Next Article in Journal
Lyotropic Liquid Crystal Precursor as an Innovative Herpes Simplex Virus Vector for Melanoma Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Photovoltaic Panel Parameters Estimation Using an Opposition Based Initialization Particle Swarm Optimization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

CO2 Absorption Using Potassium Carbonate as Solvent †

by
Dimitra Karali
*,
Konstantina Peloriadi
,
Nikolaos Margaritis
and
Panagiotis Grammelis
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 1–15 December 2022; Available online: https://asec2022.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 31(1), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13824
Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
One of the main sources of global warming is greenhouse gasses; the most important of which is carbon dioxide. Reducing CO2 emissions, and its utilization or storage, is a global challenge to tackle climate change. In this work, the operating conditions of the pilot CO2 capture unit are studied using the ASPEN PLUS® software. This study describes the methodology of the simulations and the main results. The unit consists of one scrubber and one stripper. For carbon dioxide absorption from gas streams, the aqueous solvent K2CO3 is used. The effect on the absorption of CO2, and regeneration of carbon dioxide and potassium carbonate were studied by varying parameters of pressure, temperature, and concentration of solvent. For each parameter, three values were evaluated with the following ranges: pressure 0.3–1 bar; temperature 80–100 °C; and concentration of potassium carbonate 15–25 wt%. The optimum operating conditions of the pilot unit are pressure of 0.3 bar, stripper temperature of 100 °C, and solvent concentration of 15 wt%. Under these conditions, 99.91% CO2 capture and 85.46% CO2 regeneration were achieved. The present research aims to find the optimal operating parameters of the pilot plant to validate the model with the experimental data. In this way, the model parameterization can be used to design large-scale CO2 capture units.

1. Introduction

The combustion of fossil fuels produces a large amount- of carbon dioxide, one of the main greenhouse gases, which impacts global warming. Tackling climate change requires reducing CO2 emissions either through the use of alternative fuels or through the use of carbon capture technologies [1,2,3]. One of the most well-known CO2 capture technologies is chemical absorption in an amine-based solvent (mono-ethanolamine (MEA), methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), etc.) followed by desorption. Amines are widely used, mainly because of their reactivity with CO2 under mild temperature (absorber: 40–65 °C; stripper: 100–120 °C) and pressure (1–2 bar) conditions [4,5]. However, amines are corrosive and cause equipment problems and, through their easy degradation by oxidation reaction, can be potentially toxic to the environment [5,6,7,8]. Additionally, another major drawback of amines is the high reboiler heat duty for desorption. An eco-friendly carbon capture process has been proposed to replace the amines with potassium carbonate (K2CO3). Potassium carbonate is less toxic and less corrosive than amines, and is considered a particularly attractive wet chemical absorbent as it has fewer energy requirements for its regeneration [9].
In this study, the absorption of CO2 using potassium carbonate solution is investigated as well as its regeneration. ASPEN PLUS® software is used to evaluate the operating parameters of the CO2 capture pilot unit.

2. Materials and Methods

In this study, the CO2 capture pilot unit using the K2CO3 solution was simulated using the ASPEN PLUS® V11 software.

2.1. Rate Based Method

CO2 capture can be modelled in Aspen Plus®, either as a thermodynamic model or as a rate model. In this study, the methodology for a rate model is used. The rate of absorption and desorption is determined by two mechanisms, mass transfer and chemical reaction, which, when combined with mass and energy balance equations, determines the concentration and temperature along the column [10,11].
Specifically, in this work, the electrolyte NRTL method is chosen for computing liquid phase properties and RK equation of state is chosen for computing vapor phase properties. CO2, H2S, N2, O2, CO, and H2 are selected as Henry-components, to which Henry’s law is applied, while the activity coefficient basis is aqueous. All the data are retrieved from Aspen Plus® databank and chemical equilibrium is assumed [12,13].
In post-combustion capture applications, the absorber is operated close to atmospheric pressure, which is similar to the input stream of flue gas. When CO2 is absorbed into K2CO3 solvents, particularly at high concentrations of K2CO3, both physical reactions and chemical reactions occur [14,15]. The summary of the reactions for the absorber and stripper specifications are:
CO2 + 2H2O ⟷ H3O+ + HCO3
HCO3 + H2O ⟷ H3O+ + CO3−2
2H2O ⟷ H3O+ + OH-
H2O + H2S ⟷ HS + H3O+
H2O + HS ⟷ S−2 + H3O+
KOH → K+ + OH

2.2. Simulation

The specifications and operating conditions are presented in Table 1. A schematic flowsheet developed in this study is presented in Figure 1.
Two main streams were specified: the solvent stream named “SOLVN”, and the flue gas stream “FLUEIN”. The flue gas was considered to be composed of CO2 and N2 while other components, such as H2O, O2, and SO2, are neglected. A solvent makeup stream was added to the recycled stream before entering the absorber in order to compensate for the solvent loss during the absorption and stripping process. The solvent was added at atmospheric pressure and at a temperature of 35 °C. From the absorber, a gas stream containing almost no carbon dioxide is released. Meanwhile, the liquid stream, which is rich in solvent, leaves the absorber and is pressurized and heated before entering the stripper. From the stripper, a gaseous stream of CO2 is produced, while the liquid solvent stream is recycled back to the absorber.
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to estimate the influence of parameters on the absorption of carbon dioxide, and the CO2 regeneration with independent parameters: (a) stripper temperature; (b) stripper pressure; and (c) concentration of solvent.

3. Results

The results of the ANOVA analysis are presented in Table 2 and Table 3. All 27 cases were simulated based on the Aspen Plus flow sheet (Figure 1) for two responses: absorption of CO2 efficiency, and regeneration of CO2 efficiency. The CO2 absorption efficiency for all cases exceeded 99.8%, and the simulation results for CO2 recovery efficiency are shown in Figure 2.

4. Discussion

ASPEN PLUS® software was used to find the optimal operating conditions of the CO2 capture pilot unit. The parameters studied were stripper pressure, stripper temperature, and solvent concentration. The CO2 absorption in all cases exceeded 99.8%. The increase in potassium carbonate solvent has a subtle decrease in absorption of CO2. This is inconsistent with the parametric analysis of K2CO3 concentration conducted by Ayittey [16]. This differentiation is due to the small variation in CO2 absorption values. The regeneration of CO2 showed a large variation of values depending on the stripper operating conditions. Figure 2a shows that reducing the pressure of stripper significantly increases CO2 recovery with a fine linear correlation (R2 > 0.785). Greater regeneration of CO2 is observed when the stripper temperature is higher, as confirmed in Figure 2b. There is a perfect linear correlation of stripper temperature with regeneration of CO2 (R2 > 0.963). The concentration of potassium carbonate in the liquid absorber is not expected to affect the regeneration of carbon dioxide (Figure 2c).
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to estimate the influence of parameters on the absorption of carbon dioxide and the CO2 regeneration. Stripper pressure and stripper temperature were chosen as independent variables, as they were suggested to influence CO2 recovery. The results of two-way ANOVA analysis were evaluated for CO2 recovery as the p-value and F-factor. As shown in Table 2, the statistically significant parameters for the regeneration of CO2 are the stripper pressure and the temperature of the stripper, with a p value lower to the level of 0.05. In addition, a one-way ANOVA analysis showed that the concentration of K2CO3 is statistically significant for the absorption of carbon dioxide (Table 3).

5. Conclusions

An eco-friendly carbon dioxide capture process is studied in this research using ASPEN PLUS® software. The capture and recovery of CO2 were simulated in an absorption and a desorption column using potassium carbonate. The parameters examined were the concentration of Κ2CO3, and the temperature and pressure of the stripper. Stripper pressure and stripper temperature influence the regeneration of CO2, as shown in the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K. and P.G.; methodology, D.K.; software, K.P.; validation, K.P., D.K., and N.M.; formal analysis, D.K.; investigation, D.K.; resources, D.K.; data curation, D.K. and K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K. and K.P.; writing—review and editing, N.M. and P.G.; visualization, D.K.; supervision, D.K.; project administration, D.K.; funding acquisition, P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Operational Program “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship & Innovation” (EPAnEK), grant number Τ2ΕΔΚ-02899/MIS5134532.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available in a publicly accessible repository that does not issue DOIs. Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://co2coccus.gr/en/ (assessed on 1 December 2022).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support of this work by the project “CoCCUS” (https://co2coccus.gr/en/) which is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH—CREATE—INNOVATE (project code: Τ2ΕΔΚ-02899/MIS5134532).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Borowski, P.F. Management of Energy Enterprises in Zero-Emission Conditions: Bamboo as an Innovative Biomass for the Production of Green Energy by Power Plants. Energies 2022, 15, 1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Borowski, P.F.; Patuk, I.; Bandala, E.R. Innovative Industrial Use of Bamboo as Key “Green” Material. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wilberforce, T.; Olabi, A.G.; Sayed, E.T.; Elsaid, K.; Abdelkareem, M. Progress in carbon capture technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 761, 143203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Garcia, M.; Knuutila, H.K.; Gu, S. ASPEN PLUS simulation model for CO2 removal with MEA: Validation of desorption model with experimental data. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4693–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Isa, F.; Zabiri, H.; Ng, N.K.; Shariff, A.M. CO2 removal via promoted potassium carbonate: A review on modeling and simulation techniques. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2018, 76, 236–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borhani, T.N.; Azarpour, A.; Akbari, V.; Alwi, S.R.; Manan, Z.A. CO2 capture with potassium carbonate solutions: A state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 41, 142–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grant, T.; Anderson, C.; Hooper, B. Comparative life cycle assessment of potassium carbonate and monoethanolamine solvents for CO2 capture from post combustion flue gases. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2014, 28, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kittel, J.; Idem, R.; Gelowitz, D.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P.; Parrain, G.; Bonneau, A. Corrosion in MEA units for CO2 capture: Pilot plant studies. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chuenphan, T.; Yurata, T.; Sema, T.; Chalermsinsuwan, B. Techno-economic sensitivity analysis for optimization of carbon dioxide capture process by potassium carbonate solution. Energy 2022, 254 Pt A, 124290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hamborg, E.S.; Kersten, S.R.; Versteeg, G.F. Absorption and desorption mass transfer rates in non-reactive systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 161, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, B.-H.; Zhang, N.; Smith, R. Rate-Based Modelling of CO2 Capture Process by Reactive Absorption with MEA. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014, 39, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chikukwa, A.; Enaasen, N.; Kvamsdal, H.M.; Hillestad, M. Dynamic modeling of post-combustion CO2 capture using amines–A review. Energy Procedia 2012, 23, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.-C. Thermodynamic modeling for CO2 absorption in aqueous MDEA solution with electrolyte NRTL model. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ngu, L.; Mahmoud, A.; Sunarso, J. Aspen Plus simulation-based parametric study of Benfield process using hot potassium carbonate promoted by diethanolamine. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 778, 012058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Isa, F.; Zabiri, H.; Harun, N.; Shariff, A.M. CO2 Removal via an Environmental Green Solvent, K2CO3–Glycine (PCGLY): Investigative Analysis of a Dynamic and Control Study. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 18213–18228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ayittey, F.K.; Saptoro, A.; Kumar, P.; Wong, M.K. Parametric study and optimisation of hot K2CO3-based post-combustion CO2 capture from a coal-fired power plant. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Aspen Plus flowsheet of CO2 capture.
Figure 1. Aspen Plus flowsheet of CO2 capture.
Engproc 31 00039 g001
Figure 2. Regeneration of CO2 for each case.
Figure 2. Regeneration of CO2 for each case.
Engproc 31 00039 g002
Table 1. Simulation parameters.
Table 1. Simulation parameters.
ParametersValues
Absorber Temperature (°C)35
Absorber Pressure (bar)1
Stripper Temperature (°C)80, 85, 100
Stripper Pressure (bar)0.3, 0.7, 1
Gas flow rate (slpm)1
Solvent flow rate (slpm)0.1
Concentration of K2CO3 (%v/v)15, 20, 25
Concentration of CO2 (%v/v)15
Table 2. Effects of parameters on regeneration of CO2 efficiency.
Table 2. Effects of parameters on regeneration of CO2 efficiency.
Sum of SquaresMean SquareF Valuep Value
Stripper pressure1.69020.8451101.33667.9357 × 10−12
Stripper temperature0.31850.15922.03961.5562 × 10−5
Error0.18350.0083
Table 3. Effects of parameters on absorption of CO2 efficiency.
Table 3. Effects of parameters on absorption of CO2 efficiency.
Sum of SquaresMean SquareF Valuep Value
Solvent concentration2.1473 × 10−61.0736 × 10−620.07857.5094 × 10−6
Error1.2833 × 10−65.3472 × 10−8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karali, D.; Peloriadi, K.; Margaritis, N.; Grammelis, P. CO2 Absorption Using Potassium Carbonate as Solvent. Eng. Proc. 2023, 31, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13824

AMA Style

Karali D, Peloriadi K, Margaritis N, Grammelis P. CO2 Absorption Using Potassium Carbonate as Solvent. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 31(1):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13824

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karali, Dimitra, Konstantina Peloriadi, Nikolaos Margaritis, and Panagiotis Grammelis. 2023. "CO2 Absorption Using Potassium Carbonate as Solvent" Engineering Proceedings 31, no. 1: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13824

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop