1. Introduction
Accounting for almost 40% of energy consumption in the European Union [
1], the role of existing building stock is instrumental in energy transition and the carbon neutrality goals of the built environment. To achieve this goal, it is crucial to improve the way we carry out building renovations [
2], increasing both the rate and depth of renovations [
3,
4]. An effective renovation plan that aims at zero-energy buildings, which balance a reduced energy demand against locally generated power, is essential to attain this goal. The integration of many components increases the complexity and the cost of those renovations, which is why industrialised solutions have been explored to improve the productivity of the construction industry [
5], benefiting from high-performance results while minimising on-site construction time by prefabricating retrofitting components [
6]. Nevertheless, the industrialization of renovation solutions needs to be made part of the supply chain operation and be prioritized in strategic decision-making [
7], which requires the involvement of different stakeholders of the building supply chain, resulting in important difficulties in communication and coordination.
To this end, the main goal of this paper is to map the renovation process and address the most important bottlenecks to make the renovation process more efficient. The objective is to identify the type of information that the stakeholders require during the different renovation phases, which can be used to structure the workflow between all actors. The study builds on previous experiences in research and practice, regarding identified relevant information and data that support the different phases of the renovation process. In the next step of the framework development, the findings of the analysis were used as base materials for designing an experts’ questionnaire, which had the dual purpose of validating these parameters while gathering relevant information about the renovation process in a systematic and organized manner.
2. Method
To identify the type of information that the stakeholders require during the different renovation phases and provide a framework to structure the workflow between all the actors involved during the renovation process, two main methodological steps were executed: (1) exploration of the current renovation workflow and (2) analysis of the experts’ interaction. First, a general overview of the current literature review and data available regarding the façade retrofitting processes was developed. The analysis considered 17 relevant R&I projects, retrieved from CORDIS [
8].
Based on this exploration, an experts’ questionnaire was developed to collect relevant information in a systematic and organised manner. Forty-two complete questionnaires were gathered after the campaign was over, considering different types of stakeholders in the building industry. Finally, an experts’ workshop was executed to validate the findings from the literature review and the questionnaire. The results of both steps are integrated in
Section 3, addressing the main topics of the study: (1) renovation process: phases and tasks; (2) information flow; and (3) main perceived bottlenecks.
3. Results
3.1. Renovation Process: Phases and Tasks
The exact number of phases and subphases might vary in the different publications [
9,
10,
11], but there is consensus on the main broad stages. These are the pre-project, which defines the need for the project; the pre-construction, when an appropriate design solution is developed; the construction, which implements the solution; and the post-construction, which aims at monitoring and the maintenance of the project.
In renovations, which are still construction projects, the phases mentioned above also apply [
12,
13,
14]. However, since renovations deal with an existing building, the pre-project phase includes the analysis and diagnostic of the building to define the intervention’s scope. Moreover, the current occupants, who might be there during construction, have a significant role in the execution phase, such as in the time planning. Industrialised renovation follows the same phases, but some sub-phases are specific or more essential compared to on-site renovation construction, particularly regarding the existing building analysis, the renovation design, and the components’ production. In the context of this study, the renovation phases have been defined as shown in
Table 1. The questionnaire followed those phases and elaborated on the core tasks per phase.
3.2. Information Flow
The information flow between the stakeholders is essential for the renovation process. Regarding the information that is required as inputs, most of them refer to information from the existing building, its envelope, and services. Moreover, other inputs refer to its occupation and operation, to information from the climate context, and cost data of building components and renovation activities. On the other hand, the main outputs along the renovation process refer to the generation of renovation scenarios and Building Information Models (BIM), energy flows data (consumption and generation), quality check and maintenance reports, Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs), and evaluations related to the cash-flow of the intervention.
During the experts’ interaction, the respondents stated the inputs they require to perform their tasks during each phase and their main outputs along the process.
Figure 1 presents the responses from the sample at each renovation phase, with colour codes based on the number of mentions for an easier appraisal of the results.
Figure 1a depicts the input types that are more commonly required by the sample of professionals, showing the relevance of counting with enough information about the building from the initial stages to construction. Cost information is particularly relevant as an input at the final design and construction phases, while operation inputs, although relevant throughout the whole process, are markedly more needed during phase 5.
Figure 1b follows the same pattern, showing the iterative process behind retrofitting design scenarios until the final design is set, and the energy use reports especially at the beginning and the end, to diagnose problems and later evaluate the solution, also considering comfort assessments. When it comes to the construction phase, the main declared outputs refer to guidelines for installation and assembly, logistics and planning, and budget estimations and cash-flow information.
3.3. Main Perceived Bottlenecks
The respondents were asked to mention the main bottlenecks they perceived based on their own experience, which would need to be solved to increase the efficiency of the overall renovation process. This was conducted through a set of questions aimed at each phase separately, targeting the experts that had previously declared to have personal experience at each phase. Seven main categories for the bottlenecks were identified, as follows: (1) lack of information; (2) unclear definitions; (3) normative and compliance; (4) coordination and communication; (5) responsibilities and guarantees; (6) unreliable assessments (7); and technical challenges.
The responses were then re-assessed and categorised based on the list of main types of bottlenecks, with the result being shown in
Figure 2. There, it is possible to see that most of the mentioned bottlenecks clearly refer to lack of information, and coordination and communication issues, followed by normative and compliance aspects throughout the process.
4. Discussion
Further elaboration centred around the most recurrent bottlenecks: (1) lack of information, and (2) coordination and communication. Regarding the lack of information, it was mentioned that it is important to establish clear responsibilities for gathering the information needed at each phase. Moreover, to support this, it was agreed that having a comprehensive building data checklist is necessary, considering the level of detail for said information at every step of the process. Nevertheless, even if responsibilities and data gathering activities are clearly defined, there is a relevant information gap at the early design stages, especially related to technical information that could otherwise serve as valuable input for the concept design.
Regarding coordination and communication issues, in general, it was perceived as crucial to clearly define the responsibilities of all stakeholders throughout the process. Likewise, it was stated as central to have a clear definition of the requirements and key performance indicators used to evaluate the project. Thus, it is paramount to consider clear communication channels between the design team and the client team from early on, with timely and comprehensive information. Establishing a communication protocol for clear and direct interaction among the stakeholders could help reduce time throughout the process, besides supporting faster decisions in the face of changes and unforeseen events, especially during the execution phase where on-site events are bound to happen, and delays may have a sizable impact on the budget and on-site logistics.
The outcomes of the study can serve as the basis of a framework to provide stakeholders with a clear structure and access to a wide range of technologies for the deep renovation of buildings. Those results can be used in the development of communication tools to facilitate the renovation workflow, resulting in more efficient renovation of the building stock.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology and execution of the study, T.K. and A.P.; formal analysis, A.P.; analysis and reporting T.K., A.P. and T.A.-M.; writing—draft preparation, T.K., A.P. and T.A.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 958445. This conference paper reflects only the authors’ views and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the ethics requirements established by European Commission’s Horizon 2020 Legal Framework.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
More information on the data presented in this study is available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions regarding the privacy of the participants and the restrictions of the project.
Acknowledgments
The study presented in this paper it part of the development of a digital platform, as part of ENSNARE (ENvelope meSh aNd digitAl framework for building Renovation). The authors would like to thank the project participants and the questionnaire respondents.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Tsemekidi Tzeiranaki, S.; Bertoldi, P.; Paci, D.; Castellazzi, L.; Ribeiro Serrenho, T.; Economidou, M.; Zangheri, P. Energy Consumption and Energy Efficiency Trends in the EU-28, 2000–2018; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Jensen, P.A.; Maslesa, E.; Berg, J.B.; Thuesen, C. Ten questions concerning sustainable building renovation. Build. Environ. 2018, 143, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artola, I.; Rademaekers, K.; Williams, R.; Yearwood, J. Boosting Building Renovation: What Potential and Value for Europe? European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- BPIE. Europe’s Buildings under the Microscope; Building Performance institute Europe: Brussels, Belgium, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, J.; Shen, G.Q.; Mao, C.; Li, Z.; Li, K. Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: An input–output-based hybrid model. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 2198–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- IEA Annex 50. Prefabricated Systems for Low Energy Renovation of Residential Buildings; Project Summary Report; Zimmermann, M., Ed.; AECOM Ltd.: Hertfordshire, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Konstantinou, T.; Heesbeen, C. Industrialized renovation of the building envelope: Realizing the potential to decarbonize the European building stock. In Rethinking Building Skins; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- European-Commission. CORDIS: EU Research Results. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu (accessed on 21 July 2021).
- Cooper, R.; Aouad, G.; Lee, A.; Wu, S.; Fleming, A.; Kagioglou, M. Process Management in Design and Construction; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Klein, T. Integral Facade Construction. Towards a New Product Architecture for Curtain Walls; Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- RIBA. Plan of Work 2020 Overview; RIBA: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira, J.; Pinheiro, M.D.; Brito, J.D. Refurbishment decision support tools review—Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects. Energy Policy 2013, 62, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konstantinou, T. Facade Refurbishment Toolbox: Supporting the Design of Residential Energy Upgrades. In A+BE|Architecture and the Built Environment; No. 9: Facade Refurbishment Toolbox; Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands, 2014; p. 420. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, Z.; Cooper, P.; Daly, D.; Ledo, L. Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build. 2012, 55, 889–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).