Next Article in Journal
Migration and Multiplication of Pathogenic Bursaphelenchus xylophilus Isolates of Diverse Geographic Origins
Previous Article in Journal
A Survey of Potential Insect Vectors of Mountain Pine Proliferation Decline Phytoplasma in Curonian Spit, Lithuania
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Coniferous Cones as a Forestry Waste Biomass—A Source of Antioxidants †

Institute of Chemistry, University of Sopron, H-9400 Sopron, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Forests—Forests for a Better Future: Sustainability, Innovation, Interdisciplinarity, 15–30 November 2020; Available online: https://iecf2020.sciforum.net.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 3(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07766
Published: 10 November 2020

Abstract

:
The cones of conifers are a waste biomass, potentially be utilized for a variety of purposes, including the extraction of bioactive materials, particularly antioxidant polyphenols. In the present work we conducted a comparative analysis of the antioxidant content of selected taxa that are either common in Hungary or that have not yet been investigated in any great detail (Cedrus atlantica, Larix decidua, Picea abies, Pinus mugo, Pinus nigra, Pinus sylvestris, Pinus wallichiana, Tsuga Canadensis, Tsuga heterophylla, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, Taxodium distichum, Thuja occidentalis, Metasequoia glyptostroboides, Thuja orientalis, Cryptomeria Japonica, Cunninghamia lanceolata). A comparison of different maturation stages (green, mature, and opened cones) was carried out for the assigned taxa. Folin-Ciocâlteu total phenol content, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays were used to assess the antioxidant contents. Total antioxidant power was determined by a scoring system that combined the three assay results. For each taxon the overall best results were found for green cones, followed by mature, and opened cones. Taxa with the highest scores were Tsuga Canadensis, Metasequoia glyptostroboides, Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, Cryptomeria Japonica, Thuja orientalis and Picea abies. High-performance liquid chromatographic/tandem mass spectrometric profiling of the polyphenols was completed for selected samples. Results provide a basis for future bioactivity testing of these samples. The research was supported by the ÚNKP-20-5-12 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund and by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4931/3/1/82/s1.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hofmann, T.; Albert, L.; Bocz, B.; Bocz, D.; Visi-Rajczi, E. Coniferous Cones as a Forestry Waste Biomass—A Source of Antioxidants. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 3, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07766

AMA Style

Hofmann T, Albert L, Bocz B, Bocz D, Visi-Rajczi E. Coniferous Cones as a Forestry Waste Biomass—A Source of Antioxidants. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021; 3(1):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07766

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hofmann, Tamás, Levente Albert, Balázs Bocz, Dániel Bocz, and Eszter Visi-Rajczi. 2021. "Coniferous Cones as a Forestry Waste Biomass—A Source of Antioxidants" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 3, no. 1: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07766

APA Style

Hofmann, T., Albert, L., Bocz, B., Bocz, D., & Visi-Rajczi, E. (2021). Coniferous Cones as a Forestry Waste Biomass—A Source of Antioxidants. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 3(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07766

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop