Next Article in Journal
GIS-AHP Approach to Select the Most Suitable Extraction System in Mediterranean Oak Coppices under Environmental Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
Simulations of Tesla Valve Micromixer for Water Purification with Fe3O4 Nanoparticles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Environmental Sciences Proceedings
Volume 16
Issue 1
10.3390/environsciproc2022016075
environsciproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Redouane Choukr-Allah
1 and
Abdelaziz Hirich
2,*
1
African Sustainable Agricultue Research Institute (ASARI), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Laayoune 70000, Morocco
2
Agricultural Innovation and Technology Transfer Center (AITTC), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 2nd International Laayoune Forum on Biosaline Agriculture, 14–16 June 2022; Available online: https://lafoba2.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 16(1), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016075
Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Laayoune Forum on Biosaline Agriculture)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Environment Sciences Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind; double-blind; triple-blind; open; other (please describe): double-blind and triple-blind for some papers
  • Conference submission management system: Sciforum
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 159
  • Number of submissions accepted: 124
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 78%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.2
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 37
  • Any additional information on the review process: N/A

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choukr-Allah, R.; Hirich, A. Statement of Peer Review. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 16, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016075

AMA Style

Choukr-Allah R, Hirich A. Statement of Peer Review. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 16(1):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choukr-Allah, Redouane, and Abdelaziz Hirich. 2022. "Statement of Peer Review" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 16, no. 1: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016075

APA Style

Choukr-Allah, R., & Hirich, A. (2022). Statement of Peer Review. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 16(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016075

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop