Next Article in Journal
Basic Understanding of the Flow Characteristics over a Bio-Inspired Corrugated Wing at a Low Reynolds Number (10’000) in Gliding Flight
Previous Article in Journal
Fish Scale-Inspired Stab-Resistant Body Armour
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Caninoid Necro-Robots: Geometrically Selected Rearticulation of Canine Mandibles †

1
School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Sanderson Building, Robert Stevenson Road, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3FB, UK
2
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, Easter Bush Campus, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Online Conference on Biomimetics (IOCB 2024), 15–17 May 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IOCB2024.
Mater. Proc. 2025, 20(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025020005
Published: 12 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Biomimetics)

Abstract

:
In line with Sustainable Development Goal 9 (sustainable industrialisation and innovation), environmentally responsible engineering designs in modern robotics should consider factors such as renewability, sustainability, and biodegradability. The robotics sector is growing at an exponential rate and, as a consequence, its contribution to e-waste is a growing concern. Our work contributes to the technological development of caninoid necro-robots, robots that are built from the skeletons of deceased dogs. The already formed skeletal structures of deceased dogs (and other animals) are ideal natural material replacements for synthetic robotic architectures such as plastics, metals, and composites. Since dog skeletons are disarticulated, simple but effective methods need to be developed to rearticulate their bodies. The canine head is essentially a large end effector, but its mandible is held together by a fibrocartilaginous joint (symphysis) that degrades at a higher rate than the bone itself. The degradation of the symphysis would ordinarily negate the utility of a canine head as a necro-robotic end effector; however, in this research, we consider simple methods of mandible reinforcement to circumvent this problem. Our research uses 3D scans of a real canine head, which is modelled using the finite element method to ascertain optimal geometrical reinforcements for the mandible. The full head structures and their reinforcements are printed and adhesively connected to determine the most effective reinforcing strategy of the mandible. Here, we elucidate geometrically selected reinforcement designs that are evidenced through mechanical testing, to successfully increase the stiffness of a disarticulated mandible.

1. Introduction

Despite a global push towards net zero by 2050 [1] and the necessity of finding new and innovative solutions to reduce waste and environmental harm [2,3], there has been very little development in the robotics sector. This may be attributed to the nascent nature of the robotics industry, with a limited number of companies offering robots for use at scale. As a result of this, the products available within the robotics sector rely heavily on virgin materials, petroleum-based plastics and energy intensive manufacturing processes. Necro-robotics aims to provide an alternative solution to these growing issues.
A necro-robot is a robotic architecture formed using the body parts of deceased animals. This is different from cyborg animals (such as cyborg insects [4,5,6,7,8]) where the animal subject is still alive and electrical stimuli are used to control the animal body parts. The design and application of necro-robots is a novel field of research with very limited existing literature mainly focusing on spider cadavers [9] and extinct species [10]. The possibility of utilising bone as a key structural material offers enormous scope to re-purpose vast quantities of waste material [11,12]. Through this, both the energy and expense of building a complete robot can be considerably reduced. Necro-robots offer a greatly decreased environmental impact (due to the biodegradability of bone [13]) in their end of life compared to traditional synthetic robots. When combined with the abundance of low-cost materials, they possess the unique quality of being more disposable. This lends them to use in high-risk and sensitive natural environments.
This paper focuses on research into caninoid necro-robots and their potential applications, specifically the head as a load-bearing end effector [14]. In order to achieve this, the key weaknesses within the mandible [15] require reinforcement. Variations in the mandible geometry between the specimens call for the use of adaptive methods such as 3D scanning, computer-aided design (CAD), finite element analysis (FEA), and fused filament fabrication (FFF) prototyping to develop unique reinforcements that can be easily applied. Having procured a historical skull and mandible from the Royal (Dick) Edinburgh Veterinary School (R(D)SVS Veterinary Ethical Review Committee: VERC Ref 209.23) this paper aims to justify the proposed method of designing reinforcements. This paper will then demonstrate that the appropriate application of reinforcements can prevent failure at key sites of weakness within the mandible.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. 3D Scanning

An EinScan Pro 2X 3D scanner (Shining 3D, Stuttgart, Germany) facilitated the capture of the surface profile of a real dried canine head geometry as a tessellated.stl output (see Figure 1) rendered using Solid Edge Shining 3D software Edition 2022. The surface model file produced by the scanner was post-processed in Mesh-Mixer to smooth the surface geometries and reduce triangle density to maximise ease of processing when using the model in other software. The resulting simplified surface model was converted to a parasolid file using Solidworks and was then imported into various cloud-based modelling software including OnShape for computer-aided designs (CADs) and SimScale for finite element analysis (FEA).

2.2. FEA

A linear elastic isotropic material model was used to simulate the canine mandible under a static structural loading of 50 N. This model provided an understanding of the suitable reinforcement location and design. In addition, the selection of suitable boundary conditions allowed for the design of a fully integrated PLA testing bracket that would provide a realistic response when the FFF archetypes were tested mechanically.

2.3. Reinforcement Design

Three reinforcement iterations were designed to fit the natural curvature of the ventral aspect of the mandible (see Figure 2). The reinforcements were designed with CAD and through a mapping of the mandible 3D scans. The three designs were manufactured using the FFF of polylactic acid (PLA) and then attached to the mandible using a polyepoxide-based adhesive. Each of the three reinforcements was manufactured with the same volume fraction.

2.4. Recreating Natural Weakness

Natural decomposition of the fibrocartilagenous in vivo jointing at the interface intersected by the median plane represents a fundamental weakness caused by maceration and subsequent ageing. To recreate this weakness within the FFF archetypes, the specimens were cut in half at the same location and reconnected with a siloxane-based adhesive.

2.5. Mechanical Testing

A custom designed and built force implementer was integrated with an Instron 3369 mechanical testing unit to apply load to all mandible specimens at both 0 and 37° angles rotated in the dorsoventral axis. For each angle, each specimen was loaded at two positions along the length of the mandible, offering a “normal” and “worst-case” loading scenario. Figure 3 shows the manufactured testing rig mounted in the Instron 3369 Universal Testing Machine with a specimen in position to be tested. The Instron 3369 was linked to the Instron Bluehill 3 Software Version 3.51, which recorded the displacement and load values during testing. The testing rig was held in place through the upper and lower clamp attachments, which were rotatable through 90°, enabling the force applicator to be aligned with the specimen.
To cover different loading techniques, we used the following three parameters: loading position, specimen angle, and reinforcement type. The loading positions were in the middle and at the end (see Figure 4) to replicate an alternative loading scenario. Loading at the end of the mandible replicated a worst-case scenario, with all the force acting through the front teeth; this created the largest bending moment on the mandible. The two specimen angles were 0° and 37° (see Figure 5). Lastly, the specimen type referred to which reinforcement was used, where the reinforcement types were as follows: control, truss, plate, and strut.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FEA Results

The FEA results validated our FFF archetype mandible bracket design and aided in predicting the failure location under load. The results for the naturally derived boundary conditions for the mandible geometry can be seen below, highlighting where the stress concentrates (see Figure 6). The results show that stress localises as a maximum on the ventral aspect of the mandible close to the edge of the fixed boundary conditions (see Figure 6A). The second highest stress concentration is found caudal to the last molars (see Figure 6B). This suggests a natural failure point between these two highest stress points.
The reinforcements were then added to the CAD models, and the FEA process was run again for each model. The results were similar and showed near identical locations for maximum stress. It should be noted that the FEA simulations did not include the use of epoxy to bond the reinforcements, and hence they were modelled as one solid object rather than consisting of two components.

3.2. Testing Results

3.2.1. FFF Mandible Archetype Testing

The FFF archetype mandibles and reinforcements were printed and tested. From the data, the values of stiffness were calculated when testing had occurred both in the middle and at the end of the mandible. In all cases the reinforcements outperformed the control at both the 0° and 37° testing angles (see Figure 7 and Figure 8).

3.2.2. Bone Testing

The control test on the bone and the test with the 3D-printed PLA reinforcement returned similar stiffness values. This was unexpected given the improvement shown in the tests on the 3D-printed mandibles. To investigate this, a steel plate reinforcement was attached to the bone sample, which returned a lower stiffness value. It was originally suspected that due to the use of hot-melt adhesive instead of epoxy, there was not a strong enough bond to transfer the bending stress to the reinforcement. Using ImageJ Version 1.54a, an image processing program, the videos were analysed, and it was found that there was no deflection in the bone mandible. This suggests that the displacement observed (Figure 9) was due to the improper fixing of the mandible within the bone testing moulds.

4. Conclusions

All the reinforcements had a positive effect on the strength of the printed models at 0 and 37°. Valuable information on the failure method of the mandible, especially in the symphysis, can be drawn from our testing and will inform the future work in the design of reinforcements for canine necro-robot mandibles. The benefit of reconstructing the mandible is in the improved structural functionality. Whereas in live animals, the mandibular integrity at the symphysis enables the prehension of food, mastication, swallowing, and the carrying of food or objects, a caninoid necro-robot mandibular reconstruction serves the primary purpose of enabling end effector functionality by creating stability, rigidity, and load bearing capacity. Simple mechanisms for articulating the mandible, as researched herein, have broad applicability. This is important as dog skulls come in a variety of sizes and shapes and simple mechanisms are easier to standardise across a wider range of skulls. Further research should be conducted to develop standard methods for connecting and actuating dog skulls and skeletal body parts, as doing so would enable the application of “one size fits all” manufacturing, which would make the use of caninoid necro-robots significantly more feasible in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.A.; methodology, B.J., O.P., J.L., F.C. and J.B.; formal analysis, O.P. and F.C.; investigation, O.P., J.L. and F.C.; resources, G.T.B., J.B. and P.A.; visualisation, B.J.; software, B.J., J.B. and Y.H.N.; writing—original draft, B.J. and J.B.; writing—review and editing, G.T.B. and P.A.; supervision, P.A.; project administration, G.T.B. and P.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The authors confirm that the above application has been reviewed by the R(D)SVS Veterinary Ethical Review Committee and received ethical approval—VERC Reference: 209.23.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available through the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
FEAFinite Element Analysis
FEMFinite Element Modeling
FFFFused Filament Fabrication
CADComputer-Aided Design

References

  1. Fankhauser, S.; Smith, S.; Allen, M.; Axelsson, K.; Hale, T.; Hepburn, C.; Kendall, J.; Khosla, R.; Lezaun, J.; Mitchell-Larson, E.; et al. The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wiesemüller, F.; Miriyev, A.; Kovac, M. Zero-footprint eco-robotics: A new perspective on biodegradable robots. In Proceedings of the 2021 Aerial Robotic Systems Physically Interacting with the Environment (AIRPHARO), Biograd na Moru, Croatia, 4–5 October 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rehamn, A.; Mack, J.; Alam, P. From e-waste to robots: A case study on e-waste upcycling in low-to-middle income countries. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC), Virtual, 2–4 December 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, Z.; Gu, Y.; Yu, L.; Yang, X.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, J.; Gu, Y. Locomotion Control of Cyborg Insects by Charge-Balanced Biphasic Electrical Stimulation. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024, 5, 0134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nguyen, H.D.; Tan, P.; Sato, H.; Doan, T.T.V. Ultra-Lightweight Cyborg Insect: Sideways walking of remote-controlled living beetle with a miniature backpack. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Cyborg and Bionic Systems (CBS), Munich, Germany, 18–20 September 2019; pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, F.; Zhang, C.; Vo Doan, T.T.; Li, Y.; Sangi, D.H.; Koh, J.S.; Huynh, N.A.; Aziz, M.F.B.; Choo, H.Y.; Ikeda, K.; et al. A Biological Micro Actuator: Graded and Closed-Loop Control of Insect Leg Motion by Electrical Stimulation of Muscles. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shoji, K.; Morishima, K.; Akiyama, Y.; Nakamura, N.; Ohno, H. Autonomous environmental monitoring by self-powered biohybrid robot. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, China, 7–10 August 2016; pp. 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vo-Doan, T.T.; Dung, V.T.; Sato, H. A Cyborg Insect Reveals a Function of a Muscle in Free Flight. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022, 2022, 9780504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yap, T.; Liu, Z.; Rajappan, A.; Shimokusu, T.; Preston, D. Necrobotics: Biotic Materials as Ready-to-Use Actuators. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2201174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nyakatura, J.; Melo, K.; Horvat, T.; Karakasiliotis, K.; Allen, V.; Andikfar, A.; Andrada, E.; Arnold, P.; Lauströer, J.; Hutchinson, J.; et al. Reverse-engineering the locomotion of a stem amniote. Nature 2019, 565, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tarafdar, A.; Gaur, V.; Rawat, N.; Wankhade, P.; Gaur, G.; Awasthi, M.; Sagar, N.; Sirohi, R. Advances in biomaterial production from animal derived waste. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 8247–8258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Anal, A. Food processing by-products and their utilization: Introduction. In Food Processing By-Products and Their Utilization; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Eriksen, A.; Nielsen, T.; Matthiesen, H.; Carøe, C.; Hansen, L.; Gregory, D.; Turner-Walker, G.; Collins, M.; Gilbert, M. Bone biodeterioration—The effect of marine and terrestrial depositional environments on early diagenesis and bone bacterial community. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reddy, P.; Suresh, V. A review on importance of universal gripper in industrial robot applications. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res. 2013, 2, 255–264. [Google Scholar]
  15. Umphlet, R.; Johnson, A. Mandibular fractures in the dog a retrospective study of 157 cases. Vet. Surg. 1990, 19, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Digital scanned skull (top) and mandibular (bottom) model using Einscan Pro 2X 3D scanner and SHINING 3D software.
Figure 1. Digital scanned skull (top) and mandibular (bottom) model using Einscan Pro 2X 3D scanner and SHINING 3D software.
Materproc 20 00005 g001
Figure 2. Three reinforcement designs: (A) solid plate, (B) strutted plate, and (C) trussed plate.
Figure 2. Three reinforcement designs: (A) solid plate, (B) strutted plate, and (C) trussed plate.
Materproc 20 00005 g002
Figure 3. Side view of generic testing setup.
Figure 3. Side view of generic testing setup.
Materproc 20 00005 g003
Figure 4. (a) Middle & (b) end loading positions.
Figure 4. (a) Middle & (b) end loading positions.
Materproc 20 00005 g004
Figure 5. (a) 0° & (b) 37° loading positions.
Figure 5. (a) 0° & (b) 37° loading positions.
Materproc 20 00005 g005
Figure 6. 50 N loading scenario on natural and CAD bracket mandible dorsoventral views. (A) Natural mandible; (B) CAD bracket mandible.
Figure 6. 50 N loading scenario on natural and CAD bracket mandible dorsoventral views. (A) Natural mandible; (B) CAD bracket mandible.
Materproc 20 00005 g006
Figure 7. 0° loading. (A) Middle loading position. (B) End load position.
Figure 7. 0° loading. (A) Middle loading position. (B) End load position.
Materproc 20 00005 g007
Figure 8. 37° loading. (A) Middle loading position. (B) End load position.
Figure 8. 37° loading. (A) Middle loading position. (B) End load position.
Materproc 20 00005 g008
Figure 9. Force–displacement curve for real bone loading tests.
Figure 9. Force–displacement curve for real bone loading tests.
Materproc 20 00005 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jørgensen, B.; Powell, O.; Coen, F.; Lord, J.; Ng, Y.H.; Brennan, J.; Bergkvist, G.T.; Alam, P. Caninoid Necro-Robots: Geometrically Selected Rearticulation of Canine Mandibles. Mater. Proc. 2025, 20, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025020005

AMA Style

Jørgensen B, Powell O, Coen F, Lord J, Ng YH, Brennan J, Bergkvist GT, Alam P. Caninoid Necro-Robots: Geometrically Selected Rearticulation of Canine Mandibles. Materials Proceedings. 2025; 20(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025020005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jørgensen, Ben, Oscar Powell, Freddie Coen, Jack Lord, Yang Han Ng, Jeremiah Brennan, Gurå Therese Bergkvist, and Parvez Alam. 2025. "Caninoid Necro-Robots: Geometrically Selected Rearticulation of Canine Mandibles" Materials Proceedings 20, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025020005

APA Style

Jørgensen, B., Powell, O., Coen, F., Lord, J., Ng, Y. H., Brennan, J., Bergkvist, G. T., & Alam, P. (2025). Caninoid Necro-Robots: Geometrically Selected Rearticulation of Canine Mandibles. Materials Proceedings, 20(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025020005

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop