Next Article in Journal
Equilibrium Moisture Content of Dead Fine Fuels of Pubescent Oak (Quercus pubescens Willd.) and Holm Oak (Quercus ilex L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Resistance Forest Stands and Landscape
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Integrating Pre-Season Planning with Event Response: The PODS—RMA Framework †

by
David Calkin
* and
Christopher O’Connor
US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT 59801, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Third International Conference on Fire Behavior and Risk, Sardinia, Italy, 3–6 May 2022.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017051
Published: 10 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Third International Conference on Fire Behavior and Risk)

Abstract

:
Over the last 5 years, researchers at the US Forest Service’s Rocky Mountain Research Station have worked with land managers to develop collaborative pre-season wildfire response and fuel management plans using the Potential Operational Delineations (PODs) process. Concurrently, team members have worked with wildfire management personnel and incident management participants to deliver new decision-support tools that aim to improve the effectiveness of incident response through the Risk Management Assistance program (RMA). These two efforts share a common set of background data that identify values at risk, locations where suppression actions are most likely to be effective, and areas where responders can safely and efficiently work. I will introduce the basic structure of PODs and RMA, discuss how these programs have been implemented, and finally discuss how they provide a common language and framework for considering fire management throughout the planning, mitigation, and response functions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization D.C. and C.O.; writing D.C.; editing C.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US Government determination or policy.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calkin, D.; O’Connor, C. Integrating Pre-Season Planning with Event Response: The PODS—RMA Framework. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017051

AMA Style

Calkin D, O’Connor C. Integrating Pre-Season Planning with Event Response: The PODS—RMA Framework. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 17(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calkin, David, and Christopher O’Connor. 2022. "Integrating Pre-Season Planning with Event Response: The PODS—RMA Framework" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 17, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017051

APA Style

Calkin, D., & O’Connor, C. (2022). Integrating Pre-Season Planning with Event Response: The PODS—RMA Framework. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 17(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017051

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop