Next Article in Journal
Improving Management of Spatial Data through Spatial Database
Previous Article in Journal
Refining IKONOS DEM for Dehradun Region Using Photogrammetry Based DEM Editing Methods, Orthoimage Generation and Quality Assessment of Cartosat-1 DEM
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Geochemical Risks of Diamond Mining in Siberia †

1
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 677980 Yakutsk, Russia
2
D.D. Savvinov Research Institute of Applied Ecology of the North, M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, 677980 Yakutsk, Russia
3
Faculty of Geology and Survey, M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, 677013 Yakutsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Geosciences, 7–13 December 2020; Available online: https://iecg2020.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 5(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2020-08907
Published: 7 December 2020

Abstract

:
Geochemical risk is caused by the release of hazardous chemicals to the earth surface. Primary diamond deposits are located in difficult mining and geological conditions. They represent natural geochemical anomalies associated with the mineral composition of rocks and groundwater, which contain a number of impurity elements with high toxic properties (Tl, Di, As, Cd, Hg), and increased concentrations of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Pb, Ti, V and others). The paper presents the physical-geographical and mining-geological conditions of the diamondiferous region, where three large mining and processing divisions operate: Udachninsky, Aikhalsky and Nyurbinsky. pH, organic matter (humus), total nitrogen, and physical clay were identified in the study samples, by using potentiometric, photoelectric colorimetric, spectrophotometric methods, and pipette method for particle size analysis. Gross and mobile forms of trace elements were determined by atomic absorption and emission spectrometry. The groups of elements were identified that determined the natural and man-made anomalies. The accumulation of Cr, Ni, and Co determines the influence of kimberlite magmatism in general. Cu, Sr, and Li are accumulated in the soils of the Daldyn-Alakit diamond-bearing region. Increased concentrations of Mn and Cu are typical in the soils of the Sredne-Markhinsky diamond-bearing region. An assessment of the ecological and geochemical state of the study areas was carried out according to the indicator of total pollution (Zc), which is the sum of the excess of the concentration coefficients of chemical elements accumulating in anomalies. Areas of pollution and zones of the greatest risk are localized, which occupy up to 75% of the total area of industrial sites. They confined to quarry-dump complexes and to areas of impact of tailing dumps of processing plants.

1. Introduction

Mining activities significantly impact the environment and often determine anxiety in the local population. Diamond mining in Siberia is the most ambitious and impressive, since the primary diamond deposits are associated with vertical pipe-like kimberlite geological bodies that go to a depth of many kilometers. Therefore, their development leads to the formation of deep cone-shaped open pits. For example, at the Udachny quarry, open-pit mining was completed at a depth of 640 m, and the size of the quarry on the surface is 2000 × 1600 m. To date, mining is carried out using the mine method, and diamond reserves have been explored to a depth of 1400 m [1,2].
The development of diamond-bearing areas involves geological prospecting of various level of details, where drilling, geophysical, and mining operations are used, and a network of openings (in a forest) is cut. In addition, the operation of the largest diamond-bearing pipes is complicated by the arrival of brines from subpermafrost high-pressure water-bearing horizons; their safe disposal in underground storage is a cornerstone of ensuring a favorable environmental situation [3]. Rock elevated from the depths accumulate in the overburden rock dumps with a height of approximately 100 m, and enrichment products are stored in extensive tailing dumps. Thus, significant amounts of chemical elements and their compounds rise from the earth’s interior to the day surface, which forms technogenic geochemical anomalies in soils, bottom sediments, and surface waters. Composition and contrast of technogenic geochemical anomalies represent technogenic geochemical risks for the state of landscape components and its biotic component.
The number of papers devoted to various aspects of ecological and geochemical studies or ecological and geochemical assessment of the consequences of mining activities is extremely large [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Various relevant methodological recommendations and suggestions for improving the methodology and technology of ecological and geochemical study of industrial and urban areas have been developed. This paper examines the geochemical risks on the territories of the Udachninsky, Aikhalsky, and Nyurbinsky mining and processing plants (MPP), which are located in the basin of the Markha river-the left tributary of the Vilyui river, which flows into the great Siberian Lena river. About 60% of ALROSA’s diamonds are extracted here.

2. Overview of the Study Area

The studied area is located in Western Yakutia (Eastern Siberia of Russia). The Udachninsky and Aikhalsky (MPP) are located within the Daldyn-Alakit diamond-bearing area, and Nyurbinsky (MPP) in the Sredne-Markhinsky diamond-bearing area (Figure 1).
In regional tectonic terms, the territories are located in the junction zone of anticline and syncline of the Siberian platform complicated by a fault system, kimberlite and trap magmatism. The kimberlite fields are localized at the intersections of fracture zones with the aulacogens, which represent an ancient rift. In the geological structure, the Archean crystalline basement is covered with a sedimentary cover from 2.4–4 km in the area of the middle Markha. The sedimentary cover is made up of the Vend—lower Paleozoic, middle Paleozoic and Mesozoic layers of geology, represented by limestones, dolomites, and their clay and marly differences (Figure 2).
The climate of the territory is sharply continental and belongs to the subarctic zone of the Siberian region in the north. Winter is severe and long with minimum temperatures below −50 °C and a short summer; the average annual air temperature in the area of Udachny is −11.8 °C. The entire basin of the Markha river is located in the zone of permafrost rock mass, the depth of its bottom varies in the study areas from 350 m (in the south) to 1050 m (in the north). The seasonal thawing layer varies from 0.2–3 m. The following occurrences of cryogenic processes and phenomena are observed on the territory: solifluction, thermokarst, frost heaving, frost cracking, thermal erosion, and frost weathering [14]. In the areas of deposits, there are all types of underground water typical for the cryolithozone: supra-, intra-and subpermafrost water. The supra permafrost water is represented by the fresh waters of the seasonally thawed layer, waters of the underflow, and sub-lacustrine taliks (ice-free zones within permafrost region). The Upper Cambrian, Middle Cambrian, and Lower Cambrian aquifer systems are distinguished in the sedimentary cover. Underground waters are brines with mineralization from 350–410 g/L. The most difficult hydrogeological conditions are typical for the Udachnaya kimberlite pipe. The brines contain high concentrations of trace components: Br, Li, Rb, Cs, and Sr. The leading position is occupied by Sr, in which content varies from 438.1–894.2 mg/dm3. The Li content varies from 67.4–165.9 mg/dm3, and Rb, respectively, from 4.89–18.9 mg/dm3. Cs concentrations in brines are not more than 0.01 mg/dm3. Brines belong to mineral bromine water type. Brines are highly aggressive, due to their high mineralization, ion composition, and low pH values. According to the aggressive effect on metals, calcium chloride is at the first place. The miming of deep horizons of the diamond deposit is related to the arrival of a large number of aggressive and environmentally dangerous calcium chloride brines—thousands and the first millions of cubic meters that require their subsequent disposal back into the subsurface [15].
The landscapes of the territories are represented by north taiga open subshrub-moss-lichen larch forests in the zone of continuous distribution of permafrost rocks. The soil cover is dominated by different subtypes of cryozems (O-CR-Cg), lithozems (AO-C), carbolitozems (H-(C)–MCA), and gleezems (AO–GC).

3. Experiments

3.1. Material Survey and Sampling

The original exclusive materials of the field geo-ecological surveys performed earlier at the previous stages of research (1994–2019) were used as sources of initial information. The project materials of the state environmental expertise of large engineering projects on the territory of the West Yakutian diamond-bearing province were also involved. A large amount of information provides a sufficient degree of representativeness and updating of the obtained results.
Sampling was carried out at the sites of mining and processing plants, where a network of observations was established with a sampling step of 2 × 2 km on a scale of 1:100,000 km. Sampling frequency in summer every 3–4 years from the near-surface layer to a depth of 0–20 cm. In parallel, soil sections were made in different biotopes with the horizon-oriented sampling for the entire depth of defrosting, to characterize the soil cover. In total, in 2004–2019, 63 soil sections were made on the territory of two diamond-bearing regions and 3120 soil and subsoil samples were taken.

3.2. Data Analysis and Processing

The pH, Organic Matter (Humus), Total Nitrogen (TN), and Physical Clay (PC) were determined using pH meter method (Mettler Toledo, SevenCompact Advanced), photoelectric colorimetric method (KFK-2 UHL 4.2), spectrophotometric method (PE-5300VI), and pipette method for particle size analysis (Kachinsky method), respectively.
Heavy metal contents was determined in mobile forms by atomic absorption spectrometry on multichannel gas analyzer (MGA-915 GC Lumex). For complex characterization of forms of heavy metals, 1 N HNO3 was used, which, in contrast to H2O and 1 N HCl, extracts acid-soluble elements that are more firmly bound with the soil. Total gross trace elements were determined using emission spectrum analysis at diffraction spectrograph DFS-8.
The ecological and geochemical characterization of soil pollution was carried out according to geochemical indicators, which take into account the distribution of both individual metals involved in the pollution and their associations due to the polyelement nature of the chemical composition of technogenic flows that form the pollution. The concentration factor (Kc) of chemical elements and the total pollution indicator (Zc) are these indicators. The calculation formulas are:
K c   = C i C f  
where Ci is the actual content of the pollutant in the soil, mg/kg; Cf is the background content of the pollutant in the soil, mg/kg;
Z c   = i = 1 n K c n 1
where Kc is the concentration factor of the i-th component of pollution with values Kc > 1.5; n is the number of anomalous elements. Items with very low background content are not included in the count.
The gradations of the degree of soil cover contamination are: Zc < 16—permissible; 16 to 32—moderately hazardous; 32 to 128—hazardous; and ≥128—extremely hazardous [16].
The obtained quantitative data were processed using software Microsoft Excel 2016, OriginPro 8.5.1, ArcGIS 9.0. Correlation analysis was performed using Statistica 6.0.

4. Results

Significant excesses over the background concentrations of gross and mobile forms of trace-and macroelements in soils are observed throughout the territory in the zone of impact of quarry-dump complexes of the studied diamond-bearing areas. Their sources are local impact effects that differ in level and geochemical spectrum from regional inhomogeneities. In this sense, physical and chemical properties of soils are criteria for assessing the environmental and sanitary-toxicological state of soils. Variations of integral indicators for assessing the state of the soil cover (Kc and Zc) are criteria that characterize the degree of evolution of geochemical risks at a particular site. Analysis of geochemical risks allows you to determine the level of accumulated geoecological damage and assess the level of pollution. In turn, it also helps to develop recommendations for reducing environmental risks and plan activities aimed at eliminating the negative consequences of productive activities.
Table 1 shows an integrated assessment of the geochemical conditions of the Daldyn-Alakit and Sredne-Markhinsky diamond-bearing areas.

5. Discussion

The impact of geochemical factors on the near-surface parts of the lithosphere creates prerequisites for the formation of environmental risks within certain areas and territories [17]. On the territory of the studied diamond-bearing areas, quarry-dump complexes have been formed, which include ground-based technogenic storage of mining products (waste rock dumps) and enrichment products (tailing dumps). The impact of quarry-dump complexes is manifested by the formation of areal technogenic geochemical anomalies in the soil cover. Therefore, directly on the territory of the industrial site, along with natural types of soils—cryosemes, soils that are in the immediate zone of impact of man-made objects are formed, with identified surface contamination, as well as man-made surface formations (MMSO) in the form of soil dumps and tailing dumps.
Geochemical risks for the Daldyn-Alakit diamond-bearing region appear as an accumulation of a wide range of trace elements, such as Cr, Co, Ni, Mn, Li, Be, and Sn on the day surface during mining operations. Biogenic accumulation of Ni, Mn, and Cd in the upper layer of the soil and Cr, Ni, Co, Mn, and Cu in the suprapermafrost soil horizon are typical for the soils of the studied area—cryozems.
Geochemical risks for the Daldyn-Alakit diamond-bearing region are the spatial variation of the trace element composition of soils, bottom sediments and water, which appear in increased concentrations of Cr, Ni, Co, Ti, Si, Y, Nb, Li, Be, and Sr. At the same time, Sr and Li are markers of the impact of highly mineralized groundwater.
Most of the trace elements are in an inert bound state, due to aerotechnogenic dispersion and accumulate in the upper organic-mineral horizons of soils. If the integrity of the soil profile is preserved, the accumulation only of trace elements occurs, which is a potential threat in the environmental aspect. Changes in soil and geochemical conditions (chemical pollution, water flood, water logging, development of salinization processes), mechanical violation of the integrity of the soil profile, etc. will lead to a gradual and possible mass transition of trace elements into mobile forms.
The ecological and geochemical situation of the territory of Udachninsky MPP is characterized mainly by an acceptable and moderately dangerous category of pollution, and Aikhalsky MPP and Nyurbinsky MPP by a moderately dangerous one (Figure 3).
At the same time, local areas with a dangerous category of pollution are observed at industrial sites of the Daldyn-Alakit diamond-bearing region. The territory of the Sredne-Markhinsky diamond-bearing region is characterized by a higher level of pollution with the category—extremely dangerous. Thus, these studies allowed us to identify and localize areas of technogenic anomalies that characterize the active accumulation of gross and mobile forms of trace elements.

6. Conclusions

The combination of mining-geological and physical-geographical conditions with various aspects of the development of diamond resources determines the spectrum and nature of the distribution of chemicals in the natural environment and their danger to ecosystems. When the soil and vegetation layer is disturbed, gravitational movement of soil and subsoil material along the slopes occurs with cryogenic solifluctional spreading of clay masses, mixing of their composition, and activation of geochemical processes. Rocks on the surface are subject to cryogenic weathering. In addition, violation of the soil cover or its destruction are a catalyst for geochemical processes of migration of matter, and within the boundaries of anthropogenic landscapes they cause the formation of technogenic geochemical anomalies. Within the latter, the processes of water migration are most intensively expressed, leading to the accumulation or dispersion of the most mobile trace elements, removal of biogenic elements, salinization, leaching of soils, and a sharp violation of the natural balance. The presence of geochemical risk objects on the territory of the studied diamond mining areas led to an average threefold increase in the area of the sites characterized by an extremely dangerous category of soil contamination compared to the state of 2014.
On the territory of the Sredne-Markhinsky diamond-bearing region, the area of highly dangerous pollution increased by 120 km2; three areal and two-point high-contrast anomalies were recorded with an extremely dangerous level of soil contamination, with a total conditional area of about 51.6 km2. The increasing trend has a north-west and south-east direction. On the territory of the Daldyn–Alakit diamond-bearing region, a dangerous ecological situation is recorded on 75% of the entire area.
Changes in the chemical composition of soils and waters, in turn, are reflected in the biogeochemical parameters of the ecosystems of the region as a whole, increasing the concentration of chemical elements, primarily in edificator plants.
Studies of ecological-geochemical state of Daldyno-Alakit and Sredne-Markhinsky diamond-bearing areas allowed us to localize the area of soil pollution of the Udachninskiy, Aihalsky, and Nyurbinsky mining and processing plants that represent a potential threat to the ecosystem as a whole.

Author Contributions

Y.L. and V.P. conceived and designed the experiments; A.G. performed the experiments; Y.L., V.P. and A.G. analyzed the data; Y.L., A.G. and V.P. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

For further information, please contact the corresponding author ([email protected]).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of education of the Russian Federation (projects FUEM-2019-0003 “Evolution of the earth’s crust of the North Asian craton, basite-ultra-basite and kimberlite magmatism, diamond-bearing content of the Yakutian kimberlite province”, and FSRG-2020-0018 “Study of the functioning of the Arctic and Subarctic ecosystems of Yakutia in the conditions of increasing anthropogenic impact and global climate change”).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Drozdov, A.V. Assessment of the possibility of pumping drainage brines from quarry and mine «Udachnaya» to the Middle Cambrian aquifer. Bull. Irkutsk State Tech. Univ. 2013, 7, 32–40. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Atroschenko, F.G. Assessment of hydrogeologic conditions of subsyrface development of the “Udachnaya” pipe. GeoecologyHydrogeol. Geocryol. 2012, 5, 414–421. [Google Scholar]
  3. Legostaeva, Y.B.; Ksenofontova, M.I.; Popov, V.F. Geoecologic situation at site of drainage brine utilization during development of primary deposits in Yakutia pipe. Eurasian Min. 2019, 1, 43–48. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boularbah, A.; Schwartz, C.; Bitton, G.; Aboudrar, W.; Ouhammou, A.; Morel, J.L. Heavy metal contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 2. Assessment of metal accumulation and toxicity in plants. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Krupskaya, L.T.; Grekhnev, N.I.; Novorotskaya, A.G.; Utkina, E.V.; Krupsky, A.V.; Rastanin, N.K. Migration of toxic chemical elements in the components of the natural environment in the zone of influence of the tailing dump of the Central Processing Plant of JSC Solnechny GOK. Min. Inf. Anal. Bull. 2010, S4, 349–361. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Yezhov, A.Y. Technogenic pollution of landscapes of the north-west of the Kola Peninsula by heavy metals. Vestnik MGOU. Ser. Nat. Sci. 2010, 1, 98–103. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  7. Koptsik, S.; Koptsik, G.; Livantsova, S.; Eruslankina, L.; Zhmelkova, T.; Vologdina, Z. Heavy metals in soils near the nickel smelter: Chemistry, spatial variation, and impacts on plant diversity. J. Environ. Monit. 2003, 5, 441–450. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Loska, K.; Wiechula, D.; Korus, I. Metal contamination of farming soils affected by industry. Env. Int. 2004, 30, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gololobova, A.G.; Legostaeva, Y.B. Heavy metals in cryozems of western yakutia. In Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems: Conference Proceedings SGEM 2019, 30 June–6 July 2019; STEF92 Technology Ltd.: Bulgaria, Sofia, 2019; Volume 19, pp. 239–246, Book 3.2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sorokina, O.A.; Kiselev, V.I. Soil contamination in the development zone of the dzhalindinsky placer and ore gold deposits in the amur region. Ecol. Ind. Russ. 2005, 7, 24–28. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Sun, Z.H.; Xie, X.D.; Wang, P.; Hu, Y.N.; Cheng, H.F. Heavy metal pollution caused by small-scale metal ore mining activities: A case study from a polymetallic mine in South China. Sci. Total Env. 2018, 639, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Freytag, K.; Pulz, K. The new federal nature conservation act from the perspective of mining projects. World Min.-Surf. Undergr. 2010, 62, 214–221. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nikolaev, M.V.; Danilov, Y.G.; Kurneva, M.V. Problems and prospects of modern development of diamond mining industry. Eurasian Min. 2014, 1, 45–48. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Semenova, Y.M.; Belova, A.V. Geography of Siberia at the Beginning of the XXI Century: In 6 Volumes; Publisher: Academic publishing house “Geo”, Novosibirsk, Russia, 2015; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shepelev, V.V.; Tolstikhin, O.N.; Piguzova, V.M. Permafrost-Hydrogeological Conditions of Eastern Siberia; Publisher: Nauka, Novosibirsk, Russia, 1984; 192p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Saet, E.; Revich, B.A.; Yanin, E.P. Geochemistry of the Environment; Publisher: Nedra, Moscow, Russia, 1990. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Rybakov, D.S.; Krutskikh, N.V.; Shelekhova, T.S.; Lavrova, N.B.; Slukovskiy, Z.I.; Krichevtsova, M.V.; Lazareva, O.V. Climatic and Geochemical Aspects of the Formation of Environmental Risks in the Republic of Karelia; Publisher: LLC “ElekSis”, Sankt-Petersburg, Russia, 2013; 130p. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The layout of the territory, Scale 1:100,000.
Figure 1. The layout of the territory, Scale 1:100,000.
Environsciproc 05 00004 g001
Figure 2. Geological map of Daldyn-Alakit (a) and Sredne-Markhinsky (b) diamond-bearing areas. Q—Quaternary system, undivided sediments—lluvial sands, pebbles, lacustrine-bog silts, peat; J—Jurassic system, undivided sediments—sandstones, siltstones, mudstones, conglomerates, coal lenses; T—Triassic system, undivided sediments—sandstones, siltstones, mudstones, conglomerates, limestones; P—Permian system, undivided sediments—sandstones, mudstones, shales, conglomerates, coals; O1—Ordovician system, lower section—dolomites, limestones, calcareous sandstones; Є3—Cambrian system, upper section—dolomites, limestones, calcareous conglomerates, gypsum-bearing mudstones.
Figure 2. Geological map of Daldyn-Alakit (a) and Sredne-Markhinsky (b) diamond-bearing areas. Q—Quaternary system, undivided sediments—lluvial sands, pebbles, lacustrine-bog silts, peat; J—Jurassic system, undivided sediments—sandstones, siltstones, mudstones, conglomerates, coal lenses; T—Triassic system, undivided sediments—sandstones, siltstones, mudstones, conglomerates, limestones; P—Permian system, undivided sediments—sandstones, mudstones, shales, conglomerates, coals; O1—Ordovician system, lower section—dolomites, limestones, calcareous sandstones; Є3—Cambrian system, upper section—dolomites, limestones, calcareous conglomerates, gypsum-bearing mudstones.
Environsciproc 05 00004 g002
Figure 3. Ecological and geochemical characteristics of research objects based on the total pollution indicator (Zc) of soil cover: (a) Udachninsky MPP, (b) Aikhalsky MPP, (c) Nuyrbinsky MPP.
Figure 3. Ecological and geochemical characteristics of research objects based on the total pollution indicator (Zc) of soil cover: (a) Udachninsky MPP, (b) Aikhalsky MPP, (c) Nuyrbinsky MPP.
Environsciproc 05 00004 g003
Table 1. Geochemical characteristics of soils of the diamond-bearing regions of Siberia.
Table 1. Geochemical characteristics of soils of the diamond-bearing regions of Siberia.
Land-Based Ecosystem ComponentZc-Forming ElementsTotal Zc Pollution IndexOther Integral Indicators
Daldyn-Alakit diamond-bearing area
Udachny MPPout of impact zone Co, Cr, Cu6.7–30.3STI—0.037
pH—5.8–6.9
Degree of salinity—not saline
in the impact zone Ni, Cr, Co, Mn, Cu, As, Ti, Y, Nb, Li, Be, Sr18.7–144.3STI—1.2–1.5
pH—7.8–8.4
Degree of salinity-highly saline
Type of salinity-chloride/sulfate-chloride
Aikhalsky MPPout of impact zoneMn, Cr, Ni, Cu32.5–55.9STI—0.01–0.4
pH—5.2–7.3
Degree of salinity—not saline
in the impact zoneMn, V, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb20.7–184.9STI—0.3–0.5
pH—6.8–7.2
Degree of salinity-slightly and moderately saline
Type of salinity-chloride
Sredne-Markhinsky diamond-bearing region
Nyurbinsky MPPout of impact zoneMn, Cu, Ni, Cr, Co8.7–25.9* STI—0.04
pH—4.5–6.12
Degree of salinity—not saline
in the impact zoneMn, Cu, Ni, Zn, Pb30.1–840.0STI—0.1–0.3
pH—6.8–7.2
Degree of salinity-slightly and moderately saline
Type of salinity-sulfate-chloride/chloride
Note: * STI—sum of toxic ions.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Legostaeva, Y.; Gololobova, A.; Popov, V. Geochemical Risks of Diamond Mining in Siberia. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 5, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2020-08907

AMA Style

Legostaeva Y, Gololobova A, Popov V. Geochemical Risks of Diamond Mining in Siberia. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021; 5(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2020-08907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Legostaeva, Yana, Anna Gololobova, and Vladimir Popov. 2021. "Geochemical Risks of Diamond Mining in Siberia" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 5, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2020-08907

APA Style

Legostaeva, Y., Gololobova, A., & Popov, V. (2021). Geochemical Risks of Diamond Mining in Siberia. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2020-08907

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop