Next Article in Journal
The Idea of a “Loop Fragment” of the Finite Element Force Method in the Loop Resultant Method for Static Structural Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Utilization of Stone Wool Kiln Ash in Cement-Based Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Intelligent Smart Coatings for Enhanced Corrosion Protection in Carbon Steel †

1
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
2
Department of Chemistry and Earth Science, College of Arts and Science, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
3
Center for Advanced Materials (CAM), Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
4
Central Laboratories Unit (CLU), Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2024 10th International Conference on Advanced Engineering and Technology, Incheon, Republic of Korea, 17–19 May 2024.
Mater. Proc. 2024, 18(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024018001
Published: 19 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Advanced Engineering and Technology)

Abstract

:
This study explores a new approach for corrosion protection of carbon steel, focusing on the application of polymeric coatings. Anticorrosive pigments were synthesized by loading 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole into zirconium oxide particles, and then an epoxy coating was applied on a steel substrate to analyze the corrosion inhibition activity. Analytical techniques like FTIR and XRD confirmed the successful loading of corrosion inhibitors onto zirconium dioxide nanoparticles (ZrO2), revealing changes in chemical bonding and structural patterns. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the spheroidal morphology of ZrO2 after inhibitor loading, while contact angle measurements showed improved hydrophobicity due to reduced porosity from the nanoparticles. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) showed enhanced corrosion resistance in the modified coatings compared to reference coatings, demonstrating stable impedance values and delayed electrolyte uptake. These findings suggest the potential of the developed coating system in mitigating carbon steel corrosion, offering insights for its application across various industries.

1. Introduction

Carbon steel is renowned for its affordability and strength, but it faces corrosion challenges. The management and prevention of corrosion have become focal points across various industries by employing corrosion-resistant materials, inhibitors, cathodic protection, and protective layers [1]. Traditional methods, such as organic coatings, act as passive barriers, yet their susceptibility to damage from scratches due to lack of active corrosion protection, as well as their limited durability, necessitates frequent maintenance [2]. Similarly, cathodic protection, while effective, relies on continuous power and risks uneven shielding, potentially leaving certain areas vulnerable to corrosion [3]. The deployment of intelligent coatings to shield metal surfaces has attracted the attention of many researchers. These specialized coatings are developed to deliver efficient protection against corrosion [4]. Nonetheless, it is essential to acknowledge that despite their effectiveness, smart coatings are susceptible to direct mixing of inhibitor with matrix, which can lead to an unwanted reaction and cause defects in the coating that ultimately facilitate the proliferation of corrosion [5]. To advance corrosion prevention in carbon steel, innovative strategies must offer multifaceted solutions. These advancements include robust protection mechanisms with self-repair capabilities and real-time corrosion monitoring facilitated by integrated pH-sensitive carrier/inhibitors systems to emphasize sustainability through the utilization of environmentally friendly materials [6,7]. By addressing the deficiencies of existing methods, this advanced technique of loading inhibitors into carriers aims for efficient release to ensure prolonged infrastructure durability and safety in carbon steel applications across diverse industries. Smart coatings can also contribute to reducing maintenance costs and extending the lifespan of critical assets, thus improving operational efficiency and sustainability. In addition, implementing smart coatings can minimize the environmental impact of protective coating technologies, in line with global standards for sustainable development [8]. In this study, the primary objective is to synthesize an anticorrosive pigment comprising ZrO2/2-MBT. Furthermore, incorporating anticorrosive pigments into the self-healing epoxy is a key focus. This innovative coating comprises a self-healing epoxy layer specifically tailored for carbon steel. These pigments were thoroughly characterized by utilizing scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Subsequently, the effectiveness of this novel coating in resisting corrosion will be rigorously evaluated through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests conducted at various time intervals. Moreover, the study will assess a more sustainable approach to corrosion mitigation in carbon steel applications.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Zirconium oxide (ZrO2) and 2-Marcaptobenzotriazole (2-MBT) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The epoxy resin (EPON RESIN 815C) and the curing agent (EPIKURE) were purchased from Hexion Inc., Columbus, OH, USA, and a local source provided plain carbon steel plates that were cut into the size of 30 × 30 × 1 mm3. The chemical composition of these steel plates was as follows: p = 0.04%, S = 0.04%, Mn = 0.30%, Cu = 0.20%, C = 0.21%, and Fe = 99.18%. The steel coupons were cleaned using locally available silicon carbide emery sheets (SiC) with a grit size of 120.

2.2. Development of Anticorrosive Pigments

Zirconium oxide (ZrO2−) was used as a carrier, and 2-MBT as a corrosion inhibitor. A solution was made by adding an inhibitor (2-MBT) into 30 mL of acetone, and a 1:2 ratio of the inhibitor to the carrier was used for the loading of 2-MBT into zirconium oxide. The mixture was sonicated for 10 to 15 min to thoroughly disperse the solution and allow the inhibitor to settle down in the ZrO2 particles. The resultant mixture was allowed to dry overnight at 70 °C while being stirred moderately on the hot plate. The resultant product was dried and loaded with zirconium dioxide nanoparticles after the surplus solvent of acetone was removed, which was ground slowly to obtain fine particles to avoid agglomeration. The loaded particles were named as anticorrosive pigment (ZrO2/2-MBT) and will be used for the development of modified coatings.

2.3. Preparation of Carbon Steel Sample and Formulation of Coatings

The carbon steel was polished using a silicon carbide emery sheet of 120 grit size, degreased with acetone, washed with distilled water, and dried. The polishing was carried out to obtain a rough surface, which provided mechanical interlocking for a better coating adhesion to the steel sample. The coatings were formulated by incorporating 1 wt.% of the anticorrosive particles into 5 mL of epoxy resin. The epoxy resin and anticorrosive mixture were mixed slowly to avoid bubbles. Furthermore, 1 mL of curing agent was added and subjected to 5 min of sonication to ensure homogeneity.

2.4. Application of the Coatings on the Steel Sample

The polished sample was rinsed again with ethanol before applying the coating to ensure there was no contamination, and the coating formulated was poured on the sample. The coating was uniformly applied on the steel substrate using a doctor’s blade. Two types of coatings were prepared: (a) coatings without any additives, i.e., blank coatings named reference coatings; (b) coatings with an additive of anticorrosive pigments (ZrO2/2-MBT), named modified coatings. After a competitive process, a dried coating thickness of 150 ± 5 µm was attained after a week at room temperature.

2.5. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted using a PAN analytical X’pert Pro Cu (K) with a scanning rate of 2°/min and an angle range of 10° ≤ 2θ ≤ 90°. The morphological characteristics of ZrO2/2-MBT loaded into zirconium oxide and modified coatings were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM-Nova Nano-450, FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands). To investigate alterations in bonding and the interaction of loaded ZrO2/MBT with zirconium oxide, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis was carried out. Transmission mode spectra were captured using the FTIR Frontier (PerkinElmer, Frontier, Shelton, CT, USA) in the range of 4000–500 cm−1. A contact angle goniometry machine was used to assess superhydrophobic properties. After establishing the distance, a water droplet was placed onto the coating sample, and the resulting contact angle was measured. The assessment of corrosion resistance involved conducting an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis once the coated sample had thoroughly dried. The counter electrode consisted of graphite, the reference electrode utilized Ag/AgCl, and the working electrode was coated steel. An electrolyte solution of sodium chloride with a concentration of 3.5 g per 100 mL of distilled water, corresponding to the seawater percentage, was employed. The Gamry 3000 (potentiostat/galvanostate/ZRA, Gamry, Warminster, PA, USA) facilitated the EIS analysis within the frequency range of 100 kHz to 10 mHz, proceeding from higher to lower limits. The root mean square (RMS) signal for the two-hour EIS measurement was set at 10 mV.

3. Results and Discussion

FTIR analysis was used to examine the structure and chemical bonding of both modified and unmodified ZrO2 nanoparticles, as shown in Figure 1. The incorporation of inhibitor molecules with their characteristic functional groups is illustrated by distinct peak differences between the ZrO2 and ZrO2/2-MBT spectra [9]. The findings offer important insights into the compositional alterations that occur when ZrO2 is loaded with an inhibitor. The loading of corrosion inhibitor (2-MBT) into ZrO2 was confirmed by the presence of some new peaks in the FTIR spectra of ZrO2/2-MBT, as shown in Figure 1, and no other significant peaks are seen for pure ZrO2. This offers more proof that the encapsulation inside the carrier matrix was successful as the new peaks emerged due to the presence of 2-MBT. Peaks near 1500–1700 cm−1 on ZrO2 that are linked to surface hydroxyl groups (-OH) have become less intense due to their interaction with 2-MBT molecules, which may prevent water molecules from adhering to those adsorption sites [10]. New peaks added by 2-MBT can be seen between 1000 and 1500 cm−1, and these distinctive 2-MBT peaks confirm the successful incorporation onto the ZrO2 surface.
Figure 2 illustrates the XRD analysis of ZrO2 and ZrO2/2-MBT, which shows the crystalline nature of both samples. The XRD pattern reveals the presence of a new peak in the range of 11–25° of the loaded particles ZrO2/2-MBT. However, new peaks emerged at 11.5°, 13.5°, 22.5°, 24.1° and 26.5° in the case of ZrO2/2-MBT, and this is due to the presence of 2-MBT. This new XRD pattern corresponds to the JCPDS No. for MBT: 00-008-0769 [11]. The presence of 2-MBT is responsible for the observed decrease in intensity and widening of the characteristic patterns of ZrO2, which confirms the successful loading of corrosion inhibitor 2-MBT into ZrO2.
Figure 3 depicts the morphological structure of both the ZrO2 and ZrO2/MBT observed by the SEM. The ZrO2 particles retained their spheroidal morphology; however, the size of the loaded particles (ZrO2/2-MBT) was larger than ZrO2 before loading, which is due to the slight presence of the inhibitor on the ZrO2 surface. This observation confirms inhibitor loading without appreciable morphological changes, supporting the XRD and FTIR data.
Figure 4 displays the measured contact angle for both the modified and reference coatings to analyze the hydrophobic nature of the coatings. In comparison to the reference coatings (79.3°), the modified coatings exhibit a comparatively higher contact angle (83.7°), indicating an enhanced hydrophobic nature. This increase in hydrophobicity is due to the addition of anticorrosive pigments, which offer better reduced porosity and intensify the hydrophobic properties of modified coatings [12].
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is the most important and valuable tool for the characterization of corrosion resistance properties of the coating systems [13]. A potentiostatic EIS test was carried out in 3.5 g per 100 mL NaCl solution for both reference and modified coatings. The EIS spectra obtained after the fitting were analyzed and depicted in Figure 5 and Figure 6 to obtain information on corrosion activity and corrosion protection performance of coatings. Bode plots for the reference coating (ZrO2) depicted in Figure 5a show the impedance value of above 10 M Ω⋅cm2 on the first day of immersion, which decreases even further by one order magnitude after 4 days of immersion due to water uptake and possible corrosion activity. The phase angle value for reference coatings dropped to −10 from −80 at the mid-frequency range. This makes the electrolyte (NaCl solution) easier to reach at active sites of the coating–steel interface, which leads to corrosion activity [14]. In contrast, modified coatings (ZrO2/2-MBT) show a higher impedance spectra value of 1 G Ω⋅cm2 at the low-frequency range in Figure 6a, which is due to the presence of ZrO2/2-MBT. The presence of anticorrosive pigment not only increases the impedance value but also the phase angle value remains close to −80 over a wide frequency range, as shown in Figure 6b. Moreover, the impedance spectra value for modified coatings increased above 100 G Ω⋅cm2 after 4 days of immersion due to the presence of corrosion inhibitor (2-MBT), which makes the coating more compact and reduces the active sites of corrosion [15]. This finding implies that the modified coating’s electrolyte uptake was delayed and that, in comparison to the reference coating, the coating barrier effect was significantly enhanced.

4. Conclusions

The development and characterization of an epoxy coating system for carbon steel, incorporating anticorrosive pigments, have shown promising results in enhancing corrosion resistance. Through comprehensive analyses, it was confirmed that the incorporation of corrosion inhibitors onto zirconium dioxide nanoparticles (ZrO2) successfully modified the chemical bonding and structural patterns, as evidenced by FTIR and XRD analysis. SEM observations affirmed that ZrO2 morphology remains the same after inhibitor loading, ensuring no harm to the integrity of ZrO2 as a carrier. Moreover, contact angle measurements revealed increased hydrophobicity in the modified coatings, attributed to reduced porosity from incorporated nanoparticles. Notably, EIS analysis in a 3.5 g per 100 mL NaCl solution exhibited significantly improved corrosion resistance in the modified coatings compared to reference coatings, maintaining stable impedance values around 100 G Ω⋅cm2 and delaying electrolyte uptake due to the hydrophobic nature of the coating. These outcomes collectively highlight the potential of the developed coating system to effectively mitigate corrosion in carbon steel and its applicability across various industrial settings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N.; Methodology, M.N.; Software, M.A.A.-A., A.H.A.-A., A.M., N.A. and H.I.; Validation, M.N. and A.R.; Formal analysis, M.N., A.H.A.-A., M.A.A.-A., A.M., N.A. and H.I.; Investigation, M.A.A.-A., A.H.A.-A., A.M., N.A. and H.I.; Resources, R.A.S. and N.A.-Q.; Data curation, M.N. and M.A.A.-A.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.A.A.-A., A.H.A.-A., A.M., N.A. and H.I.; Writing—review and editing, M.N. and R.A.S.; Visualization, N.A.-Q., R.A.S. and A.R.; Supervision, N.A.-Q.; Project administration, N.A.-Q.; Funding acquisition, N.A.-Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was made possible by UREP29-159-2-043 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of the Qatar Foundation). Statements made herein are solely the authors’ responsibility—open access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are unavailable due to the privacy and part of on-going research.

Acknowledgments

The authors express profound gratitude to the Central Laboratories Unit (CLU) and Center for Advanced Materials (CAM) at Qatar University for their invaluable guidance throughout this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Montemor, M.F. Functional and smart coatings for corrosion protection: A review of recent advances. Surf. Coat Technol. 2014, 258, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gurrappa, I.; Yashwanth, I.V.S. Yashwanth, Intelligent Coatings for Corrosion Control; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 17–58. [Google Scholar]
  3. Speight, J.G. Oil and Gas Corrosion Prevention; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 39–66. [Google Scholar]
  4. Morozov, Y.; Calado, L.M.; Shakoor, R.A.; Raj, R.; Kahraman, R.; Taryba, M.G.; Montemor, M.F. Epoxy Coatings Modified with a New Cerium Phosphate Inhibitor for Smart Corrosion Protection of Steel. Corr. Sci. 2019, 159, 108–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Finšgar, M.; Jackson, J. Application of corrosion inhibitors for steels in acidic media for the oil and gas industry: A review. Corr. Sci. 2014, 86, 17–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bekas, D.G.; Tsirka, K.; Baltzis, D.; Paipetis, A.S. Self-healing materials: A review of advances in materials, evaluation, characterization and monitoring technique. Compos. B Eng. 2016, 87, 92–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zheludkevich, M.L.; Tedim, J.; Ferreira, M.G.S. “Smart” coatings for active corrosion protection based on multi-functional micro and nanocontainers. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 82, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nawaz, M.; Radwan, A.B.; Kalambate, P.K.; Laiwattanapaisal, W.; Ubaid, F.; Akbar, H.M.; Shakoor, R.A.; Kahraman, R. Synergistic behavior of polyethyleneimine and epoxy monomers loaded in mesoporous silica as a corrosion-resistant self-healing epoxy coating. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 31700–31712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rai, A.K.; Singh, R.; Singh, K.N.; Singh, V.B. FTIR, Raman spectra and ab initio calculations of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole. Spectrochim Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2006, 63, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dang, B.; Jin, T.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Feng, Q.; Liu, M.; Sun, Q. Effect of nano-zirconium oxide modification on flame retardancy of lignocellulose composite. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2022, 187, 115384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sherine, J.; Upadhyay, A.; Mishra, A.; Kumar, D.; Pal, S.; Harinipriya, S. Ag(I) and Au(III) Mercaptobenzothiazole complexes induced apoptotic cell death. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xu, P.; Meng, G.; Pershin, L.; Mostaghimi, J.; Coyle, T.W. Control of the hydrophobicity of rare earth oxide coatings deposited by solution precursor plasma spray by hydrocarbon adsorption. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 62, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Biswas, A.; Mourya, P.; Mondal, D.; Pal, S.; Udayabhanu, G. Grafting effect of gum acacia on mild steel corrosion in acidic medium: Gravimetric and electrochemical study. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 251, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Raj, R.; Taryba, M.G.; Morozov, Y.; Kahraman, R.; Shakoor, R.A.; Montemor, M.F. On the synergistic corrosion inhibition and polymer healing effects of polyolefin coatings modified with Ce-loaded hydroxyapatite particles applied on steel. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 388, 138648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Njoku, D.I.; Cui, M.; Xiao, H.; Shang, B.; Li, Y. Understanding the anticorrosive protective mechanisms of modified epoxy coatings with improved barrier, active and self-healing functionalities: EIS and spectroscopic techniques. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of ZrO2 and ZrO2 loaded with 2-MBT.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of ZrO2 and ZrO2 loaded with 2-MBT.
Materproc 18 00001 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of ZrO2 and ZrO2 loaded with 2-MBT.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of ZrO2 and ZrO2 loaded with 2-MBT.
Materproc 18 00001 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) ZrO2 and (b) ZrO2 loaded with 2-MBT.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) ZrO2 and (b) ZrO2 loaded with 2-MBT.
Materproc 18 00001 g003
Figure 4. Contact angle for (a) reference and (b) modified coating.
Figure 4. Contact angle for (a) reference and (b) modified coating.
Materproc 18 00001 g004
Figure 5. EIS of (a) Bode plot and (b) phase angle for reference coating.
Figure 5. EIS of (a) Bode plot and (b) phase angle for reference coating.
Materproc 18 00001 g005
Figure 6. EIS of (a) Bode plot and (b) phase angle for modified coating.
Figure 6. EIS of (a) Bode plot and (b) phase angle for modified coating.
Materproc 18 00001 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Ani, M.A.; Al-Ardah, A.H.; Mahgoub, A.; Aboumattar, N.; Ibrahim, H.; Nawaz, M.; Shakoor, R.A.; Radwan, A.; Al-Qahtani, N. Intelligent Smart Coatings for Enhanced Corrosion Protection in Carbon Steel. Mater. Proc. 2024, 18, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024018001

AMA Style

Al-Ani MA, Al-Ardah AH, Mahgoub A, Aboumattar N, Ibrahim H, Nawaz M, Shakoor RA, Radwan A, Al-Qahtani N. Intelligent Smart Coatings for Enhanced Corrosion Protection in Carbon Steel. Materials Proceedings. 2024; 18(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024018001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Ani, Marwa A., Ala H. Al-Ardah, Amal Mahgoub, Noora Aboumattar, Hadir Ibrahim, Muddasir Nawaz, R. A. Shakoor, Ahmed Radwan, and Noora Al-Qahtani. 2024. "Intelligent Smart Coatings for Enhanced Corrosion Protection in Carbon Steel" Materials Proceedings 18, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024018001

APA Style

Al-Ani, M. A., Al-Ardah, A. H., Mahgoub, A., Aboumattar, N., Ibrahim, H., Nawaz, M., Shakoor, R. A., Radwan, A., & Al-Qahtani, N. (2024). Intelligent Smart Coatings for Enhanced Corrosion Protection in Carbon Steel. Materials Proceedings, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024018001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop