Next Article in Journal
Leverage ArcGIS Remote Sensing Tools to Improve Wildfire Management
Previous Article in Journal
Tropical Waves and Their Transit through Cuba during the Period 2012–2020
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Effect of Incoming Wind on Combustion of Ornamental Vegetation at the Wildland–Urban Interface †

by
Anthony Graziani
*,
Karina Meerpoel-Pietri
,
Virginie Tihay-Felicelli
,
Paul-Antoine Santoni
and
Frédéric Morandini
Laboratoire Sciences pour l’Environnement, (UMR 6134 SPE), University of Corsica, 20250 Corte, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Third International Conference on Fire Behavior and Risk, Sardinia, Italy, 3–6 May 2022.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17(1), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017116
Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Third International Conference on Fire Behavior and Risk)
With global warming and rising occurrence of drought conditions, the risk of fire spreading at Wildland–Urban Interfaces (WUI) increases every year. In particular, during summer, the surrounding vegetation can reach extremely dry conditions. Under such critical atmospheric conditions, ornamental vegetation such as hedges or trees have been identified as a significant vector of fire propagation to homes [1,2,3]. Depending on vegetation’s spatial distribution and wind conditions, flames can ignite non-structural elements, which can result in total house fire.
In this context, the present study focuses on the influence of incoming wind on the flame dynamics and heat transfers from an ornamental hedge burning at field scale. Four experiments were carried out at Corte (France) during spring. A 4 m × 1 m × 1 m (L × W × H) vegetation hedge was reconstructed with a welded mesh cage filled with 32 (±0.05) kg of dried rockrose (FMC = 10%). The experimental setup included three visible cameras, six heat flux gauges (total and radiant) and one anemometer. The heat flux sensors were located at 3 m from the hedge according to the current fire safety regulation in France.
The analysis of the heat fluxes allowed us to decompose the signal into four stages (growth, fully developed, decrease and extinction) corresponding to specific levels of heat flux and flame size. The convective heat transfer towards the sensors is particularly significant during the fully developed stage of the fire. A comparison of flame geometry, heat fluxes, and wind properties was performed with a cross-correlation approach. The results highlight that flame geometry shows a high level of correlation for stages where fire grows inside the hedge then reaches a fully developed regime. The wind also has a significant impact on heat fluxes received by the sensor and to the resulting heat constraint on the building materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T.-F. and P.-A.S.; methodology, V.T.-F. and P.-A.S.; software, A.G. and K.M.-P.; validation, A.G., K.M.-P., V.T.-F., P.-A.S. and F.M.; formal analysis, A.G.; investigation, A.G.; resources, F.M.; data curation, A.G. and F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G., K.M.-P., V.T.-F., P.-A.S., F.M.; visualization, F.M.; supervision, V.T.-F. and P.-A.S.; project administration, V.T.-F.; funding acquisition, V.T.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the projects “MED-STAR” (Strategie e misure per la mitigazione del rischio di incendio nell’area Mediterranea) and “INTERMED” (Interventions pour gérer et réduire le risque d’incendie à l’interface habitat-espace naturel) financed by the fund PC IFM 2014–2020 (http://interreg-maritime.eu/fr/web/med-star).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maranghides, A.; Mell, W. A Case Study of a Community Affected by the Witch and Guejito Fires. Fire Technol. 2011, 47, 379–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ganteaume, A.; Jappiot, M.; Lampin, C.; Guijarro, M.; Hernando, C. Flammability of Some Ornamental Species in Wildland–Urban Interfaces in Southeastern France: Laboratory Assessment at Particle Level. Environ. Manag. 2013, 52, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Maranghides, A.; McNamara, D.; Vihnanek, R.; Restaino, J.; Leland, C. A Case Study of a Community Affected by the Waldo Fire Event Timeline and Defensive Actions, Technical Note (NIST TN); National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2015. [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Graziani, A.; Meerpoel-Pietri, K.; Tihay-Felicelli, V.; Santoni, P.-A.; Morandini, F. Effect of Incoming Wind on Combustion of Ornamental Vegetation at the Wildland–Urban Interface. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 17, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017116

AMA Style

Graziani A, Meerpoel-Pietri K, Tihay-Felicelli V, Santoni P-A, Morandini F. Effect of Incoming Wind on Combustion of Ornamental Vegetation at the Wildland–Urban Interface. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 17(1):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Graziani, Anthony, Karina Meerpoel-Pietri, Virginie Tihay-Felicelli, Paul-Antoine Santoni, and Frédéric Morandini. 2022. "Effect of Incoming Wind on Combustion of Ornamental Vegetation at the Wildland–Urban Interface" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 17, no. 1: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017116

APA Style

Graziani, A., Meerpoel-Pietri, K., Tihay-Felicelli, V., Santoni, P. -A., & Morandini, F. (2022). Effect of Incoming Wind on Combustion of Ornamental Vegetation at the Wildland–Urban Interface. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 17(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022017116

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop