Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Different Metrics for Analyzing the Troposphere/Stratosphere Transitions Using High-Resolution Ozonesondes
Previous Article in Journal
Local Climate Zones (LCZs) and Urban Morphological Parameters Using GIS: An Application to Italian Cities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Wintertime Variation in Carbonaceous Components of PM10 in the High Altitudes of Himalayas †

1
Division of Radio and Atmospheric Sciences, CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, Dr. K. S. Krishnan Road, New Delhi 110012, India
2
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
3
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES), Nainital 263001, India
4
Centre for Astroparticle Physics and Space Sciences, Bose Institute, Darjeeling 734102, India
5
Centre for Environmental Assessment and Climate Change (CEA&CC), G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora 263643, India
6
G. B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Mohal-Kullu 175126, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences, 16–31 July 2022; Available online: https://ecas2022.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 19(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12802
Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences)

Abstract

:
Carbonaceous aerosols play a significant role in the Earth’s atmospheric system by affecting visibility, the hydrological cycle, the climate, radiative forcing, and human health. The present study analyses PM10 samples that were collected at three distinct urban locations (Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling) over the Himalayan region of India during winter 2019. The mass concentrations of PM10 were recorded as 51 ± 16 μg m−3, 38 ± 9 μg m−3, and 52 ± 18 μg m−3 for Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling, respectively. Organic carbon (OC) dominated over elemental carbon (EC) and was found to be 50.2%, 42.8%, and 47% of total carbon (TC) at Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling, respectively. The respective mass concentrations of carbonaceous species [OC, EC, water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), and total carbonaceous aerosol (TCA)] were higher at Mohal-Kullu (OC: 11.1 ± 5.3, EC: 4.2 ± 1.9, WSOC: 5.3 ± 1.3 μg m−3, and TCA: 22.1 ± 10.4 μg m−3) followed by Darjeeling (OC: 5.4 ± 2.0, EC: 2.7 ± 1.0, WSOC: 3.9 ± 1.3 μg m−3, and TCA: 22.1 ± 10.4 μg m−3) and Nainital (OC: 2.9 ± 1.0, EC: 1.3 ± 0.6, WSOC: 2.1 ± 0.6 μg m−3, and TCA: 6.7 ± 2.4 μg m−3). The OC/EC and WSOC/OC ratio at Mohal-Kullu (2.6 ± 0.3, 0.6 ± 0.2), Nainital (2.0 ± 0.4, 0.7 ± 0.2), and Darjeeling (2.3 ± 0.5, 0.7 ± 0.2), respectively, indicates the dominance of fossil fuel combustion (coal and vehicular exhaust), with signified additional contribution from secondary organic carbon (SOC).

1. Introduction

Atmospheric aerosols are well known as a major pollutant worldwide due to their complex composition, their effects on visibility, and their effects on the heat balance of the Earth [1,2]. High loading of aerosol poses severe implications for human health, global climate change, and the Earth’s radiation budget [3,4]. Carbonaceous aerosols (CAs) are the key component of particulate matter (PM), constituting 20–70% of coarse particulate matter [4]. Carbonaceous components of PM are classified as organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), in terms of their optical and physical properties [4,5]. OC is emitted from combustion or indirectly from the heterogeneous oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). OC has a wide variety of organic compounds originating from various sources and it is further classified as primary organic carbon (POC) and secondary organic carbon (SOC), in terms of its formation. EC is emitted primarily from the incomplete combustion of biomass (BB) and fossil fuel combustion (FFC) [6,7,8]. As the CAs play a crucial role in atmospheric chemistry, Earth’s radiation budget, human health, and the air quality of the region, it is very important to measure the concentrations of the carbonaceous particles to understand their transport, their sources, and their deposition.
The Himalayan region is regarded as pristine and vulnerable to environmental change due to regional and global change [6]. There has been little research on carbonaceous particles, their sources, their movement, and their climatic effects [7,8,9,10,11,12,13] but are not adequate for studying the detailed effects of CAs on the environment. The present study on CAs at different altitudes of the Himalayas fills this gap to some extent
The present study estimates the concentration of CAs at different locations (Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling) in the Himalayan region of India during the winter season (January–February 2019). We chose the winter season for the study because of the increased BB and CC activity for heating purposes, as well as the steady and stagnant air conditions that can lead to large concentrations of CAs. Using ratios, we identify the origins and their contribution to CAs across the different study locations.

2. Methodology

2.1. Observation Sites

We conducted the study over different sites in the Himalayan region of India i.e., Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling.
Mohal-Kullu: G. B. Pant’s National Research Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Mohal-Kullu (31.9° N, 77.11° E, and 1154 m a.s.l.) is located in the western Himalayan region. The study site has a sub-temperate environment and receives heavy rain during the winter period.
Nainital: Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES), Nainital is located on Manora hill (29.39° N, 79.45° E, 1959 m a.s.l.) in the central Himalayan region.
Darjeeling: Bose Institute, Darjeeling (27.01° N, 88.15° E, 2200 m a.s.l.) is located in the eastern Himalayas. The study site is geographically adjacent to the Indo-Gangetic plain (IGP)region (a global hotspot for heavy aerosol loadings) [10]. A detailed description of the sampling location has been discussed in previous studies [7,8,9,10,14,15,16].

2.2. Sample Collection and Analysis

The PM10 samples were collected during the winter season (January–February 2019) twice every week for 24h using a respirable dust sampler with a flow rate of 1.2 m3 min−1 on pre-baked (550 °C for 5 h) Pall flex Tissuequartz filters (20 cm × 25 cm at three urban locations of Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling.
The measurements of carbonaceous species (OC, EC) in the PM10 samples collected over the study locations were carried out using an OC/EC analyzer. This instrument works on the thermal–optical approach. WSOC in the PM10 samples was quantified using a TOC analyzer (Model: TOC LCPH/CPN, Shimadzu), which works on the principle of catalytic-oxidation combustion at high temperatures of 680 °C. A WD-XRF (wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence) spectrometer was used for the quantification of the elements in PM10, ranging from Barium to Uranium. Details of the OC/EC analyzer, TOC analyzer, and WD-XRF spectrometer are available in references therein [9,10,11,12].

3. Result and Discussions

3.1. Mass Concentration of PM10 and Carbonaceous Components

In the present study, the average PM10 concentrations at Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling were 51 ± 16 μg m−3, 38 ± 9 μg m−3, and 52 ± 18 μg m−3, respectively.
The findings that were acquired for the study sites are comparable to the previously reported PM10 aerosol mass and carbonaceous components at different sites in India (Table 1). In the present study, high concentrations of OC (Darjeeling: 5.36 ± 1.74 µg m−3; Nainital: 2.85 ± 0.75 µg m−3; Mohal-Kullu: 10.49 ± 4.56 µg m−3), EC (Darjeeling: 2.67 ± 0.87 µg m−3; Nainital: 1.30 ± 0.46 µg m−3; Mohal-Kullu: 4.06 ± 1.99 µg m−3), and WSOC (Darjeeling: 3.93 ± 1.17 µg m−3; Nainital: 2.04 ± 0.54 µg m−3; Mohal-Kullu: 5.23 ± 1.35 µg m−3) were observed (Figure 1a). The high concentrations of carbonaceous components might be due to the increased contribution from wood burning for household heating, open biomass burning, and the stable atmospheric conditions leading to pollution deposition within the lower atmosphere [4,6]. The observed OC and EC concentrations are in good accordance with other reported studies (Table 1). The SOC and POC were quantified in this study using the EC tracer method [5].
At Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling, an average POC concentration was observed as8.24 ± 3.73 μg m−3, 2.13 ± 0.93 μg m−3, and 3.41 ± 1.27 μg m−3, respectively, during the study period (Table 1). The SOC concentration was observed as 2.90 ± 1.97 μg m−3, 0.75 ± 0.36 μg m−3, and 1.99 ± 1.10 μg m−3 at Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling, respectively.

3.2. Diagnostic Ratios and Scatter Plots

The diagnostic ratios of OC/EC and WSOC/OC are important for the identification of CA emission sources and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and their removal rates and the aging of the atmospheric aerosols [17,18,19,20]. Figure 1b shows the OC with EC and the WSOC with OC ratios at Mohal-Kullu (2.6 ± 0.3, 0.6 ± 0.2), Nainital (2.3 ± 0.4, 0.7 ± 0.1), and Darjeeling (2.06 ± 0.37, 0.7 ± 0.2), respectively, which indicates the frequent practices of biomass burning during the season and the formation of SOC due to the transported carbonaceous species (Figure 2) from the nearby IGP region [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The acquired ratios of OC with EC and WSOC with OC are in good agreement with earlier reported studies [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
The OC and EC exhibited a significant correlation throughout the study period (Darjeeling: R2 = 0.765; Nainital: R2 = 0.854; Mohal-Kullu: R2 = 0.912) (Figure 2a), indicating similar sources of CAs (fossil-fuel combustion and BB) and the emission potential of the sources [4,20,22]. Throughout the study, a significant correlation of WSOC with OC (Figure 2b) was observed over the study sites (Mohal-Kullu: R2 = 0.693; Darjeeling: R2 = 0.563; Nainital: R2 = 0.671), which might be due to water-soluble SOA formation [6,11,20,22]. Over the study regions, the influx of pollutants from the IGP region and the local sources could be the major contributing sources of the carbonaceous species (Figure 3).

4. Conclusions

The CAs that are associated with PM10 have been studied during the winter season at different sites of the IHR, i.e., Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling. The mean concentration of PM10 was 51 ± 16 μg m−3, 38 ± 9 μg m−3, and 52 ± 18 μg m−3 at Mohal-Kullu, Nainital, and Darjeeling, respectively. The major results of the study are summarized below as follows:
  • In the present study, the winter concentrations of OC (Darjeeling: 5.36 ± 1.74 µg m−3; Nainital: 2.85 ± 0.75 µg m−3; Mohal-Kullu: 10.49 ± 4.56 µg m−3), EC (Darjeeling: 2.67 ± 0.87 µg m−3; Nainital: 1.30 ± 0.46 µg m−3; Mohal-Kullu: 4.06 ± 1.99 µg m−3), and WSOC (Darjeeling: 3.93 ± 1.17 µg m−3; Nainital: 2.04 ± 0.54 µg m−3; Mohal-Kullu: 5.23 ± 1.35 µg m−3) were observed due to the enhanced contribution from wood burning for household purposes, open biomass burning, and stable atmospheric conditions.
  • Overall, the diagnostic ratios of OC with EC, WSOC with OC, and SOC with OC showed their positive association with carbonaceous components and a major influence of BB as a source of carbonaceous species over the IHR. A linear regression analysis was performed among the carbon components OC, EC, WSOC, and SOC for more information on the sources of CAs. The OC and EC exhibited significant correlation throughout the study period, which can be attributed to the common nature of their sources;
  • The long-range transported aerosols from the IGP region and the surrounding areas contribute to the carbonaceous species, along with local emissions.

Author Contributions

The conceptualization was performed by N.C. and S.K.S.; the data collection and analysis were performed by N.C., P.S., S.M., A.R., M.D., J.C.K., R.L., A.C., S.G., M.N., T.K.M. and S.K.S.; the first draft was written by N.C. and S.K.S.; the data interpretation was carried out by N.C., S.M., A.R., M.D., J.C.K., A.C., M.N., T.K.M. and S.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thankfully acknowledged the Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (Government of India), New Delhi-110016, India, for providing financial support for this study (DST/CCP/Aerosol/88/2017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets developed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors (N.C., S.G., S.K.S., and T.K.M.) are thankful to Director and Head, Environmental Science and Biomedical Division (ES&BMD), CSIR-NPL for their encouragement and support. The authors (N.K. and S.K.S.) thankfully acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, New Delhi, India for providing financial support for the study and NOAA Air Resources Laboratory for download trajectories.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weagle, C.L.; Snider, G.; Li, C.; van Donkelaar, A.; Philip, S.; Bissonnette, P.; Burke, J.; Jackson, J.; Latimer, R.; Stone, E.; et al. Global Sources of Fine Particulate Matter: Interpretation of PM2.5 Chemical Composition Observed by SPARTAN using a Global Chemical Transport Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 11670–11681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ramanathan, V.; Crutzen, P.; Kiehl, J.; Rosenfeld, D. Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle. Science 2002, 294, 2119–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yadav, S.; Tripathi, S.N.; Rupakheti, M. Current Status of Source Apportionment of Ambient Aerosols in India. Atmos. Environ. 2022, 274, 118987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ram, K.; Sarin, M.M. Carbonaceous Aerosols over Northern India: Sources and Apatio-temporal Variability. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 2012, 78, 523–533. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lim, H.J.; Turpin, B.J. Origins of Primary and Secondary Organic Aerosol in Atlanta: Results of Time-resolved Measurements during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4489–4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Soni, A.; Kumar, U.; Prabhu, V.; Shridhar, V. Characterization, Source Apportionment and Carcinogenic Risk Assessment of Atmospheric Particulate Matter at Dehradun, situated in the Foothills of Himalayas. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2020, 199, 105205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sharma, S.K.; Choudhary, N.; Kotnala, G.; Das, D.; Mukherjee, S.; Ghosh, A.; Vijayan, N.; Rai, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Mandal, T.K. Wintertime Carbonaceous Species and Trace Metals in PM10 in Darjeeling: A High Altitude Town in the Eastern Himalayas. Urban Clim. 2020, 34, 100668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rai, A.; Mukherjee, S.; Chatterjee, A.; Choudhary, N.; Kotnala, G.; Mandal, T.K.; Sharma, S.K. Seasonal variation of OC, EC, and WSOC of PM10 and Their CWT analysis over the Eastern Himalaya. Aerosol Sci. Eng. 2020, 4, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sheoran, R.; Dumka, U.C.; Kaskaoutis, D.G.; Grivas, G.; Ram, K.; Prakash, J.; Hooda, R.K.; Tiwari, R.K.; Mihalopoulos, N. Chemical Composition and Source Apportionment o fTotal Suspended Particulate in the Central Himalayan Region. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chatterjee, A.; Mukherjee, S.; Dutta, M.; Ghosh, A.; Ghosh, S.K.; Roy, A. High rise in carbonaceous aerosols under very low anthropogenic emissions over eastern Himalaya, India: Impact of lock down for COVID-19 outbreak. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 244, 117947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharma, S.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Choudhary, N.; Rai, A.; Ghosh, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Vijayan, N.; Mandal, T. Seasonal variation and sources of carbonaceous species and elements in PM2.5 and PM10 over the eastern Himalaya. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 51642–51656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kaushal, D.; Kumar, A.; Yadav, S.; Tandon, A.; Attri, A. Wintertime carbonaceous aerosols over Dhauladhar region of North-Western Himalayas. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 8044–8056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sarkar, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Singh, A.K.; Ghosh, S.K.; Raha, S. Characterization of black carbon aerosols over Darjeeling-Ahigh altitude Himalayan station in eastern India. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2015, 15, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuniyal, J.C.; Chandra, J.; Guleria, P.R. Aerosols optical properties prone to climate change over Mohal-Kullu in the northwestern Himalaya, India. In Proceedings of the Conference of Indian Aerosol Science and Technology Association on: Aerosols and Clouds: Climate Change Perspective, Darjeeling, India, 24–26 March 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hegde, P.; Kawamura, K.; Joshi, H.; Naja, M. Organic and inorganic components of aerosols over the central Himalayas: Winter and summer variations in stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016, 23, 6102–6118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Naja, M.; Bhardwaj, P.; Singh, N.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, R.; Ojha, N.; Sagar, R.; Satheesh, S.K.; Moorthy, K.K.; Kotamarthi, V.R. High-Frequency Vertical Profiling of Meteorological Parameters Using AMF1 Facility during RAWEX–GVAX at ARIES, Nainital. Curr. Sci. 2016, 111, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Andreae, M.O.; Merlet, P. Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2001, 15, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ram, K.; Sarin, M.M.; Hegde, P. Atmospheric abundances of primary and secondary carbonaceous species at two high-altitude sites in India: Sources and temporal variability. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 6785–6796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Schauer, J.J.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, L.; Wei, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shao, M. Characteristics of Particulate Carbon Emissions from Real-World Chinese Coal Combustion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5068–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ram, K.; Sarin, M.M. Atmospheric Carbonaceous Aerosols from Indo-Gangetic Plain and Central Himalaya: Impact of Anthropogenic Sources. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 148, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aggarwal, S.G.; Kawamura, K.; Umarji, G.S.; Tachibana, E.; Patil, R.S.; Gupta, P.K. Organic and Inorganic Markers and Stable C-, N-Isotopic Compositions of Tropical Coastal Aerosols from Megacity Mumbai: Sources of Organic Aerosols and Atmospheric Processing. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 13, 4667–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rengarajan, R.; Sarin, M.M.; Sudheer, A.K. Carbonaceous and Inorganic Species in Atmospheric Aerosols during Wintertime over Urban and High-Altitude Sites in North India. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112, D21307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Mass concentration of carbonaceous components of PM10 (b) diagnostic ratios of carbonaceous components at different study sites of the Indian Himalayan Region IHR.
Figure 1. (a) Mass concentration of carbonaceous components of PM10 (b) diagnostic ratios of carbonaceous components at different study sites of the Indian Himalayan Region IHR.
Environsciproc 19 00016 g001
Figure 2. Scatter plots of carbonaceous components of PM10 (a) OC with EC (b) WSOC with OC (c) SOC with OC at different sites of the IHR.
Figure 2. Scatter plots of carbonaceous components of PM10 (a) OC with EC (b) WSOC with OC (c) SOC with OC at different sites of the IHR.
Environsciproc 19 00016 g002
Figure 3. Wintertime air-mass backward trajectories of the study sites at 500 m AGL.
Figure 3. Wintertime air-mass backward trajectories of the study sites at 500 m AGL.
Environsciproc 19 00016 g003
Table 1. Comparison of carbonaceous components and their mass ratios over high altitude locations in India.
Table 1. Comparison of carbonaceous components and their mass ratios over high altitude locations in India.
Sampling
Site
Altitude
(m asl)
Time
Period
PM10
(µg m−3)
OC
(µg m−3)
EC
(µg m−3)
WSOC
(µg m−3)
OC/ECWSOC/OCReferences
Mohal-Kullu
(31.9° N, 77.11° E)
1154January–February
2019
51 ± 1610.4 ± 4.54.0 ± 1.95.2 ± 1.32.6 ± 0.30.55 ± 0.23Present
study
Nainital
(29.39° N, 79.45° E)
1959January–February
2019
38 ± 92.8 ± 0.71.3 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.52.3 ± 0.50.74 ± 0.15Present
study
Darjeeling
(27.01° N, 88.15° E)
2200January–February
2019
52 ± 185.3 ± 1.72.6 ± 0.83.9 ± 1.12.0 ± 0.30.74 ± 0.22Present
study
Pohara
(32.2° N, 76.2° E)
750January–April
2015
52 ± 196.8 ± 2.34.8 ± 2.0-1.5 ± 0.4-Kaushal et al.,
2018
Dharamshala
(32.2° N, 76.3° E)
1350February–April
2015
39 ± 235.0 ± 3.02.5± 0.6-2.0 ± 1.0-Kaushal et al.,
2018
Manora Peak
(29.39° N, 79.45° E)
1950February–March
2005
138 ± 7811.6 ± 5.91.8 ± 0.8-6.6 ± 0.3-Ram et al.,
2008
Palampur
(32.1° N, 76.5° E)
1300March
2013
47 ± 76.7 ± 2.21.6 ± 0.9-4.3-Sharma et al., 2014
Kullu
(32.2° N, 76.3° E)
1154March
2013
34 ± 14.8 ± 1.61.9 ± 0.7-2.9-Sharma et al.,
2014
Manora Peak
(29.39° N, 79.45° E)
19502014–201732.1± 2.78.1 ± 6.02.4 ± 1.5---Srivastava and Naja, 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choudhary, N.; Srivastava, P.; Dutta, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Rai, A.; Gupta, S.; Kuniyal, J.C.; Lata, R.; Chatterjee, A.; Naja, M.; et al. Wintertime Variation in Carbonaceous Components of PM10 in the High Altitudes of Himalayas. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 19, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12802

AMA Style

Choudhary N, Srivastava P, Dutta M, Mukherjee S, Rai A, Gupta S, Kuniyal JC, Lata R, Chatterjee A, Naja M, et al. Wintertime Variation in Carbonaceous Components of PM10 in the High Altitudes of Himalayas. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 19(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choudhary, Nikki, Priyanka Srivastava, Monami Dutta, Sauryadeep Mukherjee, Akansha Rai, Sakshi Gupta, Jagdish Chandra Kuniyal, Renu Lata, Abhijit Chatterjee, Manish Naja, and et al. 2022. "Wintertime Variation in Carbonaceous Components of PM10 in the High Altitudes of Himalayas" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 19, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12802

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop