Next Article in Journal
Risk Assessment with Monte Carlo Simulation to Improve Bridge Construction Safety
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Shah et al. VIV-Based Energy Harvesting from Tandem Cylinders for Self-Sustained IoT Systems. Eng. Proc. 2024, 75, 40
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Controlling the Response of Gas-Sensitive Zinc Oxide Nanostructures to Water Vapor †

by
Svetlana S. Nalimova
1,*,
Zamir V. Shomakhov
2,
Vlada V. Miroshkina
1,
Cong D. Bui
1 and
Vyacheslav A. Moshnikov
1
1
Department of Micro- and Nanoelectronics, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, St. Petersburg 197022, Russia
2
Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies, Kabardino-Balkarian State University, Nalchik 360004, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 11th International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications (ECSA-11), 26–28 November 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ecsa-11.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 82(1), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-11-20477
Published: 26 November 2024

Abstract

:
Gas-sensitive devices have great potential for use in a variety of applications, including environmental monitoring, medicine, and various industries. The stability of gas sensors based on zinc oxide can be significantly affected by the presence of water vapors in the atmosphere. Gas-sensitive layers based on ZnO nanowires were synthesized by the hydrothermal method. The effect of different seed layers was studied in order to optimize the sensor properties of zinc oxide nanostructures. It was shown that layers consisting of zinc oxide nanowires synthesized using sacrificial doping on the seed layers of ZnO nanoparticles exhibited a moderate response to the vapor of volatile organic compounds, with almost no response to water vapor.

1. Introduction

Gas-sensitive devices have a wide range of applications, including environmental monitoring, biomedical equipment, and the pharmaceutical industry [1]. Their operation mechanism is based on changing the electrical resistance of oxide materials when gas is absorbed onto the surface of a heated oxide [2]. Recently, zinc oxide nanostructures are gaining attention as a promising material for highly sensitive and selective gas sensors [3]. ZnO has several advantages, including high biocompatibility, chemical stability, environmental safety, and low cost [4]. It can be used to detect various gasses, such as hydrogen (H2), ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ethanol, and acetone [5].
Depending on the synthesis method, zinc oxide forms a wide variety of crystalline structures, typically with a hexagonal wurtzite arrangement in which each oxygen (O2−) ion is surrounded by four zinc (Zn2+) ions at the vertices of a tetrahedron (Figure 1). This tetrahedral and non-centrosymmetric arrangement with polar symmetry along the hexagonal axis is responsible for the anisotropic growth of ZnO crystals [6]. This leads to a variety of nanostructure morphologies, including nanorods, nanowires, nanofibers, nanotubes, quantum dots, nanoparticles, nanofilms, and three-dimensional hierarchical structures [7].
One of the most significant factors influencing the characteristics of semiconductor gas sensors is the presence of water vapors [8], which can competitively adsorb on the surface of metal oxide structures. The effect of humidity on the response of TiO2 nanowires to ethanol vapors was studied in [9]. Authors found that as humidity increased, the sensor response decreased by almost 100-fold. Among all possible defects in ZnO, oxygen vacancies are crucial for enhancing the sensitivity of gas sensors [10,11]. In [12], it was demonstrated that zinc oxide nanorods with high oxygen vacancy content exhibit the highest response to ethanol vapor. An increased number of free electrons contribute to chemisorption of different oxygen particles, which participate in surface oxidation of ethanol. There are several approaches to escape the impact of humidity on the performance of semiconductor gas sensors. One of the simplest methods is surface treatment, which can be carried out by adding noble metals, alloying, modifying with hydrophobic materials, or combining with hydrophilic materials.
Subsequent processing of sensor materials can also improve their stability in humid environments. The proton beam surface treatment of zinc oxide (ZnO), described in [13], reduces response deviation when detecting nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in a humid environment. This is due to the formation of vacancies in the ZnO structure, which have a higher adsorption energy for NO2 molecules than for H2O molecules. In addition, such processes as plasma fluorination of carbon nanotubes [14] and chemical etching [15] can also be used for processing. Water vapor exposure affects not only the baseline resistance and response of the gas sensor to the target gas, but also its response and recovery times. Humidity compensation can be achieved using mathematical models and neural networks to accurately calculate the concentration of the target gas.
In this paper, we have developed approaches to the synthesis of gas-sensitive zinc oxide layers that are resistant to the influence of water vapor. We have studied the influence of seed layer type on the sensor properties of zinc oxide nanostructures.

2. Experiment

In this study, the synthesis of gas-sensitive ZnO layers consisted of two stages. First, a seed layer was deposited onto substrates using the sol–gel method or precipitated from an aqueous solution of zinc salt. Finally, nanowires were grown using hydrothermal synthesis. The solutions were deposited on ceramic sensor platforms with gold electrodes in an interdigitated configuration [16]. The seed layer was prepared by the sol–gel method using zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O) and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) [17,18,19]. Ethanol served as a solvent for the solutions. After dissolving the precursors in ethanol, the solution was deposited on the ceramic substrate by spin-coating. The substrate was then annealed at 350 °C for 30 min.
To form seed zinc oxide nanoparticles, five layers of an aqueous solution of zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O) were applied to the sensor platform using spin-coating with subsequent annealing for 15 min at 500 °C. Zinc oxide nanowires were then formed on the seed layers through hydrothermal synthesis [20,21,22,23], which was carried out in equimolar solutions of hexamethylenetetramine (C6H12N4) and zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O). Sodium iodide (NaI) or sodium bromide (NaBr) were added to the solutions to realize sacrificial doping. The corresponding samples were labeled as ZnO(I) and ZnO(Br). The layers of ZnO nanowires were grown for one hour at 85 °C and were subsequently washed with distilled water before being annealed at 500 °C for 30 min.
The surface morphology of the seed layers and nanowire layers was analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The sensor properties of synthesized nanostructures were studied. The experimental setup allows us to monitor the change in resistance of the sample as air and test gas are introduced in the cell. The air flow passes through silica gel for dehumidification and splits into two streams. The first stream of dry air is directed immediately toward the sample, while the second stream is saturated with vapors of studied substance, mixed with the dry air upon opening an electromechanical valve, and introduced into the cell with a fixed sample. Measurements were taken at 250 °C. The test gasses were isopropyl alcohol vapors at a concentration of 1000 ppm and water vapors at a concentration of 74,000 ppm. The graphs of the resistance dependence on time were built. To conduct a comparative analysis of the samples, the response values (S) to the vapors of the target gas were calculated as the ratios of the resistance of the gas-sensitive layer in air to its resistance in the presence of a given concentration of the target gas (vapors of isopropyl alcohol or water) in the atmosphere.

3. Results and Discussion

The AFM images of the synthesized seed layers are shown in Figure 2. As a result of sol–gel synthesis, porous net-like structures with a cross-section of branches in the micrometer range were formed. Nanoparticles with sizes ranging from several hundred nanometers to 1 micrometer were synthesized from an aqueous solution of a precursor salt. The results of the morphology study of the synthesized zinc oxide nanowires are shown in Figure 3. The diameter of the nanowires ranges from 20 to 120 nanometers, and the average length is approximately 200 nanometers.
As shown in our previous studies [16,21], the sacrificial doping of iodine and bromine leads to an increase in oxygen vacancies on the surface of zinc oxide nanowires. This, in turn, results in an increased gas-sensitive response.
The analysis of the interaction between samples of zinc oxide nanowires synthesized on different types of seed layers showed moderate response values, as shown in Table 1.
The gas-sensitive layers grown on ZnO-SiO2 nanocomposites exhibit similar response values to water vapors and isopropyl alcohol vapors. This can be explained by the presence of silicon dioxide (SiO2) fragments on the surface of the composites, which act as sites for the predominant adsorption of water molecules [24]. In this case, the ZnO-SiO2 nanocomposite layer controls the flow of the current through the sample. Changes in resistance occur due to changes in the thickness of conductive branches within the net-like structure, which is influenced by the Debye length. Under chosen conditions of sol–gel synthesis, branches with thicknesses ranging from hundreds of nanometers to micrometers are formed, resulting in moderate response values.
There are two mechanisms that can explain the effect of water vapors on the resistance of gas-sensitive layers. First, the adsorbed water vapors reduce the number of available adsorption sites, which in turn reduces the amount of oxygen that can be adsorbed on the surface of the semiconductor layer [25]. Second, the chemically adsorbed water molecule acts as a reducing agent and an electron donor thereby reducing the baseline resistance of the sensor [26].
At the same time, the response of the samples of zinc oxide nanowires synthesized on the seed layers of zinc oxide nanoparticles to isopropyl alcohol vapors significantly exceeds the response to water vapor. Moderate response values to isopropyl alcohol vapors may indicate that the current flows through the sample via a layer of seed ZnO nanoparticles. A high probability of this can be expected according to the results of the study on the morphology of the sample surface. The seed layer appears to have a large thickness, and the zinc oxide nanowires are not evenly distributed over the surface. Their length is also insufficient to form a continuous conductive network. A possible mechanism of the interaction between synthesized gas-sensitive layers and vapors of water and isopropyl alcohol is shown in Figure 4. When a gas-sensitive zinc oxide layer interacts with water vapor, adsorption occurs with the filling of oxygen vacancies on the surface. Nanowires can significantly increase the active area for water vapor adsorption, as they can act as “capture traps” for water molecules. However, when a current flows through the seed zinc oxide nanoparticle layer, the predominant adsorption of water vapors onto zinc oxide nanowires does not affect the resistance of the gas-sensitive layer. When isopropyl alcohol vapors appear, adsorption occurs on the surface sites of the seed layer, and interaction with negatively charged oxygen reduces the resistance of the gas-sensitive layer.
By choosing the synthesis conditions such that the zinc oxide nanowires are loosely located on the substrate, it is possible to achieve an almost complete absence of response of these gas-sensitive materials to water vapors.
The negative effect of water vapors on the response of gas-sensitive layers may be caused by the formation of hydroxyl (OH) groups from adsorbed water molecules. Unlike conventional interfering gasses, water molecules undergo a two-step adsorption process. As previously mentioned, water molecules are chemically adsorbed at the active sites of the gas-sensitive layer and reduced. After forming the first layer, as relative humidity increases, subsequent layers of water molecules physically adsorb [27]. Water molecules physically sorbed near the chemisorbed water layer can break down into H3O+ and OH ions due to the strong electrostatic field in the chemisorbed layer [28]. In physically adsorbed water, charge transfer occurs through proton jumping along a series of hydrogen bonds between ions and water molecules [29]. Such proton conductivity dominates over electric current and results in an increase in the conductivity of the sensitive layer and a reduction in its resistance as relative humidity increases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.A.M.; methodology, S.S.N. and Z.V.S.; validation, S.S.N. and V.V.M.; formal analysis, V.A.M.; investigation, V.A.M. and C.D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.N.; writing—review and editing, Z.V.S., V.V.M., C.D.B., and V.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Panda, S.; Mehlawat, S.; Dhariwal, N.; Kumar, A.; Sanger, A. Comprehensive review on gas sensors: Unveiling recent developments and addressing challenges. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 308, 117616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Korotcenkov, G. Metal oxides for solid-state gas sensors: What determines our choice? Mater. Sci. Eng. 2007, 139, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kumar, R.; Al-Dossary, O.; Kumar, G.; Umar, A. Zinc Oxide Nanostructures for NO2 Gas–Sensor Applications: A Review. Nano-Micro Lett. 2015, 7, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mandal, A.K.; Katuwal, S.; Tettey, F.; Gupta, A.; Bhattarai, S.; Jaisi, S.; Bhandari, D.P.; Shah, A.K.; Bhattarai, N.; Parajuli, N. Current Research on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Franco, M.A.; Conti, P.P.; Andre, R.S.; Correa, D.S. A review on chemiresistive ZnO gas sensors. Sens. Act. Rep. 2022, 4, 100100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, R.; Kumar, G.; Umar, A. Zinc oxide nanomaterials for photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange: A review. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2014, 6, 631–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gerbreders, V.; Krasovska, M.; Sledevskis, E.; Gerbreders, A.; Mihailova, I.; Tamanis, E.; Ogurcovs, A. Hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO nanostructures with controllable morphology change. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2020, 22, 1346–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y. Recent progress on anti-humidity strategies of chemiresistive gas sensors. Materials 2022, 15, 8728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shooshtari, M.; Salehi, A.; Vollebregt, S. Effect of temperature and humidity on the sensing performance of TiO2 nanowire-based ethanol vapor sensors. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 325501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, K.; Zhan, G.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Lin, S. Highly sensitive NO2 gas sensor based on ZnO nanoarray modulated by oxygen vacancy with Ce doping. Sens. Act. B 2023, 379, 133294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kang, Y.; Yu, F.; Zhang, L.; Wang, W.; Chen, L.; Li, Y. Review of ZnO-based nanomaterials in gas sensors. Solid State Ion. 2021, 116, 115544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chang, C.M.; Hon, M.H.; Leu, I.C. Preparation of ZnO nanorod arrays with tailored defect-related characterisitcs and their effect on the ethanol gas sensing performance. Sens. Act. B 2010, 151, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bang, J.H.; Kwon, Y.J.; Lee, J.-H.; Mirzaei, A.; Lee, H.Y.; Choi, H.; Kim, S.S.; Jeong, Y.K.; Kim, H.W. Proton-beam engineered surface-point defects for highly sensitive and reliable NO2 sensing under humid environments. J. Hazard Mater. 2021, 416, 125841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Struzzi, C.; Scardamaglia, M.; Casanova-Chafer, J.; Calavia, R.; Colomer, J.-F.; Kondyurin, A.; Bilek, M.; Britun, N.; Snyders, R. Exploiting sensor geometry for enhanced gas sensing properties of fluorinated carbon nanotubes under humid environment. Sens. Act. B 2019, 281, 945–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, S.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wu, Z.; Kong, D.; Qian, H.; Sub, B. Etching process enhanced H2O2 sensing performance of SnO2/Zn2SnO4 with reliable anti-humidity ability. Anal. Methods 2022, 14, 3335–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nalimova, S.; Shomakhov, Z.; Bobkov, A.; Moshnikov, V. Sacrificial Doping as an Approach to Controlling the Energy Properties of Adsorption Sites in Gas-Sensitive ZnO Nanowires. Micro 2023, 3, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nalimova, S.S.; Moshnikov, V.A.; Myakin, S.V. Controlling surface functional composition and improving the gas-sensing properties of metal oxide sensors by electron beam processing. Glass Phys. Chem. 2016, 42, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bozhinova, A.S.; Kaneva, N.V.; Syuleiman, S.A.; Papazova, K.I.; Dimitrov, D.T.; Kononova, I.E.; Nalimova, S.S.; Moshnikov, V.A.; Terukov, E.I. Study of the photocatalytic and sensor properties of ZnO/SiO2 nanocomposite layers. Semiconductors 2013, 47, 1636–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chudinova, G.K.; Nagovitsyn, I.A.; Gadzhiev, T.T.; Danilov, V.V.; Kurilkin, V.V.; Moshnikov, V.A.; Nalimova, S.S.; Kononova, I.E. Fluorescence of ZnO:SiO2 and SnO2:SiO2 nanosized composite films under the action of human serum albumin. Dokl. Phys. Chem. 2014, 456, 74–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nalimova, S.; Shomakhov, Z.; Moshnikov, V. Binary and Ternary Oxide Nanostructured Multisystems for Gas Sensors. Eng. Proc. 2023, 48, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shomakhov, Z.V.; Nalimova, S.S.; Bobkov, A.A.; Moshnikov, V.A. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the surface layers of faceted zinc-oxide nanorods. Semiconductors 2022, 56, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nalimova, S.S.; Shomakhov, Z.V.; Gerasimova, K.V.; Punegova, K.N.; Guketlov, A.M.; Kalmykov, R.M. Gas-sensitive composite nanostructures based on zinc oxide for detecting organic solvent vapors. Phys. Chem. Asp. Study Clust. Nanostruct. Nanomater. 2023, 14, 678–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nalimova, S.S.; Shomakhov, Z.V.; Kondratev, V.M.; Moshnikov, V.A.; Karmokov, A.M. Investigation of hierarchical gas-sensing ZnFe2O4 nanostructures. J. Surf. Inv. X-Ray Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2023, 17, S416–S422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gulevich, D.; Rumyantseva, M.; Gerasimov, E.; Marikutsa, A.; Krivetskiy, V.; Shatalova, T.; Khmelevsky, N.; Gaskov, A. Nanocomposites SnO2/SiO2 for CO Gas Sensors: Microstructure and Reactivity in the Interaction with the Gas Phase. Materials 2019, 12, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saruhan, B.; Lontio Fomekong, R.; Nahirniak, S. Influences of semiconductor metal oxide properties on gas sensing characteristics. Front. Sens. 2021, 2, 657931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, X.; Zha, L.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. Fully integrated wearable humidity sensor for respiration monitoring. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1070855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tsai, F.S.; Wang, S.J. Enhanced sensing performance of relative humidity sensors using laterally grown ZnO nanosheets. Sens. Act. B 2014, 193, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tai, W.P.; Oh, J.H. Humidity sensing behaviors of nanocrystalline Al-doped ZnO thin films prepared by sol–gel process. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2002, 13, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Agmon, N. The grotthuss mechanism. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 244, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The crystal lattice of zinc oxide.
Figure 1. The crystal lattice of zinc oxide.
Engproc 82 00098 g001
Figure 2. Seed layers for hydrothermal growth of zinc oxide nanowires: (a) ZnO-SiO2 nanocomposites, (b) ZnO nanoparticles.
Figure 2. Seed layers for hydrothermal growth of zinc oxide nanowires: (a) ZnO-SiO2 nanocomposites, (b) ZnO nanoparticles.
Engproc 82 00098 g002
Figure 3. SEM image of a layer of ZnO nanowires [16].
Figure 3. SEM image of a layer of ZnO nanowires [16].
Engproc 82 00098 g003
Figure 4. The mechanism of the interaction between the surface of zinc oxide nanostructures and gas molecules.
Figure 4. The mechanism of the interaction between the surface of zinc oxide nanostructures and gas molecules.
Engproc 82 00098 g004
Table 1. Sensor responses of samples formed on different types of seed layers to vapors of isopropyl alcohol and water.
Table 1. Sensor responses of samples formed on different types of seed layers to vapors of isopropyl alcohol and water.
Seed LayerNanowires TypeS(C3H7OH)S(H2O)
ZnO-SiO2 nanocompositesZnO(I)1.581.84
ZnO(Br)1.672.17
ZnO nanoparticlesZnO(I)2.971.21
ZnO(Br)4.031.18
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nalimova, S.S.; Shomakhov, Z.V.; Miroshkina, V.V.; Bui, C.D.; Moshnikov, V.A. Controlling the Response of Gas-Sensitive Zinc Oxide Nanostructures to Water Vapor. Eng. Proc. 2024, 82, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-11-20477

AMA Style

Nalimova SS, Shomakhov ZV, Miroshkina VV, Bui CD, Moshnikov VA. Controlling the Response of Gas-Sensitive Zinc Oxide Nanostructures to Water Vapor. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 82(1):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-11-20477

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nalimova, Svetlana S., Zamir V. Shomakhov, Vlada V. Miroshkina, Cong D. Bui, and Vyacheslav A. Moshnikov. 2024. "Controlling the Response of Gas-Sensitive Zinc Oxide Nanostructures to Water Vapor" Engineering Proceedings 82, no. 1: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-11-20477

APA Style

Nalimova, S. S., Shomakhov, Z. V., Miroshkina, V. V., Bui, C. D., & Moshnikov, V. A. (2024). Controlling the Response of Gas-Sensitive Zinc Oxide Nanostructures to Water Vapor. Engineering Proceedings, 82(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-11-20477

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop