Next Article in Journal
In Silico Investigation of Two Benzoxanthone-Flavonoids: ADMET Analysis and Xanthine Oxidase Binding
Previous Article in Journal
Unlocking the Potential of Fishery Waste: Acid-Soluble Ultrasound Extraction of Marine Collagen from Sardine Fish Scales
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

In Silico Assessment of Enaminone–Sulfanilamides as Potential Carbonic Anhydrase II Inhibitors: Molecular Docking and ADMET Prediction †

by
Yousra Ouafa Bouone
1,
Abdeslem Bouzina
1,*,
Rachida Mansouri
2 and
Nour-Eddine Aouf
1
1
Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry, Bioorganic Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, Sciences Faculty, Badji-Mokhtar-Annaba University, P.O. Box 12, Annaba 23000, Algeria
2
Environmental Research Center (CRE), Annaba 23000, Algeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 28th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry (ECSOC-28), 15–30 November 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ecsoc-28.
Chem. Proc. 2024, 16(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20211
Published: 14 November 2024

Abstract

:
Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are a group of zinc-containing enzymes involved in many physiological processes through their role in the maintenance of the equilibrium between bicarbonate and CO2 levels. Human carbonic anhydrases (hCAs) are recognized as important drug targets due to their major implication in the development of diseases including cancer. Sulfanilamide derivatives have been widely studied and have shown remarkable efficiency in inhibiting carbonic anhydrases, with the presence of SO2NH2 in their structure. Therefore, the sulfonamide moiety is considered as the leading scaffold in the search for new hCA inhibitors. Moreover, the introduction of an enaminone to sulfonamide-based CA inhibitors showed an enhancement of inhibitory activity. In this context, we were interested in the in silico investigation of benzenesulfonamide derivatives containing β-enaminone that were synthesized from dicarbonyl compounds and sulfanilamide under microwave irradiation. The in silico assessment includes a molecular docking simulation against hCA II (PDB: 2AW1). The docked ligands showed good docking score values (−8.099 and −7.053 kcal.mol−1), which indicates a good stability of the studied compounds within the active site. Further, significant interactions with the residues of the active site were observed, including metal coordination with Zn 262, an H-bond with Thr 199, and pi–pi stacking with the side chain of His94, which are considered as the key interactions for CA inhibition. A complementary in silico study that involved ADMET prediction was performed to learn more about the pharmacokinetic properties and the toxicity of the products in order to comprehend their ability to become drug-candidates.

1. Introduction

Carbonic anhydrases are a group of zinc-containing enzymes present in the human organism. These metalloenzymes are known to be crucial in some of the different physiological reactions that help to maintain the harmony and good functioning of the human body by catalyzing the reversible transformation between CO2 and H2CO3 [1]. Human carbonic anhydrase II (hCAII) is one of the large family of carbonic anhydrases that participates in many vital processes such as gluconeogenesis, lipogenesis, osteoclast differentiation, and acid–base balance [2]. A dysfunction in hCAII was recognized as a pathogenic factor engendering many diseases, including osteopetrosis and renal tubular acidosis [3].
Sulfonamides characterized by an SO2NH2 enchainment constitute the primary pharmacophore used in hCA inhibition. This efficient inhibition is due to the significant binding between the sulfonamide group and the zinc present within the active site of hCA [4].
The search for novel small molecules as hCA inhibitors is the primary occupation of researchers in the field of targeted therapy.
Our interest was focused on the in silico study of sulfonamide derivatives containing the enaminone moiety, including molecular docking against hCAII, as well as an ADMET predictive assessment of the stated derivatives in order to evaluate theoretically their suitability to become potential drug candidates.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Molecular Docking

A molecular docking study was carried out using the Schrodinger suite (glide) [5] and 3D visualization using Chimera software 1.11.2 [6].

2.2. ADMET Prediction

The ADME parameters and drug likeness of the synthesized compound were concluded using the SwissADME [7] and MolSoft [8] online servers. Moreover, a general prediction of the studied compound’s toxicity was completed employing the ProTox-II online server [9].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Molecular Docking

In order to assess the binding mode of the investigated enaminone–sulfonamide derivatives inside the cavity of human carbonic anhydrase II, we performed a docking simulation using the existing XRD data of hCAII complexed with Valdecoxib (PDB: 2AW1).
Initially, a redocking was performed to obtain a valid docking protocol. In this context, protein was prepared using protein preparation wizard, waters were removed, and then a co-crystallized ligand was redocked using extra precision (XP). Results indicated an RMSD equal to 0.3176 Å, which corresponds to a valid value, indicating the reliability of the employed protocol. Superimposition of the docked reference ligand and the co-crystallized ligand is depicted in Figure 1.
The investigated sulfonamide-based ligands showed great stability inside the hCAII enzyme’s active pocket, exhibiting satisfactory docking scores equal to −8.099 and −7.053 kcal.mol−1.
2D and 3D views of the investigated ligands in complex with carbonic anhydrase II were displayed in Figure 2. The studied compounds displayed significant interactions with the key residues of the active site, including a metallic bond with zinc and H-bond with Thr199, as well as a pi–pi stacking interaction with His94. Several hydrophobic interactions were observed, as shown in Table 1.

3.2. ADMET Prediction

A potential drug candidate has to be subjected to many tests in order to evaluate its ability to enter the organism, including pharmacokinetic properties as well as toxicity levels.
A general prediction of the ADMET properties of the studied enaminone–sulfonamides was completed and the results are summarized in Table 2.
Based on the criteria outlined in Table 2, the compounds under investigation adhere to Lipinski’s rule of five [10], featuring a molecular weight below 500, four hydrogen bond acceptors, two hydrogen bond donors, three rotatable bonds, and a LogP value of 1.40 and 1.71. The bioavailability radar provides additional insights into the compounds’ drug-like characteristics, assessing factors such as polarity, solubility, saturation, lipophilicity, flexibility, and size. As depicted in Figure 3, the properties of the examined molecules fall within the acceptable range (indicated by the pink area). Furthermore, the drug likeness score (DLS) indicates the potential of the compound to serve as a drug candidate by comparing its attributes to those of known drugs. The DLS graphs in Figure 3 show that the DLS of compound a (0.01) and compound b (−0.07) are close to the drug area (blue plot).

4. Conclusions

Small sulfonamide-containing compounds bearing the enaminone moiety were subjected to in silico studies to evaluate their potential as drug candidates for human carbonic anhydrase II inhibition. The ligands demonstrated notable stability within the hCAII active site and formed interactions with key residues linked to their inhibitory activity. Additionally, the results of the ADMET predictions were encouraging, indicating that the compounds possess drug-like characteristics based on their predicted pharmacokinetic properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.; methodology, Y.O.B. and A.B.; software, Y.O.B. and A.B.; investigation, Y.O.B. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.O.B. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, Y.O.B., A.B., R.M. and N.-E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported financially by the General Directorate for Scientific Research and Technological Development (DG-RSDT), Algerian Ministry of Scientific Research, and Applied Organic Chemistry Laboratory (FNR 2000).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Occhipinti, R.; Boron, W.F. Role of Carbonic Anhydrases and Inhibitors in Acid-Base Physiology: Insights from Mathematical Modeling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Roumeliotis, S.; Roumeliotis, A.; Dounousi, E.; Eleftheriadis, T.; Liakopoulos, V. Biomarkers of vascular calcification in serum. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2020, 98, 91–147. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Alsharidi, A.; Al-Hamed, M.; Alsuwaida, A. Carbonic anhydrase II deficiency: Report of a novel mutation. CEN Case Rep. 2016, 5, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Carta, F.; Supuran, C.T.; Scozzafava, A. Sulfonamides and Their Isosters As Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors. Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 1149–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Friesner, R.A.; Banks, J.L.; Murphy, R.B.; Halgren, T.A.; Klicic, J.J.; Mainz, D.T.; Repasky, M.P.; Knoll, E.H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J.K.; et al. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Couch, G.S.; Greenblatt, D.M.; Meng, E.C.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Available online: https://www.swissadme.ch/ (accessed on 2 September 2024).
  8. Available online: https://www.molsoft.com/ (accessed on 2 September 2024).
  9. Available online: https://tox-new.charite.de/protox_II/ (accessed on 2 September 2024).
  10. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 46, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Superimposition of the docked reference ligand (pink) and the co-crystallized one (blue).
Figure 1. Superimposition of the docked reference ligand (pink) and the co-crystallized one (blue).
Chemproc 16 00117 g001
Figure 2. Three-dimensional (left) and two-dimensional (right) views of the ligand’s interactions inside the cavity of hCAII.
Figure 2. Three-dimensional (left) and two-dimensional (right) views of the ligand’s interactions inside the cavity of hCAII.
Chemproc 16 00117 g002aChemproc 16 00117 g002b
Figure 3. Bioavailability radar (left) and drug likeness estimation curve (right) of studied compounds.
Figure 3. Bioavailability radar (left) and drug likeness estimation curve (right) of studied compounds.
Chemproc 16 00117 g003
Table 1. H-bonds and interactions of the studied compounds and the reference ligand.
Table 1. H-bonds and interactions of the studied compounds and the reference ligand.
CompoundStructureH-BondsHydrophobic InteractionsDocking Score (kcal.mol−1)
aChemproc 16 00117 i001Thr199Pro202, Leu198, Val121, Trp209, Val143, Leu141, Val135, Ile91, Phe131−8.099
bChemproc 16 00117 i002Thr199Leu198, Val121, Trp209, Val143, Leu141, Ile91, Phe131−7.053
Reference ligandChemproc 16 00117 i003Thr199Pro201, Pro202, Leu198, Val121, Trp209, Val143, Leu141, Val135, Ile91, Phe131, Trp5, Trp123−9.001
Table 2. Predicted pharmacokinetic properties, DLS, and toxicity of compounds a and b.
Table 2. Predicted pharmacokinetic properties, DLS, and toxicity of compounds a and b.
PropertiesCompound aCompound b
Molecular weight (g per mole)266.32294.37
Rotatable bonds33
H-bond donor22
H-bond acceptor44
Violations00
Log Po/w iLOGP1.401.71
Log S ESOL−1.99−2.67
GIHighHigh
BBBNoNo
Log Kp (cm/s)−7.41−7.00
Bioavailability score0.550.55
TPSA (Å2)97.6497.64
DLS0.01−0.07
Predicted LD50 (mg/kg)50005000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouone, Y.O.; Bouzina, A.; Mansouri, R.; Aouf, N.-E. In Silico Assessment of Enaminone–Sulfanilamides as Potential Carbonic Anhydrase II Inhibitors: Molecular Docking and ADMET Prediction. Chem. Proc. 2024, 16, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20211

AMA Style

Bouone YO, Bouzina A, Mansouri R, Aouf N-E. In Silico Assessment of Enaminone–Sulfanilamides as Potential Carbonic Anhydrase II Inhibitors: Molecular Docking and ADMET Prediction. Chemistry Proceedings. 2024; 16(1):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouone, Yousra Ouafa, Abdeslem Bouzina, Rachida Mansouri, and Nour-Eddine Aouf. 2024. "In Silico Assessment of Enaminone–Sulfanilamides as Potential Carbonic Anhydrase II Inhibitors: Molecular Docking and ADMET Prediction" Chemistry Proceedings 16, no. 1: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20211

APA Style

Bouone, Y. O., Bouzina, A., Mansouri, R., & Aouf, N.-E. (2024). In Silico Assessment of Enaminone–Sulfanilamides as Potential Carbonic Anhydrase II Inhibitors: Molecular Docking and ADMET Prediction. Chemistry Proceedings, 16(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20211

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop