposure to water changes the properties of water and the edge between water and a solid surface sun-drying [46].
Three optimal plants—neem, cassava, and wild betel—were selected as plant-based coagulants (PBC) [47]. Leaves from these locally available plants were collected and dried at 50 °C for 48 h, crushed into powder, and filtered to obtain fine particles. Equal weights of these powdered leaves were mixed thoroughly with distilled water for to ensure homogeneity. The resulting mixture was filtered and used directly for experimentation after preparation to maintain its effectiveness. During the experiment, rapid mixing and slow mixing were conducted at 180 rpm for 3 min and 10 rpm for 20 min, respectively, followed by a 30-min sedimentation period. The properties of the actual wastewater included turbidity ranging from 392.67 to 657.33 NTU, COD concentrations between 711.00 and 727.33 mg/L, TSS levels from 776 to 876 mg/L, and color parameters between 1736 and 1789 ADM at pH 7.13–7.21. The findings showed that plant-based coagulants effectively reduced the measured pollutants, including 85.17% of turbidity, 80.28% of TSS, 53.63% of COD, and 59.42% of color when applied at a dosage of 0.79 mg/L [47].
Crab shells were first washed multiple times to eliminate debris [48]. The cleaned shells were then dried at 220 °C for 15 min and ground into a raw powder (RCS) using a mortar and pestle. To prepare the bio-coagulant (CS), 100 g of RCS was mixed with 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution at a solid-liquid ratio of 1:10 (w/v) in a 1 L beaker. This mixture was stirred for 2 h at 70 °C with a magnetic stirrer. During deproteinization, slight foaming occurred due to the release of proteins from the chitin chains, which eventually subsided. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and allowed to settle for 30 min, then filtered. The filtrate was bleached with a 5% NaClO solution at a solid-liquid ratio of 1:10 (w/v) for 30 min. The resulting solid could be processed into chitin/chitosan. The experiment conducted with 17.5 mL/L of bio-coagulant, contained 31.6 mg/L of chitosan-protein complex. The optimal removal rates for turbidity were 98.91%, BOD5 was 92.05%, and COD was 78.92%, were achieved in fish processing wastewater (FPW), >1000 NTU turbidity, 3735 mg O2/L COD, and 2345.5 mg O2/L BOD5 at a pH of 11.3 and a temperature of 25 °C [48].
The oak leaves powder coagulant was washed with tap water, dried 24 h to preserve active coagulation compounds, grinded and sieved to achieve a fine, homogeneous powder [49]. This study examines the use of proteins extracted from oak (Quercus robur) leaves to treat industrial oily wastewater. The research assesses the removal efficiency for 187 NTU turbidity, 969 mg/L TSS, and 784.45 mg/L COD at a pH of 12 and a coagulant dose of 0.538 mg/L. The results showed removal rates of 96.87% for turbidity, 96.39% for COD, and 89.86% for TSS [49].
The Moringa peregrina seed extract was prepared by stirring seed powder in water, with the extraction process conducted at three different temperatures (20 °C, 40 °C, and 60 °C) before filtering the extract [50]. Each mL of this solution corresponded to 10 mg of dry seeds. The Moringa seed powder was extracted with 100 mL of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 M NaCl solutions to identify the optimal extraction conditions regarding temperature and salt concentration. To remove the oil, crushed seeds were mixed with petroleum ether and stirred. The oil-extracted seeds were then filtered and left to dry overnight at room temperature. The dried seeds were then extracted with extracting solution under the optimal conditions (60 °C and 0.5 M NaCl) for 1 h. Each mL of this solution equaled 10 mg of dry Moringa seeds. The resulting raw crushed seed extract after oil removal (MPDOEx) were used as coagulants in the coagulation experiment. The initial measurements were 99.1 NTU for turbidity and 188 mg/L for COD. At an optimal seed dosage of 400 mg/L and a pH of 9, the removal efficiency were 38% COD, and 81% of turbidity. The initial concentrations of the metals were as follows: 2.1 mg/L for cadmium, 3.1 mg/L for cobalt, 11.0 mg/L for chromium, 8.1 mg/L for copper, 10.1 mg/L for manganese, 71.8 mg/L for molybdenum, and 3.8 mg/L for nickel. Manganese and nickel exhibited minimal removal efficiency, both being below 15%. However, the other metals showed moderate to high removal rates. The de-oiled Moringa peregrina seed extract, at a dose equivalent to 200 mg/L of raw seeds, was able to remove 97.4% of molybdenum, 66.5% of copper, 51.8% of cadmium, 50.3% of chromium, and 45.8% of cobalt [50].
Prickly pear (PP) fruit peel mucilage gel was assessed as a new coagulant for wastewater treatment [51]. Hydrated prickly pear fruit peels were manually squeezed to obtain a highly viscous gel. To this gel, 95% ethanol was added, resulting in the formation of a milky white supernatant, which corresponded to the mucilage. The mucilage was dried, then reconstituted in distilled water to form a gel-like substance, which was used as a coagulant. The domestic wastewater collected at the tertiary treatment inlet showed high turbidity, 88.00 NTU, and colour, 671 TCU. Coagulation experiments using a coagulant dose of 12 mg/L at a pH of 13 achieved 94% turbidity removal and 85% color removal efficiency [51].
Almond (Prunus dulcis) hull and also cherry (Prunus avium) pit were preferred as plant-based coagulants [52]. The almond hulls and cherry pits were soaked and dried in an fryer at 70 °C for 1 day. Each natural coagulant was then edged into a powder, cool naturally, and kept. The cattle wastewater had parameters of 7207 NTU turbidity, 21,178 mg O2/L COD, and 6930 mg/L TSS. The experiments tested in pH 3, 6, 7, and 9. The results demonstrated that using 0.1 g/L This efficiency can be enhanced to 58.2l at pH 3, it was possible to achieve removal rates of 39.1% for COD, 38.3% for turbidity, and 52.9% for TSS. In contrast, using 0.1 g/L cherry pit at pH value of 3, the removal efficiencies were 42.4% for COD, 88.8% for turbidity, and 22.3% for TSS [52].
Moringa oleifera seeds powder (MOSP) served as the coagulant to remove 7.88 mg/L Amido Black 10B dye and high level of turbidity [53]. To eliminate any remaining moisture of these seeds, they were extracted from the pods and subjected to drying in an oven at 50 °C for one day. Before grinding, the seed shells were removed. The results revealed that both turbidity and dye could be completely removed under specific conditions: 0.34 mg/L MOSP dosage, 7.88 mg/L dye concentration at pH 6.93. Experimental findings showed that the removal of turbidity was 98.5% in synthetic wastewater and the dye removal was 92.2% [53].
The prevalent Avicennia marina plant, belonging to the Verbenaceae family, dominates 97% of the total mangrove habitats in the state [54]. The shed leaves of A. marina were washed, dried, and subsequently shredded and ground into powder. Subsequently, the AMC underwent chemical treatment individually by the addition of 0.05 M HCl, 0.05 M NaOH, and 0.5 M NaCl. The mixtures of AMC and hydrolyzing agents were agitated. The filtrate from these mixtures was collected, and the remaining residues were labeled as HCl-treated AMC, NaOH-treated AMC, and NaCl-treated AMC, respectively. For the mud water, the initial turbidity was measured at 15.15 NTU, with an ideal pH of 7.82. In contrast, for the starch water, the initial turbidity was slightly higher at 16.36 NTU, with an ideal pH of 7.9. The dosage of all AMCs tested was maintained at 1.0 g/L. In mud water, the coagulant activities of various AMCs were observed to range from 89.74% to 95.87%, with native AMC showing the lowest activity and HCl treated AMC exhibiting the highest. Similarly, in starch water, coagulant activities ranged from 89.88% to 96.90%, with HCl treated AMC demonstrating the highest activity [54].
The study of Ovuoraye et al. 2021 [55] investigates the effectiveness of Eggshell Coagulant (ESC) in the coagulation-flocculation treatment of cosmetic wastewater. The process of preparing the coagulant from Eggshell involved sun-drying, also used for industrial drying processes [56], for approximately 3 weeks. After subsequent drying, the samples were crushed and ground to improve their surface area. Afterward, they underwent screening to form a finer particle flour. The examination of the wastewater sample reveals a total suspended solids (TSS) concentration of 232 mg/L. The ideal pH and dosage are determined to be 6 and 0.2 g/L, respectively. At this optimal point, there is an 85% removal efficiency for TSS, resulting in a residual TSS concentration of 38 mg/L after treatment with ESC [55].
Aloe vera, harvested from Algerian fields, was prepared for use a coagulant; washed with tap water, dried to preserve active components, grinded, and sieved [57]. Subsequently, Aloe vera powder was combined with water and stirred to extract the active coagulants. Once settled, the supernatant was passed through a filter to gain the liquid coagulant. The coagulation process performed well at pH 7 with an initial turbidity of 13 NTU. Optimal dosages of 10 mg/L of Aloe vera powder (AV-Powder) and 0.1 mL/L of liquid Aloe vera (AV-H2O) were used. Results indicated that employing the natural coagulant. AV-Powder reduced water turbidity by 28.23% and AV-H2O by 87.84% [57].
Dillenia indica fruits were collected and rinsed with distilled water [58]. The seeds were manually separated, air-dried for 15 days, ground into powder, and sieved. For extraction, seed powder was oil extracted using ethanol over three cycles until the ethanol became colorless. The seed residue was dried at room temperature. To prepare the crude coagulant, residue was dissolved in distilled water, mixed, and filtered through muslin cloth. The D. indica seeds surface area was 1.6735 m2/g and the pore volume was 0.0022 cm3/g. The average concentrations of Bisphenol A and DEHP in the leachate were 31 mg/L and 15 mg/L, respectively. Under optimal conditions, pH 8.5 removal efficiencies of 60% for 4,4′- (1-methylethylidene)bis- (Bisphenol A) with dosage of 1066 mg/L, and 55% for bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) with a dosage of 958 mg/L were achieved [58].
Cassava peel starch (CPS) shows potential as an alternative to alum coagulant for removing turbidity, TSS, and COD from levels 194 NTU, 284/L, and 296 mg/L, respectively [59] Raw CPS samples were sourced from a small-medium industry and processed to eliminate impurities. The procedure involved screening, filtration, peeling, and drying the cassava peels. First the peels were washed with tap water, second rinsed with distilled water and also filtered and dried to eliminate any remaining moisture. The dried peels were blended into a starch slurry, which was then filtered and placed in a settling tank. The starch residue was isolated from the slurry and underwent an additional wash with distilled water. Subsequently, the starch residue was dried, while the peels were finely ground into powder. An alum solution was created by dissolving aluminum sulfate hydrate in distilled water. Similarly, a stock solution of CPS coagulant was made by dissolving CPS powder in distilled water, with vigorous mixing. Doses for each test were determined from the stock solution, with mixtures ranging from 0% to 100% CPS to alum ratio. The best removal of turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) occurred at pH 6.0, achieving removal rates of 60.19%, 57.79%, and 30.19%, respectively, with a CPS concentration of 448.58 mg/L. At pH 8, with a 4:1 ratio of CPS to alum, the removal efficiencies increased to 77.48% for turbidity, 77.34% for TSS, and 56.89% for COD [59].
Table 1 compares all the data of the novel coagulants and the Figure 2 compares the removal rate of turbidity, TSS, and COD. All of the natural coagulants remove efficiency the turbidity, but the most effective is Crab Shell Bio-Coagulant (CS), reach 98.91% turbidity removal [48]. Furthermore, oak leaves protein was removing the highest TSS and COD concentration [49]. In all of this research, the wastewater that used to be removed, were rice starch-containing effluent [45], fish processing [48], industrial oil [49], domestic [51], cattle [52], synthetic for dye removal [53], mud and starch water [54], cosmetic [55], leachate contained bisphenol A and DEHP [58].

Natural Coagulants with Flocculants Added

The coagulant was derived from the mucilage content found in prickly pear peel waste [60]. The peel waste underwent washing and cleaning with tap water followed by deionized water. Next, the waste was blended with the deionized water using a blender and heated at 50 °C for an hour. After cooling to room temperature, absolute ethanol was then added at a 1:3 (v/v) ratio, and the mixture was left to settle for 24 h at refrigerator. Following this, the mixture underwent vacuum filtration to obtain the mucilage extract, which was subsequently dried at room temperature for 24 h. Finally, the dried extract was ground into a powder using a mortar and stored in the refrigerator. The production yield of the coagulant was estimated to be 0.25% w/w. In these experiments, added 1 mg/L flocculant, a commercial anionic polymer The findings indicate that the most effective conditions for turbidity removal, achieving 76.1%, occur at a water pH of 4 with a coagulant dosage of 100 mg/L. However, when the wastewater pH is adjusted to 7.8 and the coagulant dose is increased to 250 mg/L, the efficiency decreases to 51.7%. This efficiency can be enhanced to 58.2% by employing a blend consisting of 30% coagulant and 70% aluminum sulfate at optimal proportions [60]. According to Aguilera Flores et al., 2024, bio- coagulants are investigated within dual systems alongside chemical coagulants like aluminum salts to enhance their efficiency in reducing water turbidity, while also minimizing the quantity of chemicals of agents used and of the production of sludge.
Table 2 depicts the two different natural coagulants, used with an anionic polymer as flocculant to remove turbidity. For the Prickly pear peel waste, the best removal was at pH 4 with the removal rate being 76.1% [60]. Otherwise, the coagulant that derived from the mixing of 30% prickly pear peel waste and 70% aluminum sulfate achieved 58.1% removal of turbidity at pH 7.8 [60].

3. Inorganic Coagulants

Ali et al. [19] investigated an innovative polymeric inorganic coagulant-flocculant called poly-ferric chloride (POFC), which was prepared using iron-containing waste [19]. Blast furnace iron or pickling waste, along with industrial-grade sodium carbonate from Solvay Alexandria Trading L.L.C., Egypt, are utilized as low-cost raw materials to produce various polymeric coagulants. These coagulants have the general structure Fen(Clx(OH)3−x)n [19]. In this study evaluated the efficiency of POFC-1 and POFC-2 coagulants in removing turbidity, TSS, and COD from domestic wastewater. The difference between the two coagulants is the ratio of OH/Fe. Coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation experiments were performed using 10 mg/L (0.1 mL/L) of various POFCs without any added flocculant. The experiment conducted with a rapid mixing speed of 300 rpm for 4 min followed by a sedimentation time of 30 min The influent wastewater had a COD of 342 mg/L, TSS of 300 mg/L, and turbidity of 86 NTU. The results showed that POFC coagulants performed highly effectively in treating domestic wastewater, achieving removal rates of 82–93% for TSS, 78–92% for turbidity, and 67–89% for COD. It was observed that increasing the OH/Fe ratio (basicity) from 0.8 to 2 decreased the efficiency due to reduced charge density on the POFC surface and diminished neutralizing capability. No further improvement was noted with higher POFC basicity. POFC-1-0.8 and POFC-20.8 exhibited superior performance in removing TSS, turbidity, and COD compared to other formulations, with only slight differences in their removal efficiencies [19].
The study of examined the combined removal of Sb(III) and Sb(V) from wastewater using polymeric ferric sulfate (PFS) and an oxidation process [27]. The findings revealed that PFS was more effective at removing Sb(III) than Sb(V) in terms of coagulant dosage, pH conditions, and resistance to interference. In a pure water matrix with 1 mg/L of Sb, a PFS dose of 60 mg/L at a final pH of 5.0 resulted in 95% removal of Sb(III) and 90% removal of Sb(V). Additionally, experiments conducted with printing and dyeing wastewater (PDW) containing 0.085 mg/L Sb(III) and 0.1 mg/L Sb(V) showed that pre-reducing Sb(V) to Sb(III) significantly enhanced the total Sb removal, increasing it from 72.0% to 97.5% During the experiment, the presence of Sb(V) was rapidly detected upon the addition of PFS, indicating the partial oxidation of Sb(III) during the coagulation. The oxidation dynamics of Sb(III) and the fluctuation in Sb(V) concentration were influenced by both the dosage of PFS and the pH conditions. For instance, when 10 mg/L PFS was used, the concentration of Sb(V) peaked at 36.5 μg/L after 5 min, minimizing to 19.0 μg/L after 1 h. Raising the PFS dosage to 60 mg/L led to an elevated peak concentration of Sb(V) reaching 36.5 μg/L within 10 min, followed by a subsequent decline to 13.1 μg/L. The hydrolysis products of PFS functioned as catalysts in the oxidation of Sb(III), a mechanism facilitated by either dissolved oxygen or abiotic electron transfer from Sb(III) to Fe(III). The pH levels, particularly in the range of 9–11, were found to promote higher concentrations of Sb(V), with levels peaking at 81 μg/L at 10 min [27].
Composite coagulants FeCl3–AlCl3 and FeSO4–Al2(SO4)3 were prepared by mixing solutions of ferric chloride (FeCl3) with aluminum chloride (AlCl3), and ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) with aluminum sulfate (Al2(SO4)3) [61]. The mixture was quickly stirred for 1 min at 200 rpm, then slowly stirred for 30 min at 30 rpm, followed by a 30-min settling period. 0.519 mg/L of total phosphorus (P) was removed using two coagulants, FeCl3–AlCl3 and FeSO4–Al2(SO4)3. At pH levels of 5 and 7, these coagulants eliminated 91.31% and 86.82% of the total phosphorus, respectively [61].
The polyaluminum silicate sulfate (PASS) utilized to remove 196.67 mg/L of CODCr from coking wastewater [62]. In was synthesized PASS in the laboratory following a modified procedure, resulting in an Al/Si ratio of 5. A concentration of 7 mmol/L PASS and pH 7, and resulted in reducing the CODCr level from 196.67 mg/L to 59.94 mg/L, corresponding to a reduction of 69.5% [62].
Waste aluminum foil was utilized as the primary source of aluminum to produce PACl coagulant [63]. Initially, the granular aluminum foil waste underwent a cleaning process with hot water to eliminate pollutants, followed by drying at 60 °C. The drained aluminum foil underwent hydrolyzation with hot HCl solution while continuously stirring, resulting in the formation of aluminum chloride solution. Subsequently, the reaction temperature of the aluminum chloride solution was raised to 75 °C with stirring. Dropwise addition of NaOH solution under continuously stirring raised the pH to 9 and attained a 2:1 molar ratio of OH to Al, facilitating the format of polyaluminum chloride (PACl) coagulant in the form of a white gel product. After aging for 24 h, the gel was separated through centrifugation, washed multiple times with deionized water, and after dried at 85 °C in air. Under the ideal parameters, which include a pH of 6.5, a temperature of 35 °C, and specific mixing conditions involving rapid agitation for 2 min at 280 rpm followed by slower mixing for 30 min at 80 rpm, along with a settling period of 30 min thereafter, over 98% of turbidity and approximately 69.8% of DOC impurities can be effectively eliminated using a reduced dosage of 25 mg/L PACl coagulant [63].
In accordance with He et al. 2023 [64], Polyaluminum Lanthanum Silicate Coagulant, PALS, was synthesized via co-polymerization to act as a novel coagulant. To prepare the coagulants, pH of a 2.0% sodium silicate solution (w/w Si) was adjusted to 3. This solution was then stirred vigorously and left to stand. Aluminum chloride (AlCl3) and lanthanum chloride (LaCl3·7H2O) were added to the solution with continuous stirring. After 1 h of stirring, sodiumbicarbonate (NaHCO3) was gradually introduced. The mixture was then stirred for another 3 h and aged for 12 h. The resulting products were dried in a vacuum dryer. Those dried composites were then ground and screened, resulting in PALS. In the coagulation experiments, simulated water was prepared using kaolin, humic acid, and potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4). Kaolin was used to mimic turbidity, humid acid to present organic matter, and KH2PO4 to pretend total phosphorus (TP). The parameters of simulated wastewater were 28.6–30.2 NTU turbidity, 2 mg/L TP, and 29.68–30.42 mg/L dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The maximum turbidity reduction, approximately 99%, was achieved with a dosage of 12 mg/L at a pH of 8. At pH 8, the removal efficiency of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was only around 52% with a dosage of 14 mg/L, whereas it significantly increased to approximately 70% at pH 3–7. These findings indicate that acidic conditions are more favorable for the removal of macromolecular organics and colloids, while alkaline conditions are less conducive to dissolved organic matter removal. At a dosage of 8 mg/L and pH 6, the maximum removal efficiency for total phosphorus (TP) could achieve nearly 99.6% [64].
To prepare the poly-ferric-titanium-silicate-chloride (PFTSC) and poly-titanium-silicate-chloride (PTSC) coagulants, an aqueous solution of sodium metasilicate nonahydrate Na2SiO3 was first added dropwise to an aqueous HCl solution until the pH reached 4, followed by continuous stirring to activate the polysilicic acid (PSA) solution. Separately, NaOH solution was adjusted to a titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) solution or a combination of TiCl4 and iron trichloride (FeCl3) while stirring continuously to adjust the alkalinity, resulting in the formation of polytitanium-chloride (PTC) and poly-ferric-titanium-chloride (PFTC) solutions. Subsequently, a measured amount of either PFTC or PTC solution was added to the activated PSA solution. The resulting mixture was stirred and allowed to mature at room temperature to produce the PFTSC and PTSC coagulants. The wastewater had a pH of 9, with initial turbidity of 40 NTU, DOC concentration of 480 mg/L, and COD level of 2000 mg/L. When the dosages of both coagulants were 800 mg/L, PFTC achieved a turbidity removal rate of 93.2%, COD removal rate of 10.7%, and DOC removal rate of 10.1%. Meanwhile, PTSC showed a turbidity removal rate of 80%, with slightly lower removal rates for organic matter compared to PFTC [65].
The targeted coagulants, featuring a long and flexible chain of polyacrylic acid (PAA), contain many –COOH groups within the polymer structure, which can coordinate stoichiometrically with Fe3+ ions [66]. To achieve optimal coagulant performance, it was anticipated that each –COOH group would combine with one Fe3+ ion, resulting in maximum positive charge density and active complexation sites for organic pollutants. The pH condition of the synthesis medium was crucial, considering the deprotonation of PAA and the hydrolysis of Fe3+ during the preparation process. In this study, the coagulant was synthesized by slowly adding a 0.14 mol/L sodium polyacrylate (PAAS) solution into a 0.185 mol/L FeCl3·6H2O solution under rapid stirring at 25 °C. To prevent precipitation, the pH of PAAS was adjusted to 3 before the titration step. The resulting coagulants, prepared with Fe3+ to PAA molar ratios of 1:0.1, 1:1, and 1:2, were labeled Fe-PAA-1:0.1, Fe-PAA-1:1, and Fe-PAA-1:2, respectively. The initial concentration of Fe was determined to be 0.1 mM. The pH condition is crucial in the coagulation process, as it affects the deprotonation of HA, hydrolysis of Fe3+, and subsequent interaction between humic acid and the coagulant. As such, all the coagulants in this study demonstrated superior coagulation performance at pH 5 compared to pH 7 and 9, with regard to optimal TOC removal rates. The findings indicated that Fe-PAA-1:0.1 achieved around 80% TOC removal, Fe-PAA-1:1 exceeded 80% TOC removal, and Fe-PAA-1:2 achieved just under 80% TOC removal. Overall, the coagulant Fe-PAA-1:1 with an R ratio of 1:1 showed the best coagulation performance due to its broad applicable pH range and low residual Fe3+ level [66].
Composite coagulants, specifically PSiFAC (polyaluminum ferric silicate chloride), were synthesized at room temperature under various experimental conditions and different ratios of components and polymerization modes [67]. The initial solutions used included 0.5 M AlCl3·6H2O, 0.5 M FeCl3·6H2O, 0.5 M NaOH as the added base, and a prepared polysilicic acid (pSi) solution. The process involved adding an appropriate amount of ferric chloride solution to an aluminum chloride solution, with vigorous stirring, at specific Al/Fe ratios. Subsequently, the pSi was introduced at desired Al+Fe/Si ratios. Finally, the polymerization of aluminum was achieved by slowly adding the required amount of NaOH solution under magnetic stirring. Three different industrial wastewater samples were analyzed: tanner wastewater with 668 NTU turbidity, 6800 mg/L COD, 1.76 mg/L phosphates, and 2.981 UV254nm; yeast manufacturing wastewater that had undergone preliminary anaerobic treatment, with 418 NTU turbidity, 11,455 mg/L COD, 3.49 mg/L phosphates, and 3.748 UV254nm; the same yeast wastewater after subsequent aerobic treatment, showing 143 NTU turbidity, 4590 mg/L COD, 2.40 mg/L phosphates, and 3.307 UV254nm. The addition of 80–100 mg/L of PSiFAC1.5:10:15 achieved the following results: for tanner wastewater, 96% reduction in NTU turbidity, 67% reduction in COD, 62% reduction in phosphates, and 10% reduction in UV254nm; for yeast manufacturing wastewater, 14% reduction in NTU turbidity, 22% reduction in COD, 38% reduction in phosphates, and 15% reduction in UV254nm; and for yeast wastewater after aerobic treatment, 40% reduction in NTU turbidity, 56% reduction in COD, 43% reduction in phosphates, and 25% reduction in UV254nm [67].
As per Tolkou et al. 2015 [67] PSiFAC1.5:10:15, PAFSiC1.5:15:10, PFASiC1.5:15:10, and PACl1.5 invested to remove turbidity and UV254nm from simulated surface water (17.2 NTU and 0.153 UV254nm absorbance) and from tanner wastewater (>2000 NTU). Fe solution was added to Al solution with vigorous stirring to achieve desired Al/Fe ratios, forming pFA. To prepare coagulants, pSi solution was mixed with pFA at desired Al+Fe/Si ratios, and a base solution was slowly added under magnetic stirring to reach desired OH/Al ratios. Coagulants made using co-polymerization are called PSiFAC. PSiFAC1.5:10:15 denotes OH/Al 1.5, Fe/Si 10, and Al/Si+Fe 15. For PAFSiC, pFSi was mixed with an Al solution at various Al/Si+Fe ratios, and a base solution was slowly added to reach desired OH/Al ratios. Coagulants made by co-polymerization are called PAFSiC. PAFSiC1.5:15:10 signifies OH/Al 1.5, Fe/Si 15, and Al/Si+Fe 10. Similarly, pSi solution was stirred into Al solution to achieve desired Al/Si ratios for each reagent, resulting in pASi for coagulant preparation. PFASiC, produced via co-polymerization, follows OH/Al 1.5, Fe/Si 15, and Al+Fe/Si 10 (PFASiC1.5:15:10). Polyaluminum chloride solutions (PACl-18) were also prepared under identical conditions for comparison, excluding the inclusion of silicates and ferric compounds with OH/Al 1.2. The characterization of simulated surface water was turbidity 17.2 NTU and absorbance UV254nm 0.153. Otherwise, the tanner wastewater had before treatment > 2000 NTU turbidity. Coagulant concentrations ranged from 2–3 mg/L for simulated surface water and 100 mg/L for tanner wastewater, with experiments conducted at pH 7. PSiFAC1.5:10:15 achieved a 97% removal rate, while PACl1.5 showed the highest removal rate of 93% at a dose of 2 mg/L. Similarly, for UV254nm absorbance reduction, PSiFAC1.5:10:15 was the most effective, followed by PFASiC1.5:15:10, especially at concentrations above 2–3 mg/L. Coagulants prepared by composite polymerization were less efficient, as observed in turbidity results. However, PSiFAC1.5:10:15 achieved a 93% UV reduction rate, compared to 78% with PACl1.5. The top-performing coagulants, PSiFAC1.5:10:15, PAFSiC1.5:15:10, and PFASiC1.5:15:10, were used to treat tanner wastewater, significantly reducing turbidity (>99.6%) and absorbance at doses exceeding 100 mg/L [67].
An innovative coagulant, poly–aluminum–ferric–silicate–chloride (PAPEFAC1.5-10-15) was used to eliminate turbidity, COD, and phosphates from the same three different wastewater, referred above [68]. FeCl3 solution were added AlCl3 solution under vigorous stirring. Next, anionic polyelectrolyte (APE) solution were added, followed by the slow addition of base solution. The mixture was stirred for 1 h to mature and then diluted with water to a final concentration of 0.1 M relative to Al. PAPEFAC1.5-10-15 indicates OH/Al:1.5, Al/Fe:10, Al+Fe/APE:15. The removal efficiencies for tanner wastewater were approximately 96% for turbidity, 65% for COD, and less than 65% for phosphates. For yeast wastewater after anaerobic treatment, the removal efficiencies were about 20% for turbidity, 5% for COD, and less than 30% for phosphates. Following additional post-aerobic treatment, yeast wastewater showed removal efficiencies of around 40% for turbidity, 15% for COD, and 57% for phosphates [68].
Two composite inorganic pre-polymerized coagulants were synthesized: PSi-FAC-Na1.5-10-15 (polyaluminum ferric silicate chloride) and PSiFAC-Mg30-10-15 (polyaluminum ferric silicate magnesium) [69]. For the first coagulant, FeCl3 solution was added to AlCl3 solution under vigorous stirring at ratio Al/Fe 10. Then, the pSi solution was introduced to the resulting Fe/Al solution at Al+Fe/Si 15 ratio, followed by the gradual addition of an alkaline solution (NaOH) until reaching the desired pH value (3–3.50) and Al/OH 1.5. Similarly, for the second coagulant, FeCl3 solution was added to an AlCl3 solution under vigorous stirring, followed by the addition of pSi solution. Subsequently, a MgO slurry was slowly added to the mixture until the desired pH value (2–2.5) was achieved. PSiFAC-Mg30-10-15 signifies OH/Al 30, Al/Fe 10, and Al+Fe/Si 15. With an initial fluoride concentration of 5 mg F/L and a coagulant dose of 30 mg Al/L, the uptake capacity (Q1.5-values) to achieve a residual fluoride concentration of 1.5 mg F/L at pH 7.0 was found to be 170 mg F/g Al for PSiFAC-Mg30-10-15 and 94 mg F/g Al for PSiFAC-Na1.5-10-15 [69].
In Table 3, all of the novel synthetic coagulants presented and compared in removal rate in Figure 3. The best removal rates for turbidity had PALS coagulants with approximately 99% [64], after PSiFAC1.5:10:15 in simulated wastewater (97%) [67], and PAPEFAC1.5-10-15 (~96%) [68]. POFC-2 coagulant demonstrated the highest efficiency in removing TSS from domestic wastewater, achieving up to 93% removal and also achieving up to 89% COD removal in domestic wastewater [19].

Inorganic Coagulants with Flocculants Added

Chitosan powder was mixed with HCl solution and stirred until fully dissolved, after which the solution was diluted with distilled water [70]. Vegetable oil refinery wastewater (VORW) contains substantial refractory pollutants that require effective treatment before discharge. This study examines the treatment of VORW using coagulation-flocculation with ferric chloride (FeCl3) as the coagulant and chitosan as the natural flocculant. The removal efficiencies of 3753 NTU turbidity, 7680 mg/L COD, and polyphenols were evaluated. The results indicated that the optimal treatment conditions were a pH of 6, FeCl3 dosage of 1.6 g/L, chitosan dosage of 13.4 mg/L, and an agitation time of 26 min. Under these conditions, 100% turbidity removal, 86% COD reduction, and 90% polyphenol removal were achieved. In the coagulation-flocculation process employed in this study, FeCl3 serves as a coagulant by destabilization of colloidal particles, thereby promoting their aggregation into bigger aggregates. Conversely, chitosan acts as a flocculant, linking particles together to form flocs. The amino groups in chitosan interface with particles via hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic attraction, contributing to the formation of denser and bigger flocs that settle rapidly [70].
In the Table 4 are presented the inorganic coagulant FeCl3 with an organic flocculant chitosan in removing from vegetable oil refinery wastewater turbidity, COD, and polyphenols [70].

4. Organic Coagulants

Chitosan obtained from shrimp shells and having a deacetylation degree of 75% and higher, was employed to treat brewery wastewater with a turbidity of 160 NTU, TOC concentration of 176 mg/L, and an orthophosphate level of 139 mg/L [71]. Under optimal conditions of pH at 8, a dose of 2 g/L, and a contact time of 43 min, the experiments achieved removals of 91% for turbidity, also, 89% for TOC, and for orthophosphates 65% [71].
The cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was purchased [72]. Coagulation/flocculation experiments were carried out with initial concentrations of Cr(III), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) set at 10.4 mg/L, a coagulant dose of 57 mg/L, and a pH value of 10.5. Τhe removal percentages for Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Cd using the CTAB coagulation method are approximately 98%, 92.69%, 96.63%, 99.35%, and 99.52%, respectively [72].
Epichlorohydrin was mixed with diphenylamine at specified epichlorohydrin-diphenylamine molar ratios of 1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1, and 2.5:1 for PE-1, PE-2, PE-3, and PE-4, respectively, by gradual addition into the reactor with continuous stirring to initiate oligomer formation [73]. Following this, 1,2-diaminoethane was incorporated into the mixture at a selected weight percentage (1%) with ongoing stirring. The reaction mixture was maintained at a temperature range of 60–80 °C. After eight hours, the polyamine polymers were obtained in solid form, as depicted in Figure 4 [73].
The sugar industry wastewater displayed turbidity levels of 83 NTU, with total suspended solids (TSS) measured at 1120 mg/L, chemical oxygen demand (COD) at 991 mg/L, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) at 543 mg/L, and a pH value of 6.1. PE-2 demonstrated superior efficacy in removing turbidity compared to other polyelectrolytes. At a dosage of 1.0 mg/L, PE-2 achieved an outstanding result with residual turbidity as low as 1 NTU. In contrast, PE-3 exhibited a lower performance, removing only 87% of turbidity at the same dosage. PE-4 and PE-1 followed in efficacy, with turbidity removal rates of 78.50% and 74.68%, respectively, at a dosage of 2.0 mg/L. Similarly, the sequence of TSS removal mirrors that of turbidity. PE-2 achieved a remarkable 98.40% removal of TSS at a mere dosage of 1.0 mg/L. Meanwhile, TSS removal rates stood at 70.25%, 86.59%, and 75.20%, and for PE-1, PE-3, and PE-4, respectively. PE-2 demonstrated superior efficacy in removing turbidity compared to other polyelectrolytes. At a dosage of 1.0 mg/L, PE-2 achieved an outstanding result with 100% turbidity removal. In contrast, PE-3 exhibited a lower performance, removing only 87% of turbidity at the same dosage. PE-1 and PE-4 followed in efficacy, with turbidity removal rates of 74.68% and 78.50%, respectively, at a dosage of 2.0 mg/L. The removal of COD and BOD follows the sequence of PE-2 > PE-3 > PE-1 > PE-4, indicating that PE-2 exhibits the highest efficiency in removing both pollutants. At a dosage of 1.5 mg/L, PE-2 achieved remarkable removal rates of 94.5% for COD and 95.2% for BOD. In comparison, PE-3 removed 82.25% of COD and 79.52% of BOD under similar conditions. However, the performance of PE-1 and PE-4 was less satisfactory, with COD removal rates of 72.48% and 65.36%, respectively, and BOD removal rates of 71.47% and 63.67%, respectively. This disparity in performance may be attributed to the lower charge density of PE-1 and PE-4. Typically, polyelectrolytes carry higher charges, leading to enhanced adsorption of suspended particles through electrostatic attraction between positively and negatively charged ionic groups. The removal pattern of oil, and grease mirrors that of COD and BOD [73].
Table 5 summarizes all novel organic coagulants such as chitosan, CTAB, PE-1, PE-2, PE-3, and PE-4 for wastewater treatment. Figure 5 makes a comparison was made regarding the effectiveness of novel organic coagulants in removing turbidity, BOD, COD, and TSS. PE-2 stands out for its effectiveness in removing turbidity, TSS, COD, and BOD from sugar industry wastewater [73], while chitosan is particularly effective for TOC and orthophosphate removal in brewery wastewater [71]. It is notable CTAB is highly effective for the removal of various toxic metal ions in wastewater [72].

5. Hybrid Coagulants/Flocculants

3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane was used as the Si source to prepare organic silica hybrid coagulants (PAAP) [74]. To obtain defined Si/Al molar ratios of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8, a mixture of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, AlCl3 solution, and water was prepared. Subsequently, NaOH solution was gradually introduced with continuous stirring to achieve the desired B values (basicity, OH/Al molar ratios) of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2.0. After aging for 24 h, ethanol was removed by vacuum rotary evaporation at 30 °C. The coagulant solutions were then diluted to the same final Al concentration. The hybrid coagulants were labeled PAAP, with designations like PAAP0.1,0.5 indicating a Si/Al ratio of 0.1 and a B value of 0.5. The two types of wastewaters were raw coking wastewater, characterized by pH 9.98, 105 NTU turbidity, 4654 mg/L COD, 1138.45 mg/L DOC, and 22.75 UV254nm, and biologically treated coking wastewater, characterized by pH value of 8.13, 128 NTU turbidity, 109.03 mg/L COD, 41.86 mg/L DOC, and 2.197 UV254nm. The optimal dosage for treating raw coking wastewater was determined to be 600 mg/L. At this dosage, the removal efficiencies were 82.05% for turbidity, 12.09% for UV254nm, 9.34% for DOC, and 24.16% for COD. The optimal dosage for treating biologically treated coking wastewater was determined to be 300 mg/L. At this dosage, the removal efficiency for turbidity was 97.84%, for UV254nm it was 37.72%, for DOC it was 29.97%, and for COD it was 63.39% [74].
Various inorganic-organic hybrids were prepared with PANS as the base product. PANS is a commercial polyaluminum nitrate sulfate featuring an intermediate aluminum content of 5.5% and a basicity of 46%., containing 16.0% NO3 and 3.0% SO42−. The hybrids were created by directly blending PANS with three different polyamines, each varying in molecular weight, at room temperature. The molecular weights of the polyamines followed the order: PA1 < PA2 < PA3. Four different addition levels were tested for each type of polyamine: 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% by weight of commercial solutions (48–52% dry solids), with the remainder being PANS. Higher polyamine contents were also prepared, but these blends proved unstable, as indicated by the appearance of turbidity within 24 h of preparation. Additionally, PANS was tested alone to assess its efficiency relative to the hybrid materials. The hybrids are denoted as PANS-PAx-Z, where PAx represents the specific polyamine (PA1, PA2, or PA3) and Z indicates the polyamine weight content in the hybrid. The hybrid coagulants were categorized by their aluminum content and cationic charge according to the concentration of the commercial polyamine solution used. All the hybrids and PANS were tested together with the same flocculant: an anionic polyacrylamide with high molecular weight and medium charge. The effluent undergoes a treatment process that includes primary treatment via dissolved air flotation, followed by secondary treatment in a moving bed bioreactor, and another round of dissolved air flotation. Water samples from the final effluent, taken before discharge to an urban wastewater treatment plant, showed the following characteristics: raw water had a turbidity of 11.4 NTU, total solids concentration of 1990 mg/L, cationic demand of 0.52 meq/L, and in the dissolved fraction, total solids were 1890 mg/L. Additionally, the chemical oxygen demand (COD) was 256 mg/L, silica (SiO2) content was 145 mg/L, calcium concentration was 33.7 mg/L, and magnesium concentration was 2.8 mg/L. The efficacy of various PANS-PA1 hybrids in silica removal varied slightly, achieving maximum removal rates of approximately 47% with PANS-PA1-20 at a dosage of 2500 mg/L. Similar efficiencies around 40% were observed with other PA1 hybrids at different dosages: 1000 mg/L for PANS-PA1-5, 1500 mg/L for PANS-PA1-10, and 2000 mg/L for PANS-PA1-15. Under initial pH conditions of 8.4, PANS-PA2 hybrids demonstrated slightly higher silica removal efficiencies compared to PANS-PA1, reaching about 50% with PANS-PA2-5 and PANS-PA2-10 at 2500 mg/L. At a lower dosage of 500 mg/L, silica removal ranged from 39% with PANS-PA2-5 to 23% with PANS-PA2-20, showing significant enhancement compared to PANS alone. Silica removal efficiencies with PANS-PA3 hybrids were slightly lower than with PA2 but higher than with PA1 hybrids. Maximum removal rates ranged from 51% with PANS-PA3-5 to 40% with PANS-PA3-20 at a dosage of 2500 mg/L. Notably, PANS-PA3-5 achieved 42% silica removal at 500 mg/L, compared to only 12% with PANS alone at the same dosage. Conversely, removal rates were lower with 20% PA3 compared to the other hybrids. At an initial pH of 10.5, silica removal increased consistently with coagulant dosage due to increased ionization of silica and greater availability of alkalinity for aluminum hydroxide formation, which are active species in coagulation. Differences in silica removal rates between hybrids and PANS were less pronounced at pH 10.5 compared to pH 8.4. Molecular weight of polyamine or percentage in the hybrids showed no significant effect. PANS alone achieved high removal rates, including 90% at 2500 mg/L and 71% and 83% at lower dosages of 1500 mg/L and 2000 mg/L, respectively. For hybrids, removal rates ranged approximately from 50% to 90% across various dosages tested. At 500 mg/L, removal efficiency varied notably, from 16% with PANS-PA3-20 to 31% with PANS-PA2-5, whereas PANS alone achieved 14% removal [75].
Initially, an HCl solution (10–30% w/w) and an H2SO4 solution (10–20% w/w) were added to a conical flask containing galvanized aluminum slag, which had been crushed into smaller, irregular pieces. This mixture was subjected to leaching for 1–5 h in a water bath constant temperature oscillator at 70–90 °C to obtain a leachate. The leachate was then filtered at 30–40 °C to produce a colorless filtrate. Subsequently, a specific concentration of PAM solution was added to the colorless filtrate either before or after polymerization. Following this, an NaOH solution (0.5–5.0% w/w) was slowly introduced into the mixture to facilitate polymerization for 2–48 h at 60–80 °C with continuous stirring, resulting in a liquid product of PPAZF with a pH of 2.5–3.5 [76]. This liquid PPAZF was then used in subsequent coagulation tests. The quality indicators for domestic sewage were as follows: turbidity was 232 NTU, COD was 661.51 mg/L, and pH was 7.71. In contrast, the quality indicators for pharmaceutical wastewater were: turbidity was 265 NTU, COD was 10,025 mg/L, and pH was 4.84. The rapid mixing was carried out at 200 rpm for 1 min. This was followed by a slow mixing stage at 60 rpm for 10 min to form dense and large microflocs. Finally, a sedimentation stage was conducted for 15 min. The removal achieved with initial coagulant dosage 148 mg/L (Al concentration). For domestic sewage, the removal efficiencies were approximately 98% for turbidity and 96% for COD. For pharmaceutical wastewater, the removal efficiencies were about 73% for turbidity and 47% for COD. Throughout the coagulation process, four mechanisms contribute significantly: electrical neutralization, compressed double electric layer, adsorption bridging, and sweep function. Specifically, the coagulation mechanism of PPAZF involves not only the binding and electrical neutralization of impurities and hydrolyzed forms of aluminum, zinc, and iron, but also entails the formation of complex precipitates due to the hydrolysis products of metals interacting with organic matter [76].
In Table 6 are illustrated the hybrid coagulants used for wastewater treatment. PAAP achieved significant turbidity removal for both raw and biologically treated coking wastewaters, with removal rates up to 97.84% and 82.05% respectively, compared to PANS-PAx hybrids which reached up to 90% and 50% silica removal at optimal dosages [75,76]. Domestic sewage showed higher removal rates with PPAZF (98% turbidity, 96% COD) compared to pharmaceutical wastewater (73% turbidity, 47% COD), indicating varying treatment requirements based on wastewater composition and characteristics [76].

6. Conclusions

In summary, coagulation/flocculation are processes aimed at efficiently removing turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), toxic metals, phosphates, and UV254nm from wastewater. Natural, inorganic, and organic coagulants can be utilized either independently or in combination with flocculants.
Among natural coagulants, Crab Shell Bio-Coagulant (CS) emerges as the most effective in turbidity removal, achieving a remarkable 98.91% removal rate. Oak leaves protein exhibits superior performance in removing TSS and COD concentrations.
In contrast, synthetic inorganic coagulants like PALS, PSiFAC1.5:10:15, and PAPEFAC1.5-10-15 demonstrate exceptional turbidity removal rates, reaching approximately 99%, 97%, and 96% respectively. POFC-2 coagulant stands out for its efficiency in removing TSS and COD from domestic wastewater, achieving up to 93% removal for TSS and 89% for COD.
Additionally, the combination of FeCl3 as an inorganic coagulant and chitosan as an organic flocculant shows promise in removing turbidity, COD, and polyphenols from vegetable oil refinery wastewater.
Among the novel organic coagulants, PE-2 exhibits remarkable effectiveness in removing turbidity, TSS, COD, and BOD from sugar industry wastewater, while chitosan demonstrates efficacy in TOC and orthophosphate removal in brewery wastewater. CTAB proves highly effective in removing various toxic metal ions from wastewater.
Furthermore, the hybrid coagulants PAAP0.1,0.5 and PPAZF achieve outstanding removal of turbidity, approximately 98%. At pH 10.5, PANS-PA1, PANS-PA2, and PANS-PA3 demonstrated superior silica removal compared to their performance at pH 8.4.
Overall, these findings underscore the diverse applications and effectiveness of different coagulants in treating various types of wastewaters, offering valuable insights for wastewater treatment strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K.; methodology, A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K.; validation, A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K.; formal analysis, E.K.T., A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K.; investigation, E.K.T., A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K.; resources, E.K.T., A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K.; data curation, E.K.T. and A.K.T.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K.T. and A.K.T.; writing—review and editing, E.K.T., A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K.; visualization, A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K.; supervision, A.K.T., G.Z.K. and I.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support of this work by the project “Advanced Nanostructured Materials for Sustainable Growth: Green Energy Production/Storage, Energy Saving and Environmental Remediation” (TAEDR-0535821) which is implemented under the ac-tion “Flagship actions in interdisciplinary scientific fields with a special focus on the productive fabric” (ID 16618), Greece 2.0—National Recovery and Resilience Fund and funded by European Union NextGenerationEU.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Naraghi, B.; Baneshi, M.M.; Amiri, R.; Dorost, A.; Biglari, H. Removal of Reactive Black 5 Dye from Aqueous Solutions by Coupled Electrocoagulation and Bio-Adsorbent Process. Electron. Physician 2018, 10, 7086–7094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tolkou, A.K.; Mitropoulos, A.C.; Kyzas, G.Z. Removal of Anthraquinone Dye from Wastewaters by Hybrid Modified Activated Carbons. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 73688–73701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tolkou, A.K.; Tsoutsa, E.K.; Kyzas, G.Z.; Katsoyiannis, I.A. Sustainable Use of Low-Cost Adsorbents Prepared from Waste Fruit Peels for the Removal of Selected Reactive and Basic Dyes Found in Wastewaters. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 14662–14689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hoong, H.N.J.; Ismail, N. Removal of Dye in Wastewater by Adsorption-Coagulation Combined System with Hibiscus Sabdariffa as the Coagulant. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, 9th International Engineering Research Conference (Eureca 2017), Selango, Malaysia, 6 December 2017; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2018; Volume 152. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, L.; Luo, X.B.; Ding, L.; Luo, S.L. Application of Nanotechnology in the Removal of Heavy Metal from Water; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; ISBN 9780128148389. [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Tayawi, A.N.; Sisay, E.J.; Beszédes, S.; Kertész, S. Wastewater Treatment in the Dairy Industry from Classical Treatment to Promising Technologies: An Overview. Processes 2023, 11, 2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Panda, S.K.; Aggarwal, I.; Kumar, H.; Prasad, L.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, A.; Vo, D.V.N.; Van Thuan, D.; Mishra, V. Magnetite Nanoparticles as Sorbents for Dye Removal: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 2487–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, F.; Mu, B.; Zhang, T.; Dong, C.; Zhu, Y.; Zong, L.; Wang, A. Synthesis of Biochar/Clay Mineral Nanocomposites Using Oil Shale Semi-Coke Waste for Removal of Organic Pollutants. Biochar 2023, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yuan, J.; Li, S.; Ding, Z.; Li, J.; Yu, A.; Wen, S.; Bai, S. Treatment Technology and Research Progress of Residual Xanthate in Mineral Processing Wastewater. Minerals 2023, 13, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wantoputri, N.I.; Notodarmojo, S.; Helmy, Q. Reactive Black-5 Removal by Ozonation as Post Treatment. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; Institute of Physics; International Conference on Science and Innovated Engineering (I-COSINE), Aceh, Indonesia, 21–22 October 2018; IOP Science: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 536. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Da, Y.; Xie, F.; Wang, J. Advanced Treatment of Landfill Leachate Using Integrated Coagulation/Photo-Fenton Process through in-Situ Generated Nascent Al3+ and H2O2 by Cl, N Co-Doped Aluminum-Graphite Composite. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 304, 121003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meng, R.; Liu, L.; Su, X.; Gong, W.; Luo, X.; Gao, H. Facile Preparation of Cellulose Beads with Tunable Graded Pores and High Mechanical Strength. Polymers 2024, 16, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hadadi, A.; Imessaoudene, A.; Bollinger, J.C.; Cheikh, S.; Assadi, A.A.; Amrane, A.; Kebir, M.; Mouni, L. Parametrical Study for the Effective Removal of Mordant Black 11 from Synthetic Solutions: Moringa Oleifera Seeds’ Extracts Versus Alum. Water 2022, 14, 4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Daud, Z.; Awang, H.; Latif, A.A.A.; Nasir, N.; Ridzuan, M.B.; Ahmad, Z. Suspended Solid, Color, COD and Oil and Grease Removal from Biodiesel Wastewater by Coagulation and Flocculation Processes. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 2407–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Azamzam, A.A.; Rafatullah, M.; Yahya, E.B.; Ahmad, M.I.; Lalung, J.; Alam, M.; Siddiqui, M.R. Enhancing the Efficiency of Banana Peel Bio-Coagulant in Turbid and River Water Treatment Applications. Water 2022, 14, 2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tsoutsa, E.K.; Tolkou, A.K.; Kyzas, G.Z.; Katsoyiannis, I.A. An Update on Agricultural Wastes Used as Natural Adsorbents or Coagulants in Single or Combined Systems for the Removal of Dyes from Wastewater. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2024, 235, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gomes, J.; Domingues, E.; Fernandes, E.; Castro, L.; Martins, R.C.; Quinta-Ferreira, R.M. Coagulation and Biofiltration by Corbicula Fluminea for COD and Toxicity Reduction of Swine Wastewater. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 42, 102145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Youssef, M.; El-Tanany, S.S.; Moatasim, Y.; Moniem, S.M.A.; Hemdan, B.A.; Ammar, N.S.; El-Taweel, G.E.; Ashmawy, A.M.; Badawy, M.I.; Lasheen, M.R.; et al. Assessment of Toxicity and Antimicrobial Performance of Polymeric Inorganic Coagulant and Evaluation for Eutrophication Reduction. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ali, M.E.M.; Moniem, S.M.A.; Hemdan, B.A.; Ammar, N.S.; Ibrahim, H.S. Innovative Polymeric Inorganic Coagulant-Flocculant for Wastewater Purification with Simultaneous Microbial Reduction in Treated Effluent and Sludge. South African J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 42, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zaharia, C.; Musteret, C.-P.; Afrasinei, M.-A. The Use of Coagulation–Flocculation for Industrial Colored Wastewater Treatment—(I) The Application of Hybrid Materials. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ozdemir, N.C.; Yel, E. Synthesis of a New Flocculant from Waste Polystyrene: Plastic Recycling Industry Wastewater Treatability. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2023, 234, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, H.; Zhang, H.; Sun, C.; Yuan, W.; Li, H.; Jiang, W.; Dong, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H. Preparation of Inorganic–Organic Composite Coagulant and Its Mechanism in Destroying Emulsified Oil in Oilfield Sewage. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 330, 125446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yan, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, H.; Yang, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, C.; Wang, D. Effect of Surface Functional Groups of Polystyrene Micro/Nano Plastics on the Release of NOM from Flocs during the Aging Process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 472, 134421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wimalaweera, I.P.; Wei, Y.; Ritigala, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, H.; Weerasooriya, R.; Jinadasa, S.; Weragoda, S. Enhanced Pretreatment of Natural Rubber Industrial Wastewater Using Magnetic Seed Coagulation with Ca(OH)2. Water 2024, 16, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ribeiro, T.; Ladeia Janz, F.J.; Vizibelli, D.; Borges, J.C.Â.; Borssoi, J.A.; Fukumoto, A.A.F.; Bergamasco, R.; Ueda Yamaguchi, N.; Pereira, E.R. Magnetic Natural Coagulants for Plastic Recycling Industry Wastewater Treatability. Water 2023, 15, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rumky, J.; Bandina, E.; Repo, E. Behavior of Sludge Dewaterability and Nutrient Contents after Treatment with Cellulose-Based Flocculants with Combined PTS and Catalytic Behavior of Sludge towards Tetracycline Degradation. Resources 2023, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiang, Z.; Huang, C.; Huang, J.; Yan, Y.; Liu, G.; Yu, X.; Liu, W.; Cao, H.; Liu, A. Mechanism for the Synergistic Removal of Sb(III) and Sb(V) from Printing and Dyeing Wastewater by Polyferric Sulfate. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tsoutsa, E.K.; Tolkou, A.K.; Katsoyiannis, I.A.; Kyzas, G.Z. Composite Activated Carbon Modified with AlCl3 for the Effective Removal of Reactive Black 5 Dye from Wastewaters. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahmad, A.; Kurniawan, S.B.; Ahmad, J.; Alias, J.; Marsidi, N.; Said, N.S.M.; Yusof, A.S.M.; Buhari, J.; Ramli, N.N.; Rahim, N.F.M.; et al. Dosage-Based Application versus Ratio-Based Approach for Metal- and Plant-Based Coagulants in Wastewater Treatment: Merits, Limitations, and Applicability. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 334, 130245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jin, Y.; Chen, F.; Xu, B.; Ma, G.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Liu, R.; Sun, C.; Cheng, X.; Guo, N.; et al. Iron-Based Technology Coupling Moderate Preoxidation with Hybrid Coagulation for Highly Effective Removal and Moderate Growth Inhibition of Oscillatoria in Drinking Water Treatment Plants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sahu, J.N.; Kapelyushin, Y.; Mishra, D.P.; Ghosh, P.; Sahoo, B.K.; Trofimov, E.; Meikap, B.C. Utilization of Ferrous Slags as Coagulants, Filters, Adsorbents, Neutralizers/Stabilizers, Catalysts, Additives, and Bed Materials for Water and Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Chemosphere 2023, 325, 138201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, Z.; Long, Y.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhu, G. Preparation and Application of Polymeric Silicate Coagulant: A Short Review. Environ. Eng. Res. 2024, 29, 230672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, L.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Huang, X.; Luan, Z.; Tang, W.; Xu, Z.; Xu, W. Suitability of Inorganic Coagulants for Algae-Laden Water Treatment: Trade-off between Algae Removal and Cell Viability, Aggregate Properties and Coagulant Residue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 471, 134314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shamira Shaharom, M.; Siti Quraisyah Abg Adenan, D. Potential of Orange Peel as a Coagulant for Water Treatment. Infrastruct. Univ. Kuala Lumpur Res. J. 2019, 7, 63–72. [Google Scholar]
  35. Santos, L.d.L.C.d.; Silva, J.B.M.; Neves, L.S.; Renato, N.d.S.; Moltó, J.; Conesa, J.A.; Borges, A.C. Life Cycle Assessment of a Vegetable Tannin-Based Agent Production for Waters Treatment. Water 2024, 16, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tomasi, I.T.; Machado, C.A.; Boaventura, R.A.R.; Botelho, C.M.S.; Santos, S.C.R. Tannin-Based Coagulants: Current Development and Prospects on Synthesis and Uses. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 822, 153454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tolkou, A.K.; Tsoutsa, E.K.; Katsoyiannis, I.A.; Kyzas, G.Z. Simultaneous Removal of Anionic and Cationic Dyes on Quaternary Mixtures by Adsorption onto Banana, Orange and Pomegranate Peels. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 685, 133176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Garcés-Gómez, Y.A.; Pacheco-Gonzalez, S.I. Method for Extraction and Evaluation of Heliocarpus Popayanensis and Triumfetta Bogotensis as Natural Coagulants for the Treatment of Wastewater. Methods Protoc. 2023, 6, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ben-David, E.A.; Habibi, M.; Haddad, E.; Sammar, M.; Angel, D.L.; Dror, H.; Lahovitski, H.; Booth, A.M.; Sabbah, I. Mechanism of Nanoplastics Capture by Jellyfish Mucin and Its Potential as a Sustainable Water Treatment Technology. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 869, 161824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kristianto, H.; Angelina Kurniawan, M.; M Soetedjo, J.N. Utilization of Papaya Seeds as Natural Coagulant for Synthetic Textile Coloring Agent Wastewater Treatment. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2018, 8, 2071–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abujazar, M.S.S.; Karaağaç, S.U.; Abu Amr, S.S.; Alazaiza, M.Y.D.; Fatihah, S.; Bashir, M.J.K. Recent Advancements in Plant-Based Natural Coagulant Application in the Water and Wastewater Coagulation-Flocculation Process: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Glob. Nest J. 2022, 24, 687–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abujazar, M.S.S.; Karaağaç, S.U.; Abu Amr, S.S.; Alazaiza, M.Y.D.; Bashir, M.J. Recent Advancement in the Application of Hybrid Coagulants in Coagulation-Flocculation of Wastewater: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 345, 131133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cui, H.; Huang, X.; Yu, Z.; Chen, P.; Cao, X. Application Progress of Enhanced Coagulation in Water Treatment. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 20231–20244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ang, W.L.; Mohammad, A.W. State of the Art and Sustainability of Natural Coagulants in Water and Wastewater Treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sibiya, N.P.; Amo-Duodu, G.; Tetteh, E.K.; Rathilal, S. Magnetic Field Effect on Coagulation Treatment of Wastewater Using Magnetite Rice Starch and Aluminium Sulfate. Polymers 2023, 15, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mohammed, R.R.; Ketabachi, M.R.; McKay, G. Combined Magnetic Field and Adsorption Process for Treatment of Biologically Treated Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME). Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 243, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ahmad, A.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Hasan, H.A.; Othman, A.R.; Kurniawan, S.B. Aquaculture Wastewater Treatment Using Plant-Based Coagulants: Evaluating Removal Efficiency through the Coagulation-Flocculation Process. Results Chem. 2024, 7, 101390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nouj, N.; Majbar, Z.; Abelouah, M.R.; Ben Hamou, A.; Chaoui, A.; Hafid, N.; Benafqir, M.; El Alem, N.; Jada, A.; Ouachtak, H.; et al. Eco-Friendly Wastewater Treatment Using a Crab Shell-Based Liquid Bio-Coagulant: Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Related to Different Pollutants Separation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Benalia, A.; Chaibraa, W.; Djeghar, S.; Derbal, K.; Khalfaoui, A.; Mahfouf, A.; Bouchareb, R.; Panico, A.; Pizzi, A. Use of Extracted Proteins from Oak Leaves as Bio-Coagulant for Water and Wastewater Treatment: Optimization by a Fractional Factorial Design. Water 2023, 15, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Elsergany, M. The Potential Use of Moringa Peregrina Seeds and Seed Extract as a Bio-Coagulant for Water Purification. Water 2023, 15, 2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Otálora, M.C.; Wilches-Torres, A.; Lara, C.R.; Díaz-Gómez, J.; Gómez Castaño, J.A.; Cifuentes, G.R. Assessment of Prickly Pear Fruit Peel Mucilage in Form of Gel as a Green Coagulant for the Tertiary Treatment of Domestic Wastewater. Gels 2023, 9, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gomes, A.; Jorge, N.; Teixeira, A.; Peres, J.A.; Lucas, M.S. Cattle Wastewater Treatment Using Almond Hull and Cherry Pit as Coagulants–Flocculants. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. El Gaayda, J.; Titchou, F.E.; Barra, I.; Karmal, I.; Afanga, H.; Zazou, H.; Yap, P.S.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Hamdani, M.; Akbour, R.A. Optimization of Turbidity and Dye Removal from Synthetic Wastewater Using Response Surface Methodology: Effectiveness of Moringa Oleifera Seed Powder as a Green Coagulant. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 106988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Naruka, A.K.; Suganya, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Amit, C.; Ankita, K.; Bhatt, D.; Kumar, M.A. Kinetic Modelling of High Turbid Water Flocculation Using Native and Surface Functionalized Coagulants Prepared from Shed-Leaves of Avicennia Marina Plants. Chemosphere 2021, 272, 129894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ovuoraye, P.E.; Okpala, L.C.; Ugonabo, V.I.; Nwokocha, G.F. Clarification Efficacy of Eggshell and Aluminum Base Coagulant for the Removal of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) from Cosmetics Wastewater by Coag-Flocculation. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 4759–4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vijayavenkataraman, S.; Iniyan, S.; Goic, R. A Review of Solar Drying Technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2652–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Benalia, A.; Derbal, K.; Khalfaoui, A.; Bouchareb, R.; Panico, A.; Gisonni, C.; Crispino, G.; Pirozzi, F.; Pizzi, A. Use of Aloe Vera as an Organic Coagulant for Improving Drinking Water Quality. Water 2021, 13, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aziz, A.; Agamuthu, P.; Hassan, A.; Auta, H.S.; Fauziah, S.H. Green Coagulant from Dillenia Indica for Removal of Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate and Phenol, 4,4’-(1-Methylethylidene)Bis- from Landfill Leachate. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 102061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kumar, V.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Asharuddin, S.M.; Othman, N. Potential of Cassava Peels as a Sustainable Coagulant Aid for Institutional Wastewater Treatment: Characterisation, Optimisation and Techno-Economic Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 127642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mauricio, M.; Flores, A.; Emmanuel, O.; Miranda, R.; Andr, N.; Omar, S. Evaluation of the Potential of a Biocoagulant Produced from Prickly Pear Peel Waste Valorization for Wastewater Treatment. Water 2024, 16, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xu, H.; Wei, S.; Li, G.; Guo, B. Advanced Removal of Phosphorus from Urban Sewage Using Chemical Precipitation by Fe-Al Composite Coagulants. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, J.; Chang, F.; Zheng, M. Advanced Treatment of Coking Wastewater by Polyaluminum Silicate Sulfate for Organic Compounds Removal. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Youssef, H.H.; Younis, S.A.; El-Fawal, E.M.; Ali, H.R.; Moustafa, Y.M.; Mohamed, G.G. Synthesis of Polyaluminum Chloride Coagulant from Waste Aluminum Foil and Utilization in Petroleum Wastewater Treatment. Separations 2023, 10, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. He, J.; Song, Q.; He, J. Preparation and Coagulation Performance of Polyaluminum Lanthanum Silicate Coagulant. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Du, Z.; Gong, Z.; Qi, W.; Li, E.; Shen, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, H. Coagulation Performance and Floc Characteristics of Poly-Ferric-Titanium-Silicate-Chloride in Coking Wastewater Treatment. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 642, 128413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yue, Y.; An, G.; Lin, L.; Demissie, H.; Yang, X.; Jiao, R.; Wang, D. Design and Coagulation Mechanism of a New Functional Composite Coagulant in Removing Humic Acid. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 292, 121016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tolkou, A.K.; Zouboulis, A.I.; Samaras, P.E. Synthesis and Coagulation Performance of Composite Poly-Aluminum-Ferric-Silicate-Chloride Coagulants in Water and Wastewater Treatment and Their Potentially Use to Alleviate the Membrane Fouling in MBRs. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 53, 3309–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tolkou, A.K.; Zouboulis, A.I. Application of Composite Pre-Polymerized Coagulants for the Treatment of High-Strength Industrial Wastewaters. Water 2020, 12, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tolkou, A.K.; Mitrakas, M.; Katsoyiannis, I.A.; Ernst, M.; Zouboulis, A.I. Fluoride Removal from Water by Composite Al/Fe/Si/Mg Pre-Polymerized Coagulants: Characterization and Application. Chemosphere 2019, 231, 528–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Hartal, O.; Madinzi, A.; Khattabi Rifi, S.; Haddaji, C.; Agustiono Kurniawan, T.; Anouzla, A.; Souabi, S. Optimization of Coagulation-Flocculation Process for Wastewater Treatment from Vegetable Oil Refineries Using Chitosan as a Natural Flocculant. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2024, 22, 100957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Khumalo, S.M.; Bakare, B.F.; Tetteh, E.K.; Rathilal, S. Application of Response Surface Methodology on Brewery Wastewater Treatment Using Chitosan as a Coagulant. Water 2023, 15, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, N.; Qian, J.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, B. Cationic Surfactant-Mediated Coagulation for Enhanced Removal of Toxic Metal-Organic Complexes: Performance, Mechanism, and Validation. ACS EST Eng. 2022, 2, 895–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jabin, S.; Kapoor, J.K.; Jadoun, S.; Chandna, N.; Chauhan, N.P.S. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyamine-Based Polyelectrolytes for Wastewater Treatment in the Sugar Industry. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1275, 134573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, S.; Li, E.; Li, J.; Du, Z.; Cheng, F. Preparation and Coagulation-Flocculation Performance of Covalently Bound Organic Hybrid Coagulant with Excellent Stability. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 600, 124966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Latour, I.; Miranda, R.; Carceller, R.; Blanco, A. Efficiency of Polyaluminum Nitrate Sulfate–Polyamine Hybrid Coagulants for Silica Removal. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 17973–17984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, Y.Z.; Fu, Y.; Su, M.M.; Cai, S.S.; Chen, Q.F. Coagulation Performance of Organic Modified Poly-Polyacrylamide-Al-Zn-Fe (PPAZF) Coagulant. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 848, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Classification of coagulants and examples.
Figure 1. Classification of coagulants and examples.
Macromol 04 00030 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of novel natural coagulants as per removal rate for turbidity, TSS, and COD.
Figure 2. Comparison of novel natural coagulants as per removal rate for turbidity, TSS, and COD.
Macromol 04 00030 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of novel inorganic coagulants as per removal rate for turbidity, COD, and TSS.
Figure 3. Comparison of novel inorganic coagulants as per removal rate for turbidity, COD, and TSS.
Macromol 04 00030 g003
Figure 4. Polyelectrolyte synthesis [73].
Figure 4. Polyelectrolyte synthesis [73].
Macromol 04 00030 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of novel organic coagulants as per removal rate for turbidity, BOD, COD, and TSS.
Figure 5. Comparison of novel organic coagulants as per removal rate for turbidity, BOD, COD, and TSS.
Macromol 04 00030 g005
Table 1. Novel natural coagulants for wastewater treatment.
Table 1. Novel natural coagulants for wastewater treatment.
CoagulantsRemoveInitial ConditionspHCoagulant DosageRemovalRef.
MS 1Rice Starch-Containing Effluent11.78 NTU turbidity7.2300 mg/L86.00% turbidity[45]
85.00% TSS
73 mg/L COD55.00% COD
MS 1 with magnetic exposure88.00% turbidity
6.5 mg/L TSS87.00% TSS
56.00% COD
PBC 2General Wastewater392.67–657.33 NTU turbidity7.13–7.210.79 mg/L85.17% turbidity [47]
711.00–727.33 mg/L COD54.63% COD
776–876 mg/L TSS80.28% TSS
1736–1789 ADM Color59.42% Color
CS 3 bio-coagulantFish Processing Wastewater (FPW)>1000 NTU Turbidity11.331.6 mL/L98.91% turbidity[48]
3735 mg O2/L COD78.92% COD
2345.5 mg O2/L BOD592.05% BOD5
oak leaves proteinIndustrial Oily Wastewater187 NTU Turbidity120.538 mg/L96.87% turbidity[49]
969 mg/L COD96.39% COD
784.45 mg/L TSS89.86% TSS
MPDOEx 4Synthetic water99.1 NTU Turbidity9400 mg/L81.00% Turbidity[50]
188 mg/L COD38.00% COD
71.8 mg/L Mo 200 mg/L97.40% Mo
8.1 mg/L Cu66.50% Cu
2.1 mg/L Cd51.80% Cd
11.0 mg/L Cr50.30% Cr
3.1 mg/L Co45.80% Co
10.1 mg/L Mn12.00% Mn
3.8 mg/L Ni10.50% Ni
PP 5 fruit peel mucilage gelDomestic Wastewater88 NTU Turbidity1312 mg/L94.00% turbidity[51]
671 TCU color85.00% color
Almond hull (Prunus dulcis)Cattle Wastewater7207 NTU turbidity 30.1 g/L38.30% turbidity [52]
39.10% COD
21178 mg O2/L COD52.90% TSS
cherry pit (Prunus avium)88.80% turbidity
6930 mg/L TSS42.40% COD
22.30% TSS
MOSP 6Synthetic WastewaterTurbidity 6.930.34 mg/L98.50% turbidity[53]
7.88 mg/L Amido Black 10B dye92.20% Amido Black 10B
AMC 7Starch wastewater16.36 NTU turbidity7.901.0 g/L89.88% turbidity[54]
Mud Wastewater15.15 NTU turbidity7.8289.74% turbidity
HCl treated AMC 7Starch wastewater16.36 NTU turbidity7.9096.77% turbidity
Mud Wastewater15.15 NTU turbidity7.8295.87% turbidity
NaOH treated AMC 7Starch wastewater16.36 NTU turbidity7.9096.90% turbidity
Mud Wastewater15.15 NTU turbidity7.8294.73% turbidity
NaCl treated AMC 7Starch wastewater16.36 NTU turbidity7.9089.87% turbidity
Mud Wastewater15.15 NTU turbidity7.8294.66% turbidity
EC 8-232 mg/L TSS60.2 g/L85.00% TSS[55]
AV 9-powderGeneral Wastewater13 NTU turbidity610 mg/L28.23% turbidity[57]
AV 9-H2O7.50.1 mL/L87.84% turbidity
Dillenia indicaLeachate31 mg/L Bisphenol A8.51066 mg/L60.00% Bisphenol A[58]
15 mg/L DEHP958 mg/L55.00% DEHP
CPS 10Water with Initial Turbidity, TSS, and COD194 NTU turbidity6.0448.58 mg/L60.19% turbidity[59]
57.79% TSS
284 mg/L TSS30.19% COD
CPS 10:alum (4:1)8.080% of CPS
20% of alum
77.48% turbidity
296.248 mg/L COD77.34% TSS
56.89% COD
1 MS: Magnetic rice starch, 2 PBC: plant-based coagulants, 3 CS: Crab shells, 4 MPDOEx: Moringa peregrina raw crushed seed extract after oil removal, 5 PP: Prickly pear, 6 MOSP: Moringa oleifera seeds powder, 7 AMC, 8 ESC: Eggshell Coagulant, 9 AV: Aloe vera, 10 CPS: Cassava peel starch.
Table 2. Novel natural coagulants in combination with flocculants for wastewater treatment.
Table 2. Novel natural coagulants in combination with flocculants for wastewater treatment.
CoagulantFlocculantInitial ConditionspHCoagulant Dosage (mg/L)Flocculant Dosage (mg/L)RemovalRef.
Prickly pear peel wasteAnionic polymer45.39 NTU Turbidity4100176.10% turbidity[60]
7.825051.70% turbidity
30% prickly pear peel waste and 70% aluminum sulfate58.10% turbidity
Table 3. Inorganic novel coagulants for wastewater treatment.
Table 3. Inorganic novel coagulants for wastewater treatment.
CoagulantsRemoveInitial ConditionspHCoagulant DosageRemovalRef.
POFC-1 1Domestic Wastewater86 NTU turbidity6–810 mg/L78.00% turbidity[19]
67.00% COD
342 mg/L COD82.00% TSS
POFC-2 292.00% turbidity
300 mg/L TSS89.00% COD
93.00% TSS
PFS 3printing and dyeing wastewater1 mg/L Sb560 mg/L95.00% Sb(III),
90.00% Sb(V)
[27]
0.085 mg/L Sb(III), and 0.1 mg/L Sb(V)97.50% total Sb
FeCl3–AlCl3 40.519 mg/L Total P521.85 mg/L91.31% Total P[61]
FeSO4–Al2(SO4)3 5715 mg/L86.82% Total P
PASS 6Coking Wastewater196.67 mg/L CODCr7.07 mmol/L69.50% CODCr[62]
PACl 7Domestic Wastewater270 NTU turbidity6.525 mg/L98.00% turbidity [63]
100 mg/L DOC69.80% DOC
PALS 8Simulate Wastewater28.6–30.2 NTU Turbidity812 mg/L99.00% turbidity[64]
2 mg/L total phosphorus68.0 mg/L99.60% phosphate
29.68–30.42 mg/L DOC3–714 mg/L69.57% DOC
PFTC 9Coking Wastewater40 NTU turbidity9800 mg/L93.20% turbidity[65]
480 mg/L DOC10.10% DOC
2000 mg/L COD10.70% COD
PTSC 10 80.00% turbidity
Fe-PAA-1:0.1 11Humid acidTOC5.00.1 mM Fe~80.00% TOC[66]
Fe-PAA-1:1 12>80.00% TOC
Fe-PAA-1:2 13<80.00% TOC
PSiFAC1.5:10:15 14Tanner Wastewater668 NTU turbidity7.88096.00% turbidity [67,68]
6800 mg/L COD67.00% COD
1.76 mg/L phosphates62.00% phosphates
2.981 UV254nm10.00% UV254nm
Yeast wastewater after aerobic treatment418 NTU turbidity14.00% turbidity
11455 mg/L COD22.00% COD
3.49 mg/L phosphates38.00% phosphates
3.748 UV254nm15.00% UV254nm
Yeast manufacturing wastewater without preliminary anaerobic treatment143 NTU turbidity 40.00% turbidity
4590 mg/L COD56.00% COD
2.40 mg/L phosphates43.00% phosphates
3.307 UV254nm25.00% UV254nm
PSiFAC1.5:10:15 14Simulated surface water17.2 NTU turbidity7.02 mg/L97.00% turbidity[67]
0.153 UV254nm3 mg/L93.00% UV254nm
Tanner wastewater>2000 turbidity100 mg/L99.60% turbidity
PAFSiC1.5:15:10 15Simulated surface water17.2 NTU turbidity2 mg/L~95.00% UV254nm
0.153 UV254nm3 mg/L~85.00% turbidity
Tanner wastewater>2000 turbidity100 mg/L99.70% UV254nm
PFASiC1.5:15:10 16Simulated surface water17.2 NTU turbidity2 mg/L~95.00% turbidity
0.153 UV254nm3 mg/L>90.00% UV254nm
Tanner wastewater>2000 turbidity100 mg/L99.6.00% turbidity
PACl1.5 17Simulated surface water17.2 NTU turbidity2 mg/L93.00% turbidity
0.153 UV254nm3 mg/L78.00% UV254nm
PAPEFAC1.5-10-15 18Tanner Wastewater668 NTU turbidity7.880 mg Al/L~96.00% turbidity[68]
6800 mg/L COD~65.00% COD
1.76 mg/L phosphates<65.00% phosphates
Yeast wastewater after aerobic treatment418 NTU turbidity~20.00% turbidity
11455 mg/L COD~5.00% COD
3.49 mg/L phosphates<30.00% phosphates
Yeast manufacturing wastewater without preliminary anaerobic treatment143 NTU turbidity ~40.00% turbidity
4590 mg/L COD~15.00% COD
2.40 mg/L phosphates~57.00% phosphates
PSiFAC-Mg30-10-15 19Industrial Wastewater5 mg F/L fluoride7.030 mg Al/LQ1.5 170 mg F/g Al[69]
PSiFAC-Na1.5-10-15 20Q1.5 94 mg F/g Al
1,2 poly-ferric chloride OH/Fe:1 or 2, 3 polymeric ferric sulfate, 4 ferric chloride with aluminum chloride, 5 ferrous sulfate with aluminum sulfate, 6 polyaluminum silicate sulfate, 7 polyaluminum chloride, 8 polyaluminum Lanthanum Silicate, 9 poly-ferric-titanium-silicate-chloride, 10 poly-titanium-silicate-chloride, 11 Fe3+ to polyacrylic acid molar ratios of 1:0.1, 12 Fe3+ to polyacrylic acid molar ratios of 1:1, 13 Fe3+ to polyacrylic acid molar ratios of 1:2, 14,15,16 polyaluminum ferric silicate chloride, 1,16 polyaluminum ferric silicate chloride, 17 polyaluminum chloride, 18 poly–aluminum–ferric–APE–chloride, 19 polyaluminum ferric silicate magnesium, 20 polyaluminum ferric silicate chloride.
Table 4. Novel inorganic coagulants with addition of flocculants for wastewater treatment.
Table 4. Novel inorganic coagulants with addition of flocculants for wastewater treatment.
CoagulantFlocculantRemoveInitial ConditionspHCoagulant DosageFlocculant DosageRemovalRef.
FeCl3 1chitosanVegetable oil refinery wastewater3753 NTU turbidity6.01.6 g/L13.4 mg/L100.00% turbidity[70]
7680 mg/L COD86.00% COD
168.36 mg/L polyphenols90.00% polyphenol
1 FeCl3: Ferric chloride.
Table 5. Organic coagulants for wastewater treatment.
Table 5. Organic coagulants for wastewater treatment.
CoagulantsRemoveInitial ConditionspHCoagulant Dosage (mg/L)RemovalRef.
ChitosanBrewery Wastewater160 NTU turbidity8200091.00% turbidity[71]
176 mg/L TOC89.00% TOC
139 mg/L orthophosphate65.00% orthophosphate
CTAB 1Toxic Metal−Organic Complexes10.4 mg/L Cr(III)10.55798.00% Cr(III)[72]
10.4 mg/L Ni(II)92.69% Ni(II)
10.4 mg/L Cu(II)96.63% Cu(II)
10.4 mg/L Zn(II)99.35% Zn(II)
10.4 mg/L Cd(II)99.52% Cd(II)
PE-1 2Sugar industry wastewater83 NTU Turbidity 6.12.074.68% turbidity[73]
1.070.25% TSS
1.572.48% COD
1.571.47% BOD
PE-2 31120 mg/L TSS1.0100% turbidity
1.098.40% TSS
1.594.50% COD
1.571.47% BOD
PE-3 4991 mg/L COD1.087.00% turbidity
1.086.59% TSS
1.582.25% COD
1.579.52% BOD
PE-4 5543 mg/L BOD2.078.50% turbidity
1.075.20% TSS
1.565.36% COD
1.563.67% BOD
1 cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, 2 epichlorohydrin-diphenylamine 1:1, 3 epichlorohydrin-diphenylamine, 4 epichlorohydrin-diphenylamine 2:1, 5 epichlorohydrin-diphenylamine 2.5:1.
Table 6. Hybrid coagulants for wastewater treatment.
Table 6. Hybrid coagulants for wastewater treatment.
CoagulantsRemoveInitial ConditionspHCoagulant Dosage (mg/L)RemovalRef.
PAAP0.1,0.5 1Raw coking wastewater105 NTU turbidity 9.9860082.05% turbidity [74]
4654 mg/L COD24.16% COD
1138.45 mg/L DOC9.34% DOC
22.75 UV254nm12.09% UV254nm
Biologically treated coking wastewater128 NTU turbidity 8.1330097.84% turbidity
109.03 mg/L COD63.39% COD
41.86 mg/L DOC29.97% DOC
2.197 UV254nm37.72% UV254nm
PANS 2Raw water11.4 NTU turbidity10.550014.00% silica[75]
150071.00% silica
200083.00% silica
1990 mg/L Total Solids (raw water)250090.00% silica
PANS-PA1-Z 3500~86.00% silica
100050.00% silica
0.52 meq/L Cationic Demand150070.00% silica
200080.00% silica
250090.00% silica
PANS-PA2-Z 41890 mg/L TOTAL Solids (dissolved fraction)50031.00% silica
100050.00% silica
150070.00% silica
256 mg/L COD200080.00% silica
250090.00% silica
PANS-PA3-Z 550016.00% silica
145 mg/L SiO2 Silica100050.00% silica
Dissolved Fraction150070.00% silica
200080.00% silica
250090.00% silica
PANS-PA1-5 68.41000~40.00% silica
PANS-PA1-10 71500~40.00% silica
PANS-PA1-15 833.7 mg/L Calcium2000~40.00% silica
PANS-PA1-20 9250047.00% silica
PANS-PA2-5 1050039.00% silica
2500~50.00% silica
PANS-PA2-10 1150035.00% silica
2500~50.00% silica
PANS-PA2-15 122.8 mg/L Magnesium50026.00% silica
PANS-PA2-20 1350023.00% silica
250040.00% silica
PANS-PA3-5 1450042.00% silica
250051.00% silica
PANS-PA3-20 15250040.00% silica
PPAZF 16 Domestic sewage232 NTU turbidity 7.71148~98% turbidity[76]
661.51 mg/L COD~96% COD
Pharmaceutical wastewater265 NTU turbidity 4.48~73% turbidity
10,025 mg/L COD~47% COD
1 Si/Al:0.1, OH/Al: 0.5, 2–15 polyaluminum nitrate sulfate/polyamine 16 poly-polyacrylamide-Al-Zn-Fe.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsoutsa, E.K.; Tolkou, A.K.; Kyzas, G.Z.; Katsoyiannis, I.A. New Trends in Composite Coagulants for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Macromol 2024, 4, 509-532. https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4030030

AMA Style

Tsoutsa EK, Tolkou AK, Kyzas GZ, Katsoyiannis IA. New Trends in Composite Coagulants for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Macromol. 2024; 4(3):509-532. https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4030030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsoutsa, Eleftheria K., Athanasia K. Tolkou, George Z. Kyzas, and Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis. 2024. "New Trends in Composite Coagulants for Water and Wastewater Treatment" Macromol 4, no. 3: 509-532. https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4030030

APA Style

Tsoutsa, E. K., Tolkou, A. K., Kyzas, G. Z., & Katsoyiannis, I. A. (2024). New Trends in Composite Coagulants for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Macromol, 4(3), 509-532. https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4030030

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop