Next Article in Journal
Association between Obstructive Lung Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: Results from the Vermont Diabetes Information System
Previous Article in Journal
Complications after Thoracocentesis and Chest Drain Insertion: A Single Centre Study from the North East of England

Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis—An Update on the Diagnosis, Treatment and Drug Resistance

Department of Bacteriology, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai 600031, India
Public Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Cesar A. Moran
J. Respir. 2021, 1(2), 141-164;
Received: 19 April 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021 / Published: 26 May 2021


Pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms (MTBC) primarily cause pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB); however, MTBC are also capable of causing disease in extrapulmonary (EP) organs, which pose a significant threat to human health worldwide. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) accounts for about 20–30% of all active TB cases and affects mainly children and adults with compromised immune systems. EPTB can occur through hematogenous, lymphatic, or localized bacillary dissemination from a primary source, such as PTB, and affects the brain, eye, mouth, tongue, lymph nodes of neck, spine, bones, muscles, skin, pleura, pericardium, gastrointestinal, peritoneum, and the genitourinary system as primary and/or disseminated disease. EPTB diagnosis involves clinical, radiological, microbiological, histopathological, biochemical/immunological, and molecular methods. However, only culture and molecular techniques are considered confirmatory to differentiate MTBC from any non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species. While EPTB due to MTBC responds to first-line anti-TB drugs (ATD), drug susceptibility profiling is an essential criterion for addressing drug-resistant EPTB cases (DR-EPTB). Besides antibiotics, adjuvant therapy with corticosteroids has also been used to treat specific EPTB cases. Occasionally, surgical intervention is recommended, mainly when organ damage is debilitating to the patient. Recent epidemiological studies show a striking increase in DR-EPTB cases ranging from 10–15% across various reports. As a neglected disease, significant developments in rapid and accurate diagnosis and better therapeutic interventions are urgently needed to control the emerging EPTB situation globally. In this review, we discuss the recent advances in the clinical diagnosis, treatment, and drug resistance of EPTB.
Keywords: lymph node; PCR; meningitis; lymphadenitis; pericarditis; cutaneous; genitourinary; miliary; drug resistance lymph node; PCR; meningitis; lymphadenitis; pericarditis; cutaneous; genitourinary; miliary; drug resistance

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among humans worldwide. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms (MTBC) cause TB primarily in the lungs (pulmonary TB; PTB) but can also affect other organs, causing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). Common disease manifestations of EPTB include meningitis, lymphadenitis, ocular, oral, pleuritis, pericarditis, peritonitis, cutaneous, musculoskeletal, abdominal, genitourinary, and miliary forms of tuberculosis (Table 1). EPTB cases accounted for 16% of the 7.5 million incident cases worldwide in 2019 [1]. EPTB can be either primary (at the site of initial infection) or secondary (disseminated), which usually occurs due to hematogenous or lymphatic spread of bacteria from the primary organ, reactivation of latent TB (LTBI), ingestion of infected sputum, or spread locally from adjacent organs [2,3]. The diagnosis and treatment of EPTB are challenging. Most cases show constitutive symptoms such as fever, weight loss, night sweats, or malaise with specific systemic symptoms based on the organ affected. In general, symptomatic patients are subjected to radiologic imaging of the infected organs to evaluate and plan a more accurate and specific diagnostic test. Usually, the extrapulmonary sample obtained by fine-needle aspiration or biopsy is used for microscopy, histopathology, culture, biochemical/immunological, and molecular testing, including drug susceptibility, to start an effective treatment [2,3,4]. The sensitivity and specificity of various tests used to diagnose EPTB are highly variable; in most cases, clinical disease presentation should be considered in choosing and interpreting a specific diagnostic test. The treatment regimen for EPTB is the same as that for PTB for drug-sensitive and resistant cases; however, brain or bone involvement prompts a more extended treatment than PTB. Considering the clinical significance of EPTB, it is vital to provide a comprehensive and cohesive review of various diagnostic modalities, treatment options, and complications associated with managing these poorly understood diseases. In this review, we summarize the recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of EPTB with a particular emphasis on the rising surge of drug-resistant forms of EPTB cases.

2. Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis of the Head and Neck

The EPTB of the head and neck comprise meningitis (brain), cervical lymphadenitis (neck), ocular (eye), and oral (mouth and tongue).

2.1. Tuberculous Meningitis

The central nervous system (CNS) involvement is the most severe form, accounting for 5–10% of all EPTB cases, with TB meningitis (TBM) being the predominant condition. TBM is common in children (below four years of age) and immunosuppressed individuals such as those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and can occur with or without an associated PTB. Besides TBM, intracranial tuberculoma, tuberculous brain abscesses, arachnoiditis, increased intracranial pressure, and hydrocephalus were noted in CNS disease [5,6]. The onset of TBM manifests in neurological complications, such as headache, low-grade fever, malaise, vomiting, and confusion. When untreated, TBM can cause seizures, coma, and stupor. These clinical signs correspond to stage I (fully conscious and no focal deficits); stage II (conscious but with lethargy, confusion, and mild focal neurological symptoms, such as cranial nerve palsy or hemiparesis); and stage III (stupor, seizures, coma, palsies, or hemiplegia). Prognosis is dependent on the stage of diagnosis and treatment [5,6,7]. Diagnosis of TBM usually depends on clinical symptoms, radiologic imaging such as computerized tomography (CT) scan, and the presence of extra-neural TB. Usually, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients is analyzed for disease markers. In general, predominant lymphocyte presence (60–400 cells/mL), elevated protein levels (0.8–4 g/L), a decrease in sugar levels (18–45 mg/dL), and an adenosine deaminase (ADA) level of 5–15 IU/L are indicators of suspected TBM [8,9]. Furthermore, a recent retrospective study indicated that a higher CSF protein level was associated with poor TBM prognosis in children [10]. The sensitivity and specificity of ADA are 86–89% and 78–91%, respectively, in diagnosing TBM using CSF [11,12]. Measurement of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels had a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 85%, respectively, and the same features reported 76% and 88%, respectively, for T-SPOT-TB using CSF samples [13,14]. Due to the paucibacillary nature of MTBC at the disease site in TBM, microbiological diagnosis is very challenging. The bacteriological confirmation rate of TBM diagnosis ranges between 10% and 87% of cases [8,15]. However, the acid-fast bacilli (AFB) test’s sensitivity is <25%, and culture is 25–70% with 100% specificity in the CSF of TBM cases [9].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered superior to CT for the neuroradiology diagnosis of TBM [16,17]. The sensitivity and specificity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based TBM diagnostic tests are 48–100% and 38–100%, respectively [9]. Multiplex PCR assays using MPT64 and IS6110 primers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) have shown 71.4% sensitivity and 89.6% specificity in the rapid diagnosis of TBM [18]. The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay targeting IS6110 and MPB64 reported a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 99% for CSF samples [19]. Molecular diagnostic tools, such as Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra, are reported to have a 70% and 87% sensitivity, while 97% and 88% specificity, respectively, for adult CSF samples over smear microscopy/culture referred to as microbiological reference standard (MRS). In children, Xpert MTB/RIF has 54% sensitivity and 94% specificity over MRS. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends Xpert MTB/RIF over smear microscopy/culture as the initial test for detecting TBM using CSF in adults and children [20]. Though line probe assays (LiPA) have been used for TBM diagnosis, more studies are needed to establish this test’s sensitivity to use directly on CSF samples [21,22]. Although a single, positive diagnostic test is helpful, confirmatory diagnosis of CNS-TB cases most often requires a spectrum of tests (Table 2).
Treatment of TBM includes chemotherapy using standard anti-TB drugs (ATDs) as prescribed for PTB (Table 3). The WHO recommends 2 months of initial treatment phase with isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), and ethambutol (ETM), followed by 10 months of INH and RIF as a standard regimen for drug-sensitive TBM cases [43,44,45,46]. The development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mtb strains, which are resistant to INH and RIF, is disastrous to TBM treatment. No standard or proven regimen is currently available except the one recommended by the WHO for PTB. Studies suggest using fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, in addition to the standard regimen for MDR-TBM, since these drugs have good CSF penetration and are effective against MDR-strains [9]. However, these drugs have the advantage only if added early on in the treatment regimen [47,48] (Table 3). Besides the standard TB treatment, the WHO recommends using adjunctive corticosteroids, including prednisone and dexamethasone, initially as intravenous and continued as an oral treatment to reduce mortality among TBM cases (Table 1). Few studies have shown reduced patient mortality when treated with corticosteroids, which were further augmented by other drugs, such as aspirin [47,48,49]. Thus, adjunctive host-directed therapies, including corticosteroids and aspirin, should be considered for effective TBM management.

2.2. Tuberculous Lymphadenitis

Tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBL), commonly called Scrofula, is the most common form of EPTB, constituting 35–40% of EPTB [50,51]. The disease is mostly non-fatal and presents as unilateral single or multiple painless lumps, usually affecting the cervical lymph node in 60–90% of TBL cases. The submandibular and supraclavicular lymph nodes are involved in a few instances [50,51]. TBL usually more frequently occurs in individuals with a previous TB history than individuals without a prior TB history and affects the age group of 20 to 40 years. Typical TB symptoms, such as fever, night sweats, and weight loss, were observed in some patients [52,53].
The specimens’ paucibacillary nature makes TBL diagnosis challenging and necessitates a combination of clinical, radiologic, microbiological, and molecular diagnostic tests to confirm the disease [54,55]. A combination of cytology (positive for epithelioid cell granulomas, multinucleated giant cells, a granulomatous lesion with caseation and necrosis), and AFB identification in the specimen can also help to diagnose TBL. The fine-needle aspiration culture (FNAC) has a specificity of 88–96%, while the smear has 34.6–66.0% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity in diagnosing TBL [23,25]. Imaging techniques such as CT or MRI can be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool for TBL [56]. However, imaging alone is insufficient to discriminate TBL from other necrotic lymphadenopathies. Therefore, patients’ clinical presentation and demographics should be considered for interpreting the imaging results of TBL cases [57]. PCR diagnosis using IS6081 showed 42% sensitivity and 89.2% specificity, while LAMP using IS6110 and MBP64 had 80% sensitivity [19,26]. T-SPOT-TB has 91% sensitivity and 74% specificity for TBL diagnosis [24]. Xpert MTB/Rif and Xpert Ultra have 89% and 70% sensitivity and 86% and 100% specificity, respectively, over MRS for lymph node aspirates. These tests’ sensitivity and specificity were 78% and 90–100%, and 78% and 38–87%, respectively, over MRS for adult lymph node biopsy sample (Table 2) [20].
Treatment modalities for TBL include the standard ATD regimen used for PTB [43,44,45,46] (Table 3). In selected TBL cases, incision and drainage can be applied, and surgical intervention is rarely required. After the standard treatment, residual lymph nodes’ presence is not considered a sign of recurrence or treatment failure TBL [52,58,59,60].

2.3. Ocular Tuberculosis

Ocular tuberculosis (OTB) broadly refers to Mtb infection of the eye, in and around its surface. The disease can be primarily in the eyes or secondary spreading through blood supply from elsewhere. Primary progressive TB of the eye is rare, and most of the OTB cases involve exogenous infections of the eyelids, conjunctival, corneal, and scleral lesions, while the secondary disease is more common and affects the uveal tract, retina, and optic nerve. Uveitis is the most common EPTB due to the vascular supply and presents as anterior, intermediate, posterior uveitis, and pan-uveitis [61,62,63].
As patients do not usually present with other symptoms of classical TB, diagnosis is very challenging. Ophthalmic examination and a blood test for white blood cell (WBC) counts and inflammation markers are the first indicators of OTB diagnosis. Since ocular TB is very unusual, no molecular diagnostic test has been explicitly indicated for OTB diagnosis. Therefore, imaging techniques—including fluorescein and indocyanine angiography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography, ultrasonography, and microperimetry— are extensively used to assess the extent of damage to the eye as well as a therapeutic response [64,65]. The patient’s prior TB history is reviewed to rule out other reasons before tests specific to OTB are performed for uveitis. Retrieving samples from the eye is challenging, and in most instances, they are paucibacillary. Microbiological testing involving smear, culture, and molecular diagnosis is performed from the aqueous and vitreous samples obtained from the eye. A smear or culture from the specimen’s biopsy from eyelids, conjunctiva, and lacrimal glands can prove confirmatory. If direct smear test of the sample fails to show any bacteria, then a culture is grown from the sample to confirm bacterial presence. Histological analysis of samples from fluids or tissue reveals granulomas and caseating necrosis irrespective of the presence of AFB [61,66,67]. Molecular diagnosis involves using multiplex PCR and real-time PCR for Mtb MBP64, and IS6110 and protein b using aqueous samples, vitreous samples, subretinal fluid, and tissue specimens showed a sensitivity and specificity of 77.77% and 100%, respectively. qPCR for MBP64 was reported in few case reports of uveitis [68]. LAMP assay targeting mbp64 gene using aqueous and vitreous samples showed sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 100%, respectively [69]. MTBDRplus was tested for intraocular tuberculosis with 36% sensitivity and 100% specificity [70]. Xpert MTB/RIF showed a sensitivity of 23% and specificity of 100% for intraocular tuberculosis [71].
Management of OTB involves the use of standard ATDs prescribed for PTB cases [43,44,45,46] (Table 3), which could be supplemented with adjuvants (Table 1). Systemic corticosteroids, such as oral prednisone, are recommended in the first few weeks, along with ATDs, to reduce inflammation, particularly macular edema. Topical steroids and prednisone drops can be used wherever they can alleviate the symptoms [61,72,73,74,75,76]. Paradoxical worsening of the OTB has been reported in cases with (on retroviral therapy) or without HIV infection. In these cases, new lesions developed at the same or different disease sites and worsening of existing OTB, in which case it is recommended to increase steroid dose or change the administration route (preferably systemic). The addition of immunosuppressants can alleviate the inflammation and help to resume ATDs [77,78].

2.4. Oral Tuberculosis

Oral tuberculosis (OrTB) is another rare form of EPTB and can occur as a primary or secondary infection. Primary infections are uncommon and usually seen in children and young adults with painless ulcers, single and associated with lymph node enlargement more commonly in the gingiva than the tongue. It is related to a trauma of the affected area (inflammation or irritation) [79,80,81,82]. The secondary infection is more common and usually associated with a PTB. They are seen as single, irregular, superficial, or deep painful ulcers, odynophagia, and sometimes associated with mandible or maxillary bone TB. The infection can occur due to inoculation of the oral cavity by Mtb from sputum or hematogenous spread from other primary sites [81,83,84,85,86]. The tongue is most commonly affected in OrTB, while any oral mucosa including palate, lips, buccal mucosa, gingiva, palatine tonsil, and mouth floor could be involved. Constitutional symptoms are rare in OrTB [87,88,89]. Tonsillar TB is extremely rare and hence clinically missed out. It presents with chronic tonsillitis and sore throat and is a secondary form of EPTB [90]. Pharyngeal TB is another sporadic form of EPTB, which presents as a neck mass, nasal blockage, fever, and night sweats and is usually a secondary form of EPTB [91].
The differential diagnosis of oral tuberculosis is complicated by ulcers that are more common in primary syphilis, severe fungal disease, and non-infectious conditions, such as traumatic ulcers or squamous cell carcinoma. The biopsy of the specimen becomes the best criteria for assessing OrTB. X-rays of the mandible and maxilla are performed where TB osteomyelitis is suspected. The AFB and culture of the biopsy sample are confirmatory for the presence of Mtb, although smears could be negative in many cases [82,83,84,85,92]. Histopathology of biopsy indicates caseating granuloma with central necrosis, surrounded by epithelioid cells, Langhans type of giant cells, and lymphocytes infiltration, while in immunocompromised cases, a non-caseating granuloma is seen [87,88,89]. Fine-needle aspiration cytology has also been used to confirm OrTB [65,93,94]. Molecular methods involving PCR have also been explored to diagnose OrTB, but no data are available on its sensitivity or specificity [80,95]. However, the application of Xpert MTB/RIF, LAMP, or LiPA for OrTB diagnosis has not been reported.
Treatment of OrTB follows the same regimen as standard PTB chemotherapy with ATDs (Table 3). Clinicians recommend using topical anti-inflammatory drugs or mucosa-protecting agents (Table 1), depending on the case presentation seen [87,88,89].

3. Extrapulmonary TB of the Thorax

EPTB of the thorax includes pleuritis (pleura) and pericarditis (pericardium).

3.1. Pleural Tuberculosis

Pleural tuberculosis (PLTB) is one of the common forms of EPTB associated with PTB as an immune reaction or miliary TB. PLTB is rare in children 2–12 years old and is commonly found in adolescents 12–16 years old and adults [96,97,98]. The typical clinical features are fever (in about 86% of cases), chest pain, cough, and dyspnoea, and it is sometimes associated with loss of appetite, malaise, and weight loss, [99].
Diagnosis involves a combination of clinical, radiological, microbiological, and molecular testing. Non-invasive tests such as chest X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, MRI or fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) reveal pleural effusion, the extent of pleural wall thickening, differential diagnosis of parenchymal lesions, and mediastinal lymph nodes. CT, MRI, and FDG-PET help rule out other clinical conditions, such as pneumonia, inflammation, or malignancy associated with pleural effusion and thickening. Further, thoracentesis is required for the therapeutic drain of pleural fluid, especially in large effusions, and a cutting needle pleural biopsy is performed when thoracentesis is inconclusive. This pleural fluid or biopsy sample can be used to diagnose PLTB further. Besides the pleural sample, a sputum sample is induced and collected for further diagnosis [96,100,101]. Two biochemical parameters, ADA and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) levels, are monitored in pleural fluid, and elevated levels of these markers help PLTB diagnosis in high prevalence or endemic settings. In endemic countries, pleural ADA levels of >40 IU/L have a positive predictive value of 98% [102]. With a cut-off value of 40.68 IU/L, the assay had 88.37% sensitivity and 88% specificity [27,103]. A recent study reported that the ratio of lactate dehydrogenase to ADA ratio (LDH/ADA) of ≤10 has a specificity of 90% and sensitivity of 78% for PLTB diagnosis in high TB incidence settings [104]. While interferon-γ levels at a 95 ng/ml threshold are reported to give 86.61% sensitivity and 90.2% specificity in diagnosing PLTB, T-SPOT-TB has a sensitivity of 92.86% and specificity of 92.16% for PLTB (Table 2) [28]. The presence of AFB in smears and culture of mycobacteria from pleural fluid or induced sputum is confirmatory of PLTB. Moreover, establishment of epithelioid granuloma or caseating granuloma in a pleural biopsy indicates PLTB [99,101,105]. PCR (IS6110) has a sensitivity of 82% and sensitivity with multiplex PCR (MBP64 and IS6110) showing improved sensitivity of 95.34% [29,30]. LAMP assays targeting IS6110 and MPB64 reported 25–75.8% sensitivity and 83.3–100% specificity [19], while the MTBDRplus showed 44% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity when tested directly on samples [106]. Xpert MTB/RIF can be used as an initial test for adults and children with EP-TB indications using a pleural fluid sample. The Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra sensitivities are 50% and 71% over MRS with 99% and 71% specificity, respectively, for adult pleural fluid (Table 2) [20].
PLTB treatment involves the use of ATDs in a regimen similar to PTB (Table 3). The use of adjunct corticosteroid therapy is not recommended since the beneficial effects of such treatment are inconclusive. Thoracentesis could be performed in addition to chemotherapy (Table 1) to alleviate dyspnoea and reduce pleural thickening and associated functional impairment [99,101,105,107,108].

3.2. Tuberculous Pericarditis

Tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) is an uncommon manifestation of TB and a cause of mortality without proper diagnosis and treatment. TBP usually develops through the hematogenous spread and retrograde lymphatic spread of Mtb from peritracheal, peribronchial, or mediastinal lymph nodes or primary or secondary TB. TBP has three clinical forms: pericardial effusion, constrictive pericarditis, and a combination of effusion and constriction. Pericardial effusion is marked by fever, weight loss, night sweats, cough, chest pain, and breathlessness, along with moderate to high pericardial effusion. In the next stage, constrictive pericarditis is seen along with thick fibrinous fluid around the heart. Constrictive pericarditis is seen as a constriction of the heart secondary to pericardial inflammation and edema [109,110,111]. HIV co-morbidity has shown a rise in TBP due to increased hematogenous spread [110,112,113].
The diagnosis of TBP is very challenging. Chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram are essential for diagnosing pericarditis. The definitive diagnosis involves the presence of AFB on smear or culture of pericardial fluid or caseating granulomatous lesions in the histopathology of pericardium samples [109]. However, due to the paucibacillary nature of pericardial effusion and the hazardous invasive pericardial biopsy procedure, other options need to be considered. ADA and IFN-γ measurement above 40 U/L and 50 pg/mL in the pericardial fluid is reported useful in diagnosis [114]. Diagnosis using pericardial ADA levels had 87–93% sensitivity and 89–97% specificity [31], while the sensitivity and specificity for IFN-γ were 87–85% and 91–97%, respectively, and the T-SPOT-TB showed 92.3% sensitivity and 87.9% specificity for TBP diagnosis (Table 2) [32,34]. Multiple imaging methods such as CT, MRI, cardiac magnetic resonance, and FDG-PET have been used for TBP diagnosis [115,116,117,118]. A previous report using IS6110-PCR had a sensitivity of 15% and specificity of 100% [33]. Since Xpert MTB/RIF has a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 88% over MRS in adult pericardial fluid samples, it can be used as an initial diagnostic test (Table 2) [20].
TBP treatment aims at reducing bacterial burden, alleviating cardiac symptoms such as compression, and preventing hemodynamic sequelae and progression to constrictive condition. Standard chemotherapy with ATDs, similar to PTB treatment, is currently followed for TBP therapy [43,44,45,46] (Table 3). Moreover, there is a proven positive effect of echocardiographic or fluoroscopic-guided needle pericardiocentesis (Table 1) to evacuate the pericardium of compressive pericardial fluid and alleviate cardiac tamponade [112,113,119,120,121]. Studies have shown neutral results with no benefits or harm in using colchicine and M. indicus pranii as adjuvant therapy to prevent constriction in TBP cases [122,123]. Oral or intrapericardial corticosteroids are promising yet contraindicative in HIV cases and restricted only to immunocompetent individuals [112,113,120,123,124].

4. Extrapulmonary TB of Skin, Bone and Muscle

Common EPTB that affects skin, soft tissues, and musculoskeletal structures (bones and muscles) are discussed here.

4.1. Cutaneous Tuberculosis

Cutaneous or skin tuberculosis (CTB) constitutes 1–1.5% of all EPTB. The primary source of CTB could be exogenous, endogenous, or through hematogenous spread. In an exogenous spread, there is a direct TB inoculation or tuberculous chancre. The bacilli enter through minor skin abrasions or broken skin onto a person previously uninfected by Mtb. Over 2 to 4 weeks post-inoculation, the infection develops as a non-tender nodule that enlarges and erodes into a painless ulcer. When the same happens in a person with pre-existing immunity to TB, it occurs as TB verrucosa cutis, which manifests as a painful hyperkeratotic or verrucous papule with an inflammatory areola. CTB due to endogenous source (known as scrofuloderma) occurs on the skin as a contiguous extension of underlying TB, usually lymphadenitis or bone or joint or epididymis TB. This lesion appears as a subcutaneous swelling or nodule that gets attached to overlying skin and eventually develops draining sinus tracts that drain watery, purulent, or caseous material or cutaneous abscesses [125,126,127,128]. Orificial TB is a less common manifestation of cutaneous TB. The infection spreads from advanced pulmonary, intestinal, or genitourinary TB and causes painful ulcerative disease near orifices such as oral, perineal, and perirectal skin [125,126,127,128]. Lupus vulgaris is the chronic form of CTB that produces lesions of individual plaques or nodules with some ulceration and scarring [125,126,127,128]. Recent studies have reported atypical clinical presentations, such as diffused facial granulomas and scrofuloderma of cheek and neck among CTB cases [129,130]. A less common form of hematogenous spread from a pulmonary source in infants and children results in TB cutis miliaris disseminate. It occurs in immunocompromised individuals, such as those with HIV or an exanthematous disease, such as measles or scarlet fever. Lesions are usually blue to brownish papules capped by vesicles and spread over the trunk, thighs, buttocks, and genitalia [125,126,127,128]. Tuberculous mastitis is a rare condition seen as solid, non-tender nodule or mass in the breast due to lymphatic involvement of underlying lymph nodes [125,126,127,128].
Diagnosing CTB is very challenging and involves history, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, smear, culture, histopathology, and molecular diagnosis from the lesions. TSTs have shown 33–96% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity for CTB [35]. Skin biopsy is an ideal sample for CTB diagnosis by AFB staining and/or the bacilli culture. A study using Lowenstein–Jensen (LJ) and BACTEC systems to diagnose CTB cases including lupus vulgaris, scrofuloderma, tuberculosis verrucosa cutis, and scrofulous gumma showed a pooled sensitivity of 74.3%, indicating that culture is essential for CTB diagnosis [131]. The molecular test involving PCR is a rapid and easy diagnosis of cutaneous TB. The sensitivity and specificity of a PCR test using MBP64 to diagnose skin biopsy is 25% and 73.7%, respectively (Table 2) [37]. Histopathology reveals lymphocytes, epithelioid histiocytes, and Langerhans giant cells. However, different forms of CTB differ in their granuloma presentation. Tuberculous chancre, tuberculosis verrucosa cutis, and orificial TB show granulomas with caseous necrosis of moderate intensity, while necrotizing neutrophilic infiltrate is seen in tuberculosis chancre. Lupus vulgaris shows well-formed granulomas with rare necrotic caseation, while scrofuloderma has less intense granuloma with predominant caseating necrosis [35,125,127,132].
Treatment of CTB involves using ATDs similar to PTB therapy [43,44,45,46] (Table 3). Surgical excision and debridement (Table 1) are also recommended for scrofuloderma lesions, lupus vulgaris, or tuberculosis verrucosa cutis [35,127,128,133].

4.2. Musculoskeletal Tuberculosis

Musculoskeletal TB (MSTB) is a common form of EPTB with the involvement of skeletal, muscular, and musculoskeletal components. In general, MSTB remains guile for long periods, and there is a delay in the differential diagnosis as TB. The musculoskeletal involvement is mostly due to the hematogenous spread of primary disease in children, typically in TB endemic countries, and reactivation of LTBI in adults in developed countries [134]. Osteoarticular lesions usually occur in MSTB due to hematogenous spread from the primary site of infection. Any bone, joint, or bursa can be infected, but the major weight-bearing bones, such as the spine, hip, and knee, are the most prevalent infection sites, representing 70% to 80% of MSTB cases [135]. Vertebral or spinal TB is the most predominant form of MSTB, with an incidence of 1–2% of all TB cases [135,136]. Spinal TB (also called Pott’s disease) clinically manifests into constitutional, localized, or both. Constitutional symptoms usually mimic active TB and occur in 20–30% of MSTB cases and include fever, malaise, loss of body weight, and night sweats [134,137,138,139]. In about 90% of spinal TB cases, back pain was the most common symptom. Spinal deformity and associated paraplegia and kyphosis of varying degrees have been observed in children and adults with MSTB [134,140,141]. Paraspinal abscesses are quite common in vertebral TB, occurring in more than 90% of cases. The abscess may extend to adjacent ligaments and soft tissues as well as the epidural space [134,138,139]. Neurologic deficits are usually associated with children, while adults with spinal TB have a weakness, numbness, tingling sensation, and loss of motor functions [140,142].
Apart from the spine, other major bones are involved and result in a range of conditions, such as tuberculous arthritis, tuberculous osteomyelitis, tuberculous tenosynovitis, and prosthetic joint infections. Tuberculous arthritis usually affects major joints, including the hip and knee, along with other joints such as the shoulder, ankle, elbow, and wrist, but in all cases, it is mostly monoarticular. The clinical symptoms include slow progressive painful swelling, synovial hypertrophy, and effusion [134,143]. Tuberculous osteomyelitis usually occurs in conjunction with tuberculous arthritis, although it can be independent of joint involvement. In adults, long bones such as femur or humerus are typically affected, while in children, it is usually short bones of the hands and feet, resulting in tuberculous dactylitis [144,145,146,147,148]. Tenosynovitis usually occurs in association with skeletal TB and involves the tendon sheath of hands and wrist. Carpel tunnel syndrome is a common form of tuberculous synovitis [149,150]. Previous studies have shown the involvement of various bones—including vertebral (49–54%), joints (26%), knee (13–18%), hip (8–16%), ankle/foot (8%), elbow (4%), and wrist involvement (1–4%)—and joints to various proportions [151,152].
Differential diagnosis of MSTB is conducted by clinical and radiologic examination. Imaging of the affected area is performed using conventional X-rays, CT, or MRI to assess the damage. Fine-needle aspiration or biopsy of the affected site is recommended for microbiological and histological diagnosis of MSTB. Using the sample, AFB, culture, as well as molecular testing and histopathology are carried out. In addition, the synovial fluid ADA levels can be helpful in TB diagnosis with a cut-off value of ≥31 U/L. The sensitivity and specificity for the ADA test have been indicated at 83.3% and 96.7%, respectively, for TB arthritis [38]. A pilot study of IGRA using T-SPOT-TB for TB arthritis has shown a specificity of 83% and specificity of 86% when used for the synovial fluid mononuclear cells [39]. A previous study on joint TB has reported a sensitivity of 82.65% and specificity of 91% using PCR [40]. Since Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra have a sensitivity of 97% and 96% with a specificity of 94% and 97%, respectively, over MRS in the adult synovial fluid sample, they may be used as an initial diagnostic test (Table 2) [20].
The treatment guideline for bone, joint, and spine include medical chemotherapy and surgical intervention, wherever required. Chemotherapy for MSTB consists of a shorter, 6- to 9-month regimen of standard ATDs or the more extended 18-month regimen, which excludes RIF [21,22,43,44,45,46]. In case of difficulty in assessing any response and in non-complicated cases, the chemotherapy may be extended to 12 months (Table 3). Patients who do not respond effectively to chemotherapy or those with neurological deficit, cord compression, spinal instability, or kyphosis to a variable extent, particularly children, need surgical intervention (Table 1). In cold abscesses and sinus tract involvement, which are usually seen in patients with HIV, debridement and/or drainage (Table 1) is required [134,153,154,155,156].

5. Tuberculosis of the Abdomen and Genitourinary System

This section includes the abdominal (gastrointestinal tract, peritoneum, lymph node, and viscera, such as liver, spleen, and pancreas) and genitourinary (kidney and urinary tract; male and female reproductive organs) TB.

5.1. Abdominal Tuberculosis

Abdominal tuberculosis (AbTB) includes TB of the gastrointestinal tract, peritoneum, lymph nodes, and solid viscera. TB in these organs accounts for nearly 12% of all the EPTB cases [157]. AbTB is rarely primary and usually occurs by hematogenous transmission of bacilli from PTB or spread from adjacent organs with active disease, and rarely by ingestion of infected sputum. Gastrointestinal tuberculosis (GITB) includes TB of the GI tract from the esophagus to the anus, although the ileocecal disease is the most common form. The predominant symptoms of GITB are abdominal pain, fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Depending on the affected site, the pathological features vary from perforations, obliterations, ulceration, hypertrophy, ulcerohypertrophy, fistulae, and strictures [157].
Along with GITB, the involvement of lymph nodes or lymphadenopathy is usually observed. The most commonly involved lymph nodes are the mesenteric nodes, omental nodes, porta hepatis, the celiac axis, and the peripancreatic area. TB peritonitis is a common form of EPTB seen among patients with immunosuppression therapy, HIV infection, renal failure, and cirrhosis. As a subacute disease, TB peritonitis progress with a slow onset of symptoms, including fever, night sweats, abdominal pain, and ascites. The pathologic condition is categorized into wet ascites, fibrotic and/or dry plastic-type with a combination of one or more types usually observed. TB of the visceral organs, including the liver, spleen, and pancreas, are rarely involved in isolation; instead, they develop the disease as a secondary site and usually occur through hematogenous spread [2,158,159,160,161].
Diagnosis of AbTB is exceptionally challenging as it mimics other chronic diseases, such as malignancy, Crohn’s disease, and irritable bowel syndrome. Radiological techniques, including CT or MRI, are usually performed to evaluate the extent of diseases, such as ascites, thickening of the peritoneum, lymphadenopathy, and bowel strictures [162]. Endoscopy is used to discriminate the ulcerative, hypertrophic, and ulcerative hypertrophic type of damage to the affected organs. Endoscopy, colonoscopy, laparoscopy, and ultrasound-guided aspiration and biopsy are also used to obtain samples for histopathology, AFB, and bacterial culture tests. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and anemia are commonly observed in blood profiling of AbTB cases [163,164,165,166,167]. In addition, ADA levels in ascitic fluid (36–40 U/L) were used to diagnose peritoneal TB with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity (Table 2), while T-SPOT-TB indicated 90% sensitivity and 78% specificity when peritoneal fluid was used for TBP diagnosis [41,168]. Early histological changes of AbTB include caseous necrosis in an epithelioid granuloma, granulomatous lesions, lymphocyte aggregation, mucositis, and giant cell formation at the site of Mtb infection [163,165,169,170,171,172,173]. Molecular diagnosis using PCR (MBP64 or IS6110) and multiplex PCR targeting MPB64 and IS6110 regions of Mtb showed 35–65% and 75.7% sensitivity, respectively, with 100% specificity [42]. Xpert MTB/RIF has a sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 97% over MRS in an adult peritoneal fluid sample and may be used as an initial diagnostic test (Table 2) [20].
AbTB is generally responsive to standard ATDs used to treat PTB [43,44,45,46] (Table 3). Surgery is recommended (Table 1) only when irreversible constrictions, strictures, abscesses, and fistula formation cause damage to the GI tract or other internal organs in the abdomen [158,159,174,175].

5.2. Genitourinary Tuberculosis

Genitourinary tuberculosis (GUTB) makes up to 20% of all EPTB. Usually, GUTB occurs by hematogenous spread of bacilli from the primary disease sites such as the lung and reactivation of LTBI due to immunosuppression. Kidneys are the primary organ affected in GUTB, where the disease progresses slowly and is mostly asymptomatic but can be highly destructive to the organ. TB of the kidney may even lead to renal dysfunction and renal failure. The disease usually manifests as a secondary infection in the bladder and ureter following kidneys, with extensive calcification of affected organs. Constitutional symptoms, including fever, weight loss, and sweating, are observed along with urologic symptoms, such as flank pain, pyuria, hematuria, and even urinary incontinence. There is usually no improvement after treatment with antibiotics for 5–7 days. Genital TB can affect many male genital tract organs, including the prostate, seminal vesicles, vas deferens, epididymis, Cooper glands, penis, and testicles. It typically shows tender scrotal swelling, irregular/nodular prostate, genital ulcer, and perineal sinus or fistula, leading to male infertility. TB of the female genital tract mostly affects the fallopian tubes. However, ovaries, endometrium, and peritoneum can also be affected, and symptoms are mistaken for menstrual irregularity, abdominal pain, pelvic inflammatory disease, and even infertility [176,177,178,179,180].
Chest X-ray is indicative of active PTB or healed lesions in the case of LTBI. Further imaging of affected organs using radiographic imaging, intravenous urography, ultrasonography, and CT should be performed to assess the abnormalities, fibrosis, calcification or thickening, or possible ulceration. Sterile pyuria is a classical finding in GUTB. In these cases, it is essential to culture the infecting bacilli from urine and/or biopsy samples of affected sites. The presence of AFB can also be visualized from these samples by staining. Histology studies of fine-needle aspiration or biopsy samples show classical epithelioid cell granuloma with caseating necrosis. Compared to urine Mtb culture tests with a sensitivity and specificity of 23.3% and 100%, respectively, PCR tests performed in urine samples using Mtb IS6110, MPT64, and 16S rRNA primers had a pooled sensitivity and specificities of 88.6% and 96.5%, respectively [181]. A previous report also showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 91%, respectively, for Xpert MTB/RIF in detecting GUTB using urine samples [182].
Treatment of GUTB includes standard ATD chemotherapy as prescribed for PTB. Wherever drug resistance is observed, second-line ATD is incorporated as per the American Thoracic Society (ATS) or WHO guidelines [43,44,45,46]. (Table 3). Surgical intervention is required in some GUTB cases and includes ablative surgery for partial or total nephrectomy, epididymis, urinary bladder, or fallopian tubes. Reconstruction surgery or stenting is performed in the ureters or bladder when the abnormality is irreversible. Percutaneous drainage of the affected organ is recommended when abscesses are involved (Table 1) [183,184,185,186,187].

6. Miliary Tuberculosis

Miliary tuberculosis (MiliTB) is a fatal form of disseminated TB developed by hematogenous spread from a primary locus. It can affect infants, young children, and older adults with predisposing co-morbidities, such as malnutrition, HIV infection, treatment with immunosuppressants, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease, and malignancy. The common symptoms of MiliTB are fever, malaise, anorexia, weight loss, and cough with septicemia. Specific disease symptoms are also observed depending on the organ involved and usually show cutaneous lesions (Tuberculosis cutis miliaris disseminate), choroidal tubercles, and commonly TBM. Atypical complications, including acute distress respiratory syndrome, pneumothorax, severe kidney injury, lymphadenopathy, cardiac, hepatic, and gastrointestinal manifestations, as well as immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, are also observed in MiliTB cases [188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195].
Diagnosis of MiliTB involves a combination of laboratory diagnosis, imaging, microbiological and molecular methods. Chest X-ray usually shows a miliary pattern, while high-resolution CT imaging specifically identifies miliary nodules, ground-glass opacities, and interlobular septal thickening. Depending on the organs involved, other diagnostic imaging, including ultrasound, MRI, Positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), or echocardiography, is recommended to assess the extent of organ damage. The blood profiling of MiliTB usually shows anemia, lymphopenia, pancytopenia, and elevated transaminase, bilirubin, ESR, and CRP. Sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), or other fluids (pleural, peritoneal, pericardial, ascitic, CSF) and biopsy specimens are used for biochemical, microbiological, histopathological, and molecular testing of MiliTB, and individual sensitivity and specificity depends on the organ involved. AFB smear and bacterial culture are generally positive for mycobacteria in MiliTB. Histopathology shows caseating granuloma with necrosis. Molecular methods such as PCR or Xpert MTB/RIF, or Line Probe Assay (LiPA) can rapidly diagnose MiliTB cases. Drug-susceptibility testing is vital to confirm the susceptibility of infecting Mtb to ATDs [192,193,196,197,198,199,200,201,202]. Since HIV-positive adult blood samples showed 56% sensitivity and 94% specificity for Xpert MTB/RIF, this method is recommended by the WHO as an initial diagnostic test [20].
Treatment of MiliTB cases without meningeal involvement includes standard ATD therapy as recommended for PTB. In the case of MiliTB existing with TBM, treatment is continued for up to 12 months. Wherever drug resistance is observed, second-line ATD is incorporated as per the ATS or WHO guidelines [43,44,45,46] (Table 3). Corticosteroids, such as prednisone, are beneficial as adjuvants for MiliTB, in which TBM, pleuritis, or pericarditis is also observed. When MiliTB co-exists with HIV infection, antiretroviral therapy should be started according to the WHO recommendations, with rifabutin replacing RIF in the ATD. Surgery is recommended (Table 1) where organ damage is irreversible [192,193,199,203,204].

7. Rising Trend of Drug-Resistant Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis

An increased number of drug-resistant EPTB (DR-EPTB) cases have been reported in the last decade, which poses significant challenges to diagnose and treat. Since EPTB is less contagious than pulmonary TB, it is often ignored during initial diagnosis; however, the rising trend in DR-EPTB cases redefines the focus and warrants immediate attention for intervention. Previous studies have reported 16–20% of EP-TB cases with collective drug resistance. Among the DR EP-TB cases, studies reported maximum resistance to isoniazid (8–14%), while the frequency of rifampicin monoresistance (2.4–3.9%) and MDR (2.0–10.0%) cases were comparatively low [205,206,207,208,209,210]. DR-EPTB case detection rate has increased due to the application of advanced molecular diagnostic methods, such as the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) and LiPA. Lymph nodes, bone and pleura, are the most common organs involved in DR-EPTB reported worldwide. Interestingly, fewer DR-EPTB cases were reported among DM patients than non-DM cases [211]. In addition, INH resistance was more predominant than RIF resistance in the DR-EPTB cases [207,211,212,213,214].
Rapid diagnosis of EPTB using molecular tools, such as Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF, is recommended by the WHO [1]. The improved or re-engineered version Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra has significantly better performance (increased sensitivity for paucibacillary specimens albeit decreased specificity) than the current Xpert MTB/RIF. Studies have shown that Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra performs better for pediatric and adult extrapulmonary samples. These studies have recommended the use of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in low-TB burden settings. However, this approach needs more evaluation for its use in high-TB burden countries to strengthen its performance [215,216]. Detailed reviews on the diagnostic utility of Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF in EP-TB have recently been published [217,218].
The WHO released recommendations for the diagnosis of EPTB in 2020 for adults and children. It suggested Xpert MTB/RIF or Xpert Ultra should replace smear microscopy/culture for primary diagnosis of CSF sample, mainly when the sample volume is low or no additional sample can be drawn. However, it may replace smear microscopy/culture for other non-respiratory specimens such as lymph node aspirate, lymph node biopsy, pleural fluid, peritoneal fluid, pericardial fluid, or synovial fluid. Xpert Ultra may be used as an initial diagnostic test for lymph node aspirate or biopsy over smear microscopy/culture. Though conventional methods are preferred over MTB/RIF for urine, blood, and stool samples, Xpert Ultra can also be used for urine specimens in adults/children with suspected EP-TB and the blood samples of HIV-positive adults/children with signs and symptoms of disseminated EP-TB. A single negative result with MTB/RIF requires further diagnosis with conventional microscopy, histopathology, and culture with the sample and does not rule out the condition. Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra is recommended to detect RIF resistance over conventional culture and phenotypic DST. The WHO recommends microscopy and culture to assess treatment outcomes and phenotypic DST to determine other ATDs. Although other molecular tests, including TB-LAMP and LiPA, are evaluated for their use in sputum samples of PTB, no recommendations are available from the WHO to use these tests for EP-TB samples as the initial diagnostic test [219].
There were country-specific differences in the distribution of DR-EPTB as compared to PTB cases. While DR-PTB has been reported to be higher than DR-EPTB in Pakistan, the trend of these two conditions remained similar in Korea and India. A higher trend of MDR and pre-extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR) cases was noted in Ethiopia [207,208,210,213,219,220]. Globally, the percentage of MDR-TB isolated from EPTB cases ranged between 2.2% and 19.5%. In contrast, individual RIF and INH resistance was 1.7–8% and 7.6–37%, respectively, in studies carried out in countries including Thailand, China, Ethiopia, Korea, Pakistan, and India [206,207,208,210,213,214,220]. With INH resistance showing prominence across the globe, it is recommended to perform additional molecular tests such as line probe assays for better patient management.
Patients with DR-EPTB are recommended the same regimen as DR-TB using a shorter or longer regimen (Table 3) based on drug susceptibility, previous history of tuberculosis, symptoms, age, co-morbidities, and adverse drug reaction monitoring as a few considerations [43,44,45,46]. Adverse drug reactions to anti-TB drugs include gastrointestinal disturbance, hepatotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy, psychiatric disorders, optic neuritis, ototoxicity, renal toxicity, cardiac toxicity/arrhythmias, arthralgia, and skin reactions that vary in intensity from one case to another. These add to the existing burden of poor treatment outcomes, non-compliance to treatment, and death. The WHO has added newer drugs to DR treatment with bedaquiline and delamanid, offering promise to an all-oral regimen [46,211,221,222]. In summary, the management of DR-EPTB is crucial and challenging and currently neglected across the globe.

8. Summary and Conclusions

The “End TB Strategy”, established by the WHO, aims to reduce TB deaths by 95% and new cases by 90% in 2035. Achieving this goal involves applying improved diagnosis, treatment, and better vaccines to fight against TB. In addition to PTB, it is imperative to address the impact of EPTB and its rising drug resistance on global health and the economy to control these diseases worldwide. An early and accurate diagnosis and drug susceptibility testing are essential to initiate the correct treatment regimen without delay. A summary of commonly used diagnostic tests for various EPTB conditions is presented in Figure 1.
While the standard ATDs used in PTB is also approved to treat most of the EPTB cases, the duration and effectiveness of treatment vary strikingly, depending on the nature of disease manifestation and the organ involved. The increasing trend in DR-EPTB cases further adds to the disease burden. In TBM, ocular TB, and pericarditis, treatment with corticosteroids as adjuvants to antimicrobial drugs can be beneficial. Surgery is recommended for patients where the organ damage is irreversible, such as bone, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary mycobacterial diseases. The complexities associated with EPTB and DR-EPTB management highlight the urgent need to develop additional, advanced tools for early and rapid diagnosis, and more efficient treatment regimens.

Author Contributions

R.G. and S.S. conceived the concept and designed the outline. R.G. wrote the original manuscript. All authors contributed, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article. No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. Available online: (accessed on 16 April 2021).
  2. Golden, M.P.; Vikram, H.R. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: An overview. Am. Fam. Phys. 2005, 72, 1761–1768. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sharma, S.K.; Mohan, A.; Kohli, M. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gopalaswamy, R.; Shanmugam, S.; Mondal, R.; Subbian, S. Of tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections - a comparative analysis of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mechai, F.; Bouchaud, O. Tuberculous meningitis: Challenges in diagnosis and management. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 175, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wilkinson, R.J.; Rohlwink, U.; Misra, U.K.; van Crevel, R.; Mai, N.T.H.; Dooley, K.E.; Caws, M.; Figaji, A.; Savic, R.; Solomons, R.; et al. Tuberculous meningitis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017, 13, 581–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Leonard, J.M. Central Nervous System Tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garg, R.K. Tuberculosis of the central nervous system. Postgrad. Med. J. 1999, 75, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Rock, R.B.; Olin, M.; Baker, C.A.; Molitor, T.W.; Peterson, P.K. Central nervous system tuberculosis: Pathogenesis and clinical aspects. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 21, 243–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Wang, M.S.; Zhao, M.; Liu, X.J. Risk factors for poor outcome in childhood tuberculous meningitis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ekermans, P.; Duse, A.; George, J. The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  12. Pormohammad, A.; Riahi, S.M.; Nasiri, M.J.; Fallah, F.; Aghazadeh, M.; Doustdar, F.; Pouriran, R. Diagnostic test accuracy of adenosine deaminase for tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 2017, 74, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lu, D.; Chen, C.; Yu, S.; Chen, S. Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis Using a Combination of Peripheral Blood T-SPOT.TB and Cerebrospinal Fluid Interferon-gamma Detection Methods. Lab. Med. 2016, 47, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  14. Luo, Y.; Xue, Y.; Guo, X.; Lin, Q.; Mao, L.; Tang, G.; Song, H.; Wang, F.; Sun, Z. Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Garg, R.K. Microbiological diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: Phenotype to genotype. Indian J. Med. Res. 2019, 150, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Garg, R.K.; Malhotra, H.S.; Jain, A. Neuroimaging in tuberculous meningitis. Neurol. India 2016, 64, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sanei Taheri, M.; Karimi, M.A.; Haghighatkhah, H.; Pourghorban, R.; Samadian, M.; Delavar Kasmaei, H. Central nervous system tuberculosis: An imaging-focused review of a reemerging disease. Radiol. Res. Pract. 2015, 2015, 202806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berwal, A.; Chawla, K.; Vishwanath, S.; Shenoy, V.P. Role of multiplex polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing tubercular meningitis. J. Lab. Phys. 2017, 9, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, G.; Shen, Y.; Zhong, F.; Ye, B.; Yang, J.; Chen, G. Diagnostic accuracy of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. WHO. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis Module 3: Diagnosis—Rapid Diagnostics for Tuberculosis Detection. Available online: (accessed on 16 April 2021).
  21. Duo, L.; Ying, B.; Song, X.; Lu, X.; Ye, Y.; Fan, H.; Xin, J.; Wang, L. Molecular profile of drug resistance in tuberculous meningitis from southwest china. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 1067–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  22. Gupta, R.; Thakur, R.; Gupta, P.; Jalan, N.; Kushwaha, S.; Gupta, M.; Gupta, P.; Aggarwal, A.; Manchanda, V. Evaluation of Geno Type MTBDRplus Line Probe Assay for Early Detection of Drug Resistance in Tuberculous Meningitis Patients in India. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2015, 7, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bhatta, S.; Singh, S.; Chalise, S.R. Cytopathological patterns of tuberculous lymphadenitis: An analysis of 126 cases in a tertiary care hospital. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 1898–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Q.; Li, W.; Chen, Y.; Du, X.; Wang, C.; Liang, B.; Tang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Tao, C.; He, J.Q. Performance of interferon-gamma release assay in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis: A meta-analysis. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  25. Tadesse, M.; Abebe, G.; Abdissa, K.; Bekele, A.; Bezabih, M.; Apers, L.; Colebunders, R.; Rigouts, L. Concentration of lymph node aspirate improves the sensitivity of acid fast smear microscopy for the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis in Jimma, southwest Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  26. Derese, Y.; Hailu, E.; Assefa, T.; Bekele, Y.; Mihret, A.; Aseffa, A.; Hussien, J.; Ali, I.; Abebe, M. Comparison of PCR with standard culture of fine needle aspiration samples in the diagnosis of tuberculosis lymphadenitis. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2012, 6, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yurt, S.; Kucukergin, C.; Yigitbas, B.A.; Seckin, S.; Tigin, H.C.; Kosar, A.F. Diagnostic utility of serum and pleural levels of adenosine deaminase 1-2, and interferon-gamma in the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis. Multidiscip. Respir. Med. 2014, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  28. Luo, Y.; Yan, F.; Xue, Y.; Mao, L.; Lin, Q.; Tang, G.; Song, H.; Wu, S.; Ouyang, R.; Yuan, X.; et al. Diagnostic utility of pleural fluid T-SPOT and interferon-gamma for tuberculous pleurisy: A two-center prospective cohort study in China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 99, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Trajman, A.; Kaisermann, C.; Luiz, R.R.; Sperhacke, R.D.; Rossetti, M.L.; Feres Saad, M.H.; Sardella, I.G.; Spector, N.; Kritski, A.L. Pleural fluid ADA, IgA-ELISA and PCR sensitivities for the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2007, 67, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Raj, A.; Singh, N.; Gupta, K.B.; Chaudhary, D.; Yadav, A.; Chaudhary, A.; Agarwal, K.; Varma-Basil, M.; Prasad, R.; Khuller, G.K.; et al. Comparative Evaluation of Several Gene Targets for Designing a Multiplex-PCR for an Early Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis. Yonsei Med. J. 2016, 57, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Chau, E.; Sarkarati, M.; Spellberg, B. Adenosine Deaminase Diagnostic Testing in Pericardial Fluid. JAMA 2019, 322, 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seo, H.T.; Kim, Y.S.; Ock, H.S.; Kang, L.H.; Byun, K.S.; Jeon, D.S.; Kim, S.J. Diagnostic performance of interferon-gamma release assay for diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2020, 74, e13479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cegielski, J.P.; Devlin, B.H.; Morris, A.J.; Kitinya, J.N.; Pulipaka, U.P.; Lema, L.E.; Lwakatare, J.; Reller, L.B. Comparison of PCR, culture, and histopathology for diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 3254–3257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  34. Hu, X.; Xing, B.; Wang, W.; Yang, P.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, X.; Shang, Y.; Chen, F.; Liu, N.; Yang, L.; et al. Diagnostic values of Xpert MTB/RIF, T-SPOT.TB and adenosine deaminase for HIV-negative tuberculous pericarditis in a high burden setting: A prospective observational study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Santos, J.B.; Figueiredo, A.R.; Ferraz, C.E.; Oliveira, M.H.; Silva, P.G.; Medeiros, V.L. Cutaneous tuberculosis: Diagnosis, histopathology and treatment—Part II. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2014, 89, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  36. Agarwal, P.; Singh, E.N.; Agarwal, U.S.; Meena, R.; Purohit, S.; Kumar, S. The role of DNA polymerase chain reaction, culture and histopathology in the diagnosis of cutaneous tuberculosis. Int. J. Dermatol. 2017, 56, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Suthar, C.; Rana, T.; Singh, U.B.; Singh, M.; Ramesh, V.; Sharma, V.K.; Ramam, M. mRNA and DNA PCR tests in cutaneous tuberculosis. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2013, 79, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Foocharoen, C.; Sarntipipattana, C.; Foocharoen, T.; Mahakkanukrauh, A.; Paupairoj, A.; Teerajetgul, Y.; Nanagara, R. Synovial fluid adenosine deaminase activity to diagnose tuberculous septic arthritis. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2011, 42, 331–337. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cheng, X.H.; Bian, S.N.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhang, L.F.; Shi, X.C.; Yang, B.; Zhang, F.C.; Liu, X.Q. Diagnostic Value of T-cell Interferon-gamma Release Assays on Synovial Fluid for Articular Tuberculosis: A Pilot Study. Chin. Med. J. 2016, 129, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, Y.S.; Lou, S.Q.; Wen, J.M.; Lv, W.X.; Jiao, C.G.; Yang, S.M.; Xu, H.B. Clinical value of polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of joint tuberculosis by detecting the DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Orthop. Surg. 2011, 3, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, Y.; Xue, Y.; Mao, L.; Lin, Q.; Tang, G.; Song, H.; Wang, F.; Sun, Z. Diagnostic Value of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Peritonitis: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 585180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hallur, V.; Sharma, M.; Sethi, S.; Sharma, K.; Mewara, A.; Dhatwalia, S.; Yadav, R.; Bhasin, D.; Sinha, S.K.; Rana, S.; et al. Development and evaluation of multiplex PCR in rapid diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 76, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nahid, P.; Dorman, S.E.; Alipanah, N.; Barry, P.M.; Brozek, J.L.; Cattamanchi, A.; Chaisson, L.H.; Chaisson, R.E.; Daley, C.L.; Grzemska, M.; et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, e147–e195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nahid, P.; Mase, S.R.; Migliori, G.B.; Sotgiu, G.; Bothamley, G.H.; Brozek, J.L.; Cattamanchi, A.; Cegielski, J.P.; Chen, L.; Daley, C.L.; et al. Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 200, e93–e142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. WHO. Guidelines for Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis and Patient Care (2017 Update). Available online: (accessed on 16 April 2021).
  46. WHO. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. Available online: (accessed on 16 April 2021).
  47. Murthy, J.M.K. Tuberculous Meningitis—Adjunctive Therapy: Corticosteroids, Aspirin, or Both. Neurol. India 2019, 67, 1003–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Prasad, K.; Singh, M.B.; Ryan, H. Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 4, CD002244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  49. Thwaites, G.E. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous meningitis. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2013, 26, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  50. Gandhare, A.; Mahashur, A. Tuberculosis of the lymph nodes: Many facets, many hues. Astrocytes 2017, 4, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gautam, H.; Agrawal, S.K.; Verma, S.K.; Singh, U.B. Cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis: Clinical profile and diagnostic modalities. Int. J. Mycobacteriol. 2018, 7, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bayazit, Y.A.; Bayazit, N.; Namiduru, M. Mycobacterial cervical lymphadenitis. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 2004, 66, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Handa, U.; Mundi, I.; Mohan, S. Nodal tuberculosis revisited: A review. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2012, 6, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  54. Sattar, A.; Shamim, S.H.; Wahab, S.; Javed, A. Yield and Safety Profile of Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of Lymph Nodes. J. Coll. Phys. Surg. Pak. 2016, 26, 357–360. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sellami, M.; Charfi, S.; Chaabouni, M.A.; Mrabet, S.; Charfeddine, I.; Ayadi, L.; Kallel, S.; Ghorbel, A. Fine needle non-aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of cervical lymph node tuberculosis: A single center experience. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2019, 85, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jha, B.C.; Dass, A.; Nagarkar, N.M.; Gupta, R.; Singhal, S. Cervical tuberculous lymphadenopathy: Changing clinical pattern and concepts in management. Postgrad. Med. J. 2001, 77, 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  57. Som, P.; Curtin, H. Head and Neck Imaging—2 Volume Set, 5th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ko, Y.; Kim, C.; Park, Y.B.; Mo, E.K.; Moon, J.W.; Park, S.; Sim, Y.S.; Hong, J.Y.; Baek, M.S. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Definitive Versus Standard Anti-Tuberculosis Therapy in Patients with Tuberculous Lymphadenitis. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  59. Seok, H.; Jeon, J.H.; Oh, K.H.; Choi, H.K.; Choi, W.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Seo, H.S.; Kwon, S.Y.; Park, D.W. Characteristics of residual lymph nodes after six months of antituberculous therapy in HIV-negative individuals with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Van Loenhout-Rooyackers, J.H.; Laheij, R.J.; Richter, C.; Verbeek, A.L. Shortening the duration of treatment for cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. Eur. Respir. J. 2000, 15, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Albert, D.M.; Raven, M.L. Ocular Tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  62. Betzler, B.K.; Gupta, V.; Agrawal, R. Clinics of ocular tuberculosis: A review. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2021, 49, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gupta, V.; Shoughy, S.S.; Mahajan, S.; Khairallah, M.; Rosenbaum, J.T.; Curi, A.; Tabbara, K.F. Clinics of ocular tuberculosis. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2015, 23, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abouammoh, M.; Abu El-Asrar, A.M. Imaging in the diagnosis and management of ocular tuberculosis. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 2012, 52, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Agarwal, A.; Mahajan, S.; Khairallah, M.; Mahendradas, P.; Gupta, A.; Gupta, V. Multimodal Imaging in Ocular Tuberculosis. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2017, 25, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Solmaz, N.; Onder, F.; Demir, N.; Altuntas Aydin, O. Primary Conjunctival Tuberculosis. Turk. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 48, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wroblewski, K.J.; Hidayat, A.A.; Neafie, R.C.; Rao, N.A.; Zapor, M. Ocular tuberculosis: A clinicopathologic and molecular study. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sharma, K.; Gupta, V.; Bansal, R.; Sharma, A.; Sharma, M.; Gupta, A. Novel multi-targeted polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of presumed tubercular uveitis. J. Ophthalmic Inflamm. Infect. 2013, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  69. Balne, P.K.; Barik, M.R.; Sharma, S.; Basu, S. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay targeting the mpb64 gene for diagnosis of intraocular tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 3839–3840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  70. Sharma, K.; Gupta, A.; Sharma, M.; Sharma, A.; Singh, R.; Aggarwal, K.; Bansal, R.; Thakur, A.; Prakash, S.; Gupta, V. MTBDRplus for the rapid diagnosis of ocular tuberculosis and screening of drug resistance. Eye 2018, 32, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sharma, K.; Gupta, V.; Sharma, A.; Singh, R.; Sharma, M.; Aggarwal, K.; Bansal, R.; Fiorella, P.D.; Prakash, S.; Gupta, A. Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of intra-ocular tuberculosis from vitreous fluid samples. Tuberculosis 2017, 102, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Anibarro, L.; Cortes, E.; Chouza, A.; Parafita-Fernandez, A.; Garcia, J.C.; Pena, A.; Fernandez-Cid, C.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, A. Early treatment of tuberculous uveitis improves visual outcome: A 10-year cohort study. Infection 2018, 46, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Figueira, L.; Fonseca, S.; Ladeira, I.; Duarte, R. Ocular tuberculosis: Position paper on diagnosis and treatment management. Rev. Port. Pneumol. 2017, 23, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Goyal, J.L.; Jain, P.; Arora, R.; Dokania, P. Ocular manifestations of tuberculosis. Indian J. Tuberc. 2015, 62, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kee, A.R.; Gonzalez-Lopez, J.J.; Al-Hity, A.; Gupta, B.; Lee, C.S.; Gunasekeran, D.V.; Jayabalan, N.; Grant, R.; Kon, O.M.; Gupta, V.; et al. Anti-tubercular therapy for intraocular tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2016, 61, 628–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  76. Shakarchi, F.I. Ocular tuberculosis: Current perspectives. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2015, 9, 2223–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  77. Ganesh, S.K.; Abraham, S.; Sudharshan, S. Paradoxical reactions in ocular tuberculosis. J. Ophthalmic Inflamm. Infect. 2019, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  78. Rathinam, S.R.; Lalitha, P. Paradoxical worsening of ocular tuberculosis in HIV patients after antiretroviral therapy. Eye 2007, 21, 667–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Gupta, G.; Khattak, B.P.; Agrawal, V. Primary gingival tuberculosis: A rare clinical entity. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2011, 2, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Rivera, H.; Correa, M.F.; Castillo-Castillo, S.; Nikitakis, N.G. Primary oral tuberculosis: A report of a case diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction. Oral Dis. 2003, 9, 46–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Tandon, S.; Bhandari, V.; Kaur Lamba, A.; Faraz, F.; Makker, K.; Aggarwal, K. Literature review of oral tuberculosis and report of a case with unique histological presentation. Indian J. Tuberc. 2020, 67, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Verma, S.; Mohan, R.P.; Singh, U.; Agarwal, N. Primary oral tuberculosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  83. Eng, H.L.; Lu, S.Y.; Yang, C.H.; Chen, W.J. Oral tuberculosis. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1996, 81, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kolokotronis, A.; Antoniadis, D.; Trigonidis, G.; Papanagiotou, P. Oral tuberculosis. Oral Dis. 1996, 2, 242–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sansare, K.; Gupta, A.; Khanna, V.; Karjodkar, F. Oral tuberculosis: Unusual radiographic findings. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2011, 40, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  86. Wu, Y.H.; Chang, J.Y.; Sun, A.; Chiang, C.P. Oral tuberculosis. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2017, 116, 64–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  87. Jain, P.; Jain, I. Oral Manifestations of Tuberculosis: Step towards Early Diagnosis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, ZE18–ZE21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Krawiecka, E.; Szponar, E. Tuberculosis of the oral cavity: An uncommon but still a live issue. Postepy Dermatol. Alergol. 2015, 32, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sharma, S.; Bajpai, J.; Pathak, P.K.; Pradhan, A.; Singh, P.; Kant, S. Oral tuberculosis—Current concepts. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2019, 8, 1308–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Das, A.; Das, S.K.; Pandit, S.; Basuthakur, S. Tonsillar tuberculosis: A forgotten clinical entity. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2015, 4, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Al-Serhani, A.M.; Al-Mazrou, K. Pharyngeal tuberculosis. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2001, 22, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gokavarapu, S.; Panta, P. Oral lesions in Tuberculosis. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 2015, 22, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Goyal, S.; Sharma, S.; Diwaker, P. Diagnostic role and limitations of FNAC in oral and jaw swellings. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2015, 43, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Singh, S.; Garg, N.; Gupta, S.; Marwah, N.; Kalra, R.; Singh, V.; Sen, R. Fine needle aspiration cytology in lesions of oral and maxillofacial region: Diagnostic pitfalls. J. Cytol. 2011, 28, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Eguchi, J.; Ishihara, K.; Watanabe, A.; Fukumoto, Y.; Okuda, K. PCR method is essential for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in oral cavity samples. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 18, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chakrabarti, B.; Davies, P.D. Pleural tuberculosis. Monaldi Arch. Chest Dis. 2006, 65, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  97. Chiu, C.Y.; Wu, J.H.; Wong, K.S. Clinical spectrum of tuberculous pleural effusion in children. Pediatr. Int. 2007, 49, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fischer, G.B.; Andrade, C.F.; Lima, J.B. Pleural tuberculosis in children. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2011, 12, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Shaw, J.A.; Diacon, A.H.; Koegelenberg, C.F.N. Tuberculous pleural effusion. Respirology 2019, 24, 962–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Conde, M.B.; Loivos, A.C.; Rezende, V.M.; Soares, S.L.; Mello, F.C.; Reingold, A.L.; Daley, C.L.; Kritski, A.L. Yield of sputum induction in the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 167, 723–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vorster, M.J.; Allwood, B.W.; Diacon, A.H.; Koegelenberg, C.F. Tuberculous pleural effusions: Advances and controversies. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015, 7, 981–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lee, Y.C.; Rogers, J.T.; Rodriguez, R.M.; Miller, K.D.; Light, R.W. Adenosine deaminase levels in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions. Chest 2001, 120, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  103. Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Liang, Q.; Pan, L.; Duan, H.; Yang, Y.; Li, H.; Guo, C.; Sun, Q.; Jia, H.; et al. Use of T-SPOT.TB for the diagnosis of unconventional pleural tuberculosis is superior to ADA in high prevalence areas: A prospective analysis of 601 cases. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Beukes, A.; Shaw, J.A.; Diacon, A.H.; Irusen, E.M.; Koegelenberg, C.F.N. The Utility of Pleural Fluid Lactate Dehydrogenase to Adenosine Deaminase Ratio in Pleural Tuberculosis. Respiration 2021, 100, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhai, K.; Lu, Y.; Shi, H.Z. Tuberculous pleural effusion. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, E486–E494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  106. Irfan, M.; Idrees, F.; Jabeen, K.; Zubairi, A.B.S.; Butt, S.; Hasan, R. Accuracy of genotype MTBDRplus line probe assay in patients with tuberculous pleural effusion: Comparison with clinical and culture based diagnosis. Infect. Dis. 2020, 52, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Evans, D.J. The use of adjunctive corticosteroids in the treatment of pericardial, pleural and meningeal tuberculosis: Do they improve outcome? Respir. Med. 2008, 102, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  108. Ryan, H.; Yoo, J.; Darsini, P. Corticosteroids for tuberculous pleurisy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 3, CD001876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  109. Mayosi, B.M.; Burgess, L.J.; Doubell, A.F. Tuberculous pericarditis. Circulation 2005, 112, 3608–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  110. Ntsekhe, M.; Mayosi, B.M. Tuberculous pericarditis with and without HIV. Heart Fail. Rev. 2013, 18, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tse, G.; Ali, A.; Alpendurada, F.; Prasad, S.; Raphael, C.E.; Vassiliou, V. Tuberculous Constrictive Pericarditis. Res. Cardiovasc. Med. 2015, 4, e29614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  112. Isiguzo, G.; Du Bruyn, E.; Howlett, P.; Ntsekhe, M. Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculous Pericarditis: What Is New? Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2020, 22, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Naicker, K.; Ntsekhe, M. Tuberculous pericardial disease: A focused update on diagnosis, therapy and prevention of complications. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2020, 10, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Reuter, H.; Burgess, L.; van Vuuren, W.; Doubell, A. Diagnosing tuberculous pericarditis. QJM 2006, 99, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chetrit, M.; Natalie Szpakowski, N.; Desai, M.Y. Multimodality imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of constrictive pericarditis. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2019, 17, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hoey, E.T.; Shahid, M.; Watkin, R.W. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pericardial disease. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2016, 6, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  117. Xu, B.; Kwon, D.H.; Klein, A.L. Imaging of the Pericardium: A Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging Update. Cardiol. Clin. 2017, 35, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yu, W.Y.; Lu, P.X.; Assadi, M.; Huang, X.L.; Skrahin, A.; Rosenthal, A.; Gabrielian, A.; Tartakovsky, M.; Wang, Y.X.J. Updates on (18)F-FDG-PET/CT as a clinical tool for tuberculosis evaluation and therapeutic monitoring. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2019, 9, 1132–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Jung, H.O. Pericardial effusion and pericardiocentesis: Role of echocardiography. Korean Circ. J. 2012, 42, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Liebenberg, J.; van der Bijl, P. A “Vanishing”, Tuberculous, Pericardial Effusion. Korean Circ. J. 2016, 46, 879–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  121. Vakamudi, S.; Ho, N.; Cremer, P.C. Pericardial Effusions: Causes, Diagnosis, and Management. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 59, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Liebenberg, J.J.; Dold, C.J.; Olivier, L.R. A prospective investigation into the effect of colchicine on tuberculous pericarditis. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 2016, 27, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  123. Mayosi, B.M.; Ntsekhe, M.; Bosch, J.; Pandie, S.; Jung, H.; Gumedze, F.; Pogue, J.; Thabane, L.; Smieja, M.; Francis, V.; et al. Prednisolone and Mycobacterium indicus pranii in tuberculous pericarditis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1121–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  124. Wiysonge, C.S.; Ntsekhe, M.; Thabane, L.; Volmink, J.; Majombozi, D.; Gumedze, F.; Pandie, S.; Mayosi, B.M. Interventions for treating tuberculous pericarditis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 9, CD000526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  125. Barbagallo, J.; Tager, P.; Ingleton, R.; Hirsch, R.J.; Weinberg, J.M. Cutaneous tuberculosis: Diagnosis and treatment. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2002, 3, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Charifa, A.; Mangat, R.; Oakley, A.M. Cutaneous Tuberculosis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  127. Hill, M.K.; Sanders, C.V. Cutaneous Tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Van Zyl, L.; du Plessis, J.; Viljoen, J. Cutaneous tuberculosis overview and current treatment regimens. Tuberculosis 2015, 95, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Rimmalapudi, S.; Morey, A.D.; Madke, B.; Singh, A.L.; Jawade, S. A Rare Case of Tuberculosis Cutis Colliquative. J. Evol. Med. Dent. Sci. 2021, 10, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sabr, A.; Aloua, R.; Kerdoud, O.; Slimani, F. Scorfuloderma of cheek (a cutaneous tuberculosis colliquativa cutis): Case report. Ann. Med. Surg. 2021, 64, 102257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Aggarwal, P.; Singal, A.; Bhattacharya, S.N.; Mishra, K. Comparison of the radiometric BACTEC 460 TB culture system and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for the isolation of mycobacteria in cutaneous tuberculosis and their drug susceptibility pattern. Int. J. Dermatol. 2008, 47, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Min, K.W.; Ko, J.Y.; Park, C.K. Histopathological spectrum of cutaneous tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2012, 39, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Gunawan, H.; Achdiat, P.A.; Hindritiani, R.; Essary, E.D.; Ningtias, L.D.; Siregar, E.P.; Sori, P.R.; Febrina, D. Various cutaneous tuberculosis with rare clinical manifestations: A case series. Int. J. Mycobacteriol. 2018, 7, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Leonard, M.K.; Blumberg, H.M. Musculoskeletal Tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ludwig, B.; Lazarus, A.A. Musculoskeletal tuberculosis. Dis. Mon. 2007, 53, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Watts, H.G.; Lifeso, R.M. Tuberculosis of bones and joints. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1996, 78, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ali, A.; Musbahi, O.; White, V.L.C.; Montgomery, A.S. Spinal Tuberculosis: A Literature Review. JBJS Rev. 2019, 7, e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Dunn, R.N.; Ben Husien, M. Spinal tuberculosis: Review of current management. Bone Joint J. 2018, 100, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Khanna, K.; Sabharwal, S. Spinal tuberculosis: A comprehensive review for the modern spine surgeon. Spine J. 2019, 19, 1858–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Jain, A.K.; Kumar, J. Tuberculosis of spine: Neurological deficit. Eur. Spine J. 2013, 22, 624–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  141. Rajasekaran, S. Kyphotic deformity in spinal tuberculosis and its management. Int. Orthop. 2012, 36, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  142. Chatterjee, S.; Banta, A. The spectrum of tuberculosis of the spine in pediatric age group: A review. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2018, 34, 1937–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Al-Sayyad, M.J.; Abumunaser, L.A. Tuberculous arthritis revisited as a forgotten cause of monoarticular arthritis. Ann. Saudi Med. 2011, 31, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Abebe, W.; Abebe, B.; Molla, K.; Alemayehu, T. Tuberculous Dactylitis: An Uncommon Presentation of Skeletal Tuberculosis. Ethiop. J. Health Sci. 2016, 26, 301–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  145. McLellan, D.G.; Philips, K.B.; Corbett, C.E.; Bronze, M.S. Sternal osteomyelitis caused by mycobacterium tuberculosis: Case report and review of the literature. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2000, 319, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Saibaba, B.; Raj Gopinathan, N.; Santhanam, S.S.; Meena, U.K. Tubercular dactylitis in children. J. Pediatr. Orthop. B 2017, 26, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Saifudheen, K.; Anoop, T.M.; Mini, P.N.; Ramachandran, M.; Jabbar, P.K.; Jayaprakash, R. Primary tubercular osteomyelitis of the sternum. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 14, e164–e166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  148. Vohra, R.; Kang, H.S.; Dogra, S.; Saggar, R.R.; Sharma, R. Tuberculous osteomyelitis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1997, 79, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Jaovisidha, S.; Chen, C.; Ryu, K.N.; Siriwongpairat, P.; Pekanan, P.; Sartoris, D.J.; Resnick, D. Tuberculous tenosynovitis and bursitis: Imaging findings in 21 cases. Radiology 1996, 201, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Rashid, M.; Sarwar, S.U.; Haq, E.U.; Islam, M.Z.; Rizvi, T.A.; Ahmad, M.; Shah, K. Tuberculous tenosynovitis: A cause of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2006, 56, 116–118. [Google Scholar]
  151. Agarwal, R.P.; Mohan, N.; Garg, R.K.; Bajpai, S.K.; Verma, S.K.; Mohindra, Y. Clinicosocial aspect of osteo-articular tuberculosis. J. Indian Med. Assoc. 1990, 88, 307–309. [Google Scholar]
  152. Davidson, P.T.; Horowitz, I. Skeletal tuberculosis. A review with patient presentations and discussion. Am. J. Med. 1970, 48, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Alam, M.S.; Phan, K.; Karim, R.; Jonayed, S.A.; Munir, H.K.; Chakraborty, S.; Alam, T. Surgery for spinal tuberculosis: A multi-center experience of 582 cases. J. Spine Surg. 2015, 1, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  154. Darbyshire, J. Five-year assessment of controlled trials of short-course chemotherapy regimens of 6, 9 or 18 months’ duration for spinal tuberculosis in patients ambulatory from the start or undergoing radical surgery. Fourteenth report of the Medical Research Council Working Party on Tuberculosis of the Spine. Int. Orthop. 1999, 23, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  155. Kandwal, P.; Vijayaraghavan, G.; Jayaswal, A. Management of Tuberculous Infection of the Spine. Asian Spine J. 2016, 10, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Patel, R.; Gannamani, V.; Shay, E.; Alcid, D. Spinal Tuberculosis and Cold Abscess without Known Primary Disease: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2016, 2016, 1780153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Uzunkoy, A.; Harma, M.; Harma, M. Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis: Experience from 11 cases and review of the literature. World J. Gastroenterol. 2004, 10, 3647–3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Choi, E.H.; Coyle, W.J. Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Debi, U.; Ravisankar, V.; Prasad, K.K.; Sinha, S.K.; Sharma, A.K. Abdominal tuberculosis of the gastrointestinal tract: Revisited. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 14831–14840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Sanai, F.M.; Bzeizi, K.I. Systematic review: Tuberculous peritonitis—Presenting features, diagnostic strategies and treatment. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 22, 685–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Srivastava, U.; Almusa, O.; Tung, K.W.; Heller, M.T. Tuberculous peritonitis. Radiol. Case Rep. 2014, 9, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  162. Ladumor, H.; Al-Mohannadi, S.; Ameerudeen, F.S.; Ladumor, S.; Fadl, S. TB or not TB: A comprehensive review of imaging manifestations of abdominal tuberculosis and its mimics. Clin. Imaging 2021, 76, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Abu-Zidan, F.M.; Sheek-Hussein, M. Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis: Lessons learned over 30 years: Pectoral assay. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2019, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  164. Berzosa, M.; Tsukayama, D.T.; Davies, S.F.; Debol, S.M.; Cen, Y.Y.; Li, R.; Mallery, S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2010, 14, 578–584. [Google Scholar]
  165. Gupta, P.; Guleria, S.; Agarwal, S. Role of endoscopic ultrasound guided FNAC in diagnosis of pancreatic TB presenting as mass lesion: A case report and review of literature. Indian J. Tuberc. 2011, 58, 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  166. Krishnan, P.; Vayoth, S.O.; Dhar, P.; Surendran, S.; Ponnambathayil, S. Laparoscopy in suspected abdominal tuberculosis is useful as an early diagnostic method. ANZ J. Surg. 2008, 78, 987–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Mukewar, S.; Mukewar, S.; Ravi, R.; Prasad, A.; Dua, K.S. Colon tuberculosis: Endoscopic features and prospective endoscopic follow-up after anti-tuberculosis treatment. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2012, 3, e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Riquelme, A.; Calvo, M.; Salech, F.; Valderrama, S.; Pattillo, A.; Arellano, M.; Arrese, M.; Soza, A.; Viviani, P.; Letelier, L.M. Value of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in ascitic fluid for the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis: A meta-analysis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2006, 40, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Cheng, W.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Intestinal tuberculosis: Clinico-pathological profile and the importance of a high degree of suspicion. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2019, 24, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kamboj, S.; Goel, M.M.; Tandon, P.; Natu, S.M.; Nath, P. Correlative study of histopathology and bacteriology in patients of tubercular lymphadenitis. Indian J. Chest Dis. Allied Sci. 1994, 36, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  171. Martinez Tirado, P.; Lopez De Hierro Ruiz, M.; Martinez Garcia, R.; Martinez Cara, J.G.; Martin Rodriguez, M.M.; Castilla Castellano, M.M. Intestinal tuberculosis. A diagnostic challenge. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2003, 26, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Mehta, V.; Desai, D.; Abraham, P.; Rodrigues, C. Making a Positive Diagnosis of Intestinal Tuberculosis with the Aid of New Biologic and Histologic Features: How Far Have We Reached? Inflamm. Intest. Dis. 2019, 3, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Shi, X.C.; Zhang, L.F.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Liu, X.Q.; Fei, G.J. Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Intestinal Tuberculosis. Chin. Med. J. 2016, 129, 1330–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Mandal, A.; Das, S.K.; Bairagya, T.D. Presenting experience of managing abdominal tuberculosis at a tertiary care hospital in India. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2011, 3, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Weledji, E.P.; Pokam, B.T. Abdominal tuberculosis: Is there a role for surgery? World J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2017, 9, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Abbara, A.; Davidson, R.N. Etiology and management of genitourinary tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2011, 8, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Figueiredo, A.A.; Lucon, A.M.; Srougi, M. Urogenital Tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Jha, S.K.; Budh, D.P. Genitourinary Tuberculosis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  179. Matos, M.J.; Bacelar, M.T.; Pinto, P.; Ramos, I. Genitourinary tuberculosis. Eur. J. Radiol. 2005, 55, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  180. Sharma, J.B.; Sharma, E.; Sharma, S.; Dharmendra, S. Female genital tuberculosis: Revisited. Indian J. Med. Res. 2018, 148, S71–S83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Khan, F.R.; Cheema, F.A.; Khan, M.U. Accuracy of Urinary PCR as Compared with Urine Culture for Early Diagnosis of Genitourinary Tuberculosis. Pak. J. Med. Health Sci. 2013, 7, 675–678. [Google Scholar]
  182. Altez-Fernandez, C.; Ortiz, V.; Mirzazadeh, M.; Zegarra, L.; Seas, C.; Ugarte-Gil, C. Diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in urine for genitourinary tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Gupta, N.P.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, S. Reconstructive bladder surgery in genitourinary tuberculosis. Indian J. Urol. 2008, 24, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Kadhiravan, T.; Sharma, S.K. Medical management of genitourinary tuberculosis. Indian J. Urol. 2008, 24, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Wejse, C. Medical treatment for urogenital tuberculosis (UGTB). GMS Infect. Dis. 2018, 6, Doc04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Yadav, S.; Singh, P.; Hemal, A.; Kumar, R. Genital tuberculosis: Current status of diagnosis and management. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2017, 6, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  187. Zajaczkowski, T. Genitourinary tuberculosis: Historical and basic science review: Past and present. Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 2012, 65, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  188. Annamalai, R.; Biswas, J. Bilateral choroidal tuberculoma in miliary tuberculosis—Report of a case. J. Ophthalmic Inflamm. Infect. 2015, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  189. Barman, B.; Tiewsoh, I.; Lynrah, K.G.; Wankhar, B.; Beyong, T.; Issar, N.K. Miliary tuberculosis with pulmonary and extrapulmonary component complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2017, 6, 688–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Rietbroek, R.C.; Dahlmans, R.P.; Smedts, F.; Frantzen, P.J.; Koopman, R.J.; van der Meer, J.W. Tuberculosis cutis miliaris disseminata as a manifestation of miliary tuberculosis: Literature review and report of a case of recurrent skin lesions. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1991, 13, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  191. Savic, I.; Trifunovic-Skodric, V.; Mitrovic, D. Clinically unrecognized miliary tuberculosis: An autopsy study. Ann. Saudi Med. 2016, 36, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  192. Sharma, S.K.; Mohan, A. Miliary Tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Sharma, S.K.; Mohan, A.; Sharma, A. Miliary tuberculosis: A new look at an old foe. J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobact. Dis. 2016, 3, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  194. Toptas, T.; Ilhan, B.; Bilgin, H.; Dincses, E.; Ozdogan, O.; Kaygusuz-Atagunduz, I.; Odabasi, Z.; Korten, V.; Firatli-Tuglular, T. Miliary Tuberculosis Induced Acute Liver Failure. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2015, 2015, 759341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  195. Van den Bos, F.; Terken, M.; Ypma, L.; Kimpen, J.L.; Nel, E.D.; Schaaf, H.S.; Schoeman, J.F.; Donald, P.R. Tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis in young children. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2004, 9, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  196. Dunphy, L.; Keating, E.; Parke, T. Miliary tuberculosis in an immunocompetent male with a fatal outcome. BMJ Case Rep. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Escobedo-Jaimes, L.; Cicero-Sabido, R.; Criales-Cortez, J.L.; Ramirez, E.; Romero, M.; Rivero, V.; Islas, F.; Olivera, H.; Gonzalez, S.; Escobar-Gutierrez, A. Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis in bone marrow smear. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2003, 7, 580–586. [Google Scholar]
  198. Hong, S.H.; Im, J.G.; Lee, J.S.; Song, J.W.; Lee, H.J.; Yeon, K.M. High resolution CT findings of miliary tuberculosis. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1998, 22, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Khan, F.Y. Review of literature on disseminated tuberculosis with emphasis on the focused diagnostic workup. J. Fam. Commun. Med. 2019, 26, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ko, Y.; Lee, H.Y.; Lee, Y.S.; Song, J.; Kim, M.Y.; Lee, H.K.; Shin, J.H.; Choi, S.J.; Lee, Y.M. Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Presenting as Miliary Tuberculosis without Immune Suppression: A Case Diagnosed Rapidly with the Genotypic Line Probe Assay Method. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 2014, 76, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Kwong, J.S.; Carignan, S.; Kang, E.Y.; Muller, N.L.; FitzGerald, J.M. Miliary tuberculosis. Diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography. Chest 1996, 110, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  202. Mert, A.; Arslan, F.; Kuyucu, T.; Koc, E.N.; Ylmaz, M.; Turan, D.; Altn, S.; Pehlivanoglu, F.; Sengoz, G.; Yldz, D.; et al. Miliary tuberculosis: Epidemiologicaland clinical analysis of large-case series from moderate to low tuberculosis endemic Country. Medicine 2017, 96, e5875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Saukkonen, J.J.; Cohn, D.L.; Jasmer, R.M.; Schenker, S.; Jereb, J.A.; Nolan, C.M.; Peloquin, C.A.; Gordin, F.M.; Nunes, D.; Strader, D.B.; et al. An official ATS statement: Hepatotoxicity of antituberculosis therapy. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 935–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Sonika, U.; Kar, P. Tuberculosis and liver disease: Management issues. Trop. Gastroenterol. 2012, 33, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Abadir, A.P.; Han, J.Y.; Youssef, F.A. Intestinal Tuberculosis Masquerading as Crohn’s Disease? A Case of Disseminated Tuberculosis after Anti-TNF Therapy for Suspected Crohn’s Disease. Case Rep. Gastrointest. Med. 2019, 2019, 6053503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Boonsarngsuk, V.; Mangkang, K.; Santanirand, P. Prevalence and risk factors of drug-resistant extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Clin. Respir. J. 2018, 12, 2101–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Diriba, G.; Kebede, A.; Tola, H.H.; Yenew, B.; Moga, S.; Addise, D.; Alemu, A.; Mohammed, Z.; Getahun, M.; Fantahun, M.; et al. Molecular characterization and drug resistance patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Mok, J.; Kang, B.H.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, T.; Lee, H.K.; Cho, Y.J.; Jeon, D. Drug resistance in extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in South Korea: Comparison with pulmonary tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2019, 23, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Raveendran, R.; Oberoi, J.K.; Wattal, C. Multidrug-resistant pulmonary & extrapulmonary tuberculosis: A 13 years retrospective hospital-based analysis. Indian J. Med. Res. 2015, 142, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Tahseen, S.; Khanzada, F.M.; Baloch, A.Q.; Abbas, Q.; Bhutto, M.M.; Alizai, A.W.; Zaman, S.; Qasim, Z.; Durrani, M.N.; Farough, M.K.; et al. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Pakistan—A nation-wide multicenter retrospective study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Lohiya, S.; Tripathy, J.P.; Sagili, K.; Khanna, V.; Kumar, R.; Ojha, A.; Bhatnagar, A.; Khanna, A. Does Drug-Resistant Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Hinder TB Elimination Plans? A Case from Delhi, India. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 5, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Desai, U.; Joshi, J.M. Extrapulmonary drug-resistant tuberculosis at a drug-resistant tuberculosis center, Mumbai: Our experience—Hope in the midst of despair! Lung India 2019, 36, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Dusthackeer, A.; Sekar, G.; Chidambaram, S.; Kumar, V.; Mehta, P.; Swaminathan, S. Drug resistance among extrapulmonary TB patients: Six years experience from a supranational reference laboratory. Indian J. Med. Res. 2015, 142, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Pang, Y.; An, J.; Shu, W.; Huo, F.; Chu, N.; Gao, M.; Qin, S.; Huang, H.; Chen, X.; Xu, S. Epidemiology of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis among Inpatients, China, 2008–2017. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Hoel, I.M.; Syre, H.; Skarstein, I.; Mustafa, T. Xpert MTB/RIF ultra for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a high-income low-tuberculosis prevalence setting. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Zhang, M.; Xue, M.; He, J.Q. Diagnostic accuracy of the new Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculosis disease: A preliminary systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 90, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Kohli, M.; Schiller, I.; Dendukuri, N.; Yao, M.; Dheda, K.; Denkinger, C.M.; Schumacher, S.G.; Steingart, K.R. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF assays for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 1, CD012768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Park, M.; Kon, O.M. Use of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra in extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2021, 19, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. WHO. Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary TB in Adults and Children. Available online:;jsessionid=2848686F97E0888564C0B236B708AAA9?sequence=1 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  220. Lee, H.Y.; Lee, J.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, M.Y.; Lee, H.K.; Lee, Y.M.; Shin, J.H.; Ko, Y. Drug-resistance pattern of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis during 2006 to 2013 in a Korean tertiary medical center. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2015, 30, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Mase, S.; Chorba, T.; Parks, S.; Belanger, A.; Dworkin, F.; Seaworth, B.; Warkentin, J.; Barry, P.; Shah, N. Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 1010–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  222. Singh, R.; Dwivedi, S.P.; Gaharwar, U.S.; Meena, R.; Rajamani, P.; Prasad, T. Recent updates on drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 1547–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
Figure 1. Flowchart showing panel of diagnostic tests for EPTB due to M. tuberculosis complex organisms. * Histopathology is performed based on the availability of samples and facility in the diagnostic lab. Abbreviations: EP, extrapulmonary; CXR, chest X-ray; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; AFB, acid-fast bacilli; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification; LiPA, line probe assay; ADA, adenosine deaminase; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma.
Figure 1. Flowchart showing panel of diagnostic tests for EPTB due to M. tuberculosis complex organisms. * Histopathology is performed based on the availability of samples and facility in the diagnostic lab. Abbreviations: EP, extrapulmonary; CXR, chest X-ray; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; AFB, acid-fast bacilli; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification; LiPA, line probe assay; ADA, adenosine deaminase; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma.
Jor 01 00015 g001
Table 1. Summary of EPTB disease, organs affected, clinical presentation, age of onset, and recommendations for adjuvant therapy or surgery.
Table 1. Summary of EPTB disease, organs affected, clinical presentation, age of onset, and recommendations for adjuvant therapy or surgery.
DiseaseOrgan AffectedClinical PresentationAge of OnsetRecommendations for Adjuvant TherapyRecommendations for Surgery
MeningitisBrainInitial—headache, low-grade fever, malaise, vomiting, and confusion
Severe—seizures, coma, and stupor
Children ≤5 years of agePrednisone or dexamethasone-intravenous and continued as an oral treatmentNone
Cervical LymphadenitisNeck-Lymph nodesUnilateral single or multiple painless lumps; fever, night sweats, and weight loss Adults of age 20 to 40 yearsNoneIncision and drainage
OcularEyePrimary—eyelid, conjunctival, corneal, and scleral lesions
Secondary—inflammation of the uveal tract, retina, and optic nerve
None in particularOral prednisone or topical steroids or prednisone dropsNone
OralMouth, tonguePrimary—painless ulcer, single and associated with lymph node enlargement
Secondary—single, irregular, superficial, or deep painful ulcer, odynophagia
Primary—children and young adults Secondary—adultsTopical anti-inflammatory drugs or mucosa protecting agentsNone
PleuralPleura covering the lungsFever, chest pain, cough, dyspnoea sometimes associated with weight loss, loss of appetite, and malaiseAdolescents and adultsNoneThoracentesis
PericarditisPericardium covering the heartPericarditis presents as fever, weight loss, night sweats, cough, chest pain, and breathlessness, along with moderate to high pericardial effusionAdultsUse of corticosteroidsEchocardiographic or fluoroscopic-guided needle pericardiocentesis
CutaneousSkinUsually presents as a reddish or purple papule or nodule accompanied by painful ulcers on the skin; occasional draining sinus tracts or cutaneous abscesses seen
No fever, weight loss, or night sweats
TB cutis miliaris disseminate occurs in infants and children with less immunity;NoneSurgical excision and debridement
MusculoskeletalMuscle and Bone *Pain and swelling of the spine, hip, knee, shoulder, ankle, elbow, femur, humerus, hand, feet, or wrist; occasional fever, weight loss, and night sweatsPrimary—children Secondary—eldersNoneSurgery when neurological deficit, cord compression, spinal instability, or kyphosis to variable extent particular children; for cold abscesses and sinus tract involvement, debridement and/or drainage is conducted
Abdominal GI tract, Peritoneum, Solid viscera Symptoms are abdominal pain, fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea Specific organs show perforations, obliterations, ulceration, hypertrophy, ulcerohypertrophy, fistulae, and stricturesAdultsNoneSurgery when irreversible constrictions, strictures, abscesses, and fistula formation cause organ damage
GenitourinaryKidneys, male or female genital tractUrinary tract involvement with fever, weight loss, and sweating are observed along with urologic symptoms such as flank pain, pyuria, hematuria, and even urinary incontinence
Male genital tract infection shows tender scrotal swelling, irregular/nodular prostate, genital ulcer, and perineal sinus or fistula and may lead to male infertility; female genital tract shows menstrual irregularity, abdominal pain, pelvic inflammatory disease and even infertility
AdultsNoneAblative surgery; reconstructive surgery; percutaneous drainage
MiliaryDifferent parts of the bodyThe symptoms are fever, malaise, anorexia, weight loss, cough with chills, and rigours when septicaemia is involved
Specific symptoms are observed depending on the organ involved and usually show cutaneous lesions (Tuberculosis cutis miliaris disseminate), choroidal tubercles, and commonly TB meningitis; atypical manifestations are also seen
Infants and children as well as elders with comorbidities; predominantly malesPrednisone when meningitis, pleuritis, or pericarditis is involvedSurgery when organ damage is irreversible
Note: All EPTB conditions listed in the table can occur as primary (rare) or secondary (common) infections, with some showing differential clinical presentation.
Table 2. Sensitivity and specificity of various diagnostic tests commonly used for EPTB.
Table 2. Sensitivity and specificity of various diagnostic tests commonly used for EPTB.
Type of EP-TBSampleDiagnostic TestSensitivitySpecificityReferences
MeningitisCSFCSF ADA86–89%78–91%[11,12]
Multiplex PCR71.489.6[18]
Xpert MTB/RIF 7097[20]
Xpert Ultra 8788[20]
LymphadenitisLymph node aspirateADANANA
Xpert MTB/RIF 8986[20]
Xpert Ultra 70100[20]
Pleural TBPleural fluidPleural ADA88.3788[27]
Pleural IFN-γ86.6190.2[28]
Multiplex PCR95.34 [30]
Xpert MTB/RIF 5099[20]
Xpert Ultra 7171[20]
TB PericarditisPericardial fluidPericardial ADA87–9389–97[31]
Pericardial IFN-γ87–9591–97[32]
Xpert MTB/RIF 6088[20]
Xpert Ultra NANA
CutaneousSkin biopsyTST33–96%62.50%[35]
Xpert Ultra NANA
MusculoskeletalSynovial fluidSynovial ADA83.396.7[38]
PCR 82.6591[40]
Xpert MTB/RIF 9794[20]
Xpert Ultra 9697[20]
AbdominalPeritoneal fluidADA10097[31]
T-cell IFNγ9078[41]
PCR 35–65100[42]
Multiplex PCR75.7100[42]
Xpert MTB/RIF 5997[20]
Xpert Ultra NANA
Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; PCR, polymerase chain re-action; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification; ADA, adenosine deaminase; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma; FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytology; NA, not available; MTB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; RIF, rifampin; TST, tuberculin skin test.
Table 3. Summary of the WHO guidelines for drug-sensitive and DR EPTB treatment $.
Table 3. Summary of the WHO guidelines for drug-sensitive and DR EPTB treatment $.
Resistance Regimen DurationChoice of DrugsPrimary RecommendationsConditional Recommendations
NoneStandard chemotherapy regimen6 monthsIntensive phase—2 months of rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide Continuation phase—4 months of rifampicin and isoniazidContinuation phase extended up to 7 months of rifampicin and isoniazid for EPTB
Isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis (Hr-TB)Mono-INH regimen6 months Rifampicin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, and levofloxacin is recommended for 6 monthsTreatment period extended up to 9–12 months for EPTB

No inclusion of streptomycin or other injectable agents

Drug susceptibility to fluoroquinolone by genotypic or phenotypic DST needs to be established
MDR/RR-TBLonger MDR regimenTotal of 18–20 months with 15–17 months after culture conversionCombination of group A, B, C drugs to add to four drugs; if bedaquiline or linezolid is added, drug combination to retain three drugs throughout treatmentTotal of 18–20 months for EPTB when culture-negative or conversion cannot be tested; injectables used for 6–7 months
Inclusion of
levofloxacin A or moxifloxacin A*;
Bedaquiline A# for patients aged 18 years or more;
Linezolid A. No inclusion of kanamycin, capreomycin and clavulanic acid
The following drugs may be included:
Bedaquiline A# may also be included in patients aged 6–17 years;
Clofazimine B# and cycloserine; B*/terizidone B*
Ethambutol C#;
Delamanid C# for patients aged 3 years or more;
Pyrazinamide C;
Imipenem-cilastatin C or meropenem C*;
Amikacin C# or streptomycin C#;
The following drugs may be included when bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, or delamanid are not used:
Ethionamide C* or prothionamide C*;
p-aminosalicylic acid C#.
MDR/RR-TBShorter all oral MDR regimen9–12 monthsFor fluoroquinolone sensitive cases:

2 months of Linezolid–Bedaquiline–Levofloxacin–Clofazimine–Pyrazinamide,
4 months of Bedaquiline–Levofloxacin–Clofazimine–Pyrazinamide
3 months of Levofloxacin–Clofazimine–Pyrazinamide
For EPTB cases with meningitis and disseminated disease, a shorter regimen should be avoided

Susceptibility to fluoroquinolones needs to be established by genotypic or phenotypic DST
6 monthsFor fluoroquinolone resistant cases:

6 months of Bedaquiline–Pretomanid–Linezolid (BPaL regimen)
$ Therapy for EPTB recommended by the WHO guidelines for drug-susceptible and resistant TB [43,44,45,46]. Chemotherapy for EPTB is similar to PTB, but the duration for EPTB should be determined by clinical or radiologic responses, mainly when culture-negative or periodic culture conversion monitoring cannot be done. For more extended MDR/RR-TB regimen, groups A (levofloxacin/moxifloxacin, bedaquiline, linezolid), B (clofazimine, cycloserine/terizidone), or C (ethambutol, delamanid, pyrazinamide, imipenem–cilastatin, meropenem, amikacin (streptomycin), ethionamide/prothionamide, p-aminosalicylic acid) drugs are used, and individual drugs are indicated in the table with a superscript A, B, or C. Abbreviations: Hr-TB, isoniazid (INH) resistant TB; MDR, multidrug-resistant; RR-TB, rifampicin-resistant TB; DST, drug sensitivity test. Notes: (1) A shorter MDR regimen is not recommended when TB meningitis or disseminated disease or HIV co-infection is indicated. (2) For meningitis, * indicates the preferred choice of the drug due to penetration of the brain, and # indicates drugs not preferred owing to no penetration or no availability of data.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to TopTop