Next Article in Journal
A Study on the Diversity of Natural Arbutus unedo Hellenic Populations
Previous Article in Journal
Forest Genetic Monitoring in a Biodiversity Hotspot
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Genetic Diversity of Silver Fir (Abies alba) and European Beech (Fagus sylvatica) Populations from the South-Eastern Limits of Their Natural Distribution †

by
Eleftheria Dalmaris
1,
Nikolaos Tourvas
1 and
Filippos A. Aravanopoulos
1,2,*
1
Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 238, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Hellenic Agricultural Academy, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Forests—Exploring New Discoveries and New Directions in Forests, 15–31 October 2022. Available online: https://iecf2022.sciforum.net.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 22(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13129
Published: 31 October 2022

Abstract

:
Observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity, as well as allelic richness (AR) were calculated using Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR) genotyping for two important European keystone forest tree species. Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica are under pressure in a large part of their distribution due to climate change. Since Greece is their south-eastern limits, climatic pressure is even higher. As rear edge/peripheral populations, it is expected to harbor valuable and well-adapted germplasm in conditions such as those expected in central Europe by the end of the century. Comparison of their genetic variation amongst the Greek marginal populations and population from the SW, S or main range of their distribution was performed, finding no statistical differences.

1. Introduction

Greece, as part of the Mediterranean Basin, is considered to be one of the twenty-five global biodiversity hotspots [1]. It ranks third in Europe and fourth in the Mediterranean Basin in terms of species richness [2]. The expected increase of temperature and drought categorize Greece, and similarly the whole Mediterranean Basin, among the most vulnerable areas of Europe [3]. According to most species’ distribution models, two of the most important keystone European tree forest species, Abies alba (silver fir) and Fagus sylvatica (European beech) are expected to face survival issues in parts of their distribution range due to the upcoming change of the climate [4,5,6,7]. In the long term, the persistence of the marginal Greek populations that constitute the species’ south-eastern limit of natural expansion [8,9] is not certain. Moreover, such populations are highly important as a genetic reserve well adapted to xerothermic conditions [10].
Abies alba has been showing a declining trend in its growth at its south-western limit that is related to increasing temperatures [8], and in general in its distribution range [5]. Fagus sylvatica populations have shown a shift north-east and to higher altitudes due to climate change, where climatological conditions are more favorable [4,11], with a potential habitudinal loss at the southern edge of its distribution [11,12]. In fact, according to a study, if no measures are taken by 2100, the forest cover of Greece will shrink, including areas of Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica [13]. Therefore, it is of high interest to evaluate the genetic variation of the most south-eastern marginal populations of these valuable tree species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling, DNA Extraction, SSR Genotyping and Data Analysis

Plant material was collected from the most south-eastern population for each of the species (1) Abies alba (Figure 1a) (Mt Pinovo; 41° 7′ 12.54″ N, 22° 4′ 20.76″ E; altitude: 1266 m asl) and (2) Fagus sylvatica (Figure 1b) (Mt Oxia; 38° 46’ 36.06’’N, 21° 58′ 37.08″ E; altitude 1686m asl). Selected trees were spatially distributed (minimum distance 30 m), in order to avoid sampling related individuals. The material was stored at −80 °C until processed for DNA extraction using the Nucleospin Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany).
Genetic diversity was assessed for Abies alba using twelve microsatellite loci in two combinations [14,15,16] (Combination A: Aat11, Aat15, SF1, NFF7, NFH3, NFF3; Combination B: Aat01, Aat04, Aat06, Aag01, SFb4 and NFH15) and for Fagus sylvatica using fifteen microsatellite loci in three combinations [17] (Combination A: sfc0036, csolfagus31, sfc_1143, FS1_15; Combination B: csolfagus19, csolfagus_05, csolfagus_29, csolfagus_06; Combination C: DES576_A0F, EEU75_A0, DUKCT_A0, EJV8T_A0, EMILY_A0, ERHBI_A0, contact14_A0).
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) products were run on an ABI Prism 3730xl (Applied Biosystems Foster City, CA, USA) sequencer with GS500LIZ_3730 (Applied Biosystems Foster City, CA, USA) as the internal size standard. Allelic profiles were scored by automatic binning and visual checking using the GeneMapper Software v4.1 (Applied Biosystems Foster City, CA, USA). Observed and Expected heterozygosity were calculated using GeneAlex ver. 6.5 [18] and HP-Rare for allelic richness [19].

2.2. Comparing Populations

Results on a per species basis were compared to those of populations from the main distribution range. To this end, a journal literature search was conducted for studies using SSRs that included common loci.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed for each of the species using the R 3.5.0 package (https://www.R-project.org/, accessed on 23 November 2022, Vienna, Austria) to detect if differences exist amongst the Greek marginal populations and populations from the main range or from Spanish, French or Italian parts of their distribution.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Comparison of the Abies alba Marginal Population with Populations from Others Parts of Their Distribution

The observed heterozygosity of the Greek population at Mt Pinovo averaged 0.452; the expected heterozygosity averaged 0.534, whereas allelic richness averaged 6.29. The statistical analysis showed no significant differences of Ho, He (Figure 2a,b) and AR (Figure 2c,d) amongst (i) Mt Pinovo (SE margin) (ii) Spain (SW part of the distribution) [20,21] (iii) Italy (S part of the distribution) [22,23,24,25,26] and (iv) main rage of the distribution of A. alba [22,26,27,28,29,30,31].
The absolute averages of Ho and He from Mt Pinovo are showed to be similar to populations from Spain [20,21], but lower from populations in Italy [22,23,24], from Central Europe such as the Czech Republic [30], Germany [20], Poland [31] and the Balkans [29]. Studies that assessed the Ho and He from the Romanian Carpathians showed them to have either much higher [27] or much lower [28] averages. Some populations from Italy [25,26] are showed to have lower values compared to this study.
As for the absolute average of allelic richness, Mt Pinovo was higher than a number of Italian populations [22,25,26] as well as from Slovakia and Ukraine [29]. On the other hand, populations from Italy [23,24] and also from Central and northern Balkans were showed to have much higher AR than Mt Pinovo [27,29].

3.2. Comparison of the Fagus sylvatica Marginal Population with Populations from Others Parts of Their Distribution

The observed heterozygosity in the Greek population of the Mt. Oxia population averaged 0.732, and the expected 0.753. Furthermore, allelic richness averaged 6.63. No statistical differences were found in all three genetic diversity parameters (Figure 3a–d; Ho, He and AR) amongst (i) Mt Oxia (SE margin) (ii) Spain and France [32,33,34] (SW part of the distribution) and (iii) core area of the distribution of F. sylvatica [33,34,35,36].
In absolute values, Ho and He of Mt Oxia are lower than those of populations from western Europe (France) [32,33], Central Europe (Switzerland and Czech Republic) [35,36] and Northern Balkan countries [34]. Populations from Spain, Italy and Bulgaria [34] have shown comparable values.
Furthermore, Mt Oxia’s AR was higher than South Eastern French populations [32] and comparable to the values of populations from other parts of France [33] and Switzerland [35].

4. Conclusions

The genetic variation (Ho, He and AR) of the Greek marginal populations, when compared with populations from the southwest or the south parts of their distribution or with their main range, showed no statistical differences. Based on several species’ distribution models, the upcoming change of the climate might lead to habitual losses for a number of European species, including Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica. Greek populations are well adapted to xerothermic conditions, and therefore can provide valuable genetic material to European populations that may face survival issues. Consequently, the conservation of their genetic resources is of high priority.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECF2022-13129/s1.

Author Contributions

E.D. is responsible for the formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft preparation and visualization; N.T. is responsible for the data curation; F.A.A. is responsible for conceptualization, methodology, validation, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) through the Operational Programme «Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning» in the context of the project “Reinforcement of Postdoctoral Researchers—2nd Cycle” (MIS-5033021), implemented by the State Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Vaggelis Garatidis, Ismini Vasiliou and Nikos Yfanti for the help and support in collecting parts of the material needed for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; da Fonseca, G.A.B.; Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aravanopoulos, F.A.; Alizoti, P.G.; Farsakoglou, A.-M.; Malliarou, E.; Avramidou, E.V.; Tourvas, N. State of Biodiversity and Forest Genetic Resources in Greece in Relation to Conservation. In Forests of Southeast Europe Under a Changing Climate: Conservation of Genetic Resources; Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Milovanović, J., Nonić, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 73–83. [Google Scholar]
  3. European Commision. Green Paper from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—Adapting to climate change in Europe–options for EU action {SEC(2007) 849}/* COM/2007/0354 final */. 2007. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52007DC0354 (accessed on 23 November 2022).
  4. Falk, W.; Hempelmann, N. Species Favourability Shift in Europe due to Climate Change: A Case Study for Fagus sylvatica L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. Based on an Ensemble of Climate Models. J. Climatol. 2013, 2013, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Fréjaville, T.; Fady, B.; Kremer, A.; Ducousso, A.; Benito Garzón, M. Inferring phenotypic plasticity and population responses to climate across tree species ranges using forest inventory data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2019, 28, 1259–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Diaci, J.; Rozenbergar, D.; Anic, I.; Mikac, S.; Saniga, M.; Kucbel, S.; Visnjic, C.; Ballian, D. Structural dynamics and synchronous silver fir decline in mixed old-growth mountain forests in Eastern and Southeastern Europe. Forestry 2011, 84, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gárate-Escamilla, H.; Hampe, A.; Vizcaíno-Palomar, N.; Robson, T.M.; Benito Garzón, M. Range-wide variation in local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity of fitness-related traits in Fagus sylvatica and their implications under climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2019, 28, 1336–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gazol, A.; Camarero, J.J.; Gutiérrez, E.; Popa, I.; Andreu-Hayles, L.; Motta, R.; Nola, P.; Ribas, M.; Sangüesa-Barreda, G.; Urbinati, C.; et al. Distinct effects of climate warming on populations of silver fir (Abies alba) across Europe. J. Biogeogr. 2015, 42, 1150–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Korakis, G. Forest Botany. Available online: https://repository.kallipos.gr/handle/11419/742 (accessed on 23 November 2022).
  10. Fady, B.; Aravanopoulos, F.A.; Alizoti, P.; Mátyás, C.; von Wühlisch, G.; Westergren, M.; Belletti, P.; Cvjetkovic, B.; Ducci, F.; Huber, G.; et al. Evolution-based approach needed for the conservation and silviculture of peripheral forest tree populations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 375, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kramer, K.; Degen, B.; Buschbom, J.; Hickler, T.; Thuiller, W.; Sykes, M.T.; de Winter, W. Modelling exploration of the future of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under climate change—Range, abundance, genetic diversity and adaptive response. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 2213–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fyllas, N.M.; Koufaki, T.; Sazeides, C.I.; Spyroglou, G.; Theodorou, K. Potential impacts of climate change on the habitat suitability of the dominant tree species in Greece. Plants 2022, 11, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vella, E.; Kyriakopoulou, E.; Tsiaoussi, V.; Doulgeris, C.; Kemitzoglou, D.; Xepapadeas, A.; Papadimos, D.; Seferlis, M.; Chrysopolitou, V. Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity and Ecosystems. 2011. Available online: https://www.bankofgreece.gr/Publications/ClimateChange_FullReport_bm.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2022).
  14. Postolache, D.; Leonarduzzi, C.; Piotti, A.; Spanu, I.; Roig, A.; Fady, B.; Roschanski, A.; Liepelt, S.; Vendramin, G.G. Transcriptome versus Genomic Microsatellite Markers: Highly informative multiplexes for genotyping Abies alba Mill. and congeneric species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 32, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cremer, E.; Liepelt, S.; Sebastiani, F.; Buonamici, A.; Michalczyk, I.M.; Ziegenhagen, B.; Vendramin, G.G. Identification and characterization of nuclear microsatellite loci in Abies alba Mill. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 374–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hansen, O.K.; Vendramin, G.G.; Sebastiani, F.; Edwards, K.J. Development of microsatellite markers in Abies nordmanniana (Stev.) Spach and cross-species amplification in the Abies genus. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5, 784–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lefevre, S.; Wagner, S.; Petit, R.J.; de Lafontaine, G. Multiplexed microsatellite markers for genetic studies of beech. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2012, 12, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinf. (Oxf. Engl.) 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Kalinowski, S.T. hp-rare 1.0: A computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sancho-Knapik, D.; Peguero-Pina, J.J.; Cremer, E.; Camarero, J.; Cancio, Á.; Ibáñez, N.; Konnert, M.; Pelegrín, E. Genetic and environmental characterization of Abies alba Mill. populations at its western rear edge. Pirineos 2014, 169, e007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dering, M.; Sękiewicz, K.; Boratyńska, K.; Litkowiec, M.; Iszkuło, G.; Romo, A.; Boratyński, A. Genetic diversity and inter-specific relations of western Mediterranean relic Abies taxa as compared to the Iberian A. alba. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2014, 209, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Belletti, P.; Ferrazzini, D.; Ducci, F.; De Rogatis, A.; Mucciarelli, M.; Mucciarelli, M. Genetic diversity of Italian populations of Abies alba. Dendrobiology 2017, 77, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ducci, F.; De Rogatis, A.; Proietti, R.; Curtu, A.L.; Marchi, M.; Benetti, P. Establishing a baseline to monitor future climate-change-effects on peripheral populations of Abies alba in central Apennines. Ann. For. Res. 2021, 64, 33–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Luca, D.; Menale, B.; Caputo, P.; Cennamo, P. Population genetics analysis in a relic population of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) in southern Italy: A comparison with microsatellites and reference data. Plant Biosyst. 2017, 151, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leonarduzzi, C.; Piotti, A.; Spanu, I.; Vendramin, G.G. Effective gene flow in a historically fragmented area at the southern edge of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) distribution. Tree Genet. Genomes 2016, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Piotti, A.; Leonarduzzi, C.; Postolache, D.; Bagnoli, F.; Spanu, I.; Brousseau, L.; Urbinati, C.; Leonardi, S.; Vendramin, G.G. Unexpected scenarios from Mediterranean refugial areas: Disentangling complex demographic dynamics along the Apennine distribution of silver fir. J. Biogeogr. 2017, 44, 1547–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Teodosiu, M.; Mihai, G.; Fussi, B.; Ciocîrlan, E. Genetic diversity and structure of Silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) at the south-eastern limit of its distribution range. Ann. For. Res. 2019, 62, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Todea Morar, I.M.; Rensen, S.; Vilanova, S.; Boscaiu, M.; Holonec, L.; Sestras, A.F.; Vicente, O.; Prohens, J.; Sestras, R.E.; Plazas, M. Genetic relationships and reproductive traits of Romanian populations of silver ir (Abies alba): Implications for the sustainable management of local populations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gömöry, D.; Paule, L.; Krajmerová, D.; Romšáková, I.; Longauer, R. Admixture of genetic lineages of different glacial origin: A case study of Abies alba Mill. in the Carpathians. Plant Syst. Evol. 2012, 298, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cvrčková, H.; Máchová, P.M.; Malá, J. Use of nuclear microsatellite loci for evaluating genetic diversity among selected populations of Abies alba Mill. in the Czech Republic. J. For. Sci. 2015, 61, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Paluch, J.; Zarek, M.; Kempf, M. The effect of population density on gene flow between adult trees and the seedling bank in Abies alba Mill. Eur. J. For. Res. 2019, 138, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lander, T.A.; Klein, E.K.; Roig, A.; Oddou-Muratorio, S. Weak founder effects but significant spatial genetic imprint of recent contraction and expansion of European beech populations. Heredity 2021, 126, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. de Lafontaine, G.; Ducousso, A.; Lefèvre, S.; Magnanou, E.; Petit, R.J. Stronger spatial genetic structure in recolonized areas than in refugia in the European beech. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 4397–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Höhn, M.; Major, E.; Avdagic, A.; Bielak, K.; Bosela, M.; Coll, L.; Dinca, L.; Giammarchi, F.; Ibrahimspahic, A.; Mataruga, M.; et al. Local characteristics of the standing genetic diversity of european beech with high within-region differentiation at the eastern part of the range. Can. J. For. Res. 2021, 51, 1791–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cuervo-Alarcon, L.; Arend, M.; Müller, M.; Sperisen, C.; Finkeldey, R.; Krutovsky, K.V. Genetic variation and signatures of natural selection in populations of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) along precipitation gradients. Tree Genet. Genomes 2018, 14, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zádrapová, D. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in Czech populations of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Metsanduslikud Uurim. 2021, 73, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution maps of (a) Abies alba and (b) Fagus sylvatica. Black circles in the inset of the maps indicate selected Greek populations.
Figure 1. Distribution maps of (a) Abies alba and (b) Fagus sylvatica. Black circles in the inset of the maps indicate selected Greek populations.
Environsciproc 22 00037 g001
Figure 2. Comparing: (a,b) Observed and Expected Heterozygosity and (c,d) Allelic Richness of Mt. Pinovo with populations from SW, S part of the region and the main region of Abies alba distribution. Ho from Slovakia (Sl.), Ukraine (Uk.) and Romania (Rom.) were not available. No AR was listed for populations from Spain. i: Mt Pinovo, ii: Spain [20,21], iii: Italy [22,23,24,25,26], iv: Main range [22,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Numbers in brackets are the references used.
Figure 2. Comparing: (a,b) Observed and Expected Heterozygosity and (c,d) Allelic Richness of Mt. Pinovo with populations from SW, S part of the region and the main region of Abies alba distribution. Ho from Slovakia (Sl.), Ukraine (Uk.) and Romania (Rom.) were not available. No AR was listed for populations from Spain. i: Mt Pinovo, ii: Spain [20,21], iii: Italy [22,23,24,25,26], iv: Main range [22,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Numbers in brackets are the references used.
Environsciproc 22 00037 g002
Figure 3. Comparing: (a,b) Observed and Expected Heterozygosity and (c,d) Allelic Richness of Mt. Oxia with populations from SW and the main region of Fagus sylvatica distribution. i: Mt Oxia, ii: SW Part [32,33,34], iii: Main range [33,34,35,36]. Numbers in brackets are the references used. Cat.: Catalonia, Bos.: Bosnia; Herz.: Herzegovina.
Figure 3. Comparing: (a,b) Observed and Expected Heterozygosity and (c,d) Allelic Richness of Mt. Oxia with populations from SW and the main region of Fagus sylvatica distribution. i: Mt Oxia, ii: SW Part [32,33,34], iii: Main range [33,34,35,36]. Numbers in brackets are the references used. Cat.: Catalonia, Bos.: Bosnia; Herz.: Herzegovina.
Environsciproc 22 00037 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dalmaris, E.; Tourvas, N.; Aravanopoulos, F.A. Genetic Diversity of Silver Fir (Abies alba) and European Beech (Fagus sylvatica) Populations from the South-Eastern Limits of Their Natural Distribution. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 22, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13129

AMA Style

Dalmaris E, Tourvas N, Aravanopoulos FA. Genetic Diversity of Silver Fir (Abies alba) and European Beech (Fagus sylvatica) Populations from the South-Eastern Limits of Their Natural Distribution. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 22(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dalmaris, Eleftheria, Nikolaos Tourvas, and Filippos A. Aravanopoulos. 2022. "Genetic Diversity of Silver Fir (Abies alba) and European Beech (Fagus sylvatica) Populations from the South-Eastern Limits of Their Natural Distribution" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 22, no. 1: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13129

APA Style

Dalmaris, E., Tourvas, N., & Aravanopoulos, F. A. (2022). Genetic Diversity of Silver Fir (Abies alba) and European Beech (Fagus sylvatica) Populations from the South-Eastern Limits of Their Natural Distribution. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 22(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13129

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop