Next Article in Journal
Update of the Journal “Aims & Scope”
Previous Article in Journal
Formulation and Characterization of Chitosan-Based Mixed-Matrix Scaffold for Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kinetic, Isothermal, and Thermodynamic Analyses of Adsorption of Humic Acid on Quaternized Porous Cellulose Beads
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of a Polyethylene Breathable Packaging Film with Modified Microcrystalline Cellulose for Fresh Products

Department of Polymer Engineering, Institute for Polymers and Composites (IPC), Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4804-533 Guimarães, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Macromol 2024, 4(2), 269-281; https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4020015
Submission received: 15 March 2024 / Revised: 19 April 2024 / Accepted: 24 April 2024 / Published: 28 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functionalization of Polymers for Advanced Applications)

Abstract

:
In this study, a material based on polyethylene (PE) and microcrystalline cellulose (MC) was developed as a breathable packaging film. Surface functionalization of MC with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) has been shown to be an efficient option to tailor their properties and increase opportunities for the application of MC on the reinforcement of polymers such as polyethylene (PE). The functionalization of MC with the mentioned silane derivative was achieved using a green method and later used in the development of composites with PE in three percentages (1, 3, and 5%). All the materials were prepared by melt blending and characterized in terms of structural properties (ATR-FTIR and FTIR in transmittance mode, EDX, and SEM), thermal properties (DSC and TGA), thermomechanical properties (DMA), contact angle measurements and permeability to water vapor. The materials demonstrated the potential to be used as breathable film packaging for fresh products.

1. Introduction

Depending on the type of food, different barrier properties can be required. For example, a packaging film that enables retailers to market fresh foods with extended shelf-life without employing any major processing or chemical additives (like preservatives) would prevent a significant quantity of fresh products from spoiling [1,2].
Recently, due to the interest in environmentally friendly polymer composites, natural fibers have been used, enhancing mechanical properties and biodegradability of the polymer matrix. Cellulose, a natural fiber, is widely used as reinforcement for polymers due to its availability, great mechanical properties, low cost, and biodegradability combined with unique characteristics such as low density, light weight, high specific area (that can interact more strongly with the matrix), and, above all its, makes cellulose a potential eco-friendly additive [3]. Besides these properties, cellulose could also modify the barrier properties of the polymer matrix. However, their hydrophilic character causes poor compatibility with hydrophobic matrices, such as polyethylene [4]. This problem can be easily solved since the presence of repetitive hydroxyl groups on the cellulose surface makes it suitable for several chemical modifications. These changes are essential to increase the compatibility with a polymer matrix, which is an important requirement to achieve good mechanical properties [3,5,6,7]. Polyethylene (PE) filled with cellulose can have a better compatibility through surface modification of cellulose by the addition of a coupling agent to the matrix. Intensive research on modification strategies of cellulose surface to improve the compatibilization degree between cellulose fibers and polymeric matrices has been performed [7,8,9,10]. Of all the coupling agents used, silane derivatives seem to be an excellent choice due to the diversity of functional groups and their commercial availability on a large scale. Moreover, the diversity of functional groups in silane coupling materials is a useful strategy that enhances the ability of covalent linkage between cellulose fibers and polymer matrices when two functional groups are presented. Usually, the general structure of silane coupling agents available is (RO)3-Si-R′-X, where alkoxy groups (RO) are capable of reacting with the cellulose surface, rich in OH groups, intermediated by hydrolysis processes, and the other group (R′-X) where R′ is an alkyl chain and X is an organofunctional group that can be used to react with the polymer matrix by covalent linkage [11,12]. From all varieties of silane coupling agents, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES), the agent used in this study, is frequently used in silane modification due to its high reactivity, simplistic structure, and low cost resulting in a cellulose-silica composite [13]. Nevertheless, the presence of an amine group on the APTES offers a good compatibilization by covalent linkage, via amine, with PE grafted with maleic anhydride. The modified PE (PE E226) used in this study is FUSABOND® E226 resin, which is described by the FDA as a material that can be used for packaging, transporting, or holding food, subject to the limitations and requirements therein.
Therefore, this work aims to develop a methodology to create a breathable material for packaging applications that incorporates modified MC to be chemically bonded to grafted PE, resulting in a continuous matrix with good mechanical and barrier properties. For this, cellulose was first modified with APTES and then the materials were obtained by reactive blending in a mixer. The structure, morphology, and physical properties of the materials were characterized. Studies of surface hydrophobicity were also performed by contact angle measurement and permeability to water vapor and oxygen was carried out to evaluate the barrier properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Polyethylene grafted with maleic anhydride (PE-g-MA, PE E226 FUSABOND®) was kindly provided by a Portuguese company. Microcrystalline cellulose (MC) and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) were supplied from Acros Organics (Waltham, MA, USA), while lithium chloride (LiCl), ethanol, and ammonia solution 25 wt% were purchased from Fisher Chemical (Geel, Belgium). 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) 98% and calcium chloride anhydrous (CaCl2) 93% were acquired from Alfa Aesar (Waltham, MA, USA). All materials were used without further purification.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Microcrystalline Cellulose Modification with 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane

The modification of microcrystalline cellulose (MC) surface was carried out using a procedure already reported by Jia et al. [14]. First, a suspension with MC (1.4 g) and LiCl (1.5 g) in N,N-dimethylacetamide (20 mL) was left stirring at 90 °C for 3 h, on a borosilicate glass beaker. Then, 5 mL of the previous MC solution was added to a mixture of ethanol (50 mL)/distilled water (10 mL) and promptly, 2 mL of ammonia solution (25 wt%) and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (1 mL) were added at once to the colloidal solution, which remained under strong stirring at room temperature for 24 h. The white precipitate was separated from the solution through centrifugation, washed with a mixture of water/ethanol, and dried in the oven at 60 °C under vacuum.

2.2.2. Microcomposite Preparation

PE-g-MA and MC-APTES were dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 80 °C to prevent the hydrolysis of polymers during processing. Samples were prepared in a batch mixer (Haake Rheomix Roller Roters R600 (Thermo Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA), volume 69 mL), equipped with two rotors running in a counter-rotating way. Firstly, PE-g-MA was introduced inside the mixer and left around 2.5 min, then MC-APTES was added and a melt temperature of 140 °C, 80 rpm, and 7 min reaction time were used (Table 1). After, all materials were recovered in a metallic plate and left to cool under ambient conditions.
To achieve our purposes, three materials were prepared adding 1, 3, and 5 wt% of MC-APTES to the melt matrix. From the prepared materials, thin films were produced by compression molding in a hot press at 140 °C under a compressive force of 10 tons on a 5″ diameter ram, with an average thickness of 100 µm.

2.3. Characterization

2.3.1. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

The FTIR analysis of the initial and modified materials was conducted on a Jasco 4100 FTIR (Jasco, Easton, MD, USA) spectrometer in ATR and transmittance mode for modified MC-APTES and for the prepared films (PE-g-MA_MC-APTES), respectively, in the range of 4500–400 cm−1 using 32 scans and a resolution of 8 cm−1.

2.3.2. Thermal Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a TA Q500 thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The samples (approximately 15 mg) were placed in a platinum crucible and heated from 40 °C to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen flow (60 mL/min). The initial decomposition temperature (Tonset), the derivative maximum decomposing rate temperature (Tmax), and the residual weight were determined.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis was accomplished in a Netzsch 200 Maya (Netzsch, Selb, Germany); approximately 4 mg of each sample was cut and placed in an aluminum pan. A heating/cooling ramp was run at 10 °C/min, between 25 °C and 200 °C under nitrogen, for each sample.
The degree of crystallinity χ c was calculated according to Equation (1), as described in [15] as follows:
χ c % = H m W f · H m 0 × 100 %
where W f is the PE-g-MA weight fraction, H m 0 is the theoretical melting enthalpy of 100% crystalline PE (293 J/g) [16], and H m is the melting enthalpy of our sample.

2.3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphology of the surface and cross-section of the samples was analyzed using a Leica Cambridge S360 scanning electron microscope (Leica, Berlin, Germany). The samples were previously placed in liquid nitrogen and then fractured, followed by a gold thin coating.

2.3.4. Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) Analysis

EDX was performed using a Pegasus X4M (EDAX, Pleasanton, CA, USA) detector coupled to SEM equipment to detect the presence of Si on the sample.

2.3.5. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA)

Dynamic mechanical analysis measurements were made on rectangular films with the same dimensions (2 cm × 0.5 cm × 100 μm) using a Triton Technology DMA. Samples were evaluated using a dynamic temperature sweep to measure the storage modulus and loss moduli (E′ and E″) at a constant frequency (1 Hz), constant force (1 N), and a constant heating rate of 3 °C/min in oscillatory mode in a range of temperatures between 30 °C and 110 °C. The measurements were made three times for each composite.

2.3.6. Contact Angle Measurements (CA)

CA measurements (Contact Angle System OCA 20 Dataphysics, Filderstadt, Germany) were made using distilled water (volume: 3 μL; rate: 2 μL/s) that was dropped on the film surface with a precision syringe using the sessile drop method. The initial image of the drop (taken by 0 s) was recorded with a video camera. At least 20 measurements per film were carried out and the mean value was taken. The contact angles were calculated by the Laplace–Young Fitting method.

2.3.7. Water Vapor Permeability (WVP)

The water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) of films was determined by the ASTM method E96 [17]. The desiccant method was used to determine the value of water vapor transmission. The films were placed in circular metal test dishes with a surface diameter of 69.50 mm and filled with ~25 g of anhydrous CaCl2 previously dried in a vacuum oven at 150 °C overnight. Then, were sealed with parafilm to ensure that humidity migration occurred exclusively through the film. Next, the test cups were placed in a desiccator and kept at room temperature and 94.26 ± 4.33% relative humidity (RH) in triplicate and weighed daily for one month. The measured WVTR of the films was calculated using Equation (2):
WVTR g   water / ( m 2 × hour ) = G t × A
where G/t (g water/h) is the slope (weight versus time plot) and A is the effective film area ( m 2 ). WVTR was calculated using three replications and expressed in g·h−1m−2.

2.3.8. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a post hoc Tukey test was used to perform the statistical analysis of the results, using the OriginPro (v. 9.8.0) program.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Morphological Analysis

The reaction between MC and APTES was performed in solvent; LiCl and DMAc, as a mixture of solvent, is an important factor once the formed complex ([(DMAc)2-Li]Cl) penetrates into the cellulose structure, acting as spacers in the MC packing chains, which facilitates the chemical modification [18]. Therefore, the reaction with silane coupling agent, APTES, occurred successfully and could be confirmed by complementary analysis of ATR-FTIR Figure 1 and EDX Figure 3. The modification of MC with APTES was detected by the appearance of an additional peak at 1562 cm−1, corresponding to the bending vibration of -NH2 groups, indicating that they were successfully introduced onto the MC surface. The adsorption peak of Si-O-Si vibration, characteristic of self-condensation, occurred between the silane reaction with cellulose hydroxyl groups at around 1000–1100 cm−1 and is overlapped with the C-O-C vibration bands of cellulose at around 950–1200 cm−1. Moreover, the band corresponding to the Si-O-cellulose, around 1150 cm−1, could not be observed due to the presence of the large and intense C-O-C vibration bands of cellulose [13,19,20].
After the incorporation of modified cellulose in the polymer, a reaction occurs through amide linkage between the amine group of cellulose-silane and maleic anhydride grafted onto PE, as illustrated on Scheme 1.
According to the ATR-FTIR results (Figure 1a), both samples exhibited absorption peaks that are characteristic of cellulose, namely the peaks at 3318, 2859, 1428, 1315, and 1025 cm−1, which are associated with the vibration of -OH, C-H, -CH2, and C-O, respectively.
Films of the prepared materials and PE-g-MA were analyzed by FTIR in transmittance mode and are depicted in Figure 1b. The covalent linkage between PE-g-MA and modified cellulose was confirmed by the disappearance of the bending vibration -NH2 at 1562 cm−1, which demonstrates that the amino groups on the cellulose surfaces were converted to an -NH-band at 3320 cm−1 and an amide band around 1613 cm−1. Moreover, the band intensity increases with increasing content of modified cellulose and there is also a growth of the broad band related to the -OH groups of cellulose and to the consequent succinic ring opening.
SEM micrographs of PE-g-MA and PE-g-MA containing 5 wt% MC-APTES are represented in Figure 2. Since the micrographs of the materials with 1 and 3 wt% of MC-APTES are very similar to the one with 5% MC-APTES, only the latter is presented. The surface and cross-section of PE-g-MA film, Figure 2a, revealed smooth and homogeneous surfaces, whereas the film that incorporates MC-APTES exhibits a rough surface, Figure 2b. Moreover, in the cross-section of the same samples, in Figure 2b it is possible to notice that MC-APTES is located along the sample and at the surface. As expected from the chemical results, the modified MC was successfully chemically linked to the polymer matrix.
The presence of silicon (Si) and oxygen (O) in the polymer matrix assessed by EDX are present in Figure 3. Figure 3a corresponds to the modified MC, where the O and Si peaks have a significant intensity. As expected, a lower intensity can be observed in Figure 3b, which corresponds to the samples containing 5 wt% of MC-APTES, respectively. Even though the peak intensity increased with the amount of MC-APTES incorporated, they are almost undetected for the samples containing 1 wt%. This can be due to the heterogeneous dispersion of the MC-APTES in the matrix that made the evaluation more complicated since only points are selected in this kind of analysis.
Figure 3. EDX spectra of MC-APTES (a) and PE-g-MA reacted with 5% (b) of MC_APTES.
Figure 3. EDX spectra of MC-APTES (a) and PE-g-MA reacted with 5% (b) of MC_APTES.
Macromol 04 00015 g003

3.2. Thermal and Mechanical Analysis

The effect of MC functionalization with APTES on its thermal properties and incorporation in the PE matrix was evaluated (Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively). Figure 4 depicts the thermal decomposition of MC and modified MC, where it is possible to observe an initial weight loss (~5%) around T = 80 °C, for MC, probably due to the vaporization of adsorbed water. The modification of the MC surface with APTES increases both the initial thermal degradation and temperature at the maximum degradation rate, with a difference of around 10 °C between MC (350.6 °C) and MC-APTES (361.2 °C), as can be seen in Figure 4b. This increase in the thermal stability of MC-APTES may be attributed to the good interaction between the APTES and MC and their consequent crosslinking reactions that occurred during the functionalization. Moreover, the results also demonstrate that for T = 500 °C (Figure 4a), MC-APTES have a higher residual mass value than unmodified MC, 26.9 and 14.6%, respectively. This result can be associated with the presence of siloxy moieties on MC-APTES products that remain as a residue. These results are in agreement with the results reported by H. Khanjanzadeh et al. [13].
TGA results of the prepared materials, Figure 5, reveal that despite the fact that an earlier decomposition temperature between 320–343 °C can be noticed, the thermal stability is slightly enhanced since the degradation peak of the PE matrix shifts to higher temperatures. Whereas the curve for PE-g-MA presented only one thermal degradation stage with a mass loss of almost 100%, the curve of the other samples displays two thermal degradation stages. The first degradation peak is related to cellulose degradation (320–343 °C) and, as expected, increasing the MC-APTES amount increases the weight loss (around 4.5%) and a decrease in the decomposition temperature value, Figure 5b. The same occurs for the degradation peak of PE (478–479 °C), the sample with 1%MC-APTES seems to be the most thermally stable composite when compared with the other composites. This is in accordance with the literature; Ch.V.Alexanyan et al. reported a study where it is possible to verify that the presence of cellulosic materials translates into a slight increase in the degradation temperature. Moreover, the charcoal, resulting from cellulose degradation, contributes to the hydrogenation of the unsaturated products and, consequently, the hydrogenated products develop at higher temperatures [21].
The DSC experimental curves of PE-g-MA_MC-APTES composites obtained from the first heating and cooling cycle are displayed in Figure 6 and Table 2.
Crystalline polymers are characterized by a melting transition at a certain temperature, the melting temperature (Tm), and enthalpy (∆H) for melting. The crystallinity of the PE was in the range of 40–44% for all studied composites, where the crystallinity of neat PE-g-MA is 42.9%. The presence of MC slightly shifts the melting point of PE-g-MA for lower temperatures, narrowing the peak. This could be evidence that the presence of cellulose in the matrix induces less stable crystals. On the other hand, cellulose can act as a nucleating agent during the cooling cycle, whereas the crystallization peak starts at higher temperatures. Although this results, no significant changes in crystallinity are detected, which cannot be related to the following characterization of the film properties.
Dynamic mechanical results of all materials (Figure 7) exhibited an increase in storage modulus as the amount of modified MC content in the polymer increased. This is associated with the reinforcement effect of the MC. Moreover, the shift of tan delta to lower temperatures is in agreement with E′ enhancement as the shift to lower temperatures indicates a better compatibilization between modified MC and the polymer matrix.

3.3. Water Affinity Assessment

Polyethylene is known as a hydrophobic polymer, meaning that its wetting ability is very low, which can be a disadvantage in food applications. Therefore, the incorporation of more hydrophilic materials, such as cellulose and/or cellulose-silane composites, could increase the wettability capacity [22].
Distilled water (volume: 3 μL; rate: 2 μL/s) was dropped on the film surface with a precision syringe using the sessile drop method. The image of the initial drop (taken at 0 s) was recorded with a video camera; the contact angles along with the drop image are depicted in Figure 8. As expected, the increase in MC-APTES content on the PE matrix increases the surface wettability and decreases the contact angle. The CA of PE-g-MA is around 90°, due to the hydrophobic nature of PE, while for the materials with 1, 3, and 5% of MC-APTES, the CA are approximately 83°, 81°, and 79°, respectively. This means that the surface of the film became more hydrophilic with increasing cellulose content, as already reported in the literature [22,23,24]. Thus, these results are in agreement with the obtained surface SEM image, Figure 2b, where is possible to observe the presence of modified cellulose on the film surface. Thus, the effect of cellulose on the hydrophilic character of the prepared materials is visible, since the hydroxyl groups present in cellulose are able to form strong hydrogen bonds with the water molecules. Therefore, it is possible to change the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the material by changing the MC content.
The water vapor barrier property is vital for packaging as it can prevent or allow the transmission of this gas from the atmosphere to the food. Therefore, it is crucial to control the transmission of gases/moisture from the environment to the food to extend the shelf life and quality of food [25]. The incorporation of more hydrophilic materials, such as cellulosic derivatives, can change the barrier properties of the gases. Although cellulose displays an effective barrier to gases when it is in a humid environment, cellulose swells; to overcome this drawback and to afford a hydrophobic character, chemical functionalization has been carried out on the cellulose structure [26]. Despite the silanization of the cellulose surface, a smaller number of hydroxyl groups are still available to link water molecules, promoting a path for water vapor.
The WVTR characterizes the capability of moisture to penetrate and pass through the film and it was assessed to understand the effect of MC-APTES content on film water vapor transmission, Figure 9. The results of WVTR demonstrate that the addition of modified cellulose in the PE matrix increased the WVTR of the films from 0.13 ± 0.030 g·h−1m−2 (PE-g-MA) to 0.29 ± 0.026 and 0.37 ± 0.038 and 0.69 ± 0.015 g·h−1m−2 of the films with 1, 3, and 5%MC-APTES, respectively. The presence of modified MC results in a lower barrier to water molecules when compared to PE-g-MA and an increase from 3 to 5% MC-APTES raises the WVTR almost twice, namely by 0.37 and 0.69 g·h−1m2, respectively. This agrees with the literature results, where it is reported that cellulose increases barrier properties due to its solid web-like architecture.

4. Conclusions

An environmentally friendly and simple modification of the MC surface with silane derivatives, as shown in FTIR analysis, and posterior melt blending with PE-g-MA allowed the chemical bonding of both polymer matrix and MC. SEM studies reveal strong interactions between the amino-silane groups attached to the cellulose and the MA grafted in the PE matrix. Consequently, the mechanical properties improved when compared to the polymer matrix. Moreover, the introduction of modified cellulose in the PE matrix results in an increase in thermal stability, shifting the degradation peak of the PE matrix to higher temperatures.
The hydrophilicity and water vapor transmission of produced films can be controlled depending on MC-APTES contents and increasing the MC-APTES content increases the wettability of the film and consequently decreases the CA. For example, the CA of PE-g-MA_5%MC-APTES composite is significantly lower than for neat PE-g-MA, ~79° and ~90°, respectively, which means more hydrophilic film. Similarly, increasing the MC-APTES content results in higher WVTR compared to neat PE-g-MA.
Therefore, the strategy used allows us to prepare packaging films with good mechanical properties and gas transmission for fresh products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.R.C., A.M.S.S. and A.V.M.; methodology, P.V.R., M.C.R.C., A.M.S.S. and A.V.M.; software, P.V.R. and L.M.; validation, A.M.S.S. and A.V.M.; formal analysis, P.V.R., M.C.R.C., A.M.S.S. and A.V.M.; investigation, M.C.R.C., A.M.S.S. and L.M.; resources, A.V.M.; data curation, P.V.R., M.C.R.C., A.M.S.S. and A.V.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.S.S. and L.M; writing—review and editing, P.V.R., M.C.R.C. and A.V.M.; visualization, A.V.M.; supervision, A.V.M.; project administration, A.V.M.; funding acquisition, A.V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded within the scope of the project TSSiPRO—technologies for sustainable and smart innovative products—NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000015. The authors also acknowledge the financial support by Portugal 2020 and Fundo Social Europeu (FSE) through Programa Operacional Regional do NORTE (NORTE-08-5369-FSE-000034), developed under the program “IMPULSE—Polímeros e Compósitos: Drivers da inovação tecnológica e da competitividade industrial”.

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also form part of an ongoing study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Czerwiński, K.; Rydzkowski, T.; Wróblewska-Krepsztul, J.; Thakur, V.K. Towards Impact of Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) on Shelf-Life of Polymer-Film-Packed Food Products: Challenges and Sustainable Developments. Coatings 2021, 11, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Caleb, O.J.; Mahajan, P.V.; Al-Said, F.A.-J.; Opara, U.L. Modified Atmosphere Packaging Technology of Fresh and Fresh-cut Produce and the Microbial Consequences—A Review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 303–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Miao, C.; Hamad, W. Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: A critical review. Cellulose 2013, 20, 2221–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yano, H.; Omura, H.; Honma, Y.; Okumura, H.; Sano, H.; Nakatsubo, F. Designing cellulose nanofiber surface for high density polyethylene reinforcement. Cellulose 2018, 25, 3351–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zimniewska, M.; Wladyka-Przybylak, M.; Mankowski, J. Cellulosic Bast Fibers, Their Structure and Properties Suitable for Composite Applications. In Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-Polymer Composites—Green Chemistry and Technology, 1st ed.; Kalia, S., Kaith, B.S., Kaur, I., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 97–119. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rajak, D.K.; Pagar, D.D.; Menezes, P.L.; Linul, E. Fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Manufacturing, properties, and applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mohit, H.; Arul Mozhi Selvan, V. A comprehensive review on surface modification, structure interface and bonding mechanism of plant cellulose fiber reinforced polymer based composites. Compos. Interfaces 2018, 25, 629–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Missoum, K.; Belgacem, N.; Bras, J. Nanofibrillated Cellulose Surface Modification: A Review. Materials 2013, 6, 1745–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abushammala, H.; Mao, J. A Review of the Surface Modification of Cellulose and Nanocellulose Using Aliphatic and Aromatic Mono- and Di-Isocyanates. Molecules 2019, 24, 2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tavakolian, M.; Jafari, S.; van de Ven, T. A Review on Surface-Functionalized Cellulosic Nanostructures as Biocompatible Antibacterial Materials. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Xie, Y.; Hill, C.A.S.; Xiao, Z.; Militz, H.; Mai, C. Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: A review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 806–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jayasuriya, C.K. Interfacial Bonding in Polymer–Ceramic Nanocomposites. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Khanjanzadeh, H.; Behrooz, R.; Bahramifar, N.; Gindl-Altmutter, W.; Bacher, M.; Edler, M.; Griesser, T. Surface chemical functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals by 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 1288–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jia, N.; Li, S.-M.; Ma, M.-G.; Zhu, J.; Sun, R.-C. Synthesis and characterization of cellulose-silica composite fiber in ethanol/water mixed solvents. Bioresources 2011, 6, 1186–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tarani, E.; Arvanitidis, I.; Christofilos, D.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Chrissafis, K.; Vourlias, G. Calculation of the degree of crystallinity of HDPE/GNPs nanocomposites by using various experimental techniques: A comparative study. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 1621–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mirabella, F.; Bafna, A. Determination of the crystallinity of polyethylene/-olefin copolymers by thermal analysis: Relationship of the heat of fusion of 100% polyethylene crystal and the density. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2002, 40, 1637–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. ASTM E96/E96M-16; Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015.
  18. Kotov, N.; Raus, V.; Dybal, J. Intermolecular Interactions in N,N-Dimethylacetamide without and with LiCl Studied by Infrared Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Model Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 8921–8930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, Y.; Lv, X.; Bao, J.; Xie, J.; Tang, X.; Che, J.; Ma, Y.; Tong, J. Characterization of Silane Treated and Untreated Natural Cellulosic Fibre from Corn Stalk Waste as Potential Reinforcement in Polymer Composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 218, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bengtsson, M.; Oksman, K. The use of silane technology in crosslinking polyethylene/wood flour composites. Composites Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 752–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lomakin, S.M.; Rogovina, S.Z.; Grachev, A.V.; Prut, E.V.; Alexanyan, C.V. Thermal degradation of biodegradable blends of polyethylene with cellulose and ethylcellulose. Thermochim. Acta 2011, 521, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hubbe, M.A.; Ferrer, A.; Tyagi, P.; Yin, Y.; Salas, C.; Pal, L.; Rojas, O.J. Nanocellulose in Thin Films, Coatings, and Plies for Packaging Applications: A Review. BioResources 2017, 12, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dang, X.; Cao, X.; Ke, L.; Ma, Y.; An, J.; Wang, F. Combination of cellulose nanofibers and chain-end-functionalized polyethylene and their applications in nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. da S. Junior, O.G.; de Melo, R.P.; do B.C. Sales, R.; Ayres, E.; de O. Patricio, P.S. Processing and characterization of polyethylene/starch/curauá composites: Potential for application as thermal insulated coating. J. Build. Eng. 2017, 11, 178–186. [Google Scholar]
  25. Siracusa, V. Food Packaging Permeability Behaviour: A Report. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2012, 2012, 302029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fotie, G.; Limbo, S.; Piergiovanni, L. Manufacturing of Food Packaging Based on Nanocellulose: Current Advances and Challenges. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Reaction scheme of PE-g-MA and MC-APTES.
Scheme 1. Reaction scheme of PE-g-MA and MC-APTES.
Macromol 04 00015 sch001
Figure 1. (a) ATR-FTIR spectra of MC and MC-APTES and (b) transmitance FTIR spectra of PE-g-MA-MC-APTES films.
Figure 1. (a) ATR-FTIR spectra of MC and MC-APTES and (b) transmitance FTIR spectra of PE-g-MA-MC-APTES films.
Macromol 04 00015 g001
Figure 2. Sample surface and cross-section SEM micrographs of (a) PE-g-MA and (b) PE-g-MA + 5%MC-APTES.
Figure 2. Sample surface and cross-section SEM micrographs of (a) PE-g-MA and (b) PE-g-MA + 5%MC-APTES.
Macromol 04 00015 g002
Figure 4. TGA curve weight loss (a) and first derivative (b) of unmodified MC and modified MC.
Figure 4. TGA curve weight loss (a) and first derivative (b) of unmodified MC and modified MC.
Macromol 04 00015 g004
Figure 5. TGA curve weight loss (a) and first derivative (b) of PE-g-MA and PE-g-MA-MC-APTES composites.
Figure 5. TGA curve weight loss (a) and first derivative (b) of PE-g-MA and PE-g-MA-MC-APTES composites.
Macromol 04 00015 g005
Figure 6. Thermal behavior of PE-g-MA and prepared samples.
Figure 6. Thermal behavior of PE-g-MA and prepared samples.
Macromol 04 00015 g006
Figure 7. Storage modulus (solid) and tan δ (dash) obtained by DMA for neat PE-g-MA and PE_MC-APTES composites.
Figure 7. Storage modulus (solid) and tan δ (dash) obtained by DMA for neat PE-g-MA and PE_MC-APTES composites.
Macromol 04 00015 g007
Figure 8. Contact angle of PE-g-MA and prepared samples.
Figure 8. Contact angle of PE-g-MA and prepared samples.
Macromol 04 00015 g008
Figure 9. Water vapor transmission along time (left) and WVTR (right) of all the material films.
Figure 9. Water vapor transmission along time (left) and WVTR (right) of all the material films.
Macromol 04 00015 g009
Table 1. Composition and processing conditions.
Table 1. Composition and processing conditions.
Composition CodeWeight (%)Processing Conditions
PE-g-MAMA-APTESTm (°C)Rotors Speed (rpm)tmixing (min)
PE-g-MA_1% MC-APTES991140802.5 mixing + 7 reaction
PE-g-MA_3% MC-APTES973
PE-g-MA_5% MC-APTES955
Table 2. DSC results for PE-g-MA composites.
Table 2. DSC results for PE-g-MA composites.
SampleΔHm [J/g]Χc [%]Tm [°C]Tc [°C]
PE-g-MA123.942.3125105
1% MC-APTES126.843.7124107
3% MC-APTES120.342.3124106
5% MC-APTES111.840.2123107
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodrigues, P.V.; Castro, M.C.R.; Soares, A.M.S.; Melro, L.; Machado, A.V. Development of a Polyethylene Breathable Packaging Film with Modified Microcrystalline Cellulose for Fresh Products. Macromol 2024, 4, 269-281. https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4020015

AMA Style

Rodrigues PV, Castro MCR, Soares AMS, Melro L, Machado AV. Development of a Polyethylene Breathable Packaging Film with Modified Microcrystalline Cellulose for Fresh Products. Macromol. 2024; 4(2):269-281. https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4020015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodrigues, Pedro V., M. Cidália R. Castro, Ana M. S. Soares, Liliana Melro, and Ana V. Machado. 2024. "Development of a Polyethylene Breathable Packaging Film with Modified Microcrystalline Cellulose for Fresh Products" Macromol 4, no. 2: 269-281. https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4020015

APA Style

Rodrigues, P. V., Castro, M. C. R., Soares, A. M. S., Melro, L., & Machado, A. V. (2024). Development of a Polyethylene Breathable Packaging Film with Modified Microcrystalline Cellulose for Fresh Products. Macromol, 4(2), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.3390/macromol4020015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop